ML20202H403

Advises of Plan to Conduct Preimplementation Audit of Dcrdr Scheduled for 860812-15.Listed Arrangements Should Be Made in Order to Assist NRC During Audit.Tentative Agenda for Audit & List of Audit Team Members Encl

ML20202H403
Person / Time
Site:	FitzPatrick
Issue date:	07/11/1986
From:	Abelson H Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:	Brons J POWER AUTHORITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK (NEW YORK
References
NUDOCS 8607160304
Download: ML20202H403 (7)

Text

July 11,1986 Distribution Docket No. 50-333 (DocketFfiej i NRC'PDR l

Local PDR PD#2 Reading Mr. John C. Brons RBernero l Senior Vice President- 0 ELD

! . Nuclear Generation EJordan l Power Authority of the State BGrimes of New York JPartlow 123 Main Street NThompson White Plains, New York 10601 HAbelson

$Norris

Dear Mr. Brons:

ACRS(10) -

Gray File

SUBJECT:

PRE-IMPLEMENTATION AUDIT OF THE JAMES A. FITZPATRICK NUCLEAR POWER PLANT DETAILED CONTROL ROOM DESIGN REVIEW (DCRDR)

As discussed with members of your staff recently, we plan to conduct a pre-implementation audit of the Fitzpatrick DCRDR. This audit is scheduled for August 12 through August 15, 1986 at the Fitzpatrick facility. To assist us in this effort, we request that you make the following arrangements.

1. Review team personnel (including contractors) knowledgeable in each of the DCRCR tasks should be available to discuss the review process and to respond to staff questions during the audit.

2. Documentation of the DCRDR organization, process, and results to date should be available.

3. Conference or office space should be available for the NRC staff's meeting with the Power Authority and for the staff and its consultants to meet privately.

4 Access to the control room, the remote shutdown facilities, and the control room simulator (if any), should be provided for audit team members, as necessary.

l

5. Clearance to bring camera equipment on site and to take photographs in the control room, at the remote shutdown facilities; and other areas that would assist in evaluating the DCRDR and SPDS, should be provided.

Enclosed, for planning purposes, is a tentative agenda for the audit'and a list of audit team members. ,

Sincerely, Original signed by/ l 8607160304 8 333 DR ADOG O PDR p Harvey I. Abelson, Project Manager 1 l BWR Project Directorate #2 l l Division of BWR Licensing l l

-g-Enclosed, for planning purposes, is a tentative agenda for the audit and a list of audit team members.

Sincerely, Original signed by/

Harvey I. Abelson, Project Manager BWR Project Directorate #2 Division of BWR Licensing l

Enclosures:

As stated cc: See next page I

1 l

l Pf4k/jf n t PD# PD#2 St rris HAtWlson:jch DMuller 7/l0/86 7/{1/86 7/ \s/86 l

1 l

l l l

l

) '

f1r. John C. Brons James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Fower Authority of the State of New York Power Plant cc:

Mr. Charles _ M. Pratt Mr. Jay Dunkleberger Assistant General Counsel Division of Policy Analysis Pov:cr Authority of the State and Planning of New York New York State Energy Office 10 Columbus Circle Agency Building 2 flew York, New York 10019 Empire State Plaza Albany, New York 12223 Resident Inspector's Office U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

• Regional Administrator, Region I >

Post Office Box 136 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Lyconing, New York 13093 631 Park Avenue King of Prussia, Pennsylvania 19406

- Mr. A. Klausman fir. Radford J. Converse Vice President - Quality Assurance Resident Manager Power Authority of the State Jares A. FitzPatrick Nuclear of New York Power Plant 10 Columbus Circle Post Office Box 41 New York, New York 10019 Lycoming, New York 13093 Mr. J. A. Gray, Jr. Mr. George Wilverding, Chairman Director - Nuclear Licensing - BWR Safety Review Committee Power Authority of the State Power Authority of the State of New York of New York 123 Main Street 123 Main Street White Plains, New Ycrk 10601 White Plains, New York 10601 Mr. Robert P. Jones, Supervisor Town of Scriba R. D. #4 Oswego, New York 13176 Mr. Leroy W. Sinclair Power Authority of the State of New York 10 Columbus Circle New York, New York 10019 Mr. M. C. Cosgrove Quality Assurance Superintendent James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant Post Office Box 41 Lycoming, New York 13093

c-7_

1 , .

