ML20205F244
| ML20205F244 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Comanche Peak  |
| Issue date: | 03/23/1987 |
| From: | Ellis J Citizens Association for Sound Energy |
| To: | Bloch P, Jordan W, Mccollom K Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel |
| References | |
| CON-#187-2911 OL, NUDOCS 8703310122 | |
| Download: ML20205F244 (2) | |
Text
C A S E==~
19//
214/9h6-9kh6 (CITIZENS ASSN. FOR SOUND ENERGY) 00LHETED March 23, 1987 USNRC Administrative Judge Peter B. Bloch Dr. Kenneth A. McCogmMAR 25 All :04 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 1107 West Knapp Street 4350 East / West Highway, 4th Floor Stillwater, Oklahoma 74075 Bethesda, Maryland 20014 OfflCE F H _ie.y y 00CKEIING A SERVICf.
BRANCH Dr. Walter H. Jordan 881 W. Outer Drive Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37830 Gentlemen:
SUBJECT:
In the Matter of Application of Texas Utilities Generating Company, et al. for An Operating License for Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station Units #1 and #2 (CPSES)
Docket Nos. 50-445 and 50-446-dA Correction to CASE's 3/20/87 Respense to Applicants' Interrogatories to Intervenor (Set No. 1987-5) and Motion for Protective Order -- Page 7 It has just come to CASE's attention that there is an error in subject Response to Applicants' Set 5.
On page 7 (about the middle of the page), reference is made to CASE's 3/20/87 Response to Applicants' Interrogatories to Intervenor (Set No.1987-7) and Motion for Protective Order.
However, we did not get our Response to Set 7 into the mails until today, and some changes were made prior to mailing.
We are therefore attaching a corrected page 7 of our Response to Set 5.
Ilease replace the old page 7 with this new one.
We apologize for any inconvenience this may have caused.
Respectfully submitted, CASE (Citizens Association for Sound Energy)
. ~M bU (dMrs. ) Juanita Ellis President cc:
Service List Attachment l [k O
.-1 from Billie Garde to the Hearing Board; Preliminary Analysis of Issue Specific Action -Plan I.a.4, Agreement Between Drawings and Field Terminations, attached to May 2,1986, letter from Billie Garde to Vincent Noonan) or pleadings with this Board such as the expected summary disposition motions on CPRT adequacy. CASE has also attempted to cooperate by providing Applicants with on-the-spot preliminary assessments by CASE's at-this-time non-testifying expert, Jack Doyle, of Stone & Webster's design ef forts during the March 12 through 14, 1987, meeting. We have also gone beyond what might have been required in responding to Applicants' Set 1987-7 (see especially pages 5 through 10 and page 14 of CASE's 3/23/87 Response to Applicants' Interrogatories to Intervenor (Set No.1987-7) and Motion for Protective Order, which will be sent on Monday, 3/23/87). But for preparing issues for trial or for presentation to the Staff, there is no CASE work on Comanche Peak.
Unlike Applicants, who may prepare analyses both for licensing purposes and for other purposes and who must prepare information to satisfy the Staff and this Board independent of CASE and its contentions, CASE has no information that is not directly tied to the presentation of its case in the various NRC fora. When CASE has a final position, Applicants will be one of the first to know it.
See also Attachment B to CASE's 2/17/87 Notion for Protective Order and Memorandum in Support.
Finally, as to CASE's general objections, the entirety of Set 1987-5 requests CASE to now conduct analyses and reach conclusions with respect to Results Reports that CASE has no intention or capacity for fully pursuing at, this time.
Our limited resources are now focussed on the CPRT plan 7