ML20205N473
| ML20205N473 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 01/16/1984 |
| From: | Potapovs U NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | Milam S AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20204B851 | List:
|
| References | |
| REF-QA-99900403 NUDOCS 8704030035 | |
| Download: ML20205N473 (1) | |
Text
q p 3..- ;~
~ - -. -
e 4 " "'I*r UNITE *) STATES 6
'9 y
NUCt. EAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
$.* 'N REGION IV
.?
811 RYAN PLAZA DRIVE. SUITE 1000 o '" *
- 8 JAN 1o EN ARUNGTON. TEXAS 78011 SAN 16124 t,*s **
t
- ffWD JAN 181994 Sam A. Milam, III P. O. Box 21633 h.
San Jose, CA 95151
Dear Mr. Milam:
Please find enclosed, the report you provided to the NRC regarding the processing of deferred verifications at General Electric (GE). Our initial inspection has been completed at GE with respect to this area; therefore, your report is being returned to you.
Also, enclosed is a copy of the NRC Inspection Repo,rt.No. 99900403/83-03 issued as a result of our inspection. The area of de'ferred verifications is discussed in Section E.1 of the report. The lack of control of deferred verification was identifiedasanitemofnonconformange..
Thank you for your concern.
Sincerely, ihYW Uldis Potapovs, Chief Vendor Program Branch
Enclosures:
j i.
1.
" Deferred Verifications," a report by Sam A. Milam, III, dated l
1 July 11, 1983 (total pages-67) 2.
NRC Inspection Report No. 99900403/83-03 p.
-L l
l 8704030035 870323 PDR GA999 ENVGENE 99900403 PDR l N -,
= - -
. cy 4.
~
4.
$. s'l DEFERRED VERIFICATIONS A Report by Sam A. Milam III July 11,1983 N
O e
Q*
- e
! W GGG-50--S;tep.
t
cT^
~ ~ -
A' DEFERRED VERIFICATIONS Disclaimer.
.This report is based on my experience in GE's Control &
Instrumentation Department, in San Jose, California.
My last day of employment in the Control & Instrumentation Department was April 30, 1962.
The information' presented in this report may be affected by subsequent changes within the Control &
Instrumentation Department of which I am unaware.
D 4
e e
11
gg.
x..
DEFERRED VERIFICATIONS Contents
.Page Introduction
.1 The Requirement.
2 Design Documents 3
The Engineering Information System 6'
Deficiencies 7
Resolution Efforts 16 Conclusions 53 Recommendations 5 14 4
References 55 Appendix 56 e
d iii
' C 'p.,,.
DEPERRED VERIFICATIONS Introduction
.In this report, I have addressed the practice of deferred verifications within the Control & Instrumentation Departmeht (C&ID) of the General Electric Company's nuclear energy business, headquartered in San Jose,- California.
What I have presented is based on my personal observations and activities and is intended to provide information which might lead to the resolution of the deferred verification problems described herein.
Where appropriate, I have included pages from applicable procedures, and items from my personal work record.
Cross references which appear on work record items were originally used.for tracking within the work record.
Such referenced items are not necessarily included in this report.
1
3, p.
' I)EPERRED VERIFICATIONS
- The Requirement 4
Design verification requirements are established by 10' CPR 50, Appendix B, and apply to safety related structures, systems and components.
All designs for such structures, systems and components, including both initial designs and design changes, require formal design verification.
This requirement is implemented within C&ID by procedures which require that verification of the design (or design change) must be complete e
before the controlling documents can be issued.
Deferred l
verification is an exception.. When a deferred verification i
is performed, the required verification activities are postponed until some time after the formal issue of one or more controlling documents.
Administrative control,of deferred verifications must assure that 1.
every document which has a deferred verification is so identified, 2.
every deferred verification is eventually completed,
- and, 3
completion of verifications which have been deferred is as rigorous as the completion of normal verifications, including traceability to and retrievability of verification records.
i 2
l
,,--,.--.-...--.nn-._..,,,,-
a.
- c. -
- A%.
k,
,y e *. w. s I w
r 1 13 :, 7,..
DEPERRED VERIFICATIONS
~
Design Documents Controlling design documents (drawings,. specifications, etc.)
are issued within C&ID by engineering review memoranda (ERM's) and changed by engineering change notices (ECN's).
When a new issue or a change involves a deferred verification, the ERM or ECN shows this t;o be tne case.
However, no such inoication appears on the arrected design document.
Instead, a record or dererred verification is made in the Engineering Information System (EIS), described next.
The record or dererred verirication k
is made in EIS by the use of a Design Verification Status Change Notice (DVSCN).
The record or deferred verification can be removed from EIS by another DVSCN.
Figures 1 and 2 show simplified issue and change cycles.
3
ii' i[;
.- ; e*
1[4 o
sc sn e
e oe sc c
rr sn n
Ce oe e
f rr sr oe Ce se NR f
of oe re NR CR t
t n
k n
ee ne ng gm N
N aa l
i u C
C mr M
sc S
S ro R
eo V
V et E
j DD D
D PS 8 ;
r s
eY e
?e o
r 1
t N
e lp mo C
no it da g
ec n
ri im rf ke ei ct fr as ee ry I
DV TS
]
l
[
t t
n n
s ne ne s
gm gm N
ee iu i u C
uc M
sc M
sc S
so e
R eo R
eo V
sr l
E DD E
DD D
IP cy C
s:
e e
Y uss I
?
d d
o e
N s
e ws i
if ee f
i ic i
r vo l
er p
e V
RP m
iS t
1 n
s ne ns e
gm ge r
iu ic u
sc so g
er i
eo DD DP F
I::'
~
c.
'l-i
~!
t
~j Yes ECN
- ECN j,
Design erified h
j Document Design j
Document Cross
]
No Reference i
+
j
' r ECH u
Design
' Document Design No Cross
'i Document Reference
.l DVSCN
- DVSCN 4
No Cross i
Deferred Yes Reference g
Verification omplete
- - DVSCN 1
o 1
Design Review Issue Tracking Permanent j
Process Process Process System Storage s
T i
Figure 2.
Simplified Change Cycle 1
S
1.".
DEFERRED VERIFICATIONS The Engineering Information System The Engineering Information System is a computerized data storage system which can be used to retrieve engineering documentation information, cross Yeferenced in a variety of different ways.
The systen is useful for determining current document status and application information.
However, the data is not revision contro11edr nor is old information retrievable from the system because old data is destroyed when the data base is updated.
e e
I
+
6
i..
DEFERRED VERIFICATIONS Deficiencies Following is a list of the deficiencies that I have discovered in the control of deferred verifications.
With each deficiency I have shown a possible corrective action.
4 as e
a 7
a
.s;
(*, 4 DEFERRED VERIFICATIONS Deficiencies Verification status is not shown on the controlling design documents.
Display of document status information is controlled by the Engineering Documentation Practices Manual, Section C1, shown on the next page.
Although verification status is available in EIS and on the various change documentation (ERM's and ECN8s),
requirements (and common practice) do not always include searches for verification status when documents are used.
Thus, the documents are routinely used without any interest in their verification status.
Examples I have seen include:
1.
use of unverified documents as source documents for changes in other controlling design documents.
2.
production and shipment of hardware whose design includea unverified documents.
3 technical review of Final Safety Analysis Reports using unverified documents, i
4 responses to customer and NRC questions usin6 unverified documents.
RESOLUTION - This deficiency could be resolved by showing the verification status on the design document.
6
~
U y,.
CENER AL h ELECTRIC SECTION N
I PAGE 0-24-79 ENGINEERING DATE
/
)
DOCUMENTATION PRACTICES SUPER $cDES 12-20-78 (wat R3)
~
' COMPLETION STATUS CODES 1.
PURPOSE.
3.
PROCEDURE.
1.1.
This documentation practicit estab-3.1. *Oraftino. Specification, and-lishes the procedure's to be followed for Standards.
the use of Completion Status Code symbols on documents' and in the Engineering
- 3.1.1 each product drawing, InformationSystem(EIS)..
s ci nd separate parts list or for issue or application with 1.2.
For background info'nnation on EIS 1 that indicates the completion '
see the EIS User's Manual. NEDE-2456 tus of the document.
'and E0P 30-4.00, Engineering Inf io
- ystem.
. a.
Use the applicable symbol from the -
S list in paragraph 21 t
- 2. ' SYMBOLS.
~
- b. Add or change the symbol as neces-2.1' ICERSymb41s(to Use on Docuru6t sary to reflect the document status, and in EIS.
U V
c.
Place the symbol o*n the first sheet I - Incomplete for internal reasons of the document. See Figure 1.
(
(awaiting GE input) 3.1.2.
Completion status symbols are C - Complete not used on sketches or on Master Parts Lists.
E - Incomplete for externsi reasons (awaiting Customer or Supp1,1er 3.2.
Plant Definition and Advanced input)
Systems Development.
R - Incomplete for both internal and 3.2.1.
Enter the I, C E, or R symbol external reasons.
.shown on the document authorized for issue or application into EIS when no 2.2.
SUN Symbols For Use in EIS But restraints exist.
Not on Documents.
3.2.2.
When an incomplete (I, E, or R) 5-- Incomplete document document is identified by the Responsible (no work planned)
Engineer as one for which no work is planned, enter an --S.- as defined in U-- Unverified or deferred design paragraph 2.2. into EIS. The completion status code (I, E, or R) on the document N-- Not evaluated (entered in EIS before will not be changed.
implementation of Completion Status Code) 3.2.3.
When a document is identified on an Engineering Review Memorandum or Engineering Change Notice as an un-verified or deferred document, enter a
--U-- as defined in paragraph 2.2 into EIS. The completion status code (I, C, E, or R) on the document will not be changed.
M,.
. b r-mu-+ag e+s..,
em 4N. -
DE.FERRED VERIFICATIONS l-Doriciencies When an ERM is written to issue a document with a deterred verification, the necessary accompanying DVSCN (see the procedur'5 '"' * *"-*
shown on the next page) is often not written.
Thus, the record 1
' cf deferred verification is not made in EIS.
When an ECN is written to make a design change with a deferred verification, the necessary accompanying DVSCN is often not written.
- Again, the record of deferred verification is not made in EIS.
Without a
j this record, the deferred verification is not visible and the possibility exists that it will be forgotton and never completed.
l-NOTE - Erforts within C&ID to track completion commitments 1
T.&9T pm.hkx.C4 l
for deferred verifications in such systems as the Work Planning
.n f
and Scheduling System (WPSS) and the Nuclear Engineering
'.thi,6sCM
- a ny,l.n:1
'.7 j
- Management System (NEMS) have not succeded in assuring
- f5.t.,Qg U.lf,Ie;'f.f...
1
..~.,,.[y fl
[
completion of deferred verifications, particularly when
. ;. % g I
l commitments are for the completion of deferred verifications l,}jg:y f
,. I!Nh[i 1
which cannot be found.
i, n:y,h RESOLUTION - If the verification status shown on the ERM
- ~,
- i cr the E'CN was recorded on the design document itself, the l
cocompanying DVSCN and resulting EIS entry would not be necessary.
)
EIS could be updated for information only, if desired, from either the ERM, the ECN, or the design document.
1 1
10
e t...
EMPLOYEES ONLY
(
ENGINEERING OPERATING PROCEDURE E0P 42-6,00 4.1.2 Deferring Verification When verification is deferred until after design document issue due a.
to incomplete design or other reasons, state on the ERM/ECH issuing or applying the document or on the Desien Verification Status _qh.angs Notice required by Pararrach b.. below:
1.
That verification is deferred 2.
The reason for deferral 3.
A schedule for performing the verific tion 4.
The DRF reference if applicab 5.
The signature of the n bin Engineer's section Manager authorizing deferr t
Ib.
Notifv Ensin a 1 by n inn an accompanyint Desita ange Noti Yformthatidentifiesthe Verificatiot document t
\\cheduled dat ol red verification completion. DRF
~
reference applicable, an d bution identical to that of the issued document.
i
^
When verification is deferred for designs to be released, initiate
(
c.
releases per EOF 42-5.00, Engineering Requirements Document Release.
d.
Assure that verification is completed in accordance with the schedule committed, following the requirements of Faragraphs 4.1.la through 4.1.1f.
When deferred verificatirn is completed, notify Engineering Services 1 e.
by processing a DVSCN form that identifies the verified documents DAF containing verification, completion date, and distribution identical to that of the issued document.
4.1.3 Performing Additional Verification When additional verification is required af ter document issue or a.
application, advise Engineering Services 1 to revise the verification status of the document to " unverified" by processing a DVSCN that identifies the document (s), completion date, Section Manager's endorsement and distribution identical to the issuing ERM/ECN.
l M
Aumonuso sv issuno suranssoas sPP scTavery 3_
PACE 12 DIVISION l
cantRAt. MANAcER 4/30/81 4/4/80 4/30/81 or
,y_
I.
~ %..' -
DEFERRED VERIFICATIONS i
Dericioneies Design documents are often used without reference to EIS.
In fact, many users (for example, subcontractors, or users in the field) might not even have access to EIS.
Thus, even if the verification status is correctly shown by EIS, it may not be known to the user.
RESOLUTION - This deficiency would be resolved if the
~
verification status were shown on the document itself.
l e
9 e
f 5
l 12 4
4
._.2..,_.-,-.- -.._,_- _
i
- 1..
DEFERRED VERIFICATIONS Deficiencies The EIS' data is not revision controlled.
Previous EIS data is not retrievable because old data is destroyed when the data base is updated.
Since EIS is the intended means for tracking deferred verifications, the history of the verification status of a document is difficult to reconstruct.
RESOLUTION - A permanent record, showing the verification status of each revision or a document would be easily retrievable it ttle verirication status were shown on the document itself.
o O
8 e
13 t
e 3;-
DEFERRED VERIFICATIONS Deficiencies The record of deferred verification can be removed from EIS by the transmittal of a DVSCN.
The DVSCN needs only the signature of the responsible engineer.
No verifier signature or other evidence of independent design verification is necessary.
Thus, it is possible to remove the record of deferred verification from EIS without any verification having been done.
RESOLUTION - This deficiency could be resolved by requiring the DVSCN to show evidence of review equivalent to, that shown on an ERM or an ECN before the DVSCN could be used to remove a record of deferred verification.
e 4
14 I
l l
[...,<..7_
b_
w.4 DEFFRRED YkRIFICATIchs x
g![y,;ioncies
)
No traceability viists from a document with a dererred verirication to th LV CN which is used to snow completion or the verification.. Thus, given a document with a dererred verification, it is not possible to show that the verification has been completed, even it it has.
RESOLUTION - When a deferred verification is completeo,
- 1. sgive the DVSCN the same number as the ERM or ECN-which orested the deferred verification, and 2.
file the DVSCN in Document Control with the ERM or ECN ror which it was written.
Since the document with the deterred verification already refers to'the ERM or ECN, this will establish traceability to the completion record.
m I
O f
15 e
t, DEFERRED VERIFICATIONS Resolution Errorts I am one of many people to be involved in the errort to resolve the problems associated with dererred verifications.
Following is a list or documentation which indicates the extent of the errort.
t 9
ee m
- o +m e a
16
- a
~~ ~ GEN ER AL C, ELECTRIC CONTROL & INSTRUMENTATION DEPT.
OUALITY ASSURA8eCE SAN JOSE.CALIPORNIA
, March 19,1982
$tf8JECTr-Synopsis of eventivti.s77r5TWee ing 'Difer7eV'Vsificitiiin."ConditTonal "' ~
Release and Qualification / Dedication Programs.
A review of the files in this office on above subject items provides a lengthy and complex history trail of events which are capsuled into chronological order as follows:
1.
