ML20209G310

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Employee Concern Repts Re Const,Qa & Operation. Repts Completed Final Review by Senior Review Panel & Employee Concern Task Group Mgt
ML20209G310
Person / Time
Site: Sequoyah  
Issue date: 04/27/1987
From: Martin M
TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY
To:
NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION & RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (ARM)
Shared Package
ML20209G315 List:
References
NUDOCS 8704300517
Download: ML20209G310 (10)


Text

_

  1. w v'

TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY Watts Bar Nuclear Plant P. O. Box 800 Spring City, Tennessee 37381 April 27, 1987 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555 Gentlemen:

In the Matter of the Application of

)

Docket Nos.

50-327 Tennessee Valley Authority

)

50-328 EMPLOYEE CONCERNS TASK GROUP (ECTG) provides a listing of the report numbers, the related employee concerns, and the previous submittal dates if applicable. To assist you in your review of these reports, Enclosure 2 provides a comparison between the ECTG Writer's Guide reconunended report format and the transmitted reports. transmits the revised final element reports for 4 elements addressing Sequoyah Nuclear Plant employee concerns in the following categories:

Construction

- 1 report Quality Assurance - 1 report Operation

- 2 reports As indicated by the report cover sheets, these reports have completed final review by the Senior Review Panel and the Employee Concern Tast Group management.

Please telephone me at (615) 365-3587 (Watts Bar) if you have any questions.

Very truly yours, TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY M.D.

GA M. S. Martin Watts Bar Nuclear Plant ECTG Licensing Manager cc (See page 2.):

L sp ggcS8clE5kkl7 P

An Equal Opportunity Employer

2

/*

o' U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission cc (Enclosures):

Mr. G. G. Zech, Assistant Director Regional Inspections Division of TVA Projects Office of Special Projects U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region II 101 Marietta Street, NW, Suite 2900 Atlanta, Georgia 30323 Mr. John A. Zwolinski, Assistant Director For Projects Division of TVA Projects Office of Special Projects U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 4350 East West Highway EWW 322 Bethesda, Maryland 20018 Sequoyah Resident Inspector Sequoyah Nuclear Plant 2600 Igou Ferry Road Soddy-Daisy. Tennessee 37379 4941T f

-- -,---,, - ~,.., -,.. -. - -

.,,,-,--,-,-,,.n_,.-.n,.

'9 O

6 O

a e

I 1

,_w p

.w w*7*

'"7

-r,~r - ~' " " " ' " " ~ ~ ~ ~ " ~ ~ _

, _ _ _ _, - - - - - - - - - - ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ^ '

ENCLOSURE 1

~,

Page 1 of 2 SEQUOYAH EMPLOYEE ELEMENT REPORT CONCERN NUMBER ISSUE Construction 10900 EX-85-076-003 Cable (Revised Final)

EX-85-086-001 4

IN-85-213-001 IN-85-255-001 IN-85-295-003 IN-85-325-005 IN-85-433-002 IN-85-436-004 IN-85-581-001 IN-85-733-001 IN-85-856-005 IN-85-935-001 IN-85-978-001 IN-86-028-001 IN-86-199-001 IN-86-201-001 IN-86-259-001

  • IN-86-259-004 IN-86-262-003 XX-85-008-001 j

XX-85-094-004 EX-85-157-002 IN-86-266-006 WI-85-100-013 MAS-85-003 JLH 86-002 00-85-005-014 IN-86-259-005 i

IN-86-268-002 OW-85-007-004 IN-85-009-001 IN-85-120-001 IN-85-018-004 XX-85-094-005 IN-85-300-002 IN-86-268-003

  • IN-86-314-005
  • I-85 -101-WBN
  • PH-85-003-N32
    • IN-85-506-002
  • Concerns added after 9/26/86.
    • Concern deleted after 9/26/86.

NOTE: C010900 was submitted final 1/29/87.

