ML20205Q785

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Rev 3 to Procedure CP-EP-16.3, Control of Reportable Deficiencies
ML20205Q785
Person / Time
Site: Comanche Peak, 05000000
Issue date: 06/15/1984
From: Randy Baker, Mcbay M
TEXAS UTILITIES ELECTRIC CO. (TU ELECTRIC)
To:
Shared Package
ML20204J134 List:
References
FOIA-85-59 CP-EP-16.3, NUDOCS 8606030303
Download: ML20205Q785 (2)
v • d • e


Text

_ _.

n-.---.,- -- - _ ~ .., _

.11 -
  • - ~

..'....-~ ,

TUGCO EiGINEERING DIVISION PROCEDUPS PIVISION ISSUE PAGE l} i  !

CCtmOLL..,o $ }d J . CP-EP-16.3 3 06-15-54 1 of 6 V

CotTPOL OF g24 FPEPARED BY ./ e REPORTABLE CEFICIENCIES APPFOVED BY .N .e[

A 1.0 PSFERD:CES 1-A 'IUGCO CA Plan 1-B Title 10 Code of Federal Regulations Part 50.55(e) 2.0 GDIEFAL 2.1 RIRPCSE Tb define the actions aM interfaces recuired to report acparent er potential deficiencies. These reasures are established to assure pcsitive control of de provisiens of Paference 1-A a .d 1-3.

2.2 SCCPE This procedure shall apply te all activities perfc: ed during, fer, or as a result of the design ard procure ent of CPSES.

The provisiens of this procedure shall not be applied to generic deficiencies not specific to CPSES.

2.3 RESPCtJSIBILITY All personnel involved in the design ard procurement of, CPSES are respcnsible for the itplerentatien of the measures described herein.

The Managers of de respective crganizatiens shall be respcnsible for the i. plerentaticn cf ils precedure accordi.~ gly.

2.4 CEFINITICt'S A. Significant "veficiencies - General Peference Attachment 1

3. Significant Construction reficiencies Referena Attachmen 2 C. Significant Engineering reficiencies Peference Attachment 3 3.0 PFCCEDL92 3.1 C 'IPOL CF PEPCPl' AND EV7d. CATION ACTIVITIES i

Upen the initial chservatico cf a deficiency potentially reporticle I per the cuidelines established per Reference 1-3, ee arplicable i manager (2;E, CPTE, or Project Scoport Services)shall be inic: ed l 1

60 3 860522 == , ,

GARDE 85-59 PDR

~

W

,e -

' 'ILUCO ENGINEERI!T3 DIVISICM PFOCEECRE REVISICN ISSUE PAGE

[

DATE CP-EP-16.3 3 06-15-54 2 of 6 through the organizatien structure. The nanager shall revies er direct the review of the deficienef within a time frame not to exceed twenty-four (24) hours past the initial obser/aticn. The results of the review shall be cbcurented pr Attachment 4.

'Ite ranager shall refer findings of the review to the Assistant Project General Manager who shall provide the prirary tac interface -

the 'IUGCO Site CA Superviser er designee - with all pertinen evidence of the deficiency. Findings shall also be. simultanecusly forsarded to representatives of the responsible corporate efficers.

iihere specific individuals are identified in this precedure, it shall be specifically noted apprcpriate levels of management shall te substituted cr delegated. In no event shall the reperting efcle te delayed due to the absence of designated personnel.

3.2 FCUDi-UP If applicable, corrective actions shall be as crecified in the cmements secticn of the review. As a minimen, the design prccess shall be evaluated and corrected if related to the cause er origination of the deficiency.

3.3 FETrirICd Pricr to plant cperatien, duplicate files cf these evaluations shall ,

te forwarded to the TCGD Ocerations Grcuo resronsible cr cocrcinat-ing similar evaluations during cperations'. l 3.4 TFAINIIG To ensure compliance with this precedure, all personnel at the apprcpriate supervisory level shall be indcctrinated in the provisiens established herein. Facords cf this indccerination shall  ;

te raintained by the respective organizaticn manager.

