ML20205C234
| ML20205C234 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 03/03/1999 |
| From: | Travers W NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FOR OPERATIONS (EDO) |
| To: | |
| References | |
| SECY-98-294-C, SECY-99-061, SECY-99-061-01, SECY-99-061-R, SECY-99-61, SECY-99-61-1, SECY-99-61-R, NUDOCS 9904010116 | |
| Download: ML20205C234 (22) | |
Text
- - -
,e....................
RELEASED TOTHE PDR
(
),,
Sh4/9'T Sib)
- 3 8
date initials l
aeesseeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeees
%...../
RULEMAKING lSSUE March 3.1999 (Affirmation)
SECY-99-061 FOR:
The Commissioners FROM:
William D. Travers Executive Director for Operations
SUBJECT:
AMENDMENT TO SECY-98-294: CHANGES TO PARAGRAPH (h) OF 10 CFR PART 50.55a," CODES AND STANDARDS" PURPOSE:
To clarify the staff's position on the applicability of this final rule to combined licenses.
CATEGORY:
This paper covers a routine matter.
BACKGROUND:
During the Commission review of SECY-98-294, it was noted that the final rule as written, could to be interpreted to mean that the certified designs, which were reviewed and approved under IEEE Std. 2791971 and IEEE Std. 603-1980, would now have to meet IEEE Std. 603-1991 and could therefore be considered a potential backfit issue for combined license applicants. The staff agrees that a clarification is needed. This paper provides the proposed revisions.
DISCUSSION:
The staff proposes to revise paragraph (h)(3) of 10 CFR50.55(a). This change requires additional changes to the Attachment 1 to SECY-98-294, "Federa/ Register Notice of amendment: Final Rule" and to Attachment 3, " Regulatory Analysis. These revised versions are attached as Attachments 1 & 2, respectively. The proposed changes are shown in to this amendment to SECY-98-294.
l/
I CONTACT:
Satish Aggarwal 010012 gbb-301 415-6005 D 3 9904010116 990303 1 -
$o6 PDR lh y 0] (1 ~
/
l
. )
RECOMMENDATION:
1.
Approve for publication in the FederalRegisterthe final rule amending 10 CFR '
{
50.55a(h)- Revised version-Attachment 1.
La.-A t-William D. Travers Executive Director for Operations -
Attachments:
- 1. FederalRegisterNotice of Amendment:
Final Rule
- 2. Regulatory Analysis
- 3. Proposed changes l
Commissioners' completed vote sheets / comments should be provided directly to SECY by c.o.b. Thursday, March 18, 1999.
Commission staff office comments, if any, should be submitted to the Commissioners NLT March 11, 1999, with an information copy 1
to SECY.
If the paper is of such a nature that it requires additional review and comment, the Commissioners and the l
Secretariat should be apprised of when comments may be expected.
This paper is tentatively scheduled for affirmation at an open meeting during the week of March 23, 1999.
Please. refer to the appropriate weekly Commission schedule, when published, for a specific date and time.
DISTRIBUTION:
Commissioners OGC OCAA OIG OPA OCA CIO CFO EDO SECY
]
r..
I i
ATTACHMENT 1 t
1
[7590-01-P]
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 10 CFR Part 50 RIN 3150-AF96 Codes and Standards: IEEE National Consensus Standard AGENCY:
Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
ACTION:
Final rule.
SUMMARY
- The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is amending its regulations to incorporate by reference IEEE Std. 603-1991, a national consensus standard for power, instrumentation, and control portions of safety systems in nuclear power plants. Use of IEEE Std. 603-1991 is mandatory for new nuclear power plants and design approvals or certifications and is voluntary for existing nuclear power plants and design cpprovals. This action is necessary to endorse the latest version of this national consensus standard in NRC's regulations because IEEE has withdrawn IEEE Std. 279-197.1.
