ML20206Q652

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Insp Rept 50-482/87-06 on 870301-31.Violations Noted:Fire Door 34031 Blocked Open & Unattended W/O Necessary Fire Impairment Permit Form Being Issued.Unresolved Item Identified
ML20206Q652
Person / Time
Site: Wolf Creek Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation icon.png
Issue date: 04/15/1987
From: Bruce Bartlett, Boardman J, Cummins J, Hunter D
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
To:
Shared Package
ML20206Q630 List:
References
50-482-87-06, 50-482-87-6, NUDOCS 8704220012
Download: ML20206Q652 (9)


See also: IR 05000482/1987006

Text

. _ ,

_ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

,

,.

APPENDIX B

U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

REGION IV

NRC Inspection Report:

50-482/87-06

LP:

NPF-42

Docket:

50-482

Licensee: Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation (WCNOC)

P. O. Box 411

Burlington, Kansas 66839

Facility Name: Wolf Creek Generating Station (WCGS)

Inspection At: Wolf Creek Site, Coffey County, Burlington, Kansas

Inspection Conducted: March 1-31, 1987

A.d

Y/

87

Inspectors:

.

,. E. Cdmmins, Senior Resident Inspector,

/ Date

/

Operations

///

km knYb

v//'//97

~

B. L. Bartlect, Resident Reactor Inspector,

Dat'e

'

Operations

Ik h

-

x

R. Boirdman, Reactor Inspector,

Date

peration Section, Reactor Safety Branch

~

/587

Approved:

A

w

D.7 . Hunter, Chief, Reactor Project

Date

Section B, Reactor Projects Branch

f

G

. - - -

. - _ - - _ . .

_

._

_ . _ - -

,-

. _ . _ . - . _

. - _ .

.

- _ - .

-

, ,

2

Inspection Summary

Inspection Conducted March 1-31, 1987 (Report 50-482/87-06)

Areas Inspected: Routine, unannounced inspection including _ plant status,

operational. safety verification, monthly surveillance observation, monthly

maintenance observation, onsite event followup, corrective action, and

licensee event reports.

Results: Within the seven areas inspected, one violation was identified

(fire door blocked open, paragraph 4). One unresolved item is identified

in paragraph 4.

,

)

i

l

l

..,1

,

e

3

'

DETAILS

1.

Persons Contacted

Principal Licensee Personnel

  • G. D. Boyer, Plant Manager

0. L. Maynard, Manager of Licensing

  • C. M. Estes, Superintendent of Operations

.

M. D. Rich, Superintendent of Maintenance

  • M. G. Williams, Superintendent of Regulatory, Quality, and

Administrative Services

W. J. Rudolph, QA Manager-WCGS

,

  • A. A. Freitag, Manager, Nuclear Plant Engineering-WCGS

'

M. Nichols, Plant Support Superintendent

  • K. Peterson, Licensing
  • G. Pendergrass, Licensing
  • W. M. Lindsay, Supervisor Quality Systems

C. J. Hoch, QA Technologist

The NRC inspectors also contacted other members of the licensee's staff

during the inspection period to discuss identified issues.

  • Denotes those personnel in attendance at the exit meeting held on

April 1, 1987.

2.

Plant Status

The plant operated in Mode 1 during this inspection period.

3.

Followup of Previously NRC Identified Items

(Closed) Violation (482/8608-03):

Failure to Adequately Perform TS

Surveillance Requirement.

This violation identified a situation where the stroke distance on two

valves was adjusted improperly to meet the stroke time requirements. The

NRC inspector reviewed the following documents to verify that the valve

stroke distance was corrected and that no other valves had been modified

in the same manner: WCGS. Internal Operations Program Deficiency 86-02,

Plant Modification Request 01669, Work Request (WR) 01694-86, and

Engineering Evaluation Request 86-AL-01. This violation is closed.

r

,

\\

. o

(i

4

(Closed) Open Item (482/8605-02):

Essential Service Water Inside

Auxiliary Feedwater System.

3

i

This open item was being.used to track the licensee's actions following

the inadvertent introduction of ' essential service water into portions of

the auxiliary feedwater system (AFW). The licensee flushed the AFW system

and during the first refueling outage all steam generat]rs were sludge

lanced. This open item is closed.

(Closed) Violation (482/8613-02):

Data Not Recorded On a Work Request

(WR) As Required.

+:

This violation concerned a completed WR which did not have all the data

,

recorded that was required. The NRC inspector verified that the violation '

had been placed in the electrical and mechanical maintenance required

reading program. Mechanical maintenance had completed the required

-

reading, while electrical maintenance was nearly finished with the

required reading. This violation is closed.

4.

