ML20202E269
| ML20202E269 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Millstone  |
| Issue date: | 02/16/1998 |
| From: | Schopfer D SARGENT & LUNDY, INC. |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM) |
| References | |
| 9583-100, NUDOCS 9802180111 | |
| Download: ML20202E269 (113) | |
Text
. - _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ - _ _ _ - _ ________..
.w .
?
m
./
x.:a Bur goruts & Lundy $ $ $
\i Don K- Schopfer Jr IEYdSIs'"# '
February 16,1998 Project No. 9583100 !
Docket No. 50-423 Northeast Nuclear Energy Company Millstone Nuclear Power Station, Unit No. 3 Independent Corrective Action Verification Program United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attention: Document Control Desk Washington, D.C. 20555 Enclosed are discrepancy reports (DRs) identified during our review activities for the ICAVP.
These DRs are being distributed in accordance with the Communications Protocol, PI MP3_-01.
I have also enclosed the following six (6) DRs that have been determined invalid. No action is required from Northeast Utilities for these DRs. The basis for their invalid determination is included on the document DR No. DR-MP3 1001 DR No. DR MP3-1052 DR No. DR MP31002 DR No. DR MP31054 DR No. DR MP31034 DR No. DR-MP31056 I have also enclosed the following forty (40) DRs for which the NU resolutions have been 9
l reviewed and accepted by S&L.
L \
DR No. DR-MP3-0090 DR No. DR MP3 0168 DR No. DR-MP3-0391 Ql l l
DR No. DR-MP3-0169 DR No. DR MP3-0392 DR No. DR-MP3-0413 f
DR No. DR MP3-0224 DR No. DR-MP3-0416 DR No. DR MP3 0254 DR No. DR-MP3-0426 3 3 d- g -DR No. DR-MP3 0256 DR No. DR-MP3-%02 A DR No. DR-MP3 0262 DR No. DR-MP3-0629 DR No. DR MP3-0314 DR No. DR-MP3-0340 DR No. DR-MP3-0637 DR No. DR-MP3-0663 gg { gglll lll DR No. DR-MP3-0379 DR No. DR-MP3-0685 0 Ok23 CNeago. IL 60603 5780 USA
- 312 269-2000 P PDR-
l .
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission February 16,1998 Document Control Desk Project No. 9583100 Pag:2 DR No. DR MP3-0691 DR No. DR MP3-0796 DR No. DR-MP3 0708 DR No. DR MP3-0798 DR No. DR MP3 0709 DR No. DR MP3 0799 DR No. DR MP3 0726 DR No. DR MP3-0800 DR No. DR MP3 0729 DR No. DR MP3 0801 DR No. DR MP3 0739 DR No. DR-MP3-0837 DR No. DR MP3 0754 DR No. DR MP3 0841 DR No. DR MP3-0758 DR No. DR MP3-0849 DR No. DR MP3-0778 DR No. DR MP3-0889 DR No. DR MP3 0791 DR No. DR MP3-0919 I have also cnclosed the eight (8) DRs for which the NU resolutions have been reviewed but not accepted. S&L comments on these resolutions have been provided.
DR No. DR MP3-0225 DR No. DR MP3-0623 DR No. DR MP3 0226 DR No. DR MP3-0664 DR No. DR MP3-0228 DR No. DR MP3-0665 DR No. DR MP3-0617 DR No. DR MP3-0702 Please direct any questions to me at (312) 269-6078.
Yours very truly, b /
V D. K. Schopfer Senior Vice President and ICAVP Manager DKS:spr Enclosures Copies: .
E. Imbro (1/1) Deputy Director, ICAVP Oversight T. Concannon (1/l) Nuclear Energy Advisory Council L Fougere (1/1) NU aw ww.oua&ic r
_=
i N a tt w est U u m s ICAVP DR No. DR4P3#90 mistorm uret 3 Discrepancy Report
> view aroup: syenem on nesotursow AccerTeo f
- " '""
- Pdenneloperehenyissue !
8'P""'8 N % C) yee .
Olmeroponey Types colouhaan g g, e, r . ::'sWP Nne sientheenselevel 4 Date famed to NO:
! DonePuhashed: stanw ;
, -,8 Pipe Support Calculation NP(F) Z019A 133 Discrepancy Descripeten: We have reviewed the Pipe Support Calculation no. NP(F).
l 2019A 133, Rev.7 including CCN no.1 and CCN no.2. Based 1 l upon this review,we have noted the following disoropancies:
- 1. Dimensions used in STRUDL lAodel input are not consistent with those shown on the support drawing no. BZ 19A 19-3,Rev.0. Review of GRITS data base revealed no open chan0e :
documents posted apsinet this drawing.Since the
- aforementioned differonoss exceed the desi0n allowanoes l provided for Installation tolerances,they nood to be addressed for their impact on the results of the computer analysis and on0i neering judomont statements on papes 21 and 22,
- 2. CCN no.1 and CCN no.2 utillae comparison method to !
- evaluate the impact of the latest loads on the results of base l plate analysis. Load fadors based on the comparison of the new i-and old loads are as follows:
t.Fa0.65 for Fx load component LF=1,195 for Fz load component i Comparisons on pape no. 6 of CCN no.1 are based on application of both 0.65 load factortfor Fx component) and 1.195 :
load factor (for Fy component).
Comparisons on pape 6 of CCN no.2 only take into sooount ,
lower load factor of 0.65.
l In lieu of performing the detailed re analysis based on the actual magnitude of new loads,it is soooptable to apply load fadors provided the bl0host one is used for the purpose of the comparison.This methodology ensures that consistent and conservative approach is used.
, Therefore,the methodolopies utilized in CCN no.1 and CCN no.2 is discrepent because it does not provide a conservative asheasment of the revised loads on the existin0 analysis results.
Review l- vand invahd Neeeed Dale ,
in m eien Po w. A. O O O st2sw
- VT Lead
- Nat A'**'# B D D "7 vimen serase,oenx 0 0 0 *1 inc cienn: sine. Anens x 0 O O #8"
_Dese:
sNAUD:
Printed 2/is/9s11s 38 PM Past i er 2
_. - .. - - _ - _ - _ = _ _ - - . - _ . - . . _ - - ..
J Northeast UUinies ICAVP DR No. DRW3 MD uilistone unN 3 Discrepancy Report D** 2/12/96 nEs0LUT m: NU has concluded that Discrepancy Report, DR MP3 0090, has identirMx! a cond46on rd previously discovered by NU whloh requires correct 60n, This discrepancy meets the criteria specified in NRC letter 816901 and 17010. It has been screened per U3 Pl. ;
20 crMoria and found to have no operabilMy or reportability concerns and meets the Unt 3 deferral crMeria, CR MS 96-0515 has been written to develop and track resolution of this Nem per RP 4, Preyww.sy *nuned by Hut U ves @ me won Once.p.m conenwetU yes @ No m P.newtO v. @ w. n *m.ou *.deO va @ we n.*w Mi ;' ' hat ? - , ' ' ' Needed Date g p VT Leadt Hert, Anthony A vimns e w .Deng wie ce.nn: ne, An-w x g O g p,[
Date:
0 b D St. comments:
i l
l l
l i
PrWed 2nfW6 2.15A0 PM Pege 2 of 2
ICAVP DR No. DR MP34C3 Northeast Utilities Millstona Unit 3 Discrepancy Report Rev6ew ereup: Sysem DR REaOLUTioN ACCEFTED Review Element: system Design g
"'"'r"*"'** O vee N , my Type: Woonsing Documord gq SysterWProcess: sWP Nmc tr:: level: 4 Date fared to NU Date Published: W2947 D *repeaty: FSAR Description of operation of 36WP*MOV50 valves does not match drawing infomation Deecrt P 16en: The description of the operat;on of valves 38WP*MOV50A, B, C
& D does not agree with the logic and schematic drawings.
FSAR page 9.2 5 states:'An automatic controlinterlock prevents the openin0 of the rendor plant component cooling water heat exchanger isolation valves when the isolation valves to the containment recirculation roolers are open."
Based on a review of the drawings the statement and drawings do not agree. The drawin0s Indicate that the Interlock prevents the opening of the 3SWP*MOV50 valves (Reactor Plant Component Cooling Heat Exchan0er Service Water Supply) when either of the associated 3SWP*MOV54 valves (Containment Recirculation Cooler Service Water Supply) is not fully closed. This interlock is bypassed, however, if both of the associated Service Water pumps are running.
The statement does not take into account the bypass option.
Based on a review of the fol6owing drawings:
ESK 06AAF Rev 09 Elem Diao 480V MC Containment Recirc Cir Serv Wtr Supply Viv [36WP*MOV54A)
ESK-06AAG Rev 10 Elem Diag 480V MC Containment Recirc Cir Serv Wtr Supply Viv [3SWP*MOV548)
ESK-06AAH Rev06 Elem Diag 480V MC Containment Recirc Clr Serv Wtr Supply Viv [38WP'MOV54C]
ESK-06AAJ Rev 09 Elem Diao 460V MC Containment Reciro Clr Serv Wtr Supply Viv [3SWP*MOV54D]
ESK 06AAK Rev 09 Elem Diag 480V MC Reactor Plant Comp Cig Ht Exch Serv Wtr Supply Viv [3SWP*MOV50A)
ESK 06AAL Rev 06 Elem Dia0 480V MC Reador Plant Comp ClO Ht Exch Serv Wtr supply Viv [3SWP*MOV508)
LSK-09-01G Rev 11 Logic Dia0 ram Reactor Plant Component Cooling Water Review Valid Inveed Needed Oste initteler: Werner,1- 9 O O */1857 VT Lead: Hert. Anthony A Q Q Q SfilV97 Printed 2/1tW6 2;16:14 PM P or 2 1
l
...._..c_..
l DR No. DR MP301M l Northeast Utilities ICAVP.
Mllistone Unit 3 Discrepancy Report vi men ses,w, osa k 3 O u 8*'7
- sto cnuns segh, Anand K o O O ****7 Dele DNAup
Date: 2/13/M
! nes0LUTloN: NU has concluded that the issue reported in Discrepancy Report, i
DR MP3-01M, does not represent a diewspant condtlon. Based on the 60008 dia0 ram, the fol6owing lo0 i c applies: On a CDA
- signal, the 38WPWOV64 Containment Recirculation Cooler Servios Water supply valves open and SSWPWOVS0 RPCCW Heat Exchanger Servios Water supply valvss close. During the long term recovery of the socident, M la necessary to reopen the SSWPWOV50 valves and restore scryloe water to the FLPCCW heat exchen0ers for Spent Fuel Pool Cooling. To reopen these valves, the following lo060 is required
1
! The CDA si0nal must be reset, AND l i . Both train assoolated 38WPWOV54 valves must be closed.
OR l Both trein asecolated servloe water pumps must be running. l The FSAR appropriately refle:As the interiook betwoon the valves. In the paragraph follow 6ne the above referonood FSAR i statement, the FSAR discusses when and how servloe water to the RPCCW heat exchancer needs to be reestablished. Based on the above, R is concluded that the desion basis (lo0lc diagrams) is consistent with the licensing basis (FSAR) and no further action is required.
Sionifloarx* Level criteria do not apply here as this is not a l- discrepent condNion.
Conclusion:
NU has concluded that the issue reported in Disotopancy Report, '
DR-MPS 01M, does not represent a discrepent condNion. The FSAR as written is correct. The fundional response of the i
servloe water system valves to a CDA signal, including long term recovery actions, is well desertbed and scourate. Sionifloanoe Level ortoria do not apply here as this is not a discrepant oordMion.
=";idenuand try Nu? U Yes @ N. NonDescrapentConmuon?@ Yes U No nasamenpenenetO va @ me n a a man unr.e m .dt O Y a @ u.
ne*.
lHeister: Womer, l.
VTt.eed: NorI, Anthony A VT ugr schapter, Den K WIC Clenn: singh, Anand K O
Date: 2/13/06 et commente:
4 Prtnled 2/less 2:1o.1s PM Page 2 or 2
_ - . - . - . . - . _ . - - - . . . - .- .,--_ _ -. .--...- . -_ , . . - . _ ,a
BCAVP DR No. DR MP34169 j Northeast Utluties ulustone unit Discrepancy Report j newtow areep: syneem en menoLuftoN AcosPTOO l neview tesment: system Desiym j one ipsas: twi*ast ossen o y,, i Disorspeasy type: Lisensens Daewned g g, !
o, _ - _ . - : swr Nnc elenNiesame hwel: 4 Date FAXad to NW:
Date Puhilshed: W2247
~
r , ur: FSAR pa0e 9.24 description of 8WP strainer motor control switch does not match drowing information.
Desertreten: F8AR pa0s 9.2-4 states: *The servios water pump strainer i motor is contro1ed from the main board by a OFF/ AUTO /RUN switch with ind6cating lights.'
Por the Cordrol Switch Contact Dia0rsm the swnch osoutcheon i roads OFF/ AUTO /ON. In addition, per the schemat6cs and lo0 ios there are no indicating li0 hts. ;
This was confirmed by reviewing the followthe drawings:
ESK-03N Rev15 Cordrol Switch Contact Diagram l
ESK 06DD Rev 14 Elem Dia0480V MC Serv Wtrr Pmp Strainer & Backwash Viv [38WP*STRI A] [38WP*MOV24A]
t ESK-06DE Rev 14 Elem Diag 480V MC serv Wtrr Pmp Strainer & Backwash Viv [38WP*8TR1 B] [3SWP*MOV248]
ESK-06DF Rev 15 Elem Dia0 480V MC serv Wirr Pmp strainer & Backwash Viv [38WP*8TRIC) [38WP*MOV24C)
ESK-06DG Rev 16 Elem Dia0 480V MC Serv Wirr Pmp t Strainer & Backwash Viv [38WP*STR1D) [38WPEV24D]
LSK-09100 Rev 14 Logic Diagram Servios Water System newtow weed tweed Nessed Date Weister Womer.l. O O O mu7 VTl.and: Nwl. Arewy A G O O M587 vtener sehspier, oen x a O O M **7 M 7*7 inc cesan: sinen, Anans x 'S O O note: ,
wvauo:
Date: 2/13/98 nasoLLmoN: Disposition:
NU has concluded that Disorepancy Report DR MP3-0169, has identified a condNion not previously discovered by NU which requires correction. This discrepancy meets the ortleria specified in NRC letter 816901 and 17010. It has been screened per US Pb
< 20 criteria and found to have no operabilMy or reportabilty 2 .
concems and meets the Unit 3 deferral criteria. CR MS 97 3456
' has been written to develop and trook resolution of this item per Pnnled 2/1ses 2.ts.es PM Pese 1 or 2
. _. . . _ .m. _ . _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ , _ _ . _ _ _ _ . . , _ .
K:AVP DR No. DR4P841H Northeast Uundes Milletone Unit 3 Discrepancy Report RP4, Concluelon:
NU has concluded that Disoropency Report. DR MPS 0169, has lderdiflod a condition not previously discovered by NU which requires correction. This disoropency meets the orterte specified in NRC letter 516901 and 17010. N has been sorooned per US Pl-20 crterte and found to have no operabilNy or reportability conooms and meets the UnN 3 deferral orterte. CR MS 97 3468 has been written to develop and track resolution of this Nem per RP4.
,t / --?; Wenehed by Nut U Yes @ No NonmacropontConmuontU Yes @ No
--PenenetO v @ N. n hmea m t O ve. @ No n atow ininesor: Wemw, l.
vit d: Nat. Anthony A G 0 VT nae n schapen,DenK O g *jm y
me ce.nn: ainsh. Anand x 0 O
' Date: 2/13/98 et conmente: CR MS 97 3466 states that the FSAR will be updated by 9/9/99.
Printed 2/1ees 2:1s.# PM Psee 2 of 2
ICAVP DR Nm DRW34224 Northeast Uulitie.
utilstorm Unit 3 Olscrepancy Report Moview ereup: Cerfg Amon Dn nEs0LUT1oM ACCEPTED ne*w n=== ormwn inanan ,,,,,,,,,,o ,,,,s,s,, w inairm aiia c w o y, Oleerepency Type:Instatemen ..
gg s, _ J ' Ras NnC segntheenselevel:4 n,,e pang,g g, Nu:
Oste Puhtlehed: 12/1447
^
lancrepency: Installation not in socordance with drawings.
Desertreten: The following difference between the installation and the requirements of the Installation drowin9s were noted during rystem walkdowns.
Drawing 12179 BK 16P 70 Sheet 1 of 1 Rev. 3 shows proper instrument installation including level mounting. Horizontally mounted 3RSS-PT438 is not mounted in a level posMion. This could impact the accuracy and performance of the instrunumt.
ne*w veed inveed medad psee inlete6er sene,T.t O O O 15/*'7 VT Land: Nerl, Anthenr A O O O i t/**7 vT uon seen.oon K O O O 52dW'7 inc Chmn: singh. Anand K O O O 12dW'7 nate:
INWALD:
oste: 2/13/98 naaOLUTioN' Dispothlon:
NU has concluded that Discrepancy Report, DR MP3-0224, has identified a condition not previously discovered by NU which requires correction. This discrepancy meets the criterla specified in NRC letter 816901 and 17010. It has been screened per U3 Pl.
20 crMeria and found to have no operability or reportability concems and meets the UnM 3 deferral ortlerla. CR MS 96-0164 has been written to develop and track resolut6on of this Mem per.
RP 4.
Conclusion:
NU has concluded that Discrepency Report, DR-MP3-0224, has identified a condition not previously discovered by NU which requires correction. This discrepancy meets the orMoria specified in NRC letter 816901 and 17010. R has been screened per US PI-20 crtleria and found to have no operabillty or reportabillty conooms and meets the UnN 3 deferral criteria. CR M3-96-0164 has been written to develop and track resolution of this Mem per RP 4 -
mr"; h4mtland by Nu? U Yes @ No Non Descrepent condalon?U Yee @ No n.emeenrenenetO Ya - @ No P + unroe*estO Ya @ No ne*w Printed 2/1ses 2:17:,o PM Page 1 or 2
ICAVP DR
- M
- 84884 Northeast UWWes Mmetorw ur* 3 Discrepancy Report _
innisten womw.L VTLaod: Net, Ar#iony A gg viMen schopaw DenK O O *1 m ne ceann: sw. Anww x 0 0 0
Des: 2/1W94 et conmem: since sass.PT438 (Containment Roolrc Pump Discharge Prosauro) is non safety related this respotwo is soceptable Printed 2/16% 21723 PM Page 2 of 2
ICAVP DR No. DR.anP34:84 Northeast utsties ;
umotorm unit : Discrepancy Report ;
novio. ,: Asem vin smen e oRRenownowacosmo l
~ ~ ' ~ ~ , st o,e,s , - t oisei,s.e: i a e o""
, O va :
- oisorepeney Type
- cakdsman gg 7 s, rn- :N/A i
- NRC tegniaeancelevel
- 4 ones FAMadis NU ,
-r i
, essePuhmahed: 1010e7
... Normw Ranee Prosaurker Pressure . Calibration Data Conversion (Disorspency for Loop RCS*PT455)
Desert,#en The ICAVP reviewed the following documents in order to evaluate the pressurizer preneurs function setpoirds:
i i
References:
I' 1) FSAR Floure 711, shoots 8,8,11, is and 19 -
' 2) Procedure 3442C10, Proesurker Proesure Narmw Ran0e {
, Channel 1 Calibration, Rev.1 -
i 3)l&C Form 3442C101 Rev.1 Data papes 3, and 8 through 17
( of 19
- 4) Technical Specifications Manual, Table 2.21 Items 9 and 10 ,'
i Amendmert 114; Table 3.3-4 llem 1.d Amendmert 60, and item i 9.a Amendment 98 l i
i in reviewing those documerds the ICAVP identifies the following disotopanoles. :
i a) The use of the En0ineering Unit Conversion Factor shown in
- the Reference 3) data shoots, titled 'SETPOINT REFERENCES *, will not convert the onlibration data to the l soceptable setpoint values shown in Reference 4).
SETPOINT
REFERENCE:
! TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS US) Table 2.21, hem 10, ;
URIP SETPOINT <=2385pola);
imA=50 PSIA (from Pape 8 of Data Sheets). ,
I For example in order to convert the calibration data of 17.664 mA (Data shoot pa0s 8), to a pressure value and compare it with
' the acceptance cruerta contained in the T8 of <=2385psis the following calculations must be performed:
ImA=50pel; Pressure Transmitter (PT455) offset =1700pola (from Pape 3 of Data Sheets, including head corredion);
Calibrated Pressure =1700+l(mA 4)x50)=2383.2(psia).
4 b) The Referonos 1) Functional Diagram sheets contain a number of Notes. Some of these include a statemerd " Supplied j by Others". This does not refied the MP3 as built configuration. >
Review e Veed invand Needed Does ,
4 wusion sense.v.s.- 0 0 0 804*7 3 VT Laod: Rehope. Ral D 0 0 0 804'7 w, u_.. -m --n w am-,
Pnnled 2/1tW98 2;17.Os PM ~' " ~ ~ ' ' ~ ~ Pese 1 or 3
-- ~ _ - - _ _ _ - . . , _ . . . - _ _ _ . _ . . _ - _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ , _ _ . _ . - _ . - - .__
i ICAVP DR No. DR MP84354 Northeast Utilities Ministorm Unit a Discrepancy Report i VT Men schopfer. Den K g Q g eGe97 me oe m,h. An.ns x 0 0 0 *2m
- Oste:
WWauD:
Dahl 11/18/07 4 natoLnoes: Disposhion: -
NU has concluded that the leave reported in Disoropency Report.
DR MP3-0264, does not represort a discrepent condMion.
Nem e)The imA=60.0 PSI referonoe value is for information only FM is not an engineering conversion equation, it simply relates currett to pressure such that, if the currord input changes by 1 mA than the prosaurs output will chan0e by 60 PSI. Therefore, the factor imA=60.0 PSI of refotonos 3 is correct. The Prosaurtror Prosaure Narrow Renes Channel 1 Calibration
,- proceduto does not require the test techniolan to perform any j conversions. The acceptance orNorta for this surveillance is in mA. When the cummt value reaches the allowable value and the td stable trips within the procedure ecooptance orMeria ran0e the instrument passes.
- Hom b)The Functional Dia0 rem leeue was identified during the recent 60.64f FSAR review. NU reco0nized that they are ,
responalbie for all elements on the Westin0 house functional !
diagrams (NU drawing 26212 30001. SH4007. SH4000, SH4012,- )
i SH4020 and SH4010). However it was decided that the note (s) j provide helpful information by identifyin0 those elemords that l were part of the Westin0house Nucioer Steam Supply System l (NSSS) supplied package versus the elements that were part of !
the NU or (Archited Engineer) AE scope of supply. The notes - i and drawing do refloot the NU condNions from the NSSS vendor i perspective as well as what scope Westin0house Nuclear Energy i
Systems (NES) and NU / AE were responsible for. The drawings provide useful Information and are soooptable to NU.
840nificanoe Level orteria do not apply here as this is not a disotoport, cond# ion.
Conduelon:
NU has concluded that the leave reported in Disoropency Report, DR-MP3-0264, does not represent a discrepard condtion.
Nem a)The factor in the l&C Form 3442C101 Rev.1 of imA =
50.0 PSI is correct as is, it is not used in the Pressurizer 1
Prosaure Narrow Ran0e Channel i Calibration surveillance '
procedure. The fador is for information only and should not be irWorpreted as an en0ineerin0 conversion equation.
Hem b)The notes and drawing do reflect the NU condalons, as '
well as, what scope Westinghouse Nuclear Energy Systems (NES) and NU/AE were responalble for. The drawings provide useful information and are soooptable to NU.
Alanhanna laval ndlaria do nei arrJw hara na thle la not a Peled 2/10/9s 237;8e PM Paes 2 or 3
Northeast Utuities ICAVP DR N' DR*P84*
Minstorm Unit 3 Discrepancy Report on.oropant consMion.
. ..f ; ne ma.s i,:. uut u v. em ma ow.o.m c.nem atu vm em n im p.amastO v. @m n u un, eto v. @m n
inanen s.wn.v.E. # " W" " ""'
0 VT t,ase: Rehaps,RelD vi Men soh.Nor, Den K mc ch na: sm, Ar="' "
O g g Deh:
O b O 11/18/97 st. canon.se.: Hem a): ICAVP finds the NU response not soceptable.
The l&C and/or Operations Supervisors authorizing and verifying the calibration require a d6 rect link to the current Amendment of the Technical Spoolfications from the l&C Form.
