ML20207P954

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Ack Receipt of Informing NRC of Steps Taken to Correct Violations Noted in Insp Repts 50-317/86-07 & 50-318/86-07.Security Plan Should Be Revised to Preclude Possible Interpretation of Less Stringent Control
ML20207P954
Person / Time
Site: Calvert Cliffs  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 01/09/1987
From: Martin T
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
To: Tiernan J
BALTIMORE GAS & ELECTRIC CO.
Shared Package
ML20207P955 List:
References
NUDOCS 8701200462
Download: ML20207P954 (2)


See also: IR 05000317/1986007

Text

,

__

_

o-

j

j

..

2,

.

JAN 0 91987

g1cnf.m3 c21GDM

'ccrtifica Ilh/d

N

Doctet Nos. 50-317

50-318

-

L

Baltimore Gas and Electric Company

A1TN: Mr. J. A. Tiernan

Vice President

Nuclear Energy

P. O. Box 1475

Baltimore, Maryland 21203

Gentlemen:

-

Subject: Combined Inspection Nos. 50-317/86-07 and 50-318/86-07

This refers to your letter dated July 1,1986, in response to cur letter dated

June 6, 1986.

,

Thank you for informing us of the corrective and preventive actions that were

documented in your letter.

We have reviewed the information you provided in support of your contention

that your NRC-approved security plan was not violated.

Based upon that review

and the following consideration, we have determined that the violation is

correct as cited.

NRC regulations, specifically 10 CFR 73.55(d)(4) require that a licensee

exercise positive control over designated licensee vehicles to preclude their

unauthorized use. The NRC does not consider observation of an unattended

vehicle by personnel engaged in other work in the vicinity of the vehicle to

constitute " positive control".

NRC's position on positive control of an

!

unattended vehicle, generally, is that the ignition key is removed and/or the

i

vehicle doors are locked, although other methods of posttive control are also

possible.

,

We agree that the commitm9nt in your security plan could be interpreted in such

,

!

a manner es to allow a less stringent control to be exercised. However, that

I

interpretation was not realized when your plan was reviewed and approved by

NRC. Therefore, we suggest that you change your plan to preclude that

interpretation and maintain your stated corrective actions in effect.

Those

actions, if properly implemented, should preclude recurrence of such violations

,

and are acceptable.

i

I

l

The enclosure to your letter is being withheld from public disclosure since it

'

contains Safeguards Information and must be protected in accordance with 10 CFR 73.21.

NN

7

0

0FFICIAL RECORD COPY

RL CC - 0001.0.0

11/25/86

t

\\

$

t

L.

..

.

-.

- - - - - - - -

- - - - . - - - - - .

.

,

.

,

4-

.

'

Baltimore Gas and Electric

2

'JAN O 9 E27

Company

,

Your cooperation with us is appreciated.

Sincerely,

$!L6LDalSigo,g3,,

Thomas T. Martin, Director

Division of Radiation Safety

and Safeguards

cc w/ enc 1:

M. Bowman, General Supervisor, Technical Services Engineering

Thomas Magette, Administrator, Nuclear Evaluations

Daniel Latham, Director, Security Services (Safeguards Only)

Norman J. Bowmaker, Vice President, General Services (Safeguards Only)

Public Document Room (PDR)

Local Public Document Room (LPDR)

Nuclear Safety Information Center (NSIC)

NRC Resident Inspector

State of Maryland (2)

bec w/ enc 1:

Region I Docket Room (with concurrences)

Management Assistant, DRMA (w/o encl)

DRP Section Chief

M. McBride, RI, Pilgrim

T. Kenny, SRI, Salem

D. Jaffe, LPM, NRR

Robert J. Bores, DRSS

..

-

-

..

RI:D

RI:

S

RI RSS

Tri

mm

K

M tin

[,! /E, ..

.N

. .,7

2.,.,,

-

2u

fou -

, ou

t/7/#7

0FFICIAL RECORD COPY

RL CC - 0002.0.0

11/25/86

..

.

.

.

. .

. . .-

-

-.

--- -