July 19,1976 - Letter from L.D. Test (NCAID Engineering) to J. Ward (Manager QA NC&ID) identified that QA was responsible only for the product meeting the design and Engineering was responsible for the design adequacy prior to issue. He recognized the deferred verification problem and advised that Dave Lee would review engineering procedures.
Also NC&!D Engineering would assign dates compatible with shipping l
requirements and monitor for conformance.
~
2.
Auaust 9.1976 - Letter from D.C. Brown to J. Ward documents a meeting of August 5th with D.E. Lee, 8.J. 8each and D.F. Long. Several points l
were establ shed but most important were as follows:
a) Engineering was now keeping track of all deferrals; b) A new E0P was in process; cj Procedure for clearing needed improvement; dp NC&ID was to continue present shipping practice; ej 8en Beach had assignment to follow up with an action plan.
i 3.
January 1977 (ajproximately January 25th) a meeting of J. Ward and D.C. Brown was ield with D.F. Long D.E. Lee where subjects of deferred verification, engineering interchangeability and product quality certi-fication of engineering work were discussed. Jim Ward's notes on the letter prepared for this meeting indicate that we were to "back off a little" on our request for status information by February 15th. General outcome of the meeting was that they would continue to pursue all three subjects.
e 0
- w.. - - ' -
i-
'8EN ER AL O iticiaic March 19,1982 Page 2 Re: Conditional Releases 4
April 21.1978 8WR Oua11tv Council - Jchn Barnard identified an item
" Control of Products Produced to unverified Designs (78-2-1)." He expressed concern on the subject of conditional releases and required i
letter reports from C&I, Wilmington and EEP0 QA organizations be trans-mitted to Council by May 18, 1978 as to controls in place for such items.
J.K. Powledge responded on April 28, 1978. His main points were (1)
(a)
In a review with D.F. Long it was agreed that systems to control shipments i
l on unverified designs did not exist in NEED. (2) The Design Engineers must have positive and contractural means to prevent shipments until he l
ha< accomplished the design verificatfo.c.
o
_t )
T. Duke (acting for R. Robinson) signed a letter prepared by D.C. Brown i
(b on May 8,1978 which had main points as follows:
(1) There was not a system in place in Manufacturing and none should
'[
be required.
(2) The Engineering Control System should provide the follow-up to
]
assure the completion of required Engineering work.
(3) If further Engineering communication is required on such items then j
EI's or FDI's should be used as appropriate.
i (c) May 11.1978 - Alex Kaznoff letter to R. Robinson referred to the May 8th letter and quoted the requirement of E0P 40-5.00 that conditional released items shall not be shipped until verification is complete and l
l said that Manufacturing must have a system for handling unverified designs.
l Letter to Anders, Long, Rubio and $ tone from Earnard documents May 25.1978 -
5.
an agreement of a May 25th meeting for NEED Engineering Services Operation to provide to NC&ID (for Farmount) all of the detailed services assilned bf E0P 40-5.00 for the balance of 1978. To be reevaluated in October 178 fo 1979.
June 9.1978 - Letter from H. Hendon to C&! Engineering Unit Managers advised 6.
that audits disclosed that the conditional release requirements of E0P 40-
~
5.00 and Group instruction 70-11 were not being met. He directed that:
j
" Conditional release" be identified on EI's for incomplete or deferred (a) l verification designs.
l (b) Include QA Subsection Managers on " conditional release" distributions.
i (c)
Issue amending EI's by July 15, 1978 for all releases made since Sept.
marking " conditional" where applicable.
29, 1977 Remove the " conditional" when completed, clear with projects, commit (d)
Provide date and obtain written shipping approval when not completed.
i QA with approval and assist with PQC if requested.
(e) Establish a date for each Conditional El and enter into WPSS.
J (f) Contact *L.D. Test with any questions.
i
!W 1
l
SEN ER AL $ ELECTRI,C arch 19,'1982 Nge 3 Re: Conditional Releases 7.
June 19.1978 - Letter from D.C. Brown to D.H. Ferguson recommended a change to MP 5.06 to uttitze the CMR to control c.onditionally released items and recommended that MP 5.10 be revised to provide for a conditional purchase order with hold-points at suppliers facility or elsewhere to control release of items.
8.
June 28,1978 - Letter from R.F Hennessey (Engineering Services Operation) to M.M. Hendon and C&IE Subsection Managers advising of an audit of the deferred verification system to be held June 30th _and, @,1,L t,h,,,,
5 3
l 9.
July 18.1978 - Letter from H. Hendon to A. Rubio responding to a request to l
describe the procedures which assure that design verifications are closed out He relied on the followin (a) ERM issue, (b) WP55 Schedule, P(rior to start up.C) " Conditional Release" EI, (d) Audits. (e)g: Change to EIs System b 15, 1978 to track to highest MPL number.
- 10. Avaunt 1.1978 - Quality Control Report (unsigned but from Bob Hennessey and Lou "est and obviously a draft copy) shows results of audit of 27 deferred verifications. Contained many recommendations for action and particularly in EIS.
Indication was that EIS would correct this in early 1979.
In the interim it recomended distribution of the deferred verification WP55 run to the Engineering Release Group in Engineering Services and to QA in NEED and NE90.
- 11. Avoust 7.1978 - Letter from H.Hendon to D.H. Ferguson advises that Engineering intends to continue to have the responsible engineers who prepare the EI's assure that the documents released are verified and complete and to. follow E0P requirements. However, he also said that D. Long's people had agreed to modify the Engineerinq Information System to show at both the document level and' ship-pable MPL leve' the status of verification. They comitted to have this in place FW 7837. Hendon also said that Rubio agreed with this but was concerned that it did not force closure. Hendon proposed that QC check EIS prior to PQC preparation (for complettoe of verification).
(0.H. Ferguson's note on this letter was that this should be a Materials respon-sibility and QA would audit the work of Materials).
Aueust 14. 1978 - A handwritten note from D.C. Brown to Don Ferguson also said tut the check of EIS before shipment should be done by Materials and QA should check on Materials to see that it was done. Also questioned if this would cover the mechanical areas and procured items.
. U GENER AL $ ELECTRIC
~
March 19,1982 Page 4 Re: Conditional Releases
- 12. Auoust 11. 1978 - Letter from L.D. Test distributed Engineering Requirements Release Procedure E0P 42-5.00 which included coverage of conditional releases.
On August 14, 1978 John Crepean responded with specific changes particularly relative to the Materials organization's responsibility for initiating Condi-tional Material Releases.
- 13. Auoust 15. 1978 - Letter from D.E. Lee to NEED and' C&! Engineering Section Managers covering NRC inspection unresolved items on Design Record Files either not dated, not signed, etc.
14.
AucuIt 2f.~~lV75 - Letter from D.H. Ferguson to J.W. Mogge (Manager-Materials),
~
prov' ded background information on conditional releases and indicated need for Materials action and decisions on how to implement conditional EI's. No system in Materials. Proposed use of Conditional Material Release. Advised him of possible PRD implications.
- 15. August 30. 1978 - Letter from C.D. Magrath (Engineering Services Operation) to L.M. Dcwnes (Manager-NC&ID.Contro Room Programs) proposed actions for control of conditional releases on farmout programs.
- 16. Se stember 1.1978 - Letter from D.C. Brown to Barrentine, Ferguson, Lee and at ters documenting a Deferred Verification Meeting of 8/20/78. Several desires and limitations itemized relative to EI55ystem.
Different views between Engineering and Materials on acceptability of conditional release EI's, top to bottom level traceability in EIS system and WP55/EIS system interfaces.
Linville (Materials) was to check on how to comply with MED Instruction 70-11 Section C a part of which says " Design verfication shall be completed prior to operational use ------etc."
D. Lee was to make a trial run of an example EI in the WPS$/EIS system. " Engineering Certification" form was attached to this letter.
- 17. Sootember 5.1078 - L.D. Test responded to D.C. Brown on a mark up of the September 1,1Eletter (above) that Engineering Certification would not be needed because EIS would be fixed soon and he indicated by 9/15/78.
18.
Sootember 15. 1978 - Letter from D.C. Brown documenting meeting held 9/14/78 several attendees from 10th Street, Engineering, Materials, QA. Reported on results of Grand Gulf search, problems with uncleared items being elevated to highest assembly, transfer of information fromWPPS to EIS. Dawley advised that WPPS was to be incorporated into Els by FW 7838. Lou Test was to write a CAID Practice and Procedure and Gerry Ross has documented a proposed farmount system.
19.
Decombor 18. 1978 - Letter from Nick Lamberti to QCEP Supervisors (by name) ass' gn' ng responsibility to R. Sullivan for initiating batch process list from EIS (until formal procedures are issued).
l l
0
\\
_7
,f
~ '
.M
'sfNERAL $ ELECTRIC
. pn 19,.1982 ese 5
+
Conditional Releases,
)
.e:
)
i 20.
December 20. 1978, - Letter from E.M. Duke to QA Subsection and Materials Subsection Managers transmits QA Notice 78N-006 " Design Verification Control 4
of MPL Items" meeting scheduled same day.
l 21.
February 12. 1979 - Letter from 8.F. Fleischman to E.D. Linville documents agreements on responsibility of meeting held 2/6/79 as follows:
(a) QA covers Limerick 2 Susquehanna 2 Grand Gulf 2.
-(b) Materials accepts responsibility to obtain evidence from Engineering that verification is complete prior to release for shipment.
(c) (afirTa'1s to obtain Engineering signature on OTs.
(d) QA will perform 10f, audit of design verification for all projects after Grand Gulf 2.
)
22.
February 15. 1979 - Letter from D.A. Arnold documents agreements with Stone-braker and Barnard on design verification on spare and renewal parts.
Letter from John Barnard of March 7,1979 interprets training requirements for non i
QA personnel performing quality checking work.
- 23. March 15,1979 - Letter from D.C. Brown to J.Mogge requested that Materials put in place the procedures to implement the decisions of the Fleischman/Linville 2/6/79 meeting.
Follow up notes show>that as of 5/1/79 nothing had been done by Materials.
l
- 24. March 27.1979 - Letter from John Barnard to D.H. Ferguson provides interpre-tatJon of 70-11 requirements for design verification prior to shippin 1
l 1evel of products requiring verification (piece part, assembly, etc.)g and the t
i i.
- 25. Aucult 4,1980 - Letter from 8.J. Beach to W.M. Barrentine (referencing PRC l
80-3 ) provides results of investigation of errors in Engineering / Drafting i
relative to ICER codes. Problem is not unique to one situation. Eleven j
other similar cases. ' Recommends corrective action in PDE by use of DVSCM and checks at shipping release of parts list.
f i
- 26. Aum ut 8.1980 - Letter from W.M. Barrentine to D.F. Long (referencing PRC 80-E).
W.M. Barrentine considers 8.J. Beach letter of August 4,1980 as i
unacceptable. Appoints Marklein to work with D.E. Lee.
In the event it i
cannot be solved then Barrentine and Long should work it.
Intent is to j
identify and track conditional released equipment.
L
- 27. Avaust 12. 1980 - Letter from Barrentine to Marklein identifies conflicting
]
manner in which members of D.F. Long are handling conditional releases and i
j instructs Marklein to determine corrective action, conceive a system, give directions to D.E. Lee, formalize results and give a plan and schedule to Barrentine no later than August 19, 1980.
1 i
g 4
-,,,m.
-r
-we--r--w
-m
-r
.+,.m.
6--w w ev e-
/
'" g'sER AL h ELECTRIC I
21,1982
),6 p.
nditional Releases Letter from P.M. Briggs to D.H. Ferguson on P&QA0 CAR September 22. 1980 -
- P8005-6 and J. Wilson's proposed conditional release shipment control system.
28.
He concluded that:
(a) Total scope of past items unknown.
p((b) Projects has no tracking system.c) EIS requires modification before it ca 5
information.
(d) QA and Materials are not in the loop after shipment except for
[
specific FDI/FDDR action.
l M W1 son's system proposes MFAT as integrator for catch up.
t Letter from Parker to Briggs.. Disagrees with Briggs
~
- 29. September 24, 1980 - Obvious difference of opinion between Engineering and
?
calls it " hogwash".
QA.
A note from Ed Duke to D.H. Ferguson about 'QA Notice January 15, 1981 -
and attached coments from Ben Beach on use of FDI, or PQC hold etc.'
30.
Note "z
says that per discussions with D.C. Brown and Hugh Currie that we would mort-Th i
gage an FDI to cover the conditional release.
{
vehicle to the site and to the customer similar to a " ship short,"
9 Letter from Cesar Gamez to D.H. Ferguson documents condi-f November 18, 1981 -
31.
tional releases on LaSalle I and notes lack of El comitment dates.
December 3,1981_ - Letter from Phil Briggs documents decisions and coments of h 13, 1981.- Indicated that PM&C r;g 32.
NC&ID Compliance Review meeting held November k.e should track, Engineering should prepare FDI's and that procedures should be revised.
k December 7,1981 - Letter from W.H. Barrentine to D.H. Ferguson says thatis false.
W the claimed violation of E0P 42-5.00 in C. Gamez letter of 11/18/81 33.
[:
Dates required only "if known".
w-Letter from Gamez to Brown points out that E0P 42-5.00 is December 14. 1981_ -
l g in conflict with itself because it also says an EI schedule is a minimum re-34.
<e quirement.
Letter from D.C. Brown to D.H. Ferguson identified several Q
January 19, 1982 -
problems and actions triggered by LaSalle but which lead to h4, 35.
q ific qualification of general use items.
WU Letter from Gamez to Brown identifies specific action taken p;y
- 36. March 15, 1982 -
Generally all items solved or being worked on.
3 on the January 19th letter.
However, Dave Lee has had the E0P changed to Will require further follow-up. remove the option of providing the date only "if known e 4 t-Q h.
c
?!
y,. c W A.*
~
~
A.
GENER AL $ ELECTRIC
. March 21,1982 Page 7 Re: Conditional Releases Other In addition to the above, I also have on file the following:
(1) On October 23; 1978 a letter from Duncan to Ferguson relative to 10CFR 21 shipments. We returned to a normal mode of operation on that date.
(2) A list of P&QA0 CARS on this general subject from Norman Barclay.
h e
A a
e e
i I
O 1
I e
me e en esmum
' - ' ~ - ' -
- i-+-wa
+. -, -. - - - - - _,, _ _. _
__e
s, DEFERRED VERIFICATIONS R6 solution Efforts While employed in C&ID, I informed my management or each deficiency that I. discovered, and proposed the various resolutions.
No serious corrective action resulted from my -
efforts.
Following are some examples, which are taken directly from my work record.
m O
I f
'*m.
4.
's a.,
+-*e.d i
I l
l t
O 1
O v' v'9' CO r b ae tx s e O f3 G A l Lak A.l Wi\\k do -
l
's bi t. A e m err 44 ; A t w,'4k I
n.
m e
co~
B ok[ Ga e4aln ;
iv A I M L.,
s oull
.l
~
i em T luk dtwLs usiw A L'4 aw Ic.e3 cod', J
O 'lla b ua la cLmo la d l A rdw, -
d ; +u i I c M lk 4 e ! ve Di4'; ea4.
b w.
I Ne4 x 2 Th,I"c"! m,5 m !&. ; d um '.e i
It s cel o t A.,.1 1.,A sa s 6 M'm ! a Wo'A M v-t I. c 1 4 3. L ' 'it w l s r 4.' i f Me -Uev ; s ua ti a is l M c o'w o lb b e I b k b' desR cd d e--
!'i s O N. N#t ! a w 4ka l dd w *i d
- b d i L \\ ! b e ! "C " '
l i
(Rs s.ek b'or A b! Sheg?i'cIll -Poo tl f !
