ML20207E006

Notice of Violation from Insp on 860601-30

ML20207E006
Person / Time
Site:	Comanche Peak
Issue date:	12/22/1986
From:	NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To:
Shared Package
ML20207E000	List: ML20207D995 ML20207E006 ML20207E013 ML20207E034
References
50-445-86-15, 50-446-86-12, NUDOCS 8701020034
Download: ML20207E006 (4)

Text

'"

"'W.  %

~

'. m 1 ,J w if. ..

3

% J .g -

N, 1e

.i

( t.

>3

, yg .xp } : ^l y/ ~ -

l '{c jQ , jg ' s .' ,

4

' ,2 f<

h'h - -< .3 - s

. . . z j+

f; y V! w ' i ,. ' a, n' 's' x - ,

' l APPEND'IX'A1 -

f yM'qf ] ,

NOTICE'0F VIOLATIONI 6 Llf, 'l[

m 4 4 ,A}lq' J';}. 1; h

~

7 74 ' '"

E

~

2 Texas Utilities; Electric Company m . -

Lockets:: 50,445/86-15 .

41W~ ' Comanche. Peak, Steam Electric Station: " %J, is n N

~ '

. 1 Units 10and 2: C]1W w;_ W150-446/86-12i 8' '

c. J;' L*- < 1 Permits:'.CPPR-126? "

m, p

s g

4 s

• y;.

3

n. _'

CPPR

, , -127 .

J' g

~"

D,- .~ '

. . .. n J., .' E'Y ~

i A ;Duringlan,NRChinspection conducted on: June 1-30 1986,~six violations of NRC-~

~

g< W requirements were? identified.1The~ violations involved operations travelers not y~~ W ,ibeing. completed"as:. required by procedures; Hilti bolts' not being , installed with 4 '" a torquefwrench;-modifications made to' NEMA Type -4~ enclosures without proper p' 4. design lcontro1 measures;< stainless steel cutting tools contaminated with other

% * . - ; materials; f and absence'of construction ' procedural? modifications requirements;made without relativep(rior to 1) engineering control of material approval; l-  : identification of identkal' parts made in'the.onsite' fabrication shop, R{ q l(2) Unit 1~ paper flow group; issuance of control documents for extended periods,

- andE(3)"designationiof. information to be included on written work. requests for

g .

witemsjfrom the onsite; fabrication shop M In accordance'with the " General i

yW : Statement of: Policy;and Procedure,for NRC Enforcement.- Actions," 10 CFR Part 2, 7 :~ '7v Appendix lCl(1986),(theviolationsareIfstedbelow:

/A> 3 CriterionTV;of; Append.tx B to?10 CFR Part 50, as implemented by P]E g ,A JSection:5.0,-Revision (3, dated July 31, 1984, of the TUGCo Quality F A  : Assurance Plan (QAP), requires that activities affecting. quality shall be

', Nprescribed by:and-accomplished in accordance with documented instructions, 2 procedures, or drawings of a-type appropriate to the circumstances.

' Section 3.2 ofzBrown alRoot (B&R) Procedure CP-CPM 6.3, Revision 11, 3 requires the person completing an operation on a traveler to sign or

~

a<' cinitialj". . . at the completion of each cperation and prior to moving Ep arts or assemblies'to the next scheduled operation."

y' 7

Contrary to;the above~,-travelers for conduit and junction box supports in

,R

^

ithe Unit L2 reactor.bui*iing and safeguards building were routinely left unsigned until an entire conduit run was completed. Travelers were being

- signed-during a " final walkdown" prior to QC inspection, with the person signing the traveler not necessarily the same person who performed the ioperation.

M This is a Severity 1.evel IV violation (Supplement II) (446/8612-V-01).

2 B.. Criterion V of Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 50, as implemented by Section 5.0, Revision 3, dated July 31, 1984, of the TUGCo QAP, requires

~ : that ' activities' affecting quality shall be prescribed by and accomplished

" Lin'accordance with documented instructions, procedures, or drawings of a

^

' ~ type appropriate to the circumstances.

s

%[0hb O

p i

a. - - - - - - - - .

,A . [

d'*v e  ; ,

d h-((

-m

%P _

4

[; ., ;? \ e s " ^

• t:

"'2 s 2- ,

. 1..

2 e ~ Paragraph 3.1.4.'1lof.'B&R Procedure CEI-20,LRevision 9, requires-Hilti

. ' ianchor' bolts to be' set by the usejof a torque wrench at the time of l installation.~

~

? / _

u. _ m . .

_- , N (Contraryfto;the 'above,'Hilti bolts on conduit and junction box supports in

, %f ' the: Unit-2ireactor building.and safeguards building were being installed c Je

~ ~

Losing _an ordinary ratchet' wrench. Torquing of;these bolts was usually 7 performed only onLa "finalJwalkdown" by craftpersons prior to QC

. inspection.

1 This isEa Severity-Level IV' violation (Supplement II)-(446/8612-V-02).

~

'C. " Criterion IIIIof Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 50, as implemented by

_ -Section 3.0,; Revision 3, dated July 31, 1984, of.the TUGCo QAP, requires i,

in.part,1 thatl measures must be established to assure that applicable

>* ? regulatory requirements and design basis, as' defined in Part 50.2 and as ,

• 6 '

,specifled in the-license application ~,~ for those structures, systems, and fcomponents to which this appendix applies, are correctly translated into

specifications,. drawings,-procedures, and instructions. The design ,

controlineasures must' provide for.. verifying or checking the adequacy of

. Ldesign, such-as by the performance of design. reviews, by the use of falternate or simplified calculational methods, or by the performance of a suitable testing program. In addition, design changes, including field 7

, changes,(must be subject to. design control measures commensurate with

=

.m 7 those applied to the original design. ,

c _

Section 1.6'o'f Appendix B to Gibbs & Hill (G&H) Specification 2323-ES-100, '

. Revision'2, and.Section 3.6.1 of B&R Procedure ECP-19A, Revision 2, both

] . require NEMA Type 4 enclosures..in the reactor building.

