ML20205S873

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Rev 3 to Scrapped Matl as Re Matl Control
ML20205S873
Person / Time
Site: Sequoyah  Tennessee Valley Authority icon.png
Issue date: 03/27/1987
From: Russell Gibbs, Hutzler C, Owen D
TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY
To:
Shared Package
ML20205S746 List:
References
MC-40307-SQN, MC-40307-SQN-R03, MC-40307-SQN-R3, NUDOCS 8704070148
Download: ML20205S873 (9)


Text

f TVA EMPLOYEE CONCERNS REPORT NUMBER: MC-40307-SQN r SPECIAL PROGRAM REVISION NUMBER: 3 REPORT TYPE: Sequoyah Nuclear Plant Element (Final Report)

TITLE: Scrapped Material As Related to Material PAGE 1 0F 9 Control REASON FOR REVISION:

Revision 1: Revised to incorporate Senior Review Panel and Technical Assistance Staff's comments.

Revision 2: Revised to include corrective action and addition of Attachment A.

Revision 3: Revised to add concern IN-85-339-003.

PREPARATION PREPARED BY:

& B-2 S-8 7 rrn SIGNATURE DATE REVIEWS PEER:

N. N 4 3/2i/93 SIGNATURE DtIE

/

~

W $2Tb7

/ DATE

' SIGNATURE CONCURPly(I_

CEG-H: 0 f/t M96/87 DATE SRP: &R SIGNATURE * .

L /CI DATE SIGNATURE APPROVED BY:

A.3an & 3k,h1 klA l' DATE MANAGER OF NUCLEAR POWER DATE pCSPMANAGER CONCURRENCE (FINAL REPORT ONLY)

  • SRP secretary's signature denotes SRP concurrences are'in files.

8704070148 870331 DR ADOCK 05000327 PDR ,

TVA EMPLOYEE CONCERNS REPORI NUMBER: NC-40307-SQN SPECIAL PROGRAN REVISION NUMBER: 3 PAGE 2 0F 9 I. INTRODUCTION This report addresses the perceived problems stated in concerns ,

IN-85-291-001, IN-85-339-002, IN-85-339-003 IN-85-624-003, lR3 PH-85-003-009, WI-85-091-014 and SQP-5-004-003. It should be noted that SQP-5-004-003 was a site-specific concern for Sequoyah Nuclear Plant (SQN) and the other concerns this element report addresses were Watts Bar Nuclear Plant (WBN) concerns that were determined to be potentially generic to SQN during evaluation s't WBN.

II.

SUMMARY

OF PERCEIVED PROBLEN The perceived problem as stated in the concerns that this report addresses is that material that had been scrapped was retrieved from the scrap pile and used in permanent plant installations.

III. EVALUATION NETHODOLOGY

1. Reviewed expurgated files that were available for additional information.
2. Determined if adcitional investigations had been conducted regarding subject concerns.
3. Reviewed site procedures and upper-tier documents to determine the requirements for scrapped material and if scrapped material is adequately controlled.
4. Interviewed personnel that are now or have been associated with material installation to determine if material had been scrapped

~

and later retrieved for installation.

5. Determined by personal observation if adequate control is in place for scrapped material.
6. Reviewed Element Report NC-40307 to determina if the findings in this report for WBN were related to SQN.
7. Reviewed Nuclear Safety Review Staff (NSRS) Report I-86-164-SQN and related documents to determine if it adequately addresses the perceived problem of material being scrapped and later retrieved for installation.

l l

i l

  • l 1

f TVA EMPLOYEE CONCERNS REPORT NUMBER: MC-40307-SQN SPECIAL PROGRAM REVISION NUMBER: 3 PAGE 3 0F 9 IV.

SUMMARY

OF FINDINGS

1. Reviewed the expurgated files that were available at the time this report was written and found they did not provide any additional information.
2. The only investigations found to have been conducted for the subject concerns were NSRS Report I-86-164-SQN and WBH Employee Concerns Task Group (ECTG) Element Report 'MC-40307 which had been previously identified.
3. A review of site procedures and upper-tier requirements revealed that:-

A. During the construction phase of SQN there were no procedures in place controlling scrap material so as to prevent material that had been scrapped and its traceability maintained to be used in permanent plant installations.