Ityk';ve!ageidda
-i.aikshim c6d :i41.61 U
1 im ea si..m u.a w aaa un i iced l's N' wO eo,c, ' + !J<M41.da cf.d i I
la u' I,1
- A m 'i m s
.L'ilt
- %L In e
! ver i r i 's 4-; b.
\\W4 cn X. e s !?
I' i
i I
i'I f
i l
l i
l
& W 214xb.! A dr s ie,a IA b L % 2._c4 i-Nr.
3 t
l I
i l
I i
L_
f i
l i
l l
i-i b
I I
I l
i i
i i
I l
I i
l e
1 l
i i
I I
.i 1
4 l
(
I i
I i
l l
l l
l l
i l
I l
I t
^
l l
e i
i i
i l'
i I
c e
i t
1 l
l t
l i
l l
l l.
)
t j
(.
l i-l l
t l
j
?
i
- \\N e rk es vY hov--
c.t k Al l o t
l N w.
A. ' h\\'.) $ w _F i
I l
i i
il
'hi d'12 ado ws)A L',+U CMr.,, :Sha' A2 d s
f '-
3-9-st_
iT -f.e d ' fka k u 3 'e sb o. l l w o l-e-Ne usd o f o w' v er',l i e d db eu wiev, h
-!!P ' b o ue v i f v. FSNR'sI Pe_+-h n t r L u '$
we
-ovew M e ma lb, b4Nu
&b $ ' re sD Bv s 'i b l e i
a e 's e e V-Nab k 'i s ' bv, bed hi e d dotuwad l
5 2'$
L L m M, Ai
-LI eJ,onA 2n FS A R oo2Clu I -o v,w _I G-b_.% $ ' S'4 v-a w b a r k v
bels Ika b bbd veis f d'ali ch d24ut J 4-L_, ' d e ri o w de)uw.dwhs' hhi 4-w e ik ' of
' bodfawb 4o us.
un IAb Rpab',Nb kb v-eex ! m',4;b C e o,d r
/'
,w s
l l
+
A J. l.'a 4 0,,l o 4 C \\4 4 m a FS A R s, e4, m i
7.7.l.3.! 1-%8 i l
i i
i 3
Sur csb Fs4 R - o c-4,, _ h. L ! ( R ev n, -l,
i
~
6 I 4 & J
' <-co',, m ' of ' Re c's -r o2 A of 6eY
%J odeL2!.
A Psi sh.
=-
i i
Ae I
5 9 t ' fo!3o l
l 4
j j
l I
i i
I I
a l
l l
t i
i j
i I
i i
i I
i.
i i
l l
l l
l I
I l
1 l
i t
l l _(.
I i
+
+
t i
}
l 6
l 1
I I
l i
i i
i i
i i
. _..j__ _
l i
i 4,.,,
l 4
t I
i l
i l
i l
l i
i l
1 l
I l
i uL,At So,- se.eW srti i
ucem I%1 A f M',12 m m-l i
i lf _
k - IR -Q1 '. m oore s *' ea kpl.
( O *Oc i
i
- h. L S,ri ra k'is,. Pl aAn I
kee ' ve d e Il
--(,
me I
! 14 r L,. ek.c de - Alav N2 %ff bd l e I c.. /, M..
f4 e 3skod a,besN.. e a bo at 'oli 4c h es boR I
I m = %.
.w o
s i avesort i nb A v.d osd ?.b CCobf. ri.
my i
w re k NJk E M e u h', a vs.p k So t
we7.
4 h
a 7 *** J k
~(
2 4
- 1.
D wn Pim P'P_D. sA O C
.s i
TW5t fW 2.
o tila OR,' ip f" u w @ @
b Db E s agon,-4-- P S A p.
iama ' G sWs
- ls i 4
__( )
\\
cob \\,'s les'.. A 2A r s u6 e IR'e s
dt @ M Q 71
'I p 4A I O W%
la I 9 O
@.'T u
', i, I u d *. La moord 's ta \\
! A % b h2$-h a 4. L L,e cu s, -
M34tv,,i i
's -
, T' s, '.
s y g g ', { 43 {
[, %
i i
T heA u Ch1! S2h h
@ x e et li e
' bet C e:=
i 0m i
.,,,, R. " a k,. !.L s~4m T'
- 9. am k,
s e os O
O N'
S I
J i,
i i
E P,O b
E M 8 VI
,th d
S C) 8%
4A E YEY*
(k u i V"O l
i i
i i
t I
tid.) % b h_
@M
\\1 Yb bM -
i.
i i
i l
t t
s s
l j
j i
I i
i i
i i
l l
l 3
i i
i I
i l
i i
i
_,,,, ( )
l l
l l
l l
s, i
e t
e 6
l
}
k I
a
e 4,
T'*
CONTROL & INSTRUMENTATION DEPARTMENT San Jose, California
/
- )
September 1,1981 l
V w
I h
I
%P L
h ke6 I
TO:
George Stramback p
SUBJECT:
Document Status 8
REFERENCES:
- 1) Engineering Documentation Practices Manual.
Section C1, Completion Status Codes, 8-24-79
- 2) NEDE-24563 Engineering Infomation System User's Guide, December 1978 Many of our documents have been issued with deferred verification, and should be used with caution. I suggest that each document, when first used and ocassionally thereafter, be checked with EIS (DI program) for verification status. Please note that the ICER code near the revision block of the document does not indicate verification status. See refer ence 1, copy attached.
The EIS check using the DI program will also show current revision and outstanding ECNs.
For design related work, this is necessary infomation.
Project application and MPL numbers can be obtained from the DA program.
Use of this infomation will enhance the accuracy of our work.
Sam A. Milam III C&I Technical Licensing M/C 432 - Ext. 55151
/dc
l j
l t
j i
a i
i i
l i
i i
{
t I
i i
2 l
1 i-r i
i C.
I l
t I
I l
i Wk br) 44_sweA. lea d_ __i_
i IS2 W M% J i
i l
1 i
4.-
4_...w._,.....
..4 i
i i
i
-g k
lR.eu.& dd_.ian d -91ekafes. _.%-.l E? \\ _ B b _. l. _
l _ h. so n n. e _!_6cI..Gracd _G'1,;_Pect.y. ad
_.b.e.r._ b_u cLG
_.( ',
- to-3.t..e t_
l.
i i
i i
.. _ _ a __. _... _ p _ _
.. _ 4.-
N.
T&
.i 3 MD d..
w3.er&, d ' >s k, 41. si L.
u.ke d o w.
T
i
_... J, __.
b e.,k P C
_._ d.O_C.14. %
___..b......
a^
f f
e IdA Aree.'M L w id
+2 Le ' w W leas +. _. _
L _wid.s ' b L L.W Lyk._hta fse %d _ ___ L..
.___...._..1.
_l.._-.Lu.~Mk.%.febe e4 h & perLc._ma ne 4 d.. '
(
. _. _.. _i.._..
__ _...._. L._._2erio..;_ ecd _ w-t o.A <.w. c_M L. EL w 9 t=.
b.ck...pd.'.Sw<..m :t! : k.'4 ev-i om.
- n g. Pre.ssia_.c.c.so m _ h a e m
- u 4,'
'. zn o
. io I,
CofledAM S.v av_' __C-d_f ha r h xp 6:a vA. d d
,ho. Hwo3 Is A d.o.r. de.v Wa - N o.w.i. J o 2 *) 7dI
.u..
3.M __prees d __i l. h cl.l.h.!h h h.-
-_ __ L _._..:
i i
p
.a.
b
.L.__..i..__..y._.-.__
L..
i
... _.. - _ ~ ~ - -
.--.1_---_--._
- j.._. _ '.
._._ {. _... _ ;..__ -.a. _. _.. _.-
(
a._
.. +
_.1.._
,. = =
.s...
I i
i i
i i
I.
i.
l 8
i i
_q j
..____t.__._.,
l l
l l
l l
g 5
9 l
l I
._. w._. _ i..
_L..__. +
-- t --- - d- -
~
t l
+
i i
-..-_A__m
..-.._.-----.i.______._.._.5-.i_.L-
[ _
a
~
}
t
./._..__,_L._._.l..__._6__'_.....! - -._ 6_
6-._
)
I t
i i
i i
_s.
_-._4.---
.L -.A. -
.__ -..... _ __ -.. 3 3
l i
..s...
t I
l t
l l -
s
___y f
f
,~..
l.
DEFERRED VERIFICATIONS
' Resolution Efforts At one point, my management instructed me to develop a method for using the C&ID NEMS work tracking system to control deferred verifications.
The use of NEMS was to be in lieu of procedures which already existed to control deferred verifications.
My subsequent investigations also revealed that NEMS was not operational, and probably would not be in the foreseeable future.
Following are my instructions and my response, which took the form of a letter to be signed by my
(
1 manager.
k e
30 i.
a
~ - - -
.aV,,
I
/
cc:
R.D. Cameron
^'
e A.G. Carter 8
'GENER AL $ ELECTRIC D.H. Ferguson
. Hendon
(
CONTROL & INSTRUMENTATION. DEPT.
D.
il cuaL:Tv assuRaNet p
. Runtagh J
C.. Skov ~
san Joss.caLePORNIa Thistlethwaite
[g j
.K. Waldman September 4, 1981 p dp>?
'. f C
SUBJECT:
DESIGN ENGI Q
(PQ'I
$Pt k 4 k-l e r
~by' 3
%n G.t. mao &
'f )p
\\
A* CO T * * + si3 TO:
W.M. Barrentine, Manager Production Design Engineeri'ngr b M * ^@ e
- 5 3
Mail Code 431 Ext. 2397
((
N E u S G
'.d e f i e rt - e s / n/ S t,
Oc.+e be n,19 8 i,C t e bee k si o j
Letter on this subject to NC&ID staff from D.H. Ferguson dated 8/18/81.
RETSPENCE:
The Engineering Quality Review Team Members have established the review objectives, review subjects and schedule for this activity. They are as follows:
I.
Review Obiectives Thets are two primary purposed for this review. The first is to investiaate Enqineering related eroblems, primarily those associated The with design changes with sianificant impact on Manufacturing.
second is to review cemeliance within Engineering and directly inter-facing components on the following:
Deferred desian verification Qualification o_f Products and components Dedication of commercial products Documentation and correction of ship short deficiencies de4'iciencies identified in the field _
Correction of crocuct
. Accuracy and adequacy of certification of product quality (OA Section)
Thenon-C&Ipertionofprblemswithsubcontracteddesignswillnot be included in the review, except for the compliance portion.
The plan of the review team is to document status and improvement trend as well as problems. The role of other functions in the problems investigated will be reported when the information is readily available.
i
- v.. -
GENERAL $ ELECTRIC II.
Review Subiects A. The Engineering related problem r_eview will cover such areas as:
ECN's
- E dules.
-Enaineering QC Floor support /ccaanunications
' Standardization Site /customwr support B.
The compliance review will cover primarily the six subjects listed in paragraph I.
III. Schedule Target Date a.
Define scope of review A
5e/T A b.
Prepare review ' heck lists 8136 c
R/T O c.
Keview and finalize b.
8137 e
8139 - $rj/7 J 7 d.
Review kickoff meeting with W. Barrentine, D. Ferguson, Section Reps and Review Team C%I //
i e.
Complete review 8141 f.
Issue draft report for review 8143 OcT Jf and Engineering input of planned corrective action as appropriate
/4t/ 8 g.
Issue final report, with added 8145 Review Team recommendations l
if appropriate h.
Closeout meeting 8145 Ne V I Review team:
1.
P.M Briggs - QA (Leader) 2.
R.B. Cameron - QA 3.
O.R. Erie - SED 4.
C.B. Skov - QA
?
E 5.
Unidentified
[
6.
Unidentified P.M. Briggs Principal QC Engineer Mail Code 242, Ext. 53712 i
i I
.-,---.-------n--------
,--...n
,;g _
CONTROL & INSTRUENTATION DEPARTMENT San Jose, California Tk.sneue-,;H.* h
~
cc: Sam A. Milam III c.
October 13, 1981 S e e 1.o-lc, Gu u s Am, c> /n /s r p
( ', t e d us e e b pao 3 T0:
Component 913 Engineers
SUBJECT:
NEMS Guide' lines - 10/13/81
REFERENCES:
1.
E0P 42-6.00 - Independent Design Verification, 4/30/81 2.
The Wonderful World of NEMS (uniss0ed, copy attached) 3.
NEMS PD Planning Sheet (copy attached)
-}
Purpose 1.
Make a visible record of each deferred verification.
2.
Designate responsibility for cloiure of each deferred verification.
~
3.
Indicate expected date of closure of each deferred verification.
4.
Provjde periodic reminder for the engineer who is responsible for closing the deferred verification.
NOTE: NEMS schedule completion does not constitute an auditable record of deferred verification closure. See EOP 42-6.00, paragraph 4.1.2d and 4.1.2e. When performing a deferred verification, compliance with E0P 42-6.00, paragraph 4.1.2 is required. This is in addition to these guidelines.
Guidelines NOTE: These guidelines are in effect while the word processor NEMS is in use. When we begin using the computer NEMS, a new guideline or procedure will be used. An example of a completed NEMS PD Planning Sheet is attached.
1.
Make a NEMS record for each deferred verification by completing NEMS PD Planning Sheets (reference 3J Yn accordance with Reference 2.
2.
Submit sheet to either A. Koslow or G.B. Stramback.
- s. B. Str mback, Manager Component 913 GBS: bit
~ DEPERRED VERIFICATIONS t
Resolution Errorts t
To compensate for the lack of management interest in deferred verification problems, I tried to use the Productivity Improvement Proposal system to obtain corrective action.
I used this approach because responses were required to all inputs to the system.
Thus, I could not be ignored.
Following is the record or my errort to use the Productivity Improvement Proposal system to 1.
provide traceability to and retrievability or the DVSCN, and to 2.
insure adequate verification prior to the use of a DVSCN for the removal of a record of deferred verification.
The suggestions were rejected, as shown on the page rollowing the suggestions.
I d l
l l
l i
34 p
GENE AAL $ ELECTRIC NUCLEAR CONTROL AND INSTRUMENTATION DEPARTMENT c (".;
PRODOCTIVITY IMPROVEMENT PROPOSAL ALL AREAS MUST BE COMPLETED BY PROPOSER EMP PAY NO.
(DF NO. EMPLOYEE NAME BLDG ROOM EXT I G 2 0 4 9 I 3 S A m h
M 1 L h h I
s 1
A L k t 3 t T 55 ( 6 I YOUR JOB TITLE PROPOSAL TITLE E N G \\ Al E E R D E P 5 R R E D V S R I (= l C A T I 0 6 WHO SHOULD EVALUATE YOUR PROPOSALtCHECK ONE)
O FAB O MECH O PANEL ELECT ' O PANEL NON-E O PGCC O FARM OUT O OTHER BUY SCRIBE,YOUR PRI SAL i
v4Cet 'som $p Cor 2nd bcu w1 e nk C..Ofkre o he e T re C i veMic atio., red.be,4s,, w s c N 's b v issw W aH 2 Jd%iew 1 internal shed b the C-cN.wsb %) sam Eul kum b er-Back Sr.
d The e w, red udC muws a lema rea nL
& C m w-b, aea1,telDes'iew Ve AficabS5 abs dia meh obter (ovsed 6 cuf6 closare of deferd ver@c 2.bw.Siwcc DVsc N's are issued wi% no homber. thev are va e_Fechelv v el-yei valol#. 'The su4 eske3 wend toou lcl supolv c[Oru re cOwfi r w a Mo n avko kically whew he E-CN wa ordere d Em b o. 'id roow beca use tke a ddh'iawa l inh rnal sLeed (pou (
be 2thcLJ ko de &cM.
