ML20199J863
| ML20199J863 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Oyster Creek |
| Issue date: | 12/31/1985 |
| From: | Fiedler P GENERAL PUBLIC UTILITIES CORP. |
| To: | Murley T NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8604090596 | |
| Download: ML20199J863 (22) | |
Text
.i u -
L 1985 ANNUAL ENYIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT 1
OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION 1
Prepared For the Oyster Creek Environmental Technical Specifications Appendix B to License No. OPR-16 Docket No. 50-219 by GPU NUCLEAR CORPORATION MARCH 1986 e
8604090596 851231 PDR ADOCK 05000219
{6 1
R PDR 1 't
1.0 Introduction This document is the Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station (OCNGS)
Annual Environmental Operating Report ( AEOR) for 1985.
It is submitted in accordance with Section 4.5.1 of the Oyster Creek Environmental Technical Specifications (OCETS).
The OCNGS is a single cycle, forced circulation, boiling water reactor of 620 MWe maximum (summer) dependable net capability, owned by Jersey Central Power a Light Company and operated by GPU Nuclear Corporatinn.
The OCNGS is located in Lacey Township, Ocean County, New Jersey.
The plant is subject to Provisional Operating License No. DPR-16 pursuant to Docket No. 50-219. The date of initial reactor criticality was May 3, 1969 and the commercial generation of power began on December 23, 1969.
This AEOR covers the period from January 1,1985 through December 31, 1985. The report is organized such that Sections 2.0 and 3.0 correspond to those same sections in the OCETS.
However, due to differences in the required reporting dates of various studies conducted in accordance with the OCETS, reports of those studies have been or will be submitted under separate cover and will not be duplicated in this report.
In each of these instances, a confirmation of the filing of the required reports is provided in the appropriate section of the AEOR. All data which are otherwise required to be presented in the AEOR are included in this repo rt.
2.0 Environmental Monitoring i
This Section of the AE0R outlines the urtous environmental monitoring programs to be conducted under Section 2.0 of the OCETS, and provides the status of submission of reports on these various programs. The reporting requirements of the studies required in Section 2.0 do not coincide with the required due'date of the AEOR.
Meteorological data are contained in the Semi-Annual Effluent Release Reports which were submitted on August 30, 1985 with addendum dated November 4,1985 covering the first six (6) calendar months of 1985 and on March 1,1986 covering the last six (6) calendt months of 1985.
These data are therefore incorporated by reference into this AEOR and are not duplicated here.
2.1-Biotic - Aquatic Section 2.1.1 of OCETS specifies the following studies:
a)
Impingement of Organisms 1.
Conventional Traveling Screens 2.
Fish Return System b)
Fish Kill Monitoring Program In addition to the above noted studies perfomed in accordance with OCETS Section 2, studies requested by USEPA and NJDEP were perfomed during the 1985 report period in support of the OCNGS Section 316 (a a b) Demonstration. As noted in our July 6,1984 letter, the OCETS Section 2 and additional Section 316 Demonstration studies would be coordinated. Since the additional Section 316 study schedule is somewhat different than the OCETS Section 2 study schedule, the estimated submission date for all data will be the end of May,1986 for the'198S report period rather than March,1986 as would nomally be required by OCETS Section 2.
There were no reportable fish kills during the report period so a separate Fish Kill Monitoring Program report will not be filed for the report period. Any supplemental infomation regarding the Fish Kill Monitoring Program will be included in the above noted May, 1986 report.
l l
l.
.r
3.0 Special Monitoring and Study Activities This Section of the AEOR presents the results of the two special monitoring and study activities required by Section 3 of the OCETS.
3.1 Woodborer Monitoring Program This program has reporting requirements which are different from the other DCETS programs.
During the reporting period the following submittals were made:
a)
The 39th Quarter Report covering the period from November 1, 1984 to January 31, 1985 was submitted on March 14, 1985.
b)
The 40th Quarter Report covering the period from February 1, 1985 to April 30, 1985 was submitted on June 18, 1985 c)
The 41st Quarter Report covering the period from May 1,1985 to July 31, 1985 was submitted on September 27, 1985, d)
The 42nd Quarter Report covering the period from August 1, 1985 to October 31, 1985 was submitted on December 10, 1985.
In addition, as per the OCETS, an annual report for the Woodborer Monitoring Program will be submitted by the end of May 1986.
Therefore, no results of this program are presented herein.