The ICAVP does not dispute the fact that the acceptance ortleria for the surveillance is in mA, nor, that the test techniolan does not perform any conversions. Since the three quoted Noms in the Technical Specification Manual are based on Amendment 114, Amendtnent 60, and Amendment 96, therefore, without a reference to an En0ineering Calculation and hs revision number, the basis of the conversion to the Technical Specification value can not be verified.
The SETPOINT REFERENCE, as used on the Form with a general reference to TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS Table koms, wkhout a Specific En0i neering Calculation reference or the actual en0ineering conversion equation, does not provide a link to the cunent Technical Spoolr6 cations, We recommend that this be reevaluated and incorporated as an adion hem in the next Calibration Procedure review cycle, hem b): Response acceptable. However, in our opinion from a human fadors standpoint, this adds confusion to the information presented.
/
Prtre d 2/1640 2:18.01 PM P.go 3 or 3
ICAVP DR No, DRW34388 l Northeast utstles umstone Unit 3 Discrepancy Report neview oreg: Acews,d hopenen On neactuTmWAccerTeo newtow element: unireenance Procedwe l Dioevano:ia "*" O va F . :, Type: Caledsmen g 8, f - i f&A ,
Nnc signiaceneslevel: 4 Date faxed to NU: 3 Deie Puldished: 1Of3097 ,
DNY: Containment Prosaure . Calibrot6on Data Convers6on (Discrepancyfor LoopLMS*PT936)
Daerwelen: The ICAVP reviewed the followin0 documents in order to evaluate the containment pressure Eneirmered Safety Feature .
Actuation function setpoints.
References:
- 1) FSAR Figure 7.21, sheet 8, Rev.6
- 2) Procedure 3447A01, Rev.4, Containment Pressure HI 1,2,3
' Channel Calibration f
- 3) l&C Form 3447A01 1, Rev.4, pages 11,15,16, and 17 of 38
- 4) Technical Specifications Manual. Table 3.3 4, items 1.c and 2.c Amendment 60, items 3.b.3 and 4.c Amendmord 129, Nem 4 7.d Amendment 89 in recelsw ing these documents the ICAVP identifies the following discreps;cks: ;
e) The use of the Engineering Unit Conversion Factor shown in the Reference 3) Data Sheets, titled "SETPOINT REFERENCE 8', will not convert the calibration data to the acceptable setpoint value shown in Reference 4).
2 SETPOINT
REFERENCE:
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS (TS) Table 3.3 4, item 2c, 3.b.3), and 6.f, (TRIP SETPOINT <=8.0 pig, <=8.0 palo, <=8.0 psio, resp.):
1 mA=3.75 PSI (from Page 17 of Data sheets).
For example in order to convert the calibration data of 10.040 mA (from Pape 17 of Data Sheets) to a pressure value'end compare it with an acceptance c.! erla contained in the TS of
<=8.0 psig the following calculations must be performed:
1 mA=3.75 PSIA: .
Pressure Transmitter (PT936) Calibrated Range: 8.0 to 20.0 mA for 15.0 to 60.0 PSIA (from Pape 11 of Data Sheets);
Calibrated Pressure =[(mA 4)X3.75) 14.7 = 7.95 (psiO).
b) Reference 1) Functional Diagram contains is Notes. Notes 7, 9,10,12,13,15, and 17 include statements that do not refied the MP3 as-built configuration. ,
neview vand invand Needed Date inmisser sensee, V. E. O O O ***7 Prtnied 2/1ses 2:1s2s PM Pese 1 or 3
- ,,r aw y ,-v-me-,,----r* v.-w~, w-- ---,+-c -.sw-----,.,-.-----wvew.e,--,,-,.e.-~.1.- #,o-+-v - .------,e- -w w w c y , -.c-,w-,=--ww-w---va--,-tr-y4
BCAVP DR No. DR4P34246 Northeast Utuules Minstone unu a Discrepancy Report vr Lose RWo.m D 0 0 0 2" YT Mgri schapter,Osn K O O O araser unc chmn: 64nsh. Anand K O O O 10757 Date:
swAue:
Dek: 1/30/96 nasoLUTloN: Disposition:
Hem a)The 1 mA=3.75 PSI reference value is for information only and is nd an engineerin0 conversion equation. N simply reistes currorH to pressure such that, if the current input chan0es by 1 mA than the pressure output will chan0e by 3.75 PSI.
Therefore, the factor 1 mA=3.75 PSI of referonos 3 is corToot.
The Containment Prosaure Hi 1,2,3 Calibration Check procedure does not require the test techniolan to perform any conversions. The socoplance orMeria for this surveillance is in mA. When the current value reaches the allowable valus and the bl stable trips within the procedure acceptance orMerta ran0e '
the instrument passes item b)The Functional Diagram leeue was identified during the recent 50.54f FSAR review. NU tooognized that they are responsible for all elements on the Westinghouse fundional diagram (NU drawing 25212 30001. SH4009). However it was decided that the note (s) provide helpful information by identifying those elements that were part of the Westinghouse Nucioar Steam Supply System (NSSS) supplied packa0e versus the elements that were part of the NU or (Archited En0ineer) AE scope of supply. The notes and drawing do refied the NU conditions from the NSSS vendor persptotive as well as what scope Westin0 house Nuclear Energy Systems (NES) and NU /
AE were responsible for. The drowings provide useful information and are acceptable to NU.Sionificance Level crMeria do nd apply here as this is not a discrepent condition.
Concluelon:
item a)The factor in the i&C Form 3447A01 1, Rev.4 of imA =
3.75 PSI is correct as is. N is not used in the Containment Pressure Calibration procedure. The fador is for information only and should not be interpreted as an en0i neering conversion equation
.Nem b) The nNos and drowing do refloot the NU conditions, as well as, what scope Westin0 house Nuclear Energy Systems (NES) and NU/AE wors responsible for. The drawings provide useful information and are ac:eptable to NU..slenifloanoe Level crMeria do not apply here as this is nd a discrepant condition.
Prevteudy teenumeoy Nu? U Yee @ No NonDiscrepentConmuon?U Ya @ No P+PenmastO v. @ Ne --unreewastO va @ No neview inleister: seines, v. E. "" "" W " ""d*' ""'
D D D =
VT Lese: Reheim, Rel D G D D m vr M,r: eehope.r. Don K IRC Chmn: singh, Anand K Prtnled 2/1848 2.ts:31 PM EMN Paes 2 or 3
M No, MM64 Northeast utstles BCAVP ;
Milletone Unit 3 Discrepancy Report ame: 1/ Muss at. conne*: Hem a): ICAVP finds the NU response soceptable. 1 The 14C and/or Operations Supervisors authorizin0 and vertfying i the cal 6bration require a direct link to the current Amendment of the Technical Specifications from the l&C Form.
The ICAVP does not dispute the fact tiest the sooopanoe criteria ,
for the surveillance is in mA, nor, that the test techniolan does not perform any conversions. Since the three quoted Moms in the Technical Specification Manual are based on Amendment 60, Amendment 129, and Amendment 89, therefore, without a reference to an Engineering Caiculation and its revision number,
^
t% basis of the conversion to the Technical Specif6 cation value can :wt be vertfled.
The SETPolNT REFERENCE, as used on the Form with a General reference to TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS Table 4
Items, without a Specific Engineering Calculation reference or the actual en0ineering conversion equation, does not provide a link to the current Technical Specifkations.
We recommend that this be reevaluated and incorporated as an action item in the next Cal 6bration Procedure review cycle.
Item b): Response acceptable. However, lit our opinion from a
. human factors standpoint, this adds confusion to the information presented.
i Pined 2n(W9s 21sm PM Papa 3 of 3
l
[ ..
ICAVP DR No. DR MP3 0262 Northent Utilitle3 Miiistone Unit 3 Discrepancy Report Review Group: Confleurst% DR RESOLtmoN ACCEPTED h
Heview Element: System IMM m D6ecipune: P;pirg Design Ow Discrepency Type: Instmuse6an implementean g SystemProcess: SWP NRC sigrd6cance level: 4 Date faxed to NU:
Date Putdlehed: 9/29S7 L
D6screpency: Walkdown discrepanc.es for the SWP in the Auxiliary Building Descript6on: The following discrepancy items were found during the walkdown
- of the piping and merAanical equipment of the SWP in the Auxiliary Building:
- 1. Instrument line 3SWP-PDI 164B shown on isometric EK-
[ 512177 Rev i does not have a 1 in, offset in the tubing at the second bend from valve 3SWP*V868 as shown on the drawing.
- 2. Instrument line SSWP*PS69B is mits.no support H002 (BZ-612A 130) shown on isonistric drawing EK-512023.
- 3. Restricting orifice 3SWP*RO121B has no NU component tag.
1
[ 4. Lines 3-SWP-030165-3 and 3-SWP-030-186-3 have i abandoned welded support attachments on their end caps that e are not called out on isometric drawing 3-SWP-23 Sht 5 Rev 7.
- 5. Lines 3-SWP-004 404-3 and 3 SWP-004-405-3 are insulated but not required by Spec. SP ME-691. ,
- 6. Vent and drain lines with valves 3SWP*V818, *V814, and
- V815 are capped which is not as shown on drawing CP-319712 Sht 3 Rev7 and P&lD EM 133B Rev 34.
- 7. Valve 3SWP*MOV71 A (*V29) has insulation missing and no Work in Progress tag visible in the area.
- 8. Line 3-SWP 150-103 3 insulation as required by spec is missing.
- 9. Line 3-SWP-150104-3 insulation as required by spec is missing.
- 10. Line SENP-003-1bO-3 has about a 2 ft. section of Insulation rrdssing-
- 11. Line 3 SWP-003-365-3 has about a 4 ft. section of Insul.ation missing.
- 12. Line 3-SWP-150-105-3 has no insulation as required by spec.
- 13. Line 3-SWP-150106-3 has no insulation as required by spec.
The following material condition items were found during the
- walkdown of the piping and mechanical equipment of the SWP in the Auxl!iary Building:
Printed 2/16/9e 219:ce PM Pope 1 of 4 q
- (
l
ICAVP DR No. DR-MP3-0242 Northeast Utilities Millstone Unit 3 Discrepancy Report
- w. m
- 1. Valves 3SWP*V70, 'V71, N40, and N41 packing h leakage and the flange bolts are rusted.
- 2. Valve 3SWPN64 packing shows leakage.
- 3. Valve 3SWP*V668 packing shows leakage.
- 4. Restricting orifice 3SWP*RO121 A has no NU component tag and insulation at its flange is damaged.
- 5. Flow element 3SWP*FE43A insulation is damaged.
- 6. Valve 3SWP V857 packing shows leakage.
- 7. Valve 3SWP*V853 packing shows leakage.
- 8. Valve 3SWP*V972 bolts are rusted.
! 9. The connectlun of the instmment valve 3SWP*V207 line to line 3-SWP-024-304-3 shows leakage.
i Review verd invahd Neederl Date initiator: Reed, J. W. Q Q Q W16A7 VT Leed: Neri, Anthony A 9 O O *1657 l VT Mor: schopfw, Don K 9 O O cr22/s7 l lRc Chmn: singh. Anend K Q Q Q Sf2597 Date:
INVAUO:
i Date: ?]10/98 RESOLUTION. Disposition:
NU has concluded that the issues reported in items # 1 through 9 under' Material Condition"of Discrepancy Report, DR-MP3-0262, nave identified condit'ms not previously discovered by NU which require correction. Trouble reports have been generated to schedule and repair these items. Item #4 had its label hung on 7/27/97 per OA-9. CR-M3-97-3376 was written to provide the necessary corrective action to resolve this item.
These items are scheduled to be completed post startup. The i issue of overall " Material Condition" was addressed in IRF M>
l IRF-00385 in response to On MP3-0042.
NU has concluded that the issues reportad in items # 2, 3,5,7
! through 15 under' Piping and Mechanical Equipment"of Discrepancy Repost, DR-MP3-0262, have identified conditions l not previously discovered by NU which require correction.
l Trouble reports have been generated for items # 7 through 13 to l schedule and repair these items. Item # 3 had its label hung on 7/27/97 per OA-9. Item # 5: Une number 3-SWP-003-404-3 (Not 004 as on DR) and 3-SWP-004-405-3 are continuations of line 3-SWP-004-102-3 which is insulated. Une number 3SWP-003-404-3 is in the lina designation talSe as being insulated. Une number 3 SWP-004-405-3 will be added to the line designation table.
Une 3-SWP-004-102 3 is listed in Specification SP-ME-691. Une Printed 2/1696 2:19:13 FM PeGe 2 of 4
l Northeast uusin ICAVP DR No. DR4P3 4262
- ministone unit 3 Discrepancy Repor*
3-8WP 003 404 3 and 3-8WP-004 4 ,6 3 will be added to T+:#-::^!:. 8PME 401. CRMS 97 3376 was wettlen to provide the necessary corrective action to resolve these issues, hem # 2 has been correded per AWO WMS-97 20397, the remainder will be completed post startup.
NU has concluded that the issues reported in Hems # 6 under '
" Piping and Mechanical"!?'-;.-a-fof Discrepency Report, DR-MP3 0262, has idenufied conditions previously discovered by NU which rsquire corredion. This discrepancy was previously identified on UIR 1312 - A.13, A.11 and A12 which have been corrected per AWO #MS 9616000.
NU has concluded that the leeues reported in hems #1 and 4 under" Piping and Mechanical Equipment"of Discrepancy Report, DRMP3-0262, do not represent discrepent conditions, hem # 1:
The elimination of the offset is technically acceptable and in accordance with the tolerance of plus/minus 3' as delineated in Specification SP EE 212.
Nem #4: The welded support attachments art noted and depided on shoot 1 of the piping isometric, they are shou on sheet 1 to have tracability of the field welds.
Conclusion:
Nu has concluded that the issues reported in items # 1 through 9 unu " Material Condition" of Discrepency Report, DR-MP3-0262, have identified conditions not previously discovered by NU which require correction. Trouble reports have been Generated to schedule and correct these issues. CR-M3 97-3376 was writtaa to provide the necessary corrective action to resolve these items. The issue of overall " Material Condition" was addressed in IRF MS-IRF-00365 in response to DR-MP3-0042. These items are scheduled to be completed NU has concluded that the issues reported in items # 2,3,5,7 through 13 under "Pipin0 and Mechanical Equipment" of Discrepancy Report, DR-MPM262, have identified conditions not previously discovered by NU which require correction.
Trouble reports, label requests and the line designation tables chan0es will resolve tWd issues. CR-MS 97-3376 was written to provide the necessary corrective scuon to resolve this item. Item
- # 2 has been corrected per AWO #MS-9740307, the remainder
-will be completed post startup, NU has concluded that the issues reported in items # 6 under "Pipin0 and Mechanical Equipment" of Discrepancy Report, DR-MP3-0262, has identified a condition previously discovered by N') which requires corredion. This discrepancy was previously identified on UlR 1312.
NU has concluded that the issues reported in items #1and 4 under " Piping and Mechanical Equipment" of Discrepancy Report DR MP3-0262, do not represent discrepant conditions, hem # 1 is in accordance with Specification SP-EE-212 and item
- 4 is documented in Note 1 to the isometric drawing.
Pmtously idenused by NU7 Q Yee @ No Non F ,- ^ ConmHon?U Yes @ No Pnnkd 2/1646 21915 PM Page 3 or 4
Northeast Utilities ICAVP DR No LW3 0262 Millstone unit 3 Discrepancy Report p% P.amnetO va @ u. n mm
- maetO va @m n.*w initiator: Reed, J. W.
MW Neeeed Dale vr Leed: Nwl, Anthony A G O O 2 tim vr u,r: iwa, r, o.n x 0 0 0 2 rim O Q O 2/im me Cn n: sm An.no x - O l O La 4
om:
elComments:
F s
i i
4 i
l i
4 Pa0 4 of 4 l Ponted 2/1m 219-15 PM i.
I
ICAVP - DR NS DRW34314 -
Northeast Utilities Millstone UnN 3 Discrepancy Repoft Review Group: Programmenc DR REsoLLmoN ACCEPTED Revlow Elemesd: correcove Assen Procese 3*
O Yes Diocespancy Type: correceve Acson syseenWProcess: N/A
@W pagc signiacance level: 3 Date faxed to NU:
Date Putdished: 10f1047
~~
Discrepeneyt inconsistent initiation of Adverse Condition Reports (ACRs)/
Condition Reports (CRs) oseeripeton: During our inview of the corrective actions taken for ocndMions adverse to quality found during the Unit 3 Confl0uration Mana0ement Plan Project, we noted an inconsistent initiation of ACRs or CRs for condMions which had been originally identified on Unresolved item Reports (UIRs). Note 1.3.10 of instruction PI 14, Revision 0, titled "Confl0uration Management Plan Project Process Administration instruction" states: "A CR will be -
generated to address issues of a repetitive or programmatic nature as determi ied by EP (Expert Panel). RP-4 'Corredive Action Program,' provides guidance on specific issues potentially -
affecting personnel safety, plant safety, or the proper operation of plant equipment that must be considered for a CR and brou0ht to the attention of the Shift Mana0er (SM). Where specific questions arise as to the need for a CR, EP will refer to RP-4 for additional Guidance."
The following examples of situations when a CR should be initiated are Diven in Attachment 3 to RP 4, Revision 4:
Programmatic issues En0ineering pr00rammatic issues such as MOV issues and Fire Protection inues Regulatory issues Inaccuracies in information previosly reported to the NRC.
Based on this guidance, many conditions reported on UlRs sh0uld have been evaluated by the ACR/CR process. The ACR and CR processes have trend coding and, basad on the Significance Level, causal evaluation and action to prevent recurrence which will be important to maintaining plant configuration in the future.
The followin0 four UIRs are examples where CRs should have been initiated:
UIR 2281 This UIR expressed the concem that there were safety and environmental screenings for procedure changes which have not been performed. In addition, the delay of the screenings which were specifically identified until after startup has not been justified.
UIR 1907 Printed 2/1646 2:20'00 PM Page 1 of 5 I
Northe:st Utiitties' ICAVP DR No. DR4P84314 ,
i_ uisistone unit 3 Discrepancy Report
! This UIR identified penetrations that were not being drained in
- '- violation of the UFSAR. The licensing and potential safety
{ implications should be addressed, s UIR 1945
. This UlR stated that no surveillance procedure was found for
, testing valve interlocks which are descritni in the UFSAR This
- is a programmatic issue.
l UIR 1539 L
I This UiR identifies a conoom that the UFSAR commMments regarding environmental qualification of components in mild i environments are not being addressed in the Electrical
! Environmental Qualification Pmgram. This is a programmatic
- _ issue.
F F Finally,ite following statement has been made in some ACRs i and CRs: 'ACR inhiated by management directive for all startup l rei 'ed issues." This directive has not been consistently applied
! as evidenced by the fact that many UIRs are identified as startup L related without an ACR or CR having been generated, i
. A clearly defined and consistently applied criteria is lacking for l- the generation of CRs from the UlR process. Allemately, there'
- l. appears to be no process for trending or taking action to prevent recurrence for items identified in UIRs which do not resuN in generation of CRs.
Review vand invabd Needed oste
{- Insistor: Wmne,s.P- 9 O O- w24e7 vit.ead: Ryan.Thomme J B D O 52457 VT Mgr: schapk, Don K B D 0 om IRC Chmn: Singh, Anend K B D O toraso7 omae:
l WWAUD:
ones: 2.9/98 RESOLUTION: Disposition NU has concluded that the issue reported in Discrepancy Report, DR MP3-00314, does not represent a discrepent condition. S&L believes there is inconsistent initiation of Adverse Condition Reports (ACRs)/ Condition Reports (CRs) for conditions which had been originally identified on the Unresolved item Reports (UIRs).When Millstone Unit 1 was shut down for their refueling outage in 1935, the Design En0ineering Manager wrote ACR-7007 to address Licensing Basis (LB) and Design Basis (DB) i issues. As a result of this ACR 7007, an Event Review Team was formed to perform a root cause and to determine the 1 corrective acilons. The corrective action process started the
Northeast Utilities ICAVP_ DR No. DR4P34314 Mill: tine unit 3 Discrepancy Report L8 and DB of Unit 3. Unit 3 management wrote CR-MS 97 1839, June 18,1997 to better define the corrective actions process. Unit 3 mana0ement used the Unresolved item Report (UIR) and Open item Report (OlR) process to enter the corrective action plan of the (ACR)/ (CR) Pl.14 procoes. This
. process allowed the reviewer and/or supervisor to question Operability /Reportability The option was always available to write an ACR/CR aGainst the subject UIR/OIR. In some cases, ACR/CR's were written along with LERs. Durin0 the screening process by the Export Panel (EP), if a EP member found a condition that was deemed repostable or effects o,* bility or issues of a repetitive or programmatic nature then . ACR/CR was tu be written.When the project is completed, the corrective actions will be si0ned off through AITTS to established completion of the corredive e* ion alon0 with trendin0 data and historical information.
The subject UiRs 2281,190 , ' 945, and 1539 were reviewed by the Expert Panel (EP) and t . Jportabliity or operability ur repetitive or progt .mmatic issues were identified. UIRs are entered into the A Aion item Trackin0 and Trending System (AITTS). A CR MS 97 3552 was written on the UIR screenin0 review as the conservative approach to address the foer UIRs.
The CR's approved Corrective Action Plan (CAP), which is attached, was to have the Expert Panel re-review these specific UlRs and recommend any further action. The EP determined that no further action is required on any of these UIRs, for the reasons cited:
UIR 1907 There is a pre-existing CR which had been initiated -
on this issue. A Pl 20 closure packa0e on this issued was '
completed under AR 97017823-01. Attached is the UlR 1907 Closure Request Report and FSAR Change Request FSARCR .
97-MP3-274. FSARCR 97-MP3 274 clarifies the lineup, ventin0 and drainin0 of the RSS system for the Type A leakage rate test.
This FSAR upgrade doe 6 not change the method of conducting the Type A test for the RSS system, clearly states the system lineup. The chan0e will eliminate the uncertainty that caused the issuance of UIR 1907.
UIR 2281- No Operability or Reportability issue has been identified here. This prD0rammatic issue is of historical interest
' only.The EP evaluators did not believe screenin0 of the historic SP's was necessary because more were no oprability or reportability issues only a p.c;,rammatic issue of historical
- Interest. New changes would follow procedure DC 1
' Administration of Procedure and Forms' for Safety and Environmental Screening with every procedure / form change.
UiR 1945 - There is no operability issue here, as not doing a test of an iederlock described in the FSAR does not make that interlock, or the component it is a part of, inoperab6e. No Technical Specification testing was missed. It should be noted that a separate program review (96-01) was initiated to confirm ESF related circuit testing demonstrates adequate overlap.UIR 1945 Closure Request Report conclusion stated the following:
"UIR 1945 identifies several valves in the safety injection and recirculation system that do act periodically check permissive valve irderlocks However. the valves are operated when the PMed 2n696 220:06 PM Page 3 or 5
Northe st Utilities ICAVP _ DR No. DR MP3 4314
- Millstone Unit 3 Discrepancy Report
' permissive' valves are property aligned. it's not appropfiate to purposely align permissive valve (s) incorrectly and attempt to
, open/close a valve that shouldni move (i.e.: perform *negetive" testing). The fact the valves move when the permissive limit switches are satisfied is sufficient testing."
UIR 1539 - EQ is not required for
- mild' em4ronment l
components. No Technical Specification issue was involved.
There is no Reportability or Operability question involved.UIR i 1539 Clo - Request Report disposition and conclusion stated the follwnng: *FSARCR 97 MP3 591, issued 1/9/98, revised l FSAR section 3.11B.2.2 to clattfy that safety-related electrical l equipment located in a ' mild
- environment, are not within the l
scope of the EEQ program, per 10CFR50.49(c)(3)." and " Based upon the following disposition, safety related electrical equipment located in a ' mild
- environment need not be environmentally qualif' Mxt (EEQ) for
- harsh
- environments."To l
provide consistent reviews to the Configuration Management Program (CMP) evaluation PI-15 was written. Pl 15 was a
! diagnostic tool to find week spats by performing a Vertical Slice
! (VS) of selected systems. During this VS time frame there was a management directive to write ACR/CRs for all UlRIOIR VS startup issues.
I The four UlRs 1907,2281,1945 and 159 listed a bove were not VS lasucs, therefore, the management directive v.d not apply. Significance Level criteria do not apply here as this is not a l discrepent condition.