ENCLOSURE d

TENTATIVE AGENDA

_ JAMES A. FITZPATRICK NUCEAR POWER PLANT

~

DETAILED CONTROL ROOM DESIGN REVIEW PRE-IMPLEMENTATION AUDIT Tuesday. August 12, 1986 2

AM 8:35 NRC Entry Briefing (Ramirez)

New York Power Authority presentation on DCRDR l

I A. DCRDR status 1

! B. Description of individuals and disciplines responsible for various DCRDR activities -

C. FunctionandTaskAnalysis(F&TA) i 1. Describe the process used to identify information and control needs.

.- 2. Discuss the use of the BWROG ERGS to i conduct the FATA.

3. Discuss the personnel and their respective disciplines who conducted the FATA. r i

12:00 Lunch PM 1:00 (continuationofC.above) ,

4. Discuss which revision of the BWROGs was used ,

to conduct the FATA. I 1

D. Control Room Inventory l l

1 l

1 w . .

. 2-0

1. Describe how the verification process was used to identify missing and unsuitable instrumentation.

~

2. Discuss the use of the control room mockup and walkthrough videotapes as the control room inventory.

3. Identify personnel who supervised assembly of the mockup,' developed the videotapes, and made the comparison of control room I&C requirements with existing control room instrumentation.

E. HED Assessment Describe the' criteria and process used to determine safety significance of HEDs.

F. Audit of HEDs and proposed corrections (1:00 PM - 4':00 PM)

Audit Team Meeting Summary of days events as needed.

1 Wednesday, August 13, 1986 AM ,

8:35 A. Selection of Design Improvements

1. Describ'e process used to select HED design improv$nents

2. Identif;y personnel involved in the selection of HED design : improvements.

I B. Verification that design improvements correct HEus without 1 introducing new HEDs.

1. Describe the criteria and process used to provide such verification.

2. Describe how the SPDS/ EPIC was verified as a design improvement to correct HEDs without introducing new HEDs. ,

I

12:00 Lunch

~

'PM 1:00 ,C. Coordination of DCRDR with other NUREG-0737 Supplement 1 initiatives.

1. Describe the H. F. program to be used to integrate the i SPDS with the control room.

2. Describe the process to be used to coordinate control j room design changes with training.

3. Describe the process used to integrate new Regulatory

. Guide 1.97 instrumentation into the control room D. Proposed design impr'ovements and justification for partially correcting or leaving uncorrected safety significant HEDs.

1. Discuss details of proposed design corrections for

~

significant HEDs. For exemple, discuss how the EPIC SPDS will resolve each of the 36 HEDs, and provide the implementation date for this system.

2. Clearly describe the 50 category 2 and 3 HEDs for which no correction is proposed. Also, discuss proposed justification for each HED.

Thursday August 14, 1986 AM 8:30 A. Scheduling

1. Describe the justification for delaying correction of HEDs until 1988.

s ,\

1

-4, e

2. Describe the 13 HEDs still under review and provide justification for not resolving these until approximately mid 1987.

10:00 B. Discuss status of EPIC /SPDS.

C. NRC to audit selective HED corrections proposed 12:00 Lunch PM

, 1:00 (Continuation of C. above)

D. Audit of remote shutdown panel 4:00 E. NRC team meeting to summarize observations.

Friday, August 15, 1986

~

AM 8:30 A. NRC technical discussions with licensee.

B. Exit Briefing Audit Team Members: R. G. Ramirez, NRC C. Kain, SAIC D. Schultz, COMEX K. Chadda, SAIC 4 FM

- ,. - - , , - -- - , - n - , - m a -, - - m