3.2 Unusual or Important Environmental Events There were no occurrences of unusual or important environmental events during this reporting period.
d __
4.0 Additional Information This Section of the AEOR reports any additional information that is required by Section 4.5.1 of the OCETS:
a)
All OCETS non-compliances and the corrective action taken to remedy them.
b)
Changes made to State and Federal permits and certificates which pertain to the requirements of OCETS.
c)
Changes in station design which could involve an environmental impact.
d)
Changes to the OCETS.
4.1 Summary of OCETS Non-Compliances There were no Non-routine Environmental Operating Reports filed with the NRC during this reporting period.
However, included as Attachnent I are copies of non-compliance reports submitted to the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection during this reporting period for non-compliances with l
NJPDES Pennit No. NJ 0005550.
These permit non-compliances were i
minor in nature and did not result in a significant impact to public health or the environment.
4.2 Summary of Changes Made to Federal and State Permits And Certificates Which Pertain to the Requirements of OCETS There were no changes to Federal or State permits and certificates which impacted on the OCETS during the reporting period.
i However, on October 8,1985 the New Jersey Department of l
Environmental Protection (NJDEP) issued an amendment to OCNGS NJPDES Permit No. 0005550 to include a discharge to groundwater from the hardcoal filter backwash infiltration pit.
The amendment l
was effective January 1,1986.
l 4.3 Summary of Changes in Station Design Which Could Involve an Environmental Impact a)
A stainless steel intake test screen was installed in 1985 to
, test whether intake screens should be replaced with new stainless steel screens to reduce screen maintenance downtime. Test results indicated that screen replacement would reduce screen maintenance downtime and screen replacement for all intake screens is planned. This l
modification when completed should have a positive environmental impact.
hec.am%
=ye mg%
4.4 Summary of Changes to the OCETS Amendment No. 83 dated May 30, 1985 to the DCETS authorized changes to marine woodborer exposure panels sites No. 8, 9 and
- 16. These changes were requested due to tampering and vandalism of the exposure panels in their locations prior to Amendment No. 83. Exposure panel locations appear on Table 3-1 pages 3-5 and 3-6 of the OCETS.
Relocation of exposure panels were as follows:
a)
Site No. 8: Relocated from R.R. Bridge Crossmember - Oyster Creek R.R. Bridge - Discharge Canal to Bulkhead - 1500 ft.
East of Oyster Creek R.R. Bridge-Discharge Canal, b)
Site No. 9: Structure to be used for suspension rack changed from R.R. Bridge Crossmember to Metal Pier.
c)
Site No. 16: Relocated from Berkely Yacht. Basin, J. Street, Seaside Park, N.J. to Bayside Boats, State Highway f35 and Bay Boulevard, Seaside Park, N.J.
m
)
.c I
.i i
ATTACMENT I l
I L
NON-COMPLIANCE-REPORTS FOR NJPDES i
PERMIT NO. NJ 0005550 FOR THE PERIOD l
JANUARY 1, 1985 THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 1985 j
e I
i f
l i
(.
f i
. l F
I I
t:
l f
I
=
4
( '
~
Initial Telephone Date of Report Date: February 6,1985 Occurrence: January 21, 1985 REPORT OF NONCOMPLIANCE WITH CONDITIONS OF NJPDES PERMIT NO. NJ 000 5550 REPORT NUMBER 000 5550/85/01 IDENTIFICATION OF OCCURRENCE:
Noncompliance with item 9b(1)b, page 4 of the pennit.
CAUSE OF NONCOMPLIANCE:
The circulating water discharge-intake temperature difference exceeded 23.00F.
DESCRIPTION OF NONCDHPLYING DISCHARGE:
As a result of severe icing and low water level at the intake structure, the volume of condenser cooling water being taken in was reduced.
This condition, even with all circulating water pumps in operation, ctused the 230F delta temperature limit to be exceeded from 0845 to 1030 hours0.0119 days <br />0.286 hours <br />0.0017 weeks <br />3.91915e-4 months <br />,1145 to 1245 hours0.0144 days <br />0.346 hours <br />0.00206 weeks <br />4.737225e-4 months <br />, and 1315 to 2245 hours0.026 days <br />0.624 hours <br />0.00371 weeks <br />8.542225e-4 months <br />.
The maximum delta temperature recorded was 24.30F.
DURATION OF NONCOMPLIANCE:
Total time 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> 15 minutes.