No search veut d Ne vece ss1rv.
YOUR SIGNATURE (S) p-p.gl p,
g // -g Sm A. f4 tb Tr-Se A.NJ5 J,4 n F. L ea4 v' EVALUATORS
- RECOMMENDATIONS AF REJECTED,NAME OF PERSON WHO MADE ACTUAL DECISION O ACCEPT C REJECT REASON FOR REJECTION - SHOULD BE A COMPLETE AND DETAILED STATEMENT SUITABLE FOR INCORPO.
RATION IN A LETTER DOCUMENTING THE NON-ADOPTION OF THE PROPOSAL. IF PREVIOUS CONSIDERATION HAS BEEN GIVEN TO THJS IDEA, INCLUDE REFERENCE TO SPECIFIC CORRESPONDENCE, DRAWINGS, SHOP ORDERS, ETC.
Se2 e Ret. S u A. M,Ia_ m -b A tces r~
9d A.o ak \\ I4..
k 1)w.
,e2h,~
Ra..,,11.
i M a ve t, R. t 9 s2 f.h &
eo-r k 9 2.u
^
,g
@ N O ^
5n RETAINED BY ORIGINATOR
_u
- 5. -
~
GENERAL ELECTRIC NUCLEAR CONTROL AND INSTRUMENTATION DEPARTMENT
[t PRODUCTIVITY IMPROVEMENT PROPOSAL ALL AREAS MUST BE COMPLETED BY PROPOSER
'EMP PAY NO.
OJW NO. EMPLOYEE NAME BLDG ROOM EXT l
4 1 3 7 'l A
O M tA 6 9
L. 't N
H r3 i
&r E R
4.
/M
/ 4 I
O 5 Z. S f.T7 s z. o 4 9 3 s A A A
A i
c 4 p i
g i
A
- t. M i 3 1 s s i s ij_
YOUR JOB TITLE PROPOSAL TITLE A N A t
sf l'
W L M g E N &
I N & & R D t-S I
G-N N & R
( F R &
V I
~
- WHO SHOULD EVALUATE YOUR PROPOSAL (CHECK ONE)
O FAB O MECH O PANEL ELECT O PANEL NON.E O PGCC O FARM OUT O OTHER BUY DESCRIBE YOUR PROPOSAL
(.5wiered h, sug3esh *wn o ve/4; cab ' 9-it-e # 3 s
For add %2( *idemal Aed ( oev oApwa( wgwedow)ure
% A-J',ed DV st M ; c m ath eke d. Ada.b+ t i. b Vic N it alv n k
- deded b chna e vedifica41ow r' tabs 2.vv scN ca w be wreM for b.h 1
- avs d a ecr4't. 3. ^% 1 cL29 c b GC)P. 4. N o S e u l l o e u - e d
's s isc ued - Dvsc AJ 3sts wmbar a t, ore A o u.s esA or scv a, A
,s -il.J in q>2 A;c.s mi n & o,.',ii a l l"(
A u g +.A - u usil,. r. Fo ved-fb ai t es. d d q 1[st o der Dvsc A) skeet,ut eh,4 Ecv. 6. Aud; bbl #,
fru s 2 LL, record
,t cleared deferect ver.',-f ca-l tod,
Nd
, kn\\ ns r-o P cha ues. Gad l*e im(moded bbh' OV SA. utz % AgamE r~
y YOUM SIGNATURE (S) n-un EVALUATORS RECOMMENDATIONS IF REJECTED, NAME OF PERSON WHO MADE ACTUAL DECISION O ACCEPT O REJECT REASON FOR REJECTION - SHOULD BE A COMPLETE AND DETAILED STATEMENT SulTABLE FOR INCORPO-RATION IN A LETTER DOCUMENTING THE NON. ADOPTION OF THE PROPOSAL IF PREVIOUS CONSIDERATION HAS BEEN GIVEN TO THIS IDEA, INCLUDE REFERENCE TO SPECIFIC CORRESPONDENCE, DRAWINGS, SHOP 3,e 1o g,
4 g
nt-b A, ke Am _
R ERS, m RMuM:-k.
eF de h a % z w as b2veh P3 t 9 B'1. he { c d r o c> k-9 7 1(
I l
..J
\\
l t
U ~~ assac so won t.
9mm.
F._...
RETAINED 8Y ORIGINATOR
.--,,,,,...---,--,,.n
DESIGNVERIFICATIONSTATUSCHANGENO REFERENCE DRF NO
(
FR0ft:
COPP NO:
DATE MAIL CODE 724 ADDITIONAL INDEPENDENT VERIFICATION OF DESIGNS DELINEATED BY THE LISTED DOCUMENTS IS REQUIRED AND WILL BE COMPLETED BY FW SECTION MANAGER APPROVAL ALL RECORDS SHOWING VERIFIED STATUS OF THESE ITEMS SHOULD BE CHANGED TO " UNVERIFIED" INDEPENDENT VERIFICATION OF DESIGNS DELINEATED BY THE LISTED DOCUMENTS HAS BEEN COMPLETED. ALL RECORDS SHOWING " UNVERIFIED" STATUS OF THESE ITEMS SHOULD NOW BE
' CHANGED ACCORDINGLY.
VER ON D MENTS hlN DOCUMENT TITLE DOCUMENT IDENT NO.
3U 1
~
('
/ ( i C
[
i O
$.w{\\I l
l l
l l
(RESPONSIBLE DESIGN ENGINEER SIGNATURE)
DATE l
DISTRIBUTION:
i
m::a p;.,:.W.co.-
g;
=Lk.7m,gg;N DESIGN VERIFICATION STATUS CHANGE NOTICE
.-- h cm.atA w wi.i.
Ext M/C ERM,ECN No.
DATE l Comp Sheet No.
V, of ISSUED DATE I
MPL NO.
YERIFICATION DOCUMENTS DOCUMENT IDENT NO.
DOCUMENT TITLE OR SUB.
(RECORDS.ETC)
MOO 5 Fo m VERIFICATION COMMENTS RESOLUTION I
Responsible Engineer,Date VERIFICATION STATEMENT c
D 0
VERIFIED BY DATE INDEPENDENT VERIFICATION OF DESIGt:5 DELINEATED BY THE LISTED DOCUMENTS HAS BEEN COMPLETED. ALL RECORDS SHOWING " UNVERIFIED" STATUS OF THESE ITEMS SHOULD NOW BE CHANGED ACCORDINGLY.
Responsible Engineer Date I
'Responsibte Manager, Comp,Date l
Lead System Engineer, Comp,Date DISTRIBUTION:
(
Change Control Endorsement 6 Date j
Internal Sheet (Not to be Distributed Externally)
.s
mw:
s sammg;rg DESIGNVERIFICATIONSTATUSCHANGENOTIC$
I c14lI4; r
continuation sheet
~
]; ___
_ _.s
~
Ext H/C EPJi,ECN No.
Comp Date ISSUED DATE Sheet No.
V Of MPL NO.
VERIFICATION DOCUMENTS DOCUMENT IDENT NO.
DOCUMENT TITLE OR SUB.
(RECORDS,ETC)
OW 00.5 E oA e
i k
Internal Sheet (Not to be distributed Externally)
~
W,Jo Q *g' g GENERAL h ELECTRig NUCLEAR CONTROL AND INSTRUMENTATION DEPARTMENT
% M !,
C PRODUCTIVITY IMPROVEMENT PROPOSAL I
ALL AREAS MUST BE COMPLETED BY PROPOSER BLOG ROOM EXT
{
EMP PAY NO.
(D# NO. EMPLOYEE NAME l
4
)
3
'l --l A U M t%
t%
1 L. 't N
H 8
e c, e g
- 4. fn s 4 u
S z a u 7 I
- t. 2. o Em 9 I 3 S A h A
N
\\
L A.e I
t l
A L.M l
3 1
- 1 5 5 I
5 1
YOUR JOB TITLE PROPOSAL TITLE A N A 4
st s r P
t.
A o G N S i
N & & R O
t-5 l
Cr N V E R i F R F V
I WHO SHOULO EVALUATE YOUR PROPOSAL (CHECK ONE)
O FA8 O MECH O PANEL ELECT C PANEL NON E D PGCC D FARM OUT Q OTHER BUY D SCRIBE YOUR PROPOSAL wo#lemeek h Ev44eiYiow De f',e n \\/a e'd i c a k l ow ' 9-It S i N. M, b l,d evwa\\ she d ( oev-orsd.2l wg,m b y are l
ve,A,hed Dv sen ;c a Huke l. A=b,a. h p e I. MSc N 'i s alm il 7
' d. 4d b ekna e vei.hea413w riaius 7.vvicN es., ke ure d 3
4 i
for b.h s RVs u d EcN's. 3. /m L., ) cha e t b EoP. 4, NJ i
Ao<o-ed
,s
'ssu.d - Dvsen ads E,4ev.of omiu.s i
li nA.c ecN 4, A
,s J 1 J L a h A ;[r u,', n & o bg; u l i
A.,
oA - u u,M e. s. Fo. ver; h d 6 L,-l. lust o der ov s e AJ s h,,t, mf r.N Etv fo. Ava bbl #,
~
i record of C,h3rPh d
Grecl V f r's b C2 Y ' oln,
Tr2r # 2 41' So s, \\ vesF<> P e L a a. o s. w a s b Ier is, elm edec Nd e ;
bbD.
oV i
YOUR SIGNATURE (S) 5 Aga m,Ir
,,/
e
(
id-4 -5'/
[
EVALUATOR $* RECOMMENDATIONS I
E CTECf, NAME OF PERSC N WHf MADE ACTUAL DECISION O ACCEPT X RE;EcT (1,g y M g_
REASON FOR REJECTION - SHOULD BE A COMPLETE AND DETAILED STATEMENT SUIT RATION IN A LETTER DOCUMENTING THE NON-ADOPTION OF THE PROPOSAL IF PRE HOP HAS BEEN GIVEN TO THIS lOEA, INCLUDE REFERENCE TO SPECIFIC CORRESPONDENCE, ORAWIN hLL'.%.n O r ba. LoobabY wDr%sA 6 w..$k l
a$Lf L ?.}16 bhieu u.C cs-.L
. $ [ tb EoMd2/
w.I L bvSD E c L l $
b,.eb. ',
$ J'.<>w te..$.-.*
\\
\\d del -
A -,, } A
~ _8 n s:L :.i
~
l~o. L.: 40sa.
A JL d.o L ud.1,J uss ~L J e L N.J
~
/
/
waso es Wan
DEFERRED VERIFICATIONS Resolution Errorts While I was involved in the attempt to resolve DVSCN i ~i defic enc es, I also tr ei d to issue a deferred verification using the DVSCN in accordance with the procedures.
My document issue package contained the reviewed check print, the ERM and the DVSCN.
All anticipated technical review of the check print was complete.
The reason for the deferred verification was an unverified source document.
The document issue package was rejected back to me and my immediate manager with instructions to 1.
issue.the document without,a DVSCN, and 2.
use a Design Record File '(DRF).
(Whether or not to use a DRF is a related issue which I have tried not to address in this report.)
The following notes and letters show the situation which then developed.
e l
i 4.1 l
(~
FR0!1: bawsA Maa tE COMP NO: 9G DATE l-i n -s t MAIL 40DE 724 7 ADDITIONAL INDEPENDENT VERIFICATION OF DESIGNS DELIX5ATED BY THE LISTED DOCUMENTS IS REQUIRED AND WILL BE COMPLETED BY FW 8113
/
SECTION MANAGER APPROVA1Y
/
ALL RECORDS SHOWING VERIFIED STATUS OF THESE ' ITEMS HOULD BE CHANGED TO " UNVERIFIED" INDEPENDENT VERIFICATION OF DESIGNS DELINEATED BY THE LISTED DOCUMENTS HAS BEEN COMPLETED. ALL RECORDS SHOWING "UNVERI ED" STATUS OF THESE ITEMS SHOULD NOW BE 1
CHANGED ACCORDINGLY.
\\
VR D
MENTS
$l 00f0MENTTITLE DOCUMENT IDENT NO.
3 8%E3c4 BA B33 -:oa c Re b rRei, rtutalb ERM AML-2 997 y s ke n m
/
f O
f O
W k
i h/
9 V
\\Q N
N s-W Y
&y
\\x
[.
y f4 2
/
C 3
arm 2-tu -s2
(%SPONSIBLEDESIGNENGINEERSIGNATURE)
DATE I 3 o A, 932. A, 69 5 A, M A, 4 31B F DISTRIBUTION:
PR, t
Cn.n?Q (4/Ani
It e
J w
/
f
'ai I
+
l ui A. A s t.,
l 3-l -8 2.
I 3
s
~
j.T* *..R. L. ReeM % ;_...r-
.i...
cahom Tiajus Ch
- e. NaW e..CDVscN,)
..__..(
._ _...[u b lef.i!. Det'i3n.Ver'i 3
'he. mNr.ke.1. DVSch(.h web redusdut,25 fo w....
4.1.'2. b,ju.'s ce d..bcopy.tha(ke.M., Bee sus t d a4ed...Ih
'is G o P 8ll-L.o a re y
pa ragraph h
yo u r-rem mac Q.,.1.e t.o w de N...._.
s
.. o
.bVstN evec 2.g a'i g.,
Iw
-Ku.
Mm, _ _
.. f e ts c. vNik e your.. ed'etorial.. cam % fs. ow l
. 3. sepa sk.
she e.+, e v-rea d. tk pro c ede w re__....
r
.c.a rch t y befo.e mac M 3 v. q.w.e k..
...._}
g,W 44 k
I
)
hii i i
1
- 9..
i k~.
Wo.f_
e.c.5..O f' 0 7"
- E@
b_1 l.
i S.F. w._f L._ M 'i h e '
I i.
J el. eve w t.
I Ale e__bw,,_b A
$b ~ IC. l.e..
AL.3 egb;S,__Dn',p Nef, bc ad m_. 3 b4 e s.
____ _ :.Ckm e No be e._(.D v sc 4., Et -92., bled.g,fsvo_
l..H.e <._ks.t.S a e A M l >
.r...+.....
z.
IL_Ges.1om 5 R M J\\mi..- t 99'l.. G r od GA.
._ t fc.r m 3 3
- 2 2.., 0.l.d.we h so.o...
3.._..le &.v.._d r._ _S.=w..._A _. M._.I= - c
- 4. o..._
. _ ___A.1 1.Is->, _.v _ s.s h'y d.. s.ks
.,, _ Ma vr k 4, I c)s t
. _(..-...
_.._ fit 4_ w,L_sa:=
._._ C 4 4 kev _csfe m.o.. 4.e.to s ) _
pv-cedows,_
._-__I.__a.w..w. l v e d..h..a S i p t..ver.
.. _. r. 'ms',d b i. A. D.9 5 c N
,3. <e p ve. J :.w
-._ _aldil..,.1,. O. ERM..I.
6 slsst _i-bi. a.
.....___D R F.. -e f er evtc.< _ 3 s NL.q he d __ov.W..
._...._..ESM.__,@.g.foid;e,33., cog (srme d. loy.
' ~
Lel2.w.LA\\.1.,_& b_.f a ic.n s.e.. _a vl A Nr e j,
y
_=
_.._.thm I. uke d.._f'r.awk. 6a s goc-v's, k, sak.1
_.kt AW.'.t.-.W.,. R. L V.eep% _a
(-
blocV. q._ & _Ssw.<_ef.. % _D\\iSCN..ad
_Ws.e*tm. ik._DR F.1 der e> m. L_Va v-e e
. M _ g 4 _._. b e p w.._ 4. _ S g u,__ __... _ _.
t -
S k t f.t A.L t 3.._ {. t,.a v k's.m v_t b.