Conclusion i
NU has concluded that the issue reported in Discrepancy Report, DR-MP3-00314, does not represent a discrepent condition. The i subject UIRs 2281,1907,1945, and 1539 were reviewed by the Expert Panel (EP) and no reportability or operability or programmatic issues were identified. CR M3-97-3552 was wrttten on the UIR screening review as the conservative approach to re-address the four UIRs. The EP re-reviewed the four UlRs and determined that CRs were not required as part of the PI 14/20 review process. Significance Level criteria do not apply here as this is not a discrepent condition.
l Previounty ident' n .eJ by NU? O Yes @ No NonDiscrepentCendHon?@ Yes O No n ion nPenenetO vs. @ N. no.maionuna.*ed?O vos @ No
- n. vie.
Acceptable Not A~M Needed Dale
!' VT Lead: Ryan, Thomas J VT Mgr: Schopfer, Don K wtc chmn: Singh, Anand K Does: 219/98 sL comments: The response to this DR is acceptable for the UIRs listed herein. ,
Although specific UIRs documentad in the DR were only
- exarnples, other concems, if any (relative to NU not issuing an ACR/CR as a result cf a UIR), were documented separately by I
Printed 2nW9e 2mc6 PM Page 4 or 5 i
= ,__
Northeast Utilities ICAVP , DR Na, DR MP34314 milietone unit 3 Discrepancy Report ,
the reviewers as required.
I PrNed 2/1648 2200 PM Paes 5 of 5 1
i
. ~ . -- .- . -- . - . . -- .- .-.. - - _ - .
ICAVP DR No. DR-MP3 4340 Northe:st Utilities Millstone Unit 3 Discrepancy Report Review Group: Syelem DR RESOLUTtoN ACCEPTED 2
Diecrepency Type: NW Desi'" 05 gg systemerocess: N/A NRc sigruacence levet: 4 Date faxed to NU:
Date Pulmehed: 11/22/97
~
' E =:; :E Suppott Loads on BZ Drawings Deecription: Support loads shown on BZ drawings ( Pipe Support Details ) do l not reflect the latest loads from Pipe Support Summary used in the pipe support calculation. Pipe Support Summary is a part of i latest stress calculation. This is a generic issue.
Following are the few sample Drawing Nos.
12179-BZ-19A 20 5 12179-82 198-42-4 12179-BZ 739B 219-3 Review vand invand Needed Date initMon Patel, A. O O O 15'14/87 O O '17/'7
"'5 87 IRC C : singh, Ar# K O O O
.a:
I - INVAUD:
Date: 2/13/96 Resolution. NU has concluded that Discrepancy Report, DR-MP3-0340, has identified a condition not previously discovered by NU which requires correction. This discrepancy meets the criteria specified i
in NRC letter B16901 and 17010. It has been screened per U3 PI-20 criteria and found to have no operability or reportability concems and meets the Unit 3 deferral criteria. CR M3-98-0515 has been written to develop and track resolution of this item per RP-4.
Previ%ety identiced by NU? O Yes @ No Non Descrepent Condluon?Q Yes @ No ResoiutionPending?O vee
- No Roeoi=tica un, iv.d?O v.e @ No Revie.
3 p .' - . " " Not Acceptable Needed Date O 2tieme VT Leed: Nort, Anthony A O O y 2/1$9e v7 Mer: schapeer, con K O O O mm atC Chmn: Singh, Anand K O O O Dek: 2/13/98 ~
- st Communio
- The proposed resolution was accepted based on the following clarification provided in the referenced CR:
The forces and moments and in some case reactions at attachment points shown on the BZ drawing were used for information only during construction. There is no requirement to keep these values current and when the BZ PeGe 1 of 2 Pnnted 2/16/96 2336 PM i
a Northeast Utilities ICAVP DA" No. DR-MP34MrJ Millstone unk 3 Discrepancy Report drawing is affected or updated now, these values are removec.
The loads in the calculation govern as the lornds of recoM, r
Y t
PrNed 2/1656 2 2030 PM Page 2 of 2
Northeast Utiitties ICAVP DR No. DR MP3-0979 -
unilatone Unit 3 Discrepancy Report noview omap: system DR RESOLUTION ACCCPTED noview Element: system Design Diecipane: Mechaniced Desig" P': - , .:, Type: Coniponert Date Om systenWProcese: Hvx gg NRC sientacanoe level: 4 Dede faxed to NU-Date PutWtehed: 10/23/97 Diacrepancy: SLCRS Vent Stack isolation Valve Classification Eo / ' ~ During review of the component data for the Supplementary Leak Collection and Release System (SLCRS) a discrepancy regarding the safety classification of valve 3HVR*V42. Valve 3HVR*V42 is an isolation valve located in the OLCRS discharge line at the Unit i Vent Stack.
FSAR Section 6.2.3.1 states that the SLCRS is classified as a QA Category 1, Safety Class 3, and Seismic Category 1 system.
[
I The Plant Design Data System (PDDS) database identifier valve ;
3HVR*V42 as a QA Category 2 component. The PMMS database identifies valve 3HVR*V042 as a QA Category 1.
Seismic component.-
Specification 2190.430-339 Addendum No. 3 Identifies valve 3HVR-V42A as a 18' ASME Section lil, Class 3 butterfly valve located in the Unit i Vent Stack. Vendor drawing 2179.430 339-103C identifies valve 3HVR*V42 as Nuclear Safety Reisted 18' butterfly valve.
PDDS shows a valve description # of W1015-B-4 for 3HVR*V42.-
This valve description number is not identified in specification
- 190.430-339.
Review vand invaad Needed Date initiator: SW M. D. - 0 0 0 10/37 -
VT Leed: Nort, Anthony A Q O D 10/7/97 VTle er: schapser, Den K g g [ 10/14/97 NtC Chmn: singh, Anand K
@ Q "Q 10/18/97 Date:
j INVAUD:
Date: 2)6/98 RESOLUTION: NU has concluded that Discrepancy Report, DR MP3-0379, has identified a condition not previously discovered by NU which requires correction. This discrepancy meets the criteria specified in NRC letter B16901 ans 17010. It has been screened per U3 PI-20 criteria and found to have no operability or reportability concems and meets the Unit 3 deferral criteria. CR M3-97-3879 has been written to devebp and track resolution of this item per RP-4.
Attachments:
CR-M3-97 3879 m_- ,,, am ( ) v- re) m -r-- - - , - or 3 v. re> m Printed 2/16/9812194 PM ~ Pepe1 or 2
'd Northeast Utilities ICAVP DR No. DR MP3 0379 Millstone Unit 3 Discrepancy Report w- yw , _
W ---- --
g - - - = g neemm=P.amaarO va @ no noem em une et O va @ u.
n laitietor Stad, M. D, VT Lead: Nerl, Anthony A O E O #
O ' I ##
VT Mgr: Schopfer, Don K j mc chmn: Singh, Anand K O Date:
< si. m
- m i
e N
k I
r i
I I
i l
l 1
1 i Printed 2/1m 22126 PM PeGe 2 of 2 l
L
' Northeast Utilities ICAVP DR No. DR MP3 0391 Milistone unN 3 Discrepancy Report Review Group: b;alem DR RESOLUTloN ACCEPTED Review Element: system Design Diecipline: Mecherkel Dwign m: . niType: NW O vm systemProcese: sWP gg NRC W W :4 Date faxed to NU:
Date Pubilehod: 1W1847 h :r. Desi0n input document to calculations could not be found in the NU system.
Ducetythm: Letter NSI-91450, Rev.1 daw 1 17 92 is referenced as a design input to calcuations 90-0601116-M3 and calculation FSE/SS-NEU 's 4. This documem was deemed as not in the NU system by MelRF 00381.
Review Velhi invelld Needed Date initieter: Dionne,8. J. G O O $w357 VT Lead: Neet, Anthony A @ Q Q 1077/97 VT Mer: Schopfer, Den K G O O $0/1457 IRC Chmn: Singh, Anand K G O O 10/1457 Date:
INVALID:
Date: 2/16/98 RESOLUTION: Desposition:
NU has concluded that this report DR-MP3-0391, does not represent a discrepent condition.
A copy of document NEU-91850, rev 1, was obtained from the Westinghouse Site Service Manager (SSM) and is attached to this IRF. Significance Level criteria do not apply here as this is not a discrepent condition.
Conclusion:
NU has concluded that this report DR MP3-0391, does not represent a discrepent condMion. .
A copy of NEU-91650 was obtained from Westinghouse and is transmitted per this IRF. A copy of NEU-91650 has also been given to NU Records Management for entry into NU Records Management.
Previously identiaed by NU? O Yu @ No NonDiscrepentCondition?@ Yu U No m eene.orO v= @ No n + une= tvedt O v a @ No Revi Initiator: Dionne, B. J.
VT Lead: Nort, Aeony A VT Mgr: Schopfer DonK ire ch-n: sm w K Date:
st Conenents:
PrWed 2/1W9e 221:36 PM Page 1 of 1 l
Northeast Utilities ICAVP D" St. DR-MP3 0392 Ministone unit 3 Discrepancy Report .
Review ereup: Gyetem UR RESOLUTION ACCEPTED Review Element: system Design -
Diecipane: unchenloei "*'
O vee F . p Type: N% gg y sy ^r :sWP NnC signNicence level: 4 Date faxed to NU Dele Pubilehed: 10/2347 r" . my: Design document to calculations was noted to not be a valid calculation number by NU.
r= . Calculation XXXXX 36-PS,' Calculation of the Atmospheric Pressure which Colncides with Minimum Low Water Level at M6ilstone Station", dated 11/10/92 was referenced as a design input to calculations 90 0691065-M3 and FSE/SS-NEU-1964.
The referenced calc. number XXXXX 36-PS was deemed as not being a valid calc. number by M3-lRF-00428, neview
-vand inveed Needed Date initiator: Dionne, s, J. G O O 10/3'87 VT Laod: Nort, Anthory A E O O 50/787 VT Mer: schapter. Don K Q Q Q 10/1497 ute chen: singh, Anand K G O O 0/ise7 Date:
DNAUD:
Dese: 2/16/98 nesotunON. Disposition:
NU has concluded that .e issue reported in Discrepancy Report, DR MP3 0392, does not represcnt a discrepant condition. NU's MS-IRF-00428 response that Calc No. XXXXX-36-PS ir " a valid calc number was incorrect. Calc No. XXXXX 36-Ps valid NU Environmental Programs Branch calculation whw .ias been maintained in that department's filet it has recently been transmitted to Nuclear Document Control for entry into the NU PASSPORT Controlled Documents system. Significance Level criteria do not apply here as this is not a discrepent condition.
Conclusion:
NU has concluded that the issue reported in Discrepancy Report, DR-MP3-0392, does not represent a discrepent condition. NU's M3-lRF-00428 response that Calc No. XXXXX-36-PS is not a valid calc number was incorrect. Calc No. XXXXX-36-PS is a valid NU Environmental Programs Branch calculation which has been maintained in that department's files. Significance Level criteria do not apply here as this is not a discrepant condition.
Previously identmed by Nu? O Yee @ No No,,'" _ ,:
- Condtion? 9 vee Q No P+ PenanetO y- @ Ne ~ % unr=
- edt O v a @ No
- n. view initiator: Dionne, B. J.
VT Leed: Nort, f. ehony A vr m er: se .ser. Don K E O O =
IRC Chmn: Singh, Anand K Prveed 2nese 2acs Pu eeg. i or 2
ICAVP DR No. DR MP34392 l Northeast Utilities l
Miiistone Unit 3 Discrepancy Report
. . _ . . , - ~ "
l O O O Dese: 2/16/98 l
SL commenes: Although thJ missing calculation was retrie)ed from the Environmenf al Programs Brant:h filts, other calculations in the'r files may be referenced in other documents and for other systems which are not in the Nuclear Document Control System and should be.
Printed 2/16/96 2:22-09 PM Pa0e 2 of 2
Northeast Utilities ICAVP DR No. DR MP3 0413 Millstone Unit 3 Discrepancy Report Review Group: system DR RESOLUTION ACCEPTED -
Review Element: Syelem Deelen DiscipNes: Erwimnmnental ouellfication O y=
En , ni Type: Corrponent Due gg SysterWProcees: SWP NRC signNicence level: 4 Date faxed to NU:
Date Published: 12/1497 D6ecropency: Environmental Zone Discrepancy in Specifecation No. 2362.200-164 Deectlption: The Procurement Specifkation No. 2362.200-164 for Motor Operated Valves lists the environmental (EQ) Zone for the motor operators 3SWP* MOW 1 A,B as Zoce AB-07 (Paoe 14 of 26, Amendment 1). However, from the Millstone databases PDDS, EQ Master List, and the drawings Nos. 25212-21001 shi, and 25212 21004 shi, the location for motor operators 3SWP* MOW 1 A,B is EQ Zone AB-09. This is a discrepent condition.
The review of both EQ Jones show that t!i e environmental conditions are the same for AB-07 and AB-09 only during normal conditions only. During accident conditions, the maximum temperature in Zone AB-09 reaches 210 F and stays constant from 10 sec, to 2500 sec. after the accident.
The EQ conditions in Zone AB-07 is less harsh than AB-09. The expected maximum temperature in this EQ Zone AB-07 will not exceed 200 F , from 20 sec, to 30 sec, after the accident.
The review of the Limitorque motor orerator Test Report No.
B0056, Rev,0, dated 1/11/1960 for 3SWP*MOV71 A,B shows that the equipment is capable of maintaining its environmental qualification in both Zones AB-09 or AB 07.
The inconsistency between the procurement specification and the PDDS, EQ Master List and Drawings appears to be a documentation discrepancy.
Review Vehd inveNd Needed Dele initiator: Yeesin, S. O O O 11/2847 VT Lead: Neri, Anthony A B O O 11/2as7 VT Mgr: Schopfer. Don K G O O $2is/s7 IRC Chmn: Singh, Anand K O O O 2es7 Date:
INVAUD:
Date: 2/10/96 RESOLUTION. Disposition:
NU has concluded that Discrepancy Report, DR V.P3-0413, has identified a condition not previously discovered by NU which requires correction. This discrepancy meets the criteria specified in NRC letter B 16910 and 17010. It has been screened per U3 PI-20 criteria and found to have no operability or reportability I concems and meets the Unit 3 deferral criteria. CR M3-98-0136 I has been written to develop and track resolution of this item per RP4.
Conclusion:
Prtnied 2/16/96 2 22 34 PM Page 1 or 2 l
ICAVP DR No. DR MP3 0413 NortheOst Utilities .
Millstone unit 3 Discrepancy Report NU has concluded that Discrepancy Report, DR MP3-0413, has identified a condition not previously discovered by NU which requires correction. This discrepancy meets the criteria specified in NRC letter B 16910 and 17010, it has been screened per U3 PI 20 orMeria arW found to have no operability or reportability concems and meets the Unit 3 defenal criteria, CR M3-98-0136 has been written to develop and track resolution of this item per RP-4, Previouesy he.neened by Nu? Q Ya @ No NonDiscrepentConmuon?O Yes @ No n iuii P.noas?O va @ wo n wumenunr= wad?O va @ wo n.vi inteletsr: Yeeein, S.
VT Leed: Nort, Anmeny A VT hier: Schopfer, Don K O O O mm IRC Chmn: Singh, Anand K Dele:
st Comments:
pw Printed 2/16516 222:30 PM Page 2 or 2 i
N:rthe:ct Utilities ICAVP DR No. DR MP34416 Miiistone Unit 3 Discrepancy Report Revlow Group: Syelem DR RESOLUTION ACCEPTED Review Element: Syelem Design Diecipane: Erwironmnental QuellAcetion Discrepancy Type: Component Date Ow
. systerWProcese: Rss g
Ie NRC s;?^ u-2 levet: 4 page faked to NU-Date Pubilohed: $2/1N97 06ecrepancy: Environrnental Parameters Discrepancy in SpecirK:ation No.
213.050476
Description:
The Procurement Specification for Safety Related Motor Operated Valves (MOVs) does not list the expected environmental conditions or the response spectra as required by the FSAR.
The Millstone Procurement Specification No. 2282.050-676 does not list the expected environmental conditions associated with the procured safety-related Class 1E motor operated valves (MOVs). FSAR Section 3.11B.2.2 require that all Class 1E equipment specifications define at least the worst case envelope service conditions anticipated for Olass 1E electrical equipment.
Also, the Required Response Spectra at the equipment locations are not provided in the specification per the requirements of FSAR Sections 3.10 and 3.118.1.1.
The review of the equipment qualification (EQ) Test Report (l.imitorque Report No. B0058, Ref. No. RSS-A.2-0003) confirmed that the motor operators are environmentally qualified to the boundin0 environmental and sels,nic parameters at the coulpment locations.
The lack of the required information in the Procurement Specification appears to be a documentatiori discrepancy.
Review vand invand Needed Date initiator: Yemein. S. G O O- 15/2ss7 VT Lead: Nort, Anthony A G O O iii2es7 VT Mgr: Schopfer. Don K G O O 12/ sis 7 IRC chmn: Singh. Anand K O O O 12/ss7 Dese:
INVALID:
Date: 2/10/98 RESOLUTION: Disposition:
NU has concluded that Discrepancy Report, DR-MP3-0416, has identified a condition not previously discovered by NU which requires correction. This discrepancy meets the criteria specified in NRC letter B 18910 and 17010. It has twen screened per U3 PI-20 criteria and found to have no ope" My or reportability concems and meets the Unit 3 defer # ia. CR M3-98-0136 has been written to develop and track n , . tion of this item per RP-4.
Conclusion:
Printed 2/16S6 2 23:07 PM PeGe 1 of 2 l l
l
Northeast Utilkies 1CAVP DR No. DR MP3 0416 l-o milistone unit 3 Discrepancy Report NU has concluded that Discrepency Report, DR-MP3-0416, has identified a condMion not previously discovered by NU whkti requires corredion. This discrepency meets the cruerta specified in NRC letter B 16910 and 17010. It has been screened per US PI-20 criteria and found to have no operability or reportability concems and meets the Unit 3 deferral criteria, CR M3-96-0136 has been written to develop and track resolution of this hem per RP-4,
~
Previoudy wenunes N of ut Q Yee @ No . Non D6ecrepent Conmuon?Q Y= @m p-% PenmastO va @m e - % unt=*.e70 va @ wo noview Intitotor: Yeeein, s, VT Lees: Neri, Anthony A D D **
O O VT Mgr: schopfer, Den K
))
1RC Chmn: singh, Anand K O O O Date:
SL Commente:
Printed 2/1tW96 223:11 PM Pope 2 or 2 l
Northeast Utilities ICAVP DR No. DR 44PWM Mmstone unit 3 Discrepancy Report newt waroup: syneem Dn mesottmoN ACCEPTED noview seement: system Design Discipene: Erwironmnental ousanno" C: ;- iType: Componard Dale O v.
e, : - m Rss @h NRC signiscence lowl: 4 - Date Faxed to NU:
Date Puhashed: 11497
~
F :i. Discrepancy in the Database PDDS Ducription: The review of the Millstone Database PDDS Indicates that certain fields are missin0 or have incomplete information.
The database PDDS does not list the information about the environmental qualification (EQ) zcne or the model number for each of the following components:
3RSS*FT38A,and B3RSS TE28A,B,C,D.
Also, the PDDS does not contain the model number for the each of the following components:3RSS*LE22A1,A2,and A33RSS*t.E22B1,B2,B3, newww Vaud invoud Needed Dele inittster: Yeeein, s. G O O 10 tis'7 VT Leed: Nat, Anthony A O O O 10/1457 VT Men schop#er, Don K O O O tor 20e7 unc chmn: singh, A,nend K Q O O 103 987 Date:
INVAUD:
Dels: 2/10/96 nesOLUThoN: Disposition: -
NU has concluded that Discrepancy Report, DR MP3-C426, has -
identified a condition not previously discovered by NU which requires correction. This alscrepancy meets the criteria specified in NRC letter B 16910 and 17010, it has been screened per U3 PI 20 criteria and found to have no operability or reportability concems and meets the Unit 3 deferral criteria, CR M3-98-0217 has been written to develop and track resolution of this item per RP-4,
Conclusion:
NU has concluded that Discrepancy Report, DR-MP3-0426, has identified a condition not previously discovered by NU which requires correction. This discrepancy meets the criteria specified in NRC letter B 16910 and 17010. It has been screened per U3 PI-20 crtteria and found to have no operability or reportability concems and meets the Unit 3 deferral criteria. CR M3-98-0217 has been written to develop and track resolutlori of this item per RP-4.
Previously identesed by NU? U Yes (#) No NonDiscrepentCondition?O Yes (#) No PM%Pending?O vos @ No PMihaniunresolved?O Yes @ No Revtow
. - , y , a,-riana,a* Not We Needed Date Printed 2n696 223A6 PM~ Page 1 or 2
ICAVP DR No. DR MP34426 l Northeast Utiikies l Millstone Unit 3 Discrepancy Report
, EG; L,Q4 O O o
O a
2i m n . %.oon x a 2< =
RC Chmn: Singh, Anand K !
Date:
SL Conenents:
PrWed 2/16 Ale 2;7J:50 PM Page 2 of 2
Northe st Utilities ICAVP DR No. DR MP3 0602 Millstorm Unit 3 Discrepancy Report Review Group: system DR RESOLUTION ACCEPTED 8Y "" D"*" Potentialopwebuuy law
- ' "r=_., Machw . *si
- O va FM , .;p Type: Coruponent Dele gg syseerwProcees: oss NRC signiacance level: 4 Date faxed to NU:
M eF 44ehed: 12/7/97
~
Discrepancy: Specification SP-ME 784 does not specif, 5 Jite controlin accordance w/ FSAR Section 6.1.1.1, Dactiotion: FSAR Section 6.1.1.1 states that delta ferite d is in accordance with Regulatory Guide 1.31. P y Guide 1.31 requires that the delta ferite content of test 1 - Nsits from each lot and each heat of weld filler metal pm.. d for the welding of sustenttic stainless steel Class 1 and 2 components be verified for each process to be used in production, Valve specification SP-ME-784 Revision 2 does not address delta ferite analysis. This design specification is utilized for procurement of the following valves according to the plant computer data base, PDDS: ,
Quench Spray System Motor Ope,iited Valves:
30SS*MOV34A,B Containment Recirculation Spray System Motor Operated Valves:
3RSS*MOV20A,B,C D 3RSS*MOV23A,B,C,D '
Note that the following specifications do include requirements for delta ferrite control in weld material:
2214.602-040 Revision 6 2472.110-185 Revision 1 2275.001023 Revisloq 3 '
2362.200164 Revien 1 2282.050-153 Revision 3 2282.150-154 Revision 2 2214.802-044 Revision 1 2214.80'+-020 Revision 5 2472.210190 Revision 3 2332.910-669 Revision 3 Review vaad invahd Needed Date initiator: Feingold. D. J. O O O 11/18/97 VT Lead: Nort, Anthony A B O O 1 '1587 VT Mgr: Schopfer, Don K G O O 12tlis7 IRC Chmn: Singh, Anand K G O O 12tariri Date:
WVALID:
Date: 2/9/98 Printed 2t1W9e 2 24M'" .
Pa0e 1 of 2
ICAVP DR No. DR.MP3 0602 Northeast Utilities Miiistone unit 3 - Discrepancy Report putson.unv* Wion*
NU has concluded that the issue reported in Discrepancy Report DR MP3-0602 does not represent a discrepent condition.
A review of the SP-ME 764 Indicates that NU did indeed addross Delta Ferrite issues in sodion 2.5.2 titled " Materials". This section required Material compliance to ASME Sedion lil Article NX' 2000 requirements. WeldinD & Brazino Materials are addressed in ASME Section ill Article NX* 2400. In particular this is covered in NX* 2433 titled " Delta Ferrite'.
S40 nificance level criteria does not apply as this is not a discrepent oondition.
Conclusion:
NU has concluded that the issue reported in Discrepancy Report DR MP3-0602 does not represent a discrepent condition.
A review of the SP-ME 764 Indicates that NU did indeed address Delta Ferrite issues in sedion 2.5.2 titled ' Materials". This section requires Material compliance to ASME Section lil Article NX' 2000 requirements. Welding & Brazing Materials which are addressed in AGMF Sedion lli NX*-2400. In particular this is covered in NX* 2433 titled " Delta Ferrite".
Significance level crMeria does not apply as this is not a discrepent condition.
Previously Montened by Nur O Yas @ No NonDiscrepentConeuenr@ Yes U No p-+ PenmastO va @ N. m unr=
- edr O va @ No
- n. view InlLator: Feinpoid, D, J.