I

f g$$. .

nw;e

$5 'IUGCO C;GItEERItG DIVISICN PIOCEDURE REVISICN ISSUE PAGE 1 DATE l l

CP-E.3-16.3 3 06-15-64 3 of 6 i

ATTACIND,7 1 ,

SIGNIFICANT CEFICIENCIES - GDERAL (EXCERITD FIC4 REFERD;CE l-B)

If the permit is for c::nstruction of a nuclear ;cwer plant, the 1 older of the permit shall notify the Comission of each deficiency found in design and construction, which, were it to have remained uncorrected, could have affected adversely the safety of operatiers of the nuclear ;cwer plant at any time throughout the expected lifetime of the plant, and which represents:

(a) A significant breakdown in any porticn of the gaality assurance program conducted in. accordance with the requirements of Appendix B; or (b) A significant deficiency in final design as approved ard released for construction such that the desica cbes not c=nform to the criteria and bases stated in the safety analysis report er construe:ico permit; er (c) A dignificant deficiency in constructicn of cr significant dar. age *w a structure, system, ce corrgonent which will require extensive evaluation, extensive redesign, er extensive repair to :reet the criteria and bases stated in the safety analysis re;crt er construc-icn gerait or ~a otherwise establish the adequacy of the structure, system, er cer:p:nent to perform its intended safety functicn; or (d) A significant deviation frem performance specifications which will require extensive evaluatien, extensive redesign, cr extensive repair to establish the adequacy of a structure, system, cr c:mponent to neet the criteria and bases stated in the safety analysis report er constructica permit er to ctherwise establish the adequacy of the structure, system, or cc::penent to perform its intended safety ' function.

4 Q i O '2 Ne c.. e.( e c , /, .,"o. .

7.c . . .

p ...

.w , . , ,

C7 Ci. f ,t f. n.,a.i; y

,w . f.c,

.- x,d:

n -4.

. . ~

,cp ,

V R Tus ec 4m.:t

(

y

. a r N DGINEERING DIVISICN FCOCEDUPS REVISICN ISSUE P.wE DATE i CP-EP-16.3 3 06-15-84 4 of 6 ATTACEMENT 2 SIGNIFICANT CCSSTRUCTICN CEFICIDICIES Significant be reportable. construction deficiencies are "prcduct"' nonconformances which :nav

'Ihese include, but are ret limited to, the following: "

a.

Product failures substantially belcw specified acceptance criteria; b.

Apparent product deficiencies or da: rage to safety-related structures, systems er cognents for which there is no readily obvicus routine rewrk ce repair procedure available or specified; c.

Product deficiencies responsible CC persennel; discovered subsect.snt to u'l'naI accectance by d.

Construction resolution; deficiencies which clearly require engineering analysis for e.

Ccnstruction deficiencies which will require further testing er evaluation in order torecords.

including inadequate determine the significance of the nonconfermance, 4

0 i

i 1

a

'I i

i

,. -- .,,4 e.--.,--. , , ,p.,- -.-,-r.n- . , . -

- + . . ,

e . .

~

> PFLTEDURE REVISICt1 ISSUE PAGE

'R GCO CGINEERING DIVISICN

~

I CATE CP-EP-16.3 3 06-15-84 5 of 6 A'ITACE1CTP 3 SIGNIFICAh? EGINEERING CEFICIENCIES Significant engineering deficiencies are " design" cencerns wnich may 1. Trac-the integrity of engineering cbcuments previously -issue 3 in acmrdence wi".h design control measures. 'Ihese include, but are not li:nitad to the follcwing:

a. Errces discovered by the A/E(s) revealed through cubsequent analysis;
b. Vendor correspondence describire generic product deficiencies;
c. Vendor correspondence describir, 5xcakdowns in established esineering control programs; 4
d. Errors in safery class classification identified in reclassificaticn eval'uatiens; ,

Vender 10CFR Part 21 notices,  !

e.

I i

'i

.

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20205Q785&oldid=3018472"