B. There are currently procedures in place that address scrap material. However, one of these procedures (SQA-148) states, "It is common place practice to retrieve from scrap metal piles materials which may be needed for use in plant maintenance work." Also, it was apparent by the review of procedures conducted that scrap material was not adequately addressed.

This could result in material being scrapped and reused before going to the Power Stores scrapyard. This is based on the facts that the work control procedures do not adequately address scrap and identifying marks which would allow records to be retrieved that establishes traceability of the material, but not indicate the material had been scrapped (out of its required storage). l C. 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion XIII, requires measures to be established to control the storage of material and equipment to prevent damage or deterioration.

4. It was found by the interviews conducted that:

A. During the construction phase of SQN, material was on occasion scrapped by mistake, its traceability maintained, and therefore retrieved for installation at a later time. However, no specific items could be identified.

B. Currently, material leftover or retired from repair or maintenance operations is on occasion kept for possible future use on non-QA, non-CSSC work. This practice occurs because it

. is difficult to return these items to Power Stores.

l

~

7 l

l TVA EMPLOYEE CONCERNS REPORT NUMBER: MC-40307-SQN SPECIAL PROGRAN REVISION NUMBER: 3 PAGE 4 0F 9

5. It was determined by personal observation that material placed in the Power Stores scrapyard could not be retrieved for future use without making engineering aware of the need for the material. This is based on the fact it is placed in a fenced and locked area, and access is controlled by the Power Stores Supervisor. However, material leftover or retired from maintenance and modification operations in some cases is not returned to Power Stores for credit nor put in the Power Stores scrapyard. Some of this material is placed in scrap bins that are routinely taken to the Power Stores scrapyard, and some is placed in

- in-house storage areas for possible future use. These storage areas are not controlled, the material is not identified as being acceptable for non-QA use only, and the storage conditions for some of this QA material are questionable.

6. A review of Element Report MC-40307 revealed that site procedures did not address scrap material and access to scrap material was not controlled. This resulted in material being scrapped (not in its required storage environment) by mistake and then being retrieved and-installed.
7. It was determined by reviewing NSRS Report number I-86-164-SQN that this report adequately addressed the specific concern and there were no findings or recommendatior.s. However, the overall program for the control of scrap material is not addressed. The conclusion in the NSRS report is based on the assumption that traceability is is lost when material is scrapped and this is not always the case.

Conclusions:

During the evaluation, no items were identified as having beenNo scrapped and retrieved from the scrapyard for installation.

conditions that would affect the safe operation of the plant have been identified to date. Therefore, the perceived problem could not be validated. However, the program controlling scrap material needs to be strengthened. Currently corporate guidance does not exist addressing this.

V. ROOT CAUSE j

Not applicable No problem validated / substantiated

{.

l

f f

TVA EMPLOYEE CONCERNS REPORT NUMBER: MC-40307-SQN

-. SPECIAL PROGRAN REVISION NUMBER: 3 PAGE 5 OF 9 VI. CORRECTIVE ACTION As provided by line management:

Revise SQM1 and SQM2 to define the requirements and responsibilities to control use of scrap materials. Elements to be included in the proposed revision are:

1. Include requirements to review storage requirements of materials

' maintained in the section as spare parts and ensure storage requirements of AI-36 are complied with.

2. Include requirements to evaluate cannibalized, scrapped or left over material before use, to ensure that traceability has been maintained and the material has been properly stored to maintain its qualification.

The proposed Corrective Action Plan controls the use of material and not the control of storage areas for scrapped material or material kept for further cannibalzation. SQA-148 will be revised to remove the statement that use of scrap materials is a common maintenance practice. The steps proposed will provide positive control of scrap materials for all future applications. There are not cases identified where a misapplication of the materials existed; Therefore, this action is considered appropriate.

Reference:

CATD 40307-SQN-01 VII. GENERIC APPLICABILITY Based on the similarities of this problem / condition at WBN and SQN and the fact that some of the personnel involved are now or have been at Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant-(BFN) and Bellefonte Nuclear Plant (BLN), this problem is potentially generic to BFN and BLN.