VT Lead: Nerl Anthony A VT Mgr: schopfer. Don K 1RC Chmn: singh, Anand K O O Date:
SL Comments:
Printed 2/16/96 2:24:26 PM Page 2 or 2
- DR No. DR MP3-0629 Northe:st U%s - ICAVP '
Millstone una 3 Discrepancy Report Revieve Group: Programmelic DR REsoLUTtoN ACCEPTED Revtow Element: Correme Acmon Process
"*""*: '"' O vee D6ecrepency Type: Llooneine Documort G No systerwProcome: N/A NRc signiacence levet: 3 Date Faxed to NU:
Date Putdlehed: $2/847 Descrepency: LERs Need to Cite Generic Implications Descripeaa: In LER 97-043-00, NU reported to the NRC that they had discovered that they may not have property tested the P 11, P- '
12, and P 13 interlocks for the ESFAS and RPS systems. In LER 97 033-00 NU reported a non-conservative setting for the P-6 B! stable reset value which resulted in a condition where it is possible for the intermediate Range Neutron Flux, P-6 interlock to be bypassed and the Source Range Neution Flux monitoring instrumentation not re-energized and operable. In LER 97-045-00, NU indicated a discrepancy with regard to RPS response time testing. In all of these LERs the cause was indeterminate.
This DR is concemed with the fact that all of these LERs relate to inadequacies in RPS and ESFAS testing and, in the LERs, NU has not presented a discussion of the genericimplications of the eventa. Such a review is required by NU's corrective action process and the ICAVP would expect to see it reflected in the LERs.
Review vend invend Needed Date inteston Bennett.L. A. O O O it/20s7 VT Lead: Ryan. Thomas J G O O sii20s7 O O 52iiio7 VT u er: schopfer. Don K O O 12i+s7 IRc counn: sineh AnendK G O Date:
INVALID:
.n.-
Date: 2/11/98 RESOLUTM Disposition:
NU has concluded that the issue reported in Discrepancy Report, DR MP3-0629, does not represent a discrepant condition. The requirement for a review for generic implications is contained within RP-4, Corrective Action. RP 4 requires each Condition Report (CR) to be reviewed for generic implications, it is through the RP-4 corrective action process that LERs are initiated. Therefore, every LER is also documented on a corresponding CR. Any generic reviews are completed and documented in the associated CR. LERs report the specifics of one event only.10CFR50.73 only requires that similar events at the same plant that are known to the Licensee be referenced in the LER. The review of generic implications is handled in the Corrective Action process during the review and resolution of CRs. For the LERs noted in this Discrepancy Report, LER 97-045 was documented in CR M3-97-1829, LER 97-043 was documerded in CR M3-971899 and LER 97-033 was Page 1 or 3 Printed 2/1646 2:25:00 PM
DR No DR.MP84829 Northeast Utilitin ICAVP_
Ministone unit 3 Discrepancy Repoft ,
documented in CR MS 971647(all attached). Each of these CRs addresses "simnar saumions = oe,rb impiiemione in part 3 of Section 5 of the applicabio CR form. Pro 9tammatically, RP 4, Corrective Action Program, has two levels of review for generic implications to other unas by the Corrective Action Depaitment and the Multi-Discipline Mana0ement Review Team.
Addnionally, guidance is provided in RP 4 for Mana0ers that -
- have responsibility to answer specific Condhion Reports when reviewing an6 resolving the Corr *ltions, such that, the extent of condtion and applicability across departmert or unit innes is identified as needin0 consideration.
The larget issue that these specific LERs are related to is not just testin2 of RPS and ESFAS but veibetim ccmpliance with technical specifirations in the area of surveillance proceduros and testin0. Attached is a copy of CR MS 97 2002 which contains a Common Cause EvaluatLtn of Numerous Surveillance related CRs written from 1/1/96 on surveillances betweSn 1/12/96 and 8/13/97. The Common Cause investloativa grouped the CRs into several cate00 ries, the major ones being:
- Procedure discrepancies that revien should have caught
- Tracking and scheduling deficiencies .
- Trig 0er information not complete
- Technical Specification non-compliance.
- 181 Program deficiencies As a result of the recommendations of the Common Cause Evaluation, AR 97015977 42 was generated to develop a plan to perform an independent review of a statistical sampling of each ?
departments psocedures to ensure that they demonstrate both intent and IMetal compliance with the Technical Specifications.>
While each of the referenced CRs addressed generic
- implicaQns for other NU plants, an earlier review of the .
Tocht cal Specifications and surveillances related to a CR has 1 resulted in one of the LERs(97-033) referenced and several changes to surv964ance procedures have been initiatec' via the review process. A further review in light of the ongoing program was not warranted.
Si0nificance level criteria do not apply here as this is not a discrepent condRion.
Conclusion:
NU has concluded that the issue reported in Discrepancy Report, DR-MP3-0629, does not represent a discrepent condition. The requiremerd for a review for generic implications is contalryxl within RP-4, Corrective Action. RP-4 requires each Condition Report (CR) to be reviewed for generic implications.
Every LER is also documented on a corresponding CR. The LER is not the appropriate place to review generic implications. For the LERs noted in this Discrepancy Report, LER 97-045 was documented in CR MS 97-1829 LER 97-043 was documented in CR M3-97-1699 and LER 97-033 was documented in CR M3 Page 2 or 3 Prtreed 24tW982:25:o4 PM
ICAVP DR No. DR MP34429 Northeast Utilities ministone Unit 3 Discrepancy Report 1647. Eadi of these CRt address 'Similar SMustions or Generic implications
- In part 3 of Section 5 of the applicable CR form.
I Programmatically, RP 4, Corrective Action Prtes tam, has two levels of review for generic implications to other unMs by the Corredive Action Department and the Multi-Discipline Mana0ement Review Team. AddMionally, guidance is provided in RP 4 for Managers that own Condition Reports when reviewing and resolving the CondMions, such that, the extent of condition and appl 6catd44ty across department or unM lines is identified as needmg consideration, Sionificance level crMeria do not apply here as this is not a discrepent condMion, pr.mumy wenna.oy Nur o Yu @ No Non Descreped conmuen?@ Yu Uh n muone.nanotO Y= @ No namuonunr dtO va @m w=
accepseue Not ^~Yh Neud Date m, ,
G O O mm VT Leed: Ryan, Thomme J ,
=
VT Mgr schopfer, Don K G O O unc chmn: singh, Anand K D*: 2/11/98 sL commode: The Ucensee's response is acceptable, however the Licensee should consider issuin0 supplemental LER's to document the cause(s) of events when they are Inillet!y documented as indeterminate and then subsequent cause(s) determination is made.
Printed 2/16m6 225:c5 PM Pege 3 or 3
DR Noa DR MP3 0637 Mast UtW60s . lCAVP -
umstorm unit :-- Discrepancy Report Moview Grong: opwesens & Maintenanoe end Teetne DR RESOLUTION AcCEPTBo Review Element: Operseg Procedwo pescapane: c O vee C, i Type: O 4 M & T Precedwe
,swP gg s .n NRc signBacence triel: 4 pote faxed to NU:
Date Pubilohed: 11/2497 oleerePancy: MOVs 36WP MOW 1 A(B) are not included in the control room rounds valve lineup verification.
osecription: Technical Specification 4.7.4 requires that.*At least two service water loops shall be demonstrated operable: At least once per 31 days by verifyin0 thet each valve (manual, power-operated or automatic) servicine safety-related equipment that is not locked, sealed or otherwise secured in poshion is in its correct position.
Contrary to this, safety related valves 38WP* MOW 1 A(B) are not included on the Control Room Rounds sheet of the
- Service Water Train A(B) Valve Lineup Verification' surveillance procedure checklist, OPS Form 3626.1-1(2). These motor operated valves have position indication in the control room and
' therefore would fall under Section 1.2 (General Instructions arid Guidance for Equipment Control), paragraph 4 of Equipment Control procedure OP 32608 and should be listed on pa0e 6 of 6 of the aforementioned forms.
A sea;th of the procedure database could not determine any other procedure or surveillance form where this requirement is satisfied or documented, neview vend Invend Needed Date intuator: Temlyn, Tom E- O O 1 87 YT Lead: Base,Hea B D D 11 m 7 vT Mer: schopfer, Den K G O O 1'1057 UtC Chmn: singh, Anand K G O O - Siriem7 pose:
INVAUD:
osse: 2/13/96 RESOLUTION: NU has concluded that Discrepancy Report, DR MP3-0637, has identified a condition not previously discovered by NU which requires correct 4n. This discrepancy meets the criteria specified in NRC letter B16901 and 17010. It has been screened per U3 PI-20 criteria and found te have no operability or reportabliity concems and meets the Unit 3 deferral criteria. CR M3-96-0166 has beer. written to devslop and track resolution of this item per RP-4.0 OOContinuationO O
Conclusion:
0 NU has concluded that Discrepency Report, DR-MP3-0637, has identified a condition not previously discovered by NU which requires correction. This d6screpancy meets the criteria specified in NRC letter B16901 and 17010. It has been screened per U3 PI-Printed 2/16Se 2:2721 PM Paes 1 or 2
- M No M W8*87 Noethemet utstk3 iCAVP Miiinton. Unit 3 biscrepancy Report 20 criterle and found to have no operetnMy or reportately concems and rnests the Unit 3 deferral ortterte. GR MS 96-0196 has been written to develop and track resolution of this Mem per RP 4.
- 7..ce;wenunes er wt U v. @m hunsneerepentcondmentU yes @m h=% P adinstO y. @ we mu- dto v. @m Review y p, g, 6 Not As*@ Needed One U U U VT Leed: tems,kan O "
VT Men Shphr. Den K
" O
- mcca.nni w e,AnansK O O
one SL conenedei
=
Pfwed 2ntW98227;36 PM PeGe 2 er 2
M No. M-MP3463 ICAVP -
_ Northeast UtlHties Discrepancy Report -
Millstorie Urdt 3 DR REsoLUTeoet ACCEPTED Review Group: System p g j ReYlew fiement: Byelom DeWyn O vn Dkelpaae: Ele **cd D* Wen gg (Mectopency Type: 1. kenning Documord symemtrocese: HVX Date faxed to W NRC tegnancwelevd 4 Date F_L -td 12/2o97 ' "
~ '06*uePeacy:
Operation of EDG Enclosure Supply Fan B does not match descriptionin 3DBS-EDG-001 Deectlpuon: Back0round:
Paragraph 8.5.1 af l'.e Design Basis Summary Doca.went (DBSD) 3DBS EDG-001, dated 5/28/97 states:
The supply f ans for the EDG enclosure t e is shall automatically st when the EDG comes up to speed and enclosure tempera ur above the set temperature...
Discussion:
Diesol Gencretor "A" Enclosure Ventilation Supply Fan
{3HVP*FNt A) operates as defined in the Isolate" Panel (FTSP) control is in the ' switch Remote
- located Supply Fan A position. Note: on the Fire Transfer has no similar ' Remote-Isolate
- contrci switch, f
if the ' Remote-Isolate" switch is in the
- isolate" position, the an will not .tspond to enclosu;e temperature.
Conclusion:
The DBSD description of Supply Fa B operation is not com This was verifkxi by a review of the following drawinos:
Elem Diag 480V MC Diesel Generator ESK-6ABG Rev 10 A Enriosure Ventitation Supply Fan [3HVP*FN1 A]
Elem Diag 480V MC DieselGenerator ESK6ABH Rev 08 B Enclosure Ventilation Supply Fan [3HVP'FN18) 125V DC Emer Diesel Gen Stop Ckt ESK-08KD Rev 12 i
3EGSA03 DEGS*G-A]
125V DC Emer DieselGen Step Ckt ESK-08KG Rev 12 3EGSBD3(3EGS*G-B]
Control Switch Con; ct Diagram ESK 3AB Rev 03 Control Switch Contact Diagram ESK 3C Rev 11 Rev6ew Date Needed Valid invand $2/4S7 0 O initiator. Womer.1-0 ewisT emo42na.o z2e e m
DR No, DR MP3 0443 ICAVP l Northeest Utilitie. Discrepancy Report uliiston Unit 3 '25S7
- n.,i, A.:-v ^ O O O tatttro7 vi t vi w en sa.ps.,, con x 0 0 O D 2 6S7 mechmn: sm. AnandK O D omie:
aNAub; D.4e1 2/12/96 nssotUTioN: Disposition:
NU has concluded that the issue reported in Dr.*P3-0663 does not represent a diwepent condition.
ConcluJon:
NU has concluoad that the issue reported in DR.MP3 CS63 does not represent a discrepant condition. 3DBS-EDG 001 is the DBSD for the Emergency Diesel Engines. The operation of the ventilation fans is described in Section 6.0, Key System Parameters & 12.0, Component Fundions and Design Requirements, as supporting equipment. Their operation is described in the normal operating mode only as related to the operation of the EDGs. Comp!!ance whh Appendix R program requirements is a separate issue, and is adequately covered in numerous other documents, the conclusion reached in the DR was that the DBSD Description of EDG Supply Fan B operation is not complete.
Review of the DR and supportha documentation Indicates that the DR is worded incorrectly in that the 'A' f an start /stop/ auto logic contains the additional circuitry for operation from the fire transfer switch panel, not the *B' fan, as the DR states.
The Auto Stad permissivos for the A EDG enclosure ventilation supply f ans,3HVP*FNI A&C, are manually byparsed during an
- ferring control to the Fire Appendix R Control Room fire 03 Transfer Switch Panel (3CES*PNLFTSP) to ensure that Ventilation Supply Fans A & C are available. The intent of the switches at the Fire Transfer Switch Panel (FTSP) are to isolate any controls in the control roora that could spuriously operate (due to fire damage) and render the fans inoperable. This will ensure the f ans ate avaltable, to be manually started from the FTSP, to r,upply cooling to the 'A' EDG enclosure. Isolation of the auto start circum is appropriate durtnc this emergency mode of operation.
The DBSD is not intended to describe the difference in operation of the supporting HVAC system when the HVAC system is operated for a Control Room (Appendix R) fire. The DBSD for the EDG1,is discussing a normal operating scenario for the DG HVAC as it supports the DG, it does not 90 into the level of I detail for operation of the ventilation fans during abnormal events, Inor is it intended to go into that level of detall). This Page 2 or 4 FW*ed 2/M96 2.29 53 fW
Northust Utilitin DCAVP DR h.D w s4643 Misistorm Unit 3 Discrepancy Report mode of operation for the fans is a minor part of their des 40n, and as such, is not needed in a summary document for the D6esel Generators.
As stated in the Projed instruction (Pl 29) used to develop the Desion Basis Summary documents, the DBS is to ' focus on the safety related and/or risk significard functions of the system and its components necessary to accomplish the safety and/or risk si0nif6 cant fundions" Attachment 3 provides the DBS layout and wrMin0 r-hT;C ...(from Scotion 1.1). Further, The content of Section 8.0, MEY SYSTEM PARAMETERS, is defined in Attachment 3 as 'This baction identifies and summattres the key system parameters that are established to se'irfehe plant nooident analysis (FSAR Chapter 15) identified in $c ilon f ' 0 and the performanos critetta identif6ed in Section 4.0." This is clearly reiterstod in Section 8.0 of the subject DBS which states
". This
.. section identifies and summertres the key system parameters establ6shed to support assumptiorm of the F8AR Chapter 15 Accident Analysis identified in Section 11.0 of this DBS...'
It should also be rooognized that this DBS does addreas fire protodion and manaalated requirements. Spoolfically, Pl 29 defines fire proledion as a Topical Area to be addressed in Sedion 5.0 of the DBS Relative to 3DBS EDG 001, fire protection is addressed in Section 5.0 and appropriate references provided.
This sedion references the Tire Prdection Program Manual" (FPPM) and the "MP3 Fire Protection Evaluation Report" (FPER). The FPPM establishes the fire protodion policy for the protodion of structures, systems, and components (SSCs) important to safety and the personnel, procedures, and equipment required to implement the pro 0 ram. The FPPM further referonoes the Technical Requirements Manual, whloh provides a table of Fire Related Safe Shutdown Components and associated Surveillance 6, which, for fans 3HVPYN1 A & 10, is operation from the FTSP. The FPER represents the ~
operatin0160ense fire protection pro 0 ram submital for the Northeast Nucisar Energy Company's MP3. Section 7.2 of this document ,
- Emergency Diessi Generators", states that to mill 0ste the potential conesquences of a main control room disabling fire,"...Lacal circuit teolation and fan control for HVP*1 A,1C(sic) is provided at the fire transfer switch panel".
The Appendix R Compilance Report further details the fan control from the fire transfer swMoh panel.
Based on the above, Desi0n Basis Summary 3DBS EDG 001 is considered to have the appropriate level of detail consistent with Projed Instruction Pt 29 and no further adion is required.
In addition to the drawin0s referenced in the DR, reference Lcgic Dia0 rams LSK 22 7A & 22 70.
Since this is not a discrepent condition, the Significanos Level 3 deficiency does not acolv.
Peted 2nel9s 2:2964 PM Pese 3 or 4
Northeast UtilNies iCAVP M No M*84888 Millstone unn 3 Discrepancy Report r..< =; i e w mur o v e= m.non P c itev u n.
n luel.n P.nenerO v @ u. n hei. nun, e etO v @ w.
n.wi Insel.a.r W.m r, t.
" " b VT L e: N.rt, Archeny A O O O Fi m vi neon sehe,se, o.n x 0 0 0 2/im ac ew sw. An.na x Det.:
el C.nyn.nt.:
l 1
4 Print.d 2/1690 2.29 56 PM Page 4 of 4
I ICAVP DR No. DRW8488 Northeast utsties Mmeterm unit a Discrepancy Report
( notisw e,.e,: P,e,em e onnasownow Accamo Review element certeesve Aston Process piessen =3 Meen.*=a comen
"""dOY=
(" .. ., Type: certedive Achen g s,1 - oss leeC signIReenselevel:3 onte faxed hla): .
Oak Puhtehed: 12/r47
-r . v Material Change for Casing Wear Ring on Work Order Mb86-03700 Ossertsmen: During a review of closeout of Deal 0n Deficiency Report (DDR) 00296, it was noted thd DDR 296 was closed out to UNSAT No.
UNS 3040. PMMS work order MS-86 03700 (which is included in the closoout documentation for UNSAT 3040) Ind6 cates that a material chan0e (from CD4MCU to Brass) was made to the casin0 wear rings for SQSSPSA. No evidence in the supporting documents provided ind6 cates that a design change was FE-:::::1 The material change to brass is contrary to the approved Design Specification (Spec. No. 2214.602-040 Addendum No. 8 dated 5/30/79) and the Vendor data (Goulds Pumps) shoot and drawing N23673482 Rev. 2 contained in OlM-040001 A, which state th6t casing wear nngs shall be CD4WCU, hardness 240 SHN.
Review vond invahd Needed Deh inalaten Neerto,Ma* Q Q 12M47 Q
VT Lead: nyon,Thamme J G O O 12't *7 VT Mgr schepeer. Den K O O O $2/187 wie chen: ainsh. Anans K O O O 12'3*7 ones:
INVAUD:
Date: 2/9/98 nasownoN: Dispostion NU has concluded that the issue reposted in Discrepancy Report, DR MP3-0886, doorr not represent a discrepent condMion.
Additional informellen at'oched to this response indicek - that the installation of a brass wear ring in pump QSSP3A was temporary and was performed during startup to prevent pumpbiruling during system flushing. UNSAT 3040 indicated the pump PSA Impeller had bound up durin0 pump coastdown due to dobrts entrainment in the wear ring. UNSAT 3040 was
- N by UNGAT 3046 for conective action. UNSAT 3046 provided for final disposition by replacing the stainless steel rin0 wh a temporary brass ring, ond reinstalling the stainless steel ring following system flushin0. Installation of the temporary brass ring was performed as part of AWO M3 85-03700.
- = Reinstall 6ng the stainises steel ring and retuming the pump to the --
original desien was performed under AWO M3 85-04703.
Sionif6cance Level crMoria do not apply here as this is not a discroport condulon.
Conclusion ~
Prvees 2 ness 2:30.27 Pu Pese 1 or 2
_ _ - - _ \
Northeast Utilities ICAVP D M .DR 4P3 W 8 umstone unit 3 Discrepancy Report NU ha concluded that the issue reported in Discrepency Report, DR MP3-0645, does not represent a d6scropont condMion. Brass wear rin0s were installed on pump QSSP3A only as a temporary action during plant startup. The corred stainless steel rin0s were reinstalled following completion of the system flush.Slonif6cance Level ortleria do not apply here as this is not a d6screpent condMion, r../ P;inumhed by Nuf Q Vm @ No Non Dhampant Condame?@ Yu - Q No neeshaien PenmaetO v. @ No -u wed, Oyes @ No neview We Not Acceptehle Needed Date m %, y VT Laod; Ryan, Thomas J VT Mgri Schapler, Den K O O O **
1RC Chmn: Singh, Anand K Date:
SL Conenente:
l Prned 2/1s982:3031 PM Pe0s 2 ef 2
Northeast utsties ICAVP DR No. DRW8491 Millstorm Unit 3 Discrepancy Report n W ow seems sysism DR maoumoNacCsPTBo nMow piement: svetem Design Diesepene: EinemselDee*"
Deserepeney Type: ceioutenen O vee systendPresses: nsa g ,__
Nno signinemme level: 4 -
Dese PAXed to NU:
Done Puldiohed: 12/2097 r . -,: Setting of Cuntaintnent Recirculation Pump Motor Protective Relays (Calcutellon 400CA)
Deeceipoten: Calculation 409CA selects the settings of the containmord tourculation pump motor (SRSSP1 A, 3RS8*P18, 3RS8'P1 C, and 3RSC*P10) protective relays. The Millalone 3 FSAR, Sedion 8.3.1.1.4 (Design Critetta), item 6a states that the Class 1E motors should be able to start at 70% of rated volta 0e unless specific justification is provided. However, Calculation 400CA demonstrates coordination between the motor startin0 curTent as a fundion of time and the relay characteristic at 100% and 80%
vonape only. Therefore, the calculation does not demonstrate that the motor could start at 70% voNa0e without being tripped off by the protodive relays, it is necessary to demonstrate proper relay coordination at 70%
voltage to ensure that the containment recirculation pump motors can start under all conditions under which they wouki be required to operate.
VeW tevehd Needed Date innester: stessie, o. weism G O O $2/4*7 VT1.and: Nat, AnWieny A O O O 12@D7 VT Mgr: schopfer, Den K G O O 12/1187 me en : sinen. Anonu K G O O 12/1**r Date:
INvauo:
Date: 2/13/98 MacumoN. Disposition:
NU has concluded that Discrepency Report DR MP3-0691 has -
Identified a condition not previously discovered by NU which sequires cortection.
Information provided in the motor data sheet (Calculation NL-033, Rev. 3, pape 30 of 72) documents the sooeleration time of a fully loaded RSS motor, at 70% volta 0e as 3.2 seconds.
The motor starting cunent curve for 80% voka0e is plotted in Calculabon 409CA, and this curve also indicates a start time of 3.2 seconds. Sinoe the starting currett of the RS8 motor at 70%
volta 0e is less than that at 80% voltage, the existing 80% cunent curve in Calculation 400CA is conservative or more bounding .
than the 70% currorW curve would be.
Plottin0 the 70% motor currett curve would demonstrate more Pnnled 2/190s 2MS4 PM , Page 1 or 2
Northeast Utilities ICAVP DR No. DR4P3J4H uittatone ur* 3 Discrepancy Report >
i l
than adequate coordinatix with respediv) protective devices.
Calculation 409CA needs to be updated to include the etartin0 current at 70% voNage. The correction adlon plan for CR M3 98 0470 has been approved to update Calculation 409CA post siartup.
Since the conclusion of the calculation has no effed on the design basis, NU considers this to be a significance Level 4 t issue.
Conclusion:
HU has concluded that Discrepency Report DR MP3-0691 has ident;fied a condition nd previously discovered by NU which !
requires correction.No coordinat60n problems exist between starting the motor at 70% voltage and the circult's protective devices. The approved correction action plan by CR MS 96-0470 will revise Calculation 409CA.
Since the conclusion of the calculation has no effed on the desl0n basis, NU considers this to be a Signif! canoe Level 4 issue.
Previoudy Wa* sed by NUF Q Yu @h hn D6ecuped owunnon?U Yu (#) W ne=*aw PeamnetO Ya @m - unra dv.dr O ? = @w neview Innistor: Womer. l.
