ML20206F754

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Physical Security Insp Repts 50-010/87-03, 50-237/87-12 & 50-249/87-12 on 870326-31.Violations Noted. Actions to Review Potential Problems Re Protected Area Barrier Ineffective
ML20206F754
Person / Time
Site: Dresden  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 04/09/1987
From: Hind J
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To: Reed C
COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO.
Shared Package
ML20206F758 List:
References
NUDOCS 8704140354
Download: ML20206F754 (2)


See also: IR 05000010/1987003

Text

- ~

k%g

APR 0 91987 i

I

l

Docket No. 50-10 i

Docket No. 50-237 l

Docket No. 50-249

Commonwealth Edison Company

ATTN: Mr. Cordell Reed

Vice President

Post Office Box 767

Chicago, IL 60690

Gentlemen:

This refers to the special physical security inspection conducted by

Mr. T. J. Madeda of this office on March 26-31, 1987, of activities at the

Dresden Nuclear Power Station, Units 1, 2, and 3, authorized by NRC Operating

Licenses No. DPR-02, 19, and 25 and to the discussion of our findings with

Mr. E. Eenigenburg and members of his staff at the conclusion of the onsite

inspection on March 26, 1987.

The enclosed copy of our inspection report identifies areas examined during

the inspection. Within these areas, the inspection consisted of a selective

examination of procedures and representative records, observations, and

interviews with personnel.

During this inspection, certain of your activities appeared to be in violation

of NRC requirements. You will be notified by separate correspondence of our

decision regarding enforcement actions based on the findings of this inspe. tion.

No written response is required until you are notified of the proposed en orcement

action. However, it is of particular concern to us that the specific protected

area barrier problem described in this report was previously identified to you

as a potential concern in an IE Information Notice. Your action to review the

potential problems at Dresden was ineffective.

Areas examined during this inspection concern a subject matter which is exempt

from disclosure according to Part 73, Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations,

Section 73.21(c)(2). This information must be handled and protected in

accordance with the provisions of 10 CFR 73.21. Consequently, our report of

this inspection will not be placed in the NRC Public Document Room.

O

/

't

8704140354 870409

PDR ADOCK 05000010

0 PDR Enclosure Contains

SAFEC'/.nm INFORMATION

Upon Separat.ica This

Pago is Decontrolled

W N FutVA.UY

, w

.u un wu . \l, .t'n

O A C 'A' 8 8 mn I )s..,r

U A- n y

w u . v ..UIt

Commonwealth Edison Company 2 APR 0 91987

We will gladly discuss any questions you have concerning this inspection.

Sincerely,

h/a/ M/ '

Jack A. Hind, Director

4 Division of Radiation Safety

and Safeguards

Enclosure: Inspection Reports

No. 50-10/87003(DRSS);

No. 50-237/87012(DRSS);

No. 50-249/87012(DRSS)

(UNCLASSIFIED SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION)

cc w/ enclosure:

D. L. Farrar, Director

of Nuclear Licensing

J. Eenigenburg, Plant Manager

IE File

IE/DI/ORPB

IE/ES

NMSS/SGPL

NRR/PWR-B/SSPB

cc w/ enclosure, w/o

UNCLASSIFIED SAFEGUARDS

INFORMATION:

DCS/RSB (RIDS)

Licensing Fee Management Branch

Resident Inspector, RIII

Richard Hubbard

J. W. McCaffrey, Chief, Public

Utilities Division

Enclosure contains

SAFEGUAMS liiFORMATION

-

Upon separation This

Page is Decontrolled

p

RIII RIII RIII r RIII RIII

Maded 1r hid b Axb.i dn' Ste ekon ing hfk

/re y/r -//#r7

SAT 8tfARM-+9WAT 0 N