VIII. ATTACHMENTS f Attachment A: Listing of concerns indicating relationship to Nuclear Safety and Generic Applicability.

i i

I t

l RRPORT NUMBER: MC-40307-SQN' l TVA EMPLOYEE CONCERNS j SPECIAL PROGRAN  !

REVISION NUMBER: 3 PAGE 6 0F 9 TVA Employee Concerns Special Program Attachment A GENERIC APPL QCT/NSRS P#

INVESTIGATION S CONCERN DESCRIPTION CONCERN SUB PLT B B S W R

CAT LOC FLQB CAT REPORT NUMBER SR Material has been IR3 IN-85-624-003 MC 403 WBN -Y Y Y N taken from the Report T50060 scrap yard back to the plant (Names known to QTC).

403 WBN YYYN SR Valves that had IR3 PH-85-003-009 MC been scrapped Report T50106 were used for installation in 1980. CI has no r more information no follow up required.

I-86-164-SQN- SR Sequoyah: New lR3 SQP-85-004-003 MC 403 SQN YYNY material has T50229 K-Form been ordered scrapped by a supervisor and later retrieved by a different group. 'This could represent a lack of control regarding scrapped material.

Names / details known to QTC and withheld to maintain confidentiality.

No further information.may be released.

Nuclear power concern. CI has no further information.

No-follow up required.

,m.,_ ._.- ._.. ., ,, . . _ , . , , , , . ,,,y, - . . . , . , , .- - . - - - . . - . , . _ _ m ._._-,,__my. . . , ..- y .

F TVA EMPLOYEE CONCERNS REPORT NUMBER: MC-40307-SQN SPECIAL PROGRAM REVISION NUMBER: 3 PAGE 7 0F 9 I-85-713-WBN SR TVA has very IR3 WI-85-091-014 MC 403 WBN YYYN poor control MC 404 Report T50197 over snubbers MP 711 in the manner in which they are stored and handled. These expensive snubbers are frequently scrapped and later retrieved from the scrap yard for installation.

CI has no further information.

Construction department concern.

SR Valves, pipe. lR3 IN-85-291-001 MC 403 WBN YYYN hanger material, Report T50041 etc. are retrieved from scrap pile for use in plant (Good material that had been thrown away per employee). No documentation required.

Material may have been there for quite some time out of the controlled storage i level.

I i

7 TVA EMPLOYEE CONCERNS -REPORT NUMBER: MC-40307-SQN SPECIAL PROGRAM REVISION NUMBER: 3 PAGE 8 0F 9 This report SR A foreman, l IN-85-339-003 MC 403 WBN YYYY employed at l 113 WBN addresses only T50039 CO WBNP for 4 years l 604 WBN the portion of IH (name known) was !

the concern that is underlined. alleged to have i routinely l ordered craft i personnel under i his supervision l to violate pro- IR3 cedure require- 1 ments, and to l bypass inspec- l tion hold points I relative to I anchor pull I tests. Foreman I also had a habit I of routinely I utilizing scrap l metal in safety- 1 related work I (units 1 & 2) I and of extreme I harassment of I craft who l Juestioned his I orders to i violate bypass I procedure 1 requirements. 1 Timeframe was 1 1978-1982. l 9

YVA EMPLOYEE CONCERNS REPORT NUMBER: MC-40307-SQN

' SPECIAL PROGRAM REVISION NUMBER: 3 b

PAGE 9 0F 9 403 WBN YYYN SR Foreman (Name IR3 IN-85-339-002 MC known) admitted T50039 Report to the individual that a hanger baseplate had been procured, at his order, from the steamfitter scrap-yard and installed when the concerned individual was not at work. Location was given as unit

  1. 2, elevation 786',

rod control room, on the ceiling.

Time frame was first 6 months of 1981.

  1. PSR Codes: lR3 SR - Nuclear Safety Related SS - Nuclear Safety Significant NO - Not Nuclear Safety Related.

l 1 l f

l l

t

(- - . . - _ . - _ _ - . _ ___ ___, _ _ _ _ , _ _ _

_