ML20206D969
| ML20206D969 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 05/23/1986 |
| From: | Singh R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE) |
| To: | Kane W, Paperiello C, Reyes L NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I), NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II), NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20205H052 | List: |
| References | |
| FOIA-86-891 NUDOCS 8704130472 | |
| Download: ML20206D969 (4) | |
Text
23[f6 4
g,,,,
/
'o,,
UNITED STATES IE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION o
,I WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 f
3F 2 3 35 NOTE T0:
W. Kane, RI L. Reyes, RII C. Paperiello, RIII R. Hall, RIV R. Pate, RV J. Crews, RV G. Holahan, NRR/0 RAS S. Newberry, NRR/0 RAS P. McLaughlin, NRR/DHFT F. Hebdon, AE0D R. Dennig, AE0D G. Burdick, RES C. Johnson, RES P. McKee, IE/DI W. Scott, IE/QAVT FROM:
kabi Singh
SUBJECT:
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS As we discussed at the meeting on May 21, 1986, I am telefaxing t'his list of performance indicator assignments for your comment by Wednesday May 28, 1986 (date extended one day because this memo is one day late).
The following indicators were selected for the trial program:
PI's Assigned to 1.
Scrams Dennig/McLaughlin I
(i) While Critical (ii) Less than 15% Power (iii) Greater than 15% Power (iv) With Complications (Determine whether 15% is the proper cutoff by examining the frequency vs power curve.)
2.
ESF Actuations, Scrams, and Dennig the intersection of the two sets (See how the data look.
It is expected that the only meaningful item is the intersection, i.e., we will not be counting ESF actuations for their own sake.)
\\
1 1
i 8704130472 870407 6-891 PDR EN
~
Multiple addressees -
~
1 2.
- Safety System Actuations Dennig/Newberry from 50.72/50.73 (Essentially ESF Actuations Excluding Less Significant Systems) 3.
- Transients from 50.72/50.73 Dennig/Newberry/ Johnson 4.
Number of Unplanned Kane Shutdowns, Cause 5.
Forced Outage Rate Kane 6.
Number of LC0 Action Singn/Kane/Reyes Statements Entered, Why Entered (Train, System),
Time Spent in LCO l
J (Singh to Prepare TI for Residents to Gather Data) 7.
Fraction of Control Room Singh/Reyes Alarms that are Continuously Alarming (Off-Normal) Above 90%
Power (Singh to Prepare TI for Residents to Gather Data) 8.
Average Age of Outstanding Reyes d>
Audit Items j
9.
Maintenance Backlog Paperiello
-a 10.
Enforcement data, Weighted Hall by Severity, in month issued 11.
Cause of events in first Singh quarter calendar year 1986 (i) Personnel Error (ii) Design / Installation /
Fabrication (iii) Equipment failures (Singh to Prepare TI for Residents to Gather Data) 14.
Total Integrated Exposure McKee (man-rem / quarter-site)
^There is uncertainty about items 2 & 3.
Singh's notes indicate they are in the trial program. Allison's notes indicate they were dropped.
They appear to be needed to capture significant events and to relate somewhat to risk.
Comments are invited.
Multiple Addressees '
15.
Safety-System Failures Newberry/Dennig/ Johnson The following Performance Indicators were selected for further development and consideration of potential use.
1.
Percentage of Contractor Pate r)
Support 2.
Overall Maintenance Indicator McLaughlin 3.
Personnel Vacancies /0vertime Hall O
Turnover rate (There is uncertainty about this.
This write-up reflects Allison's notes but Singh's notes indicate we included this in the trial program as average number of years experience.
Comments are invited.)
c) 4.
Drawing Status /Configuation Scott /Reyes Management (There is uncertainty about this. This write-up reflects Allison's notes but Singh's notes indicate we included the item in the trial program as a check of control room drawing status.
Comments are invited.)
l 5.
Burdick and Johnson accepted the assignment to explore how we can use a sample PRA to better understand the indicators.
They also agreed to provide a list of plants with PRA's and this has already been done.
l 6.
Allison will draft a memo to answer Commissioner Zech's memo on manual scrams now, rather than waiting for the next commission paper to answer it.
The following items were dropped.
1.
Operator license exam results.
Leave to SALP.
?
2.
Allegations.
Leave to SALP.
3.
Significant events. Will be captured by other indications.
In addition, the following other actions were agreed upon.
1.
By Friday May 30, each person assigned a performance indicator for the trial program will send in for that indicator:
(a) the preferred source for gathering the data
Multiple Addressees
, (b) alternate sources for gathering the data j
(c) a recommended method of validation i
2.
Also by Friday May 30, each group (including PNL) will review the
)
entire list and sent in those items that it could do, e.g., DHFT could do scrams from the maintenance data base.
3.
We will then send out the final list.
4.
The next meeting will be on June 10 and 11. On the first day the primary subjects will be validation and implementing the trial program. On the second day we will meet with INPO and AIF.
5.
The following meeting will be July 8 and 9.
The primary subjects.
will be display of data and getting the next commission paper started.
W signed ey Rabi Singh cc: Bob Vallerio, PNL Jon Olson, PNL Distribution:
RVollmer SSchwartz EJordan p lison RSingh EAB:DEPER:IE EAB:DEPER RSingh:md DAllison 5/ /86 5/ /86
.