ML20209G907

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Quality Technology Investigation Rept Informing That Individuals Present at Plan of Day Meeting Claim to Support Alleger for Doing Job Properly.Employee Will Be Counseled on Inappropriateness of Allegations.Portions Deleted
ML20209G907
Person / Time
Site: Waterford Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 12/03/1984
From: Wilson C
QUALITY TECHNOLOGY CO.
To:
Shared Package
ML20209G843 List:
References
FOIA-85-123 QI-84-057-1, QI-84-57-1, NUDOCS 8509190749
Download: ML20209G907 (2)


Text

__ _

ym! n nT [,\

\ l s t; g iJt l ,

Q1 INVI S110A;10N ETPf 41 F111' # (1-6.-C' -!

SL' EJECT: During P.O.D Meeting a LP&L con,struction enployer com:ented that Ebasco needed to transfer / fire QC inspector for writing CIVA's.

ACTION ITEM # IP g PERFORMED BY: Wilson, Snowden OEJECTIVI OT IhVESTIGATIO!;

Attempt to discreetly determine who was present at the teeting in question end what was said.

i DETAILS

/

On 12/3/84, QT investigaters above called jindicqted he had been in attendance et the P.O.D. meeting and overhead con =ents by ,

)LP&LConstruction  !

ceployee, made about alleger to the effect that'Ebasco aNould find a way to trcusier alleger to South Texas Project and then terminate him for wripng

{

CIWA's at Waterford 111. Othe,rs at this meeting took up for alleger. / i cnd took up f or alleger fer de;,ng his job properly.'was/could one who not said recallthatgthat yould no who else was present or any others making comments aSout alleger.

On 12/3/84, the same QT investigators above discussed this matter v4th Dale Dobson, LP&L Project Manager.

Mr. Dobson stated that he would call l in to counsel him on the inappropriateness of the comment about transferring /

011eger to the Ebasce Seuth Texas Project and then terninttir.g hit.

i.

/'2 .3 [Y

  • Signature /

Date 1

8509190749 850910 PDR FOIA BERNABE85-123 PDR f * ,) f J

~

Q4-84-049

,. REPORT OF INTERVIEW WITH

,/ . T.

t On February 21, 984, 1Ebasco Services Inc. (Ebasco), was interviewed at his residence ate by NRC Investigators Donald D. DRT5 KILL and Mark EMERSON. ' ted he had been employed tty Ebasco at the Louisiana Power & Light sCo, (LP&L) Waterford 3 site from ,

I related he had been terminated due to a reduction of force of Ebasco QC ' inspectors at Waterford 3.

When questioned regarding his, concerns, relative to alleged QC intimidation at Waterford 3, stated an LP&L '

, suggested that he be 3" transferred to the South Texas Projet't gnd termin ed." He stated made these coments because he had written excessive Conditipn )

Identification Work Authorizatibns (CIWAs) in recent months. I acknowledged a co-worker, (hedidnot.personallyhearthesestapementsanda'ddedthat

, of potentially intimidating statements. ' , advised)him statements al,legedl'y were made to a group of. Ebasco and LP&L supervisors during anl l asosaidhehadbeenadvisedthpt ha supported and defended him, during the production meetin'g.

~

Jsaid he subsequent'ly met with NRC

, represeqtatives Tracy FLTPPO apd William CROSSMAN and advised the NRC of ialso said he to d .the NRC of his statements.I s technical concerns whic ~ in regard to Waterford 3. prompted)him statedtohe s

write had previously aovised his department superv sor.- fofhisintentiontynotifystheNRC l of his concerns. jrela,ted 'did not take statements seriously. e

'sais( he lat r met w,ith $

j state ladvlsed him /

statements regardi g the South Texas Projectmere not t,o be taken

seriously and tha 'was just " blowing off steam."(. I that notification of the NRC was premature.

((reportedlyadviset/statedhewascon'tactedbyPhillipSNQWDEN,anLP&LQuality Team representative, who researched! Outstanding CIWAs and I found them to be in proper order and awaiting final work and inspection. /

In sumation, said although he never felt intimidated by

s tp tements , e feltcompelledtoreporttp

' incident.( .a knowledged'pe received a letter during -

/ Ifrom LP&L management stating had been counselpd for his, i inappropriate statements during the prodfction meeting, f ~ said he felt satisfied with the counseling of ,was unable to t

i provide further pertinent information. -

i i

l 3 EXHIBIT (4)

[ >