Operational Safety Verification

The NRC inspectors verified that the facility is being operated safely and

in conformance with regulatory requirements by direct observation of

licensee facilities, tours of the facility, interviews and discussions

with licensee personnel, independent verification of safety system status

and limiting conditions for operations, and reviewing facility records.

The NRC inspectors, by observation of randomly selected activities and

interview of personnel verified that physical security, radiation

protection, and fire protection activities were controlled.

By observing accessible components for correct valve position and

electrical breaker position, and by observing control room indication, the

NRC inspectors confirmed the operability of the safety injection system.

The NRC inspectors also visually inspected safety components for leakage,

physical damage, and otner 1mpairments that could prevent them from

performing their designed functions.

Selected NRC inspector observations are discussed below:

On March 25, 1987, during a routine tour of the control room, the NRC

inspector reviewed three Wolf Creek Work Request (WR) that had been

written on containment isolation valves.

The WRs were on Valves

BG HV-8105, GT HZ-6 and LF FV-96 and were written to inspect and

~

repair, as necessary, valve internals during the next refueling

outage. Retest instructions were written to perform local leak rate

tests (LLRT). Upon questioning Results Engineering personnel, the

NRC inspector determined that the valves had exhibited some leakage

s

during the last LLRT, but that the leakage was within acceptance

criteria and that the maintenance was to be performed as a

precaution.

-

.

,.

.. c

&

5

The licensee stated that an 'as-found' LLRT would not be performed

prior to maintenance. The 10 CFR Part 50,_ Appendix J, section III.c.

requirements state. in part, "Each valve to be tested shall be closed

by normal operation and without any preliminary exercising or

adjustments '. . . ." The NRC inspector informed the licensee that in

his opinion Section III.c required that the valves be tested in the

'as-found' condition and that a LLRT should be performed prior to

valve internal maintenance.

Pending further review, this item will

remain unresolved (482/8706-02).

On March 4, 1987, during a routine tour of the 2016 ft. elevation of

the control building, the NRC inspector observed that TS Fire Door

,

34031~had an air' hose running through it, blocking it open and

3

thereby preventing it from performing its design function. After

checking the surrounding area and not finding any workers, the NRC

inspector called the control room supervisor operator (S0). The SO

stated that'no fire impairment permit had been issued for Door 34031.

-

,

As the NRC inspector was leaving the area, a worker was seen

N..

adjusting the air hose. . Upon questioning, the worker stated he had

'

i

blocked the door open with his air hose in order to reach the only

air connection on that floor and that he had not initiated an

'

1

impairment permit. This failure to get a fire impairment permit as

required by plant procedures is an apparent violation (482/8706-01).

fc

5.

Monthly Surveillance Observation

The NRC inspectors observed selected portions of the performance of

surveillance testing and/or reviewed completed surveillance test

s

procedures to verify that surveillance activities were performed in

accordance with TS requirements and administrative procedures. The NRC

inspectors considered the following elements while inspecting surveillance

. 11

activities:

o

Testing was being accomplished by qualified personnel in accordance

with an approved procedure

i

o

The surveillance procedure conformed to TS requirements

o

Required test instrumentation was calibrated

,

o

Technical Speciffcation limiting conditions for operation (LCO) were

satisfied

-

O

Test data was accurate and complete. Where appropriate, the NRC

o

inspectors performed independent calculations of selected test data

to verify their accuracy

~

The performance of the surveillance procedure conformed to applicable

o

.'

administrative procedures

,

--%

.,

,.

_

d

w

..

6

o

lhe surveillance was performed within the required frequency and the

test results met the required limits.

Surveillances witnessed and/or reviewed by the NRC inspectors are listed

below:

o

STS BG-001, Revision 3, " Boron Injection Flow Path Verification,"

performed on December 27, 1986

o

STS BG-003, Revision 3, '"Boration System Flow Rate Verification,"

performed on October 17, 1986

No violations or deviations were identified.

6.

Monthly Maintenance Observation

The NRC inspector observed maintenance activities performed on

safety-related systems and components to verify that these activities were

conducted in accordance with approved procedures, Technical

Specifications, and applicable industry codes and standards. The

following elements were considered by the NRC inspector during the

observation and/or review of the maintenance activities:

,

o

LCOs were met and, where applicable, redundant components were

operable

o

Activities complied with adequate administrative controls

o

Where required, adequate, approved, and up-to-date procedures were

used

o

Craftsmen were qualified to accomplish the designated task and

technical expertise (i.e., engineering, health physics, operations)

was made available when appropriate

o

Replacement parts and materials being used were properly certified

o

Required radiological controls were implemented

o

Fire prevention controls were implemented where appropriate

o

Required alignments and surveillances to verify post maintenance

operability were performed

o

Quality control hold points and/or checklists were used when

appropriate and quality control personnel observed designated work

activities

Selected portions of the maintenance activities accomplished on the work

requests listed below were observed and related documentation reviewed by

the NRC inspector:

. - .

