ML20207L181

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Insp Rept 50-312/88-23 on 880709-0906 & Notice of Violation.Maint Performed on Auxiliary Feedwater Pump Packing Was Not Carefully Planned & Conducted
ML20207L181
Person / Time
Site: Rancho Seco
Issue date: 09/28/1988
From: Zimmerman R
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V)
To: Firlit J
SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT
Shared Package
ML20207L184 List:
References
NUDOCS 8810170219
Download: ML20207L181 (2)


See also: IR 05000312/1988023

Text

4

4[

.

.

,

.

l

.

,

5:

SEP 2 8 GE3

Docket No. 50-312

Sacramento Municipai utility District

P. O. Box 15830

Sacramento, California 95813

Attention:

Mr

J. F. Firlit

Chief Executive Officer, Nuclear

Gentlemen:

1

Subject:

NAC Inspection of Rancho Seco

This refers to the routine inspection conducted by Hessrs. A 0'Angelo,

C. Myers, W. Ang, C. Clark and P. Qualis of this office on July 9,1988

through September 6, 1988 and of activities authorized by NRC License No.

DPR-54, and to the discussion of our findings held with Mr. Firlit and other

'

members of your staff at the conclusion of the inspection.

Areas examined durirg this inspection are described in the enclosed inspection

report. Within these areas, the inspection consisted of selective

examinations of procedures and representative records, interviews with

personnel, and observations by the inspectors.

Based on the results of this inspection, it appears that one of your

activities were not conducted in full compliance with NRC requirements, as set

'

forth in the Notice of Violation, enclosed herewith as Appendix A.

As discussed in paragraph 8 of this report, the maintenance performed on the

auxiliary feedwater pump packing was not carefully planned and conducted.

l

The root cause investigation conducted by you of this activity was considered

during our evaluation of this activity for enforcement action.

The

investigation appeared to be a self critical, in depth review of the errors

which occurred during this activity.

In your response, please address both

the root cause of these performance errors and your currective action.

Your response to this notice is to be submitted in accordance with the

provisions of 10 CFR 2.201 as stated in Appendix A. Notice of Violation.

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790(a), a copy of this letter and the enclosures

will be placed in the NRC Public Docament Room.

)

Should you have any questions concerning this inspection, we will be glad to

discuss them with you.

'

\\

I

I

8G10170219 000928

PDR

ADOCK 05000312

'

'

/

O

PPM)

- 3

/

/

(

t

1

,

-

- -

-

-

-

- - -

- -

-

- - -

- -

.

.

.

.

.

SEP 0 3

-2-

The responses firected by this letter and the accompanying Notice are not

subject to the clearance procedures of the Office of Management and Budget as

required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, PL 96-5.1.

Sincerely,

t

!

j

';j g 7

] \\ , ,, . '

R. Zirnmerman, Chief

f

Reactor Projects Branch

Enclosures:

A.

Notice of Violation

B.

Inspection Report No. 60-312/88-23

cc w/ enclosures:

J. Vinquist, SMUD

D. Keuter, SMUD

State of California

bec w/ enclosures:

docket file

Resident Inspector

Project Inspector

G. Cook

B. Faulkenbsrry

J. Martin

T. Foley, NRR

bec w/o enclosure 8:

J. Zollicoffer

M. Smith

RE

N

.

, hays

WPAng

[CClark

f

,

AQ

yeld

(# rtyors

2

J

9

88

9 M /88

9/27/88

9/g/88

9/27/88

REQUEST COPY ] REQUEST COPY ] REQUEST COPY ] REQUEST COPY ] REQUEST COPY ]

YEh / NO

] YESj / NO

] YES / NO

] YES / NO

] YES / HO

]

f/ iller

6

e rma..

'3/{ 88

97 5 88

9 x")

'

7

REQUEST COPY ]fREQ Si COPY )

YE5 / NO

7_YES_ / NO

]

C/

.

AtNp TO POR l

YES/ / NO

]

I

,

- - -

. - - - . - - -

-

-

. -

.

.

- - .

.

.

-

- - -

-