VTLeed: Norg Anthony A O O O =
VT Mer: schapter. Don K LAC cienn: Sk10h, Anand K O O Date:
el Comments:
)-
1 1
Prtreed 2/1646 2.30.5e PM Pe0s 2 of 2
iR ICAVP DR No. DRW84760 Northeast UtWtles Mmeterm ut* 3 Discrepancy Report moview Gree: Operamens a MeNomence and Teseig On nts0LtmoN AoCEPTED noview tamment: opersorg Precedwe Oleolpune: Eleseteel Dos **
O vee Oteorepensy Type: O s M s T Precedwe gg s,1. . . - m Hvx Nnc sigsdecanos le*sel: 4 Does faxed to NU:
Date Puheshed: 1/1oes r . a Operator actions are ussd to compensate for design defiolencies.
Desertpalen: The Operating procedure for Auxiliary Building Heatine, Ventilation and Air Condtioning directs the use of a "Dod6cated Operator" in the evert that a Safety injection signal (818) or Containment Depressortastion Actuation signal (CDA)is received or antioirWed. The "Dediosted Operator" is directed to open a panel circum proaker to allow the Train A fan to respond automatically.
One of the two Auxiliary Building Filter Trains is required to operste durin0 accident condRions, it would be during this critical time that Opergline resources and attention would be diverted to compensate for desl0n deficiencies.
The normel operating precedure for Auxiliary Buliding Heatia0,
- Ventlietion and Air condnioning states that *3HVRTN6A is the profoned Auxiliary Building filter fan. If the following condMions are present, SHVRTN6A will not start automatically:
- 3HVRTN68 running and fails but does not trip
- erg.::M Safety Features (ESP) actuation signal is present.
In order to have 3HVRTN6A respond to the ESF actuat6on si0nal (which is either the SIS or CDA aduation alonels) tha
- Dodicated Operator
- is directed to open 38CV"PNLSP, circut 11 breaker. This will result in closure of 3HVR* MOD 268 and an -
automatic shutdown of SHVRVN68, allowino 3HVRTN6A to respond to ESF actuation signal."
The use of the " Dedicated Operator" to compensate for long standing equipment or design problems is considered an
' operator work around". The use of this " operator work around" does not most industry norms for conservativa operations. S&L considers this to be a #===-;- cip, nev6 w Vand bovend wooded note initiator: Pterventor, R. g g 12/1747 VT Lead: seen. Men @ O O 12/is47 VT Mort schepier, Den K 9 O 12/23*7 Inc caenn: singh, Anand K G O- O $2/31/'7 none:
eNaLED:
note: 2/12/90 -
nasOLUTIoN: Dispoggion:
NU has conduded that Discrepancy Report, DR MP3-0706, has idoidirad a cond# ion previously discovered by NU which requires conodion.An Ergir.::-irs Work Request (EWR) MS-PrNed 2/1ses 2.31:2s PM Page 1 or 2
% _ _o
Northeast Utilities ICAVP DR No. DRws4m Mii6 stone unit : Discrepancy Report ;
96340, Rev.1 wu wrtilen 10/28/96 to modify the control circuits -
of fans SHVRYNSA&B to allow an auto start of fan SHVRTN6A t during an sooiderW (SIS, CDA, or LOP) If fan 3HVRTN68 was i running and then falls. The EWR chan0e is being implemented ty Desi0n ChanDe Roquest DCR MS 96057. The fleid work is to -
be completed prior to startup. The EWR cover pape and DCR are attached. ;
Conclusion:
NU has concluded that Disoropency Report, DR MPS-0708, has !
Identified a condition previously discovered by NU which i requires correct 6on.An Er@::-Ms Work Request (EWR) MS.
95340, Rev.1 and Design Change Request DCR MS 96067 are ,
in place to address S&L conoem. The field work is to be completed prior to startup.
n./ G Monuned by Nut @ Vos V No Non Olewapent conmuon?U Ya @ No a maan p.nenetO v. @m asema nu em.dto Y. @ N.
n innisten spear,R.
9 O m m VTLeed: asse.kan vino en schapser.DenK ;
eic cienn: sm Anand x 0 0 Date: 1/30/98 sL connente: SAL reviewed the Detailed Design and Operational Consideratione in the deci0n chan0e Packa0e for MS 96057. This '
proposed modification should resolve the discrepancy. The response to this Disepency Report is Acceptable.
l Pnnied 2nseu 2 31:2e PM Pese 2 or 2 4
r--nem,. www--n,---.mn--n--m =e ,-,.sn ~n.,--r--w.m------ ,-.-.,.,----..,-,,-,,-,-.n....-.,-,r-,, -.
. --- ,, ,-,,,w,~,--, ww--- , - - - , - -
l Northeast Utilities ICAVP DR No. DR MP3 47;3 Millstone Unit 3 Discrepancy Roport Review Group: System FR RESOLUTION ACCEPTED Review Element: System Desip1 D6eelpmas: Meche*al Dosis" F- , - :y Type: Celeuleman O vos systerWProcese: HVX
@h NRC Signiacanos M: 4 Date faxed to Nu Date PuMiehed: 12/747 r+:' 'CY: Fan 3HVRTN13A/B Pressure Requirements
Description:
During review of the dud pressure drop calculation and fan perfoimance data for charging pump, component cooling pump and heat exchan0er area exhaust fans 3HVRYN13A/B a discrepancy regarding the calculated fan pressure requ!rement and the fan performance reting was identified.
Per specification 2170.430140 and vendor drawinD 2170.430-140 9J exhaust fans 3HVRTN13A/B are rated at 30,000 cfm and 6.5 hag total pressure.
Per calculation PBV 45AG 1 the total pressure requirement fur the fan is 6.69 iwg. The calculation should address the bl0her than fan ratin0 pressure requirements on fan performance, Revtew Yahd invahd Neuted Date initiesor: 8t:ut, M. D. O O O it/22*7 VT Laod: Nort, Anthony A Q Q Q 11/"r47 VT Mgr schopfer, Den K O O O 52/187 unc chmn: singh, Anand K O O O $2/ser Dele:
INvAuD:
Date: 2/6/98 Resolution. NU has concluded that Discrepancy Report, DR MP3-0709, has
, Identified a condition not previously discovered by NU which requires correction. This discrepancy meets the criteria specified in NRC letter 316901 and 17010, it has been screened per U3 PI-20 criteria and found to have no operability or reportability concems and meets the Unit 3 deferral criteria. CR MS 96-0138 has been written to de,mp and track resolution of this item per RP-4.
Attachments:
CR M3-96-0138 Previously identesed boy Nu? O Yes @ No Non06ecrepentCondleien?O Yes @ No Resolutten PendiaerO v.s @ N. - % unr svedr O vs. @ No Revtow AccepteWe Not" - ;'
Needed Dele VT Leed: Nort, Archeny A VT Mgr: Schopfer, Don K -
WIC Chnet: Sergh, Anand K O O Date:
me .
Printed 2/1% '96 2.31MPM Pese 1 or 2 ,
m - - _ _ - - - - -
Northeast Utilities ICAVP M % Mes4m Millstone Unit 3 Discrepancy Report i
i i
i i
Pnneed 2 dew 2.322 PM Page 2 of 2
Northeast UWWes ICAVP DR No. DR MP3 4724 milietone Unit 3 Discrepancy Report meview aroup: system on nasoLUTmN ACCEPTEo neyw risenent: system ossian , ,,,,
piecipens: Mechenleel Dee*
Deseropency Type: NW O v.
s,1..r. 1HVX gg NnC signIIncense inel: 4 Date faxed to NU:
case Puldlehed: 12/2147 oneerepancy: ESF Filter Unn Damper Leakage
Description:
buring review of the supplementary leak col 6ection and release system (SLCRS) and auxiliary building ventilation system (ABVS) flNor unM isolation dampers r discrepancy regarding damperleakage was identified, FSAR Table 1.61, Reg. Guide 1.52, Rev. 2, Position C.3.p exception states " Damper leakage w"I not Imped on the air cleaning effectiveness of the ESF systems.' A calc'Jiation that determines the damper leakage allowable to meet air cleaning effectiveness requirements could not be located, neview Vand inveed Needed Dele inattator: stout. M. D. @ Q O 11/20 S7 VT Leed: Nort, Anthony ^ O O O 12557 VT Mgr: schopfer, Den K O O O 12/5587 inc ces : sm Anans K O O O '2'tia7 cate:
INVaLS:
este: 2/9/96 mesoLUTloN: NU has concluded that the Discrepancy Report, DR MP3-0726, has ;Jentified a condition not previously discovered by NU which requires correction.
Calculations P(B) 1173, ' Air Leakage Through the SLCRS System Isolation Dampers,' and P(E) 1105 " Quantify Charcoal Finer Bank Bypass Leakage During Accident Modes of Operation," provide input to radiological calculation UR(B)-439 "LOCA DOSES to EAB & LPZ Assuming Containment Leakage is into Either the ESF MSV or Aux Building," which was superseded by calculation 86-019 96RA *EAB and LPZ Doses from a MiWstone Unit 3 LOCA.* Calculation 88-019 96RA determined the thyroid dose at the site boundary due to damper leakage, CR MS 97 3274 was inRiated on 9/27/97 to identify potential SLCRS bypese leakage to the environment. CR MS 97-3274 corrective sctlon Iequires an Engineering Evaluation of potential SLCRS boundary bypass leakage and Irnpad on the DBA LOCA dcse limRs. The corrective adion is roquired to be completed prior to startup.
NU concurs with the Sigreificanos Level 4 as determined by DR-MP3-0726. The Engineering Evaluation will provide technical Justification for FSAR Table 1.61 exception to Reg. Guide 1.52, Prtnted 2/1s9s 2.32-30 PM Page 1 or 2
ICAVP DR No. DR MP3 4726 Northeast Utlinies milletone UnN 3 Discrepancy Report Rev. 2 ponMion C.3.p. The evaluation will quantify the damper leakage and determine whether the damper leakage will have imped on the alt cleaning effediveness of the ESF systems.
In addition, DR MP3-0686 Identifies a discrepancy with regard to calculation P(B) 1105 not addressing the leak path throu0h dampers 3HVR*AOD44A/B which bypassos the ABVS filter 4
units. M3 lRF-01376 response to DR MP3-0606 Identified the CR M3 97-3274 corredive sdion to corred the discrepancy.
Attachments: ~
CR M3-97 3274 r.cf fisonmaed W Nut U Yes @ No Non F , " Conmuen?U Yes @ No meeokmaanPenangt@ Yes O w. - % uar wv.dt O ve. @ we Review g,
,' " Net. " .' " Needed Da6e O O O 2*ee v n aed: Nat. Antwy A O O O 2nses n w: se. Den K 2"S*8 IRC cienn: sv. Aiand K O O O O Date: 2/9/98 st. comments: NU's response is acceptable.
The DR is classified as Resolution Pending as the results of the Engineering Evaluation noted in the response are needed to determine the final siorificance level, f
f
l ICAVP M N' M *P88788 Northeast Utilition
( M6tletone Unit 3 Discrepancy Report moview aroup: syWem DnResoLUT alAccePTED
""'** """*"' 'Y""" D"'8" Poesassa opwarmyleous Diedpane: Mechaniost 0"*
O vos Dioeroponey vype: compensed Does g g, systemerocese: HVX NnC signiemence twel: 4 Date faxed to NU:
Date Published: 12/20 7 E- . -ii HEPA Filter Material t -
Dudno review of the component data for the supplementary leak coliedion and release system (SLCRS) and auxiliary building ventilation system (ABVS) filter units a discrepancy regarding the HEPA filter frame matedal was identified.
FSAR Section 6.5.1.6 states that the HEPA fitters are constructed of chromized steel. This does not agree with the vendor manual (OIM-065-0018) that states that the HEPA filter frame matedal is 409 stainless steel, neview veed inveed Needed Date induster: ated, M. D. G O O 12/$le7 vtL.ed: N i. A* ear ^ G O O $ 2**7 VT Mgr: schepier. Den K G O O $2'$ia7 inc counn: Singh, Anand K G O O 12tiser Dese:
ipNALID:
Date: 2/13/96 nasoLUTloN. NU has concluded that Discrepancy Report, DR MP3-0729, has identified a condition not previously discovered by NU which requires corredion. This discrepancy meets the cdteria specified in NRC letter B16901 and.17010 it has been screened per U3 PI-20 cdteria and found to have no operability or reportability concems and meets the Unit 3 deferral criteria CR M3 96-0512 has been written to develop and tracA resolution of this item per RP-4.
Attachments:
CR M3-96-0512 Previeuey seenamed by NU? Q Yes @ No Non r:-- ;"CondaientU Yes @ No
= e P==anet O ve. @ No nadwienunr av.etO va @ No n.wiew inisiseen sted.M.D.
vt Lad: M Anthony A 0 VT Mgn schapler. Den K 0 $va8 inc cienn: singh, Anand K G O maee O O Date: 2/13/96 sL canmmes: Acceptable as CR MS-96-0512 adds DR to binning CR MS 96- ,
0167 for rev6ew of all FSAR related DR's.
Pnnled 2/1sS8 2.33to PM Pope 1 W 1 l
l
Northeast UHildes ICAVP DR No. DR44P34739 umotone urm s Discrepancy Report moview armp: syeesm DR ResoLUT:3N ACCEPTED nwlow teamed: system Design l Dimipam: m % g y, l '": , ~ :, Type: 1.loonsing Documort l systenWpresese: Hvx gg l Nmc signiecense level: 4 Date faxed to NU:
Date Puhitehed: 12Go47 Dlureponey FSAR Table 6.243 Dmoripeten: During review of the supplementary leak collection and release system (SLCRS) exhaust fan ratings a discrepancy in FSAR Table 6.243 was identified.
FSAR Table 6.243 states tha' SLCRS exhaust fans 3HVR*FN12A/B are rated for 9,700 cfm at 22.5 hwg total pressure. Vendor drawin0 2170.430141004E states that the fans are rated at 9,700 acfm at 25.75 iwg static pressure, neview vesd invand Needed Dane inleister: ated, M. D. O O O $2 raser VT Leed: Nort. Anthony A O O O tas47 VT Mgr: schopler, Den K O O O 52/51'87 inc chmn: singh. Anand K l
O O O 52'1**7 Dese:
l PNALS:
Dele: 2/13/96 nEsOLUTioN: NU has concluded that Discrepancy Repod, DR MP3-0739, has identified a condition not p.eviously discovered by NU which requires corredion. This discrepancy meets the criteria specified in NRC letter 816901 and.17010 it has been scroei per US PI-20 criteria and found to have no operability or repor.aoliity concems and meets the Unit 3 deferral criteria. CR M3 96-0512 has been written to develop and track resolution of this item per RP-4.
Attachments: CR M3-96-0512 nn" ;idenoned by Nut U Yu @ No NonDioceepentConmuon?Q vm @ No neeeiumenpenenetO va @ No - urva*edrO v. @ No
- n. view inaletw: stod M. O, """ "" "
VT Lead: Nerl. Anthony A VT Mer: schop8er. Don K inc ch : sin h. Anand K O O Date: 2/13/96 sL commons: Acceptable as CR MS-96-0512 adds DR to binning CR MS 96-0167 for review of all FSAR related DR's.
Prned 2/1ses 2.37:07 PM Page1 or 1 i
Northeast Utilkies ICAVP DR No. DR MP84764 u ltieto n e u n n 3 Discrepancy Report
, Review Greg: system DR RESOLUTION ACCEPTED l Review Element: W Doelp Diesipens: Mechanical Deel"
!t. . -i Type: %% Ow 5, * .7 ! HVX -
g NRC angnineense W 4 Date faxed to Nut Date puhtlehed: 12/2097
. ,i Calculat60n P8V-45AA 1 affected by PDCR MP3 86-074 Descetpmen: Revew of anodification PDCR MP3-86-074 that removed fire dampers SHVR*DMPF4 and 3HVR*DMPF5 from the MCC & Rod Control Area air conditioning system identmed the following
- discrepancy
Calculation PBV.45AA 1 that determines the extemal total pressure loss for 3HVR*ACU1 A % 18 was not revised to reflect
- the removal of the fire dampers.
1 Review vand invahd Needed Date
, inilleters stout. M. D- 0 0 O $ 2**7 vt Lead: N ei. Aa* = v A O O O N7
)
vi Mgra schapter, Den K O IRC Chmn: sergh, Anand K O O 52/1587 O O O intiero7 1
Date:
, IINALB; l Date: 2/9/93 l REa0LUTION: NU has concluded that Discrepancy Report, DR MP3-07u, has
- - klentified a condNion not previously discovered by NU whloh requires conection. This discrepancy meets the ortleria specified in NRC letter B16901 and.17010 it has been screened per US PI-20 criteria and found to have no operability or reportabilNy concems and meets the Unit 3 deferral criteria. CR M3 96-0494 has been written to develop and track resolution of this Nem por
- RP 4.
t Attachments: CR MS 96 0494
=.'r; keenened by Nut U ves @ Its Non D6ee.epent ConamentU v. @ me p%penenetO va @ No Ree*nenuar dro v. @ No Review Acceptable Not P=,
- Needed Date N M M. D.
VT Lead: Nort Anthony A VT Mgr Behspfer, Den K O O O WIC Chmn: Singh, Anand K Date:
SL Commente:
PrWed 2/1o98 2:37;44 PM Page 1 of 1
Northeast Utilities ICAVP DR No. DR#P34758 utilstorm unit s Discrepancy Report
, Review Group: System DR MSOLUTloN ACCSPTWO Newtow Element: MedWloemen Design Desalphne: Mahoniani Dmie O yes l F- . -, Type % % gg l -
sysesswPresses: HVX NRC tegniemenee levet: 4 Date faxed le NU:
Date Puheist.ed: 12noe7
- . re PDCR MP3 92 024 Affected Documents Daerspelen: Durin0 review of PDCR MP3 92 024 that Installs larger diameter wheel in exhaust fans 3HVRTN12A/B the following disotopanoles were identified:
- 1. Calculation P(8) 843 ' Supplementary Look Collection and Release System 'was not revised to reflect the fan performance with the largerdiameter wheel.
- 2. Calculation P(61)-46AF.1 'Extemal Pressure Loss for System 3HVRYN-12A & 128' was not revised to reflect the fan performance with the irrger diameter wheel.
- 3. Spoolf6 cation 2176.4301/1 ' Centrifugal Flow Fans' was not revloed to reflect the fan p< .armance and brake horsepower with the larger diamator whools, moview Vahd invahd Needed Date
=dmosen ved, u. D. O O O $ 2**7 viteed: Nwi, A, iear A G O O tame?
VT Myr Sohopfer, Den K Q Q Q 12/11 7 1RC Clenn: Singh, Anand K
@ Q Q 12/18e7 Dene:
INVALS:
Oste: 2/16/96 mootuttoN: NU has concluded that Disoropency Report, DR MP3-0756, has identifled a condition not previously discovarod by NU whleh requires corTection, This discrepancy meets the critoria specified in NRC letter 816901 and.17010 it has been screened per US PI-20 criteria and found to have no operability or reportability conooms s'wi meets the Unit 3 deferral criteria. CR MS-94-0494 has been writtsn to develop and track resolution of this llem per RP 4.
Attachments: CR M3-98-0494 r... r;lesnuned by Nuf Q Yes @ No Non Descrepent ConmuenTU Yes @ No Re.eeseenpeamaetO v. @ No -un,.*edTO va @ No Review bdusten sted,M.D. '
VT Leed: Nort, Aniheny A VT Men Sohnp8er, Den K inc coin = % AnansK De- mitaine O b O Prtnied 2/1a98 2.38.is PM Page 1 er 2
Northeast Utilities ICAVP DR No. DRW34766 Millstone UnN 3 Discrepancy Report l
l sL m DR rev6ew screening form juWification *1,2 Supplementary Leak l Collectkm & Release System performance demondrated by drew down ted, other . CalculW6on Enhancement' CR M&96-0494 was added to Change Doc bin.
PrHod 2/1698 2.38.19 PM Pop 2 of 2
ICAVP DR No. DR MP3 0778 Northeest Utliities Milletone Unit 3 Discrepancy Report Review Group: system DR RESOLUTION ACCtpTED Review tiement: system Design 06ecipilne: E.nhanmnental ousimoellon O va Diecrepency Type: ceiculat6en (g g syenemTroseus: N/A NRC signiacence level: 4 Oste faxed to NO:
^
Does Putdlehed: t/109e
~
D6*erspency: Equipment Qualification Master Ust (EQMt.) discrepancy D**cripekin: EEQ TRA 105.7 R.w. O, dated May 4,1994 is the Electrical Equipment Test Report Assessment of Raychem Report No.
66722 5 for tne qualification of WCSF $0-N Shim Stock located inside Millstone Unit 0 containment.
The shim stock is used as a si in to build up diameters of small wires to a level within the use o' Raychem's other nuclear grade low voltaGo produds.
The review shows that this item, along with the correspondin0 Test Report Assessment is not included in the EOML However, the EEQ Program Manual, Rev.1 Page 13, Section 4.1.4 states that : 'EQML document includes safety related electric equipment essential to emergency reador shutdown, containment isolation, reactor core cooling, containment snd reactor heat removal, or is otherwise essential in preventing signKicant reles se of radioactive material to the envimnment.'
Review Vebd inveled Needed Date Inittelwi Yeeein, s- 0 0 0 12'11/o7 VTt.eed: Nwt, Anhv ^ Q O O 12/15S7 VT Mort schopler, Don K Q Q Q t2/2347 inc counn: singh. Anand K O O O 12i31/97 Date:
pNAuo:
pe6e: 2/10/96 REsotuTioNt Dispcsition:
NU has concluded that Discrepancy Report, DR MP3-0778, has identified a condition not previously dhcovered by NU which requires corTection. This discrepancy meets the criteria specified in NRC letter B 16901 and,17010. It has been screened per US Pl 20 criteria and found to have no operability or reportability concems and meets the Unit 3 deferral criteria. CR M3 96-0495 has been written to develop and track resolution of this item per RP-4.
Conclusion:
NU has concluded that Discrepancy Report, DR MP3-0778, has identified a condition not previously discovered by NU which requires cctrection, This discrepancy meets the criteria spec! fled in NRC le'.ter B 16901 and,17010. It has been screened per U3 PI 20 criteria and found to have no operability or reportability concems and meets the Unit 3 deferral criteria. CR M3-96-0495 has been written to develop and track resolution of this item per RP 4.
sisevieueay m oun.a i,y u n r1v ce) m - rum.p.ne ca~a wc 1 vu (e) un
_ Printed 2/16/96138.52 PM Page1 or 2
4 ICAVP on k ones4ns
- Northeast Utilitnee Millstone Unit a Discrepancy Report l 4 :
_ ._ _n ,
n=*m a >=*c0 v. @ w. n *m u v to v.s @ u.
4 NOVISW
% Yemein,8,
- WW" M Dde O O O ?/im ,
VT Land: Herl, Anthony A 0 O O mm vrm e n % ,oenx mm inc enm.: s m ar.,w x 0 D D O O O ame:
SL Commente:
l i
k 4
.)
s 4
.t b
+
b 4
PrHed 2/1M18 2-38:56 PM %2W 2 o
, - - - ,,r. - - - , . _ , - - - - . , , + - . --....-~.n-..-..--,-- .-:-,,_,,-a-. - --,--.,.--.,c- . , - - - , , .---.n -,e --
-.e--
t SCAVP- DR N' DRW84781 Northeast Utst6es
- Mmetone Unit 3 - Discrepancy Report 1
i' RevlowGroup: system DR Res0LUTtoN aoCePTED i
Review seement: system osse pesospone: tassertoet Design p) y,,
! Olsersponey Type: Colodegen ,
@ No i ' s, L . ^ N/A NRo sioniemenselevel: 4 Date FAlted to ND:
DatePuhilshed: 1/1090
.. Cable lengths used assums one way volta 0s drop (Calculation 122E).
Desatpasn: 't his calculation slaes the PT leads between the switchgear lineups and the main coMrol board.
i The analytical model used to determine voltage drop lists the distences to the Main Control Board (MCS) from the 6.9,4.16 and .480 Volt awltch0 ear l6neups without stating whether the .
distance is a cable length of a circuit length ( they appear to be cable lengths). The coloulat60n should use the oitout length in t calculating the total volta 0e drop. Also, no reference is provided .
as to the basis for the cable lengths. A single distance is J
provided for the cable length from each of the switchgear lineups '
to the MCB without any justification that the length listed is the lon0est.
