ML20205G520
| ML20205G520 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | LaSalle  |
| Issue date: | 03/24/1987 |
| From: | Hind J NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | Reed C COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO. |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20205G523 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8703310475 | |
| Download: ML20205G520 (2) | |
See also: IR 05000373/1987009
Text
DMD
'
- . . -
. _
,
dhiL.V w uu.,V IHrUhI o\\
MAR 2'41987
Docket No. 50-373
Docket No. 50-374
Commonwealth Edison Company
ATTN: Mr. Cordell Reed
Vice President
Post Office Box 767
Chicago, IL 60690
Gentlemen:
This refers to the routine safeguards inspection conducted by
Messrs. G. Pirtle, T. Madeda, and J. Kniceley of this office on March 2-10,
1987, of activities at LaSalle County Station, Units 1 and 2, authorized by
NRC Operating Licenses No. NPF-11 and No. NPF-18 and to the discussion of
our findings with Mr. G. J. Diederich at the conclusion of the inspection.
The enclosed copy of our inspection report identifies areas examined during
the inspection. Within these areas, the inspection consisted of a selective
examination of procedures and representative records, observations, and
interviews with personnel.
During this inspection, certain of your activities appeared to be in violation
of NRC requirements, as specified in the enclosed Notice. A written re ponse
is required.
Section 7.b of the Report Details discuss commitments in reference to the
security lock and key program.
Flease advise us in writing within 30 days
after receipt of this report if our understanding of your commitments is
incorrect.
Security management concerns are noted in Section 5 of the Report Details.
The lack of aggressive management attributed to the violations noted
pertaining to lighting and vital area barriers.
Areas examined during this inspection concern a subject matter which is exempt
from disclosure according to Part 73, Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations,
Section 73.21(c)(2).
This information must be handled and protected in
accordance with the provisions of 10 CFR 73.21. Consequently, the enclosure
to this letter, our report of the inspection, and your response to the
violations identified in the enclosure to this letter will not be placed in p[
the NRC Public Document Room. Therefore, your statement of corrective action
j
regarding the violations identified in the enclosure should be submitted as
a separate enclosure to your transmittal letter in the manner prescribed.
)
The responses directed by this letter and the accompanying Notice are not
subject to the clearance procedures of the Office of Management and Budget
as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, PL 96-511.
Enclosure contains
8703310475 870324
SAFEGUARDS INFORMATI0F
DR
ADOCK 0500
3
Upon separation this
,n
,,,,,
,
, ,
, _
on
1 u)MJD i h 'U 1 V M IUB
P88' IS D " H d
_ _ _ _ .
,
I
b
,
Commonwealth Edison Company
2
We will gladly discuss any questions you have concerning this inspection.
Sincerely,
' Yhr
ck A. H nd, Director
Division of Radiation Safety
and Safeguards
Enclosures:
1.
2.
Inspection Reports
No. 50-373/87009(DRSS);
No. 50-374/87009(DRSS)
(UNCLASSIFIED SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION)
cc w/ enclosure:
D. L. Farrar, Director
of Nuclear Licensing
G. J. Diederich, Plant
Manager
IE File
IE/DI/0RPB
IE/ES
NMSS/SGPL
NRR/PWR-B/SSPB
cc w/ enclosures, w/o
UNCLASSIFIED SAFEGUARDS
INFORMATION:
DCS/RSB (RIDS)
Licensing Fee Management Branch
Resident Inspector, RIII
Fhyllis Dunton, Attorney
General's Office, Environmental
Control Division
David Rosenblatt, Governor's
Office of Consumer Services
O
RIII
RIII
RIII
RII
R I
RIII
RII
RIII
ydp
'{WN
LY C -
&
9'
N
Pirtle/ims
M&deda hreed
v,y#4'l
piceley Gilles
Ax
on
ei
Was/87
7
$1/ 31
Enclosu
ntains
MM'd*
SAFEGUARDS INFORMATI0
"
,_ _b,L h x .;6
h -J <v A
UN
uPon separation this
page is peppstroJJed