CORRECTIVE ACTION TO REDUCE THE NONCOMPLYING DISCHARGE:
Upon identification of the noncompliance, station personnel worked throughout the day to try and clear the ice from the intake structure in an effort to prevent restriction of circulating water flow in order to bring the delta temperature within the permit limit.
CORRECTIVE ACTION TO PREVENT RECURRENCE:
N/A. As recognized by condition 1S(3) of the permit circumstance beyond the control of the permittee may arise in which effluent limitations are exceeded.
as was the case with the severe icing and low water level at the intake structure.
Date: February 7,1985
Initial Telephone Date of Rep;rt Date: February 5,1985 Occurrence: January 22, 1985 REPORT OF NONCOMPLIANCE WITH CONDITIONS OF NJPDES PERMIT NO. NJ 000 5550 REPORT NUMBER 000 5550/85/02 IDENTIFICATION OF OCCURRENCE:
Noncompliance with item 9b(6)b, page 6 o'f the permit.
cal,SE OF NONCOMPLIANCE:
The discharge-intake temperature difference of the cooling water of the Aupented Offgas (A0G)-New Radwaste (NRW) System exceeded the permit limit of 270F. The temperature was 30.10F.
DESCRIPTION OF NONCOMPLYING DISCHARGE:
As a result of the heat load from the New Radwaste System, coupled with the availability of only one heat exchanger and one evaporator for operation, and i
with one heat exchanger out of service for maintenance conditions beyond the permittee's control prevailed; the delta temperature limiting condition was exceeded.
DURATION OF NONCOMPLIANCE:
The duration of the incident could not be determined.
l CORRECTIVE ACTION:
As stated in our March 1,1984 letter, the major heat load on the A0G-NRW discharge is the New Radwaste System; and that there will be instances in which compliance with the 270F delta temperature would not be attainable.
l Consequently, the station will operate the A0G-NRW System as efficiently as l
possible without causing damage to any of the system components.
l l
Date: February 7,1985
i Initial Telephone Date of Report Date: January 28, 1985 Occurrence: January 25, 1985 REPORT OF NONCOMPLIANCE WITH CONDITIONS OF NJPDES PERMIT NO. NJ 000 5550 REPORT NUMBER 000 5550/85/03 IDENTIFICATION OF OCCURRENCE:
Noncompliance with item 1, page 2 of the pemit.
CAUSE OF NONCOMPLIANCE:
The discharge of any pollutant not authorized by the pemit constitutes a violation of the tems and conditions of the permit.
DESCRIPTION OF NONCOMPLYING DISCHARGE:
4 During a sampling procedure it was detemined that the level of the Turbine i
Building Closed Cooling Water Chemical Addition Tank was too high which would not allow the addition of new material to the tank.
Consequently, fifteen (15) gallons of diluted Drewgard 4109 (Sodium borate) with a concentration of 176 ppm was inadvertently discharged to the discharge canal, instead of being pumped into the Turbine Building Closed Cooling Water System or to Radwaste per the nom.
In this instance, drainage from the Chemical Addition Tank was emptied into the 1-5 sump which drains into the 30" header with the terminus of its discharge into the discharge canal.
DURATION OF NONCOMPLIANCE:
Unknown, however less than 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />.
l CORRECTIVE ACTION TO REDUCE THE NONCOMPLYING DISCHARGE:
The discharge occurred before corrective action could be taken.
CORRECTIVE ACTION TO PREVENT RECURRENCE:
Valve V-29-1, wnich controls the drainage flow from the Chemical Addition Tank to the 1-5 sump, has been tagged to restrict use of the valve and cannot be operated without management authorization to do so.
l l
Date: February 7,1985
Date o'f Jn1tial Telephone Report Date:
May 2, 1985 Occurrence: April,1985 REPORT OF NONCOMPLIANCE WITH CONDITIONS OF NJPDES PERMIT NO. NJ 000 5550 REPORT NUM8ER 000 5550/85/04 IDENTIFICATION OF OCCURRENCE:
Noncompliance with item 12(b)(1), page 11 of the permit.
CAUSE OF NONCOMPLIANCE:
Failure to take a sample of the total suspended solids of the demineralizer wastes during April.
DESCRIPTION OF NONCOMPLYING DISCHARGE:
The Operations Department was conducting a regeneration of the make-up demineralizer, notification was not made to the Chemistry Department in order to have a Total Suspended Solids sample taken.
