ML20205F271

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Errata & Addenda Sheet 14,replacing Pages v/vi,3-2,4-3,4-10, 4-15 & 4-16 to, LOCA Analysis Rept for Dresden Units 2,3 & Quad Cities 1,2 Nuclear Power Stations
ML20205F271
Person / Time
Site: Dresden, Quad Cities, 05000000
Issue date: 08/31/1985
From:
GENERAL ELECTRIC CO.
To:
Shared Package
ML20205F242 List:
References
NEDO-24146A-ERR, NEDO-24146A-ERR-14, NUDOCS 8511050275
Download: ML20205F271 (11)


Text

__

t NUCLEA3 ENERJY BUSINESS OPER ATIONS o CENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY g

SAN JOSE, CA LIFORhlA 95125 GEN ER AL $ ELECTRIC APPLICABLE TO:

"'""- NEDO-24146A ERRATA And ADDENDA T. I. E. No. 79NED273 SHEET TITLE LOCA ANALYSIS REPORT FDR 16 N O.

DRESDEN UNITS 2, 3 AND QUAD OATE AUGUST 1985 CITIES 1.2 NUCLEAR POWER STATI tis OE Cometau copise of use app # cable IS$*JE OATE APRIL 1979 publication as specified below.

REFERENCES

' p Yao[Ap'd tfNE , (co R RE: ONSA ADOITIONS)

1. Page v/vi Replace with new page v/vi
2. Page 3-2 Replace with new page 3-2
3. Page 4-3 Replace with new page 4-3
4. Page 4-10 Replace with new page 4-10
5. Page 4-15 Replace w1:h new page 4-15
6. Page 4-16 Replace with new page 4-16 (Change brackets in right-hand margin indicate areas where report has been revised.

R511050275 851029 PDR ADOCK 05000254 P PDR

, , 1 o f .1

NEDO-24146A LIST OF TABLES Title P_ age Table Significant Input Parameters to the Loss-of-Coolant Accident 3-1 1

Summary of Dreak Spectrum Results 4-5 2

LOCA Analysis Figure Summary - Non-Lead Plant 4-6 3

MAPLHGR Versus Average Planar Exposure (7D212 - No Gad.) 4-7 4A' MAPLHGR Versus Average Planar Exposure (7D212L) 4-7 4B '

MAPLHGR Versus Average Planar Exposure (7D230) 4-8 4C MAPLHGR Versus Average Planar Exposure (EEIC - Pu) 4-8 4D MAPLHGR Versus Average Planar Exposure (8D250) 4-9 4E MAPLHGR Versus Average P.lanar Exposure (8D262) 4-9 4F MAPLHGR Versus Average Planar Exposure (8DRB265L) 4-10 4G MAPLHGR Versus Average Planar Exposure (Barrier LTA) 4-10 4H 4I MAPLHGR Versus Average Planar Exposure (P8DRB282) 4-11 4J MAPLHGR Versus Average Planar Exposure (P8DRB265H/BP8DRB265H) 4-11 4K MAPLHGR Versus Average Planar Exposure (P8DRB239) 4-12 MAPLHGR Versus Average Planar Exposure (P8DGB284)* 4-12 4L MAPLHGR Versus Average Planar Exposure (P8DGB263L)* 4-13 4M 4N MAPLHGR Versus Average Planar Exposure (P8DGB263H)* 4-13 ,

MAPLRGR Versus Average Planar Exposure (PSDGB298)* 4-14 40 4P MAPLHGR Versus Average Planar Exposure (P8DRB265L) 4-14 and (P8DGB265L)*

MAPLHGR Versus Average Planar Exposure (BP8DRB283H) 4-15 4Q ~

4R MAPLHGR Versus Average Planar Exposure (BP8DRB282) 4-15 4S MAPLHGR Versus Average Planar Exposure (BP8DRB299) 4-16

  • Barrier fuel for the Barrier Fuel Demonstration Urogram v/vi

NED0-24146A

3. INPUT TO ANALYSIS _

A list of the significant plant input parameters to the LOCA analysis is presented in Table 1.