Contrary ~to the above, enclosures are installed in the Unit 2 reactor building which have been modified. The modifications occurred with no design control'and without verification that the modified enclosures meet the design requirements.

This is.a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement II) (446/8612-V-03).

-D.  : Criterion V of Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 50, as implemented by

~~Section 5.0, Revision 3, dated July 31, 1984, of the TUGCo QAP, requires that activities affecting quality shall be prescribed by and accomplished

.in accordance with documented instructions, procedures, or drawings of a type appropriate to the circumstances.

Section 2.20.5 of G&H Specification 2323-ES-100, Revision 2, and

Section-3.6.1 of B&R Procedure CP-CPM-7.3, Revision 1, require that tools

, used"on stainless steel materials shall not be contaminated by use on

.other materials.

c M

V

"* 4- -- , , , - . 4 - , , , . - . . _ .- . . _ _ . - - , , .-~,~~..r,-,, ,,...-_,-.,.._,,e , - - . . . . . . - ,..---m-. , , . . , _ _ . _ , . - - , _ , . ,

v v. e ;y , , ,

yq;e/ ~

'y; Q[p.y '

a -

M

&^

t

.' 3

, k

' ,_ f ,. _

4 -~ Contrary to.the:above, tools-~used.to cut stainless steel flexible conduit were:also used on carbon steel conduit and other items.

1 1This?isla Seve ity Level'Vl violation (Supplement II)-(446/8612-V-04).

v -

N,

$ SE. :CriterionTofAppendixB'to'.10CFRPart50,asimplementedby Section 5.0,nRevision 3, dated July ~31, 1984, of the TUGCo QAP, requires fw N ;that' activities affecting. quality shall-be prescribed by and accomplished g

, fin:accordance with; documented < instructions, procedures, or drawings of'a y W s itype7 appropriate to;the circumstances.

~

[B&RProcedureCP-CPM 4.1,KRevision0,requiresthatworkactivitiesshall 1be: suspended when design drawings and specifications cannot be complied

, :with and a design change shal.1 be requested from engineering. Work may

(. _ Lresume'.after receipt of the approved design change document.

, m ,

~

} Contsary:Lto the aboie, examples .have been identified with-respect to

~

J ,

' . _.T, . conduit and junction box' supports-in which work ~was not suspended when

design; drawings ^and. specifications could'not be complied'with, and modifications were made without prior engineering approval and the e required appropriate design documents. '

ThisLis a Severity? Level;IV violation-(Supplement II) (446/8612-V-05).

1 F. -Criterion'V of. Appendix B:to.10 CFR Part 50, as implemented by Section 5.0, Revision 3,~ dated July 31,_1984, of the TUGCo QAP, requires that activities

, .affecting quality shall be' prescribed by and accomplished in accordance

- with-documented instructions, procedures, or drawings of a type appropriate to the circumstances.

4 Contrary to the above:

'1. - No procedures or instructions existed for Unit 1 paper flow group (PFG) to control design documents (e.g., drawings) issued for extended periods. B&R Procedure CP-CPM-6.3 only specifies controls ifor such documents issued on a daily basis. NRC inspection of 50

- -- Edesign documents issued'to the onsite fabrication shop for extended

= - ' periods found them to be maintained current; however, there were no procedures documenting how this activity was to be accomplished. NRC

-inspection'of the Unit 2 PFG procedures found that the procedures for control of. documents issued for extended periods were documented.

. ' ~

This is a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement II)

-(445/8615-V-06).

-, ( .

No procedures or instructions existed to control the activity by

.2.

4~-

iwhich the'onsite fabrication shop provides identification for-identical items fabricated in the shop. This identification ic necessary to assure that quality control inspections are trace le to A

c

py ;

p[r ;

E s, ,

e, ,

Nk 4 h ,' , _

4 HN ~

. .theLitems inspected. (Traceability of inspections is presently being informally accomplished by stamping the' inspection. report number on the item when inspection is complete.:

J 1- a *Thisis'aShverityLevelIVviolation-(SupplementII)(445/8615V07; - -

.f _ '446/8612-V-07).

[ 3.- B&R Procedures CP-CPM-1.3A, Revision 0, and CP-CPM-8.1, Revision 3, i- '

.did not provide instructions relative to defining what information

(- s

_ must be' incit.ded on written . requests to the 'casite fabrication shop for5 fabricated items. For example, the onsite fabrication shop has received requests for fabricated items on three-part memos that did not spe::ify whether. the item was: Q or~ non-Q, ASME or non-ASME, its

-location and intended use, and whether it was temporary or permanent.

LThis information is necessary to assure compliance with QA

.reOsirements.

-This is a Severity Level IV violation (Supple' ment II) (445/8615-V-08; 446/8612-V-08). .

LPur'suant to the provisions .of'10'CFR 2.201, Texas Utilities Electric Company is t , hereby required to submit to this office, within 30 days of the date of the

.. letter transmitting this Notice, a written statement or explanation in reply, kw . including for each violati'on: (1) the reasons for the violations if admitted,

' ~

2)thecorrectivesteps-whichhavebeentaken'andtheresultsachieved,

3) the corrective-steps which will be taken to avoid further violations, and

4) the_date when full compliance will be achieved. Where good cause is shown,

consideration may be given to extending your response time.

' Dated at' Arlington, Texas, ~

this 22nd day of December 1986 ,

w

, g ,

l: a, .

[ ~ ~ , - <

f 9

4 f