Proposed Tech Specs Revising SR 3.3.5.2 & Associated Bases to Allow Loss of Voltage & Degraded Voltage Trip Setpoints to Be Treated as Nominal Values in Same Manner as Trip Setpoints for RTS & ESFAS InstrumentationML20205S379 |
Person / Time |
---|
Site: |
Vogtle ![Southern Nuclear icon.png](/w/images/1/14/Southern_Nuclear_icon.png) |
---|
Issue date: |
04/19/1999 |
---|
From: |
SOUTHERN NUCLEAR OPERATING CO. |
---|
To: |
|
---|
Shared Package |
---|
ML20205S375 |
List: |
---|
References |
---|
NUDOCS 9904260201 |
Download: ML20205S379 (10) |
|
|
---|
Category:TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS
MONTHYEARML20217G6571999-10-13013 October 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Pages,Revising TS to Permit Relaxation of Allowed Bypass Test Times & Completion Times for LCOs 3.3.1 & 3.3.2 ML20217B1221999-10-0404 October 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Pages,Revising TS 5.5.6 Incorporating Exceptions to Reg Guide 1.35,rev 2,as Described in FSAR Section 3.8.1.7.2 Re Prestressed Concrete Containment Tendon Surveillance Program ML20212F4891999-09-22022 September 1999 Proposed Rev to TS SR 3.8.1.13,to Include Upper Limit for DG Loading for 2 H Portion of SR ML20211J5511999-08-30030 August 1999 Proposed Tech Specs,Raising Level of Approval Authority for Deviations from Guidelines Provided to Minimize Unit Staff Overtime Specified in TS 5.2.2 ML20211J7281999-08-26026 August 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Updating Versions of LCO 3.0.4 & SR 3.0.4 to Be in IAW with Versions of LCO 3.0.4 & SR 3.0.4 as Noted in Rev 1 to NUREG-1431 ML20211E9111999-08-24024 August 1999 Proposed Tech Specs,Relaxing Slave Relay Test Frequency from Quarterly to Refueling Frequency ML20196L3181999-05-18018 May 1999 Proposed Tech Specs SRs 3.8.1.3 & 3.8.1.13 Reducing Loading Requirements for DGs ML20205S3791999-04-19019 April 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Revising SR 3.3.5.2 & Associated Bases to Allow Loss of Voltage & Degraded Voltage Trip Setpoints to Be Treated as Nominal Values in Same Manner as Trip Setpoints for RTS & ESFAS Instrumentation ML20205Q7901999-04-13013 April 1999 Proposed Tech Specs,Updating Versions of LCO 3.0.4 & SR 3.0.4 to Be Consistent with Versions of LCO 3.0.4 & SR 3.0.4 as Appear in Rev 1 to NUREG-1431 ML20154M9961998-10-15015 October 1998 Proposed Tech Specs,Deleting & Modifing Conditions Which Were Issued with Licenses That Are Now Obsolete ML20151U2011998-09-0303 September 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Pages for Amends to Licenses NPF-68 & NPF-81,changing TS to Support Replacement of Nuclear Instrumentation Sys Source Range & Intermediate Range Channels & post-accident Neutron Flux Monitoring Sys ML20236R4661998-07-13013 July 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Eliminating Periodic Response Time Testing Requirements on Selected Sensors & Selected Protected Channels ML20154Q8611998-06-30030 June 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Bases Since Implementation of Improved TS on 970123 Through Aug 1998 ML20206N3131998-06-30030 June 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Re Replacement of Nuclear Instrumentation Sys Source & Intermediate Range Channels & post-accident Neutron Flux Monitoring Sys ML20236F1631998-06-26026 June 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Revising LCO 3.3.6 Re CVI Instrumentation & LCO 3.9.4 Re Containment Penetrations to Facilitate Outage Planning ML20247K5041998-05-15015 May 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Pages Revising New Program 5.5.18 to Extent That Items B,C & D. Refer to LCO Action Statement & Bases Insert for New Required Actions B.5.1 & B.5.2 ML20247G9471998-05-0808 May 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Section 5.5.7, RCP Flywheel Insp Program, Specifying Alternate Flywheel Insp Once Every Ten Years ML20216J4971998-04-16016 April 1998 Proposed Tech Specs 3.3.1 & 3.3.2 Re Reactor Trip Sys & ESFAS Instrumentation ML20199E5351998-01-27027 January 1998 Complete Replacement of All Typed Pages of TS Changes Submitted in Ltr LCV-0849-E ML20199A4131998-01-22022 January 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Adding Conditions for DG for Extended DG