ML20207D995

Forwards Insp Repts 50-445/86-15 & 50-446/86-12 on 860601-30 & Notices of Violation & Deviation.Areas Examined Include Comanche Peak Response Team Activities & Assessment of Allegations

ML20207D995
Person / Time
Site:	Comanche Peak
Issue date:	12/22/1986
From:	Johnson E NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To:	Counsil W TEXAS UTILITIES ELECTRIC CO. (TU ELECTRIC)
Shared Package
ML20207E000	List: ML20207D995 ML20207E006 ML20207E013 ML20207E034
References
NUDOCS 8701020031
Download: ML20207D995 (4)

See also: IR 05000445/1986015

Text

y -

--

(

'

w .g -

,

F

,

In' Reply; Refer To:

Docket: 50-445/86?15-

.50-446/86-12- DFC 22 E

s

. Texas Utilities Generating' Company

ATTN: Mr. W. G. Counsil

Executive Vice President

400. North Olive Street, L.B. 81

Dallas, Texas. ~75201

Gentlemen:

!

'

'This refers to the inspection conducted by Mr. I. Barnes and other members of

the Region IV Comanche Peak Group during the period June 1-30, 1986, of

,

activities authorized by NRC Construction Permits CPPR-126 and CPPR-127 for the

Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station, Units 1 and 2, and to the respective

discussion of our findings with Messrs J. W. Beck'and L. D. Nace, and other

members of your staff at the conclusion of the inspection.

Areas examined during the inspection included Comanche Peak Response Team

activities and assessment of allegations. Within these areas, the inspection

consisted of selective examination of procedures and representative records,

interviews with personnel, and observations by the inspectors. The inspection

findings are documented in the enclosed inspection report.

During this inspection, it was found that certain of your activities were in

-violation of NRC requirements. Consequently, you are required to respond to

these' violations, in writing, in accordance with the provisions of

Section 2.201 of the NRC's " Rules of Practice," Part 2, Title 10, Code of

Federal. Regulations. Your response should be based on the specifics contained

in the Notice of Violation enclosed with this letter.

Also.during this inspection, it was found that certain of your activities

appeared to deviate from commitments made to the NRC. These items and

references to the connitments are identified in the enclosed Notice of

Deviation. You are requested to respond to these deviations in writing. Your

response should be based on the specifics contained in the Notice of Deviation

. enclosed with this letter.

We have also examined actions you have taken with regard to previously

identified inspection findings. The status of these items is identified in

paragraph 2 of the enclosed report.

.The responses directed by this letter and the accompanying Notices are not

subject to the clearance procedures of the Office of Management and Budget as

required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, PL 96-511.

Y

RIV:CPRT D:DRSP ACh NRR IE

IBarnes/tw TEHJojinson EEmerson VSNoonan RLSpessard

'

,2//0/86

p/%/86 s /6 /86 /2 /2t/86 / /86

@ ) p&)

8701020031 861222 '

PDR ADOCK 05000445 Ip /

L,Ql

0 PDR

I

'

.4

Texas Utilities Generating Company- -2-

r

Should you have any questions concerning this inspection, we will be pleased to

discuss them with you.

Sincerely,

orWnsISigried B/[

$/b//

E. H. Johnson, Director

Division of Reactor Safety

and Projects

Enclosures:

1. Appendix A - Notice of Violation

2. Appendix B - Notice of Deviation

3. Appendix C - NRC Comanche Peak Response

Team Activities Inspection Report

50-445/86-15

50-446/86-12

cc w/ enclosures.

Texas Utilities Electric Company

ATTN: G. S. Keeley, Manager

Licensing

Skyway Tower

400 North Olive Street

Lock Box 81

Dallas, Texas 75201

Juanita Ellis

President - CASE

1426 South Polk Street

Dallas, Texas- 75224

Renea Hicks

Assistant Attorney General

Environmental Protection Division

P. O. Box 12548

Austin, Texas 78711 - 2548

Administrative Judge Peter Bloch

U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Washington, D. C. 20555

Elizabeth B. Johnson

Administrative Judge

Oak Ridge National Laboratory

P. O. Box X, Building 3500

Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37830

!

r , l

l

!

l

l

Texas Utilities Generating Company -3- l

Dr.:Kenneth A. McCollom

1107 West Knapp

Stillwater, Oklahoma 74075

Dr. Walter H. Jordan

881 Outer-Drive

Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37830

Anthony Roisman, Esq.