No reference is provided that states why a 2 volt drop is
!- soceptable, Calculation 122E supersedes Calculation 44E. However, under
- 7 Objective
- R states
- to check Calculation No. 44E
- and under
- 3 i
Assumptions
- R states
- See Calc. No. 44E.* If Calculation 122E does supersede Calculation 44E N should be stated within the objective and the assumptions should be repeated in Coloulation 122E.
Review
' -vand invand Needed Date g: O. 12/1247 Inteletert Crookset.Ed. @ 12/1**7 vt Leed: Nat, Anmeny A o- 0 0 l i
vi m en schopfw, Den K Q _. Q 12/2347 sec caenn: sire. Anand K g =
0 52'8187
. Date: ;
eNaLB: ,
. Date: 2/13/98 Resolute NU has concluded that item 3 of Discrepancy Report DR MP3-
- 0791, has identified a condit6on not previously discovered by NU which requires correction. Condition Report (CR) MS-6aL0371 >
1 was written to provide the necessary corrective actions to revise calculation 122E to comply with the Design Control Manual DCM. The approved Corrective Action Plan (CAP) for MS 96- i
- 0371 is attached. The hem is scheduled for completion post l
startup. NU considers this item to be sientftcance level 4
- because the dosion basis is not impacted. Today the procedure for doing the calculation would use the Desi0n Control Manual j
DCM chapter 5. Attachment 1 is the approved calculat6on format Psee 1 or 2 l c Preses arisestaas en 2
Nonheast Utluteos ICAVP DR No. Dws4791 Misistorm unit 3 Discrepancy Report that is in use today.
NU has cono6uded that hem 1 and 2 leeues reported in Disotopenoy Report, DR44PS-0791, do not represent d6screpent condh60ns, in coloulat6on 122E the circuit lon0th is equal lo the cable length because this is e 3 phase circut.
The unooria6nty in the PT coloulation is ortt6 cal for the dooreded grid vota0e relays of the 4.16 KV system. This is addroceed in calculat6on NL 042. The uncertainty calculat6on la conservative because the relay will trip before the analytical limit is reached annoe rk, vokape drop is assumed. The 2 volt drop was used in calculation 122E as an estimated soceptance value of vota0e drop Detween 4w switch 0 ear and the MCB for omb6e enzing pusposes and does not effoot the instrument uncertainty.
830nifloanos Level ortleria do not apply here as this is not a disorspent condition.
Concluelon: NU has concluded that hem 3 of Disorspency Report, DR-MP3-0791, has identified a condition not previously i discovered by NU which requires correction. Condh60n Report (CR) MS 06 0371 was written to provide the noosseery corrective to revies coloulation 122E to comply with the Design Control Manuel DCM. The hem is scheduled for completion poet startup.
NU considers this hem to be sien6ficanoe level 4.
NU has concluded that hem 1 and 2 leeues reported in Disotopency Report, DR MP3 0791, do not represent discrepent condknons. In coloulellon 122E the otroult length is equal to the cable length becaus ( s is a 3 phone oitout. The 2 volt drop was used in coloulation 122E as an estimated anceptance value of vohage drop between the switchgear and the MCB for cable enzing purposes and does not effed the instrumord uncertainty.
Sionif6canos Level ortlerle do not apply here as this is not a dieorcrent condn6on.
Premumyw=mederuur U v. e n. m.on ,.nic.ame eU y= ce; m n hm p.amaerO va @m n *e.u *.dtO v @ m.
n.*.
Inle ter: Croctes. Ed.
vt L d: N.rt, Arthony A VT leert soh.pf.r, D.n K
" - ~ ~ -
B O.6.:
el o.n.n.ses:
n O
Northeast Utilities BCAVP DR No. DRMM Minetone unit : Discrepancy Report novtow Group: apelem Dn MacumoN AoosPfeO nwtow thment: syesom Desip Dissipe=: undenissi ossip O vos Disersponey Type: Componord oste gg systenveressee: Hvx Isto algniseense twee: 4 Date fared to NU:
DatePuhtshed: 1/1740
-r . -W Valve 3HVR*V219 Classification Daartruen: During review of the componord data for valve 3HVR*V219 a discrepancy regarding the nefety classification of the valve in the Plerd Design Data System (PDOS) database was identified.
The valve is located in a Class 3 line (3 HVR 760 40 3 and S.
HVR 7 io 20 3) as shown on P&lD EM 148E.
The PDDS valve description number is VOS000 W 3 fumished under apoc6fication 2282.160164. This is a ASME Section lil, Class 3 valve por the spoolfication.
The PDOS QA Cal *0ery for this valve is QA Cat 2. This does not '
agree with the valve speelfication, the PMM8 database, or the classifloation required based on the clasalfication of the line it is installed in, newtow Vend twebd Needed Date Inluder: Sted,M.o, Q O O 12r*A7 VT Laod: Nort, Arenny A G O O 12n**7 viusr: nes,an, oen x G O O. 12 m f wie on== sinsh, An.s x B O O Sn
- Date:
DNALB:
Does: 2/9/98 nee 0LLrfloN: NU has conduded that Discrepancy Report, DR MP3-0796, has identified a condMion not previously discovered by NU whloh
~ requirts corredion. This discrepancy moota the ortoria specified in NRC letter 816901 and.17010 it has been screened por US Pl.
20 orMorta and found to have no operability or reportability 7
concame and moots the Unit 3 deferral ortoria. CR M3-96-0495 has been written to develop and track resolution of this item per RP 4.'
Attachments:
CR MS 9s-049s Prwoonee r idenMhed by Nut Q vos @ No NonOloceepentCondulen?Q vos @ No
- penenetO va @m asaass=un,.e edro va @m nom.
Innister: Sted.M.o, vt Lese: Nort, Armany A B D D 2n
- O O 2n *
. vt men see,an, oen x _0 WIC olenn: Sergh, Anand K ernes anwess.eu eu emp t er a
Northeast Uumes ICAVP M
- M*45 uisistorm Unit 3 Discrepancy Report O O O Deto:
SL Comments:
Prned 2/1W96 2 40:07 PM Page 2 of 2
--__---2--_--.-_ l
Northeast Utilities ICAVP DR No. DR 4AP34794 Millstone Unit 3 Discrepancy Report Review Group: systwn DR MEsOLUTION ACCaPTED Rev6ew Elmame: symm Desieri Diecipane: l'twtronmnerW ouethoshan O va 06ecrepency Type: Component Date aya6ewProcese: HVX gg a.s.W sientaeonce level: 4 Date FAned to NU:
Date Putdlehed: 1/17/9s Discrepency: Missing Class 1E Equipment Data Shoots in Spe ification 2472.610426 D*metposun: The review of the Precemord Specification No. 2472.510426 (ASCO Pressure / Tori rerature switches . Cat. l) shows that the Equipment Data Sheets of the followin0 Class 1E components are missing:3HVR*PS209A,813HVR*TS172A.B ;
3HVR'TS175A1, A2, B1, B2,3HVR*T8176A,8 ;
3HVR*TS177A,8 However, the Millstone Equipment Qualification Master Ust (EQML) shows these equipment as Class 1E components located in harsh environment in the Auxiliary Building in Zones AB-04, AB 26, and AB 39.
Review veed inveed Nooded Date inlinater: Yeeein, s. O O Q 12/1897 vT L.ed: N"'. ^a"=v ^ O O O 12/1**7 VT Hgrs &ehopfer, Den K O O O $2/2397 1RC Chmn: sirgih. Anand K O O- -O 1'15's Date:
ilWallD:
D*: 2/10/96 nEsolutioN: Disposition:
NU has concluded that Discrepancy Report, DR MP3-0798, has identified a condition not previously discovered by NU which requires conedion. This discrepancy meets the criteria specified in NRC letter 816901 and,17 10. It has been screened per US PI 20 criteria and found to he.no operability concems and meets the Unit 3 doferral criteria. CR MS 96-0491 has been written to develop and track resolution of this Hem per RP 4.
Conclusion:
NU has concluded that Discropancy Report, DR MP3-0798, har identified a condition not previously discovered by NU which requires correction. This discrepancy meets the criteria specified in NRC letter B 16901 and,17010. It has been screened per U3 PI 20 criteria and found to have no operability concems and meets the Unit 3 deferral crtierta. CR M3-0491 has been written to develop and track resolution of this item per RP 4.
Previove'y idenelaed by Nu? O vos @ No Non Diecrepent Conda6on?Q vos @ No n.ewinenrenenetO va @ No - unteedvedt O vos @ No moview Acceptable Not V / peneded Date
%; y g, VTLand: Nort. Anthony A b Prtreed 2/1696 2.40 44 PM Pete 1 or 2
ICAVP M h M*84N Northeast utsties Millstone Unit 3 Discrepancy Report O atim VT My Scheper.DenK , yg g ne ce : sw. An w x D D one:
SLconenente!
= ._ _
PrWed 2/1m 2447 PM Page 7 of 2
ICAVP DR N3. DR MP3 0799 Nonhott Utilities Millstone Unit 3 Discrepancy Report Rev6ew Group: sysio DR RESOLUTION ACCEPTED Review tiemont: System Design g Dieciphne: Erwironmnental Queimcat" O Y.
Diecrepency Type: Component Date gg SystemProcess: HVX NRC signMicance levet 4 Date faxed to NU:
Date Putdiohed.1/10S6 Diecrepency: Environmental Parameters Discrepancy in Specification 2170.430 140 De*cri= tion: The procurement Specification No. 2170.430140 for the Axial Flow Fans of Buffalo Forge Co. does not list the expected environmental parameters for the environmental equipment qualification (EQ) Zones associated with the follovMnD safety-related Class 1E Westin0 house fan motors :
3HVRTN13A,B ; 3HVRTN10A,3 ; SHVRTN6A,8 ;
3HVRTN14A,B Millstone UnN 3 FSAR Section 3.11B.2.2 requires that all Olass 1E equipment spedfications define at least the worst case envelope service conditions anticipated for Class 1E electrical equipment.
The review of the EQ Test Report No. DO-148F (Reference No.
HVX A,2-0011) confirms that the above mentioned fan motors are environmentally qualified to the boundin0 envimnmental parameters at the existin0 motor locations in the auxiliary buildin0 of the plant in Zone AB-04.
Review Valid InveNd Needed Date inloor: Yeeein. S. O O O 12iiss7 VT Leed: Nat, Anthony A O O O 12ises7 VT Mgr: Schopfer, Don K Q O O 12/23s7 IRC Chmn: singh. Anand K O O O i2 ratio 7 Dese:
IwAuD:
Dece: 2/10/96 ResoLUT m: Disposition:
NU has concluded that Discrepancy Report, DR-MP3-0799, has identified a condition not previously discovered by NU which requires correction. This discrepancy meets the criterH 4pecified In NRC letter B 16910 and 17010. It has been screened per U3 PI-20 criteria and found to have no operability or reportability concems and meets the Unit 3 deferral criteria. CR M3-98-0493 has been written to develop and track resolution of this item per RP-4.
Conclusion:
NU has concluded that Discrepancy Report, DR-MP3-0799, has identified a condition not previously discovered by NU which requires correction. This ciereDancy meets the criteria specif'ad .
in NRC letter B 16910 and 17010. It has been screened per U3 PI 20 criteria and found to have no operability or reportability concems and meets the Unit 3 deferral criteria. CR M3-98-0493 has been written to develop and track resolution of this item per PrM2/16/9e 2'41:15 PM PeGe 1 or 2
ICAVP DR No. DR MP3-0799 Northeast Utiinies Millstone unu 3 Discrepancy Report RP-4, Previously wenamed by nut 'O Yu @ No hnmacropontConmuon?U Yes @ No neechahnPenmaetO vee @ ue messiemenunroom estO va @ ue Review i
' ~ '
inellater: Yeeein, 8.
VT Leed: Neri, Anthony A b VT Mgr: Schopfer, Don K IRC Chmn: Singh, Anand K Dele:
SL Commente:
Printed 2/16/96 2:41:19 PM Page 2 of 2
ICAVP DR No. DRW348M '
Northeast utsties uinstone unit 3 Discrepancy Report newtowee up: syenom on mEaOLUTION AcCaFTED noview timment: syneem Desten oi=ir ne:
m En*-aa as ouwa==>n o y, Dieneepeney Type: cenpenet Date g g, s) h HYX ssec angniacense twee:4 Dane Faxed toNu:
Date Pumashed.1/1046 oneseopency: Equipment Location Discrepancy in Specification 2176.430448 o=evipet n: In the Procurement Specification No 2176.430448 the Data Shoot of the Westinghouse Class 1E motors of the Air Handling Units 3HVR*ACU1A,B specifies the location of the motors as the Control Buildino -Control Room.
However, according to the Millstone Equipment Qualification Master List (EQML) the locath : of the same motors is listed as the Auxiliary Buildin0 in EQ Ib e AB 21 at Elevation 66ft4ln in the MCC A/C Room.
Also, the review of the FSAR Page No. 38127 confirms that the existing location of the motors is Zone AB 21 in the Auxiliary Buildin0 noview Vand I. mud Needed Osse inmiseen Yeeein.S. O O O 12itse7. ,
VT Lead: Neri, arm A 3 O O taries7 meen schapin,oenK 3 O O 12r23s7 sec chen: sergh, Anand K Q- 0 O 12tsis7 case:
INVAUD:
oste: 2/10/98 nEsOLUTION: Dispcaition:
NU has concluded that Discrepancy Report, DR-MP3-0800, has identified a condition not previously discovered by NU which requires corredion. This discrepancy meets the criteria specified in NRC letter B 16910 and 17010. It has been screened per US ,
PI-20 criteria and found to have no operebiitty or reportability concems and meets the Unit 3 deferral criteria. CR MS-98-0513 has beer, written to develop and track resolution of this item per RP-4.
Conclusion:
NU has concluded that Discrepancy Report, DR-MP3-0800, has identified a condition not previously discovered by NU which requires correceon. This discrepancy meets the criteria specified in NRC letter B 16910 and 17010. It has been screened per U3 PI-20 criteria and found to have no operability or reportability concems and meets the Unit 3 deferral criteria. CR M3-98-0513 has been written to develop and track resolution of this item per RP-4.
Previously idonesAed by NU7 U Yes @ No Non oloceepent CondNion?U Yes (9)~No~
perenenetO v= @ Ne reunr=wvedtO v. @ No
- n. view m.
mm. ""*f'* h Not ^~af'8=8'a= Needed Done
'~
Printed 2/16/98 2 41:44 PM PeGe 1 or 2
BCAVP DR No. DR MP3 0400 Northeast utilities Milistone unM 3 . Discrepancy Report V""'
YT My: M. Don K
^
$ 0 0 zS g g y, me cienn: sm An.ns n 0- O Date:
SL comments:
Printed 2/1&96 2-41:48 PM PaGe 2 of 2
ICAVP M No. MMP361 Northeast Utilities Milletone Unit 3 Discrepancy Report Review Group: system DR RESOLUTION ACCEPTED Review Element: system Design l
"'"**"*"""'"'"'"** O va Diecrepency Type: NW gg syste WPreeses: HVX NRC signoscence M: 4 Date faxed to NU:
Date Putdiohed: t/1046 r+ ~ T y: Supply and Retum Air Registar Pressure Drop Data E= w n During review of the duct pressure drop calculations a discrepancy regarding the pressure drop values used for the supply and retum air registers was identified.
The following calculations do not provide a reference or source for the supply and retum air register pressure drops used in the calculation:
PBV 45AA 1 Extemal Total Pressure Loss for 3HVR'ACU1 A &
1B PSV-45AF 1 Extemal Pressure Loss for System 3HVRTN-12A
& 12B PBV-45AG 1 Total Pressure Loss for Fan 3HVRTN13A & B PBV-45AH 1 Total Pressure Loss for Fan 3HVRTN14A & 14B Review vaad invead Neeeed Date ini . er: Stout, M. D. O O O isties7 O O $2iiss7 VT Lead: Nort, Anthony A G VT Mgr: SchopW. Don K G O O 12r2sS7 IRC Chmn: Singh, Anand K G O O 12rstis7 Date:
INVAUD: ,
Date: 2/9/98 .
RESOLUTION: NU has concluded that Discrepancy Report DR MP3-0801, has identified a condition not previously discovered by NU which requires correction. This discrepancy meets the criteria specified in NRC letter B18901 and.17010 it has been screened per U3 PI-20 criteria and found to have no operability or reportability concems and meets the Unit 3 deferral criteria. CR M3-98-0515 has been written to develop and track resolution of this item per RP-4.
Attachments:
CR M3-98-0515 Previously identised by NU? O Yes @ No Non Er:-M Condalon?Q Yes @ No R. iwionrendinotO Yes @ No Reeosue 4unresoived?O va @ No Review initiator: Stout, M. D. ;
VT Leed: Nort, Anthony A VT Mgr: Schopfer, Don K IkC Chmn: Sin 0h, Anand K Dele:
Printed 2r16/96 2 42:16 PM Pegs 1 or 2
- - _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ l
ICAVP M No. MMW1 Northeast Utilkies Milletone Unk 3 Discrepancy Report SL Cormisses:
B Page 2 of 2 Ptinted 2/16418 24220 PM
. _ l
l DR No DR MP34837 -
Northeast Utilities ICAVP Milistone Unit 3 Discrepancy Report Revtow Groep: Operchens & Maintenance and Tesang . OR RESOLUTION ACCEPTED Revtow Elemesd: coneohe Acmen Procese
"*": '*""' O va ,
06 ceepencyTyPe:conocew Aasen , g, s, _m. : Hvx -
NRc Signiacencelevel: 4 Date faxed to NU:
DatePubmehed: 1/1046 D6ece.p esy: Prowdures were not revised in accordance to commitments.
Descripaen: Commitments were made in Licensee Event Reports (LER) to make changes to administrative procedures. These procedures were to provide information to the Operaters regarding P lanned openings into equipment, pipes, or strudural bounderles.
LER 95-004-00 was written because evaluations have determined that historical breaches did not result in loss of safety function of the Control Room pressure boundary, but did involve sioncompliance with Technical Specifications. The actions to prevent recurrence willinclude procedure chan0es and Technical Specification changes to restore operational flexibility.
Commitment Records 12711,17775 and CR M3-97-1394 were written to track the completion of the corrective actions.
Special procedure SPROC 95-313, Cable Pull & Seal Installation in Electrical Penetration Openings in Secondary Containment and Control Room Pressure Boundaries, was developed to prevent compromising the:;e pressure boundaries through penetrations seals. This procedure was replaced by PT 31470.
S&L reviewed PT 31470. The Secondary Containment Buundaries are outside the scope of this procedure.
Procedure U3 WC 14, On-line Scheduling, was to be revised to include a review of affected Technical Specifications with special attention paid to surveillance acceptance criteria. Prior to revision of WC 14 the commitment was revised. The revision deleted the requirement to review the surveillance of the acceptance criteria in a procedure. This requirement was judged by NU to not be practical r,or would it have prevented the event.
S&L has reviewed U3 WC 14. The procedure with Attachments loclude provisions for schedulin0 considerations and lists systems requiring a PRA review. These do not inclu6 references to Supplemental Leak Collection and Release System or Secondary Boundaries. The procedure does not reference any commitments in Section 3 of the procedure.
Tree proced: ires do not address the commitments made and are considered to be a descrepancy.
Review Vehd InveEd Needed Date O O i2iias7
' initiator: Pleniewicz. R. G $2/iss7 VT Leed: asas, Men G O O O i2r2357 VT Mgr: Schopfer, Don K G O PeGe 1 or 2 Printed 2/16462:42;t/2 PM 1
l ICAVP DR No. DR MP3-0637
- Northeost utilMies Ministone unM 3 Discrepancy Report sec chmn: sWgh, Anand K O O O 52rsis7 Dene:
swAuD:
Date: 2/13/96-MEsoLimoN. NU has corcluded the Discrepancy Report, DR MP3-0637, has identifica a condition ,4 veviously discovered by NU which requires correction. This u screpancy meets the criteria specified in NRC letter B16901 and.17010 it has been screened per U3 PI-20 critoria and found to have no operability or reportability conooms and meets the Unit 3 deferral criteria. CR MS-96-0652 has been written to develop and track resolution of this item per RP-4,
Conclusion:
NU has concluded that Discrepancy Report, DR MP3-0337, has identified a condition not previously discovered by NU which requires correction. This discrepancy meets the criterla specified in NRC letter B16901 and.17010 it has been screened per U3 PI-20 criteria and found to have no operability or reportability concoms and meets the UnM 3 deferral criteria. CR M3-98-0652 has been written to develop and track resolution of 11% ltem per RP-4. -
Previousey heenunos by Nut U Yu (G) No teen Descreped Conmuon?U .Yu (9) No
=% %tO v. @ N. mu==madrO vm @ No n.wiew
- ^ Not " - . Needed Date R.
O O O 2nm vit.eed: Bees, Ken vim ne soh.eier,oen K O O O =
5tc Chmn: sinwh. Anand K Date:
aL comments:
Printed 2dSDS 2-42 56 PM Page 2 or 2
M No. M MP34841' Northe:st UGHues ICAVP Millstone Unit 3 - Discrepancy Report Revlow ereup: System OnnESOLaJTioN ACCEPTED M sevet.w$ O gg Deserspency Type: Cetouteten
- 8, _^ m HVX
- NnC Signiseenselevel: 4 Date FAXad to NU: -
Date Puhnetw4: 1/17/98 Dieseepancy: Dud Support Calculation Disgsperci Desertption: We have reviewed the Duct Support Calculatior.s no. NP(T)-
25450-501,Rev.2 and NP(F)-Z5450 502,Rev.0.
Based '90n this review,we have noted the following discrepancy:
Steel momeber an0le sections have been qualified by insportion ,
only without providing any additional technical justification.
For examples,see qualification of L 31/2 x 21/2 x 1/4,3'-6* long (Pa0e no. 6 of Ref. calc.no, NP(T) Z545D-501,Rev.2) and L 21/2 x 11/2 x 1/4,3'-
9'long (Pape no. 3 of Ref. calc. no. NP(F)-Z5450 502,Rev.0),
newesw Vaud invalid Needed laste Inittster: IQelc, N y Q 'Q_ 12/1847-12/1ae7 VT Leed: Nerl, Ardheny A O 12/2347 VT Mgr: Schapdor, Den K O O O-1/134s IncClenn: Sergh, AnandK Q Q Oste:
INVALD:
Date: 2/10/96 REsoLufloN NU has concluded that Discrepancy Report, DR MP3 0841, has identified a condNion not previously discovered by NU which requires conection. This discrepency meets the criteria specified
. In NRC letter 816901 and.17010 it has been screened per US Pl.
20 criteria and fou:1d to have no operability or reportability concems and meets the Unit 3 deferral criteria. CR MS 96-0515 has been written to devolep and track resolution of this item per RP-4.
, heenuned by Nu? . U Yu (4)too NonDescrepentConduton?U Yes @ No 7../
-a% un,=w=dtO va @ No
~%P-sane 70 v. @ N.
n.wiew
^
Not .' ,
Needed Date VT Leed: Nerl. Anthony A VT Mgr: Schapler DenK stC Clenn: Singh, Anand K Date:
sL Conenente:
> Pepe1 or 1 Pdneed 2/16/962 43:25 PM
Northeast Utilities- lCAVP . DR No. DMP369 Misistone Unit 3 Discrepancy Report t
neview aroup: system DR nasoumON ACCEPTED l
noview moment: system Damien ,,,,,,,,
Descapane: Mooherdeel Desi'"
Deseropency Type: Drostry O ves
@ No sHJ :HVX Nnc signeteanse imi: 4 Date FAXad to NU:
Date Pubhohed: 1/1048 Discrepancy: Auxiliary Building Duct Support Mark Number Drawing
Description:
During review of the auxiliary buildin0 ventilation system and the supplemordary leak collection and release system ductwork
- drawin0s the following discrepancy was identified.
Note 5 on drawin0 EB-45G 9 states "for duct support mark i numbers for el 66'-6" see EB-450,R". Review of GRITS indicates that the drawings referred to in the note are void. ,
noview VelW InveEd Needed Date initiator: Stout. M. D. O O O 12/twe7 VT Leed: Nerl, Anthony A O O O 12/1sST VT Mer Schopfer, Den K 2 O O 12/2347 weC caoun: saneh, Mand K O O O 52/857 Date:
INVALB:
Date: 2/16/98 nESOLUTioN. NU has concluded that Diu:repancy Repod, DR MP3-0649, has identified a condition not previously discovered by NU which requires correction. This discrepancy meets the criteria specified in NRC letter B16901 and 17010. It has been screened per US PI-20 criteria and found to have no operab"ity or reportability concems and meets the Unit 3 deferral critera. CR M3-98-0514 has been written to develop and track resolution of this item per RP-4.