Completion Time of Fourteen Days ML20199J6651997-11-20020 November 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Pages Changing Capacity of Unit 1 Spent Fuel Storage Pool from 288 to 1476 Assemblies & Revising Design Features Description to Reflect Criticality Analyses & Storage Cell Spacing ML20199G3901997-11-20020 November 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Facilitating Treatment of Trip Setpoints as Nominal Values & Correct Certain Typos ML20211N2451997-10-10010 October 1997 Proposed Typed Tech Specs Pages,Revising Credit for Boron & Enrichment Increase for Fuel Storage ML20217H9051997-08-0808 August 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Pages Re Credit for Boron & Enrichment Increase for Fuel storage.W/marked-up Pages ML20141A8541997-06-13013 June 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Revising LCO 3.4.10 to Reduce Nominal Set Pressure by 1% to 2460 & Increase Tolerance to +2% ML20133L3081997-01-10010 January 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Table 3.3.1-1 Re Amends 96 & 74 ML20132C4711996-12-12012 December 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Re Physical Security & Contingency Plan ML20117N5851996-09-13013 September 1996 Proposed Tech Specs 3.8.1 Re AC Electrical Sources ML20129A6461996-09-11011 September 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Providing Updated Documentation for License Amends Application for Southern Nuclear to Become Licensed Operator ML20117C4151996-08-23023 August 1996 Proposed Tech Specs to Convert Units 1 & 2 Based on NUREG 1431 ML20117N6471996-06-17017 June 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Section 5.3.1,allowing Use of Fuel Assemblies Containing Fuel Rods Clad W/Zirlo ML20117N6361996-06-17017 June 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Clarifying Requirements of TS SR 4.8.1.1.2.j (2) That Prescribes Pressure Test of Portions of Diesel fuel-oil Sys Designed to Section Iii,Subsection Nd of ASME Code ML20111A5501996-05-0606 May 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Incorporating Extended DG AOT to 14 Days from Discovery of Failure to Meet Lco,Provided Standby Auxiliary Transformer Available ML20101D4151996-03-0505 March 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Re Conversion Based on NUREG-1431 ML20100G0371996-02-19019 February 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Based on NUREG-1431 ML20097A3171996-01-30030 January 1996 Proposed Improved TS Based on NUREG-1431 ML20095J2501995-12-22022 December 1995 Proposed Tech Specs,Allowing Use of Option B of 10CFR50,App J for Type B & C Testing ML20094N4071995-11-20020 November 1995 Proposed Tech Specs,Converting Existing TS to Format & Content of NUREG-1431 ML20093K2281995-10-16016 October 1995 Proposed Tech Specs,Adding Footnote to Spec 4.6.1.2.d Stating That Type B & C Tests Scheduled for Refueling Outage 1R6 Will Be Conducted Per Option B of 10CFR50 App J & Using Guidance of RG 1.163,Rev 0 ML20098C1471995-10-0202 October 1995 Proposed Tech Specs,Allowing Next Type a Test to Be Rescheduled ML20098A4861995-09-22022 September 1995 Proposed Tech Specs,Converting Existing VEGP TS Requirements to Format & Content of NUREG-1431 ML20086G5691995-07-0606 July 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Section 3.8.3.1,Page 3/4 8-15 Re Footnote & Bases & Expansion ML20085G7171995-06-14014 June 1995 Proposed Tech Specs,Clarifying in Revised Bases of 3/4 Chapter 8,that Alignment of Standby Auxiliary Transformer Intended to Be Temporary Alignment & Will Be Utilized When Normal Preferred Offsite Power Source,Rat Unavailable ML20083M0731995-05-12012 May 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Revising SR 4.1.6.2 to Support Exemption from 10CFR50,App J Type a Test Schedule ML20083A1391995-05-0202 May 1995 Proposed Tech Specs,Adding Automatic Load Sequencer to Plant TS ML20082D9881995-04-0404 April 1995 Proposed Tech Spec Page 6-7 Reflecting Corrected Terminology Re Composition of Plant Review Board ML20081J5031995-03-17017 March 1995 Proposed TS 3.9.4 Re Containment Airlock Doors to Be Open During Fuel Movement ML20081D1591995-03-17017 March 1995 Proposed TS Table 3.3-8, Accident Monitoring Instrumentation, Deleting Loop Numbers 551,552,553 & 554 ML20082E7731995-03-0404 March 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Re Plant Review Board Composition ML20080N2451995-02-28028 February 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Pages Re Accident Montoring Instrumentation 1999-09-22