Table 1 SIGNIFICANT INPUT PARAMETERS TO THE LOSS-OF-COOLANT ACCIDENT ANALYSIS Plant Parameters Core Thermal Power 2578 MWt, which corresponds to 102% of rated power Vessel Steam output 9.96 x 106 lbm/h, which corresponds -

to 102% of rated power Vessel Steam Dome Pressure 1020 psia Rec.irculation Line Break Area 4.18 ft (DBA) ,

for Large Breaks - Suction Number of Drilled Bundles 156 Fuel Parameters:

Peak Technical Initial Specification Design Minimum Linear. Heat Axial Critical Fuel Bundle Generation Kate Peaking Power Fuel Type Geometry (kW/ft) ,

Factor Ratio

  • A. 7D212 - No Gad 7x7 17.5 1.57 1.2 B. 7D212L 7x7 17.5 1.57 1.2 C. 7D230 7x7 17.5 1.57 1.2 D. EEIC - Pu . 7x7 17.5 1.57 1.2 E. dD250 8x8 13.4 1.57 1.2 F. 8D262 8x8 13.4 1.57 1.2 G. 8DRB265L 8x8 13.4 1.57 1.2 H. Barrier LIA 8x8 13.4 1.57 1.2 I. P8DRB282 8x8 13.4 1.57 1.2 J. P8DRB265H/BP8DRB265H 8x8 13.4 1.57 1.2

~

K. P8DRB239 8x8 13.4

.L.57 1.2 To account for the 2% unc.ertainty in bundle power required by Appendix K, the SCAT calculation is performed with an-MCPR of 1.18 (i.e.,1.2 divided by 1.02) for a bundle with an initial MCPR of 1.20, 3-1

NEDO-24146A Table 1 (Continued)

Fuel Parameters: (Continued)

Peak Technical Initial Specification Design Minimum -

Linear Heat Axial Critical Fuel Bundle Generation Rate Peaking Power Fuel Type Geomstry (kW/ft) Factor Ratio L. P8DGB284** 8x8 13.4 1.57 1.2 M. P8DGB263L** 8x8 13.4 1.57 1.2 N. P8DGB263Hi* 8x8 13.4 1.57 1.2

0. P 8DGB298** 8x8 13.4 1.57 1.2 P. P8DRB265L/ 820 13.4 1.57 1.2 P8DGB265L**

Q. BP8DRB283H 8x8 13.4 1.57 1.2 R. BP8DRB282 8x8 13.4 1.57 1.2 S. BP8DRB299 8x8 13.4 1.57 1.2 ,

    • Barrier fuel ter the Barrier Fuel Demonstration Program O

t

=

3-2

  • NEDO-24146A 4.5 RESULTS OF THE CHASTE ANALYSIS This code is used, with suitable inputs from the other codes, to calculate the fuel cladding heatup rate, peak cladding temperature, peak local cladding oxidation, and core-wide metal-water reaction for large breaks. The detailed fuel model in CHASTE considers troasient gap conductance, clad swelling and rupture, and metal-water reaction. Tne empirical core spray heat transfer and channel wetting correlations are built into CHASTE, which solves the transient heat transfer equations for the entire LOCA trancient at a single axial plane in a single fuel assembly. Iterative applications of CHASTE determine the maximum permissible planar power where required to satisfy the requirements of 10CFR50.46 acceptance criteria.

The CHASTE results presented are:

o Peak Cledding Temperature versus time 4 e Peak Cladding Temperature versus Break Area e Peak Cladding Temperature and Peak Local Oxidacion versus Planar .

Average Exposure for the most limiting break size e Maximum Average Planar Heat Generation Rate (RSPLHGR) versus Planar Average Exposure for the most limiting break size A summary of thp analytical results is given in Table 2. Table 3 lists the figures provided for this analysis. The MAPLHGR values for each fuel type .

for D2,3/QC1,2 are presented in Tables 4A through 45. .

4.6 METHODS In the following sections, it will be useful to refer to the methods used to analyze DBA, large breaks, and small breaks. For jet-pump reactors, these are defined as follows:

a. DBA Methods. LAMB / SCAT / SAFE /DBA-REFLOOD/ CHASTE. Break size: DBA.

4-3

NEDO-24146

b. Large Break Methods (LBM). LA'!B/ SCAT / SAFE /non-DBA REFLOOD/ CHASTE.

Break sizes: 1.0 ft < A < DBA.

b. Small Break Methods (SBM). SAFE /non-DBA REFLOOD. Heat transfer coefficients: . nucleate boiling prior to core uncovery, 25 Btu /hr-ft *F after recovery, core spray when appropriate. Peak cladding temperature and peak local oxidation are calculated in non-DBA-REFLOOD. Break sizes: A < l.0 ft .

O 4-4

NEDO-24146A Table 4E MAPLHGR VERSUS AVERAGE PLANAR EXPOSURE PLANT: Dresden 2.3/ Quad Cities 1,2 FUEL TYPE: 8D250 Average Planar-Exposure MAPLEGR PCT 0xidation (mwd /t) (kW/ft) ('F) Fraction 200 11.2 2106 0.024 1,000 11.3 2109 0.024 5,000 11.9 2169 0.029 10,000 12.1 2179 0.029 15,000 12.2 2198 0.031 20,000 12.0 2199 0.031 25,000 11.5 2148 0.027 30,000 10.6 2020 0.017 35,000 9.6 1888 0.011 40,000 9.0 1808 0.008 Table 4F MAPLHGR VERSUS AVERAGE PLANAR EXPOSURE PLANT: Dresden 2,3/ Quad Cities 1,2 FUEL TYPE: 8D262 Average Planar Exposure MAPLHGR PCT 0xidation (mwd /t) (kW/ft) (*F) Fraction 200 11.1 2104 0.024 1,000 11.3 2107 0.024 5,000 11.9 2166 0.029 10,000 12.1 2175 0.029 15,000 12.2 2199 0.031 20,000 12.0 2199 0.032  !