It is bein6 revised to incorporate a revised corrective action plan (CAP).

i

. -. _., _ _ - - - _ -. _ _ -. -. - _ -., - - _ _ - - - _,. ~, _ _ - _ _. _. - _ - -

  • I ENCLOSURE 1 Page 2 of 2 SEQUOYAH EMPLOYEE ELEMENT REPORT CONCERN NUMBER ISSUE Operation 30206 SQP-5-004-002 Transfer Canal Electrical (Revised Final)

SQP-6-011-001 Equipment Problem NOTE: OP30206 was submitted final 2/26/87. It is being revised to incorporate additional evaluation of a drawing / configuration check.

Operation 30706 XX-85-001-001 Test Procedure / Programs (Revised Final)

SQM-86-004-017 WBN-233 XX-85-077-001

  • IN-86-209-011
    • SQM-86-004-018
  • Concern IN-86-209-011 added after 9/26/86.
    • Concern SQM-86-004-018 deleted after 9/26/86.

NOTE: OP30706 was submitted final 11/24/86.

It is being revised to incorporate NRC comments.

Quality Assurance 80202 00-85-005-002 Inspection / Inspection Procedures (Revised Final)

SQP-86-009-X03 XX-85-102-008

  • WBM-85-001-001
    • XX-85-102-011
  • Cencern WBM-85-001-001 addressed in WP-16 SQN.
    • Concern XX-85-102-011 addressed in Welding I-85-735-SQN.

NOTE: QA 80202 was submitted final 1/13/87.

It is being revised to incorporate CATD 80202-SQN-03 and NRC comments.

4941T

9 4

h t

t i

e w

h 4

CONSTRUCTION CATEGORY Ercitstro 2 ECTG WRITER'S GUIDE ELEMENT REPORT FORMAT 1.0 Issue I.

Introduction Characterization II. Summary of Perceived Problem 2.0 Summary IV.

Summary of Findings Conclusions (Portion) 3.0 Evaluators Cover Sheet Information 4.0 Evaluation III.

Evaluation Process Methodology

5.0 Findings

IV.

Summary of Findings 6.0 Root Cause V.

Root Cause

    • Overall Root Cause will (Collective Significance)**

not be considered at this report level.

7.0 Attachments /

VIII. Attachments List of Concerns Other items included VI

  • Corrective Actions in Construction Element (To be provided by Reports line orgainzations)

VII. Generic Appilcability 190$T

OPERATIONS CATEGORY

(

ECTG intITER'S GUIDE OPERATIONS (OP) ELEMENT REPORTS NOTES /COfDIENTS 1.0 Issue I.

Title The brief introduction Characterization Very brief introduction touches on the source of the concerns.

I 2.0 Snemary I.

Title

1. The Conclusions are

}

Very brief introduction towards the end of the findings.

III. Finding (Conclusions)

2. The Conclusions services as a sumanary of the findings.

3.0 Evaluators Cover Sheet

1. The printed name of the original evaluator (s) appears on the cover sheet.
2. The peer reriewer and CEG-H approval signa-1 tures are also on the cover sheet.

f 4.0 Evaluation II. Specific Evaluation Process Nethodology

5.0 Findings

III. Findings

-1880T

i EnclCsure 2 i

i l

j ECTG WRITER'S GUIDE OPERATIONS (OP) EIJtENT REPORTS NOTES /COINEENTS l

i 6.0 Root Cause IV. Root Cause

1. At the element level

}

(Collective Significance) the Root Cause is often j

not identifible.

1

2. Collective significance is not addressed at the element report level.

1

{

7.0 Attachments /

II. Specific Evaluation

1. A list of the concerns List of Concerns Nethodology with text are included I

within this section, j

2. Other reports are sometimes attached.

4

4 I

i r

k I

t 4

'f i

1 4

i I

I I

.i r

I 1

t l

I

)

I i

'l

)

I I

i I

.