[Table view] Category:TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS & TEST REPORTS
MONTHYEARML20217G6571999-10-13013 October 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Pages,Revising TS to Permit Relaxation of Allowed Bypass Test Times & Completion Times for LCOs 3.3.1 & 3.3.2 ML20217B1221999-10-0404 October 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Pages,Revising TS 5.5.6 Incorporating Exceptions to Reg Guide 1.35,rev 2,as Described in FSAR Section 3.8.1.7.2 Re Prestressed Concrete Containment Tendon Surveillance Program ML20212F4891999-09-22022 September 1999 Proposed Rev to TS SR 3.8.1.13,to Include Upper Limit for DG Loading for 2 H Portion of SR ML20211J5511999-08-30030 August 1999 Proposed Tech Specs,Raising Level of Approval Authority for Deviations from Guidelines Provided to Minimize Unit Staff Overtime Specified in TS 5.2.2 ML20211J7281999-08-26026 August 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Updating Versions of LCO 3.0.4 & SR 3.0.4 to Be in IAW with Versions of LCO 3.0.4 & SR 3.0.4 as Noted in Rev 1 to NUREG-1431 ML20211E9111999-08-24024 August 1999 Proposed Tech Specs,Relaxing Slave Relay Test Frequency from Quarterly to Refueling Frequency ML20196L3181999-05-18018 May 1999 Proposed Tech Specs SRs 3.8.1.3 & 3.8.1.13 Reducing Loading Requirements for DGs ML20205S3791999-04-19019 April 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Revising SR 3.3.5.2 & Associated Bases to Allow Loss of Voltage & Degraded Voltage Trip Setpoints to Be Treated as Nominal Values in Same Manner as Trip Setpoints for RTS & ESFAS Instrumentation ML20205Q7901999-04-13013 April 1999 Proposed Tech Specs,Updating Versions of LCO 3.0.4 & SR 3.0.4 to Be Consistent with Versions of LCO 3.0.4 & SR 3.0.4 as Appear in Rev 1 to NUREG-1431 ML20154M9961998-10-15015 October 1998 Proposed Tech Specs,Deleting & Modifing Conditions Which Were Issued with Licenses That Are Now Obsolete ML20151U2011998-09-0303 September 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Pages for Amends to Licenses NPF-68 & NPF-81,changing TS to Support Replacement of Nuclear Instrumentation Sys Source Range & Intermediate Range Channels & post-accident Neutron Flux Monitoring Sys ML20236R4661998-07-13013 July 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Eliminating Periodic Response Time Testing Requirements on Selected Sensors & Selected Protected Channels ML20154Q8611998-06-30030 June 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Bases Since Implementation of Improved TS on 970123 Through Aug 1998 ML20206N3131998-06-30030 June 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Re Replacement of Nuclear Instrumentation Sys Source & Intermediate Range Channels & post-accident Neutron Flux Monitoring Sys ML20236F1631998-06-26026 June 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Revising LCO 3.3.6 Re CVI Instrumentation & LCO 3.9.4 Re Containment Penetrations to Facilitate Outage Planning ML20248K5801998-05-25025 May 1998 Rev 1 to VEGP Units 1 & 2 Second 10-Yr Interval Valve IST Program ML20247K5041998-05-15015 May 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Pages Revising New Program 5.5.18 to Extent That Items B,C & D. Refer to LCO Action Statement & Bases Insert for New Required Actions B.5.1 & B.5.2 ML20247G9471998-05-0808 May 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Section 5.5.7, RCP Flywheel Insp Program, Specifying Alternate Flywheel Insp Once Every Ten Years ML20216J4971998-04-16016 April 1998 Proposed Tech Specs 3.3.1 & 3.3.2 Re Reactor Trip Sys & ESFAS Instrumentation ML20199E5351998-01-27027 January 1998 Complete Replacement of All Typed Pages of TS Changes Submitted in Ltr LCV-0849-E ML20199A4131998-01-22022 January 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Adding Conditions for DG for Extended DG Completion Time of Fourteen Days ML20198P6961998-01-16016 January 1998 Revised Spent Fuel Pool Boron Dilution Analysis ML20216B2621997-12-11011 December 1997 Rev 14 to ODCM, for Vogtle