DURATION OF NONCOMPLIANCE:
Unknown.
CORRECTIVE ACTION TO REDUCE THE NONCOMPLYING DISCHARGE:
l N/A t
CORRECTIVE ACTION TO PREVENT RECURRENCE:
Past experence indicates that this was a one time break down in communications between the Operations and Chemistry Departments.
Requirement for notifying the Chemistry Department prior to start of regeneration will be conspicuously posted as a reference,for Operations personnel.
l l
Date: - May 6,1985 I
Initial Telephone Date o?
Report Date:
May 10, 1985 Occurrence: May 1, 1985 REPORTOFNONCONIANCEWITHCorOITIONSOFNJPDES PERMIT NO. NJ 000 5550 REPORT NUMBER 000 5550/85/05 IDENTIFICATION OF OCCURRENCE:
Noncompliance with item 9(0)(1)b, of the permit.
CAUSE OF NONCO@LIANCE:
The discharge-intake temperature difference of condenser cooling water exceeded 330F during a period when one or more circulating water pwps were not in operation.
DESCRIPTION OF NONC0 PLYING OISCHARGE:
Circulating Water Pump 1-3 was removed from service for maintenance at 0636 hours0.00736 days <br />0.177 hours <br />0.00105 weeks <br />2.41998e-4 months <br />. Circulating Water Pump 1-4 tripped and the discharge-intake temperature difference increased peaking at 33.80F at 1730 hours0.02 days <br />0.481 hours <br />0.00286 weeks <br />6.58265e-4 months <br />.
Circulating Water Pump 1-4 was returned to service at 1826 nours.
DURATION OF NONCOW LIANCE:
1730 hours0.02 days <br />0.481 hours <br />0.00286 weeks <br />6.58265e-4 months <br /> May 1, 1985 to 0451 hours0.00522 days <br />0.125 hours <br />7.457011e-4 weeks <br />1.716055e-4 months <br /> May 2, 1985.
CORRECTIVE ACTION TO REDUCE THE NONCO @ LYING OISCHARGE:
Plant personnel had initiated load reduction prior to exceeding tne discharge-intake temperature difference in an effort to maintain the delta temperature within the permit limits. Additionally, Oilution Pump 1-3 was placed into service at 1726 hours0.02 days <br />0.479 hours <br />0.00285 weeks <br />6.56743e-4 months <br />.
CORRECTIVE ACTION TO PREVENT RECURRENCE:
Tnis event occurred during plant maintenance of one of the Circulating Water Pt.nps. Appropriate action is continued operation with maximtsn runber of available Circulating Water Pumps to mitigate the effects of heat addition.
c Date: June 7, 1985
,m
,m
Dato Cf
' Initial Taleph:n3 Report Date:, June 27, 1985 Occurrence: June 27, 1985 REPORT OF NONCOMPLIANCE WITH CONDITIONS OF NJPDES PERMIT NO. NJ 000 5550 REPORT NUMBER 000 5550/85/06 IDENTIFICATION OF OCCURRENCE:
Noncompliance with item 9b(3), of the permit.
t I
~
CAUSE OF NONCOMPLI ANCE:
Screen 1-1 at the intake structure is out of service for maintenance and port 1-1 is closed. As a result, the average intake velocity was exceeded.
DESCRIPTION OF NONCOMPLYING DISCHARGE:
/
With only five screens and five ports in service at the intake structure, the condenser cooling water flow is obtained tarough a smaller area, thereby I
increasing the intake velocity over the normal operating regime of six screens
- six ports. The average intake velocity of 1.0 fps was exceeded at ports 2 and 3 with measured velocities of 1.06 fps and 1.30 fps respectively.
DURATION OF NONCOMPLIANCE:
The noncompliance was not identified until the data were collected and
(
analyzed.
CORRECTIVE ACTION TO REDUCE THE NONCOMPLYING DISCHARGE:
The intake screen at port one will be repaired and returned to service as soon as possible.
CORRECTIVE ACTION TO PREVENT RECURRENCE:
N.A. Periodic screen maintenance must be conducted as recognized by condition 15(3) of the permit.
i f
Date: July 8, 1985
\\
Initial Telepn:n2 Date of R: port Date: July 16, 1986 Occurrenco: July 15,1983 REPORT OF NONCOMPLIANCE WITH CONDITIONS OF NJP0ES PERMIT NO. NJ 000 5550 REPORT NUMBER 000 5550/85/01
. IDENTIFICATION OF OCCURRENCE:
Noncompliance with item 90(1)a, page 4 of the permit.
