ML20210D409
| ML20210D409 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | McGuire, Mcguire  |
| Issue date: | 12/12/1986 |
| From: | Walker R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | Tucker H DUKE POWER CO. |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8702100084 | |
| Download: ML20210D409 (2) | |
Text
.
DEC 121986 Docket Nos. 50-369, 50-370 License Nos. NPF-9, NPF-17 Duke Pope'r Company ATTN t/Mr. H. B. Tucker, Vice President Nuclear Production Department 422 South Church Street Charlotte, NC 28242 Gentlemen:
SUBJECT:
MCGUIRE NUCLEAR STATION REGULATORY EFFECTIVENESS REVIEW Th: NRC is in the process of conducting safeguards Regulatory Effectiveness Reviews at nuclear power reactors. I wish to inform you that the McGuire 1 & 2 Nuclear Station has been chosen for such a review scheduled for the week of January 12 - 16, 1987.
The prime purpose of the review program is to evaluate the overall effectiveness of the McGui.re safeguards program and to determine whether existing safeguards regulations yield the level of protection interded by NRC.
The team performing the review supports NRC's quality assurance program for safeguards, both as it applies to McGuire's security system and to NRC's regulations.
The review will complement, but be independent of, the licensing and inspection functions.
The review at McGuire will be conducted by a team with representatives from the Division of Safeguards, Region II, and U.S. Army Special Forces personnel from Fort Bragg, North Carolina. Enclosed is a list of team members. This enclosure should be treated as Official Use Only. The review team will be comprised of two groups. One group will look at the facility's safeguards from the perspective of an insider while the other will view safeguards from an external adversary's perspective.
The review will initiate with an entrance briefing.
You may wish to have a representative of your corporate staff present during this briefing, as it, will provide an overview of the team's objectives and anticipated activities for the i
duration of the visit.
Any questions that may arise concerning the team's review technique or other matters will be addressed at that time.
For the remainder of the first day, the team would like to have a plant orientation with emphasis on safeguards areas and systems, and begin the examination of plant vital areas.
During the remainder of the onsite assessment, the team will continue reviewing vital areas and components, and the entire safeguards program. Tha last day is reserved for any activities the team has been unable to accomplish and for a briefing of plant and corporate personnel on the preliminary results of the review.
8702100084 861212 PDR ADOCK 05000369 F
-M o/
\\\\ 0
N i,
Duke Power Company CEC 12 jggg 2
during the scheduled review.Please provide appropriate plant personnel support for b security department who can communicate with alarm stations.The external group w will need escorts from both security and plant operations.
The internal group safety feature systems and components at each unit. individuals familia The latter should be effort to schedule its activities The team will make every so as to avoid disruption of normal plant operations.
The time that various team members will spend onsite will vary, but generally will range from four to seven hours per day.
If you have any questions regarding the conduct of these Regulatory Effectiveness Reviews which you wish to have answered prior visit, please contact Doug Pickett, to the team's (301) 427-4751 or Dave McGuire at (404) 331-5545 Safeguards System Evaluation Section at of the Region II staff Sincerely,
(
Original Signed by Luis A. Reyes /for Roger D. Walker, Director Division of Reactor Projects
Enclosure:
RER Team Members w/ enc 1:
. L. McConnell, Station Manager N k
$$ e t Inspector R. Burnett, NMSS R. Berkow, NRR D. Hood, NRR bec w/o encl:
Document Control Desk RII RII II RIIg RII RII RII OM DMcGuire WCline JS dhr CBu er TPeebles VBrownlee 12/11/86 12/g /86 12////86 12/p/86 12/p/86 12/ v/86 12/ v/86 i
t
.