ML20209G907
| ML20209G907 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Waterford  |
| Issue date: | 12/03/1984 |
| From: | Wilson C QUALITY TECHNOLOGY CO. |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20209G843 | List: |
| References | |
| FOIA-85-123 QI-84-057-1, QI-84-57-1, NUDOCS 8509190749 | |
| Download: ML20209G907 (2) | |
Text
__ _
ym!
n n T
[,\\
iJt l
\\
l s t; g
Q1 INVI S110A;10N ETPf 41 F111' #
(1-6.-C' SL' EJECT:
During P.O.D Meeting a LP&L con,struction enployer com:ented that Ebasco needed to transfer / fire QC inspector for writing CIVA's.
ACTION ITEM #
IP g
PERFORMED BY:
Wilson, Snowden OEJECTIVI OT IhVESTIGATIO!;
Attempt to discreetly determine who was present at the teeting in question end what was said.
i DETAILS
/
On 12/3/84, QT investigaters above called jindicqted he had been in attendance the P.O.D. meeting and overhead con =ents by
)LP&LConstruction et ceployee, made about alleger to the effect that'Ebasco aNould find a way to
{
trcusier alleger to South Texas Project and then terminate him for wripng CIWA's at Waterford 111.
i Othe,rs at this meeting took up for alleger. /
cnd took up f or alleger fer de;,ng his job properly.'was one who said thatgthat yould no
/could not recall who else was present or any others making comments aSout alleger.
On 12/3/84, the same QT investigators above discussed this matter v4th Dale l
Dobson, LP&L Project Manager.
Mr. Dobson stated that he would call in to counsel him on the inappropriateness of the comment about transferring /
011eger to the Ebasce Seuth Texas Project and then terninttir.g hit.
i.
/'2
.3 [Y Signature
/
Date 1
8509190749 850910 PDR FOIA BERNABE85-123 PDR f *,) f J
~
Q4-84-049 REPORT OF INTERVIEW WITH T.
,/
t On February 21, 984, 1Ebasco Services Inc. (Ebasco), was interviewed at his residence ate by NRC Investigators Donald D. DRT5 KILL and Mark EMERSON. '
ted he had been employed tty Ebasco at the Louisiana Power & Light sCo, (LP&L) Waterford 3 I
site from related he had been terminated due to a reduction of force of Ebasco QC ' inspectors at Waterford 3.
When questioned regarding his, concerns, relative to alleged QC intimidation at Waterford 3, stated an LP&L '
suggested that he be 3" transferred to the South Texas Projet't gnd termin ed."
He stated made these coments because he had written excessive Conditipn
)
Identification Work Authorizatibns (CIWAs) in recent months. I acknowledged (hedidnot.personallyhearthesestapementsanda'ddedthat a co-worker,
, advised)him
, of potentially intimidating statements. '
statements al,legedl'y were made to a group of. Ebasco and LP&L supervisors during anl l
asosaidhehadbeenadvisedthpt
~
supported and defended him, during ha the production meetin'g.
Jsaid he subsequent'ly met with NRC
, represeqtatives Tracy FLTPPO apd William CROSSMAN and advised the NRC of statements.I ialso said he to d.the NRC of his s
technical concerns whic prompted)him to write
~ in regard to Waterford 3.
stated he had previously aovised his s
department superv sor.-
fofhisintentiontynotifystheNRC l
of his concerns.
jrela,ted
'did not take statements seriously. e
'sais( he lat r met w,ith j
state ladvlsed him
/
statements regardi g the South Texas Projectmere not t,o be taken seriously and tha
'was just " blowing off steam."(.
I
((reportedlyadviset/statedhewascon'tactedbyPhillipSNQWDEN,anLP&LQuality that notification of the NRC was premature.
Team representative, who researched!
Outstanding CIWAs and I
found them to be in proper order and awaiting final work and inspection.
/
In sumation, said although he never felt intimidated by feltcompelledtoreporttp
- s tp tements, e incident.(
.a knowledged'pe received a letter during
/
Ifrom LP&L management stating had been counselpd for his, i
inappropriate statements during the prod ction meeting, f ~
said f
he felt satisfied with the counseling of
,was unable to t
provide further pertinent information.
i i
i l
3 EXHIBIT (4)
[
>