CAUSE OF NONCOMPLIANCE:
The condenser discharge temperature exceeded the permit ifmit of 106.00F.
DESCRIPTION OF NONCOMPLYING DISCHARGE:
As a result of high intake temperatures the condenser discharge temperture' exceeded the permit limit of 106.00F, attaining a maximum temperature of 106.80F.
DURATION OF NONCOMPLIANCE:
45 minutes CORRECTIVE ACTION TO REDUCE THE NONCOMPLYING OfSCHARGE:
The s'tation reduced power in order to lower the cordenser discharge temperature below 100.00F.
C0RRECTIVE ACTION TO PREVENT RECURRENCE:
N/A.
l
,date: August 7, 1985 s
I
J Initial Te10 phono Date of Report Date: July 19,1985 Occurrence: July 19,1985 l
REPORT OF NONCOMPLIANCE WITH CONDITIONS OF NJPDES l
PERMIT N0. NJ 000 5550 REPORT NUMBER 000 5550/85/08 IDENTIFICATION OF OCCURRENCE:
Noncompliance with item 9b(6), page 6 of the permit.
CAUSE OF NONCOMPLIANCE:
The discharge temperature, MBTU, and discharge intake temperature of the Augmented Offgas-New Radwaste discharge exceeded the permit limits.
DESCRIPTION OF NONCOMPLYING DISCHARGE:
As a result of ina'dequate service water flow and coupled with the fact that l
only one heat exchanger was in service the aforementioned parameters exceeded l
tne permit limits.
Subsequent investigation determined that both the service I
water pumps and heat excnangers were found to contain biofouling, thereby reducing their efficiency.
DURATION OF NONCOMPLIANCE:
Less than 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />.
CORRECTIVE ACTION TO REDUCE THE NONCOMPLYING DISCHARGE; An attempt was made to place a second heat exchanger into service, but were l
unsuccessful consequently load to the system was reduced to bring the noncomplying parameters back into compliance.
CORRECTIVE ACTION:
Chlorination of the system to control the growtn of biofouling organisms.
Date: August 7, 1985 l
s m
)
Initial Tolephon2 Date of Report Date: Octtber 3,1985 Occurrence: Septemoer 24,1965 REPORT OF N0NCOMPLIANCE WITH CONDITIONS OF NJPDES PERMIT NO. NJ 000 5550 REPORT NUMBER 000 S550/85/09 IDENTIFICATION OF OCCURRENCE:
Noncompliance with item 9b(3), of the permit.
CAUSE OF NONCOMPLIANCE:
Screen 1-4 at the intake structure is out of service for maintenance and port j
1-4 is closed. Consequently, the average intake velocity permit limit of j
l.0 fps was exceeded.
l l
DESCRIPTION OF NONCOMPLYING DISCHARGE:
l With only five screens and five ports in service at the intake structure, the l
condenser cooling water flow is obtained througn a smaller area, thereby, l
l increasing the intake velocity over the normal operating regime of six screens
- six ports. The average intake velocity of 1.0 fps was exceeded at ports 1, 2, and 3 with measured velocities of 1.21 fps,1.18 fps, and 1.04 fps respectively.
I t
f DURATION OF NONCOMPLIANCE:
l The duration of the noncompliance is unknown.
The noncompliance was l
identified while taking the montnly velocity measurement.
I f
CORRECTIVE ACTION TO REDUCE THE NONCOMPLYING DISCHARGE:
The intake screen at port four will be repaired and returned to service as soon as possible.
CORRECTIVE ACTION TO PREVENT RECURRENCE:
N/A.
Periodic screen maintenance must be conducted as recognized by condition 15(3) of the pennit.
l Date: October 7,1985 i
" '~
w
,---------,---.w e.--
Initial Teleph;ne Date of R:p;rt Date: _ October 16, 1985 Occurrence: Oct*De r 16,1985 s
REPORTOFNONCOMPLIANCEWITHCONDITIONSOFNJPbES PERMIT NO. NJ 000 6560 REPORT NUMBER 000 5550/85/10 IDENTIFICATION OF OCCURRENCE:
Noncompliance with item 9b(3), of the permit.