EFFECTIVE DATE: The final rule ic effective on (30 days after publication in the Federal l
Register). The incorporation by reference of IEEE Std. 603-1991 is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as of (30 days after publication).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Satish K. Aggarwal, Senior Program Manager, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001, Telephone: 301-415-6005, Fax: 501-415-5074, E-mail: SKA@ NRC. GOV.
l 2
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
1 10 CFR Part 50, " Domestic Licensing of Production and Utilization Facilities," $50.55a(h) requires that the protection systems in nuclear power plants meet the requirements stated in l
lEEE Std. 279," Criteria for Protection Systems for Nuclear Power Generating Stations,"in effect on the formal docket date of the application. However, IEEE has withdrawn IEEE Std. 279-1971 and has superseded it with IEEE Std. 603-1991, " Criteria for Safety Systems for Nuclear Power Generating Stations." On April 23,1998 (63 FR 20136), the NRC published a j
proposed rule in the Federal Register that would amend its regulations to incorporate IEEE Std. 603-1991 for power, instrumentation, and control portions of safety systems. Thir action is consistent with the provisions of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995, Pub. L.104-113, which encourages Federal regulatory agencies to consider adopting industry consensus standards as an alternative to de novo agency development of standards affecting an industry. This action is also consistent with the NRC policy of evaluating the latest versions of national consensus standards in terms of their suitability for endorsement by regulations or regulatory guides.
Currently,10 CFR 50.55a(h) specifies that " protection systems" for plants with construction permits issued after January 1,1971, must meet the requirements in IEEE Std. 279 in effect on the formal docket date of the application for a construction permit. IEEE Std. 279-1971 states that a " protection system" encompasses all electric and mechanical devices and circuitry (from sensors to actuation device input terminals) involved in generating those signals associated with the protective function. These signals include those that actuate reactor trip and that, in the event of a serious reactor accident, actuate engineered safety features (ESFs), such as containment isolation, core spray, safety injection, pressure reduction, and air
E
-l i cleaning. " Protective function"is defined in IEEE Std. 279-1971 as "the sensing of one or more variables associated with a particular generating station condition, signal processing, and the initiation and completion of the protective action at values of the variables established in the design bases."
lEEE Std. 603-1991 uses the term " safety systems" rather than " protection systems" to define its scope. A " safety system" is defined in IEEE Std. 603-1991 as "a system that is relied upon to remain functional during and following design basis events to ensure: (i) The integrity of the reactor coolant pressure boundary, (ii) the capability to shut down the reactor and maintain it in a safe shutdown condition, or (iii) the capability to prevent or mitigate the consequences of accidents that could result in potential offsite exposures comparable to the 10 CFR Part 100 guidelines." A " safety function" is defined in IEEE Std. 603-1991 as "one of the processes or conditions (for example, emergency negative reactivity insertion, post-accident heat removal, emergency core cooling, post-accident radioactivity removal, and containment isolation) essential to maintain plant parameters within acceptable lim!ts estaotished for a i
design basis event."
The NRC recognizes that " protection systems" are a subset of " safety systems." Safety system is a broad-based and all-encompassing term, embracing the protection system in addition to other electrical systems. Thus, the term " protection system" is not synonymous with the term " safety system." The final rule is not intended to change the scope of the systems covered in the final safety analysis report (FSAR) for currently operating nuclear power plants.
This final rule sets forth the standards for the design of safety systems for future power plants. The final rule mandates the use of IEEE Std. 603-1991 (including the correction sheet dated January 30,1995) for applications for design approvals pursuant to 10 CFR Part 52, Appendix 0 and design certifications pursuant to 10 CFR Part 52, Subpart B which are filed
E y
- after the effective date of this rule. Although the Westinghouse AP-600 design certification was L filed prior to the effective date of this rule, it has been reviewed to IEEE Std. 603-1991. In
. addition, the final rule mandates the use of the use of IEEE Std. 603-1991 (including the correction sheet dated January 30,1995) for all applications for a construction permit, operating license or combined license filed on or after the effective date of the rule that do not reference a certified design. Any application for a construction permit, operating license or combined license that references a certified design is required to comply with the IEEE standards
- approved in the referenced design certification rule. Current holders of operating licenses may i
continue to meet the requirements for protection systems in their licensing basis, or may j
voluntarily comply with IEEE Std. 603-1991 (including the correction sheet dated January 30, 1995).
l l
Significant Comments on the Proposed Rule The NRC received 16 public comment letters. Copies of these letters are available for j
public inspection, and copying for a fee, at the NRC's Public Document Room. The major issues raised by the commenters and the NRC staff responses to these issues are as follows:
(1) Ambiguity in the definition of '" System-Level Replacements."
Issue The term " system-level replacement"is not clearly defined. The rule would create a duallicensing basis for plant protection systems.