\\
4._.LeRet,_ s a.s A. R.\\w s. J.
A.v 3i._,
fiarcL._S.3.9d.I \\1e r'. he a.4.h.3.e.a <-4 1etr iev.b \\. i J
..C.l e d _.wed. _92..n.
I
_..__._.L
_.I4em l..o e.eb 92ii __.._.
L.$1
- 3...wM t.h.. $ ll a.
i
.u...._._..._
. _...... - ~......
L.,
i
' W o c k. _.re.c-o rd _cfor..k cek _Stn 3as h. lAlb.%.h i
_Lt._.._fde.rcv..s.._
_. (.. __ _ -
._.t 4.em _1 __w.4_e z. i o t
e
=.
_ ~..... _. _
.I.r.e b n.ese.l.& R M %...t W i fr o
..-4 W
...ss s.q ___.c. y cA e..., ce d 'i d....' 4. Av2 _..
.vc 54h wu.N ed.
.*Y.br..33YFf M.Me...
.. S T C3.w h k M.rt....b if....W 33 _. M )s wg.e d..
y. + k.2 Ad b}i.w, f.a..
D R F, w w k er..
.b
.o
. _ _.. _ _ _. I... _ + = d A.. P-oS l. ~..._W.&.2 _w
- ! ct
_. __ a o 4.._. g.# t_ _D R F_ wdher s _.o.o.s d _..._.
._ CR M ' s._, _I.E _so c % e.b e ? s. 3. i.y _....
1.
.__.. t =.. 2 r b'. i_o.v i I y r: gu' *e 2 M F.....
~
v.h t i _. he u.
b a d d....
.-.. _ _vm wtb es,. b3
.._i3.
W.e m_s. elves.
.I e15...w4ev) h..
. rep..r4
.. %..p ea el.c,
.b i.'m..
-_. 2 p p v.e di d e.... p
- o e t e_ a. & __ I o ?_"..;-b-a ei.
3 ~ 8 ~B ~t
__.....__. T.b._.S e e. w d. D v i e. ru. h a s.. dh a prea r.e d..
......Tke Duse At _1.s.. rey'. re.d. lay._E-oP 9 4-6 o o 4 d.2 b... T.aga'in ha va_. t Q
..b..._ _.- __ __.... ga o g ri p ke R M... ;n w d
. I...de i t. m a +.
Mbe M.
_L wi., \\.
.t Le.. D.v s c. n
'i s-a b ->cJ.b y
.___hg 2, wg e.we.vd.. I._ La w.. b s.tu.n e)
.Ms sgu. m. A..ev.ea.f s._ Cv a rwuh,. M.n l
._. -._._.s.. _. % _ F ra r e. s e
... _z _.Fr w.. Gas va.. e.. -._
._.._. _. _.. __ __. _..S. _..i..L.e % J.B. (e o
[._.
. -. -. _ _L - S r.di e h ev t
- r _.._......
_.._.. _ _. 5.._._ A r 4.s e.. k. o s t o o.._. _..
6-___. T3 y M.u<<a3........_._.
l
. _.._ _.....__. _-.._3L na.. s% ers..
._ T it-e:n...
- ,+
l i
i l
i i
I t
9 i
I Wo r recerd t o p p k 9!,2,l'/
i r o r-
' Su A '. M', a v Tn-I i beh l
L )ee b @ P., lo E
'km Ov e w te i
i i
i f',ianiti, ao&
L 3 -r e-e 2 1._
~
hvSC N c '
w.e d r ' J Iej
' 4-L, <,
V. A \\ u 4-$
E-R M
\\m wu e
E!Io em lo'e v o M a w d 9 e fo s 'e h b 'v-elrac,- ; V ow4',t R nhcm was D ern ++ed I
E h31 4o s h e o I-fko O R E: vn/wloor om r~-P M. ' u A-T.
~ nk-e di s cla'i m E Jm skee+
1.
1
(
i h
'i t
8 R
l i
I e
l l
t i
\\
d I
h
[
t r
e -
...d.
d'j;{Nfh'fj7,%3 DESIGN VERIFICATION STATUS CHANGE NOTICE REFERENCE DRF NO 653-80 T45' P w-re n@mm r FROM: Sm A. M. tam v To: PLANT DEFINITION !. RELEASE CONTROL UNIT COMP NO: 9t3 DATE 2 -tu-82 MAIL CODE 724
]
ADDITIONAL INCEPENDENT VERIFICATION OF DESIGNS DELINEATED BY,THE LISTED DOCUMEh75 IS REQUIRED AND WILL BE COMPLETED BY FW 87 i $. /)
~
SECTION FANAGER APPROVALM[/l//2Y/1/0
//[
ALL RECORDS SHOWING VERIFIED STATUS OF THESE IT D BE' NIA5GED TO " UNVERIFIED" INDEPENDENT VERIFICATION OF DESIGNS DELINEATED llY THE LISTED DOCUMENTS HAS BEEN COMPLETED. ALL RECORDS SHOWING " UNVERIFIED" STATUS OF THESE ITEMS SHOULD NOW BE CHANGED ACCORDINGLY.
VER D
MENTS DOCUMENT IDEN1 NO.
DOCUMENT TITLE RS 8W.E3ott B A Un-s olo Rea dor-Rec *i, mb b.,
ERM AML-Z331 S sle%
g I
Es,A k W 2-24-8Z (RESPONSIBLEDESIGNENGINEERSIGNATURE)
DATE DISTRIBtJTION: PR, 43og, q 37. A, 4 3 5 A, ~5 6 6 A, u S t 3 F e
-g g
e=ww me a
'r.,
DEPERRED VERIFICATIONS Resolution Efforts The following letters and the note from my personal, work record represent the end of my efforts while employed at GE to resolve the deferred verification problems.
e D
4 0
e
.e t
J
I' O,.
5...
CONTROL & INSTRUltENTATION DEPARTMENT San Jose, California,
$ce
, tem I
w c e k.
BLIO March 8,1982 4
(
,,4 g, t 3 3 i
To:
A. Koslow
SUBJECT:
Retrievability of Verification Records i
REFERENCES:
1.
Productivity Improvement Proposal, Deferred Verification, Sam A. Milam III and John F. Leahey, 9-11-81.
2.
Productivity Improvement Proposal.
4 Design Verif Rev 1 Sam A. Milam III i
and Marilyn Haiges,10-6-81.
3.
Response to Reference 2 Charles W.
Hart, not dated.
9 4.
Design Verification Status Change Notice (DVSCN), ERM AML-2997, Sam A. Milam III, 2-24-82.
My proposal to establish retrievability.of deferred verification closure has been disapproved in refer-ence 3.
The basis of the decision is that the use of the DVSCN, as defined by the E0P, is adequate.
Concurrently, my efforts to use the DVSCN in accor-dance with the E0P have been opposed. See reference 4
The basis of the opposition is that the DVSCN is redundant and not necessary.
l These two positions, existing simultaneously within CSI management are in conflict. I have attached
-continued-I f
}
i
,w A. Koslow Ma rc h 8,.1982 Page copies of the referenced documents for your infor-mation.
Please reso-1ve this conflict so that we can establish traceability for our deferred verifi-cations and retrievability for their closure.
A. h2 h
Sam A. Milam III C&I Technical Licensing SAM /pjw ATTACHMENT P
Y h-f i
]
e 4
P i
.--J.
s.-_.
a L
',u : _.
.. =.
.~
d O
N.No.r \\c. recor b
.hr u.see k -. 8 2.13
' S3 w. 8 - Md.h. I!r... _
..O...._. _.. J.. _ Re i ev e n c. t.
__. _ -.. _. -._Lt.M erfro ~,..b A : P4'. la-ut. b A.%s to u '
l
=.....__
.. _......_ R e t.r-i ev alo. lM
.o f V.e r'. fica f i om Re cor4s,
y htavcLi 8,i992.
_ k al k.h.
o.
b rnie. kpencer a hd.
1 Wp r"O V e >MEM iQm o
. VM.
r Od4C h
- v
- 4 3
..Y PhC epo$3 )
o vt. d g_(cyr+.d ytyN*tc3i'sotti,
. ).\\ t -
-....c_... _ _. _.... E u 3$ @ S-kf. d Od'l
'si I.
W't3 h. b.cou ItM 4 e
. _ _ _.._My. fu rIw I h o k OC 't M u. t, 1.SNMd
. C6 a Y 3 C.5,.._ fyJ Y k. C-AS p o fu d 't C.. Ne...coacvrreb tha f
.T.,
produ.c e
._..dtb My 5u$ $ e Si'i o w
. _.... 2lth. EOh. ma v--ky (0v. F -a w k.. H e se em ed
.. o(>bvN d i C.. Na I 1..Chld AC 'seVe Of
.....chaq e I%
d4 ey-2, d sMe 4..%2 &
I do,
~
. 3 oh
.v-N r
[e.e( 3 N
3 awe oay C-e S { ow 53 c)
' }..
re i PVid I y
$e e
i e h3 v4. k
)relt 4r C 3.5 br'.k. 60 P. _.
h._ f < t markup..Ite.
mstr e c ke d
.(. __.... _. _t k.. w o r k.
.ve,ry.. low.prio.ri1,
9 3 ' O - 87.
ap 4
i e
e.
.=
e g
D
..e.
...u.
g.
l W'Q h_-
4...S
'.eq e6 i
1 1
i er
-.g-.m-,,. ~, -., -, -_ --_..- --
-...m--...9
,,.,ym,-y
--,m_
m.-,,,+
9
.--e.--y
.-py..
~ 5$
6* **..i STRICTLY PRIVATE NUCLEAR CONTROL AND INSTRUMENTATION DEPARTMENT San' Jose, California up ; > '
A s
April 1, 1982 e
s
Dear Mr. Nilan,
y i
I regret to inform you that as of April 30, 1982, there no longer vill be work available for you within the Safety and Licensing Unit.
Unless before that date you secure a position els6where in the Operations or Company, you will be placed on a lack-of work status. This situation exists as a result'of current business conditions.
Professional Resources will assist you 'in ascertaining whether there are other available positions elsewhere in the. Operations or ~ other General Electric
. components which can utilize your experience and abilities. ~ I sugges.c that as 7
a first step you contact the Manager-Professional Resources, Extension 53610, d
who will continue to seek possible placement opportunities through contacts available to me.
I also encourage you to pursue, whatever leads you cray be able g
to develop including, if you wish, contacts outside the Company.
I hope our combined efforts will assist you in locating a rewarding position which 'ill utilize fully your capabilities.
w Skneerely, l
kN:
d 3
D.W. Reigel, Manager s
s Systems Engineering e
e w
3
.i 4
,_ 77 i1 4*
~g
'7 c
)
\\
c+
-2
^ t
{
l
' ~
STRICTLY PRIVATE i_
s 9
y
,C
.L
! DEFERRED VERIFICATIONS Conclusions I am forced to conclude that C&ID management -has no interest in resolving the. deficiencies in the control of deferred verifications.
Indeed, I speculate that the existance of the various problems has made possible the justification of the resources committed to their solution, and that the continued lack of any solutions will justify the continued commitment of these resources.
e e
6 sep i..
I.
l 53
+4.e, u-a o.
DEFERRED VERIFICATIONS Rec'ommendations-
. The solution of the deferred verification problem' falls neatly into two parts:
1.
completion of verifications which have been previously deferred, and J
2.
resolution of deficiencies'in the control of deferred verifications.
The completion of verifications that have previously been deferred may not be possible.
Merely recovering the record of forgotten deferred verifications will be a tedious task, if not a monumental one.
The completion of the deferred verifications once they are brought to light will require information which,
~ in.many cases, will no longer be available.
Nevertheless, I recommend that the effort be made.
There are two approaches to the resolution of deficiencies
.n the control of deferred verifications.
One approach is to i
make-the sorts of changes that I have discussed in this report.
Experience, however, forces me to doubt the value of this approach.
I feel that the only reliable approach is to simply not allow verifications to be deferred.
This would prevent the deficiencies, avoiding the need to resolve them, and is my final recommendation on the subject.
i -
54
- s. !;
~..
~
DEFERRED VERIFICATIONS References 1.
E0P 42-6.00, Independent Design Verification, General Electrie Company 3.
Engineering Documentation Practices Manual,. number unknown,
. General Electric Company 4
NEDE - 24563, Engineering Information System User's Guide, General Electric Company 5
E0P 30-4 00, Engineering Information System, General Electric Company-6.
Personal Work Record, Sam A. Milam III, Nuclear Engineer O
55 l
c
g.:
DEFERRED VERIFICATIONS Appendix Fiscal Calanders 4
d 56
- 4..
I
.i 1980
' FISCAL CALENDAR 1980-MO M
T W,,
T F
S S
WK MO M
T W
T F
S S
WK FIRST QUARTER THIRD QUARTER 1
2 3
4
'.i t
i 30 1
2 3
4 e 27 JAN 7
8 9 10 11 2
Jul 7
8 9 10 11
'.'c 10 28
-)
5 14 15 16 17 18
'n
,.c a
s 14 15 16 17 18
'; 'J a 29 WKs 21 22 23 24 25 4
WKs 21 22 23 24 25 7
30 28 29 30 31 1
5 28 29 30 31 1
si 4
5 6
7 8
o 6
4 5
6 7
8
' 10 32 Aus 11 12 13 14 15 7
11 12 13 14 15 1-33 4
4 18 19 20 21 22
..s 8
18 19 M T M N
34 Wxs Wxs 25 26 27 28 29 9
25 26 27 28 29 3:
as MAR 3
4 5
6 7
10 SEP 1
2 3
4 5
7 36 4
10 11 12 13 14
'.a 11 4
8 9 10 11 12 i il 37 17 18 19 20 21 12 15 16 17 18 19
.~.0 9'
38
~~
wxs wxs 24 25 26 27 28 :'.
is 22 23 24 25 26 20 39 SECOND QUARTER FOURTH QUARTER l
31 1
2 3
4 14 29 30 1
2 3
5 4o APR 7
8 9 10 11 1;
33 ocT 6
7 8
9 10
- ^
41 s
14 15 16 17 18 , .
16 5
13 14 15 16 17
." 19 42
/
WKs 21 22 23 24 25 '.
- ~~
17 wKs 20 21 22 23 24.
2:
43 28 29 30 1
2 is 27 28 29 30 31 2 44 5
6 7
8 9
iO 1:
19 3
4 5
6 7
8 9 4s my gay 12 13 14 15 16 iT ib 20 10 11 12 13 14 15 l e 46 d
19 20 21 22 23 _.
'i 21 17 18 T9 20 21 2-47 ms ms 26 27 28 29 30 ':'.
22 24 25 26 27 28 ;- 30 48 1
2 3
4 5
6 i
49 Juh 2
3 4
5 6
7 23 pEc 8
9 10 11 12 15 il so 4
9 10 11 12 13
- e 15 24 4
15 16'17 18 19 :'c 2i si wks 16 17 18 19 20
- 2-25 wxs 22 23 24 25 26 27 2E 52 23 24 25 26 27 2? 2c 26 29 30 31 MO M
T W
T F
5 WK Mo M
T W
T F
5 5
WK e
[
'(
p
- J.
1981 MSCR CRENDAR 1981 MO M
T W
T F
5 WK MO M
T W
T F
S WK FIRST QUARTER THIRD QUARTER 1
2 3
4 1
29 30 1
2 3
4 5 27 JAN 5
6 7
8 9
10 11 2
Jul.
