ML20205N956

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Notice of Violation from Insp on 860201-0331
ML20205N956
Person / Time
Site: Vogtle Southern Nuclear icon.png
Issue date: 04/18/1986
From:
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:
Shared Package
ML20205N947 List:
References
50-424-86-09, 50-424-86-9, NUDOCS 8605210023
Download: ML20205N956 (4)


Text

.

APR 181986 ENCLOSURE 1 NOTICE OF VIOLATION Georgia Power Company Docket No. 50-424 Vogtle 1 License No. CPPR-108-The following violation was identified during an inspection conducted on February 1 - March 31,1986. The Severity Level was assigned in accordance with the NRC Enforcement Policy (10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C).

10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion V, and the accepted Quality Assurance (QA) Program (FSAR 17.1.5) collectively require that activities affecting quality be prescribed by procedures and be accomplished in accordance with these procedures. Field Procedure GD-A 49, System Walkdown and Master Tracking System Punchlist Input, Revision 0 details criteria for system walkdown and punchlist development. Paragraph 6.0 of this procedure details instructions for discipline system engineers and contractor personnel to use whilc conducting a walkdown for piping, piping supports, mechanical equipment, electrical equipment, instrumentation, and civil /HVAC equipment.

Paragraph 6.2.1 states in part to walkdown the system using the latest piping and instrument diagram (P&ID) and isometric drawings. Paragraph 6.2.2 gives a list of typical examples of items to check during the walkdown such as:

o All piping and piping components installed and laid out according to the P& ids.

o Check valves, globe valves, strainers, traps, flow orifices (when installed prior to Nuclear Operations) installed in correct direction, o Instrument installation is according to instrument installation details and vendor-supplied information.

Startup Manual (SUM) Procedure No. SUM-17, Revision 6, Paragraph 6.2.1 states, in part "The system punchlist shall identify all outstanding work activities for components scoped into that system / subsystem or area / room, including outstanding documentation deficiencies, associated with the specific system, subsystem or component."

Contrary to the above, activities affecting quality were not adecuately implemented in that NRC walkdowns of portions of the Residual Her' "emoval (RHR) System and the Nuclear Service Cooling Water (NSCW) System conducted on March 7,11, and 12,1986, revealed the following discrepancies:

o RHR Train B, Valve No. 1-1205-X-403 was found not to be installed, o RHR Trains A and B, Valve Nos. 1-1205-04-120 and 1-1205-U4-121 were found to be installed in the incorrect flow direction (i.e., flow is over seat).

8605210023 860418 PDR ADOCK 05000424 O PDR

f APR 181985 l

Georgia Power Company 2 Docket No. 50-424 Vogtle 1 License No. CPPR-108 o NSCW Trains A and B, Valve Nos. 1HV-11707 and 1HV-11621 were found to be installed in the incorrect flow direction.

o NSCW Trains A and B, Valve Nos. 1PSV1718 and 1PSV1719 were found to be installed on the outlet side of the auxiliary component cooling water (ACCW) heat exchanger. The Piping and Instrumentation Diagram (P&ID) shows it to be installed on the inlet side.

o NSCW Train A, Temperature Element Nos. ITE-11641, 1TE-11642, 1TE-11643 and 1TE-11644 were found to be installed in reverse order to that shown on the P&ID.

o NSCW Train A, Valve Nos. 1-1202-X-312 and 1-1202-X-313 were found to be in reverse locations to that shown on the P&ID.

In summation, the construction walkdown was not adequate in that the above noted discrepancies were not identified during the system turnover as required by Field Procedure GD-A-49 conducted on or about September 18, 1985, for RHR and September 14, 1985 for NSCW. In addition, none of the above items were identified following turnover by the test engineers as required by SUM-17.

This a Severity Level IV vici>. tion (Supp'.ement II).

Pursuant to 10 CFR 2.201, you are required to submit to this office within 30 days of the date of this Notice, a written statement or explanation in reply, incluaing: (1) admission or denial of the alleged violations; (2) the reasons for the violations if admitted; (3) the corrective steps which have been taken and the results achieved; (4) corrective steps which will be taken to avoid further violations; and (5) the date when full compliance will be achieved.

Security or safeguards information should be submitted as an enclosure to facilitate withholding it from public disclosure as required by 10 CFR 2.790(d) or 10 CFR 73.21.