Response: " System-level replacement" for a protection system must involve complete l
replacement from the process sensors to the actuation signals used for the initiation of execute features (e.g., reactor trip system trip breaker, scram solenoid-operated valves, and ESF motive equipment operation). A licensee's current licensing basis applies when defining protection system boundaries. A licensee's protection systems are typically defined and
(-
. discussed in Final Safety Analysis Report Sections 7.1,7.2, and 7.3. The decision to establish and manage a dual licensing basis is voluntary, not mandatory. Reference to system-level replacements has been removed in this final rule because the compliance with the requirements of IEEE Std. 603-1991 is voluntaty for changes to protection systems.
j (2) Referenced Standards, I
lssue: The NRC staff states that the other IEEE standards referenced in IEEE Std.
l 603-1991 will not by themselves become mandatory. However, this position was not restated in the rule itself.
j Response: As a matter of law, the other IEEE standards referenced in IEEE Std. 603-1991 are not rulemaking requirements, inasmuch as (i) Section 50.55a does not contain language explicitly requiring the use of the other IEEE standards referenced in IEEE Std. 603-1991, and (ii) the other IEEE standards referenced in IEEE Std. 603-1991 have not been approved for incorporation by reference by the Office of Federal Register.
(3) Backfit Analysis.
Issue: Incorporating the additional requirements of IEEE Std. 603-1991 as a binding regulation would impose a change to the current licensing basis and constitutes a backfit.
I Response: The NRC has revised the rule to make compliance with the requirements of IEEE Std. 603-1991 voluntary. Current licensees may continue to satisfy NRC regulations by meeting the requirements stated in the edition or revision of IEEE Std. 279 in effect on the i
formal date of their application for a construction permit. Therefore, any further discussion of 1
1 backfit is unnecessary.
4 i
l 1
t 1
J
.6-Consensus Standards -
The National Technology Transfer Act of 1995, Pub. L.104-113, requires that Federal i agencier use tech'nical standards that are developed or adopted by volunta'ry consensus standards bodies unless the use of these standards is inconsistent with applicable law or
'othenvise impractical.- In this final rule, the NRC is using the following voluntary consensus standards, IEEE Std.- 603-1991, including the correction s' eet dated January 30,1995. No attemative voluntary consensus standard (s) were identified for use in this final rule.
Finding of No EnvironmentalImpact: Availability of Environmental Assessment The NRC has determined under the National Environmer;tal Policy Act of 1969, as amended, and the NRC's regulations in subpart A of 10 CFR Part 51, that because this final
- rule would not be a major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment, an environmentalimpact statement is not required. The NRC has prepared an environmental assessment supporting this finding of no significant environmental impact.
The NRC had sent a copy of the environmental assessment and a copy of the Federal Registernotice to every State liaison officer and requested their comments on tr.e environmental assessment. No comments were received. The environmental assessment is available for inspection, and copying for a fee, at the NRC Public Document Room,2120 L Street, NW., Washington, D.C.. Also, the NRC has committed itself to complying in all its actions with Presidential Executive Order 12898," Federal Actions To Address Environmental Justice in' Minority Populations and Low-income Populations" (February 11,1994). Therefore, the NRC also has determined that there are no disproportionate, high, and adverse impacts on i
l i
i a
f::
. minority and low-income populations. The NRC uses the following working definition of
- environmental justice: Environmental justice means the fair treatment and meaningful involvement of all people-regardless of race, ethnicity, culture, income, or educational g
level-with respect to the development, impleinentation, and enforcement of environmental laws, regulations, and policies.
Paperwork Reduction Act Statement l
l l
This final rule does not contain a new or amended information <c.' etion requirement subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501, et seq.), 3xisting requirements were approved by the Office of Management and Budget, Approval No. 3150-0011.
l Public Protection Notification If an information collection does not display a currently valid OMB control number, the I
NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, the information collection.
l Regulatory Analysis l
l
' The NRC has prepared a regulatory analysis that shows this amendment does not impose any new requirements or costs on current licensees because compliance with the requirements of IEEE Std. 603-1991 is voluntary. The regulatory analysis is available for i
l
w
. l inspection, and copying for a fee, in the NRC Public Document Room,2120 L Street NW.,
Washington, DC.
Regulatory Flexibility Certification 4
As required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (5 U.S.C. 605(b)), the NRC certifies that this rule does not have a significant economic impact on small entities. This rule affects only the operation of nuclear power plants. The companie; that own these plants do not fall within the scope of the definition of "small entities" stateJ in the Regulatory Fiexibility Act or the small business size standards adopted by the NRC (10 CFR 2.810). Because these companies are dominant in their service areas, this rule does not fall within the purview of the act.
Backfit Analysis The final rule requires applicants for new design approvals and new design certifications to comply with IEEE Std. 603-1991 (including the correction sheet dated January 30,1995).
