ML20205C154

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Requests Planned Action & Schedule for Resolving Love Recommendation That Facilities Be Inspected Re Util Policy of Designating Interim Lead Auditors When Individuals Not Qualified to Be Certified as Lead Auditors
ML20205C154
Person / Time
Site: Byron  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 09/11/1983
From: Davis A
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To: Spessard R
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
Shared Package
ML20205C137 List:
References
FOIA-88-345 NUDOCS 8810260408
Download: ML20205C154 (7)


Text

1 ),' o n 6

=

i UNITED ST ATES y i'((

.a re s

/

'o, NUCLE AR REGULATORY COMMISSICN

(

9,.T, / *

[ME i

REGloN til

?

n,aocstvett aoao

/,

g

,e g ctovs. itu~ois soin g

n-/6 C y/

1 September 11, 1983 k.

nn ssd ~ ; 7 i

MEMORANDUM FOR:

R. L. Spessard, Director, Division of Engineering FROM:

A. Bert Davis, Deputy Regional Administrator

SUBJECT:

INSPECTION EVALUATION, BYRON 83-16 Mr. Love recensended that all CECO facilities and the home of fice be inspected ASAP regarding CECO's policy of designating interim lead auditors when the individuals are not qualified to be certified as Icad auditors.

Mr. Williams concurred with Mr. Love.

Please let me know your planned action and schedule for resolving this matter.

hf A. Bert Davis Deputy Regional Administracor cc:

IERP Membera Rf S. Love PC. C. Williams 6010260400 000920 FOIA ppR PDR MURPHY 00-34D

'o

[}

o

1. FQ W ON August 2,

d Letter No. 3 TO:

W. J. Shewski

SUBJECT:

Request for Interim Lea'd'Euditor Certification

I P. J. Macuiba I request that Mr. P. J. Macuiba be considered for certification as an Interim Lead Auditor.

The basis for this request is as follows:

1.

Participation in eight (8) audits including six (6) as an auditor.

2.

Completion of a one (1) day auditor training course.

'3.

Participation in an ASME Survey as a utility representative.

--4.

Member of the American Welding Society (AWS).

5.

QA training including the following areas:

MT/PT, RT, UT, Visual Inspection.

In addition, Mr. Macuiba, has served as an instructor and has presented Codes and Standards and Weld Training courses for QA

() Department personnel.

He has also demonstrated sound technical judgement and tenacity in his past work.

Based on present education, experience, etc., Mr. Macuiba has accumulated eight (8) points to date.

In addition, he has accuculated fifteen (15) months of QA experience and airo three (3) months during the summer internship program.

Based on the above, I feel that Mr. Macuiba is qualified to assume the responsibility of Interim Lead Auditor.

Y-

?h r/F 2

\\

M. A. Stanish QA Superintendent 4

Byron S,qa. tion,,

, 4,,

MAS:ej:0083L uu e M

y G.F. Marcus/A., StfTler [*jo #IMM ec:

R.G. Gruber f/q' /4 t, p

M.A. Stanish Q

y Rzn-tv-ser Dh

e 4

INTERIM LEAD AUDITOR (S) - An interim lead auditor does not have the necessary 10 points, but lacks only experience and is expected to meet the 10 point requirement in less then a year.

Individuals will be designated as interim lead auditors based on demonstrated capability; participation in at least 5 audits as qualified auditor; and documented justificacion by a supervisor.

The justification will be approved / denied by the manager of Quality Assurance.

2081Q

\\

CO?Od.ONVEALTH EDISON COMPANY _CUALITY_ ASSURANCE DEPAMMDf?

LEAD AUDIICR CUALI FICATION FORM C

AS REGUI E) bY M45.2.23 Appendix B RICORD OF LEAD AUDITOR CUALTTICATIONS NAME DATE E FF E CT8VE RAY G.

G RU E$ E R 3-17-62 ANSI N45 2.23 Paragraph 231 CUALIFICATION PCINT REQUIREMDfTS I fl **(10.POIJrS M3N.)

if 11 2.3.1.1 EmCATION - University /F>erree/Da te -

  • I. Pt). Vax.

IIT*,( ($ CS,~{)(), F /g [gL(

1.

Undergraduate Level 7 C' :o

3

\\

q$ j r pjj l [

2.

Graduate Level 23,i.2_

EXrulIUiCE - CowanY/Dete S

'V

' b 9 '?tS.6 MLV Technical (0-5 pts.) and CCce/

l-g 1sl fic#r g--

Nuclear Industry (0 1 t.), or

{

Quality Assvrance (0-2, or Auditing (0 1 pt.)

2. 3.1. 3 PROFESSIONAL ACCCMPLISLMDC - Cert /Date

- 2 pts. Max.

1.

P.E.

-2.

Society 231.i.

MANAGEMI.NT - Justification / Evaluator Data

- ? Pts. Max.