Electric Generating Plant ML20199G3901997-11-20020 November 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Facilitating Treatment of Trip Setpoints as Nominal Values & Correct Certain Typos ML20199J6651997-11-20020 November 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Pages Changing Capacity of Unit 1 Spent Fuel Storage Pool from 288 to 1476 Assemblies & Revising Design Features Description to Reflect Criticality Analyses & Storage Cell Spacing ML20211N2451997-10-10010 October 1997 Proposed Typed Tech Specs Pages,Revising Credit for Boron & Enrichment Increase for Fuel Storage ML20217H9051997-08-0808 August 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Pages Re Credit for Boron & Enrichment Increase for Fuel storage.W/marked-up Pages ML20141A8541997-06-13013 June 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Revising LCO 3.4.10 to Reduce Nominal Set Pressure by 1% to 2460 & Increase Tolerance to +2% ML20148E6481997-05-15015 May 1997 Rev 0 to VEGP Units 1 & 2 Second 10-Yr Interval Pump IST Program ML20148E6611997-05-15015 May 1997 Rev 0 to VEGP Units 1 & 2 Second 10-Yr Interval Valve IST Program ML20133L3081997-01-10010 January 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Table 3.3.1-1 Re Amends 96 & 74 ML20140J4591996-12-13013 December 1996 Rev 11 to ODCM for Vogtle Electric Generating Plant, ML20138F1001996-12-13013 December 1996 Revs 10 & 11 to ODCM, Part 2 ML20132C4711996-12-12012 December 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Re Physical Security & Contingency Plan ML20134J9841996-10-0808 October 1996 /Unit 2 Fuel Assembly Insp Program ML20117N5851996-09-13013 September 1996 Proposed Tech Specs 3.8.1 Re AC Electrical Sources ML20129A6461996-09-11011 September 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Providing Updated Documentation for License Amends Application for Southern Nuclear to Become Licensed Operator ML20117C4151996-08-23023 August 1996 Proposed Tech Specs to Convert Units 1 & 2 Based on NUREG 1431 ML20117N6361996-06-17017 June 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Clarifying Requirements of TS SR 4.8.1.1.2.j (2) That Prescribes Pressure Test of Portions of Diesel fuel-oil Sys Designed to Section Iii,Subsection Nd of ASME Code ML20117N6471996-06-17017 June 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Section 5.3.1,allowing Use of Fuel Assemblies Containing Fuel Rods Clad W/Zirlo ML20111A5501996-05-0606 May 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Incorporating Extended DG AOT to 14 Days from Discovery of Failure to Meet Lco,Provided Standby Auxiliary Transformer Available ML20106H2391996-03-31031 March 1996 Rev 10 to Gap Security Dept Vogtle Electric Generating Plant Nuclear Security Training & Qualification Plan ML20101D4151996-03-0505 March 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Re Conversion Based on NUREG-1431 ML20100G0371996-02-19019 February 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Based on NUREG-1431 ML20097A3171996-01-30030 January 1996 Proposed Improved TS Based on NUREG-1431 ML20096G8241996-01-22022 January 1996 Inservice Insp Program, for VEGP-2 ML20095J2501995-12-22022 December 1995 Proposed Tech Specs,Allowing Use of Option B of 10CFR50,App J for Type B & C Testing ML20094N4071995-11-20020 November 1995 Proposed Tech Specs,Converting Existing TS to Format & Content of NUREG-1431 ML20093K2281995-10-16016 October 1995 Proposed Tech Specs,Adding Footnote to Spec 4.6.1.2.d Stating That Type B & C Tests Scheduled for Refueling Outage 1R6 Will Be Conducted Per Option B of 10CFR50 App J & Using Guidance of RG 1.163,Rev 0 ML20098C1471995-10-0202 October 1995 Proposed Tech Specs,Allowing Next Type a Test to Be Rescheduled 1999-09-22
[Table view] |
Text
l
. . i
, . Enclosure 3 l
l Vogtle Electric Generating Plant l Request to Revise Technical Specifications
, , Loss of Power Instrumentation Trip Setpoints -
Marked-Up TS and Bases Pages i
l i
i i
i 9904260201 990419 PDR ADOCK 05000424 P PDR _
s- E3-1 l
l
LOP Instrum:ntation )
3.3.5
. ACTIONS (continued)
CONDITION REQUIRED ACTION COMPLETION TIME I
D. Required Actions and D.1 Be in MODE 3. 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br /> associated Completion Times not met in MODES AND 1, 2, 3, or 4.
