ML20204J840
| ML20204J840 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Seabrook  |
| Issue date: | 10/19/1988 |
| From: | George Thomas PUBLIC SERVICE CO. OF NEW HAMPSHIRE |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION & RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (ARM) |
| References | |
| NYN-88141, NUDOCS 8810250262 | |
| Download: ML20204J840 (20) | |
Text
-
d George S. Thomas vice hedderd Nuclear hodoenon f
PA2C Servlos of New Hampshire N:w Hampshiro Yankee Division NYN-88141 October 19, 1988 i
United States Nuclear Regulatory Comission Washingten DC 20555 i
t Attention:
Document Control Desk
References:
a) Facility Operating License NPF-56, Docket No. 50-443 b)
PSNH Letter NYN-87121 dated October 19, 1987, "Changes to Seabrook Station Operational Quality Assurance Program,'
G. S. Thomas to USNRC c)
PSNH Letter NYN-88047 dated April 11, 1988, ' Clarification of Changes to the Seabrook Station Operational Quality j
Assurance Program,' G. S. Thomas to USNRC
Subject:
Changes to Seabrook Station Operational Quality Assurance Program Gentlemen In accordance with the requirements of 10 CFR 50.54(a) and 10 CFR 50.71, enclosed are changes to the description of the Operational Quality Assurance Program for Seabrook Station.
This revised description is provided in the
)
form of marked-up FSAR pages which also incorporate those changes previously 1
submitted by References (b) and (c).
These changes are administrative in nature and do not reduce the commitments in or the effectiveness of the l
l New Hampshire Yankee Operational Quality Assurance Program. FSAR Section 17.2 j
will be updated in a future amendment to the Seabrook Station FSAR.
I l
Should you have any questions regarding these changes, please contact
(
l Mr. Jeffrey Warnock at (603) 474-9574, extension 3370.
f j
Very truly yours i
l AVf 1
Georg S. Thomas i
Enclosure l
lkO2 g g8 3
P.O. Box 300. Seabrook. NH 03874. Telephone (603) 474 9574
pnitsd States Nuclest Rsgulatory Commission Octobsr 19, 1988 Attention: Document Control Desk Page 2 cc Mr. William T. Russell Regional Administrator Region I United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission 475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19406 Mr. Victor Nerses, Acting Director Project Directorate I-3 Division of Reactor Projects United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555 Mr. David G. Ruscitto NRC Senior Resident Inspector Seabrook Station Seabrook, NH 03874 l
l l
y -
+ -
O 4
e e
O ENCLOSURE TO NYN-88141 i
I I
L L
i
SB 1 & 2 Amandmsne 58 FSAR April 1986 17.2 OUALITY ASSURANCE DURING THE OPERATIONS PHASE It is the policy of New Hampshire Yankee (NHY) that all activities associated with Seabrook Station, which may affect the safety of the general public, shall be performed in a manner that provides a level of quality commensurate with the activity. To implement this policy during the operation of Seabrook Station, a series of management controls has been instituted which control the quality of work perf ormed on, and materials used.in, safety related structures, sys tems, and components. The NHY Operational Quality Assurance Program (0QAP), described below, and its associated management controls for materials and activities meet the applicable regulscory requirenents of 10 CFR l
50, Appendix B and is the program established to meet this policy.
Es I
Individuals responsible for the performance of activities affecting struc-g, tures, systems, and components at Seabrook Station are responsible to be familiar with and to implement the applicable requirements as defined in the OQAP.
17.2.1 Organization 17.2.1 1 Program Resoonsibility The ultimate responsibility for operation, including maintenance, modification and refueling, of Seabrook Station rests with New Hampshire Yankee. The A/8/Se*:: "ice President has been designated as the responsible corporate l
officer.
As such, he has the authority and responsibility to develop and 53 55 implement the Operational Quality Assurance Program, hereinaf ter referred to as the Program or OQAP.%s.-Wo 6 'oeh#f du o-*<* d* /"'f 8 7** / *w a/ 9 55' dA ek G e % s.<len t, c% iar *
- a 'f, h s m h'f,"*J LliNP% re.* s us d 'sd " " F:* S C ' " " ' I ^ d The Program, which is presented in this and the following sections, is expressed as an outline of the assignments, actions and procedures that, taken together, will result in proper management and operation of activities at Seabrook Station.