Attachments:
CR M3-96-0514 M. :_:!;identined by NU? O Yee (9) No Non Discrepent Condition?U Yee @) No n oiemenrenenetO va @m m unt.e
- eet O vos @ No n.wiew initialer: Stout. M. D.
VT Lead: Nerl. Anthony A VT Mar: Schopfer, Don K Inc Chmn: Singh, Anand K Date: 2/16/98 st Commente: CR M3-98-0514 is in the Drawing " bin" and DR Review Screen deferral justification is noted as "Non Operations Critical D%epancies - Enhancement".
Pnnled 2/1696 2455 PM PeGe 1 or 1
DR No. DR MP3 0449 WhN Utnuks BCAVP Miiistone unn 3 Discrepancy Report Review Group: Opershone & MeNonance and Toseng DR RESOLUTION ACCEPTED Revlow Element: change Procese rua,4pa%e: Meireenance O vee
'" -- ; :p Type: Component Dale gg s, _ . r - swP NRC Signiacm leveh 4 Date faxed to NU:
Date Puhilohed: 1/18/96 Dimepeacy: PMMS records not changed to refled correct valve manufacturst or part numbers.
Deecetption. Production Maintenance Mana0ement System (PMMS) nponert identification (ID) Information for 3SWP-V840 and 3SWP V841 was not changed to refied Powell as the
- vwnponent manufadurer after the valves were interchanged s en0 installation of PDCR 3-02-010. The current PMMS 'D identifies JENKINS as the valve manufacturer contrary to the modification documentation. The PMMS-Bill of Material (BOM) for these two valves has not been revised to refied the changed 4 valves.
3 No documentEtion was provided that would verify the manufadurer, model, or part numbers of the ten valves that were up0raded or changed as part of PDCR 3-92-010.
The objective of the upgrade described in this PDCR was to extond the seismic and safety class boundary of the Post Act.ident Sampling System (PASS) service water supply.
Review veild . Inwoud Needed Date .
inaisser: spear, R. 9 O O 12/22/87 VT Leed: asse, xaa G O O 12c -
VT Mer: schopfer, Don K G O O 1/12io6 unc chmn: Singh, Anand K S O O 1'15/S8 Date:
DNAUD:
Dese: 2/13/98 RESOLUT1oN. Disposition:
NU has concluded that Discrepancy Report, DR-MP3-0889, has identified a condition not previously discovered by NU which requires corredion. This discrepancy meets the criteria specified in NRC letter B16901 and.1701011 has been screened per U3 PI-20 criteria and found to have no operability or reportability concems and meets the Unit 3 deferral criteria. CR M3-98-0655 has been written to develop and track resolution of this item per RP-4.
i
Conclusion:
NU has concluded that Discrepancy Report, DR-MP3-0889, has identified a condition not previously discovered by NU which requires correction. This discrepancy meets the criteria specified in NRC letter B18901 and.17010 it has been screened per U3 PI-20 criteria and found to have no operability or reportability Printed 2/16/96 2:44:31 PM Page1 or 2 l
ICAVP DR No. DM4P3-0449 NortheOst Utstles Millstone Unit 3 Disecapancy Report concems and meets the UnN 3 deferral crMeria, CR M3-96-M55 has been written to develop and track resolution of this Nem per RP 4, Previoussy monened by wt U ves f@ m mapiecmpantConmuon?U Yes (e.) No n none.nanetO v @= % = * .d7 0 v @ No n
Inmieter Speer, R. **
VY Lead: Bee., Men G O O VT Mgr: Schopeer, Don K Inc Clenn: Singh, Anand K Date:
SL Connante:
l
-n wom, east uow- ICAVP DR No. M MP349M Ministond bra Discrepancy Report Revtour Gretp: Operatione & Maintenance and Teeung DR HEsOLUTioN ACCEPTt"'
ReAsw Element: Test Pmeedwo
- '" O va F
.- :y Type: Pmoedure L.m._
systemerseens: Dox g .
NRC signiacanos level: 4 Date faxed to NU:
Does Pulmahed: siiame r . i. Record retention for a Technical Specification test procedure not maintained.
Descri nen: A review of the diesel fuel oil delivery sample programs reveals P
the following:
- 1) The Kinematic Viscosity Worksheet (Chem Form 807/2807/3807AAL-6) used in accordance with procedure CP
' 807/2807/3807AAL to (:ollect data and calculate the kinematlC viscosity to satisfy Technical Specification 4.8.1.1.2.e.1.b is discarded and only the resuN is transferred to the Diesel Fuel l Sample Verification Checklist. This worksheet should be retained as part of the station's permanent records since it
'onfirms performance of a Technical Specification test requirement.
Review wees Inveed Needed Date initiater: Temeyn. Tom VT Lead: asse, Ken O O 'O 12/2eer
, 9 O O 12/sme7 B
VT u er: schoofer, Don K D 0 ti 2/se -
IRC Chmn: singh, Anand K G O- 0 1'is/se Date:
i INVALS:
Dese: .2/13/98 REsOLUTloN: NU has concluded that Discrepancy Report, DR-MP3-0919, has identified a condition not previously discovered by NU which requires correction. This discrepancy meets the criteria specified in NRC letter B16901 and.17010 it has been screened per U3 PI-20 crt:eria and found to have no operability or repottability concems and meets the Uni'. 3 deferral criteria. CR M3-98-0656 -
I has even written to develop and track resolution of this item per RP-4.
Conclusinn:
NU has concluded that Discrepancy Report, DR-MP3-0919, has identified a condition not previously discovered by NU which
- requires correction. This discrepancy meets the criteria specified in NRC letter B16901 and.17010 it has been screened per U3 PI-20 criteria and found to have no operability or reportability 4
concems and meets the Unit 3 deferral criteria. CR M3-98-0656 -
has been written to develop and track resolution of this item per RP-4.
i Previously iden#And by NU? Q Yes @ No Non D6ecrepent Condition?Q Yes @ No p% Penene70 $= @ No naosunonunram?O va @ No Printed 2/16/se 2 46 ce PM Page 1 or 2
Northeast Utimies ICAVP DR No. DR-MP34919 Mill *t a Ur* 3 Discrepancy Report Indbleter: Qeer, R. O'**
VTLand: asse, Men O O O 2n m vi ur. sch ,*r, o n K O O O 2n m aflC Chan: Singh, Anand K Dele: #
SL Conynents:
}
Printed 2/1W 2:4:12 PM
%2W 2 l
Northeast Utsties ICAVP DR h M.MP34125 Mastorm unit 3 Discrepancy Report Revtow Group: CenAguremen DR RESOLUTloN REJECTED PotendelOpersbety Issue Discipene:14 C Deelen Dieneepeney Type: insieseman irnpiernernest,n Ow g ,.
syse* swP W Weniteense twel: 4 Date faxed to NU:
DatePuhnehed. 12/14/97
'DisorePancy: Labelin0 not in accordance with requirements Descripelen: The following labeling inadequacies with respect to design ,
documents and requirements of Procedure OA-9, Rev. 2, "Syftem and Component Labeling," were noted during system
-- walkdowns.
Kamen vendor drawing 2474.030424-193 Rev. F designates the following identMies for components included in panels 3RM3%AK1 A and 3RMS*RAK18:
Recorder (REC 7) to be identified as SSWP*RR60A Recorder (REC 7 & 8) to be identif6ed SSWP*RR608 4 Conirary to these requirements, these recorders are currently labeled as RIC 7A and RlC 78 & 8B.
newesw vand invand Needed Date -
buitialer: Server, T. L a 0 -it 2el97 VT Lead: Nort, Ardhanr A ; CO O O tirain/97 VT higr: Schapter Den K B O O 12'57 inc Chnum: singh, Anand K g $2/8/97 Date:
INVAUD:
Date: 2/13/96 s REsoLUTloN: Desposition:
NU has concluded that Descrepency Report, DR-MP3-0225, has identified a condNion not previously discovered by NU which requires correction. This discrepancy meets the criteria specified in NRC letter B16901 and 17010. It has been screened per US PI-20 crheria and found to have no operability or reportability concems and meets the UnN 3 deferral criteria. CR M3-96-0137 has been written to develop and track resolution of this item per RP-4.
Conclusion:
NU has concluded that Discrepency Report, DR-MP3-0225, has identified a condition not previously discovered by NU which requires correction. This discrepancy meets the crMeria specified in NRC letter B16901 and 17010. It has been screened per U3 PI-20 criterta and found to have no operability or reportability concems and meets the Unit 3 deferral criteria. CR MS-96-0137 Prtnted 2fie/98 2.471D4 PM Pagei or 2 1
1
ICAVP M No. MW34225 Northeast Utilities
[ Millstone unit 3 Discrepancy Report .
[.
has been wattwo to develop and track resolution of this item per -
RP-4, W;identinedinf nut Q vos @ No Non[MCondellon?U Yes @ No P"% P.ndhg?O vs. @ N. Messimonun, ev.4?O v= @ No Review inteleter: Womer l.
VT Lead: Neri, Archeny A vT Mor: scheper. Don K inc chen: singh, Anand K O O Date: 2/13/98 atcommente: Plant screening criteria states:
Plant labeling discrepancies which have a direct im,ract on plant configuration operation or personel safety. Other labeling discrepancies (e.g. use of dashes instead of asterisks in labels) may be deferred, This lat:eling discrepancy does not appt 3 eW the Unit 3 deferral criteria, r
e e
).:
DR No. DR-MP3G224 -
Northeast UtNuies ICAVP
, Ministorm unit 3 Discrepancy Report Revtow Group: Cordguremen DR AEsOLUTION MEJECTRO neview tamment: syssarnInstehamn osocipane:Ia c Dawn O v.
Olocrepancy Type: Instatsuon .. .-i
^
g s,r -- sWP NRC signiscence level: 4 - Date faxed to NU:
Date Puhtlehod. 12/14/97 osecre,uncy: Instrument Mounting Decetpeton: Instrura antation mounting details are provided in vendor manuals and design drawings. The following discrepancies between design documents and the installation were noted during the system walkdown.
- 1. Rosemount Vendor Manual 656 0028 require that instruments w641 be mounted level. Flow transmitter SSWP-FT-500 is not installed level. Excessively out of level conditions may impact the accuracy of the flow transmitter causing mal-functions given the small pressure involved - this device measures differential pressures in the range of inches of water.
The difference in the elevation of the ports of th's device resulting from the out of-level condition could affect the ability of the instrument to accurately measure the pressure differential and, therefore, the flow in the pipe.
- 2. Helicoid /Ashcroft Vendor Manual 01M-226-002A rsquires that flush or v.all-mounted gauges are to be installed by means of screws. Pressure Indicators SSWP Pl139A&B,140 A&B,141 -
A&B and 142 A&B are all mounted with only one of the three required mounting bolts / screws.
- 3. Mounting and cormsion/ oxidation control requirements are set forth in Barton Manuals 01M-377 5A,01M-377.001B,01M-377.006A and Nu specificetions SP-EE-212-D-3 (2.23-2.25)
NETM-22 (2.27 & 2.28). Improper instrument mounting and lack of corrosion / oxidation control can lead to premature device failum.
- Differential pressure transmitters mounting screws & star washers on 3SWP*PDIS 24A, B, C, D, and pressure transmitters 3SWP-PDIS 110A, B, C, D located in intake structure / pump house show significant signs of oxidation / cor70sion. These instruments are exposed to a satt air atmosphere. The mounting screws, nuts and washers also may no longer meet seismic mounting and ASTM qualifications.
Insltrument 3SWP PDIS 1108 mounting screw does not have a star washer under screw head and no longer meets vendor mourtling instructions.
Review Vand invalid Needed Date Ininetor: Server, T. L g y Q 11/26/97 VT Leed: Nort, Anthony ^ G O O 11'2$'a7 VT Mgr: Schopfer, con K G O O 52rss97 22/sig7 1RC Chmn: Singth Anand K G O O Printed 2/16/9s 2-47.33 PM Page i or 2 l
i DR No. DR MP3 0226 Northeast Utiinies ICAVP Misiotone unit 3 Discrepancy Report mala Date: 2/16/98 mesotunoN. Disposition:
NU has concluded that Discrepancy Report, DR-MP3-0226, has identified a condnion not previously discovered by NU which requires correction. This discrepancy meets the criteria specified in NRC letter B16901 and 17010. It has been screened per U3 PI-20 criteria and found to have no operabilMy or reportabliny concems and meets the Unit 3 deferral criteria. CR MS-96-0165 has been written to develop and track resolution of this Nem per RP-4.
Conclusion:
NU has concluded that Discrepancy Report, DR MP3-0226, has identified a condnion not previously discovered by NU which requires corredion. This discrepancy meets the criteria specified in NRC letter B16901 and 17010. It has been screened per U3 PI-20 criteria and found to have no operability or reportabilMy concems and meets the Unit 3 deferral crMeria. CR M3-96-0165 has been written to develop and track resolution of this hem per
- RP-4.
Prevemely identined by NU? U Yes (9) No Non Diec.W Cenetton?Q Yes @ No w%P.nmastO v= @ N. ~% uor ev.dtO v= @ No novie Ir44etor: Womer,1, VT Lead: Nerl, Anthony A b N VT Mer: Schopfer, Don K O O O unc chmn: Singh, Arend K osee: 2/16/98 st commenes The corrective action is not apparent from the DR description or from CR MS 96-0185.
It is not apparent why maintenance to 3SWP*PDIS24A, B, C and D can be deferred to after startup. In addition, it is not spparent if there are any two over one considerations evaluated for the non 1E devices.
Printed 2N6/96 2'47:37 PM PeGe 2 of 2
DR No. DR MP3 0228 Northeast Utilitie. ICAVP Millstorm Unit 3 Discropancy Report moview aroup: conagwamen on nesOLUTION REJECTED neview element: spamm ensesammen
- +==:iae o=en o y ,,
eleerepency Type: Instaannen in,someressen g, syenemerooses: Ras NRC signiacense les at: 4 pote FAXad to NU:
osse Puhashed: 12!2147 r . ii instrument Label 6ng t ^ . The following labeling inadequacies wRh resped to design documents and requirements of Procedure OA 9,' System and Component Labeling,* were noted during system walkdowns.
- 1. Instrument 3RSS TE28A was to be retagged per Table 2, page 3 of Change Control Documerit T.C-0664C The installed instrument is still identifled as P683 TE28A.
- 2. Pressure transmitter 3RSSPT25A as shown on orawing BK.
16P 564 Rev. C was identified based on its location and connedion to sensing line 3RSS*PT25A, The instrument is incorredly tagged as' spare.'
noview vand invahd Needed cele O $2/is7 inauetor: Server, T. L. O O VT Land: Nerl, Anthory A Q Q Q 12!547 D D 12/its7 VT Ingt: schepest, oen K G pic counn: singh, Anend K Q Q Q 12/1147 a osse:
INVALID:
oste: 2/16/98 nesOLUTION. Disposition:
NU has concluded that Descrepancy Report, DR-MP3-0228, has identified a condMion not preytnus'/ discovered by NU which requires corredion. This discrepancy meets the crMeria specified in NRC letter B16901 and 17010. It has been screened per U3 Pl.
20 criteria and found to have no operability or reportathlity concems and meets the Unit 3 deferral criteria. CR M3 96-0137 has been written to develop and track resolution of this item per RP-4.
Conclusion:
NU has concluded that Discrepancy Report, DR-MP3-022!t, has identified a condition not previously discovered by NU whicti requires corredion. This discrepancy meets the criteria specified in 14RC letter BtS901 and 17010. It haw been screened per U3 PI-20 criteria and found to have no operability or reportability concems and ineets t'ie Unit 3 deferral criteria. CR M3 98-0137 has been written to develop and track resolution 01 this item per RP-4.
=_%,>- - - ,, men c 3 v= feuto - - c - -- -"-- - - ' r T v= (*) ma Pepe 1 or 2 Printed 2/1tW96 2 46.06 PM A
ICAVP DR No. DR4Mit8 Northeast Utilities unstone unit 3 Discrepancy Report - -- - --
n m m.a P-
- wt O v @m -unr=*.etO va @m n
Wee'er. Wemw,I. ## '
O O- O =
VT Lame: Nort, Areony A O O O N VT Mor: schopfer, Den K unc chen; singh, Anand K Dah: 2/1tV96 sLcean nas: Based on CR MS-96-0137 is is nd apparent why the labeling changes can be deferred based on the defensi criteria.
" Plant lateling discrepancies which have a dired impad on plant configuration, operation or pomonnel safety. Other labeling discrepancies (e.g. use of dashes Instead of asterisks in labels) may be deferred."
PrWed 2/16M5 2A6:10 PM Page 2 or 2
ICAVP DR No. DR44P3 0617 Northeast Umkles p weistone unu 3 Discrepancy Repoft Moverw Group: system DR RESOLUTION REMCTED medew teamem: system Design onesepane: Moonerical Deni'"
Om 4ecrepency Type: Componert Date g sy h :RBs NRC sioniteense level: 4 Date faxed to NU:
Date Peddlehed: 12/847
~~
06ecrepency: Inconsistency Letween FLAR Sec 6.1.1.1 and component design wl/ reaped to Regulatory Guide 1.44 osecrepakm: Accesgg,g to FSAR Section 6.1.1.1, the use of stainless steel is in accordance with Regulatory Guide 1.44. ,
The Regulatory Guide states that undabilizerl, austenitic stainless steel of the AISI Type 3XXX series used for components that are part of syWems required for emergency core cooling shall meet the following:
- 1. Materleir from which components and sydems are to be fatricated shall be solution heat treated to produce a non sensitired condition lo the material,
- 2. Non sene',tization of the mateiial shall be verified using ASTM A 262-70.
FSAR Tablee 1.81 and 1,8N-1 stato that WeWin0 house pmcess spucifica?.lon 84201 may be used for teding instead of ASTM A-2t2 70.
The design specifications fcr the following Type 304 and 304L stainless steel components in the containment meirculation spray system do not require testing for non sensitization of austenitic stainless deel' material:
RSS Orifice Plates 3RSS*RO39A.B RSS Spectacle Flanges 3RSSTLG3A,B,C.D Reference spedfications are:
1 2472.210190 Revisico 3 2260.000 966 Revision 10 2280.000-582 Revision 12 Rosew vand invaud reser ed Deee innletor: FeirW. D. J. @ Q Q 11/17 S 7 vit.ed: M, Arewy A g Q Q 11/1847 vimen schapen,oenx 0 O 12ris7 0 12/457 iRc comm: sinen. Anone x - G O O osie:
DNaLE):
__.T oste: 2/10/96
^
REsoLUTloN. Disposition:
Printed 2/1W96 2'46.153 PM Pese 1 or 3 l
ICAVP DR No. DR4P3MIT Norttwast utsties umstone unit 3 Discrepancy Report NU has concluded that DR MP3-0617 does not represent a discrepent condMion. The use of the Westin0 house Process Specification M201 to perfom verification of non sensitization of material is acceptable and is consistent with Regulatory Guide 1.44. Westinghouse Specification H201 requires testing of sustenitic stainless steel to be in accordance with ASTM 262, Predice A or E ( See attached P.S. 64201 MW-MX) This addressas issue number 2 of DR MP3-0617. Additionally, specifications for the components identified in DR MP3 0617 -
require that the components be solution annealled and water quenened. This predice produces non-sensitized steel. The performance of the solution annealling and water quenching of the spedfied components can be verified by the Certified Materials Test Reports ( See Attached CMTRs). This addresses issue number 1 of DR-MP3-0617.
Significance level criteria does not apply as this is not a discrepant edition.
Conclusion:
NU has concluded that DR-MP3-0617 does not represent a discrepant condition. The use of the Westin0 house Process Specification 84201 to perfom verification of non-sensitization of material is acceptable and is consistent with Regulatory Guide 1.44. Westinghouse Specification 84201 requires testin0 of austenitic stainless steel to be in accordance with ASTM 262, Pract:ce A or E ( See attached P.S. 84201 MW MX ).
Additionally, the components identified in DR MP3-0617 have been solution annealled and water quenched as verified by the Certified Materials Test Reports ( See Attached CMTRs) to produce a non-sensitized condition in the material as required.
Significance level criteria does not apply as this is not a discrepent condition.
Pmiously idonemed key Nu? U Y.e @ No Non F ," Con # con?U Yes @ No
- n muonP.ndinstO va @ No n *conunrae.dtO va @ wo n.,*w
~
Intelesor: Feingold. D. J.
O 8 O 2noss ;
m.o : u,,,, % =
VT Mgr: schopfer. Don K O O O 0 "
wic chmn: singh, Anand K g g osse: 2/10/98 stconme: The Northeast Utlinios responses says,"The performance of the solution anneallin0 and water quenching of the specifMK!
components can be verified by the Certified Materials Test Reports". The discrepent condition is that the subject desi0n/ purchase specifications do not require verification of non-sensitization in accordance with Westinghouse Specification 84201 or ASTM-262. The discrepancy report does not dispute the fact that the subject materials are de-sensitized via solution annealling.
Printed 2ntale 2-46:57 PCA PeGe 2 or 3
Not# wast Utinties ICAVP_ DR No. DRW3433 g
- minstorm unit 3 Discrepancy Report no ,: Pre ensee on nasoumon naaseTuo -
notted Element: Cerronese Assen Process O veo pioneepeney Type: Coneemos Aasen g g, S,1 - --- N/A NRC signennense inet: 3 - Date faxed to NU:
Date Published: 11/Mg7 f . -,. Criterna Determining which Vendor Technical Manuals Need Upgrading by Startup Dece'ipoten: Adverse CondRion Report (ACR) 013783 is part of the "out-of.
scope" Tier 3 review of corrective adions,' The ACR deals with a -
procedure inadequacy which affects the maintenance of reactor trip switchgoer. This ACR, to9 ether with other corrective action documents such as ACR MS 97 0205 and ACR 10662, addresses the broeder problem of vendor technical manual ._
inadequeoles reisted to updating manuals with current vendor recommendations.
8edion 1,7 of Procedure DC 16, Revision 0, is titled " interim Recovery of Xey Safety Reisted Vendor Technical Manuals".
Sedion 1.7 defines key safety related equipment as:
" Components which in the performance of their safety-related fundsore, change operating modes or positions", M is our-understanding that most of these key manuals will be uporaded during Phase 2 (after startup),
No ctMeria or schedule was found, however, for determinin0 when vendor technical manuals will be up0raded. Additionally, it was not evident which manuals will be up0raded by startup, noview ,
vand twelhi Needed Dale initialer: Sheppard, R. P. G O O 11me7 VT Lead: Ryan, Themes J - e .O -O timer VT Ingr: schapter, oen K S O O ~
11/1 * '7 -
IRC Cluun: segh, Anand K @
11/1997-Date: 11/7/97 INWALEh 1
cate: 2/11/96 RESOLUTION: Disposition:
NU has concluded that the issue reported in Discrepancy Report, DR MP3 0623, does not represent a discrepent condition. The crMeria for the key safety islated equipment list (KSREL) is defined in DC-16, Revision 0, Change 2, Section 1.6. The procedure requires that each Unit develop and maintain a Unit specific Key Safety Related Equipment List to include:
Consideration of primary safety si0 nificart components based upon desi0n complex #y, active safety fundion and the fundamental need to fundion upon demand.
Identification of associated safety significant components that Pmted 2n@9s 2 #.:s1 PM Page 1 or 4
ICAVP DR No. DRM23 Northeast utsties mm torm ure - Discrepancy Report provide critical support functions to the primary components.
The Key Safety Related Equipment Ust (KSREL) for non-NSSS equipment at Millstone Unt 3 is comprised of 1149 components r+:::-3: by 29 Vendor Technical Manuals (VTM). Technical Evaluation M3-EV 970326. Revision 0," Key Safety Related Equipment List Components Selection at Millstone Unit 3" documents the list and its basis.-
The KSREL selection addresses the safety fundions of; Make-up weler to maintain S/G's as heat sie DC control power Ultimate heat sink coolin0 water flow Cooling water flow to vitalloads Cooling weler flow to critical ECCS pumps (charging Pump and SI)
Motor operator fundionality for GL 69-10 MOVs AvalletWilly c( emergency elodrical power including engine, generator, bus transfers, ur6 Reactor trip Control Room habitability (air conditioning)
Containment depressurization The KSREL documented in Techn! cal Evaluation MS-EV.