6 7
8 9 10 11 12 28 5
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 s
s 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 29 WKs 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 4
WKs 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 30 26 27 28 29 30 31 1
5 27 28 29 30 31 1
2 31 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
6 3
4 5
6 7
8 9 32 FEB Aus 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 7
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 as 4
4 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 8
17 18 19 20 21 22 23 34 ms WKs 23 24 25 26 27 28 1
9 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 as MAR 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
to sip 31 1
2 3
4 5
6 36 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 37 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 11 4
4 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 12 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 38 wx3 WKs 23 24 25 26 27 ~ 28 29 is 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 39.
SECOND QUARTER FOURTH QUARTER 30 31 1
2 3
4 5
14 28 29 30 1
2 3
4 40
~
APR 6
7 8
9 10 11 12 is GCT 5
6 7
8 9 10 11 41 5
13 14 15 16 17 '18 19 16 s
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 42 WKs 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 17 WKs 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 43 27 28 29 30 1
2 3
is 26 27 28 29 30 31 1 44 4
5 6
7 8
9 10 19 2
3 4
5 6
7 8 4s my gay 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 20 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 46 d
18 19 20 21 22 23 24 21 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 47 us "8
25 26 27 28 29 30 31 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 48 30 1
2 3
4 5
6 49 JUN 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
23 DEC 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 so 4
8 9 10 11 12 13 14 24 4
14 15 16 17 18 19 20 51 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 25 WKs 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 s2 WKs 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 26 28 29 30 31 MO M
T W
T F
5 5
WK MO M
T W
T F
5 S
WK G EN ER AL h ELECTRIC
f:,
'q.' ' ':,.,;-],"-
7.~ ~
l :' ~ ~ ~
"=*~~v* :: '.~ ~- ~ '" '~. **'
Q!'~~ '- l
~~
~.
- 4 '
../,
,g
..T '. '
'N".'
c..
~
~
N1982 $
. FISCAL CALENDAR.
- 1982 p.,
[~ ~~
Mo' M T
W T
F
~ 3 WK MO M
~T W
T F
WK
~~
U FIRST QUARTER THIRD QUARTER d('._. jag
'4. 5 6
7 8
9 10 2
Jut
~
1 2
3 1
28 29 30 1
2 3
4 27
-5 6
7 8
9 10 11 28 E-11 12 13 14 15 16 17 3
5 12 13 14 15 16 17.18 29
~5
{
18 19 20 21 22 23 24 4
19 20 21 22 23 24 25 so WKs WKs p
25 26 27 28 29 30 31 s
26 27 28 29 30 31 1
si r.
i.
.1 2
3 4
.5 6
7 6
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 32 AUG 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 3a FEs 8
9 10 11 12 5
la y
e I-4 15 16 17 18 1920 2' 8
4 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 34
- ri
'~ -
wKs 22 23 ~24 25 26 27 2e wKs 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 as 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
30 31 1
2 3.4 5
36 gan SEP 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 11 6
7 8
9 10 il 12 37 4
4 15 16 17 18 19 ?(' ?!
12 MMMMU MN 38 l-wKs wKs i
22 23 24 25 26 2E 26 is 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 39 h~
SECOND QUARTER FOURTH QUARTER
[.
29 30.31 1
2 3
4 14 27 28 29 30 1
2 3
4o APR 5
6 7
8 9 li' !!
is Oc7 4
5 6
7 8
9 1r 4i r
5 12 13 14 15 16 ie io 16 5
11 12 13 14 15 16 42 l [
WKs 19-20 21 22 23 21
'.M 17 wKs 18 19 20 21 22 23 2e 43 i
26 27 28 29 30 1
2 is 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 44 t
I 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
19 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
45
[
NOV "AY 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 20 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 46 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 21 15 16 17 18 19 ?O ~2i 47 l
wKs wKs l[
24 25 26 27 28 29 30 22 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 48 1:
'c 29 30 1
2 3
4 5
49 31 1
2 3
4 o
6 2
JUN DEC 67 8
9 10 11 12 so 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 24 s
13 14 15 16 17 18 19 s'i L
14 15 16 17 18 19 20 25 wKs wKs 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 52 21 22.23 24 25 26 27 26.
~
27 28 29 30 31 sa b
Mo M
.T WT F
.5 5
WK MO M
T W
T F
5 5
WK
(
kn<
l [.5.'
GENER AL @ ELECTRIC t.. r '
9 A,
c.-. *.
- ~ -
= a.
= =. L
u, %=. pose.,,og 7,-
-,m;y -
v.
.j
~
"'3 GiNiaALOitictnic iI g-NUCLEAR CONTROL AND INSTRUMENTATION DEPARTMENT
% M t,.,
C PRODUCTIVITY IMPROVEMENT PROPOSAL I
ALL AREAS MUST BE COMPLETED BY PROPOSER i
EMP PAY NO.
CDP NO. EMPLOYEE NAME SLDG ROOM EXT
/ 6
/
3 7 -f 4 O M
6 6 6
6 y
N N
N 4 (* e W
L
/H
/ 4 s
S
- 7. 3
- f. "/
I 6
Z. O 4 9 8 3 S A A A
A I
L 4
,M i
1 l
A L s*t l
1
~7 5 5 1
5 1
YOUR JOB TITLE PROPOSAL TITLE A N M L 'f 5
T W
L A B i
G Al s l
N & t-R O t-5 i
G-ni Lt & R i F R
S It i
I WHO SHOULD EVALUATE YOUR PROPOSAL (CHECK ONE)
O PA8 O MECH O PANEL ELECT O PANEL NON E D PGCC O FARM OUT C OTHER BUY
, batered b sugeshow "Qfig Vc. *.h e a h ow ' 9-u S i b DESCRIBE YOUR PROPOSAL r
(
j For add ba l *,vderw4 \\ Ae et ( oev-. @ 2( wg,.shov)ure affa cke d. Adva he+ e f. bVicN 's s alen k vaad-Ised DVstM eA
- d**1ed b eknA, ve Mic adi sw da4us ?.pvicN ca., be ure d i
for 6% sar 's u d sca's. 3. /m 6,1 chae r 6 sop. 4, %
le n v-ed
, s ise a.d - Dvse M n.ets wdev. of ovevia.s i
esA.c sen a, A is -l LJ
'm qu Aic.s o, i n L o, o; u l i
4., v +.A - u c sib. r. F w verh dto el a, l l st l
o r d er-Dvsc A) skeet at ed... EcA/. /.. Avd:bble.
a.u,2La recov.a J cleared ddered ver' o cah.
I i
Nd-: k, h es r.<> P ch u a. ua d he i m% ode e.
DV l-S. A.1cL. c
,,w-s.uk.zr "9~s g r-YOU9t SIGNATURE (S) 3a A
" ~ ' ~ "
i ei EVALUATORS RECOMMENDATIONS I
CTECf. NAME OF PER N WHf MADE ACTUAL DECISION 0 ACCEPT REJECT g_
REASON FOR REJECTION - SHOULD BE A COMPLETE AND DETAILED STATEMENT SUITA8LE FOR INCORPO-RATION IN A LETTER DOCUMENTING THE NON-ADOPTION OF THE PROPOSAL IF PREVIOUS CONSIDERATIO HAS SEEN GIVEN TO THIS IDEA. INCLUDE REFERENCE TO SPECIFIC CORRESPONDENCE, DRAWIN HOP
,s n $r b
. Ada$unbrY M ck 6 w..,' $ 4
~
- ab7]i d
DHed J cs lu tW[tb EoMelL'A w J d bybd.L* a &,3 A haeb ', ed./.ow i LY c]cL -
4
,, } A
_d u +,.h.i
~
c.Lu 4 a>&
AaL &.2 L we.1 na casa c,Xj e L H.J meno as Wert 4
/
/
~
4*..
CONTROL & INSTRUMENTATION DEPARTMENT g
San Jose, California August 21,1981 cc:
D.W. Reigel TO:
G.B. Stramback
SUBJECT:
ENGINEERING CHANGE REQUESTS
REFERENCE:
1.
Nuclear Control & Instrumentation Department Practices
& Procedures Manual, Procedure 4.42, Design Document Change Control, 5/18/81 This is to infonn you of the current status of my change requests for this year, and suggest changes in our modus operandi. The status is shown in the current status list, which is attached to this letter.
Suggestions follow.
- 1. We need a procedure which authorizes us to f aitiate change
' requests. The current procedure, reference 1 authorizes only Manufacturing to do.so.
- t.. C;..r A.
t.
h
- m.,
2. The Engineering Change Request should be' established as having sufficient authority to make a change, or at least, to cor-rect an. error.. Many change, requests receiving no response.
are suffering from lack of authority.
Change requests form the basis for acceptance of parts of the FSAR.
When these change requests are not implemented, the review of the
~
affected FSAR I ti ns is void.
7 '..
3
>.w.. n.n...-
San A. Milam III
(
C&I Technical 1.icensing Mail Code 432 l
F
..a
^R e
e e
CURRENT STATUS OF CHANGE REQUESTS f
i SENT TO NUMBER
RESPONSE
C.R. Runnion 913-5M-8101-1 None K.K. Klein 913-SM-8104-1 Change Pending C.T. Young 913-SM-8109-1 Change Pending J.A. Lorain 913-52 -8111-1 Note 2 O.J. Foster 913-SM-8111-2 Cha%4 Pr 454 T.L. Garg 913-SM-8112-1 Note 1 C.R. Runnion 913-SM-8113-1 None 0.J. Foster 913-SM-8113-2 chage bd* 8'd W.R. Jones 913-SM-8115-1 Change Pending J.F. Mark 913-SM-8116-1 Change Promised K. Utsumi 913-SM-8116-2 None K. Utsumi 913-SM-8116-3 None L.J. Podrasky 913-SM-8117-1 Note 2 D.V. Thorne 913-SAM-8118-1 Note 3 A.L. Ostenso 913-SM-8121-1 None 913-SM-8121-2 Note 1 A. Rashad A. Rashad 913-SM-8121-3 None A.L. Ostenso 913-5M-8123-1 None A. Rashad 913-SM-8125-1 None
'F 913-SM-8127-l'
~. '
Note'2
- J.A. Lorain
~
' '~
A.L. Ostenso 913-SM-8127-2
'Mone '
~ ~
~
913-SM-8128-1 I None.
K. Utsumi a-r c.i g None:. 4,.
'l ' "~~ '*
'N 913-SM-8128-2 R. Stojakovic 3
913-SM-8128-31. *, *TA ', Note F% .
J.
s-C. Tang 913-SM-8130.fY "-7 ~None ~-:
~
N. Amin
' 4 % Lj;.i!,f, ..iL MD*'3! c; Note 1 Rejected. Will check current revision of drawing and re-submit change request if appropriate. .. 4 s.. a. Note 2 Engineer not available for comment g.. Note 3 Duplicated previously planned work 1
- n., -;. is.v.pp..
e 9-1 h l~ ._ __ 2 l',~_. Z1_ _.--_., - _.. _-. -.1 ^. -. ..l ' Z.' ' ~ ' ' ' ~
,y 0 -= 1,. Wo.rk. S e co rd fo r.w c o, k G( (f S {
- % h. Kilab Ur.
- i..
.t . 1, a sk e d ' w<: b da Lc,
- 5.
A koslo aff f : A tiz. docu- -h; 6 ;$ [. A.c.kav w cpes tp, he I r
- .. __. i LA 9.u -4.
l/ f r d-e,. 3,e e c k a $.e e g e d j. i i 91 T-5A M - 8 t 45 -l. E bid hi w ' ; F! wod t d a.t b e.. Q !e m e v-l e. d ( pi t ef p g , c e h.
- d
/-6 4-c ou sog u edisf I to o.4 fd y.. t. y re. it to s ypp o r t fu..P S A R. l j
- 4..
. p..._., _.... ;..... t _... _. ... _. e...._ __.. L' _. l... p._... i t t l t l L.RafeveQ.., s.i t i l_I j. [... j i..-. %1ep 9 'me Q..ea j 3_...! .... I _ _. it _ _.i E.4.ew.s.:coeeb.etg.t _- 2.. ..! 2.. 3[3.. i f.4 h I.M edk..s1. R._ _.l . l...... I.. .i ............;.. _t.4... ! K4.,'& (4.! w,i k 8,'s 't.. l ;. i =- -- p..
- T. ' l. 4 b.c (fo~ M A. $ila% E b.y i.
' C., B 3.t,ra,~.b a. d... G r 3 r e c.r.i 3 C.h av$ t....;_.. 1._ r i 7...... . j.._.. ;.. :R.eya_elh,. d $ws t.2 9.. I 9p t, 6, Ie d. 3....; .. j... _. , us ex k
- en4,
_l. ' I e H e r-fradh. A! M.:..'.s a 'ctr.. if .i (... ' R. (J Ri Lrek,, i char 3 R.S tes fl Proie A4, 3 M P z.2. s, l / r / s o, Ab e e v e r. 4, i s e a f i la J w o. k go es . '?, Il ew 3 ve L see I W ed e. ,, s } rw.e. I..m 5 (c v-f'2 t C ro ix 6 m - v. e, y, t 2,. 34 e abic-et-l ack.ew. bp e +,2 la iiw l u h C.b bu.j e r * }t^- C' t k I. I Y*$ '55 b 8* - T E. 3 A very Lor $ s b e.f ( s e c. rei e r o r r -s: ),bd.
- 1.
- d. i \\
pe <s 's si.. WW b we n ud '. t w [.<md p<v_.Au.r<.. Se e e3 G.r.e n.e (a. : .w ..w.