Date:

1 0

APR 181995

ENCLOSURE 1 NOTICE OF VIOLATION l Georgia Power Company Docket No. 50-424
Vogtle 1 License No. CPPR-108 The following violation was identified during an inspection conducted on February 1 - March 31,1986. The Severity Level was assigned in accordance with j the NRC Enforcement Policy (10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C).

I 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion V, and the accepted Quality Assurance (QA) Program (FSAR 17.1.5) collectively require. that activities affecting quality be prescribed by urocedures and be accomplished in accordance with 1

these procedures. Field Procedure GD-A-49, System Walkdown and Master Tracking System Punchlist Input, Revision 0 details criteria for system walkdown and punchlist development. Paragraph 6.0 of this procedure details instructions for discipline system engineers and contractor personnel to use while conducting a walkdown for, piping, piping supports, mechanical equipment, electrical equipment, instrumentation, and civil /HVAC equipment.

Paragraph 6.2.1 states in part to walkdown the system using the latest piping and instrument diagram (P&ID) and isometric drawings. Paragraph 6.2.2 1 gives a list of typical examples of items to check during the walkdown such 1 as:

i o All piping and piping components installed and laid out according to i the P& ids.

o Check valves, globe valves, strainers, traps, flow orifices (when I

installed prior to Nuclear Operations) installed in correct direction, o Instrument installation is according to instrument installation details

and vendor-supplied information.

Startup Manual (SUM) Procedure No. SUM-17, Revision 6, Paragraph 6.2.1 states, in part "The system punchlist shall identify all outstanding work activities for components scoped into that system / subsystem or area / room, including outstanding documentation deficiencies, associated with the specific system, subsystem or component."

Contrary to the above, activities affecting quality were not adequately implemented in that NRC walkdowns of portions of the Residual Heat Removal (RHR) System and the Nuclear Service Cooling Water (NSCW) System conducted on March 7, 11, and 12, 1986, revealed the following discrepancies:

o RHR Train B, Valve No. 1-1205-X-403 was found not to be installed.

I o RHR Trains A and B, Valve Nos. 1-1205-04-120 and 1-1205-04-121 were found to be installed in the incorrect flow direction (i.e., flow is over j seat).

i i

i 4

.- ..- - , , , , -. c ,~- - - - - ,- - , , , ,. - - - - , , - - - - - ~ . . , _ . . _ . , . . . - . , - , . - , , ,

-n,--,n -,v-n.....nn,,. , e,

, APR 181986

- Georgia Power Company 2 Docket No. 50-424 Vogtle 1 License No. CPPR-108 o NSCW Trains A and B, Valve Nos. 1HV-11707 and 1HV-11621 were found t be installed in the incorrect flow direction.

o NSCW Trains A and B, Valve Nos. 1PSV1718 and 1PSV1719 were found to be installed on the outlet side of the auxiliary . component cooling water l (ACCW) heat exchanger. The Piping and Instrumentation Diagram (P&ID)

? shows it to be installed on the inlet side, f o NSCW Train A, Temperature Element Nos. 1TE-11641, 1TE-11642, ITE-11643 and 1TE-11644 were found to be installed in reverse order to that shown

on the P&ID.

o NSCW Train A, Valve Nos. 1-1202-X-312 and 1-1202-X-313 were found to be in reverse locations to that shown on the P&ID.

In summation, the construction walkdown was not adequate in that the above 4

noted discrepancies were not identified during the system turnover as required by Field Procedure GD-A-49 conducted on or about September 18, 1985, for RHR and September 14, 1985 for NSCW. In addition, none of the above items were identified following turnover-by the test engineers as required by SUM-17. ,

i This a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement II).

i Pursuant to 10 CFR 2.201, you are required to submit to this office within 30 days of the date of this Notice, a written statement or explanation in reply, including: (1) admission or denial of the alleged violations; (2) the reasons for the violations if admitted; (3) the corrective steps which have been taken and the results achieved; (4) corrective steps which will be taken to avoid further violations; and (5) the date when full compliance will be achieved.

Security or safeguards information should be submitted as an enclosure to facilitate withholding it from public disclosure as required by 10 CFR 2.790(d) or 10 CFR 73.21.

1 Date:

h i~