D.2 Be in MODE 5. 36 hours4.166667e-4 days <br />0.01 hours <br />5.952381e-5 weeks <br />1.3698e-5 months <br /> E. Required Action and E.1 Enter applicable immediately associated Completion Condition (s) and Time not met when the Required Action (s)for the associated DG is associated DG made required OPERABLE by inoperable by LOP DG LCO 3.8.2. start instrumentation.
SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY SR 3.3.5.1 Perform COT. 92 days (N5GRT NOTE- e N o m sn a,l SR 3.3.5.2 Perform CHANNEL CALIBRATION with\ Trip Setpoint 18 months and Allowable Value as follows:
A. Loss of voltage Allowable Value 2 2912 V with a time delay of s 0.8 second.
NomiAAl Loss of voltagkTrip Setpoin 2 975 V with a time delay of s 0.8 second.
B. Degraded voltage Allowable Value 2 3683 V with a time delay of s 20 seconds.
$ 8WIA8l /
Degraded voltagebTrip SetpointG3746 V with a time delay of 5 20 seconds.
(continued)
Vogtle Units 1 and 2 3.3.5-2 Amendment No. 96 (Unit 1)
Amendment No. 74 (Unit 2)
INSERT FOR NOTE TO SR 3.3.S.2 NOTE-A channel is OPERABLE with an actual Trip Setpoint value outside its calibration tolerance band, provided the Trip Seipoint value is conservative with respect to its associated Allowable Value and the channel is readjusted to within the established calibration tolerance band of the Nominal Trip Setpoint. A Trip Setpoint may be set more conservative than the Nominal Trip Setpoint as necessary in response to plant conditions.
l
LOP DG Start Instrumentation B 3.3.5
. BASES BACKGROUND Trip Setpoints and Allowable Values (continued)
The Trip Setpoints used in the bistables are based on the analytical r 7 _ limits presented in FSAR, Chapter 15 (Ref. 2)4The selection of th
[ 7hg, g /g.//g/ I np detpoints is sJun inat auequate protecuon is provided when all sensor and processing time delays are taken into account.
lidh ha,e/ % \
u '
I he actual nominal Trip Setpoint entered into the relays is normally '
//f CO/*/ O/N7W s ' more conservative than that required by the Allowable Value.
the easured setpoint does not uceed the Allowable Value, t relay 0 8d 3. 38 7, is con ered OPERABLE.
8 / A/[4#d/h Setpoints a asted in accordance with the Allowable Va ensure that the corwe ences of accidents will be acceptabl , providing the
,/,/%J, FF unit is operated f within the LCOs at the onset the accident and that the equipment ctions as designed.
Allowable Values and/or 'p Setpoints ar pecified for each Function in the LCO. Nomi l Trip Set ints are also specified in the unit specific setpoint calculatio T nominal setpoints are selected to ensure that the setpoint meas d by the surveillance procedure does not exceed the Allowabl alu 'f the bistable is performing as required, if the measured s oint do not exceed the Allowsole Value, the relay is consi ed OPERABL Operation with a Trip Setpoint less conserv e than the nomina ' ip Setpoint, but within I the Allowable Valu is acceptable provided th operation and testing !
is consistent wit e assumptions of the unit spe ' c setpoint calculation. ch Allowable Value and/or Trip Setpo t specified is more cons ative than the analytical limit assumed in transient l and ace' nt analyses in order to account for instrument u riainties l appr iate to the trip function. These uncertainties are defin 'n the ;
"U Specific Setpoint Calculation."
