ML20210C259

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Ack Receipt of Informing NRC of Steps Taken to Correct Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-482/86-08.Addl Info Re Failure of Mgt to Recognize Inadequacy of Fire Barriers Requested
ML20210C259
Person / Time
Site: Wolf Creek 
Issue date: 09/16/1986
From: Gagliardo J
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To: Koester G
KANSAS GAS & ELECTRIC CO.
References
NUDOCS 8609180297
Download: ML20210C259 (2)


See also: IR 05000482/1986008

Text

,

-_______ __ __-_ _ _ ___

,

d

e

.

SEP 101986

In Reply Refer To:

Docket: STN 50-482/86-08

Kansas Gas and Electric Company

ATTN: Glenn L. Koester

Vice President - Nuclear

P. O. Box 208

Wichita, Kansas 67201

Gentlemen:

Thank you for your letter of July 3,1986, in response to our letter and the

attached Notice of Violation dated July 2, 1986. As a result of our review, we

find that additional infonnation, as discussed with your Mr. O. L. Maynard,

is needed. Specifically, your response regarding Violation 482/8608-02 should

also address the reasons why the inadequate fire barriers were not recognized

by management and corrective' actions taken in a timely menner. Additionally,

your response to Violation 482/8608-03 should include whether current

surveillance procedures, drawings, and inservice inspection programs include

adequate programatic controls to ensure that the analyzed requirements will be

met.

Please provide the supplemental infonnation within 30 days of the date of this

letter.

Sincerely.

Original Signed By

J. E. Gagliardo

J. E. Gagliardo, Chief

Reactor Projects Branch

cc:

Kansas Gas and Electric Company

ATTN: Otto Maynard, Manager

of Licensing

.

P. O. Box 309 (Sharp Road)

Burlington, Kansas 66839

Forrest Rhodes, Plant Superintendent

Wolf Creek Generating Station

8609180297 860?16

P. O. Box 309

PDR

ADOCK 05000482

Burlington, Kansas

66839

G

PDR

-

Kansas Radiation Control Program Director

becs:

(seenextpag)

C:RP /

C:Rk

3

RPMullikin:cshCRiiuntb

\\

JEGag ardo

i

V9/M/86

9/g/B6

9//g/86

\\

_ __

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

{,7

-

_e_

s.

. o :, - -

.

.,,.

,

_

.. c.

._

. . '

--

. ,

,

- '

,'

",*

.

.~

'

m

.

.

.

,.

.

l

i

.'

'

<

,,

,

Kansas Gas and Electric, Company-

-2-

,

,

-

,

,

, . ,

, .

.

,

' bec' to DMB >(IE01) '

x

.

.,

becdistrib.byRIY:

RPB

Myron Karman, ELD, MNBB _(1)

Resident Inspector

R. D. Martin, RA

SectionChief(RPB/B)'

DRSP

"

'

Resident Inspector, Callaway, RIII

R&SPB

RIV File '

RSB

MIS System

R. Mullikin, RIV

RSTS Operator

D. Weiss,LFMB(AR-2015)

i

(

'

s

I

l

l

l

I

I

!

.

_

b

$l$

I

- < ,

,

KANSAS GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY

g

THE ELECTAC COMPANY

4 L E *e re L notSTER

July 31, 1986

..a

......,

...

k ?$I5k(iNl, h

Mr. E. H. Johnson, Director

, ,r

':;

Division of Reactor Safety and Projects

' %' '

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

O

M - 41966

!!'

'

Region IV

,

611 Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite 1000

W.,...

O

Arlington, Texas 76011

? $ ^ C'

KMLNRC S6-137

Re:

Docket No. STN 50-482

Subj:

Response to Inspection Report STN 50-482/86-08

Dear Mr. Johnson:

This letter

is written in reponse to your letter of July 2,

1986, which

transmitted Inspection Report STN 50-482/86-08.

As requested,

the

violations (482/8608-01,

02,

03) identified in the Inspection Report are

being addressed in four parts.

(a) The reason for the violation if admitted;

(b) The corrective steps which have been taken and the results

achieved;

(c)

Corrective

steps which will be taken to avoid further

violations; and

(d) The date when full compliance will be achieved.

.

Violation (482/8608-01):

Failure To Verify Correct Revision of

l

a Surveillance Procedure Prior To Use

!

Finding:

Wolf Creek Generating Station (WCGS) TS 6.8.1

requires that,

" Written

procedures shall be established, implemented, and maintained covering . .