The final rule also requires applicants for new construction permits, new operating licenses, and combined licenses that do not reference a certified design to comply with IEEE Std. 603-1991 l
(including the correction sheet dated January 30,1995). Current holders of operating licenses
)
l may continue to meet the requirements for protection systems in their licensing basis, or may j
voluntarily comply with IEEE Std. 603-1991 (including the correction sheet dated January 30, 1995).
m.=
-a 9
The backfit rule was not intended to apply to regulatory actions that change expectations of prospective applic, ants and, therefore, the backfit rule does not apply to the portion of the rule applicable to new construction permits, new operating licenses, new design approvals, new design certifications, and combined licenses that do not reference a certified design. Because the IEEE Std. 603-1991 is voluntary for licensees of currently operating plants, this rule does not constitute a backfit with respect to those plants.
'1 The NRC staff believes that newer consensus standards reflect progress and the current " state of the practice" of the technology. Specifically, IEEE Std. 603-1991 is a major improvement over IEEE Std. 279-1971. IEEE Std. 279-1971 provides basic criteria for
'l protection systems, which remain unchanged in IEEE Std. 603-1991. If a licensee proposes to replace an existing analog protection system with a digital system, IEEE Std. 279-1971 provides no specific guidance. Therefore, licensees are likely to consider the guidance in IEEE Std. 603-1991 and other standards that address digital system design. The NRC staff encourages the use of digital technology and encourages the use of new standards such as IEEE Std. 603-1991. Thus, the final rule provides an option for complying with the new standard for changes to existing power and instrumentation and control portions of protection systems. This is not considered a backfit because the adoption of IEEE Std. 603-1991 would be voluntary.
L In summary, the NRC has determined that the backfit rule,10 CFR 50.109, does not apply to this rule because it does not impose any backfits as defined in 10 CFR 50.109(a)(1).
j Therefore, a backfit analysis has not been prepared for this final rule.
u l
. l Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act In accordance with th'e Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 L
the NRC has determined that this action is not a major rule and has verified this determination with the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs of OMB.
l List of Subjects in 10 CFR Part 50 Antitrust, Classified information, Criminal penalties, Fire protection, Incorporation by l
reference, Intergovemmental relations, Nuclear power plants and reactors, Radiation protection, Reactor siting criteria, and Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
For the reasons stated in the preamble and under the authority of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, the Energy Reorgani.. ion Act of 1974, as amended, the Energy Reorganization Act of 1974, as amended, and 5 U.S.C. 552 and 553, the NRC is adopting the
. following amendment to 10 CFR Part 50.
l
[
I PART 50-DOMESTIC LICENSING OF PRODUCTION AND UTILIZATION FACILITIES
- 1. The authority citation for Part 50 continues to read as follows:
AUTHORITY: Secs.102, in,104,105,161,182,183,186,189,68 Stat. 936,937, 938,948,953,954,955,956,' as amended, sec. 234,83 Stat.1244, as amended (42 U.S.C.
2132,2133,2134,2135,2201,2232,2233,2236,2239,2282); secs. 201, as amended,202, i
206, 88 Stat.1242, as amended, 1244,1246 (42 U.S.C. 5841,5842,5846).
Section 50.7 also issued under Pub. L.95-601, sec.10,92 Stat. 2951 (42 U.S.C.
5851). Section 50.10 also issued under secs. 101,185,68 Stat. 955 as amended (42 U.S.C.
2131,2235), sec.102, Pub. L.91-190,83 Stat. 853 (42 U.S.C. 4332). Sections 50.13, and 50.54(dd), and 50.103 also issued under sec.108,68 Stat. 939, as amended (42 U.S.C.
2138), Sections 50.23,50.35, 50.55, and 50.56 also issued under sec.185,68 Stat. 955 (42 U.S.C. 2235), Sections 50.33a,50.55a and Appendix Q also issued under sec.102, Pub. L.91-190,83 Stat. 853 (42 U.S.C. 4332). Sections 50.34 and 50.54 also issued under sec. 204, 88 Stat.1245 (42 U.S.C. 5844).- Sections 50.58,50.91, and 50.92 also issued under Pub. L.97-415,96 Stat.: 2073 (42 U.S.C. 2239). Section 50.78 also issued under sec.122,68 Stat.
939 (42 U.S.C. 2152). Sections 50.80-50.81 also issued under sec.184,68 Stat. 954, as amended (42 U.S.C. 2234). Appendix F also issued under sec.187,68 Stat. 955 (42
)
U.S.C. 2237).
- 2. In s 50.55a, paragraph (h) is revised to read as follows:
{ 50.55a Codes and standards.
l
rg
't l(h) Protection cnd Safety Systems. (1) IEEE Std. 603-1991, including the correction
. sheet dated January 30,1995, which is referenced in paragraphs (h)(2) and (h)(3) of this j
section, is approved for incorporation by reference by the Director of the Office of the Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR Part 51. Copies of IEEE Std. 603-1991 may be purchased from the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Service Center, 445 Hoes Lane, Piscataway, NJ 08865. The standard is also available for inspection at the NRC Library,11545 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Md; and at the Office of the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., Suite 700, Washington, D.C. lEEE Std. 279, which is
- referenced in paragraph (h)(2) of this section, was approved for incorporation by reference by l
l the Director of the Office of the Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR Part 51. Copies of IEEE Std. 279 are also available as indicated for IEEE Std. 603-1991.
(2) Protection systems. For nuclear power plants with construction permits issued after
. Januaty 1,1971, but be' ore (insert the effective date of this document), protection systems must meet the requirements stated in either IEEE Std. 279, " Criteria for Protection Systems for Nuclear Power Generating Stations," or in IEEE Std. 603-1991, " Criteria for Safety Systems for Nuclear Power Generating Stations," and the c'orrection sheet dated January 30,1995. For nuclear power plants with construction permits issued before January 1,1971, protection systems must be consistent with their licensing basis or may meet the requirements of IEEE Std. 603-1991 and the correction sheet dated January 30,1995.
. (3) Safety systems. Applications filed on or after [lNSERT EFFECTIVE DATE OF
~ RULE] for preliminary and final design approvals (10 CFR Part 52, Appendix O), design i
certifications, and construction permits, operating licenses and combined licenses that do not reference a final design approval or design certification, must meet the requirements for safety I
l_
. systems in IEEE Std. 603-1991 and the correction sheet dated January 30,1995.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this day of
.1999.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Annette L. Vietti-Cook, Secretary of the Commission.
i L
4 1
1 1
1 1
ATTACHMENT 2
f l
REGULATORY ANALYSIS
- 1. Problem:
l The NRC regulations currently incorporate by reference an obsolete national consensus standard, which tvas withdrawn by lEEE. This standard, which was replaced by IEEE Std. 603-1991 (and the correction sheet dated January 30,1995), represents a significant improvement i
i over IEEE Std. 279-1971. The latest standard provides clear explanations to the general criteria stated in the earlier standard. NRC proposes to update 10 CFR 50.55a(h) to reference IEEE Std. 603-1991 in order to reflect current technology.
- 2. Alternative Accroaches:
The following are alternative approaches to the action described in the final rule:
(i)
Take no action.
(ii)
Prescribe a detailed approach.
l The first alternative, taking no action, would mean that the NRC would continue to rely upon an obsolete standard. This will not utilize the current technology and will not benefit from the operating experience gained over the past 20 years. This option is not acceptable, because the criteria in IEEE Std. 603-1991 will provide a means of promoting safe practices for design and evaluation of future nuclear power plants' safety systems performance and reliability.
The second alternative, prescribing a detailed approach, would impose an unmanageable burden on the NRC technical staff, particularly in an era of declining budgets and fewer resources. It also overlooks the benefits derived from the consensus process and the technical experience and expertise in the IEEE technical committees. Therefore, this alternative is not acceptable.
- 3. Value andimosct:
IEEE Std. 603-1991 would apply to: (i) new design approvals and new design certifications; and (ii) new construction permits, new operating licenses, and combined licenses that do not reference a certified design. Current holders of operating licenses may continue to meet the requirements for protection systems in their licensing basis, or may voluntarily comply with IEEE Std. 603-1991 (including the correction sheet dated January 30,1995).
Issuing the proposed amendment is consistent with the NRC policy of evaluating the latest versions of national consensus standards in terms of their suitability for endorsement. NRC regulations or regulatory guides or both should reflect current technology.
It is in the interest of public health and safety for the NRC to adopt IEEE Std. 603-1991. By presenting clearer guidance on the criteria for safety systems and including criteria on related issues, IEEE Std. 603-1991 offers an improvement to health and safety by reducing the potential for misunderstanding ine criteria for safety systems.
