ML20210A657
| ML20210A657 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Davis Besse |
| Issue date: | 01/29/1987 |
| From: | Axelson W NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | Williams J TOLEDO EDISON CO. |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20210A662 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8702060513 | |
| Download: ML20210A657 (2) | |
See also: IR 05000346/1987002
Text
_
_ -_
_
_
._.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ _ _ _
c'
'J
pg
OArroll ADno turnnamar n s'
,uniL.u w u w v ini VITIYir1I . U l
JAN 2 91987
Docket No. 50-346
Toledo Edison Company
ATTN: Mr. Joe Williams, Jr.
Vice President
Nuclear
Edison Plaza
!.
300 Madison Avenue
Toledo, OH 43652
Gentlemen:
This refers to the routine safeguards inspection conducted by Mr. B. Drouin
of this office on January 5-9, 1987, of activities at Davis-Besse Nuclear
Power Station authorized by NRC Operating License No. NPF-3, and to the
discussion of our findings with Mr. D. Saunders and other members of your
staff at the conclusion of the onsite inspection.
The enclosed copy of our inspection report identifies areas examined during
the inspection. Within these areas, the inspection consisted of a selective
examination of procedures and representative records, observations, and
interviews with personnel.
During this inspection, certain of your activities appeared to be in violation
of NRC requirements, as described in the enclosed Notice.
The inspection
showed that action had been taken to correct the identified violation and
to prevent recurrence. Our understanding of your corrective actions are
described in Section 5 of the enclosed inspection report.
Consequently, no
reply to the violation is required and we have no further questions regarding
this matter at this time.
We acknowledge the significant accomplishments and new initiatives that have
occurred in the security program since the last inspection. We encourage the
continued Toledo Edison Company corporate and plant support to the security
program. We realize that the support has made a significant contribution to
the overall effectiveness of the security program.
Areas examined during this inspection concern a subject matter which is exempt
from disclosure according to Part 73, Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations,
Section 73.21(c)(2).
This information must be handled and protected in
accordance with the provisions of 10 CFR 73.21.
Consequently, the enclosure
to this letter and our report of this inspection will not be placed in the NRC
\\
Public Document Room,
V
g0
f
8702060513 870129
ADOCK 05000346
O
!."'1^
. e centaing
{i
% Il@::ATICll
'
Utt .pQl ' A 3 Td
\\, IA D U A'
A \\
'
h'a thi;
OA!
'
,
.m
n
i so
unvM
J o ' wrong
-
,
e'
af
a
r" A l
A n so matr An
L J ATI A
'
SWLUL nn 10 Il1FUIT V MIIVI
JAN 2 9 W
Toledo Edison Company
2
We will gladly discuss any questions you have concerning this inspection.
Sincerely,
W. L. Axelson, Chief
Nuclear Materials Safety and
Safeguards Branch
Enclosures:
1.
2.
Inspection Report
No. 50-346/87002(DRSS)
(UNCLASSIFIED SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION)
cc w/ enclosures:
L. Storz, Plant Manager
IE File
IE/DI/0RPB
IE/ES
NMSS/SGPL
NRR/PWR-B/SSPB
cc w/ enclosures, w/o
UNCLASSIFIED SAFEGUARDS
INFORMATION:
DCS/RSB (RIDS)
Licensing Fee Management Branch
Resident Inspector, RIII
James W. Harris, State of Ohio
Robert H. Quillin, Ohio
Department of Health
State of Ohio, Public
Utilities Commission
RIII
RIIf
RII p ,
RIII
[ltR/d *
Depyette
Axe on:
or
'
a
e
Drouin/nma
/[N/b
i Yl hc10surecontains
/A8/91
4
[
UNEGU;s,0S 12CRMATION
U cn "" arat.icn this
--
I
U
,,
- * ~ ^
~ **
n..*
__
. _ _ _ _