ML20206J520

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Informs That 881108 Request for Extension of Public Comment Period on Proposed Fitness for Duty Rule Denied.Ample Response Time Provided
ML20206J520
Person / Time
Site: San Onofre  
Issue date: 11/16/1988
From: Grimes B
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To: Cintron J
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO.
References
FRN-53FR36795, RULE-PR-26 NUDOCS 8811290018
Download: ML20206J520 (1)


Text

. _ _

o r

NOV l e 1993 Juan A. Cintron, Jr.

Nuclear Instrument Technician San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station P. O. Box 128. B-67 San Clemente, California 92677 i

Dear Mr. Cintron:

This is in response to your request of November 8,1988, for the Comission to extend the public coment period on the proposed fitness.for. duty rule, As further discussed below, the Comitsion has provided ample opportunity for public awareness of and participation in this rulemaking process. Accordingly, your request must be denied.

Coments on the proposed rule should be submitted by November 21, 1988, t

kevertheless, coments received after that date will also be considered if it is practical to do so. However, we cannot assure full consideration except as to connents received by November 21, 1988.

1 1

Tne Comission indicated it was considering this rulemaking ind discussed the 92neral cor tents of the proposed rule during a public meeting)on Decen.ber 1,1987. The contents of the proposed rule (SECY 88-129 were dis.

i cussed in detail during a public meeting on June 21, 1988. The Comission j

held still another public meeting in Rockville, Maryland on October 17, 1988, to further public understanding of the issues and to facilitate the public l

coment process.

)

We appreciate your interest in this rulemaking and will give your written

[

j comments careful consideration when they are received. We will inform you if there is any change in comment period associated with this rulemaking.

Sincerely, I

l Original siped W Brian K. Grimes s

l Brian K. Grimes, Director t

)

Division of Reactor Inspection and Safeguards Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation gI

()/1

(

(.

(

l DISTRIBUTION d l[03 j

Ml

.PDR LLBush 4 teatM17tlesP RFonner e

y

[d 1

0' 8

DRIS R/F ABatts l

/

RSGB R/F FMiraglia g/ g f'fj)

BKGrimes DCrutchfield r

RAErickson WKennedy

  • SEE PREVIOUS CCNCURRENCE
5E
0:DRIS:

g..:. Q.

0FC

R5GB:

5:NRR

R5GB: R S:NRR :0GC NAME :LLBu ekm*
RAEr on
R er iB es
DKGrime DATE
11/16/88
ll/l 88
11/I6/88
11// 6/E _
11/1,/88 l

rr I

g12go18001116 f

26 53FR36795 PDR l

k

a

/A st-Ad-A %ar DOCKET NUMBER an PROPOSED Hut.

DL_J_fa NOVEMBE18,1988 SECRETARY OF THE COMMISS10N p

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISS10N W ASHINGTON D.C. 20555 fo'ckin.

' ir E... :,..

ATTN. DOCKETING AND SERVICES BRANCH DEAR SIRS, I RESPECTFULLY REQUEST AN EXTENTION OF 90 ADDITIONAL DAYS TO SUBMIT PUBLIC COMMENT WITH REGARD TO THE NOTICE PUBLISHED IN THE "EDERAL REGISTER ON SEPTEMBER 22,1988, VOL. 53 NUMBER 184 DEALING WITH THE RAND 0M DRUG TEST ISSUE FOR NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS.

I FEEL THAT THE PERIOD THAT THE COMMISSION t'

  • PROViDED IS INADEQUATE. I HAVE JUST RECENTLY RECElVED THE ABOVE REFZRENCED DOCUMENT AND FEEL COMPELLED TO EXAMINE AND C0!! MENT ON THIS ISSUE. THIS TESTING WILL DIRWTI.Y EFFECT ME AS A NUCLEAR POTER PLANT WORKER.

Southern California Edisc'1 Company Ic.sN[25,Yn#cN.c sY72 t...........,:

SWC EY i

y

\\

L s

J AN A. CINTRON JIt CLEAR INSTR ENT TECIINICIAN ONOFRE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION - P.O. BOI 128, B47

.- Q Q -/}-f } g N f

SAN CLEMENTE, CA. 92677