APPLICABLE The LOP DG start instrumentation is required for the ESF SAFETY ANALYSES Systems to function in any accident with a loss of offsite power. Its design basis is that of the ESFAS. "
'l (continued)
Vogtle Units 1 and 2 B 3.3.5-2 Revision No. 0
LOP DG Start Instrumsntation B 3.3.5
)
BASES ;
ACTIONS Ej (continued) j required to be entered immediately. The actions of this LCO I provide for adequate compensatory actions to support unit safety.
SURVEILLANCE SR 3.3.5.1 l REQUIREMENTS SR 3.3.5.1 is the performance of a COT. This test is performed every 92 days. A COT is performed on each required channel to ensure the entire channel will perform the intended Function. Setpoints must be found within the specified Allowable Values. The Frequency is based on the known reliability of the equipment and controls and the j multichannel redundancy available, and has been shown to be acceptable through operating experience.
SR 3.3.5.2 SR 3.3.5.2 is the performance of a CHANNEL CAllBRATION. $ )
frJSift 7 The netpoints, as well as the response to a loss of voltage and a
\
d c. fed voltage test, shallinclude a b;ngle point verification that the tn,m . es within the required time delay.
A CHANNEL CAllBRATION is performed every 18 months, or approximately at every refueling. CHANNEL CAllBRATION is a
{
l complete check of the instrument loop, including the sensor. The test verifies that the channel responds to a measured parameter within the necessary range and accuracy.
The Frequency of 18 months is based on operating experience and j consistency with the typical industry refueling cycle and is justified by the assumption of an 18 month calibration intervalin the ]
determination of the magnitude of equipment drift in the setpoint analysis.
1 l
l (continued) l l
Vogtle Units 1 and 2 B 3.3.5-7 Revision No. O
INSERT FOR HASES FOR SR 3.3.5.2
. This SR is modified by a Note that clarifies the OPERABILITY requirements with respect to the Nominal Trip Setpoint. The Nominal Trip Setpoint considers factors that may affect channel performance such as rack drift, etc. Therefore, the Nominal Trip Setpoint (within the cdbration tolerance) is the expected value for the CHANNEL CAllBRATION.
However, the Aliowable Value is the value that was used for the loss of voltage and degraded grid ctudies. Therefore, a channel with an actual Trip Setpoint value that is conservative with respect to the Allowable Value is considered OPERABLE; but the channel should be reset to the Nominal Trip Setpoint value (within the calibration tolerance) to allow for factors which may affect channel performance (such as rack drift) prior to the next surveillance. A channel may be left with an actual Trip Setpoint value that is conservative to the Nominal Trip Setpoint at any time as necessary.
1
r-1 Enclosure 4 I
- 1 Vogtle Electric Generating Plant Request to Revise Technical Speci6 cations Loss of Power Instrnmentation Trip Setpoints Clean Typed TS and flases Pages I
I l
l l
l i
i E4-1
/
r 8
A LOP instrum:ntation 3.3.5 ACTIONS (continued)
CONDITION REQUIRED ACTION COMPLETION TIME D. Required Actions and D.1 Be in MODE 3. 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br /> associated Completion Times not met in MODES AND 1, 2, 3, or 4.
D.2 Be in MODE 5. 36 hours4.166667e-4 days <br />0.01 hours <br />5.952381e-5 weeks <br />1.3698e-5 months <br /> E. Required Action and E.1 Enter applicable immediately associated Completion Condition (s) and Time not met when the Required Action (s) for the associated DG is associated DG made required OPERABLE by inoperable by LOP DG LCO 3.8.2. start instrumentation.
SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY 4
SR 3.3.5.1 Perform COT. 92 days SR 3.3.5.2 -
-NOTE A channel is OPERABLE with an actual Trip Setpoint value outside its calibration tolerance band, :,rovided the Trip Setpoint vslue is conservative with respect to 1 its associated Allowable Value and the channel is 1 readjusted to within the established calibration talerance band of the Nominal Trip Setpoint. A Trip Setpoint may be set more conservative than the Nominal Trip Setpoint as necessary in response to plant conditions.