Through the established organization, verification of conformance to established quality requirements is implemented by individuals or groups not having direct responsibilities for the work being verified. Those individuals performing the verifications and other quality related functions have direct access to =anagement levels in the organization which assures the ability tot o
Identify quality problems o
Initiate, recommend, or provide solutinns through designated channels 53 o
Verify implementation of solutions 0
17.2-1 l
SB 1 & 2 FSAR The Vice President trf-Engineering censi and Quality Programs will mediate ll a
disputes arising within the OQAP.
Where disagreement persists, the matter may M
I for final resolution.
lA be appealed to the Ex: ~,'r'.R President A4 y
17.2.1.2 Delegation of Authority and Assignment of Responsibility Mq The Senix '.ies President, while retaining full responsibility andl l
a.
the overall authority, has delegated the necessary authority and 55 M has assigned renonsgility for the Program to the Vice President of Engineering Licensing and Quality Programs.
He has assigned the l
Nuclear Quality er the responsibility to manage the M
programmatic aspects of the OQAP.
b.
Various operational support services have been delegated to the Nuclear Services Division cf the Yankee Atomic Electric Company (YAEC). The Quality Assurance Department of YAEC establishes the programs and practices necessary to er sure that such services meet appropriate quality standards.
In adAition, NHY reviews YAEC doecumentation, audits YAEC performance, performs an annual management assessment of YAEC QA activities, and coordinates the work to assure a quality work product for the Seabrook project.
5s M S 17.2.1.3 Organizational Structure NHY Organization The NHY organizational structure discussed below is shown on l
Figure 17.2-1.
es a.
Vice Presidenta4. Engineering, and Quality Programs TheVicePresidentgEngineering,hn and Quality Programs is responsible for NHY Engineering, Independent Review Team, Independent Safety Engineering Group Reliability and Safety Licensing and the construction and operational QA programs., He has j
been delegated the responsibility to develop and implement the Operational Quality Assurance Program (0QAP).
In order to l 58 Sq l3 accomplish this, he is assisted by the Nuclear Quality Manager and Engineering Manager whose functions are described below.
5 3
1.
Nuclear Quality Group (N00)
The Nuclear Quality Manager has overall responsibility for assuring that the Operational Quality Assurance Program is effectively implemented by all organizations performing work on systems and equipment within the scope of the OQAP.
M 17.2-2
=_
SB 1 & 2 FSAP 6
o Identifies quality problems and evaluates their extent and safety implications.
o Recommends,,srovides or initiates solutions to identified quality problems.
I o Verifies implementation of-approved solutions to such l
problems.
o Administers the audit, surveillaace and inspection programs of the NHY organization.
l% 51 o Evaluates and reports on the effectiveness of the Program, and identifies trends in quality performance.
I i
o Refers to the Vice President Engineerin and Quality Programs for mediation, cases whers n.
m unable to establish mutual agreement with, or between,
- 5) ;
other organizations involved in the implementation of the Program.
o Is Chairman of the Nuclear Safety Audit and Review J
Committee (NSARC).
A n
3 The Nuclear Quality Group also provides the on-site verifica-tion and assessment of the Program implementation.
l 54 The Nuclear Quality Manager receives prior notification of l
l SORC rueetings, and a representative of the NQG participates
%5L.
on a regular basis. The Nuclear Quality Group is on distri-l bution for pertinent meeting notices, correspondence and 54 I
information, and a representative at;: ends any meeting which
[
g appears appropriate. Nuclear Quality Group personnel 1
i routinely attend and participate in work schedule and status meetings to assure that they are kept abreast of day-to-day 54 i
work assignments throughout the plant, and that there is adequate QA/QC coverage relative to procedural and inspection j
controls, acceptance criteria, and C A/QC staf fing and j
qualification of personnel to carry att QA/QC assignments.
1 The Nuclear Quality Group consists of the Quality Control, the Quality Assurance, the Audit and Evaluation and the QA j
i Surveillance Sections. The Quality Assurance Section j
]
contains expertise in the areas of quality engineering. The i
l Audit and Evaluation Section contains expertise in quality lg assurance auditing.
The Quality Control Section contains g
i expertise in the areas of electrical, mechanical, and instrumentation and control. The QA Surveillance Section contains i
expertise in construction installation requirements and performs programmatic surveillances. The NQ sections report directly tu the
)
Nuclear Quality Manager.
p i
l I
17.2-4 9
1
SBA & 2 i
FSAR l
The Nuclear Quality Manager and his staff embody the neces-sary technical and professional qualifications and exper-7 tise, and are responsible to:
j i
(a) Assist the Training Manager in providing QA Training for b3Y personnel.