.

a.

The applicable procedures recommended in Appendix A of Regulatory Guide 1.33, Revision 2, Februrary 1978."

Section 8.b.

of Appendix A to Regulatory Guide 1.33 specifies that specific

procedures for surveillance tests,

inspections, and calibrations are to be

provided.

L*f A- 0 P-

'

QL A %o u -,n -

r7

- , ~ -

201 N. Market - Wochts. Kansas - Mad Address: PO. Box 208 I Wochts, Kansas 67201 - Telephone: Area Code (316) 2616451

- .. -

-_

__

_ _ _ _ . _ _ . ._ . _ . _ _ . . _ _ _ . _ . _ _ - _ . _ _ _ . . _ . . __ _ _ _ _. . _

_-

__

a.t:.

,

.-

Mr. E. H. Johnson

July 31, 1986

KMLNRC 86-137

Page:2

,

,

1

,

Plant Administrative Procedure (ADM)02-300,

Revision 6

" Surveillance

Testing," has been established and implemented in accordance with these

requirements.

.

t

Step

5.4.1.6

states,

" Verifying prior to its use that a procedure is the

i

current revision . .

He will document this review on the surveillance

.

.

l

test routing sheet (STRS) . . . ."

1

Contrary to the above, on April 8, 1986, operations personnel performed and

the shift supervisor. signed off as complete, STS RE-004, " Shutdown Margin

Determination," without first verifying and documenting that,the procedure

being used was the correct revision and/or that temporary changes were

current.

)

Reason For Violation If Adaitted:

,

The individual who. initiated surveillace procedure STS RE-004,

" Shutdown

Margin Determination" failed to follow the administrative requirements of

'

!

ADM 02-300, Revision 6, " Surveillance Testing."

Corrective Steps Which Have Been Taken and Results Achieved

!

i

Upon notification of the failure to verify and document that the procedure

l

being used was the correct revision and that any temporary changes were

current,

the Shift Supervisor performed the required verification and

'

i

documentation. The procedure was verified to be the current revision and no

l

other descrepancies were noted.

!

'

The failure to follow this procedure was discussed with the responsible

individuals,

stressing the importance of

following

procedures

and

verification of current revisions and temporary changes,

l

i

Corrective Steps Which Will Be Taken To Avoid Further Violations:

A copy of the violation and this response will be placed in Operations.

Required Reading program to ensure operations personnel are cognizant of the

procedural requirements and importance of verifying a surveillance procedure

j

to be the current revision and that any temporary changes are current.

i

,

The Date When Full Compliance Will Be Achieved:

Full compliance will be achieved by August 15, 1986.

. . . .

. .

.

.

.

. .

.

. .

-

. ....

.

-~ _

-

-

_.

-

_

._

. _ . - - . _

- -

-.

.-

. . .

e

l

Mr. E. H. Johnson

July 31, 1986

,

KMLNRC 86-137

Page 3

i

i

Violation (482/8608-02): Failure To Maintain Auxiliary Buildins

Buttress Penetrations In Accordance With

-

Fire Hazards Analysis

Finding:

WCGS TS 3.7.11 requires, in part, that, "All fire barrier penetrations . . .

separating safety-related fire areas . . . shall be operable.'

I

Contrary to the above, on April 7,

1986,

it was determined that the floor

penetration covers on either side of 'C' containment tendon buttress on

Elevations 2047' and 2026' were not 3-hour fire barriera and were outside

the design basis as specified by the fire hazards analysis.

.i

1

Reason For Violation If Admitted:

.

The covers of the openings were installed in accordance with the original

design which was inadequate to maintain the three-hour fire rating.

Kansas

Gas & Electric Company (KG&E) was notified of the necessity of adding

,

i

fireproofing to the existing covers by the Architect / Engineer in June of

1985.

Shortly after this notification, a Plant Modification Request was

initiated to add the required fireproofing, but during the initial review of

!

this information,

the Fire Hazards Analysis

impact

and

Technical

l

Specification

applicability

of

this situation were not recognized.

Consequently, the Plant Modification Request was assigned a relatively low

'

priority, and had not yet been implemented.

This occurrence was the result of a deficiency in the original design, and

the failure to install the required fireproofing is attributed to a

!

personnel error. A contributing factor may have been that the personnel who

!

reviewed the information were not completely familiar with all Technical

!

Specification requirements in June of 1985.