7,. 3 7 t..: _ -CONTROL & INSTRUMENTATION OEPARTMENT San Jose, California cc: D. W. Reigel o November 2,1981 TO: A. Koslow
SUBJECT:
VERIFICATION OF DESIGN CHANGES
REFERENCE:
1. E0P 42-6.00. Independent Design Verification, 4/30/81 2. Letter from O'. W. Reigel to W. F. Gibford B. P. Grim and G. B. Stramback. Transfer of Design Responsibility, i September 18, 1981 i Changes made by component 913 engineers are being verified by engineers from components 901 and 909 who are responsible for the system being changed. This is in conflict with reference I which states that the ver-ifier must be a person who "Is not directly responsible and accountable for .the design...." Since only the FCD's and IED's were reassig' ed by n reference 2, the component 901 and 909 engineers are still primarily res-i ponsible for the design and cannot be verifters for their own system. I recommend that component 913 engineers be cautioned to use verifiers who are not re xmsi le for the-system being changed. [ b7 Qp W . :. ~' .s Sam A. Milam III C&I Technical Licensing WC 432 Ext. 55151 $4y s y. ' _p.... : i t 1 i l / 3 l
k i 1 \\ i \\ Wic Re,. cd I'I'S w 3 3 e,, L l, I e, u l e,- 1
- 3.1 - t J hhva,gb f o - 2 4 15.-
f f I i t i f i I f' i. i t l I } I i l l s i ? 4 l I l f I t 6 i I I I f 6 6 i l l 6 } } l i i i l I I f I e k gp - p 6 6 i i t I l i l 1 i i i 8
e e emamee- - eme.- es..e* m==., , aman..-
- ,e
, en g 1980 FISCAL CALENDAR 198[ MOlM T W T F ,S s lWKl MO l M T W T F S s WK FIRST QUARTER THIRD QUARTER i l 1 2 3 4 1 30 1 2 3 4 ! 27 JAN 7 8 9 10 11 l2.Jul.!7 8 9 10 11 . 2a l 5 14 15 16 17 18 !3 5 114 15 16 17 18 ! 29 : WKs 21 22 23 24 25 '4 WKs '21 22 23 24 25 ' 30 ;
- 28 29 30 31 1
5 28 29 30 31 1 sii 4 5 6 7 8 32l f6 4 5 6 7 8 Auo F88 7 11 12 13 14 15 -
- 33 11 12 13 14 15 4
4 18 19 20 21 22 a 18 19 20 21 22 ! 34 wKs wKs 25 26 27 28 29 9 25 26 27 28 29 ! as I-1 2 3 4 5 36 man 3 4 5 6 7 to sip 8 9 10 11 12 37 10 11 12 13 14 11 4 4 17 18 19 20 21 12 15 16 17 18 19 3a wKs WKs 24 25 26 27 28 13 22 23 24 25 26 39 SECOND QUARTER FOURTH QUARTER 31 1 2 3 4 14 29 30 1 2 3 40 APR 7 8 9 10 11 is CCT 6 7 8 9 10 41 s 14 15 16 17 18 16 5 13 14 15 16 17 42 WKs 21 22 23 24 25 17 wKs 20 21 22 23 24 43 28 29 30 1 2 is 27 28 29 30 31 44 5 6 7 8 9 19 3 4 5 6 7 4s y,y goy 12 13 14 15 16 20 10 11 12 13 14 46 4 4 19 20 21 22 23 21 17 18 19 20 21 47 wKs wKs 26 27 28 29 30 22 24 25 26 27 28 48 1 2 3 4 5-49 JUN 2 3 4 5 6 23 oEc 8 9 10 11 12 50 4 9 10 11 12 13 24 4 15 16 17 18 l'9 si 16 17 18 19 20 25 wKs 22 23 24 25 26 s2 w>s 23 24 25 26 27 26 29 30 31 l MO M T W T F s S WK MO M T W T F s s WK
~._, - 7 3 l I l .f t -g I i + i t i w i t l ( I t t W c r Y rc.-.i . L. c.___(.o. r 's..F..%_) I. i. b_>w .QA.!.13 -P .-[ .[. I t =. _ _ _.... l _._Lmp. T.1 o.l..Mc' /M
- L._
1 M av_b _! ble l .J 4,.. d...
- .. ;.\\.
U.e.V.... d. W I 2 2. s___._o g wA y a G <, L_. ',, n. .ec._i,4 la,. ; i 4 M, .e. ioo a -..he3.<t1. c c b; n...} s i: L'. b i..... ! t . l.i.c. e ?.,. _.M ? X. i6 L .m N u 4 e r.. _L __L . 1/_<. 6. 'd. 1 J. g.f.s.p e v.. n.._.. _y. b1.3.c.m.s _. w.e h_. _a o i o n, L. u. P,., '/ 4 ..... I _.\\..,. n. -T,t r.. -., L. .u (5 -YYyM:.u.i \\ _.k v '^ t'__ YL c;% $.'t.\\ J. .v t *.N '. I Nr fle . T.Ci, o - _a_c uhr c p k.. .s. e 9 -.Li p,....
- 3...'.
_.t.p e b-k ML'. ( ,, a l'g. A ' C.. f .f', ' ' '. I'27 .C J
- k'.).S f._
6 6_.-.h__2.t w_C A. mb c.6 i Je.+ 6n.__ I I I 1--- h.,., L - .U..__,.u.L _..... t.m..u. _.... .r_. 1' .. _ _ ( e. * /"*. ..s..- .....i _..! _ s. l' ( t = g 4 ** k.* } k LA 14 a g kJ '
- tgu,s,,.
'g, g,,,,,, ,,,jg.,,,_. r. c1
- 9
.._.J.'.t.b.!.a.t .'m M _ M.0 A...) 0.q
- I U.O.l.,l 1_
..Q O.< 5 b. i.d a..l.e/i._ n.d
- d. da L.va ' t e.
k. L.. _.L. T.. . w..,., ... i. - I i p ..i a.i. _,6 J.. 3 .g..... i _.... t._ _.h.p A..._i. k.. i ( W,s p.; l 1 ...g . w I l...r. ig a, <4 l w, r .... _. L'. - 4 .s s )..h. Ax4.'i t o$ _db_.D L.J.r. u... i S Q.A._.1:..- 3 o ...1 .:.:. y.: : :._5.Lty r p :... e t a.. .L.i _ t'.: ae u;e\\ p.' M..m'e_r, n. t. 3l ,..y. ...t, .. ~.. p.-. g-.:..j :.. ...~ i l 1 _ gt. m1 .a....u ...n . _.s s. 4 '\\ h.e :..uc. Li.h .. u___i t.c.. r _ - 1 b.. c Ih.c. f; e c_. '" ] c LN. it.5, L. W !. _.. 1.
- h.._ j _
l'p...tu a k u..y i I. - 5b^N . f.. _...L.. i.. 'LO. p.::.i.I F_9 1.'e.t...:.X.f.,a.... ... _ _. -.. p... - i ..e
- i. * * *
- v.
- GENERAL @ ELECTRIC - I b CObk** I' O TO DATE CC: PiNP CwN+ .UBJECT e( d f' ww t u :1 k ho a v d I T_.....h....a.. 4........b....e..e...n..... 'i 4.......c....~.... d........ L...,.. p....s......E....g......e. d..W........ . b..... 4... 2.7.M....... S. . p......).f 4.V.S. A...k..$..Q.n......"A..C'.h.. ..$.4. 6... ..M..Y.g.W 5.. i ~ f..G.4.. ...he.r.m..i..n A...I...h.Gr. 5.. ..M... m.. .l..Q.M..? e.. 3..v...d....$ 1. A h..l.e..,.. ... p. f). d..v..'.".'.M......h...h..y.. g..... $..O.. M..........*..*..... - ......h..... 9.Y'c...d. 5..I....v 3...... ..C. f. 3.g.C.. *. O...".... v..'.. ; .k.. 3..S......d..e....A.'.s..kY..k.. ..............h..w 3 .. C.n..l.........s.. ... V.d.J..U..... - 8.n...o'. .Rn$.......n... a....[.. V.
- 4. A."A.r..b..S.......b..II..h OL..W.C.....h A d.....M a..q..
..h.G.W.'Arg.l.. ....b.d... L p..R.A.I..b.y.....t M..%..-.. .M..W.3.%.#.....f. W. &....... .C m N.M..L... .'A d.l... j...."&.'a .)..b..' --4......O. b..........W I...\\.I......$..M S I..h.k.........b.....5..be.W.J....MI.9..M.,...p.0.C. ~ f.Y..k..W.. )... 9'..f......C.1. S'\\... ...R..h [.$..b. ..K. ..Yl. 6.3..S..A.W. 9.4..... P. nam.. . '.e - .. m..... g.... a. m...I....,... Sa~d-A~ ..,.y. Te......../../....o..r......... 7...H._.../...N.....K........... 6... 2......... .ftM..... M....../...S....K............ s... AAT.......... A........ Ww'. W.o...F......C......D....... 7..k... e.. 7... 3...... *.. ... 4.. 0........ M.....S........M... .../....c.... US...C.... O...........n... W.! k.A G S/.S T d.N D..... l ....7'... I. 8.... e 4 l .k.......... .9.. .R.......I.b.. ...k3.M. b .AN.h. ..t... itN YOUR NAME PLAINLY sesen te, s
. o, See. i4 rm 5
- ek So21
...r._ ~- .g - t* MR. METRIC 2257 Old Midd:eheld Way i j 3, 17 { ] Mt. View, CA 94043 (415) 969 0773
- Telex 334439
'N Onn;6 Gs Woc ces Eussc y D,u, a sA _1 L_ 2 w2 t s i-s o, ...., _ i. . _......_ _....._ ;.t,_.,7 __ too 100 m%/[hmm,e5FArb,m.s. 9 ' % / 4,7_1 ~ %i 3I = Ic7Au ' 6.00 AGIQ Y0t 4 b5H b b 80 3, I i W l l THANK YOU
-.h si f f ~, ' 00. TROL AND INSILETATION DEPART'!ENT V SAN' JOSE CALIFORNIA - y April ' 4, ' 1980 - To: Unit 995 From: C. L. Cobler
Subject:
ECN Verification Statement Be best verification statement would list all the doctments reviewed that are associated with the change. Since this is impractical with the ntaber of drawings and documents involved in our floor ECNs, a reference to the location i of the document is required. Eis is acconplished by listing the DRF number in the Verification colum along with our standard phrase. De attached is a list of all current DRF ntabers for Perry and Clinten. m 'd /S-C. L. Cobler, Manager Mail Code 036, Ext. 5-2583
- kms Attachment s
W i, - t n.., .n - ~. .-..a --.w .,,oa4+-g,a. 9 -,__-4._w. + - _ g 9 g-m-___--. y g-.a---p_ %,m.mm%pw=,p,,.msgp_w9-ww <m--, g.-r,m,-.7--
= CONTROL AND INSTRUMENTATION DEPARTMENT cc: W. Marklein SAN JOSE CALIFORNIA B. Johnston F. Cadigal e G. Gibb:ns W. Heinig ) January 4.198,0 T0: B. Ferris FROM: J. R. Cintas O,,
SUBJECT:
Design Record Files - Responsible Engineer Assign:nents
- l TheupdatedresponsibleengineerassignmentsforUI11t939designrecord files are as shown below. Please make necessary reassignments.
PROJECT ORIGINAL CHANGED DATE CHG ORF ), PANEL RESP. ENGR. TO ENTERE0 Perry 1. 2 FC3 H13-20 B. Johnston F. Cadigal 12-26-79 F00 H13-20 D. Villers F. Cadigal 12-26-79 F612 H13-20 D. Villers F. Cadigal '12-26-79 P613 H13 J. Willis F. Cadigal 12-26-79 P614 H13-20 D. Villers F. Cadigal 12-26-79 P619 H13-20 D. Villers F. Cadigal 12-26-79 r618 H13-20 D. Villers B. Johnston 12-19-79 F621 H13-20 D. Villers B. Johnston 12-19-79 FP2 H13-20 D. Villers B. Johnston 12-19-79 e'E ? 3 H13-20 J. Willis B. Johnston 12-19-79 P625 H13-20 D. Villers B. Johnston 12-19-79 F623 H13-20 D. Villers B. Johnston 12-19-79 P629 H13-20 D. Villers . B. Johnston 12-19-79 P631 H13-20 D. Villers B. Johnston 12-19-79 P(32 H13-20 D. Villers B. Johnston 12-19-79 P642 H13-20 D. Villers B. Johnston 12-19-79 P691 H13-20 D. Villers B. Johnston 12-19-79 P692 H13-20 D. Villers B. Johnston 12-19-79 P693 H13-20 D. Villers B. Johnston 12-19-79 P694 H13-20 D. Villers B. Johnston 12-19-79 "P.f d c. ' N/3-7 4-Clinton I H13-28 F600 H13-28 B. Johnston G. Gibbons 12-20-79 P610 H13-28 D. Villers F. Cadigal 12-27-79 i + / D612 H13-28 C. Canham F. Cadigal 12-27-79 P613 H13-28 C. Canham F. Cadigal 12-27-79 ___..,-,-._..-,_,,-_,_-,._,.,-,_,___.,_._,m__
- 8. Ferris 1/04/80 s
PROJECT ORIGINAL CHANGdo DATE CHG ORF & PA*iEL RESP. ENGR. TO ENTERED Clinton 1 H13-28 P614 H13-28 C. Canham F. Cadigal 12-27-79 P619 H13-28
- 8. Johnston F. Cadigal 12-27-79 P632 H13-28 J. Willis B. Johnston 12-19-79 P642 H13-28 J. Willis
- 8. Johnson 12-19-79 P656 H13-28 C. Canham G. Gibbons 12-21-79 P657 H13-28 C. Canham G. Gibbons 12-21-79 P678 H13-28 J. Leseney G. Gibbons 12-21-79 P679 H13-28 C. Canham G. Gibbons 12-21-79 PGCC H13-16 W. Heinig R. Mercado 12-21-79 Att 155P ?W-S HG -2S TVAX17-X22 H13-25 P600 H13-25
- 8. Johnston G. Gibbons 12-20-79 P610 H13-25 D. Villers F. Cadi' gal 12-27-79 P612 H13-25 C. Canham F. Cadigal 12-27-79 P613 H13-25 J. Willis F. Cadigal 12-27-79 P614 H13-25 C. Canham F. Cadigal 12-27-79 j
P619 H13-25
- 8. Johnston F. Cadigal 12-27-79 P632 H13-25 C. Canham
- 8. Johnston 12-19-79 P642 H13-25 C. Canham
- 8. Johnston 12-19-79 P656 H13-25 C. C3nham G. Gibbons 12-21-79 P657 H13-25 C. Canham G. Gibbons 12-21-79 P678 H13-25 Unassigned G. Gibbons 12-21-79 PGCC H13-15 R. Mercado M. Tadjalli 12-21-79 Q
VJ. R. Cintas PGCC Panel Module Design Engrg.-CRE Mail Code 036. Ext. 5-3773 / % ggy 664f.S.- Aoo-M4 q%gey 2]e P /!/3 ~).2 / 'V ' " O f /luns ///2 '?foo, to3, to +', h 7, to f f 0 9, //% f/6 M i% PW, ff 4'i NC fdd, fS 7 fdt H f f ?/ J 72, i z f 7.3, / El, f f 4, P 8J, 902, 90 % M ?C 7 i / 949 f '776 f70 f77 / / /
~' * * ' {. L 'l l l l 3 e I. j i I i l l l ,i 1 l i - s t, l i. l [ .. [s c.5ce r M' N L S. (Vo ck _... a,.....x -:. u L. { FI. l,)..._?"*' ] c-- i = i t. .'sk'.l %.3__ Y l, ir.4 %. u .J. ..D:.. ,>., 6.{_;c_.,, J ..r. _IP, bdh__.m . _us.f._Cm >-!. !.ij ). f 9 I i .i. _.. _ _. t. i, e r = _ _. Tag.b. l.. 4.<> .L_. h...E.. L3.o.o .E M. P.t. 4 '.r.-d.6. <. 3 O_1.LL Sirou 4A_ 14c_ .6 tt_ o b.n. p = .2 I n c. d,t.:rbtel '. d.. 1- . u.mn.. t t,, t.,. i s +, - _.LI _.,) (...3 4 ., i..c ..t l LL - I e L.t a-.__La_ .y t_ F, r t. .j.,_3.; _.. g.>, s 1. e, s ..a _ ,+ l 4
- c... r T~ k d.h..l.a..xi.._W_' V e'tI^ N e
l. e u.t c+ \\ \\sp ? v ;G '.6 ! < sutp. *3*
- t. r ' e
- e f-L ev -, ca. -
i~ te e .'. <l d L.I.,. 3f. u.. N. 4.,_s'. I { ..c.d..b .d. Mu__e _Lu_. hi 6 m e, _ou A^ p ~".:1.vL A-s.u.1 L._ ~: 'q .:.:&._. Olu.k a;t b._ah Wl o s>.t _., i t. I 4e v, e s, n 1_ )b A.e.. c. I .i
- di e a
m,W_g 4,. I t : o h 3d N I ..v,.l r . 11. '. _d.I. f A i != c' 4 $*:. Y JhL - kat. L s ! :x.,l..e u t. h,. s u ?,Kl.a.6.2 ..w h.e d.d. Rid._ c hdx. . :.L .b e. s.e. 1E.i:d. uTx. < ht.._ s 'c.c.r, L2.. _ I .f...-' ~2' D 1.e e r 4 S.A._.f r...h... v.ai a. i I, . 4.'. t d. ____ F.. w d t..e <.t,._ r_ a W..f.1:_c.... t 1 3 L. 2 .t j @_1r15.dq. LAS:lsL
- 3. 1 p.n t._.'til/r.
ce u /*Aca. < n.t.r 4t. I. V e.c.'..Lird __.tha.t..AA_, i L_ ' h.d. lu (\\. \\ed '. m._.La,- co<b <+ e ' a. > -w NoY o r e o v. Mt +b me;l o r aflI._ba c- -..R3.ddr_d * %^._k s.z)F w %\\ A. uu. Lw i. e 3.3. :. q_ n T a.u.L._lo.lL.eaw_ 2 u) L _ __3.w. m....c.t..u.m._. %tf1.b.., 5__u.u_L B_1M.._. _.. J. _. _, _ _..a' t N .ba l* t k, 4g. ._.,a_ta,.h a u i r;tu <*, 6 ~- ti. _m-a, E. o, s.t.w_Up i j - f \\ o
i i i I l t i g ( ...y - L. t, c.. K.,.. t, ,,n =.../ .a 1 ___ n.,.A..,. a.. A' _. i ,1 ...7 i l3.. o e_
- r.
l Ibbx L.5.. M.SPt4.[ d.. .. L..._. r .. _.(en.. _ 3A. L. L,..,.f..,.M.....M c....... ._g. I e 4 i < _, '-) -- b [.v..i 9:1.. p'.i.t. ' (~d.' r i s.. i e,',eJ.?,..*,9.d-[. i i. 4 7 _.3. 3 I e i l i .4._,.-__.,... ......7 i i i .I 1 l l I i I p
- g....,... y
. 7. 4 L_ c, t i i g s i i_.. v
- 7.._..