(b) Train, retrain, and qualify personnel in the specific QA and QC skills and techniques required to perform i
audits, surveillances and inspections of OQAP related work associated with NHY operations, maintenance and l
other activities.
(c) Honitor and review the conduct of quality control activities and the performance of inspections.
4 1
(d) Perform QC inspection functions not delegated to other groups / organizations.
(e) Perform audits and surveillances of Station programs and activities within the scope of the OQAP.
(f) Review and audit to assure that contractors or service agencies performing on-site work, within the scope of the OQAP, employ adequate QA programs and implementing procedures.
j 4
j (g) Exercise stop-work authority.
s 2.
Engineering Manager
'" "N The Engineering Manager reports to tn Vice President' engineering Engineer-ingfandQualityPrograms.
He is responsible for NHY programs, configuration management engineering studies, safety evaluations and environmental j
c _ _ _.
l tamey utton,
.se/W t b.
Vice President - Nuclear Production The Vice President Nuclear Production is responsible for the 1
i operation and operational support of Seabrook Station. To neist him I
)
in the accomplishment of these responsibilities, he has the Seabrook i
Station Manager, the Production Services Manager, th: W el--
'--M ee j
H - ;
, the Training Manager, and the Regulatory Services Manager j
reporting directly to him.
1 i
1.
The Production Services group provides support to the Vice i
President - Nuclear Production in completing special reviews and i
projects.jand support of production activities.
Lma.mte m.:* cf das //tE{
i 1
1 17.2-5
M SB 1 & 2 r
FSAR i
2.
Th: N :1::: Fervicer Orte; fu-etic r 15 direct ru;; rt ef the phyrier, r;rrrtir r and 20:i0 j
St: tier ir the errre ef
'--'tk
-die; erl.
$J.
The Training Department is headed by the Training Manager who is responsible for the training activities described in FSAR Chapter j
13.
l i
I J,A'.
The Regulatory Services Manager supports the Station in regulatory compliance activities.
{
(/'.
Seabrook Station is headed by the Station Manager. who is respon-sible for the operation and administration of Seabrook Station.
[
To carry out this assignment the Station Manager has the staff i
and organization described in FSAR Chapter 13.
The various parts of this organization implement their assigned aspects of the Program as follows:
t (a)
Station Manager 1.
Overall responsibility for implementation aspects of L
the Program on Seabrook Station structures, systems l
and components.
t j
2.
Is Chairman of r.he Station Operation Review Committee (SORC).
(b)
Assistant Station Manager i
The Assistant Station Manager reports directly to the i
Station Manager and is responsible tot
]
3 1.
Supervise the station planning and scheduling activities, procurement, inventory and records management.
1 i
2.
Is a member of the Station Operation Review Committee
]
($0RC).
l 3.
Assumes the responsibilities of the Station Manager j
in his absence.
j l
j 17.2-6 I
l
}
Assist in the training of operations personnel to assure an adequate number of qualified employees for each task.
3.
Prepare, review, approve and implement the operating procedures to be used for Station operations.
4.
Direct actions, within the realm of the Operations Group, to perform the balance of the surveillance testing program required by the Station license.
5.
Maintain a staff of fire protection personnel.
_,,______._ e ___,___
n__,___.__
The Dir::::: :f C::;:::t: S::ci:::
- t
- t: th: S :i;;
"h;
";;;id;;; ;;d int::f:;;
ri 5 th: 'li;; " ;;id;;; - I;;i;;;;i;; : d
. t rlity " e;-cre_
e 1
. 37 __ggi f: :::::::::g:_ :23 :; :g:1-u prej ect re- ;::::: ::d f::ilitic:.
Qspie //<r/fr4le$ /!.4norisdr.agire W/!c ro-Ce
.dv
__:::1:: :f._ :;;;;;; C:::::m 0#f to/kr/dAid/./pittos1%W/*dIhr i
The Dir ::::
f M ::;;;;;; C:::::1 reports to the 5::i:: "i::
4 President and interfaces with the Vice President,.3 Engineering, end-4,ce#5<///,a,,d Quality Programs.
He is responsible for purchasing' and contracts, l
information resources, employee relations and budgets.
disp 6elbrl$$Afklsw<iT8*
The NHY Purchasing Department reports to the Dir:::::.. M a g _.. ;
O[ierr Isarseks and provides the purchasing activities as described belows c
1.
