ML20206P529
| ML20206P529 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Fermi  |
| Issue date: | 06/23/1986 |
| From: | Hind J NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | Agosti F DETROIT EDISON CO. |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20206P534 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8607020147 | |
| Download: ML20206P529 (2) | |
See also: IR 05000341/1986014
Text
-
7)Mli
bNNNNNb
JUN 2 31986
Docket No. 50-341
The Detroit Edison Company
ATTN:
Frank E. Agosti
Vice President
Nuclear Operations
6400 North Dixie Highway
Newport, MI 48166
Gentlemen:
This refers to the reactive physical security inspection conducted by
Messrs. T. J. Madeda and G. L. Pirtle of this office on April 28 to May 30,
1986, of activities at the Enrico Fermi Atomic Power Plant, Unit 2, authorized
by NRC Operating License No. NPF-43 and to the discussion of our findings
with Mr. J. Piana and other members of your staff at the conclusion of the
inspection.
The enclosed copy of our inspection report identifies areas examined during
the inspection. Within these areas, the inspection consisted of a selective
examination of procedures and representative records, observations, and
interviews with personnel.
During this inspection, certain of your activities appeared to be in violation
of NRC requirements, as specified in the enclosed Notice. A written response
is required.
Inspection results identified two concerns that require immediate senior security
management attention. The first concern is identified in Paragraph 8 of the
enclosed report and refers to a significant weakness regarding your package
access control program. The second concern is addressed in Paragraphs 6
and 9 of the enclosed report and addresses the apparent lack of aggressive
and comprehensive action to assure that corrective actions for identified
deficiencies are sufficient to prevent recurrence.
Areas examined during this inspection concern a subject matter which is exempt
from disclosure according to Part 73, Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations,
Section 73.21(c)(2). This information must be handled and protected in
accordance with the provisions of 10 CFR 73.21.
Consequently, the enclosure
to this letter, our report of the inspection, and your response to tha
violations identified in the enclosure to this letter will not be placed in
regarding the violations identified in the enclosure should be submitted as
the NRC Public Document Room. Therefore, your statement of corrective action
t
a separate enclosure to your transmittal letter in the manner prescribed.
i
Enclosuro Contains
nsefratt
ON
O
9607020147 e60623
h-
Page IS Decontro
'
ADOCK 0000
1
e
-
,
'.
'
,
hhk
'
The Detroit Edison Company
2
JUN 2 31986
The responses directed by this letter and the accompanying Notice
are not subject to the clearance procedures of the Office of Management
and Budget as recuired by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, PL 96-511.
We will gladly discuss any questions you have concerning this inspection.
Sincerely,
.
. A. Hind, Director
Division of Radiation Safety
and Safeguards
Enclosure:
Inspection Report
No. 50-341/86014(DRSS)
(UNCLASSIFIED SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION)
cc w/ enclosure:
L. P. Bregni, Licensing
Engineer
P. A. Marquardt, Corporate
Legal Department
IE File
IE/DI/0RPB
IE/ES
NMSS/SGPL
NRR/DL/SSPB
Resident Inspector, RIII
cc w/o enclosure, (UNCLASSIFIED
SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION):
DCS/RSB (RIDS)
Licensing Fee Management Branch
Ronald Callen, Michigan
Public Service Commission
Harry H. Voigt, Esq.
Nuclear Facilities and
Environmental Monitoring
Section
Monroe County Office of
Civil Preparedness
Enclosure Contains
RIII
R
RI I
RIII
RIII
SAFEGUAFCS INFORMATION
%~
Upon separation This
"' *"g'
"0%
4"$%
i"e ' ~ '
c~ "" "
^
"
.
WMtM4MM