ML20204G701

Submits List of Issues to Be Provided to Util for Consideration & Discussion at Forthcoming Meeting Covering rigid-to-rigid Restraints & Anchors & Idvp

ML20204G701
Person / Time
Site:	Diablo Canyon
Issue date:	06/13/1984
From:	Vollmer R Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:	Eisenhut D Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML17325B782	List: IA-84-741, Forwards Inputs to Sser 24,including Staff Evaluation of 840202 Petition Filed by Govt Accountability Project Inst for Policy Studies & Updated Info on Allegations 39 & 45. SALP Input Encl ML20204G482 ML20204G589 ML20204G603 ML20204G606 ML20204G646 ML20204G660 ML20204G695 ML20204G701 ML20207S747 ML20207S758 ML20207S787 ML20207S803 ML20207S831 ML20207S840 ML20207S856 ML20207S871 ML20207S884 ML20244D033
References
FOIA-84-741, FOIA-84-742 NUDOCS 8407110572
Download: ML20204G701 (2)

Text

,

s.

. E

1. o,, UNITED STATES

!" n NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION b ,1 WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555

%.....# June 13, 1984 MEMORANDUM FOR: Darrell G. Eisenhut, Director Division of Licensing FROM: Richard H. Vollmer, Director Division of Engineering

SUBJECT:

DEFINITION OF ISSUES T0 BE PROVIDED TO PG&E FOR FORTHCOMING MEETING As we discussed today, the following issues should be provided to PG&E for their consideration and discussion at a forthcoming meeting:

3 1

1. PG&E should provide a detailed technical justification for their evaluation and shimming of closely-spaced rigid-to-rigid

[elP -

j I

i restraints and anchors. As part of this evaluation PG&E should erarine criteria different than those used for Diablo Canyon and justify the criteria used for Diablo Canyon. In a O[,h M44 g J similar manner, demonstrate the analysis for functionability of snubbers that were installed next to rigid supports, f, Q ( /[ Demonstrate that the criteria used on Diablo Canyon will not

. L g provide excessive piping loads.

h , f1 c p 2. with respect to the Independent Design verification Program, reevaluate the IDVP's assessment of work done by various internal and contract groups in assessment of piping and kn support loads. In particular, focus on the rationale used by IDVP in not taking a larger sample of piping problems when IDVP uncovered deficiencies in a high proportion of the sample taken.

3. Provide those measures that are currently in place or are to -

be instituted on current and future work activities performed by any and all onsite engineering groups in the following areas:

a. Personnel indoctrination and training to assure effective implementation of all QA and technical program requirements;

b. An upgrading of site procedures and avoidance of use of unauthorized documents to perform work functions; N

N' c %:Ph 65-7LM2]To n/

Ty"Q DJL .

7. ,

. y

" ,e g cl , .:

+ <

c, -

~~ ~

3.

e Darrell G. Eisenhut - 2- .s

c. Anupgradeoftheproceduralcontrolofpreliminehy '"

design data and design interfaces between site group and "-

offsite groups;; -

./

d. An improvement in the timeliness of project responses to site personnel safety concerns and QA aud!(, findings;

e. P.lansfortheconductofQAprogramaudits.thatwi.1/ "

insure all aspects of design control requirements dre ~

implemented in accordance with program provisions;end insure that the audit results are thoroughly evaluated

• prior to accepting corrective actions; and '

f. Modification of tolerance clarifict. tion program implementati'on to-assure that adequate design reviews are mace prior to mgjor hardware modifications.

1 Richard H. Vollmer, Director Div'ision Qf Engineering cc: J. Knight s

H. Schierling '

4 w

0 t

k p

8 , - - . _ . _ , . y ,