CAUSE OF NONCOMPLIANCE:
Screen 1-4 at tne intake structure is out of service for maintenance and port 1-4 is closed. Consequently, the average intake velocity permit limit of 1.0 fps was exceeded.
DESCRIPTION OF NONCOMPLYING DISCHARGE:
With only five screens and five ports in service at tne intake structure, tne condenser cooling water flow is obtained through a smaller area, thereby, increasing the intake velocity over the nonnal operating regime of six screens
- six ports. The average 'ntake velocity of 1.0 fps was exceeded at ports J, 5, and 6 with measured velocities of 1.07 fps,1.37 fps, and 1.29 fps respectively.
DURATION OF NONCOMPLIANCE:
Tne duration of the noncompliance is unknown.
Tne noncompliance was identified while taking the nonthly velocity measurement.
CORRECTIVE ACTION TO REDUCE THE NONCOMPLYING DISCHARGE:
Tne intake screen at port four will be repaired and returned to service as soon as possible.
CORRECTIVE ACTION TO PREVENT RECURRENCE:
~
l l
N/A. Periodic screen maintenance must be conducted as recognized by condition 15(3) of the permit.
Date: November 7,1985 i
=
Initial Telephone Date of Report Date:
November 26, 1985 Occurrence: November 26, 1985 REPORT OF NONCOMPLIANCE WITH CONDITIONS OF NJPDES PERMIT NO. NJ 000 5550 REPORT NUMBER 000 5550/85/11 IDENTIFICATION OF OCCURRENCE:
Noncompliance witn item 9b(3), of the permit.
CAUSE OF NONCOMPLIANCE:
Screen 1-4 at the intake structure is out of service, and port 1-4 is closed.
As a result, the average intake velocity limit of 1.0 fps was exceeded.
DESCRIPTION OF NONCOMPLYING DISCHARGE:
With only five screens and five ports.in service at the intake structure, the condenser cooling water flow is obtained through a smaller area, thereby increasing the intake velocity over the normal operating regime of six screens
- six ports. The average intake velocity limit of 1.0 fps was exceeded at ports 1 (1.32 fps) and 2 (1.38 fps).
DURATION OF NONCOMPLIANCE:
Unknown. Noncompliance was identified during routine montnly NJPDES sampling.
l l
CORRECTIVE ACTION TO REDUCE THE NONCOMPLilNG DISCHARGE; l
Intake screen 1-4 will be returned to service as soon as possible following completion of maintenance.
CORRECTIVE ACTION:
N.A.
Periodic screen maintenance must be conducted as recognized by condition i
15(3) of the permit.
l l
Date: December 9.1985 i
I
Date of Initial Telephone Repbrt Date: December 19, 1985 Occurrence: December 15, 1985 REPORT OF NONCOMPLIANCE NITH CONDITIONS OF NJPDES PERMIT NO. NJ 000 5550 REPORT NUMBER 000 5550/85/12 I
IDENTIFICATION OF DCCURRENCE:
Noncompliance with item 9b(2) of the permit.
CAUSE OF NONCOMPLIANCE:
Failure to have two (2) dilution pumps operating for more than a 15-minute period when the ambient water temperature in Barnegat Bay was less than 60.00F.
DESCRIPTION OF NONCOMPLYING DISCHARGE:
At 0247 hours0.00286 days <br />0.0686 hours <br />4.083995e-4 weeks <br />9.39835e-5 months <br /> on December 15, 1985, dilution pump 2 tripped, leaving only dilution pump 1 in service. Dilution pump 1 tripped at 0254 hours0.00294 days <br />0.0706 hours <br />4.199735e-4 weeks <br />9.6647e-5 months <br /> but was returned to service at 0257 hours0.00297 days <br />0.0714 hours <br />4.249339e-4 weeks <br />9.77885e-5 months <br />. Dilution pump 2 was returned to service at 0548 hours0.00634 days <br />0.152 hours <br />9.060847e-4 weeks <br />2.08514e-4 months <br />.
DURATION OF NONCOMPLIANCE:
Two hours and forty-six minutes (0312 - 0548 hours0.00634 days <br />0.152 hours <br />9.060847e-4 weeks <br />2.08514e-4 months <br />)
CORRECTIVE ACTION TO REDUCE NON-COMPLYING DISCHARGE:
l The sequence of dilution pump activity was related to electrical problems in the system. The electrical problems were corrected and the pumps returned to l
service.
