ML20207D995
| ML20207D995 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Comanche Peak  |
| Issue date: | 12/22/1986 |
| From: | Johnson E NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | Counsil W TEXAS UTILITIES ELECTRIC CO. (TU ELECTRIC) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20207E000 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8701020031 | |
| Download: ML20207D995 (4) | |
See also: IR 05000445/1986015
Text
y
-
--
(
w
. g
-
,
'
F
,
In' Reply; Refer To:
Docket:
50-445/86?15-
.50-446/86-12-
DFC 22 E
. Texas Utilities Generating' Company
s
ATTN: Mr. W. G. Counsil
Executive Vice President
400. North Olive Street, L.B. 81
Dallas, Texas. ~75201
Gentlemen:
!
'
'This refers to the inspection conducted by Mr. I. Barnes and other members of
the Region IV Comanche Peak Group during the period June 1-30, 1986, of
activities authorized by NRC Construction Permits CPPR-126 and CPPR-127 for the
,
Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station, Units 1 and 2, and to the respective
discussion of our findings with Messrs J. W. Beck'and L. D. Nace, and other
members of your staff at the conclusion of the inspection.
Areas examined during the inspection included Comanche Peak Response Team
activities and assessment of allegations. Within these areas, the inspection
consisted of selective examination of procedures and representative records,
interviews with personnel, and observations by the inspectors.
The inspection
findings are documented in the enclosed inspection report.
During this inspection, it was found that certain of your activities were in
-violation of NRC requirements.
Consequently, you are required to respond to
these' violations, in writing, in accordance with the provisions of
Section 2.201 of the NRC's " Rules of Practice," Part 2, Title 10, Code of
Federal. Regulations. Your response should be based on the specifics contained
in the Notice of Violation enclosed with this letter.
Also.during this inspection, it was found that certain of your activities
appeared to deviate from commitments made to the NRC.
These items and
references to the connitments are identified in the enclosed Notice of
Deviation.
You are requested to respond to these deviations in writing.
Your
response should be based on the specifics contained in the Notice of Deviation
. enclosed with this letter.
We have also examined actions you have taken with regard to previously
identified inspection findings.
The status of these items is identified in
paragraph 2 of the enclosed report.
.The responses directed by this letter and the accompanying Notices are not
subject to the clearance procedures of the Office of Management and Budget as
required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, PL 96-511.
Y
ACh
RIV:CPRT
D:DRSP
IBarnes/tw
TEHJojinson
EEmerson
VSNoonan
RLSpessard
,2//0/86
p/%/86
s /6 /86
/2 /2t/86
/ /86
'
@
)
p&)
8701020031 861222
'
ADOCK 05000445
Ip
L,Ql
/
0
I
'
.4
Texas Utilities Generating Company-
-2-
r
Should you have any questions concerning this inspection, we will be pleased to
discuss them with you.
Sincerely,
orWnsISigried B/[
$/b//
E. H. Johnson, Director
Division of Reactor Safety
and Projects
Enclosures:
1.
Appendix A - Notice of Violation
2.
Appendix B - Notice of Deviation
3.
Appendix C - NRC Comanche Peak Response
Team Activities Inspection Report
50-445/86-15
50-446/86-12
cc w/ enclosures.
Texas Utilities Electric Company
ATTN:
G. S. Keeley, Manager
Licensing
Skyway Tower
400 North Olive Street
Lock Box 81
Dallas, Texas
75201
Juanita Ellis
President - CASE
1426 South Polk Street
Dallas, Texas- 75224
Renea Hicks
Assistant Attorney General
Environmental Protection Division
P. O. Box 12548
Administrative Judge Peter Bloch
U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Washington, D. C.
20555
Elizabeth B. Johnson
Administrative Judge
Oak Ridge National Laboratory
P. O. Box X, Building 3500
Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37830
r
,
Texas Utilities Generating Company
-3-
Dr.:Kenneth A. McCollom
1107 West Knapp
Stillwater, Oklahoma 74075
Dr. Walter H. Jordan
881 Outer-Drive
Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37830
Anthony Roisman, Esq.
Executive Director
Trial Lawyers for Public Justice
2000 P. Street, N.W., Suite 611
Washington, D. C. 20036
Texas Radiation Control Program Director
bec to DMB (IE01)
bec distrib. by RIV:
- RPB
- MIS System
- RRI-0PS
- RSTS Operator
- RRI-CONST
- R&SPB
- T. F. Westerman, RIV
DRSP
- I.
Barnes, CPTG
R. Martin, RA
V. Noonan, NRR
- RSB
- RIV File
J. Taylor, IE
- D. Weiss, LFMB (AR-2015)
R. Heishman, IE
S. Treby, ELD
M. Emerson, AC
- w/766
,7
-.
-
467 y, < v :
,
vx[ wl* I .
~
,w
-
/
^
i [
,
JIAReplylReferT'o':=
-
-
W'
- Docket:-- 50-445/86-15
50-446/86-12-
q4
-
.
.
A
jTexasUtilities'GeneratingCompany
s
? ATTN:: . Mr. :W. : G.': Counsil
..L'
'
,
.
ExecutiveEVice President:
- f400. North.0 live Street, L.B. 81
x
Dallas,3 exas7 75201
T
j(Gentlemen:
,
LThis refers to the inspection conducted by Mr. I. .Barnes and other members of
>the. Region._IV Comanche Peak Group during;the period June 1-30, 1986, of
Jactivities. authorized by NRC Construction ~ Permits CPPR-126 and CPPR-127 for the
~ Comanche. Peak 5 team Electric. Station,- Units 1 and 2, and to the respective
+
1
- N
~ ~ discussion ~ of our findings with Messrs J. W. Beck and L. D. Nace, ard' other
. members of your, staff.at the conclusion of the inspection.
-
.Areasle'xaminediduring the: inspection included Comanche P.eak Response Team
.activitiestand assessment of allegations. Within these areas, the inspection
~
! consisted of selective. examination of procedures and representative records,
,L
'finterviews with personnel, and observations by the inspectors. The inspection
findingsLare documented'in the enclosed inspection report.
Y
-
p"
~
,
.
LDuring this inspection, 'it was found that certain of your activities were in
^
'
. violation of _NRC requirements. Consequently, you are required to respond to
'
(
these violations, in writing, in accordance with the provisions of
>
Section 2.'201 of the NRC's " Rules of Practice," Part 2, Title 10, Code of
. Federal Regulations.'- Your response should be based on the specifics contained
-
- in the Notice of Violation enclosed with this letter.
-
-
- Also during this inspection, it was found that certain of your activities
-appeared to deviate from comitments made to the NRC. These items and
references to the' commitments are identified in the enclosed "otice of
- Deviation.: You are requested to respond to these deviations in writing.
Your
. response should be' based on the specifics contained in the Notice of Deviation
. enclosed with this letter.
,
,We have alv> examined actions you have taken with regard to previously
' identified inspection findings. The status of these items is identified in
-paragrapn-2 of.the enclosed report.
LThe'. responses directed by this letter and the accompanying Notices are not
subject to 'the clearance procedures of the Office of Management and Budget as
required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, PL 96-511.
I.
T
IE f
! RIV:CPRT
D:DRSP
IBarnes/tw
EHJohnson
MEEmerson
VSNoonan
RLSph sard
'
- / /86
/ /86
/ /86
/ /86
// /
86
i
-
r
, -
_ . + , . ,
,.r
. . _ , , , _ _ . , , ,
. _ . . _ , , , , - _ _ . . - . . _ _ . - - . . _ . _ . _ _ .
-
. . , _ . . . . _ . -
.
-