NHY Purchasing Department l
NHY Purchasing is minimally involved in the implementation of 2
the Program, since quality aspects concerned with procurement of materials and services that are within the scope of the Program
[
and are performed by others. Specific functions and responsibi1~
ities of the Purchasing Department ares l
i 3
(a)
Issue Purchase Orders in response to Material Purchase Requests that are generated and approved.
(b)
Maintain current the commercial status of Purchase Orders.
4 Z~,0M/? Y A
l 1
17, 28 4
i
- ~ - - _ ___
INSERT A FOR PAGL 17.2-8 d.
Executive Director - Emergency Preparedness and Community Relations The Executf.ve Director - Emergency Preparedness and Corsnunity Relations is responsible for the development and maintenance of the on-site radiological emergency plan and for the development and coordination of required offsite radiological emergency response plans within the 10 and 50 mile planning zones. He reports to the NHY President and r
interfaces with the Vice President, Engineering, Licensing, and Quality o
l Programs.
i t
i r
i i
i 1
I l
I 1
4
+
I i
1 i
i a
i f
I, i
]
a t
a i
t a'
l l
i t
I
- e
Yankee Atomic Electric Company - Nuclear Services Division _(YNSD) l 1.
Organization The YNSD organizational interface with NhY for quality l
assurance activities is shown in Figure 17.2-1.
Dln N
The YNSD organization consists of a variety of disciplines.
The two that provide the direct interface with NHY are the Quality Assurance Department and the Projects Department. The 'A Projects Department draws upon,the other YNSD technical disciplines to furnish the specific support services as they are needed.
2.
Re s ponsibilitie s_
YNSD responsibilities in support of Seabrook Station are:
~
(a)
Quality Assurance Decartment (1) Aseure that YNSD activities comply with requirements of the OQAP.
(2) Provide evaluation, inspection.and/or surveillance of vendor services for Seabrook Station. This includes evaluation of Qn programs and procedures, the examination of vendors selected to fabricate or furnish material, equipment and services and maintenance of an updated list of such approved vendors.
(3) Provide the YNSD interface he NHY Vice l
N Fresident A Engineering ynd Quality Programs and carry out func tionT-t'n' accordance with l procedt-res and agreements between YNSD and NHY.
(b)
Projects Department Draw upon the varied technical expertise within YNSD, and coordinate activities in support of Seabrook Station.
(c)
Technical Discipline Departments Provide the technical expertise required by the Projects Department in the areas of Plant Engineering,1,1 censing, Environmental Engineering, Fuel Cycle and Nuclear Engineering.
17.2-10
Nuclear Saf ety Audit and Review Committee (NSARC) l t
NSARC is an executiv6 body that is responsible for conducting a critical examination of Station activities, including Station l
ope:*ation, evaluation of procedures, investigations of abnormal L
conditions, and functioning of the OQAP. Technical Specifications i
define the responsibilities and authority of NSARC. A written charter, approved 'oy the ?:rirr "i:: President, designates the membership, authority and rules f onduct of activities.
53 M
]
g.
Station Operation Review Committee (SORC) l t
SORC is an advisory group, composed of Station management and supervisory personnel, constituted for the purpose of reviewing l
current activities and determining the effect on operational safety. SORC recommends to the Station Manager approval or
[
disapproval of proposals considered by the Committee.
Technical Specifications define the responsibilities and authority of SORC. A written charter, app.oved by the Station Manager, designates membership, author!.ty and rules for conduct of activities.
j 17.2.1.4 Authority to Stop Work 9
a.
NHY l
1 The Nuclear Quality Mar.ager and desig, ated Nuclear Quality t
personnel have the responsibility and written authority to stop work or other activities that are not in compliance with the 54 58 Program.
t b.
YNSD I
The YNS0 Director of QA and, through him, personnel of the YNSD-I QAD have the responsibility and authority to stop work, if required, on activities delegated to YNSD.
17.2.1.5 Responsibility to Report l
Included in the corporate policy, and an essential part of this Program, is the responsibility of all NHY, Seabrook Station, and YNSD personnel working l
within the scope of this Program, to report to their supervisor any equipment, 54 l
work or other activity that is not in compliance with this Program.
Should i
I the circumstances warrant such action, particularly when a substantial safety l
l hazard or when the public health and safety is involved, the situation is to l
be further reported to the Technical Projects Manager or to the Nuclear lwl i
Quality Manager, or to other increasingly higher levels of NMY and Station management until appropriate action is observed to be undertaken.
54 l
17.2-11 i
l 1
i
SB 1 & 2 FSAR 17.2.2.7 Manage =ent Evaluation a.
In addition to any major quality problems which are immediately brought to the attention of upper management, the Nuclear Quality Manager meets regularly with the Vice President,ef Engineering, h ens Q nd Quality Programs to discuss the ongoing implemintation and adequacy of the OQAP.
The meetings include r*'
53 61 the results of audits, surveillances, and, inspection, quality j
trends, significant problems and interactions with the regulatory g,
agencies.
b.
NSARC performs a bi-annual audit of the OQAP and submits a report to the Cenior Vice President. This report provides NHY management l
with an independent assessment of the OQAP. The NSARC identifies 55 and tracks corrective action.
,f2&wnwC)ar.us.'Gyn0.:alotf 17.2.2.8 Indoctrination and Training 7747ecerr The Quality Assurance portion of the non-licensed training program consists of introductory and specialized training.
The introductory training segment instructs new or transferred employees, who may perform quality related activities, in the purpose, scope and method of implementation of quality-related manuals, instructions and procedures. This segment also describes the company organization, interface with regulatory bodies and other topics pertinent to the employees job description.
Specialized training in areas of inspection. test, and auditing leads to certification or qualification of individuals. This training is '-(tiated as l
early as practical to meet 00AP objectives.
For the formal training programs, +"
documentation includes the objectives, content of the Program, attendees, and l
dates of attendance.
6-The scope, technical content, and frequency of training is determined by the Nuclear Quality Manager. Tests are given as necessary to those NOG personnel
, g3 performing and verifying activities af fecting quality.
Acceptance criteria Su are developed to determine if individuals are properly trained and qualified. Employee proficiency is maintained by retraining, reexamining, or recertifying.
The licensed training program, assures that a sufficient number of appro-l priately trained and licensed individuals are available to operate Seabrook SS Scation.
1 l
l 17.2-18 l
Sb 1 & 3 FSAR 17.2.4.6 Accentance Methods used to accept items are dependent on the scope of purchase and l
include one or more of the following:
s.
Source verification 2
b.
Receipt Inspection 1
c.
Supplier Certificate of Conformance f
d.
Post Installation Test 17.2.5 Procedures, Instructions and Drawings l
i i
VRY controls and performs all activities, such as design, procurement and operation, through a series of procedures, instructions, drawings and other Dl 5'
documents which define the methods for complying with the eighteen criteria of 10CTR50 Appendix 5 and Regulatory Guide 1.33.
D L
The appropriate Vice President or /irector is responsible for the preparation l
of procedures which define organizational relationships in a manner that assures compliance to the quality requirements delineated in the OQAP.
i Designated managers are responsible for preparing procedures consistent with lg
[
NHY quality philosophy, the OQAP, and their assigned work activities.
9 The Seabrook Station departuents prepare and maintain procedures for administrative control and technical support and the safe and efficient j
operation of the Station. These procedures establish the system for off-site l
53 interfaces, conduct of operations and operating status. The procedures provide instructions for performing activities in areas of Station administration, operations, refueling, maintenance, and other specialized 9
i technical support functions.
I i
the Training Manager prepares and maintains procedures necessary to provida instructions to administer and document the licensed and non-licensed l
training program and keep abreast of design changes which impact the use of the simulator.
()yreet4 </dh A(N#A$UN'*Yh I
The
...-.._,--.. 0::=1 provides procedures for accomplishing routine
" *I i
activities within the f:;r:- which define the interf aces with other NHY departments that initiat rocurement or contract documents.
Rwn-s b.rsawawr 44 Procedures, instructions and drawings contain applicable quantitative and l
4 qualitative acceptarice criteria, as warranted, to enable determination of l*"
satisfactory accomplishment of technical and quality requirements.
n[
1 i
)
17.2-24 m.
'l I
~
l 58A&2 I
FSAR l
17.2.15 Nonconforming Materials. Parts or Components 17.2.15.1 Identification and Controi 1
i Materials, parts or components, which are deficient in characteristic, j
documentation or procedure which render the quality unacceptable or
)
indeterminate are identified as nonconformances. The Supervisor of a j
j technical area or activity that is within the scope of the OQAP is responsible i
j for documenting the nonconformance in accordance with established procedures, and assuring proper control to prevent inadvertent use or installation.
{
Controls may include marking, tagging or physical segregation. Affected i
organisations are notified of the nonconformance and subsequent actions taken through distribution of a report describing the nonconforming item.
}
n 17.2.15.2 Disposition and Resolution 1
The Station Manager is responsible for assignment of technically qualified personnel to evaluate the extent and impact of the nonconformance to determine a disposition for the item; (i.e., repair, rework, scrap or use-as-is) and to take appropriate action, when necessary, to prevent recurrence. For l
nonconformances involving repair or use-as-is dispositions, procedures specify i
f j
the organization responsible for the performance of an engineering review function. All dispositions are documented and signed by responsible parties.
f j
Acceptability of rework or repair of material parts and components is verified l
by qualified personnel reinspecting or ratesting the item as originally specified or by alternate means approved for the application.
l l
I I
J A designated NHY Manager is responsible to administer the nonconformance 5)
M I
reporting system.
The Nuclear Quality Group reviews and documentation each
{
report of a nonconforming ites. This review and documentation verifies that l
j the deficiency was properly and correctly stated, the dispcsition and I
corrective action are acceptable and the steps to prevent recurrence are l
effective.
l 4
j 17.2.15.3 Trend Analysis s
l The Nuclear Quality Manader maintains a system to recognize, evaluate, l
4 document, and assess quality trends. The system provides for periodic
$3 l l
]
analysis of reports on nonconforming items, inspection, surveillance and J
audit reports, and the submit M -n significant results to the Vice l3 lNl j
President,e+ Engineering, icensing nd Quality Programs for review and SS I
l appropriate action.
1 17.2.16 Corractive Action i
17.2.16.1 Initiation i
I Corrective action is that action taken to identify, correct and preclude l
recurrence of conditions adverse to the quality of at.tivittes or equipment.
NHY programs identify those conditions for which corrective action may be l
warranted including:
1 17.2-37 1
4
a.
Failure of a structure, system or component that is within the scope of the OQAP.
65 b.
Defect of an item or service that could, if uncorrected, lead to failure or malfunction.
c.
Operation outside of specified limits.
d.
Repetitive minor problems which may be symptomatic of a larger problem.
e.
Reportable occurrences as defined by the Technical Specification.
j f.
Loss or apparent loss of special nuclear material (SNM).
j g.
Significant conditions ioatified by the NRC, SCRC, NSARC or audit l
program.
m Corrective action is normally documented through appropriate procedures.
In the case of significant conditions adverse to safety, the corrective action includes an evaluation of the cause of the condition, the recommended action to prevent or reduce the probability of recurrence, and verification of completion of corrective action. A special report may be prepared when a significant condition adverse to safety is identified. This ' report identifies root causes and documents action raken to preclude recurre1ce.
17.2.16.2 Assessment Procedures require that corrective action associated with nonconformance l
reports, and other special corrective action rerorts are reviewed for adequacy 9
and timeliness. The Nucler@l' Manager periodically reports to the Vice l
President g Engineering Licensin and Quality Programs on the effectiveness Nl of the corrective action and status of incomplete items.
Corrective M action reporting is included in the trend analysis program.
17.2.17 Quality Assurance Records 17.2.17.1 Identification j
The Nuclear Quality Kanager and other cognizant managers have the joint lU i
responsibility for detertsining and identifying quality assurance records that are to be retained and their retention period. Examples of the types of records retained include procurement documents', peocedures, NDE results t i
inspection, audit and test results material analyses equipment, process and personnel qualifications; calibration records, nonconformances and corrective 1
action results and station operating records.
Inspection and test records, l
where applicable, identify the inspector or data recorder, type of observa-h tion, results, acceptability of the results, date, and action taken in l
S.
i 17.2-38 1
i j
4 4
4 4
0 0
0 O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O G
S O
3
=
L'W-h5 CC nR
=S
~*
de u w a n Y
- U m
2E ARM o"
g-e y
-4=
aY.g d*
d 2 CCM
=
W aa T
G a
Y U
- E
~
4*
I vn WE
- {
_2 W tJ.U
.euume
. mum-se sFEj W
= w a
.. a Va y
V a
b N
=
3, ML D
-u 4m n
e g
e o a
y IW k'
n Q
do 0
U is a n
- b ;y c".
jK
- J k
~;
M r
1~~
r.
p W-_
M L
G 2
h M
XI on 0;
0;
.?