I

Corrective Steps Which Have Been Taken and Results Achieved:

Upon discovery of the unsatisfactory condition, hourly fire watch patrols

,

I

were established and have been maintained in accordance with Technical

l

Specifications.

.

Corrective Steps Which Will Be Taken To Avoid Further Violations:

The Plant Modification Request

(PMR)

for installation of the missing

fireproofing has been processed for implementation and the material is on

order. Estimated date of material receipt is August 29, 1986. Upon receipt

of the required fireproofing material, the PMR will be implemented and will

j

require one to two weeks to complete.

!

.

1

!

!

.

.

.

.

. .

.

_ _ . _ , . . ,

.

.-.

_ _ . _ , _ _ _ . , . _ _ _

.

.,.

.

Mr. E. H. Johnson

July 31, 1986

KMLNRC 86-137

Page 4

.

Since June of 1985,

the PMR process has been substantially revised,

including a provision for appropriate supervisory personnel to assist in the

determination ~ of Technical Specification applicability of proposed design

changes.

In addition, personnel have gained familiarity with Technical

Specification and Final Safety Analysis Report requirements.

The Date When Full Compliance Will Be Achieved:

.

Technical Specification compliance has been achieved

in

that

fire

impairments identify the requirement for an hourly fir'e watch in the

affected areas. These fire watches have been implemented.

Full compliance

to the design specifications will be completed by November 15, 1986 based on

a material receipt date of August 29, 1986.

Violation (482/8608-03): Failure To Adequately Perform TS

Surveillance Requirement

i

Findings

i

WCGS TS 4.0.5 requires, in part, that, " Inservice inspection of ASME Code

Class 1, 2, and 3 components and inservice testing of ASME Code Class 1,

'

,

and 3 pumps and valves shall be performed in accordance with Section XI

f

,

the ASME Boiler and Pressure Code . . . except where specific written relief

has been granted . . . ."

ASME Section XI, Division 1, 1980 Edition, Subsection IWV, states, in part,

"If a valve . .

exceeds its specified limiting value of full-stroke time

.

by this testing, then corrective action shall be initiated immediately.

If

the condition is not, or cannot be,

corrected within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />, the valve

shall be declared inoperative."

Contrary to the above, on March 5,

1986, the open limit switches to valves

AL HV-032 and AL HV-033 (essential service water to turbine driven auxiliary

feedwater pump) were adjusted in the closed direction in order to meet the

stroke time requirement of 15 seconds, however, this action reduced the

stroke travel of the valve so that it no longer fulfilled the full-stroke

provisions of ASME Section XI.

Thus, the valve did not meet its full-stroke

time.

l

Reason For Violation If Admitted:

Following failure of the valves to meet their required fifteen (15) second

stroke time, a work request was written to investigate and correct the

problem.

The personnel performing the maintenance activity incorrectly

l

ahortened the stroke of the valves following technical manual and schematic

'

instructions.

l

. __

_ _ - - _

_ , - . - - - - - -

-- -

- - - - --.

-.

_ _

.

  • * . .

.

Mr. E. H. Johnson

July 31, 1986

KMLNRC 86-137

Page 5

,

a

l

,

Corrective Steps Which Have Been Taken and Results Achieved:

Following an engineering evaluation of the occurrence, the valves were

readjusted to full open, less a slight amount for valve coast.

The

engineering evaluation verified that at no time was flow decreased below

that required to meet the safety analysis.

The valves stroke time was

reevaluated and

increased as the previously established stroke time of

fifteen (15) seconds was very conservative.

s

Corrective Steps Which Will Be Taken To Avoid Further Violations:

A review has been performed for all other valves with stroke times in the

Section XI valve program to identify any that may have had their stroke

limits adjusted. No further instances of limit switch adjustment to satisfy

valve stroke times were identified.

In addition,

personnel performing

maintenance activities in the Section XI valve program will be advised that

stroke lengths cannot be shortened in order to satisfy valve stroke times

without a proper evaluation.

.

The Date When Full Compliance Will Be Achieved:

Full compliance will be schieved by September 1,1986.

!

If you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact me or Mr.

O. L. Maynard of my staff.

'

Very truly yours,

j

Glenn L. Koester

Vice President - Nuclear

GLK:see

cc P0'Connor (2)

JCummins

JTaylor

~ . . . _ . _ . _ _ _ . - _ _ - . _ _ . _ . _ _ _ _ . . ~ - _ , _ _ _ _ _ - . - _ , . - _ - _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ .