ML20205P905
| ML20205P905 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Beaver Valley |
| Issue date: | 05/29/1987 |
| From: | Tam P Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Carey J DUQUESNE LIGHT CO. |
| References | |
| IEIN-86-098, IEIN-86-98, NUDOCS 8811090011 | |
| Download: ML20205P905 (15) | |
Text
F
@y B l May 29,1967 s
Docket 50-412 (3
[
Mr. J. J. Carey, Senior Vice President DISTRIPifTION R. Pedersen
)
Duquesne Light Company Locket File i.P. TamL' Nuclear Group NRC & Local PDRs OGC-Bethesda Post Office Box 4 PDI-4 Reading E. Jordan Shippingport, Pennsylvania 15077 S. Yarga J. Partlow B. Boger ACRS(10)
Dear Mr. Carey:
S. Norris
[ Gray File)
SUBJECT:
BEAVER VALLEY UNIT 2 - CONFORMANCE WITH FEMA GUIDANCE MEMORANDUM MS-1 Enclosed is a copy of IE Infomation Notice No. 86-98: Offsite Medical Services which was distributed on December 2,1986 to all nuclear reactor facilities holding an operating license or a construction permit. The infomation notice transmitted a Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)
Guidance Meinorandum (GM) MS-1, "Medical Services," that addresses implementation of the Comission policy on offsite medical services published on September 17, 1986 in the Federal R_ejister (51 FR 32904).
A critical deadline is approaching for plants that did not have a full power operating license on the effective date of the GM (November 13,1986). The implementation section of the GM states, "Plans for plants that do not have a full power operating license should reflect the provisions of this GM within 9 months of the effective date of the GM" (i.e., August 13,1987).
If there is a possibility that your plant is to receive a full power licensing decision
,m on or after August 13, 1987, it will be necessary for the offsite plans to I
reflect the provisions of guidance memorandum MS-1.
Therefore, it is
(
important that this infonnation be submitted to FEMA in a timely manner to support your full power license. The NRC would like to be aware of the status of the offsite medical services arrangements in order to determine any potential delays in FEMA findings. Within 15 days, please provide a brief report on the status of arrangements for medical services in the offsite plans for your plant vis a vis the guidance in MS-1.
In particular, please identify the schedule for submission of offsite medical services information to FEMA's regional office (s).
The reporting and/or recordkeeping requirements contained in this letter affect fewer than ten respondents; therefore OMB clearance is not required under P.L.96-511.
Sincerely,
/s/
Peter S. Tam, Project Maneger Project Directorate I-4 Division of Reactor Projects I/II
Enclosure:
IN No. 86-98 (m
ec w/ enclosure:
V)
See next page f0 Gat 10$0011 870529 cc:
Plant Service list
[
F 1\\
LAPDLs PDI-4 4
PDI-4 PD PTamisf[
JSt K SN8frTs Rrede en M2/P7 M 91R7 a mV 00' r t*A rc7
l Mr. J. J. Carey Duquesne Light Company Beaver Valley 2 Power Station
/n\\
V
':c :
M ald Charnoff, Esq.
Mr. R. E. Martin, Manager Je., E. Silberg, Esq.
Regulatory Affairs Shaw Pittman, Potts & Trowbridge Duquesne Light Company 2300 i Street, N.W.
Beaver Valley Two Project Washinpon,DC 20037 P. O. Box 328 Shippingport, Pennsylvania 15077 Mr. C. W. Ewing. Ouality Assurance Pennsylvania Office of Consurer Manager Advocate Quality Assurance Department ATTN: Michael Bardee Duquesne Light Company 1425 Strawberry Square P. O. Box 186 Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17120 Shippingport, Pennsylvania 15077 John D. Burrows, P.E.
Director, Pennsylvania Emergency Director of Utilities Management Agency State of Ohio Room B-151 Public Utilities Comission Transportation & Safety Building 180 East Broad Street Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17120 Columbus, Ohio 43266-0573 Mr. T. J. Lex Bureau of Radiation Protection Westinghouse Electric Corporation PA Department of Environmental Power Systems Resources O
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania P. O. Box 355 ATTN:
R. Janati 15230 P.O. Box 2063 Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17120 Mr. P. RaySircar 2
Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation BVPS-2 Records Management Supervisor P. O. Box 2325 Duquesne Light Company Boston, Massachusetts 02107 Post Office Box 4 Shippingport, Pennsylvanta 15077 Mr. J. Beall U. S. NRC John A. Lee, Esq.
P. O. 181 Duquesno Light Company Shippingport, Pennsylvania 15077 1 0xford Centre 301 Grant Street Regional Administrator, Region !
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15279 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission 631 Park Avenue King of Prussia, Pennsylvania 19406 A
- .,-Q m y /fi,-p f g
, tgi r,"- }y..,
g
.g
.,1 7q.
SSINS No.: 6835
{v\\
IN 86-98 UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMISSION OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT WASHINGTON, D.C.
20555.
December 2, 1986 IE INFOP.MATION NOTICE NO. 86-98: OFFSITE MEDICAL SERVICES Addressees:
All nuclear power reactor facilities holding an operating license or a con-struction permit.
4 i
Purpose:
This information notice is provided to bring to the attention of licensees a new Commission policy on offsite medical services around nuclear power plants and a Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) guidance memorandue addressing that policy.
cability to their facilities.It is suggested that recipients review the information for appli-He written response is required.
Description of Circumstances:
Attached is FEMA Guidance Memorandum MS-1, "Medical Services," that addresses implementation of the Commission policy on offsite medical services published on September 17, 1986 in the Federal Register (51 FR 32904).
This Guidance Memorandum was prepared in enordination with the NE staff.
As noted in the referenced policy statement, the Commission has determined that these modifi-cations fall under the backfit rule's exception as necessary to bring facili-ties into compilance with a rule of the Comission.
No written response is required by this information notice.
If you have any questions about this matter, please contact the Regional Administrator of the appropriat.e regional of fice or this office, f
hvJ Toward L.
-dan, Director Division Emergency Preparedness and Engineering Response Office of Inspection and Enforcement Attachments:
1.
FEMA Guidance Memorandum MS 1 2.
List of Recently Issued IE Information Notices OTechnicalContact:
Edward M. Podolak, IE (301)492-7290
-861T250006
m
~
-Attachment 1-4.
- 1N 86 "^
December 2.1986
-(J Page 1 of 12 s i Federal Ernergency Management Agency WasMngton, D.C. 20472 MDOAWI.M FOR: Regicrial Directors N gg%
Actirg Regional Directors ray.:
':Ioughlin
- uty Associate Director State aM local Programs aM S@ port StBJECT
Guidance MenoraMJm (GM) KS-1, Medical Services ne attached m MS-1, Medical Services,-is fbrvarded' fbr your use in prcniding gaidance to State and local officials in developing their radiological emergency response plans ard in evaluating the radical services capabilities of State ard local gwerroents.
Se origins of this m aM its develcScent aM apprcval have been screeat '
dif ferent frcn other m's.
Bis CM was develepx3 as a result of a series of legal decisions involvirg NRO which determined that the existing interpretation of the required pre-accident rnedical arrangenents for contaMnated injured iMividuals was not sofficient. 1tsse decisicris led NRC to issoe a policy statrent (Attactrent B) on Septenber 17, 1986, iMicatirg thst the NRO staf f (in ccusultaticn with FD%) wculd develop detailed gJidance on the necesSary pre = accident arrafgrents for radical services by tknerter 17, 1986.
Mi hwe w3rked closely with NRO in recent weeks in the preparation of this gJidance. lhfortmately, the sb3rt deadline did not permit our ussi procedare of cctainirg Begional ard other ccrrents before issairy this final gJidance.
If you have any q;estions abcut MS-1, you may contact James horas at 646-2808. A list of all current operative CH's (Attachment C) is alma prcnided for your information.
MTA3tMS:
A.
(M MS-1, Medical Services B.
D ertjency Plamirn - Medical Services, septrber 17,19 86, 51 FR 329 04 C.
List of Operative (M's v
IN 86 98 Decembe'r.2.'1
_.P, 1986~
.page 2 of a m
O c'
f'(d:p.
y Federal Emergency Management Agency Washington. D.C. 204 72 GUIDANCE MIMORANDUM MS-1 i
~
MIDICAL 5[RVICES Porpose This Guidance Memorandun (GW.) provides interpretation and clarification of requirements contained in the Nuclear Regulatory Comission rule,10 CFR 50.47 (b)(12) and the associated guidance in NURIG-0654/TIVA REP-1, Revision 1, re-lated to the provision of medical services for members of the general pub 1tc.
Bac'iground
.. w The background is contained in a policy statement from the Nuclear Regulatory Comission (NkC) titled "Emergency Planning - Medical Services" (51 FR 32904).
In this policy statennt NRC states its belief that 10 CFR 50.47(b)TI2)
(*arrar.gements are made for medical services for contaminated injured O
individuals") requires pre-accident arrangements for medical services (beyond the maintenance of a list of treatment facilities) for individuals who might be severely exposed to dangerous levels of offsite radiation following an accident at a nuclear power plant. As used in 10 CFR 50.47(b)(12) and planning Standard
'L' of NUREG 0654/FEKA R[p.1, Revision 1, the tern "conta'ninated injured" means
- 1) contaminated and otherwise dangerous levels of radiation; physically injured; 2) contaminated and exposed to or 3) exposed to dangerous levels of radiation.
Guidance i
10 CFR 50.47 (b)(12) requires.that "Arrangements are made for contaminated injured individuals.' In its policy statement the NRC deterv.ined that this standard requires pre accident arrangements for medical services for offsite individuals who might be esposed to dangerous levels of radiation following an accident at a nuclear power plant.
The following guidance applies to the eval-wation of the medical services espects of State and local emergency plans under the criteria in NURIG 0654/f(PA-RCP-1.
Standards, tvaluations Criteria. Areas of Reviews and Acceptance Criteria A.
Assignment of Responsiblitty (Ornantration Control)
_lannino 5tandard p
Primary responsib111tles for emergency response by the nuclear facility O
lones have been assigned, the emergency responsibilities of the v 4
porting organizations have been specifically established, and each principal j
response organization has staf f to respond and to augment its initial esponse on a continuous basis.
I...
-. _. _ _ _ _ _... ~. _ _ _ _. _. _ _. _ _, _ _ _ _ _ _ _
7'
~
~
f 'L+T f-
[? N i[ [
h$
6 c~,
~
' December 2.1986 Page 3 of 12 2-w g
A.3. Evaluation Criterion
~
tech plan shall include written agreements referring to the concept of operations developed between federal, State, and local agencies and other support organizations having an emergency response role within the Emergency Planning Zones.
The agreements shall identify the emergency measures to be provided and the mutually acceptable criteria ior their implementation, and specify the arrangements for exchange of inforr.ation. These agreements may be provided in an;appendla _to the plan.or the plan itself may contain descriptions z
of these matters and a signature page in the plan may serve to verify the~
The signature page format is appropriate for crganizations where a greements.
response functions are covered by laws, regulations or esecutive orders where separate written agreements are not necessary.
Areas for Review and Acceptance Criteria State or local governments should obtain written agreements with the listed redical facilities (Planning Standard L. Evaluation Criteria 1 and 3) and trans-portation providers (Planning Standard L. Evaluation Criterion 4).
The written agreements should contain simple assurances that the providers have adequate technical information (e.g. treatment protocols) and treatment capabilities for handling "contaminated injured" individuals.
An indication of Joint Comission on Accreditation of Hospitals (JCAH) accreditation will suffice for such assurance.
(Note: Yeterans Administration (VA), military and other government hotDitals are not usually accredited by JCAH but usually have the desired capabilities.)
If state or local governments do not obtain written agreertnts, the licensee I
should obtain written agreements with the listed medical facilities and trans.
portation providers. If good faith efforts are not successful in a particulcr case, the licensee shall provide or arrange for adequate compensatory measures, e.g., obtain written agreements with other providers or provide temporary field medical care.
L.
Medical and Public Health Support
_ Planning Standard Arransments are made for medical services for contaminated injured indiv'daals.
4 1.1. Evaluation Criterion tach organization shall arrange for local and backup hospi91 and reditti services having the capet,ility for evaluation of radiatiot exposure and uptake.
including assurance that persons providing these services are adequately prepared to handle contaminated individuals, i
i
. Attachment 1 s.
sc l @ 86-98:
~ g
- l
~
- December t, 1986 Page 4 of 12
}
i
.3 1
4 E
4 p
- Areas for Review and Acceptance Criteria
)
There should be one primary local hospital and one backup hospital for each site for the evaluation and emergency treatment of "contamination injured' members of the general public. Hospitals are generally distributed proportional i
to the population. Thus, at sites with low pcpulation and few hospitals, the
{
primary local and backup hospitals for members of the general public could be the same as those for the utility erployees and emergency workers.
L.3. Evaluation Criterion m.
Each State shall develop lists indicating the location of public, private and military hospitals and other emergency medical services facilities within the State or contiguous States considered capable of providing medical support for any contaminated injured individual. The listing shall include the name, 3
location, type of facility and capacity and any special radiological capabili-ties. These emergency medical services should be able to radiologically O
monitor contaminated personnel, and have facilities and trained personnel able to care for contaminated injured persons.
Areas for Review and Acceptance Criteria The lists should be annotated to indicate the ambulatory /non ambulatory capaci-ties for providing medical support for "contaminated injured" members of the general public and any special radiological capabilities. This will enable state i
and local officials to direct members of the general public to those institutions capable of handling "contaminated injured" patients.
In the event that local and regicr,a1 medical resources need to be supplemented, additional redical re-sources would be available through the Federal Radiological Emergency Response Plan.
These resources would include the Rediation Emergency Assistance Center /
Training site at Oak Ridge Tennessee and the National Disaster Hedical System with headquarters in Rockville Maryland.
L.4. Evaluation Criterion tach organization shall arrange for transporting victims of radiological acci-dents to medical support facilities.
Areas for Review and Acceptance Criteria Secause the early symptces of persons exposed to dangerous levels of radiation I
are usually limited te nausea and vomiting, ambulances may not be required to transport such persons to eedical fact 11ttes. Rather non specialized public and private vehicles can be used, supported, if necess,ary, with agreements in accordance with A.3. above.
For other types cf contaminated injured individ-vals, speciallred transportation resources (e.g., ambulances) would be necessary and should be assured by agreements, if necessary, in accordance with A.3. above.
Provisions should be made for the use of contamination control in transporting contaminated persons to medical facilities.
..l
)
e IN 86 7 g 7,'
=
~
.c o
~
December 2. 1986
- w..
y vm ;
i
, y>c Page 5 of 12
+?
u.
Q 4
,. Plannino Standard y
0.' ~ Radiotsgicil'Emeroency Response Trainino Radiological emergency response training 1: provided to those who may be called on to assist in an emergency.
0.4. Evaluation criterion
~
Each organization shall establish a training program for instructing and l
speciellaedt nitial; training and periodic gical emergency response plan fying personnel whc will implement radiolo i
The retrainingprograms'(includingthe'
' scope, nature and frequency) shall be provided in the fo lowing categories:
h.' "Medical support personnel Areas for Review and Acceptance Criteria Each hospital listed under Evaluation Criteria L.1 and L.3. shall have at least one physician and one nurse on call eithin about 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br /> who can supervise the evaluation and treatment of radiologically "contaminated injured' members of the general public. There are several sources for this training including NRC licensee sponsored training. Transportation providers should have basic training in cc,ntamination control. Examples include but are r.ot limited to:
1.
FEFA handbook, videotape, slides and instruction manual titled "Hospital Emergency Department Management of Radiation Accidents," 58 80/198c.
2.
Courses free The Radiation Emergency Assistance Center / Training Site (RIAC/75) at Oak Ridge Associated Universities.
3.
Audiocassette and text course, ' Radiation Accident Preparedness: Medical and Managerial Aspects
- b 803, New York, NY 10016. y Science Thrv-Media Inc., 303 Fifth Avenue, Suite M.
tiercises and Drills Planning Standard periodic exercises are (will be gency response capabilities, per) iodic drills are (will beconducted to evaluate conducted to develop or 4rl11s are (will be), corrected.and maintain key skills and deficiencies fdentified a
]
, i t_
jP J Attachment 1
.e
.o e n
'y
~
in 86 98 (m
December 2.1986 Page 6 of 12
- LP,EvaluationCriterion A drill is a supervised instruction period aimed at testing, developing and maintaining skills in a particular operation. A drill is of ten a component of an exercise. A drill shall be supervised and evaluated by a qualif!ed drill instructor. Each organization shall conduct drills, in addition to the biennial aanval' exercise at the frequencies indicated below
c.
Medical emergency drills
. _ m _:
1-
"~ --
A medical emergency drill involving a simulated contaminated individual which contains provisions for'participat' on by the local support services agenci'es (i.e., ambulance and offsite siedical treatment facility) shall be conducted annually. The offsite portions of the medical drill may be performed as part of the required biennial annval' exercise.
Areas for Review and Acceptance Criteria State or local governments should provide for the cond;ct of appropriate drills and exercises which include "contaminated injured" individuals. These medical emergency del 11s involving the primary local (L.1.) hospital for state and local governments should be conducted annually. These drills should also test the capability of relocation centers to direct "contaminated injured" members of the general public to the apprcpriate hospital.
If State or local governments cannot provide for the conduct of the drills, the licensee shall provide for the con-duct of such drills.
If good faith efforts are not stccessful in a particular case, the licensee shall provide or arrange for adequate ccepensatory measures.
Implementation state and local emergency response plans shos1d reflect the provisions of this GM at the next annual update following g months from the effective date of this EM.
1 Plans fer plants that do not have a full power operating IIcense should reft.Lt the provisions of this M within 9 months of the effective date of this M.
The i
first medical drill reflecting the provisions of this M should be conducted by the end of the next biennial exercise following 1 year from the effective date of this M.
1 s
- Changes reflect language incorporated into M PR.,
~
2
.a.
'1,
'e y
- U" 41N 86 98 -
> :~
~
.. gm n:
- o 4
- e
.3
->c
. December 2,1986
. - 1.
l
~}
Page 7 of 12 4
s NRC-Coofdina' tion This Guidance Memorandum has been prepared in coordination with the NRC staff, As noted in the referenced ARC Policy Statement, the Comission has detercined that these modifications fall under the backfit rule's exception as necessary to bring facilities into compliance with a rule of the Comission.
if,
g
=
5 4.S a
f l
I l
I 5
i 1
'l
Att' chtnent 1 a
,.w
.In so-ye m.
0ecetroer 2,'1986 7
- .4 n-7 w
c M Page 8'ofl12 4
"Attachment 3*
f*ederel Register / Vol. St. No. ito / Wednesday. September 17, 1964 / Rates and Repfatione l evtl ed&tlensl anarsemente.the de dsten*l th4 Commlesfort itself fe ted Comm! sion leaves to the informed tot es hrst teme W question whether dneni a h uc ei.n. e.wn ie memben of et pubLc was w,hed ie
,rendag etodud antrie, seneralpiduce from Se Comminion.
ere ihe esett paramettre of h stalmally espwed to offsite radiaties fellowine as necenary enange mute for medical ecodentataevclear wer fec!bry Gut eerHces To fwifill this mandate h staff wm set otherwin md. end if se te (and TDM)licennes, appficenta, and willfun appr,priate what entent in sensi erind tWe pidenza to gentien, et Commfn!e newthi the state and lece! severnmente.
views of h putJo la et SONCS The Unlied States Court of Appeale pe,ce,&ng ndewsd es priadpol fse Se Dutrict of Cetumble (-Court
- voceted and tomandei e trevieve ]
purpens of W plannM4 etendut andysed es lathheed of serious Cer.minton laterpreist!*n dpfenn!ng upeems te Se Pvbilc neutring standerd (b)D2) whld retutted enir me sma senry medical Matinent and dente;fnent and maintenance of a list ova!.sted se of emerger>ct of tnotment fatihtles een wNeh post' hatraeat lael a be retwirti sesei en event,s/ Aec anangemente for medical tWe nyiew. e Comisinton conc!wded trestroent rowld be sesed CUAM f.
u a smrig mattu ht. (1) mnning MIC Fil TJd i164 (D C Cit.1961) atandard (b)tt!) enplied le hdividuale pending fwat Comminien action h
. bee enalte and effene (al_.
eesponse le the CUAMeemand, the N sotaalAtted imimd IRCvideels" we e o
Commleslee:luned a statement of lateeded to intivde prieuely trudiated lateria pidance wWah permitted.
members of the public es web as punsont to 10 CTR to artc)(1) th*
meabers ef et pub!!c who are met leewance of fw!! power licenses when serievsty trndleted but else oro W apphunt satisfied the regultsments M unsteal)y Inbrei kom eeet casses I
of planning atendard (b)(12) se end re&ologiuny sentem!aated. and (3)
{
interpreted by the Commission priot to Adeguata, post seddest arrangementa l
CUAM. and where the applicant forneeveggy met ut w atmentof committed to full compliance with the upond members of the pubts scrald be Comminion's Enai responn to the mede se as et.%e bes!:if emergency CUAM temand The comm!nten's s!us oestained e het oflocal hatment prior intarim pida net wi!! cent! ave to ledhden.
novern the I swante ofiWt powee Lcenses antJ inonu and On e; ped. Se Udted Sutes h M A pes! for the D C CucWI coorJuded P
leptementation of N NRC staff's specine pidance en this matter et gO h Cex-Julon had not nasoe. ably whid pomt se riew patiey will appfy, hierprtted plattdag studard (b)(12) when 11 generit4Dy found th at a pre-tmtTM oatt September 17.1H6' accident hat of treatment fat!1 lues eos evntwt a :=ronwarson cCWT ACT:
genstjtytgd "Anugtments* for post.
C Sebsstun Aloot.OfEct of the seddent me& cal treatment CUAM v.
Ceners1Cevntel U.S Nudeat MtC 7&3 T.141164 (D C Cai1943) Ter DiVht AR R[CULATORY R erJe tory Cort rais eIon. We shingt on, th's nanofi the Couti esuted and CCW W11560H DC Mill Telephone (202) AM-32J4-nmanded that part of the Commlulon's DumawIutAmf seonwAfices SONCS decislos ht be dinterynted 10 C FR Poet 50 planalng etandard (bX11)flocalle ntutre ordy l ashiducsies b peepoistien of a het o Emersenc3 Plan 61ag-4de Scal to h wthe dh nne Rfe taleed tre etant fa cibun. Hewrvn. In deus S* MC's occ) der 61la 1979. the Nudeu Replator es. et Couri asde ele as that de see wcy; %deat Rep! story Casaluton (*M or hulee*)y Coma!nte had a nmant in its awad
{#*?seted regdetiona requiring its dlienuen. finJb.hry in fuhlon!rd e Cornmluien.
"" " *^8 'PP *8"'dI*' D "8 " I*
R "W N' IAI"F"I'* N I4"M"i h
acTscus Statereent of poh on P
Emreency mnalag StarMard to CTR 'P'" " " " * I""d' " P'* "
'I'"#8'WUf Ofo'n'a',ife','c'i7ed ' ene'M. m* ^=a ra$ca **d t
- m d -'
cmut Amoe aces e..anmaa w-a Cru ne Nwde.,,, W.ie,,
Commle slen (-NR C" ee "C,ommis s ten")
to 4t(bXII)(*gtea standard Whea ortelad fesad wie h believ thai 10 CTR M44b)(II) !res SX13)*k *WCA ptevi ea:
gutstin whether;se t isn h
-'snn!mg studsrd (bX12f")tvqu (b)The ps;ie and offette seergency "senta rJn e t e d lejure g in& viduale" w e e
'stide ni e tsPgerments let medital sost+m pten fu setteer pe=ee resttore bitendeile entes4en.in!*r elia, a
he (beyond me malatensata of a meet mi e, f tte.ina stuJeds y, embers el h pwblic who, as a result Jf treatment fe Jhtin fee konidots who might be)suertig "
- 8" "4 ' * *" P ' 8 ' l" 'd '*1 erf en etcJdent.wm espond te
("l AN C'* "l*l
- d'*8WI' densnowe levels of re &stion. ee esposed le dargereve levela of ensite bi Scudern Coh/ernle Edsea Comm!nton fewad no esplicit and esd.stion sotto=ing en es Ideni et A Ceepony, elel. (Sea Ocofre N dese eenctwsive detriluu of the phtne la the.
oucte se power ytentMI14 sendedsg Cenersung Sieuen. Unite 3 ud 31. C13 septetien Itulf er its anderlying eet pla nair,g sta ndud (bXII) te guire s SS 10. tF NAC l24 (s to)(-SONGS) documente Nenableu &e
M 9f 1 -w o 1% ?
Page 9 of 12 3 eder:1 stertetee / Vol 31. No.1M / Wedneedey. Septernber 17. is e / Rutes and Resw'stiens 3ypas
~Co r.ar. nice ccacJ.ded tho' the Fewdent De tr.inimsft) nete eary The Co.minism hu determit.ed that e4 redvebe prpne of the artsegemente for the person that may be the ensgemenu caternp?sted snder Comm3sion's ng.f stiera et gvtred esposed need not be elaboaste. As this Statement of Pehr) are the bterpre ting pta v!rg sle ndard (b);12) to p tiiowel) stated b) the Comreinicm.
minimun. teguired 1y a resionable oppf) le avc2 efis.te e rposed li)'
- s nevet W intent of the ets ding of pluning stedstd (b)tt2) ted.isdeals 3 een W wnderl%ng etsstetiene le nquirt derst!r we Accordirs') thhowt tra.pfementaben of h
asswftption of et NPC"a t a>etgene/
ind. recti; that sts'e and local this reading of the standard mMlentall plannig regwlstier.s that e eetions gaiemmente edept entrnord:sary some edd. tons to. and some secsdent cowld octvt and the menev'es enti se egnetrwruen of modificshens of,the ernergeney Comm.esion penumption that eveh an add, lier.al hospitals a recruitment of procedarti and e ganisations for w)Jch occident e owld res uti to offshe owbstantist additionst mediul betraets en attirnately responsibla. h bd.sid.afe beiy espo*e4 le dartetous persennel. bst to de at w!th attlest tetufrements of the bedf.i rwie.10 CTR kiels o! rad.at.on [e perwepbon p! ant accidents "17 NRC el W3 Rather.
M 1C'l DDM1 for a costbenefit analy:Is conev nd in b the reder:1 Emugency W Commission behevts not and a hnd.ng that the cosu of the
&tanapt::ent Agene)) A.hrt seusfation) e tsniements sher:1d modif.catisms ut pseuf.ed b a ettosside-stet of ea matiet fo? towing include (1) e list of lou' or ngianal ewbstant,a' tneu s se in ufe') art act the CCMD decis;es the Ceulnlon medical treatment facil.ters sad apphuble. sloce these sod.f.ubou fall
> n de t de t to rt s?'.rre tLs FHet transportat,on prenden appropruuly undet the be dfit rwle's ettepton f or
>terpartsben of plw&4 standard avoteted to show etir up e ciben, me!.ficabons neceusr> to bang D)l12) special es;sb;bt.es or other ir.L facihties into cornpl.ance Mth a rde of Hs= ei er. Se Commisslon has come paractenstics (2) e good (alth ;ue the Cornn'asior. See 10 CyTs W 10e 6 e d.fferent rte.h with retrect to the etssonable elloit Dywcensen etlocAf ar (8,)(2 land s)(4)02M) The snelyils WWca the (MckLt rsle eetultes be doc musJmwe arnyements attessa fee state geismeents le faciLtete av obtala.
bd.sidssis who en ght be perious wtitten ag*eer.enu mith the hated le jushf; de appbubon of any ofits espeud. bwt not otherwise injm is e med, cal facIL0es and transperistten etception provietou soutilwtes the esd,otrg': emetjency b ensinally Presiders. p) proeision fee sha. hag sore of tkJ States > eat of Pokey.See M etsoftirg the stop ef s'rsr.pementa siellable nece etary tralr.1Ag fee 2 lateh Che los,e.the Com'n esin focused im the eme*3ency rt spoue Mrsotsal to part (dat retde of offsite esposed Idenbf). transport and promis in its prir statement of poliry. the led udwate for erre yency eeLui emergenry fet aid to userti; uposed Cemmin:o Idas t. Led three factors stweet of their rs die tion in)v*) in ind.sadsals &nd (4)e good faith tiiich hIbhed to ltteds pobfy OI e fashion the ComrJnice esde e reasonable effort b) Luanu of Sute cd ranting appbcasts for f4cwer local geiername nts to sp that Lcense an equitable encepton to tbt et. net or. bef m Hr. the ne ed be etate oe tiear term medicnican.
oppro;rists d.@ and etercian are etqwtrements of p!armig standard obci wu tn its view W gesl ef tendstled which include simuisted (b)(12) undtr 10 CFR W 478);1) where pienes eieds'd (b)!12) and the seea seiere1>.espned teimo, sis Lf g>od W eppbaan' tabahed Qe ngwiremeats for ter3 tern red uf u t As to fa.th e' forts s't not sv:c4:iM te e of p?snalsg standard @):12) as esposed andmd.ats the Cert.minton
- attitVet cue. the Leansee sh aD interpreled b) the Corr.tr.islion pner to i
losai h t pro.ide o' anvar for adegusts the CUA AD deciska and ces.mitted N enca' hin d is ruribi N mist;oe cce;msto y museret ceu; ate.at with itself to M: tem;t.inu trie ery I
sine. v te Oe po' est The setun et W CeMuion's te ta tt te LrrJi the add tions! rtthements leposed t'y the e, t e t e tr N s se tM *W a t e cal Sud Io' utra ordaar) mu sas nota d Corr.iss.on le response to the CUAAD trestw e'sae) be e e.s e rets. red to abone The carpersatca) mesens rtmand $tstement of Pohey ea n
r must be opptove8 b f.'RC. The ler:J of Iene* ene) Pienst.4 Standard to CTR uen e e siv.s n y ri tM n two m 3
erW; ne a ei s e r to ry s eid so m p?s nning m on,1d help (1) provide M 49);12) M TR rer. (his) n 1383)
(t pew pa+,e, To een tame L o r; et the add.benai s s ew/aste er Ge soepersuem The three latters wars 0)the Di e t# e t' rei ni gd f or rs L et.ps etpoed g[p,ggg}(,g;),g;ggg),g,gy,n,,pg, pog;biht) that @at scere of IlmnirJ l
be..Asie tv. des eas,w sed el'os P
3,sining D) ppm W nthM M etuds rd @)
rdt ;se bud, HJ
,,, _8le Lh, et t e.nm is va,ide unass,y unsa.
un ae,osf.Cvuo',,Iiu me.,,
e I
I 8#
treweh ddts and e n ordeos sowid be lessi to be 164;gst,sant d ** Le Frert INa, W CorrJulen ets occee ne Cerr.minte kn d.reeied b stas the lam Pnbabihts ontstudenu dwrmd est W log terr hateant riceds of to denlop. conelstent wie this W Intsra period, and 0) W peu.bary capened individesie taJd b*
Interpreteuen of W pterintne starmiard.
of *e$et etrpe!!ma etsenas* Mthiry see4. stet; met en et Aet hasta.
deteiled had spelf e t ldatte se the a brief euepher. wkart apphunts has After recenatderstion la kght of $s setste of the med, cal eervicee le be ethe d le good f ale spea pnee CUA AD deif sier W Ceralssin hsa eu!1stto u upped Lad.vidwela asd en Cee.mfasien hierprtubsa of SaarJrig s
amededed bl norse odd.tWal plantei W sp;huuan of p!nrJy staadud standard S);tt) ane ytis ents be we the dnelopment
@)DI) to NRC licensen end opphunts in thh Butamaat of Pcbe) late prettag of a list of arti1:.M feciLties are fee Leerae, to ennte ecmmerdal plare!^4 stasdud S)Oll W mecener) le p+svide additlpal settest penet notters no Comatulo deuh W NRC sist!le cerwipes of effective eonepement of Comm:n:n hn slae direded & staff des elop (la sus.h:1.en with fM) rgerney me d.ul se rvice s Ln the hows to testdet wheGet and medat wist andIsewehipu on tb eastiscalcun b st/pfu enreptiate sie lefle=teg e seven act4 dent.
triteHe it le meetsiery et apprepHate for detailed s
=eut. D e Cowrf ute tebnwes to W staff to verify $e approrrtstenste of of the tiecesser)de Ccer utsis e n a ge n ar.ts Leu iks) W lies term tre atment ininlet and dnl:e te entslite sensisteet s ie needJ of e apei tnd,tideals taa be estecisted mi$ (he handhr4 9f erlettly def trmlntflon that yt:Mlr4 S andard t
siegestei met p stbec 1Heis, espoird perects p)pg)ng tre ansgements fer medical f
m.,
- nment s s'. d6 98
, December 2. 1986
- Page;10 of 12
,s, q.,,
y.
- 7..
proos feder.1 nest.i.e i v.t. si, w, sea f w,dneed y. septim6r sum / Eti, ins medWs 7.
eentie g 3.nd se s.tareninie.r.
ii.i er n.eo.ung ve.untair.cuice.
c.mm:sii.n (..ed in4,,id..i. n. )
e r., noite n et.e.ei n i m. i..i.
reci.e.. disevi.es a dei.a la ne w.y :.
. im sr remeni.r P.uce...un i.
D.u,re.t.u.
aeinter;m pid.n.
e the p is.d n ce iery r.e se oc
.i.r: i. i...e.ne t,u nee s..,,i3unu, ed siste and i.u! e,emme.u i.
imre meni ae sei. fed pts.=..
neier.re.wia.nren.te sei.n d 41d.Me neletent wie $! p.isey 3.t.iern ent ie lie ve d ind ipptemente d.
Se utensira Be.rde may.enunv. i.
M ser..b!; find est en)4 St CTR l
be.etas eegard.eg tempf. ente w.
60 4*jb)(1r).h.!! b. Iamited t le ves which sould h.se been he.rd berare 6.
Court e decision in CUAAD e.MC.
Deted si % in.g n DC. $.s 114 day of,
Se p te nb< r. t.s.e g
re' ee Net!e er Ber.if ele *y Comaash Samwll CMk.
...,7,".
Snmen.f ho commissin
.+.
~-u 7B Ds 46 7)Na r led 6164L t.s ses) mams esos Psee4se l
e l
l 9
4
.n m
. Attachment 1..
3;,
3}N ssagg -
~
December 2. 1986 f~ ^x
(
Page 11 of 12 7 [ Federal Emergency Management Agency Washington, D.C. 20472 Attachnent C Novwber 13, 1986 CPERATIVE GUI[WCE MDORANM Nrter
[hte Title 4
4/1/10 Radio Transmission rroquencies and Coverage a xJ u w
v.v s 5
4/1/80 Apreenents Anorg Govermental Agen:les and Private (Revised-Parties 10/19/U) 8 4/2/83 Regional Advisory Ccruittee Ccordination with Utilities (Fevised-10/19/0 )
16 8/7/80 Standard Regional Re/lewing and Reportirn Procedures for State and local Radio 1ccical De:gency Respcnse Plans 17 1 / 8/ 81 Joint Exercise Procedures 18 5 / 2 1 / 81 FD% Mtion to Qualify Alert and Notification Systers (Pcvised-Against NJPE-Ot54/TD%-RD-1, Fe/.1 10/19/83) 20 10/19/83 Foreign Lavaage Translation of Public Education Brochures and Safety Messays 21 2/27/84 A:ceptance Criteria for Eva:uation Plans l
22 10/19/O Recordkeepire Requirerents for Public Meetirns 24 4/5/84 Radiolcgical Dergen:y Preparedness for Hardicap;ed Persons n -1 1/15/85 Remedial Exercises m-2 7/15/85 Staff support in tvaluatirq R F hercises PR-1 10/1/15 Policy on WRm-4654/FD%-RD-1 ard 44 Cnt 350 Periodic mequirerents A
r-.,
,----.n
.i
'IN 86 98 y,
a Dece..ber 2,' 1986 Page 12 of 12 '
x 2
IT-1 10/1/95 A Guide to k>:ments Related to the RD Program PI-1 10/2/05 IDW Action to Pilot Test GuidaN:e on Public Infomation Materials and Prcnide Technical Assistance on Its Use
. FR-1 12/3/95 Federal Response Center MS-1 11/13/86 Medical Services D/-2*
11/13/86 Prote:;tive A.tions for School Children
- GM-21 will be retitled as GM EV-1 Wen it is rwised.
4 J!
^
0 l
t i
j l
l a
e i
b a
i u;_
A IN 86-98L y
.., s,
. - c
- December 2, 1986 e',
,fo>-
. 'F I J'^'
LIST OF RECENTLY ISSUED C
IE INFORMATION NOTICES Information Date of Notice No.
Subject Issue Issued to 86 97 Energency Comunications 01/28/86 All power reactor System facilities holding an OL or CP and fuel facilities 86-96 Heat Exchanger Fouling Can 11/20/86 All power reactor Cause Inadequate Operability facilities holding Of S&rvice Water Systems an OL or CP 86 95 Leak Testing fodine-125 11/24/86 All NRC licensees sealed Sources in Liri, Inc.
authorized to use leaging Devices and Bone Lixi, Inc. imaging Mineral Analyzers devices 86-94 Hilti Contrete Expansion 11/6/86 All power reactor Anchor Bolts facilities holding an OL or CP 86-93 IEB 85-03 Evaluation Of 11/3/86 All power reactor O
Motor Operators Identifies facilities holding i
Irproper Torque Switch an OL or CP Settings l
86 82 Failures Of Scram Discharge 11/4/86 All power reactor l
Rev 1 Volume Vent And Drain Valves facilities holding an OL ot CP B6-92 Pressurizer Safety Valve 11/4/86 All PWR facilities l
Reliability holding an OL or CP 86-91 Liriting Access 11/3/86 All power reactor Authorizations facilities holding i
an OL or CP; fuel fabrication and processing facilities 86 90 Requests To Dispose Of Very 11/3/86 All power reactor Low Level Radioactive Waste facilities bolding Pursuant to 20 CFR 20.302 an OL or CP O
OL = Operating 1icense CP = Construct. ion Permit
-