-

__

-

..

-- ..-

.

_.

__

.:.

7

.

o

WR 52341-86,." Annual Maintenance Of Para Blade Isolation Dampers"

o

"WR 00727-87, " Para Blade Isolation Damper GGD-019"

No violations or deviations were identified.

j.

2

7.

Onsite Event Followup

The NRC inspector performed onsite followup of a nonemergency event that

occurred during this report period. The NRC inspector reviewed control

room logs and discussed the event with cognizant personnel.

The NRC

,

' inspector verified the licensee had responded to the event in accordance

with procedures and had notified the NRC and other agencies as required in

,

,

a timely fashion. An engineered safety feature actuation that occurred

F

during the. report period is listed in the table below. The NRC inspector

!

will review the LER for this event and will report any findings in a

subsequent NRC inspection report.

,

'

Date

Event

Plant Status

Cause

3/09/87

CRVIS*

Mode 1

Spurious spike

i

  • Control Room Ventilation Isolation System

No violations or deviations were identified.

8.

Corrective ~ Action

The NRC inspector discussed with licensee personnel the corrective action

aspects of licensee management systems and procedures.

No violations or deviations were identified.

9.

Review of Licensee Event Report (LER)

>

'

During this inspection period, the NRC inspectors performed followup on

Wolf Creek LERs. The LERs were reviewed to ensure:

o

Corrective action stated in the report has been properly completed or

work is in progress.

o

Response to the event was adequate.

o

Response to the event met license conditions, commitments, or other

applicable regulatory requirements.

o

The information contained in the report satisfied applicable

reporting requirements,

o

Generic issues were identified.

._

,

y

. . . .

.

8

The LERs discussed below were reviewed and closed:

LER 482/86-057: Unplanned Engineered Safety Features Actuation During

Surveillance Testing,

ihisLERreportedaneventwherean.unplannedTrainAandB-fuelbuilding

ventilation isolation signal (FBVIS) and Train A control room ~ ventilation

isolation signal (CRVIS).were initiated because of.the presence of a trip.

-signal from Radiation Monitor GG RE-27. The trip signal was generated by-

the simultaneous. performance of two surveillance tests and a personnel-

error in removing GG RE-27 from the bypass condition. The LER was made

required reading for operating personnel.

LER-482/86-053: Delay In Establishing Required Fire Watch For Fire

Protection Impairment.

This LER reported an event where the shift supervisor (SS) issued an

impairment control permit to establish an hourly fire watch patrol of an

auxiliary feedwater alternate supply valve to compensate for the removal

of the fire barrier enclosure around the valve, but failed to notify the

fire watch patrol to add the area to their watch. The LER was made

required reading for operating personnel.

LER 482/86-050: TS Violation Caused By Incomplete' Closure Of Fire Door.

'

This LER reported an event where an NRC inspector on a routine plant tour

discovered a fire door had been blocked open and unattended. . It was later

determined that contractor personnel had been holding the door open for

ventilation while cleaning up a charcoal spill, but on leaving the area

for shift turnover had left the door open. Discussions were held with the

involved personnel and their foreman emphasized the importance of TS fire

barriers.

In addition, TS fire doors have been posted.

10. Unresolved Item

j

Unresolved items are ir.atters about which more information is required in

order to ascertain whether they are acceptable items, items of

noncompliance, or deviations. An unresolved item disclosed during the

inspection is discussed in paragraph 4.

~

'

i

i

11. Exit Meeting

i

The NRC inspectors met with licensee personnel to discuss the scope and

4

j

findings of this inspection on April 1,1987. The NRC inspectors also

attended entrance / exit meetings of the NRC region-based inspectors

'

identified below:

,

l

l

_ _ _ _ _. _ _ ,_,_._ _._.. _ _ _

.

-.

.

.

... .

.

.

._.

~

_ ~.

-

. . - . . , .

i

9-

Inspection

Lead.

Area

Inspection

'

!

Period

Inspector

Inspected.

Report No.

03/02-06/87

B. Nicholas

Transportation

87-08

and Solid Rad-

waste Activities

03/02-06/87

J. Kelly

Security

87-07

03/16-17/87'

J. Boardman

Corrective Action 87-06

Program

,

4

i

i

1

4

i

i

-

t

. . . - , , - - .

,,- - - ..._ ,,,. - , - ..,,..-, --,_ ..., . - , ,-..

.- ..-- ,.., ...-,.. - - -- .. - ,_..-. - -- - _