Date: January 9,1986
Date of InTtialTelephone Report Date: January 3,1986 Occurrence: December 26,1985 REPORT OF NONCOW LIANCE WITH CONDITION 5 0F NJPDES j
PERMIT NO. NJ 000 5550 REPORT NUMBER 000 5550/85/13 4
IDENTIFICATI0W 0F OCCURRENCE:
Noncompliance with item 9b(6), of the permit.
CAUSE OF NONCOMPLIANCE:
The discharge-intake temperature difference of the cooling water of the The J
Augmented Offgas-New Radwaste System exceeded the permit limit of 270F.
temperature difference was 31.30F.
DESCRIPTION OF NONCOMPLYING DISCHARGE:
l l
There was an overload of heat in the New Radwaste System which caused the noncompliance.
DURATION OF NDNCOMPLIANCE:
Unknown.
CORRECTIVE ACTION TO REDUCE THE NONCOMPLYING DISCHARGE; l
No corrective action taken because the noncompliance was not identified until the data were collected and analyzed.
i CORRECTIVE ACTION TO PREVENT RECURRENCE:
h Use of two heat exchangers and maximum cooling water flow to minimize the j
Additionally, the inability of the Augmented Offgas-New Radwaste delta T.
I System to meet the permit limit on various occasions in the past has been discussed with the Department and it is the pemittee's understanding tnat this will be addressed in the reissuance of the permittee's NJPDES DSW Permit which is still pending with the Department. Also, taking into consideration the volume of the discharge in comparison with its combination with the intake flows of 460,000 gpm, this discharge becomes insignificant. The system, as in the past, will be operated in an effort to maintain compliance with the pemit and in a manner that will not cause damage to the equipment.
Date: January 9,1986
IdltialTelephone Date of Report Date: January 3,1986 Occurrence: December 29, 1985 REPORT OF NONCOMPLIANCE WITH CONDITIONS OF NJPDES PERMIT NO. NJ 000 5550 REPORT NUMBER 000 5550/85/14 IDENTIFICATION OF OCCURRENCE:
Noncompliance with item 9b(2), of the pennit.
CAUSE OF NONCOMPLIANCE:
Failure to have two dilution pumps operating for more than a 15-minute period when the ambient water temperature in Barnegat Bay was less than 60.00f.
DESCRIPTION OF NONCOMPLYING DISCHARGE:
At 1742 hours0.0202 days <br />0.484 hours <br />0.00288 weeks <br />6.62831e-4 months <br /> on December 29, 1985, dilution pump 1 was removed from service because of a low oil level. The back-up pump (dilution pump 3) had an oil leak and could not be started. Oil was added to dilution pump 1, and it was returned to service.
l DURATION OF NONCOMPLIANCE:
l l
One minute (1757 - 1758 hours0.0203 days <br />0.488 hours <br />0.00291 weeks <br />6.68919e-4 months <br />)
CORRECTIVE ACTION TO REDUCE THE NONCOWLYING DISCHARGE; Dilution pump 1 was returned to service as quickly as possible after adding oil.
i l
l l
I Date: January 9,1986 l
l J
r 1
- d.
1 OPU Nucioar NggI f
100 Interpace Parkway Parsippany, New Jersey 07054 201 263-6500 l
TELEX 13E482 i
Wnter's Direct Dial Number:
April 1,1986 Dr. Thomas E. Murley Regional Administrator Region I United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission i
i 631 Park Avenue King of Prussia, PA 19406 i
t Gentit.nen:
Subject:
Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Docket No. 50-219 Environmental Technical Specifications t
Annual Environmental Operating Report Enclosed are two copies of the 1985 Annual Environmental Operating Report (AEOR) for the Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station. The AEOR is submitted in accordance with Section 4.5.1 of the Oyster Creek Environmental Technical Specifications (OCETS), Appendix B to License No. DPR-16.
Should you have any questions regarding this submittal, please contact Mr. Ronald K. Lacey of our Licensing & Regulatory Affairs Staff at (201) 299-2271.
Very truly yours, P
Vice President / Director Oyster Creek 1
RCW: dis:0351f Enclosures cc: Director (17 Copies)
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulations United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555 c/o Distribution Services Branch, DDC, ADM Chief Bureau of Radiation Protection N. J. Dept. of Environmental Protection United Sierra Building
(
380 Scotch Road West Trenton, NJ 08628 h
i i
GPU Nuclear is a part of the General Public Utikties System
, _ _ ___-.