I It is expected that the final rule will reduce the probability or consequences of an accident.
r-2-
For operating nuclear power plants, the final rule provides an option for complying with the new standard for changes to existing power and instrumentation and control portions of protection systems. This is not considered a backfit because the adoption of IEEE Std. 603-1991 is voluntary.
4.
Conclusion:
Endorsement of IEEE Std. 603-1991 addresses the stated problems and minimizes the NRC staff resources that would be expected in developing design certification "from scratch" for new advanced nuclear power plants..This action is consistent with the provisions of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995, Pub. L.104-113.
- 5. DecisionalRationale:
On the basis of no impact and highest value for problem solution capability, the alternative of endorsing IEEE Std. 603-1991 as presented in the final rule has been chosen. Further, the i
existence of already approved staff guidance on digital system implementation provided in Standard Review Plan, NUREG-0800, Chapter 7 as well as endorsement of IEEE Std.603-1991 in Regulatory Guide 1.153 provides documentation of the staff expectations for the design of digital system modifications, and, therefore, makes the recommended alternative for the final rule appropriate.
j
L ATTACHMENT 3 I
I
!t i
- Proposed changes to RIN 3150-AF96
' ATTACHMENT 1 of SECY-98-294:
1.
SUMMARY
- On p.1, delete second sentence, and substitute tbc iollowi.z;i Use of IEEE Std. 603-1991 is mandatory for new nuclear power plants
-and design approvals or certifications and is voluntary for existing nuclear power plants and design approvals.
2.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On p.3, delete last paragraph, and substitute the following:
This final rule sets forth the standards for the design of safety systems for future power plants. The final rule mandates the use of IEEE Std. 603-1991 (including the correction sheet dated January 30,1995) for applications for design approvals pursuant to 10 CFR Part 52, Appendix O ar.d design certifications pursuant to 10 CFR Part 52, Subpart B which are filed after the effective date of this rule. Although the Westinghouse AP-600 design certification was filed prior to the effective date of this rule, it has been reviewed to IEEE Std. 603-1991. In addition, the final rule mandates the use of the use of IEEE Std. 603-1991 (including the correction sheet dated January 30,1995) for all applications for a construction permit, operating license or combined license filed on or l
after the effective date of the rule that do not reference a certified design.
Any application for a construction permit, operating license or combined
' license that references a certified design is required to comply with the IEEE standards approved in the referenced design certification rule.
Current holders of operating licenses may continue to meet the l
requirements for protection systems in their licensing basis, or may voluntarily comply with IEEE Std. 603-1991 (including the correction sheet dated January 30,1995).
3.
BACKFIT ANALYSIS: On p. 8, delete the first and second paragraphs, and substitute the following:
The final rule requires applicants for new design approvals and new design certifications to comply with IEEE Std. 603-1991-(including the l
correction sheet dated January 30,1995). The final rule also requires applicants for new construction permits, new operating licenses, and combined licenses that do not reference a certified design to comply with IEEE Std. 603-1991 (including the correction sheet dated January 30, 1995). Current holders of operating licenses may continue to meet the l
requirements for protection systems in their licensing basis, or may voluntarily comply with IEEE Std. 603-1991 (including the correction sheet dated January 30,1995).
The backfit rule was not intended to apply to regulatory actions that change expectations of prospective applicants and, therefore, the backfit
)
4-6 rule does not apply to the portion of the rule applicable to new construction permits, new operating licenses, new design approvals, new design certifications, and combined licenses that do not reference a certified design. Because the IEEE Std. 603-1991 is voluntary for ~
licensees of currently operating plants, this rule does not constitute a backfit with respect to those plants.
4.
RULE: On p.12, delete existing language and substitute the following:
(3) Safety systems. Applications filed on or after (INSER T EFFECTIVE DATE OF RULE] for preliminary and final design approvals (10 CFR Part 52, Appendix O), design certifications, and construction permits, operating licenses and combined licenses that do not ref erence a final design approval or design certification, must meet the requirements for safety systems in IEEE Std. 603-1991 and the correction sheet dated January 30, 1995.
ATTACHMENT 3 of SECY-98-294:
5.
REGULATORY ANALYSIS: On p.1, delete first paragraph under"3. Value and Impact," and substitute the following:
IEEE Std. 603-1991 would apply to: (i) new design approvals and new design certifications; and (ii) new construction permits, new operating licenses, and combined licenses that do not reference a certified design.
Current holders of operating licenses may continue to meet the requirements for protection systems in their licensing basis, or may voluntarily comply with IEEE Std. 603-1991 (including the correction sheet dated January 30,1995).
l i