ML20209G866

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Requests That Investigative Inquiry Be Conducted Into Allegations of Intimidation by Util Employee Re Need to Fire QC Inspector for Writing Condition Identification Work Authorizations.Portions Deleted
ML20209G866
Person / Time
Site: Waterford Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 10/24/1984
From: Martin R
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To: Herr R
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
Shared Package
ML20209G843 List:
References
FOIA-85-123 NUDOCS 8509190719
Download: ML20209G866 (3)


Text

, ,p'"*., tir. sit p 51 A1 5 - '-

.'. Q4-84-049  ;

NUCLE AR Rt GULA10RY COfAMISSION  !

I.4

'.  ?*

.$ ni cioN ev b / 611 RY AN PL AZ A Dhlvl stilit 1000 .

  • %, / ARllNG10N.1[h As Mol)

=...*

't.

OCT 2 4 m4 HIM3RANDUM FOR: R. K. Herr, Director '

Of,fice of Investigation's, Regio 6 JV FROM: Robert D. Martin Regional Administrator, Region IV SUBJICT: POSSIBLE IN11MIDATJON (WAltRIORD 3)

/ 5 A ( , ,_ , contacted the Resident Inspector, Trecy A. T11ppo, with goncerns that he has bten intin.i ated by statements made by the Jf&L

[ - . .j,$ ~ ~. '~ ~

lduringameeting,kE"- ~"' l was not

,present a,1 the sneeting, but was ' informed by another individual (unknown) that E ~~ .llallegedly stated he should be fired for identifying problems. The problems 'hsd becen ipentified in CondiJion 1dentificption k'ork Authorizations (CIWAs) written by m f . -

_- =. - who is an Ebasco C inspector, was allebed to h6ve been pVesent in the seeting with .

)

Ei sed o' n the above information, I am requesting 01 to conduct an investigative inquiry into this matter. Region IV will provide technical assistance as necessary.

(

Robert D. Martin Regional Administrator

.: w .n .

r- ~~ M .

,v s f. m.

,e. 4 m i

s

' 57. d.I $

- L M3 . ,.c i E= P. c, 4 Ut - -

p c-

.$ ~

q;k,

?~. 14 ,V*

~

' . ; = __

l

'.  ;.- c .*

.f.k. f .

i_

x, ,

<v. j. , D

,., ,., ' -s S., us

-f&M E ~ .. yl.. % ;,9.

8509190719 850910 PDR FOIA EXtlIBIT (1)

BERNAB E85-123 PDR w

F-s'O ' ' 8, UNIII D 11c.18 &

.

  • NUCLL %R REGULATORY COMMISSION h' f ' F' [. t o

Al GION IV I, 4 I' .

  • l Sit RY AN PLAI A ORivl . SL' lit 1000

'* ARLING10N.1tRAS M011 t.

OCT 2 419N MEMORANDUM FOR: R. K. Herr, Director i Office of Investigations, Region'3V .

FROM: Robert D. Martin Regional Administrator, Region IV

SUBJECT:

POSSIBL[ ]NTIMIDAT]DN (WAT[RFORD 3)

A contacted the Resident Inspector, Tracy A. F11ppo, with 6ncerns that he has t'een intim{ dated by statements,made by the (P&L l during a meeting. was not resent a themeeting,butwas'informedbyanother(individual (unknown)that

, allegedly stated he _ _ j The

' problems had been/ 1 fentified in Gopdition Identifi(atiisn Work Authoritations (C]WAs) written byl whoisan[pstoQC ]/

inspector, was alle'ged to have be,efi present in the' meeting witg ~ .,,/

P4 sed on the above information,1 am requesting 01 to conduct an investigati.ve inquiry into this matter. Region IV will provide technical assistance as necessary. ,

~

Robert D. Martin Regional Administrator i

  • 8 *

...e ***'..er

?

~

. me , , g 6 Ek' g g a .

g .

i i

r 9 ~ic "

i H e-!

L? f=e O en f ' C rl w Le,

.; i!. " h f't:.

i .

t.::

W j.jl

!. D

<. m

. Fo / A - 5 553 d 6/+

Q4-84-049 QUALITY TEAM QUALITY CONCERN g DISPOSIT10h FORM -

FILE i: QI-84-057-1 ,

DATE OF PREPARATION: December 3, 1964 CONCERN (S):

During a Plan of the Day Meeting, a LP&L employee commented that Ebasco needed to transfer / fire QC inspector for writing CIWA's.

FINDINCS(S):

During jat a Plan of the Day Meeting between LP&L and Ebasco Quality and Construction Supervisors, a LP&L construction empl,oyee

~

connen d to an Ebasco supervisor that a QC inspector who wrote f .,

[ hould be transferred to South Texas Project and then terminated. No other P&L supervisors or Ebasco personnel at this meeting expressed any (

cariousness about this comment, C ~~~ ~ , ~ ? ~ ~ 1 took up for the QC inspector and spoke out about the inappropriateness of the suggestion.

CORRECTIVE ACTION (S)

TAKEN:

NONE. No discrimination against the QC inspector occurred. LP&L project

. manager advised that he would call the LP&L construction employee into his office for counseling on the inappropriateness of the connent.

~

t CLOSURE STATEMENT:

This concern has merits, although no discrimination is substantiated.

ocCLOSED** .F r

EXHIBIT (2)

._ . . _ _ .