F.xplains h*@h4.w.ph M r rdsw fb Y

M

b ps' Evaluated bvf ('ime & Title) b

(

3 */

D N

t i

Nya-M TCTAI. POINTS IO 232 AUDIT CC:c4JNICATION SKILLS g

Evaluated by: (Nase &Titleh

%.p, g he~y Date a.3,3 AUDIT TRAINING CCUESE.i Course Title er Topic Date

1. A U D I O - V I S U Al.-

3-/c.-dl

2. A V D tT' 7*R A141 AJ A 5 2.5-8 f P. 3. 4.

AUDIT FAAll4IrATION 1Acation Audit Date

1. BYRON M V O T*d A.

6 M0 10 21 91 2.SYC04 W AT' Fs (E 4 D g, 8 Cl 11 - 12 8 t 3.GYC04 de R %.

6 567 11 81 4.BYRod

$1ATFi dLD G - s ?.- 4 l-lT.-$2.

5 6Y C 0 6)

$ I L.

6-BL ?

2.11-d t-2.3.5 EXAMUiATIcN Famsed A<

1 3-AWnf Date 5.2 AUDItca ctJALITICATION CIATIFIED BY Date certified (Signature and Title)

/d%/16m hi /k,GA 3 /7 f t.

i

[

32 AN?dAL EVAUJATION

(,,

(Signature and Cate)

<m

~

i l

POL OY STATEMENT l '-

i INTERIM LEAD AUDITOR (S) - An interim lead auditor does

];

not have the aecessary 10 points, but lacks only j

i experience and is expected to meet the 10 point

{

requirement in less than a year.

Individuals will be designated as interim lead auditors based on demonstrated ~

l capability; participation in at least 5 audits as l

qualified auditor; and documented justification by a

\\

l supervisor.

Audit checklists and reports by such interim I

j appointees shall be formulated under the supervision of j

at least a Supervisor and also approved by a Supervisor.

i 1

The justification will be approved / denied by the Manager j

of Quality Assurance.

l 1

W. J. Showski j

i i

1 1

'I

\\

ss.io O

o i

1 July 20, 1983 BRD #9141 l

TO '.

J.

S.

Bitel l

SUBJECT:

Interia Lead Auditors at Braidwood Station l

RE:

J.

S.

Bitel Letter of June 30. 1983 As required by your letter of June 30. 1983, a review was made r

of audits conducted by M.

J.

Callahan at Braidwood while acting as an Intecim Lead Auditor The results of this review are listed on Attachment A.

I Othe:: than the comments noted, the audit reports, objective evidence and audit deficiency closeouts were in compliance with CEC 9 l

auditing practice 3 in effect at the time of the audits.

Detailed l

cc ment shoots have been included in each audit report and l

ch Jklists have been annotated as required.

l M.

A.

Gorski l

C.

A.

Engineer Braidwood Station l'OR INFORMATION ONLY l

l f. $ W //f f*,/c 5.

C. Hunsader/

Q.

A.

Supervisor Braidwood Station p

7*-

v-

,r.

BCil/ MAG /m)v (0910A) d O ),'

I:

P i

., I,(h,

g f

j+

i

,1 f 'r i :i l

L1 E cet

o. A.

Pile 53.1o /.

u p

J Ou.oa L...

Jc. c c La '

b "

(',,Ej Ql.; TA i'.[

-y

d i

s V

t l

t

1

?

l BRD #9848 1

ATTACHPEhT A Rpt Autit Osie Auditee Lead Auditor Reviewed By Comuments GA-20-7S-50 09-22-73 Station Construction M. J. Callahan M. A. Gorski Minor checklist change.

j CA-20-78-64 12-21-M Reliance Truck Co.

M. J. Callahan M. A. Gorski No changes.

QA-20-73-4 8 I(M)5-78 P.T.L.

M. J. Callahan M. A. Gorski One Item on checklist has InsufficIw t objective evidence. This Itan was adequately co.'ered on a later audit.

CA-20 ~e-74 44-28-78 H. H. Robertson M. J. Callahan M. A. Gorski One Item marked acceptable i

should have been deficient. This item

~

(records storage) has been corrected since startup (early 1980).

1 04-20-78-55 I1-06-78 Station Construction M. J. Callahan S. M. Jaquez Minor checklist notettons.

CA-20-78-70 32-05-13 G. K. Newberg M. J. Callahan S. M. Jaquez One Iten on the checklist had Insuf ficient object!se evidence. This Itasi was adequately covered on a later audit. One on item 3

1.. -.,.

'* [, * %s earked acceptable shoold

, [<

8

.J.

$r.e have been deficient. This

+l.

h

  • ,* f It r;(records storage) has J.0

- correc,ed si co o.aa. -

'a t c,. ;,p; yxq g;,:

startup (eerly 1530).

FGil d.l?sJt.W. TION ONLY

- Tc'.,.;.,, s.i

v. n d
  • ] ' h ' # #

p[

b d

!}

[

~.. _.. _. _.

E

-