970326, Revision 0, represents Northeast Utilities' commitment
' for Millstone 3 relative to Generic Letter 90-03 " Relaxation of Staff Position in Generic Letter 83-28, hem 2.2", including Supplement 1.
Attachment 2 provides the schedule for " upgrading" the VTMs manada*ed with the Key Safety Related Components identified in Technical Evaluation MS EV 970326, Revision 0. It should be noted that AR897020780 tracks the completion of the entire list of manuals on Attachment 2. There are only 9 manuals remaining to be completed at this time and all are well on their way to completion. . The remaining KSREL VTMs will be "up0raded" by February 15,1996. Completion of the 29 VTMs -
associated with the KSREL fulfills NU's commitment to GL 90-03.
As an " engineering improvement item", a long term VTM
" upgrade" effort is also scheduled (a portion of which is referred to as " Phase 2"in the DR). The scope of this effort -
encompasses VTMs for safety related components which, in the performance of their safety-related functions, chan0e operating modes or positions. While "up0raded" to the same criteria, the components associated with these VTMs are not part of the KSREL A baselining effort to identify all vendor technical publications associated with the enhancement effort is currently underway, it s is estimated that the overall VTM enhancement program for Millstone Unit 3 will require approximately 18 months to W complete.
Pnnled 2/1e98 2 49:35 PM Page 2 or 4
ICAVP. DR No. DRW3428 Netheast utsties umstaw unit : Discrepancy Report
- The full scope of the 16 month " betterment" has not been oc:npistely defined. Scopo dennition is ongoing with consideration given to common vendors and equipment bolwoon multiple tinits, maintenance and design edivity history as well as Rolietdlity Centeiod Maintenance information. Baseline of all vendor " publication" data is also ongoing to identWy .
commonalities and for provision to PRC/ USA for continuine vendor recontracts. A/R 97026036 is trackin0 development of a long term schedule.
NSSS manuals are not included in the initial
- upgrade
- scope.
NU is in continuous conted with the vendor (e.g., vendor representatives are on alte) and the majority of VTM information is prwessed via Nuc6 ear Safety En0i neering via NOQP 3.04.
Si0nificance level crMeria do not apply here as this is not a discrepent condition.
Conclusion:
NU has concluded that the issue repo4ed in Discrepancy Report, DR-MP3-0623, does not represent a discrepent condition. The Key Safety Related Equipment List (KSREL) is documented in Technical Evaluation MS-EV-970326 Revision 0. There is a '
schedule for upgrading the VTMs associated with the Key Safety Relatec Equipment identified in Technical Evaluation MHEV-970326, Revision 0.To date,20 of the 29 KSREL VTMs have been upgraded and transmetted to Nuclear Document Services for distribution to Controlled Document Libraries. The remaining 9 KSREL VTMs will be upgraded by February 15, 1996.
Significance level crMeria do not apply here as this is not a descrepent condition.
Attachments: Technical Evaluation MS EV-970326, Millstone 3 KSREL and anaaelmaad Vendor Manuals Schedule, DC 16, Revision 0, Vendor Equipment Technical information Program (VETIP) ~
7... rg maus.d i,y wt u v. em -mam ,.uc.usu.atu v y=
- -p=enetO v. @m m .m.m.aune w ast O va @m .,
Intu. ton sheppard.R.P. **
VTLead: Ryan, Thames J O; c O E **
vineon schepen,oenK MC Ct.nn: sirgh. Anand K cas.: 2/11/96 at can.nenes: 1. The establishment of crMerla for determining when vendor technical manuals will be updated and the schedule presented for this up0rading are accardahle.
- 2. The application of the above criteria is not consistent. The KSREL should include appropriate components in the RSS Pnised 2Nass 243s PM Pese 3 or 4
M No, MWM23 Northeast Utilities ICAVP ministone Unit 3 Discrepancy Report system which were not supphed as part of the NSSS, e.g., the RSS pumps PrWed 2nSM 249:36 PM Pa08 4 of 4
DR No. DR.MP3 0644 Northeast Utilities ICAVP miistone Unit 3 Discrepancy Report Review Group: Operemone & Melrdenence and Tesurg DR RESOLUTION REJECTED Review Element: syeneminseensman op,,
Diecipune: opusea'* O vee D6ecrepency Type: 0 & M & T trgismentanon g sychnWProceae: N/A NRC signescence level: 4 Date faxed to NU:
Date Pddiohed: 11/2497 D6ecrepancy: Monitor light operation at the simulator does not match the f ant, Deecetps6on: The En0ineered Safety Features (ESF) monitor lights provide information in a concise grouping as to the status of important plant equipment. At the simulator, the power to individual ESF lights is from the same source as the equipment it monitors.
Therefore when power to the equipment is lost, its indication is l also lost At the plant, the power to individual ESF lights is from a more reliable source Safety Related DC, and equipment status would have been available, Observation of simulator training showed that the control room staff was confused by this loss of ESF monitor light indication.
This mismatch between the plant and simulator decreases the effectiveness of the training to the operators. Plant / simulator differences are to be minimized, but if they exist, then the differences are to be noted in the lesson plan, Notation of the difference was not contained in the lesson plan, Review Vaud inveNd Needed Dale O O siit2/97 inhieter: Pteniewice, R. G O O tiis2/97 VT Leed: sese, kan G YT Mer: schopser, Don K G O O 15'17/P7 wic chen: Singh, Anand K @ Q Q 11/19/97 Date:
INVAUD:
Dese: 2/13/96 REsOLUT1oN' NU has concluded that Descrepancy Report, DR MP3-0664, has identified a condition not previously discovered by NU which requires correction. This discrepancy meets the criteria specified in NRC letter B18901 and 17010, it has been screened per U3 PI-20 criteria and found to have no operability or reportability concems and meets the Unit 3 deferral criteria. CR M3-98-0137 has been written to develop and track resolution of this item per RP-4,O DOContinuationO O
Conchision:D NU has concluded that Discrepancy Report. DR-MP3-0664, has identified a condition not previously discovemd by NU which requires correction. This discrepancy meets the criteria specified in NRC letter B16901 and 17010. It has been screened per U3 PI-
^ 20 criteria and found to have no operability or reportability concems and meets the Unit 3 deferral criteria. CR M3-98-0137 has been written to develop and track resolution of this item per RP-4.
Page 1 of 2 Printed 2/16/9e 2:50.09 PM
s Northeest Utilities ICAVP' DR No MW3M Millstone Unit 3 Discrepancy Report 7;n ., identleed by NU7 V Yes @ No NonDWsepentConeNon?Q Yes @ No n wunonreamacO va @m % u.=ww.drO va @m Review
% p, g, &=th Not A~Th N=ded Does v7 Lead: sees,xen O G O mm VT Mor: schapser, Den x U lac chmn: singh, Anand K O O case: 2/13/98 st commente: Clarification of the proposed corrective action is not apparerd, The DR identifies that the operation of the simulator does not match the plant The proposed corrective adion does not Indicate if the difference will be noted in the lesson plans of if the computer will be rowired to ensure that the power to the individual ESF lights is different from the same source as the equipment that it monitors, k
k Printed 2tttW96 2 50:13 PM PeGe 2 of 2
Northeast UHino.e ICAVP DR No. DR4P8 0702 Millstone Unit 3 Discrepancy Report nwiew aroup: system Dn mool AmoN M#3CTED l nwiew samment: system Desip , ,,,,,,,,,,,,,
D6*alpline: Moohenical Desie O vee Dieuepency Type: Dreveg g g, s, ___ . _ ; Hvx NnC sientacance Iwel: 4 Date faxed to leu:
Date pv.diohed: 12/2097 eneorepency: HVAC P&lD D6screpanc6es' Deecrir' Ann: During review nf the auxiliary building ventilation system, supplemetaary leak col 6edion and release system, and emergency generator enclosure ventilation system the following discrepancies on the piping & instrumentation diagrams were identified.
- 1. 'The fall positica vont direct 6on for the following solenold
- valves is show incorrectly 9n EM 148A:
3HVR*SOV448 3HVR*SOV4481 3HVR*SOV44A 3HVR*SOV44A1 3HVR*SOV428
- 2. The fail positkm of 3HVR*AOD42B,3HVR AOD438 are not shown on EM 148A.
i 3 Drain lines for MCC and Rod control Area air conditioning i units,3HVR*ACU1 A/B are not shown on EM 148A
- 4. PalD EM-1500 does not show the class break between tim non safety related normal exhaust duct and safety related tomado dampers 3HVP DMPT2A-D.
natow Vand inveild N; And Date Insiston stout,M.D. O O tJ 12/11/'7 r vTteed: Ne'l ^a'"ar ^ Q O O 12/11/87 VT Men schapter. Den K O O O saittie7 inc chmn: sirgh, Anand K O O O 12/1**7 Date:
INVM m:
ones: 2/13/96 nasottmoN: NU has concluded that Discrepancy Report, DR MP3-0702, has identified a condition not previously discovered by NU which requires corredion. This discrepancy meets the criteria specified In NRC letter B16901 and.17010 it has been screened per U3 PI-20 criteria and found to have no operability or reportability concems an' meets the Unit 3 deferral crMeria. CR MS 98-0514 has been wrMten to develop and track resolution of this item per RP-4.
Prtreed 2/16Ss 2:s1:00 PM Page 1 of 1
Northeast utilmes ICAVP DR No. DR4P34m Millstone Ur* 3 Discrepent,y Repor*.
l- Atteements:
l CR MS 96-0514 r../-- r; monenes by wt U Yes @ me men omwepent connuentU Yo. @ No n ews p.amastO v @ n. n imi.a m t O vs. @ u.
m innheen sted.M.D. 2/$m
.yrt : m%g O O O VT Men schapser,DenK U **
mec w % An.wx Date: 2/13/98 0 b O et cannmes: Response needs to address basis why adding the SLCRS lt,,et vano dampers to the P&lD (item 5 of DR) is cons 6dered a viewing enhancement that can be deforfed.
Printed 2/199s 2:51M PM Page 2 of 2
Northeast utsties ICAVP DR % DR*P81*
umstorm Unit 3 Discrepancy Report t
neviewereup: system pnvAup i
neview easmem: correos Aenen pronome piecipane: m 0"*'
Descrepeney vype: carressve Amen ;
^~ O vm 8,1.7 : NEW gg E 800nlesena twd: 3 Date FAsad to NW:
Does Puheshed:
,- + UIR 970 is not implemented as stated in the Discrepancy Closure Request Daccipelen: FSAR CR 974P342 resolves all issues identified in UlR 970.
However, the Discrepancy Closure Requests identifies chan0es to FSAR Table 6.242 that are not implemented in FSAR CR 97-MPS42. These are:
- 1. _ Under
- Quench Spray Pump Check Valve Sticks Closed",
the Closure Request states that FSAR Table 6.242 le modified to remove references to testing the subject valve, FSAR CR 97-MP3 82 chan0ed Table 6.242 to road,
' Valve la checked periodimely", deleting the following phisse, 'durino normal oper dion ' The Closure Request does not identify any procedures or surveillances that test the quench spray pump check valves for sticking.
Therefore, a procedure cannot be confirmed to exist which periodically verifies that the subject check valves do not to stick closest.
- 2. Under "Recirculat!on Spray Cooler Tube /Shell Rupture",
the Closure Request states that FSAR Table 6.242 is modified to show that the coolers are dosloned to ASME Ill Class 2 for the tube side and ASME Ill Class 3 for the shell sid6. FSAR CR 97 MP3-82 klentifies the cooler as bein0 desi0ned to ASME Ill Class 2 This is incorrect because the Table is refering to a rupture of the tube sloe or the sheil side, and the shell side is desi0ned to Class 3.
noiew vens inved Needed Dee Inluebert Feingold,D.J, 9 O O 2 rase VT Leet Nwl, Armony A Q Q .Q 2Me vr naar: seapew. Den x 0 O O 2"2*'
inc ces==: airvi,Anansx G O O 2'4**
Date:
m2m:
Date:
nE80LUTION:
m/ _ J, identemed liy NU? D vos (e) No ben F " C on delen? ( ) vos (o) Ne
-PeannetO va @ No nammionunroedvedrO va @ No neview
'/" . Not Asseptable NoAnd Date VT Land: Nerl, Archony A O O Prtreed 2/1W 2:52:31 PM - .
Page 1 or 2
ICAVP M k M 4 PS- M 1 Northecst Utilities Ministone Unit 3 Discrepancy Report 4
- - - -
- a B o u ome:
SL Comments:
l I
i ,
I
{
l I
I i
l l
I t
A l
~~
Page 2'of 2 Premed 2/18462:52;35 PM
. _ _ . . . _ _ _ , _ _ _ . . _ _ _ _ _ . . . . _ . , _ _ . _ . . _ . __ _ _ , . _ . . . - _ _ . ~ , - - . , . _ _ _ _ , _ ,. .,
i ICAVP DR No. DRW8@2 Northeast utstion umstone unit 3 - Discrepancy Report -
nwww aroup: AceMars hampemen DRvAuD mwlow Etene e: syntem Design ,,,,,,, ,,,,,,
Daseipe=: one g y, Dwerepeney Type: uoeneine Doorw' O No e , .- - - . , - : N/A NRC algninoense twel: s Date F Axed k DA):
Does puhashed:
Discrepency: Implementation of Leakape Control Pro 0 ram Per Technical Specification 56.4.4 Could Nct Be Vertfled Dwertpelen: Millstone Unit 3 Technical Specifications $6.8.4 requires the establishrr,ent,implemeMation and maintenance of a program to reduce leaka0e from those portions of systems outside containment that could contain highly radioactive fluids durin0 a serious transient or accident to as low as predical levels. The systems include the recirculation spray, safety injection, chargin0, and t. %9en recombiners. This pro 0 ram is required to include the fo.iowing:
- 1) Preventative maintenance and periodic visual inspectWi requirements, and
- 2) Integrated leak test requirements for each system et refueling cycle intervals orless.
NU committed to this program in FSAR S 5.2.5.5, and lettom to the NRC dated October 1,1965 and November 6,1965. 88ER, Revision 4, $15.0.15 found the program as riescribed above acceptable.
The implementation of this program, as described in Technical Spedfication $6.6.4, could not be confirmed.
Revkw Valld invelld Neot%d Date initiator: Peebles, W. R. 8 O O 2'1o**
VT Leed: Rehele. Rel D D D 0 meines
. VT Mort schepier Den K 9 O O 2/12/**
IRC Chmn: sirgh, Anand K G O O at:4ee Date:
DNAUD:
Dates mEs0LUTtoN: )
N. r;identined by Nut U Yes @ No NonDewrepentcondition?Q Yee T No nachm nrenenetO Y= @ No naokaanunr=*estO Ya @ No rw g ^-;'" Not areald ahta N .ted Dale VT Leed: Rehefe,Rel0 0 0 O vi mon schap=, Den k 0 '
1RC Chmn: singh, Anand K O
O O Date:
et commente:
Printed 2/16es 2 53:37 PM Pepe 1 or 1
DR No. DR MP31934 Nomast Utmties ICAVP Millstone Unit 3 Discrepancy Report Revtow aroup: system DRVAuD Review Element: Me*noemen Dwign , ,,,,,,,,,
Olselpane: Mechanteel Desi'"
O va Desoropency Type: Drevdne gg armenWProcese: NEW NRC signiacense level: 4 Date faxed le Nu:
Date Puhashed:
r+ ~ . ca Modificat6on DCR M3 97045 does not appropriately update P&ID EM-1120 to refied changes.
Desertpoen: Modification DCR M3-97045 adds vent lines for the containment recirculat6on sprey pumps. These vent lines sie each provided with a test connedion isolated by a valve. DCNs DMS 001520-97, DM3-00152197 DMS-001522 97, & DMS-001523 97 show these isoletion valves to be globe valves on P&lD EM 112C.
DCNs DMS-01 1520 97, DMS 01 152197, DMS-01 1522 97, &
DMS-01 1523 97 change these valves to gate valves but do not chan0e P&lD EM 1120 to show them as a gate valve instead of a Globe volve.
Review vand invand Needed Date Inteleter: Feingold, D. J. O O O 2*ee
)
VT Leed: Neri, Anthony A O O O 2**e O afin/se vi Men sahapter, Den k Q O O 2'5 *ee IRC Chmn: singh, Anand K G O Date:
INVALID:
Dese:
RESOLUTloN.
Previousy henneined by Nut U ver ' @ No NonDiecrepentConduton?Q Yee @ No R iumwrenmastO va @m -unr=*edtO va @m Review Acceptahls Not ^ - - - " t' Needeu Date VT Lesel: Nori Anthony A O O Q V f Mgr; schop%r, Don K O g IRC Chmn: singh,.Wnd K O O O Dele:
el Commente:
Pege 1 of 1 Printed 2/1tWes 2:54:12 PM
DM No. DR4P31984 Northeast UuuWes ICAVP ministone Unit 3 Discrepancy Report Review aroup: system DRVAuD Review stamud: $% Design Olmir am:laschenu iDesign g y,,
Desereseney type: Dromeg g, s, _ . : NEW NRC Signikeense level: 4 Date FAXedle NU:
Date puhtehed:
Disorepenry: Modif6 cation DCR MS 97045 does not appiepriately update PalD EM 112C to reflect changes,
^
t -. Modifloation DCR MS-97045 adds vent lines for the containment recirculation sprey pumps These vent lines are each provided with a test connection isolated by a valve. DCNs DMS-001520-97, DMS-00152197, DMS-001522 97, & DMS-001523-97 show these Isolation valves to be Globe valves on P&lD EM 112C.
DCNs DMS-011520 97 DM3-01152197 DMS-011522 97, &
DMS 01 1523 97 ci ange these valves to gate valves but do not chan0e P&lD EM 112C to show them as a Data valve instead of a globe valve, Review vand invahd Needed Date intilater: FeNeed,D.J. 0 O O 2***
O 2498 VT Leed: Nort, Anthony A O O VT teert schopfer Den K O O O 2/12/9s O 2/5 ***
iRC Ces= s%h, Anand K O O 3 Date:
INVAUD:
Date:
RESOLUTtoN:
Prev 6ously identessJ by NUT U Yee @ No NonD6screpentCondtion?Q Yes @ No
,.eammenpenenetO Ya @ Ne -+ uar=*edrO Ya @ No R. view Acceptable Not A~ar8h Needed Date VT Leed: Nort, Arthony A O O O YT tigr: schapler, Den K O
IRC Chmn: 8%h, Anand K O
O O Date:
SL Commente:
Page1or1 PHnted 2/16/96 2M29 PM -
l ICAVP DR Nm DR 44P31C2 l Northeast Uumies Mmetone Unit 3 Discrepancy Report l R-ie. .,m ,: Pro ,.r= = DR vAun Rev6ew Element: Carroceve Aosen Process Diecipens: Mahaniel Dmi'"
- O Ya Die apency Type: Corrective Aesen lerr'amortsman g l' s, _ .- m oox NRC signiteenes twel: 4 Date Faxed to NU Date Puhelshed:
Deseropency: Closure Request for UIR 438 not completely supported by documents included in closure package Duartralen: 1. Closure Request whloh was provided for UlR 438 (NU tracking No,96008116-01) documents that pow Installation vibration checking during D/G run was not made when AWO MP3 87 0720 was implemented. To address this hem Closure Request states that vibration of on0ine, generator and associated systems is checked per per OPF .*orm 3346A 14 &15.
Contrary to the above OPS forms $346A 14 &15 provided in the closure packa0e do not contain a check for excessive vibration of engine, generator or associated systems dudng D/G run, 2, Work performed under AWO MS 9215905 involved the replacement of lube oil tubing. Vendor's (Colt's) letter #948-3800/91, dated 1/15/91 states "the higher frequencies of the stainlass tubing runs could possibly be excited by the en0lne, I therefore believe you should oordinue your practice of observing ,
the new tubing to detect any such new resonances", Additionally,
- letter MP 3M 90-87 dated 12/10/90 from NU to Vendor (Mana0er.
Beloit Customer Servloes), states in part, "when it is installed, our rolest requirements are to observe the tubin0 during a diesel I
l run to assure vibratiori ls not excessive, i.e., to eliminate any I
concem of work hardening the stainless steel".
l
' Contrary to thi above, documentation could not be found in the closure package to show that AWO MS-9215605 post installation vibration check was made during D/G run.
Note: *i h,re was evidence of post tubing installation vibration check durin0 subsequent D/G run for the other tubing replacements documented in the closure package Revbw Vesd invalid Needed Date insiseen Nov-re. ** 9 O O 25**
VT Leed: Ryan,Thomme J G O O 2***
vT uon scher w, s Dan k 8 O O stians O at14ee stC Chmn: singh, Anand K O O Dele:
NW4LB:
Date:
REsoLUTloN:
~
Previously identland by NUf U Yes @ No Non Discrepent Condition?O Yes @ No i-Printed 2/1ses 2:96:1s PM Pese 1 or 2
_ . - - - . - - _ - _ _ _ _ . ~ . _ , . - , _ .
Northeest Dundes ICAVP M* M*PS*2 uniistone unit 3 Discrepancy Report ,
ReeeMienPeneng?Q Vee (9) No meseMienunresehedtO Yes (@ No howlew Inleisters (none)
VT Leed: Ryan, Thomme J VT Mer: Schopfer, Den K O O O WitC Chmn: Singh, Anand K Date:
SL Commente:
(-
f Printed 2'1tW96 2.5622 PM PeGe 2 of 2
ICAVP DR No. DRMP31964 Northecst Utlittles Millstone Unit 3 Discrepancy Report Reviewareup: Aeonewsumpmen DR VM e Re w seemem: systen Desie
" ' " * ' " ' ' '"' O va D6eorspency Type: uoensing Dowmut g, s, _ _ . : N/A NRC signeseense level: 4 Date faxed to NU:
Date puMlehad:
r . :ii inconsistent Values in FSAR Table 15.64 t: J Calculation UR(B) 259 4, *Radiolo0l cal consequences due to a steam Generator tube rupture,' contains the Steam Generator Tube Rupture accident results presented in FSAR Table 15.0-8 and the activity releases in FSAR Table 15.64. The steam releases and feedwater flows presented in FSAR Table 15.64, howevir, are different from the steam flows used in the calculation.
Review Votid invetld Needed Date inmeten uv.on,w.J. O O O 2a VT Leed: Rehefe, Raid G U O 2/11d's VT Mgn Schapler Don K G O O 2t12/es O O 2'1*es IRC Chmn: Singh, Anand K G Ome:
ItWALD:
Date:
RESOLUTION:
7.;/x 'y identised by NUf Q Yes @ No Non D6 crepent Condition?Q Yes (9) No
""h ponding?O vos @ No R-munreseevedtO vos @ No Review s
j " Not .' ' / ' Needed M VT Leed: Reholm, Rel D D D D VT Mgr: Schopfer, Don K IRC Chmn: 6%h, Anand K Date:
SL Commente:
F1nted 2/1tWes 2:56:56 PM PeGe 1 of 1 h
Northeast Utlinnes ICAVP DR No. DR MP31066 Millstone Unn 3 Discrepancy Report
. newtow oremy: system onVAuo nev6 w element: system Deniyi Discipens:I s C Desi'"
F- , :p Type: Design Cortrol Procedure O v.
- sWP g
s,_. T NnC W level:d Date Faxed to NU:
DatePubashed:
F- . :6 Containment pressure transmitter rance in FSAR does not agree with calibration procedure.
" Per FSAR sodion 7.3.1.2 the containment pressure range is 0 to 60 pene.
FSAR table 7.51 identifies containment pressure range as 0 to 60 psia for type / category A1. B1, B2.
A review of l&C form 3447A01 1, Rev.4 and the calculat.on 3-ENG 185, Rev. 4 Indicates the calibrated range fo, the containment HI 1,2,3 instrumentation loops is 0 to 60 psia.
Review Vdid invahd Needed Date Inluetor: Hindle, R. O O O 2nse vr t=d: Nwl, Arthony A O O O 2**e VT Mgr schopfer, Den K @ Q Q 2/1248 inC Chmn: singh, Anand K B D D 2/i4es Date:
wwAuo:
Date:
REs0LUTioN:
previousey keenuned ty Nu? U Ya @ No Non Discrepent Conmuon?U Ya @ No nosocuponPenenetO Ya @m -+ unt drO va @ No Review
^^- "
Not . =7' Date VT 1.and: Herl, Anthony A VT Mgr: Schopfer, Don K 1RC Chmn: singh, Anand K O O 9' Date:
sL comments:
Prireed 2/1696 2.96.29 PM Page 1 of 1
__, , . , . -..__ _ _., _ _ _ _ _ - _ . _.