Perform CHANNEL CAllBRATION with Nominal Trip 18 months l Setpoint and Allowable Value as follows:
A. A. Loss of voltage Allowable Value 2 2912 V with a time delay of s 0.8 second.
l !
Loss of voltage Nominal Trip Setpoint 2975 V with a time delay of s 0.8 second.
(continued)
Vogtle Units 1 and 2 3.3.5-2 Amendment No. (Unit 1)
Amendment No. (Unit 2) c
LOP instrumsntation l 3.3.5 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS (continued)
SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY B. Degraded voltage Allowable Value 2 3683 V with a time delay of 5 20 seconds.
Degraded voltage Nominal Trip Setpoint l 3746 V with a time delay of s 20 seconds.
SR 3.3.5.3 NOTE-Not required to be performed for the turbine-driven Auxiliary Feedwater (AFW) pump until 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> after Steam Generator pressure is 2 900 psig.
Verify AFW system ESF RESPONSE TIME for loss 18 months on a of voltage and degraded voltage on the 4.16 kV ESF STAGGERED buses within limit. TEST BASIS
(
Vogtle Units 1 and 2 3.3.5-3 Amendment No. (Unit 1)
Amendment No. (Unit 2)
~
LOP DG Strrt Instrum:ntation '
B 3.3.5 BASES BACKGROUND Trio Setooints and Allowable Values (continued)
The Trip Setpoints used in the bistables are based on the analytical l limits presented in FSAR, Chapter 15 (Ref. 2). These analytical limits '
have been incorporated into SR 3.3.5.2 as the Allowable Values. The selection of these Trip Setpoints is such that adequate protection is provided when all sensor and processing time delays are tak h into I account.
I i
l APPLICABLE The LOP DG start instrumentation is required for the ESF SAFETY ANALYSES Systems to function in any accident with a loss of offsite power, its design basis is that of the ESFAS.
l I
(conti7ued)
Vogtle Units 1 and 2 8 3.3.5-2
LOP DG Start Instrumsntation B 3.3.5
-BASES ACTIONS E.1 (continued) required to be entered immediately. The actions of this LCO provide for adequate compensatory actions to support unit safety.
SURVEILLANCE SR 3.3.5.1 REQUIREMENTS SR 3.3.5.1 is the performance of a COT. This test is performed every 92 days. A COT is performed on each required channel to ensure the entire channel will perform the intended Function. Setpoints must be found within the specified Allowable Values. The Frequency is based on the known reliability of the equipment and controls and the multichannel redundancy aveilable, and has been shown to be acceptable through operating experience.
SR 3.3.5.2 SR 3.3.5.2 is the performance of a CHANNEL CAllBRATION. This
. SR is modified by a Note that clarifies the OPERABILITY ,
requirements with respect to the Nominal Trip Setpoint. The Nominal l Trip Setpoint considers factors that may affect channel performance i such as rack drift, etc. Therefore, the Nominal Trip Setpoint (within the calibration tolerance) is the expected value for the CHANNEL CALIBRATION. However, the Allowable Value is the value that was ;
used for the loss of voltage and degraded grid studies. Therefore, a ;
channel with an actual Trip Setpoint value that is conservative with !
respect to the Allowable Value is considered OPERABLE; but the l channel should be reset to the Nominal Trip Setpoint value (within the i calibration tolerance) to allow for factors which may affect channel performance (such as rack drift) prior to the next surveillance. A ;
channel may be left with an actual Trip Setpoint value that is !
conservative to the Nominal Trip Setpoint at any time as necessary.
The setpoints, as well as the response to a loss of voltage and a l degraded voltage test, shall include a single point verification that the trip occurs within the required time delay.
A CHANNEL CALIBRATION is performed every 18 months, or approximately at every refueling. CHANNEL CAllBRATION is a l complete check of the instrument loop, including the sensor. The test verifies that the channel responds to a measured parameter within the i necessary range and accuracy. i The Frequency of 18 months is based on operating experience and
, consistency with the typical industry refueling cycle and is justified by the assumption of an 18 month calibration interval in the determination of the magnitude of equipment drift in the setpoint analysis.
(continued)
Vogtle Units f and 2 B 3.3.5-7
_