ML20207H850
| ML20207H850 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | La Crosse File:Dairyland Power Cooperative icon.png |
| Issue date: | 12/31/1986 |
| From: | Shafer W NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | Taylor J DAIRYLAND POWER COOPERATIVE |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20207H857 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8701080172 | |
| Download: ML20207H850 (3) | |
See also: IR 05000409/1986011
Text
_
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
~
.
a
DEC 311986
Docket No. 50-409
Dairyland Power Cooperative
ATTN: Mr. J. W. Taylor
General Manager
2615 East Avenue - South
La Crosse, WI 54601
Gentlemen:
This refers to the routine safety inspection conducted by Mr. N. Williamsen
and others of this office on December 1-4, 1986, of activities at Lacrosse
Boiling Water Reactor authorized by NRC Operating License No. DPR-45 and to
the discussion of our findings with Mr. Roger Christians and others at the
conclusion of the inspection and per telephone conversation with Mr. Christians
December 8, 10, 12, 15 and 18, 1986.
[
The enclosed copy of our inspection report identifies areas examined during
the inspection. Within these areas, the inspection consisted of a selective
examination of procedures and representative records, observations, and
interviews with personnel.
No violations of NRC requirements were identified during the course of this
inspection. However, weaknesses were identified which will need corrective
action by your staff. These weaknesses are summarized in the attached
Appendix to this letter. As required by 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix E, IV.F.
any weaknesses that are identified must be corrected. Accordingly, please
advise us within 45 days of the date of this letter of the corrective action
you have taken or plan to take, showing the estimated date of completion with
regard to these exercise weaknesses.
In addition, there are open items and
improvement items identified in the attached report.
We are concerned with the lack of progress made in the area of emergency
preparedness at the LACBWR facility.
For the last several years we noted that
your emergency preparedness program was improving; however, the last two
inspections at your facility clearly indicate that more management attention
is needed to resolve the continuing weaknesses that exist in your program.
We understand, from our conference call with Mr. John Parkyn on December 31,
1986, that you will meet with us in our office on January 6, 1987 to discuss
these issues further.
Please note that the next emergency preparedness exercise should include the
objective of demonstrating recovery and reentry management.
NO
09
jh
.\\
a
.
-,
Dairyland Power Cooperative
2
g
We will gladly discuss any questions you have concerning this inspection.
Sincerely,
" Original air ed by W.D. Shafer"
W. D. Shafer, Chief
Radiological Protection Branch
Enclosures:
1.
Appendix, Exercise
Weaknesses
2.
Inspection Report
No. 50-409/86011(DRSS)
cc w/ enclosures:
J. Parkyn, Plant Superintendent
DCS/RSB (RIDS)
Licensing Fee Management Branch
Resident Inspector, RIII
John Stang, NRR
Virgil Kanable, Chief
Boiler Section
Mary Lou Munts, Chairperson
Wisconsin Public Service
Commission
Spark Burmaster, Coulee
Region Energy Coalition
Collette BlumMeister (SLO),
WI Div. of Emergency Government
W. Weaver, FEMA, RV
M. Carroll, FEMA, RVII
D. Matthews, 0IE, EPB
i
RIII 7 c p/2 2l's& pCs5 f
g 65
A
RIII
RIII
RIII
R
,
pT
yIg W
Williamsen/ims
Allen
Snell
Wiw
pr
ss{c/ss
* !
,g
. .
.
. .
. ... - .
-
.
--_
-.
-.
.
.
'
i
I
<
APPENDIX
EXERCISE WEAKNESSES
El.
Communications with the States of Wisconsin and Minnesota were inadequate
in that the scope and content of the information provided was marginally
sufficient to allow the states to formulate appropriate protective actions.
(0 pen Item No. 409/86011-01) (See Section 5.b and 5.e)
<
2.
Notifications to the NRC failed to meet the requirements of
10 CFR 50.72(a)(3) which requires notification immediately after
notification to the State and local agencies, but not later than
one hour after the declaration of an Emergency Class.
(0 pen Item
j
No. 409/86011-02) (Section 5.b)
3.
The Offsite monitoring team demonstrated numerous inadequacies and
failed to find the plume centerline.
(0 pen Item No. 409/86011-04)
,
(See Section 5.d)
i
I
4
f
i
1
4
4
)
l
l
,
- ~ . , . -
,_...r-
-- _ _ . , , _ _ _ . _ . , ,
_ . , . _ . ,
..,_,__,,,,,%.,._m_
r-.-.y
3.,
y
.,,,,,__-- _ ,,_ _
_.-r._,..,,,_,
7, , , _ _ , . . . . . ~ . , , , . . . , . - - . _ - . _ . - _ . , ,