25,000 11.6 2157 0.028 30,000 10.7 2042 0.019 35,000 9.8 1915 0.012 40,000 9.2 1831 0.009 4-9 1

NED0-24146A Table 4G MAPLHGR VERSUS AVERAGE PLANAR EXPOSURE PLANT: Dresden 2,3/ Quad Cities 1,2 FUEL TYPE: 8DRB265L Average. Planar Exposure MAPLHGR PCT 0xidation

-(mwd /t) (kW/ft) ( F) Fraction 200 11.6 2189 0.035 1,000 11.6 2188 0.034

-5,000 11.3 2198' O.034 10,000 11.9 2196 0.033 15,000 11.9 2198 0.034 20,000 11.7 2195 0.034

.25,000 11.3 2154 0.030 30,000 10.7~ 2075 0.023 35,000 10.2 2002 0.018 40,000 9.6 1913 0.013 Table 4H MAPLHGR VERSUS AVERAGE PLANAR EXPOSURE PLANT: . Quad Cities 1 FUEL TYPE: Barrier LTA Average Planar Exposure MAPLHCR PCT 0xidation (mwd /t) (kW/ft) (*F) Fraction 200 11.6 2171 0.032 1,000 11.6 2178 0.033

. 5,000 12.0 2198 0.034 4

10,000 12.1 2195 0.033 15,000 12.0 2200 0.033 20,000 11.7 2187 0.032 25,000 11.0 2115 0.025 30,000 10.5 2029 0.019 40,000 9.3 1913 0.013 45,000 8.6 1840 0.010 ~

, 50,000 8.0 1785 0.009 55,000 7.3- 1730 0.007 .

4-10

NEDO-24146A Table 4Q MAPLHGR VERSUS AVERAGE PLANAR EXPOSURE PLANT: Quad Cities 1,2 FUEL TYPE: BP8DRB283H Average Planar Exposure MAPLHGR PCT 0xidation (mwd /t) (kW/ft) ("F) Fraction 200 11.2 2128 0.028 1,000 11.2 2121 0.028 5,000 11.7 2157 0.030 10,000 12.0 2192 0.033 15,000 12.0 2199 0.033 20,000 11.9 2195 0.033 25,000 11.4 2132 0.027 30,000 10.8 2051 0.038 35,000 10.3 1956 0.031 40,000 9.6 1841 0.009 45,000 9.0 1764 0.007 NOTE: Credit taken for the effects of pre-pressurization of t.he fuel rods.

Table 4R MAPLHGR VERSUS AVERAGE PLANAR EXPOSURE PLANT: Quad Cities 1,2 FUEL TYPE: BP8DRB282 Average Planar Exposure MAPLHGR PCT 0xidation (mwd /t) (kW/ f t) (*F) Fraction 200 11.2 2131 0.029 1,000

  • 11.2 2128 0.028 5,000 11.8 2178 0.032 10,000 12.0 2188 0.032 15,000 12.1 2199 0.033 20,000 11.9 2192 0.033 25,000 11.4 2129 0.027 30,000 10.8 2047 0.038 35,000 10.3 1957 0.031 40,000 9.6 1840 0.009 45,000 8.9 1761 0.007 NOTE: Credit taken for the effects of pre-pressurization of the fuel rode. .

4-15

)

NEDO-24146A Table 4S MAPLHGR VERSUS AVERAGE PLANAR EXPOSURE PLANT: Quad Cities 1&2 FUEL TYPE: BP8DRE299_

Average Planar Exposure MAPLHGR PCT 0xidation (mwd /t) (kW/ft) (*F) Fraction 2d0 10.90 2089 0.025 1,000 11.00 2090 0.025 5,000 11.50 2126 0.027 10,000 12.10 2199 0.033 15,000 12.10 2198 0.033 20,000 11.90 2197 0.033 25,000 11.50 2157 0.030 30,000 11.00 2072 0.049 35,000 10.30 1977 0.035 40,000 9.70 1879 0.021 45,000 9.00 1777 0.007 NOTE: Credit taken for the ef fects of pre-pressurization of the fuel rods. .

a k

4 4-16 y