8 EM
=
g
=
O 2
5 M
a*
0=
=
0 70 N
??
4 M, M,
,,*y I
f 6
.m
=
M~
s'
-g
-n i..
_I
.L*
2 K
?.
=
=
M U
N a n r.
n X !!
uW-U W2 i
W W E.
4
- ,I p
- ? V l.
tt g J 5V*
_s
.M e
EE n.
I h
'a
%e W y
3,y a
'g g=
=
a y) g
- g g
u p, Y. Y.
O Y L'
- .. W
SB 1 & 2 FSAR FICURE 178-1 MANUALS VERSUS OQAP CRITERIA J
MANUAL QUALITY ASSURANCE CRITERIA N N N N N N S N N N N S S S S !; :s S S Q O T H N 4 3 IMPLEMENTED BY MANUALS Y Y P Y P P S // P f/ P S P S S ll
- S S A P C A P sS I/ D M Q C P C R T R E F P H H C i)
P R H H H H H 1S fA C H A C S P E R H Q P R A M ~
P M P M M M M T 1 P ORGANI2.4 TION x x x x x x x
1:
x x x x x c
p, QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM s
x x x x
r x
x DESIGN CONTROL x x x x x
x x
PROCUREMENT DOCUMENT C04 TROL p x x x x
x x x
INSTRUCTIONS, PROCEDURES AND DRAUINGS x x x x x
x x x
x x x x x x
x y
nOCUMENT CONTROL y x x x x
x x x x x x
,x x
CONTROL OF PURCitaSED MATERIAL, EQUIPMENT, AND SERVICES X
x x
IDENTIFICATION AND CONTROL OF MATERIALS, PARTS, AND COMPONENTS x
x x
CONTROL OF SPECIAL PROCESSES x
x x x x
INSPECTION x
x x x v.
x x x x x
TEST CONTROL x
x y
x x
r x
x CONTROL OF MEASURING AND TEST EQUIPMENT x
x x
IIANDLING, STORAGE, AND SifIPPING x
x INSPECTION, TEST, AND OPERt. TING STATUS x
/ x x
x i
x x x
NONCONFORMING MATERIALS, PARTS, OR COMPONENTS x
x x
x x
CORRECTIVE ACTION x
x x
x QUALITY ASSURANCE RECORDS x x x x x A x x x x x x x x,
- 4 x x x x
AUDITS x
x i
l x
NOTE - A Key for the Manual's abbreviations is contained on the next page.
l' 4
SB 1 & 2 FSAR FICURE 178-1 MANUALS VERSUS OQAP CRITERIA (Continued)
MANUALS APPLICABILITY ABBREVIATIONS KEY pj"m hs //anps40e Y A'** N#4s /
?__
u
rini::::ti:: ? - !::: " :::::::t "::::1 MAMM Maintenance Management Manual NPCC Production Computer Control Manual NPEQ Production Equipment Qualification Program Manual 1:PMM Production Management Manual NPHT Production Modification and Test Manual prN EGAE-W W ? :ducti:: Reporting Boeg+ee. Manual gygg-M4W4 Ns/?::ducti:2 Records Managmenent Fre;- r Manual NPIR Production Technicsl Requirements Manual NYDC NHY Design Control Program Manual "Y??
"9? ?::;;;; : d ?:::: dure: " :: 1 NYQA Operational Quality Assurance Program Manual OPMM Operations Management Manual QAMM Quality Assurance Management Manual SPPR Production Special Process Procedures Reference Manual SSCP Seabro'ok Station Chemistry Program Manual SSFP Seabrook Station Fire Protection Program Manual SSCT
- i ;;h C:::i: C ::: 1 ::d S;::i:lity T::ini ; ?::;;;; "::::1 SSMA Seabrook Station Haintenance Program Manual SSMM Seabrook Station Hanagement Manual
!!??
S::i ::t Et:ti:: S:':drii ; :-d "12--!:; ?::;rer ": u L SSPM Seabrook Station Pr'.eurement and Materials Program Manual SSRP Seabrook Station Radiation Protection Program Manual SSSP Seabrook Station Security Program Manual TCMM Training Center Management Manual ypg 7)Afo'.o ?/aodaf ml$cWadsf
- N***"
- l
.