~.p__ ..._....7-i . ! _ _ w. I I .i.. l i ,_.. 7..., i i e i w 6 i 4 _i i_ _ l.. i 6 6 i e ..t._.!..._...'.... i i l I i..._..........i. I a j l l i ____.1.-._. t..... l .,. _. - i ,I .i I 6 I i 1._. ...._.._...... j._. 4 j -l _.L O..... L i i e i . h,... J... ; L.. . r 4 1 i f i. 7._. 7-l_ --.._.. - i d i. e t 1 _. +. i ,9 i i i l l ... ~_..... A e f i =... _.... l i .y_._... u m p.$6 m
- g..
._p-e. ..a.. .g..g.. .I. l i t 6...........-
m i e { i n t %..rk. ttCo.d fV,..u.nik. Go(Io .. _.._._..SwA m har-h_ u m,., h ti, .L 3 1...- H. t i. - l W 1 ., ~. ~ b.'. 1 l '... g hu
- o.'~- \\ ' t.
- s
.1. f du.,e_:u...Ca h_ 'LN.t nt..* ). 24t'.,.- 'l '. N 3..) .= ....1._. ._. F,,, i... s. -.... _ t. i __. L. 2.a.dti.<.u. 3.e\\e u 2_'d u.e.- Lt.L._. m. _.. _ J n.m. n...s...t %...'t.. 4 c' s _..r..m..., v. '. 9.. a.. i..s i l I . _. _ _ _ _ _- W fn,
- r,.,, ' 1, i,.. ',,...
_.._.G.k...l. u L W,.A. 1-A.....
- v. e. D.h.l l..._
i \\ ' k.a._.L LLax.t_.1...nh.,z
- ':_ e..: '... :..
m 'L _t_O,fL.t.cn_.3'.g.. @.f41%. p p'.... 'Li.u.v_f.j... oL_B.U. 4.i.wh d. Mr>':,.'m 4 . J ).'t i..r... L ~ s_ i.N1'.__.4.jLdle_e._.gWu '.b..r s..:.i ch._L..L ldl ......L Fu d.k. u.. h.e_..du.L._1.ti.3;a.f_.D.g.__. _A r e. c.6.2 __[_lr_r_..u.bu._..t.:.. _.: h.c_.uti. a
- f. _ f_. / ' s 1
M.in. _EL w p.u.h I l't _ Qc,, p_b.u....' d... i S v soe e. ' \\ i ? \\.t l C.ia.ao l h W v.... _ l. o 4..._-I r L.aL. h.
- t.r.1 I s a o.
nra I_Le,.....C., u.4. i........_. > t... 1/ '.. _.G..y.iz.... s> y. h hy. i.',.<_../6.r..L t.t, x _ h.c DC.. JI. h...o.n.c.:..Li.u.LL.e...11..e.uk..... _ _1 .S Y ). $ C L y. _:O...W l$'_C &.MD O.f. h. h.c_ ?.2. C ut.t.c.mf.t.l.__ d).mtw.t. .d_L k.1 .t.1. _ yn .ag c LL.s.ota, 4 i .. ~.. -. _. 'll.- T w _3 '_.' rio ]t '.i.tp _ b e -( 0 (_' .1 # } 6'e s j.,.i /,- a l a Ji m 1,. c 1. ~.' 4 m,,,,',. , - I h.i. 6,,., ,,,1' I i .I w.cm $ i o p.o1,,..c W N L L h _-
- k. e.a.w. a 6. \\.o
.n. Aw _A. ' ' d \\, n.., dJ d_M .3...*.. _ Y.# Y,. .j . f.U t.._.. _ _
- d.Lt.c.m. amu _ w.,u p..UL.Lk
__ u..M___. g ns.., u, - m.. , 2,. r. r. L ......,o,-. i. t + i V
- s.
i/,e p g { g; g,,, j, l 't 3 .,p I f g h f i t ~.. -..... .4 ...64 a Ws 6 a. . s_
f I i t. v l b A ) O..e. '_* _. 8 1 L. .e. o ......._m.'Ai...... ..i .g, . l 'b. l. I C- .. p... ]. ,.'y..,g..
- s. ;. *.s.
E,' ~ ~.e. :. s..: : s v..:.....n.i:l N.~.tW!; I. v ...., ) ..t. '..,.....;....Li. _. ~.- - u _ 2 ^ ' .3.'.1....."1'.L A 1..'.._ L,L.L d..'.. ?. ..L.' -.e _.i.. 4_... P., A... . _"T.~~.b..'.'.e..._.$7. _v...S _....._.E.i,M S_a g.k. e_.- - i I . ~ _ ...: ) .s., e.
- * ). <.,.._.._..
e i i + t . I i I -.....t.# ..... _.,, -.... s.,..r a t. ..cs e..a 1 ; e.. wA_ _"s: .<2.T %..T,D..-.. !.,. *.. r .r. V A. ? 2. r i .C. 4. t..,1%.....'.....S..L. O.... 2, I i 'i. .m_ .i_. . J g g.i . i. .b... d.._ . L.4 y.. L n.. O p G. ( o. r ..... _.' _. q, g,..t.,.. 't t. i. i J. CF. , *1 e ,y_a__.. ..7.. 4< .eo s
- s. o s.,
i . i
- 9.. ;..i.l..I l d. 1.$.
i .y
- e. U.'....,
.,_'.'t L.'*. :....L.*1..- .i s ...(,....,. _.. [....,.. b .. + .,. _..._e . I - -..:. t e, n l._.,.1... c.. l _b..i...i O. _y..C. A. 6.. I .... ~ q.'.1,. (
- c.. "
_' },b... _..i. w. i t < s. p _......., . _. L_ _'. g L,. f.9.. A..._(_., r _ u ;.u _.,g (.....i( f l ..... _/. /.,... 5... i.s ..t'. c M t. !,. ..D..Ci !. \\E.N. O. '.i '..*. e.w. f.. _ - *. - !. r e.. <?a.w <....".: m u._ k u._ m.12.) '. '.tr... t. '_.. .. '.e, i _'i.?._ r. f. i '..t ' ' f. 2 '..V. ' " Ltu r _ _U.'* /.a t._.. t. .6 .,,_.._s _._e-- .._....u..,rI t... l _ k o v u n i.L n.g /.n y.c.n.' h. a d. d. y.i..e. P ei U r. e.:... b tt. v D ' tb21p.w.sid \\ > q_ihwp.ep e d u._'t. '.)c.n.c.._- I f *I k d r i _.. p.:j_ v v r 6 d ,l_. l t k o '- u.4. [. e i. T i n t b a c __ h o.u.r._t._ N
- k. m.h ' '. bri.i..' a < < c A..__
I \\ 1 - w.u._ -;d.b c._:.c.'r.Le m C.'4 =_m.a L. u.v.!.u..... '}L V its. u r.. m w. L {...:s_L.i 6 ._la u.. __J. e' ,. 3 n m. 4._ _.- er... tL., a_ b 1 \\ 4. 1.g '.. y.qr ...__....-l i .e, r._:. c,,..i.s .n.. (3A. ...r--..+., ..y 4 .. a.a... l i I l t t 6 .. =
e i i I .a9 \\ E e . / n., (-.....,.e.
- p......
5>}. .~ %, A us 1 .4\\ \\ ;i st.t. ~'l. '4 - L' ' 2.'.:-L'_ '. e L. - <..(... ' '. . /. t
- Q*
i. .,= i w L.1 'i. 4 t .e. ........L. ' G.c_t.s4 fi.{._ 1...Lt,9. 4 c., m....... 1 i...t.e.t '..,2.. I '.. fat C es..,. t 1 e. y \\
- u..
c,. 8 p ?,(1; t L,,.r ... C. :'.. 'N.m.
- w. 2
' vs h r.k ' *,.. *.e ',.; I. .f... L >, e ' d. 2... t 1 (, c __.'g-I, '/......... _..... ' l I i 'S h.tb. c.v>.\\.N D Y.,'t',6. f .*l
- *i.*..{.
.L. ? ' t L.; 4 4.> r-A,, I i w ..a.. t..., c.., -., i -t... r.i.,. s.- .f ^ ..i. 6 b. 3_. i i a.
- "
- Se c /t.0 n.. ca... 'jh'.:1d:
0 V r.r.t ( 1 '~.e,4 t . '. ' %,M =.. '... /r.. k a. w e. % v e -.r w..r .. (...o,e. .s.. i a e,lb o c 'kqh__,.4.r..,'_!r'_..' '. e I .> l '. ' ' '.. r. 1 4 __...__...r- . L. 3' 7, >.) i { . ?. o. s tr, u...,,,.2.;. :.' .p.. ~bu d c.(' fo .hi_i.u._I.d..-.. l k..,. .L-5, .ea..ej., i. 6. 4.,U t. h i Oc.t,. hx k i.5 N.d.m. b Y 2 9.' w..s. '.I n U n I N \\ ' a,, E R ' ".T V., , !,..y'.. >.... I,, ^A '. - ---s = Lt'....., A - 7 ' ^ + %...L* L _v..EL O c' r*- Lt . y_. : e .o 9' . v. i s. _. ( w( i. r. W .. v. m.. C. g. .,,.3 4.. - i a n. ) . LL M.r? r.' Lt.n....W." '. g.. : W 3. .- 71.L'.h.126'.~.L. I?.n. 2 'b. ! ' !$L....b r. b. (. .. l.. .M.? OM.S. h') L*h... 1t. *... e ' d 'v.. ' I... M . Y. .1. ]... I .= M I b C Yah.u Yi ap' } N.'l. bo....d.v.i ' 3. l.k.0. d.h L a @ i v..) t ' ),i d ' vN 4 . i i. i i.- @ !.,e d v..,, f s. s. ,i { t =- ' ...t---* ' 9. i , a l.. e i., ~7 ECNc.4.....- fis...,.. E - l / ) e t.
- u.. u __,.... _. e.._. _9,.,..........
ei i t t y. .~
4 e t 4 .[ i 4 4 2.'_f..Y.t* 4 J l y _'.4 t . b I :s = / -s %s. /t. w1....... m.........._. -.-... ..........~ . ! l.__.9 'S .\\.r.1.?."'r. .7 W.\\.3
- 8 < i.
,a. f o. *~ w : w.2 i ' 9 _ = $ 2Xf. Ct..' s'*.C...).Q w be. U 9.1. 5. 4 4.d.- fo*. ' ' * :. h ' 3 1 . 3.n cy._*-. -. ).u... . s W a _:r.e.. :.t: ^, t.iC1.. A k.. m * *. -..c.. :tl. b ~ ' * "
- t-
.......[_w._....., _..:. g.... -.. e.i.- ~. _......v.. t s.i.. u.a o. 4 . k d e (,...... [:_ l'.4 c,, -fR (, - u... a *s '.. -,,.... . m a..... + (.1 g.. y >.a.. - ' - [c......., r
- .ylk..f.n v.__ P.' ad c_.L,.O L r. e %v 3,5f....S.. L 2, Nr IM t
W
- U *' c. 1 t :? L.. L._hH b *.i w u1 A A. It. :' o. :) -
,, n..u. f ' _$_ r. q_,. i l. * % 5 w.( _s v. 6 o L 2. >!t. C-4 1 f o s t G r_J bl C., ' n el.T V 4
- ,..v, a'd..e.r.i.sfi_.$..
D (*.D=" V L.'3 t- ~ 1 - J n_-_.h_ a.b. i;u I. L..e. ..cf r.a.,,., s,.. 4. i. _ o % I. o S '.w.,Ln. _L(13_L f _6_m"T!/,.A. 1A C a f 'to S. U3, I _.~ l, A
- l. s. o._c
(;_n,m 3 n,s L a '# I ~ a.c.) h o -i i.L J__, a nt.c.c_m._. _the_. o.m e Lt..t
- d. a.
..IV.t.d..' w.n '
!."C k.. - -_.- I I y*' s e. ._ r e._. '\\.o _.-., _ _i g , e e.> _1..) 2 A t e l = h E a b 4 4 = a 4 l ) l I l 3 9 94e. **45s me.eme... ,.g,,,, g,,,,, .g. e ...._e b . l g
,) G E N E R A L h E L E CTR I C q, . ) 4. hl.- ( h r i # om N - ( 3 ' 9 Q CC-C k-
- C '' h k i. '
$c i-! n., R u> ce k C\\ a 2.1 D. H. Cu e r i e ble es 6 '" R e 2 d c e A b SJ, M h .a.th.adeA..reprh 1.s.. h 4.ewdoI 4e, A c, c e o d... s e r % 3...Re a d or Meie Sw M po b ew...k.'sa n7 > co b t em.,... 2 n.A .vr pe s b.. cor re t h.e . 2. d t ca. The -ape <tl.'.Als..m,4es a.s s e c.b i e.d it c.k c>T P co P e-r. a.n E e 3 M q. -.s nA.. c_ed..;.k s c.. k h. u.i......-. b . h. . ( ... b ..b.k @,.. . O h.... 8 L W %.. C kO\\ bD ).l.h.... 2 s.....e s..Wle-. Sw i t A.. ud 'is.se\\f -ex(4?% h. y.J Ib. ba.% f er..I m3....si..vwWaI: ed..I s,...k.d.ww G k+k
- u. %..,
[ a..c. h.3..'.i.>... h e..
- w...hout....haPPexe d aY eaci i.w w. e......
k \\s o.3... f.I.&25.g.......no h..h.....p9.3..b.l.0 9.3.., ct, M ;7 c.2.: 3 .ycw.- .A vs......l1*.y... . C W... 3 .. W,.. f.._yo . c. Co^CIM5's8.M-T 2 u d....f..(A.R.s... .i..h D. 6 2 h,; .,g,, i,k % w s D., _,,., b.2 b d.e_...Q,M .k..........,, 2N YOUR NAME PLAINLY samom .,._-__.._._--____.._-_--_......._.___~_..___..._m .m.-. ....}}