Executive Director

Trial Lawyers for Public Justice

2000 P. Street, N.W., Suite 611

Washington, D. C. 20036

Texas Radiation Control Program Director

bec to DMB (IE01)

bec distrib. by RIV:

• RPB * MIS System

• RRI-0PS *RSTS Operator

• RRI-CONST *R&SPB

• T. F. Westerman, RIV DRSP

• I. Barnes, CPTG R. Martin, RA

V. Noonan, NRR *RSB

• RIV File J. Taylor, IE

• D. Weiss, LFMB (AR-2015) R. Heishman, IE

S. Treby, ELD M. Emerson, AC

• w/766

-. -

,7

467 y, < v : ,

~

,w

vx[ wl* I . -

/

^

i [ *

,

- -

JIAReplylReferT'o':=

W'  : Docket:-- 50-445/86-15

50-446/86-12-

q4

-

. .

A jTexasUtilities'GeneratingCompany '

s  :

,  ? ATTN:: . Mr. :W. : G.': Counsil ..L'

.

ExecutiveEVice President:

- f400. North.0 live Street, L.B. 81

x Dallas,3 Texas7 75201

• j(Gentlemen: ,

LThis refers to the inspection conducted by Mr. I. .Barnes and other members of

>the. Region._IV Comanche Peak Group during;the period June 1-30, 1986, of

Jactivities. authorized by NRC Construction ~ Permits CPPR-126 and CPPR-127 for the

+ ~ Comanche. Peak 5 team Electric. Station,- Units 1 and 2, and to the respective

1

N ~ ~ discussion ~ of our findings with Messrs J. W. Beck and L. D. Nace, ard' other

. members of your, staff.at the conclusion of the inspection.

- .Areasle'xaminediduring the: inspection included Comanche P.eak Response Team

.activitiestand assessment of allegations. Within these areas, the inspection

~

! consisted of selective. examination of procedures and representative records,

,L 'finterviews with personnel, and observations by the inspectors. The inspection

Y -

findingsLare documented'in the enclosed inspection report.

p" ,

.

LDuring this inspection, 'it was found that certain of your activities were in

^ ~

'

'

( . violation of _NRC requirements. Consequently, you are required to respond to

>

these violations, in writing, in accordance with the provisions of

Section 2.'201 of the NRC's " Rules of Practice," Part 2, Title 10, Code of

. Federal Regulations.'- Your response should be based on the specifics contained

-

in the Notice of Violation enclosed with this letter.

-

-

- Also during this inspection, it was found that certain of your activities

-appeared to deviate from comitments made to the NRC. These items and

references to the' commitments are identified in the enclosed "otice of

Deviation.: You are requested to respond to these deviations in writing. Your

. response should be' based on the specifics contained in the Notice of Deviation

. enclosed with this letter.

,

,We have alv> examined actions you have taken with regard to previously

' identified inspection findings. The status of these items is identified in

-paragrapn-2 of.the enclosed report.

LThe'. responses directed by this letter and the accompanying Notices are not

subject to 'the clearance procedures of the Office of Management and Budget as

required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, PL 96-511.

T

I.

'

! RIV:CPRT D:DRSP

EHJohnson

AC NRR IE f

RLSph sard

IBarnes/tw MEEmerson VSNoonan

/ /86 / /86 / /86 / /86 // / 86

i

- r , - _ . + , . , ,.r . . _ , , , _ _ . , , , . _ . . _ , , , , - _ _ . . - . . _ _ . - - . . _ . _ . _ _ .

.

-

- . . , _ . . . . _ . -