ML20198K171

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Insp Repts 50-424/86-20 & 50-425/86-11 on 860317-21. Violation Noted:Failure to Follow Procedures for Marking & Verifying Traceability for Small Component Parts Used in Mechanical Short Arrestors
ML20198K171
Person / Time
Site: Vogtle  Southern Nuclear icon.png
Issue date: 04/25/1986
From: Blake J, Vias S
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:
Shared Package
ML20198K164 List:
References
50-424-86-20, 50-425-86-11, NUDOCS 8606030355
Download: ML20198K171 (6)


See also: IR 05000424/1986020

Text

_

_ _ - _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ .

'

.

UNITED STATES

[pm af ogo,'

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

J\\

REGION 11

I

h,

101 MARIETTA STRE ET, N.W.

  • '

'g

ATL ANTA, GEORGI A 30323

%; v.....f

Report Nos.-

50-424/86-20 and 50-425/86-11

Licensee: Georgia Power Company

P. O. Box 4545

Atlanta, GA 30302

Docket Nos.:

50-424 and 50-425

License Nos.-

CPPR-108 and CPPR-109

Facility Name:

Vogtle 1 and 2

Inspection Co

a

M

h 17-21, 1986

Inspect r:

//

Y fi85

>/v S . y< V 6

Date Si ned

"'

f

// /

Approv 'd by: (

8/

G

'/ / 2 s M

f

J.

. ) flake, Section Chief

Date Signed

j

E

nAering Branch

l

fion of Reactor Safety

l

!

SUMMARY

Scope: This routine, unannounced inspection entailed 37 inspector-hours on site,

in the areas of pipe support baseplate designs using concrete expansion anchors

(IEB 79-02) and seismic analysis for as-built safety-related piping systems (IEB 79-14).

Results: One violation was identified

" Failure to Follow Procedures for the

Marking and Verification of Traceability for Small Component Parts Used in

Mechanical Short Arrestors," paragraph Se.

,

l

8606030355 860519

PDR

ADOCK 05000424

G

PDR

i_ .

.

-

.

.

REPORT DETAILS

1.

Persons Contacted

Licensee Employees

  • R. E. Conway, Senior Vice President
  • R.

H. Pinson, Vice President

  • C. Hays, Vogtle Quality Assurance (QA) Manager
  • E. D. Groover, QA Site Manager - Construction
  • G. A. McCarley, Project Compliance Coordinator
  • M. H. Googe, Project Construction Manager
  • E. J. Turner, Project Procurement and Materials Manager
  • R. J. Gregory, Construction Engineer

Other licensee employees contacted included construction craftsmen,

engineers, technicians, mechanics, warehouse personnel,

and

office

personnel.

Other Organization

  • J. E. Miller, General QA/QC Manager - Pullman Powar Products (PPP)
  • B. L. Edwards, Construction Manager - PPP

?

NRC Resident Inspectors

  • H.

Livermore, Senior Resident Inspector - Construction

J. Rogge, Senior Resident Inspector - Operations

R. Schepens, Resident Inspector - Operations

  • Attended exit interview

2.

Exit Interview

The inspection scope and findings were summarized on March 21, 1986, with

those persons indicated in paragraph above.

The inspector described the

areas inspected and discussed in detail the inspection finding listed below.

No dissenting comments were received from the licensee.

(0 pen) Violation 50-424/86-20-01 and 50-425/86-11-01, " Failure to Follow

Procedures for the Marking and Verification of Traceability for Small

Component Parts Used in Mechanical Shock Arrestors," paragraph 5.e.

The licensee did not identify as proprietary any of the materials provided

to or reviewed by the inspector during this inspection.

,

.

2

3.

Licensee Action on Previous Enforcement Matters

(Closed) Unresolved Item 50-424/86-10-01 and 50-425/86-05-01, " Traceability

of Components for Mechanical Shock Arrestors", paragraph 5.e.

(0 pen) Violation 50-425/85-62-01, " Improper Storage of Piping Materials,"

paragraph 5.d.

(The inspector identified an additional example of this

violation. The licensee stated they would address this additional example

in their response to this violation.)

4.

Unresolved Items

Unresolved items were not identified during the inspection.

5.

Safety-Related Pipe Supports and Restraints Systems (50090, 25528, 25529)

a.

Observation of Work and Work Activities

The inspector selected the following four hangers / supports in the area

of dynamic pipe supports and components supports structures that had

i

been QC final

inspected.

Documentation for the installation,

inspection and design were reviewed; the hangers were reinspected with

the assistance of QA/QC inspectors; and the results discussed with the

QA/QC inspectors to determine the effectiveness of the hanger program.

Hanger No.

System

Type

V)-1301-102-H641

Pipe strap with lugs

V1-1301-138-H003

Constant spring Size #2

VI-1301-108-H001

Constant spring Size #9

V1-1204-007-H010

Installed PSA #1 snubber

The above hangers were reinspected against their detail drawings for

configuration, identification, fastener / anchor installation, clear-

ances, member size, welds, and damage / protection.

In general, the

hangers were installed in accordance with design documents with the

exception of the items identified by the inspector listed below.

l

~ The inspector observed that for V1-1301-138-H003 and V1-1301-108-H001,

the springs had not been set at this time and therefore there was no

tension on the springs.

i

Within the areas examined, no violations or deviations were identified.

b.

Review of QC Documentation and Records

The inspector selected the following sample of four hanger / support QC

documentation packages in the area of dynamic pipe support and

component support structures that had been QC final inspected and final

QA reviewed.

I

L

J

.

.-

-.

_

-_-_

.

-.

.

__

_.

-

.

3

Hanger No.

Type

Comment / Discrepancy

V1-1301-015-H004

PSA #10 snubber

None

i

VI-1203-065-H003

PSA #h snubber

None

!

VI-1301-102-H641

Strap / Lugs

None

Within the areas examined, no violations or deviations ~were identified,

l

c.

The inspector observed in the Pre-Op Testing Shop, the functionally

testing of mechanical snubbers.

The test observed was the " Tension

t

Functionally Test" for a Anchor-Darling AD-15 snubber for hanger

.

l

V1-1301-198-H001. The test procedure used was GPC Procedure 28310-C

R/2. While inspecting the storage of the snubbers in this area, it was

cbserved that various small component parts for the snubbers had no

i

heat numbers, serial

numbers or other traceable markings.

This was

brought to the attention of both the licensee and a QA/QC inspector

4

f rom PPP. This concern is addressed in further detail in paragraph

5.e.

.

d.

The inspector toured the main warehouse and temporary storage area for

snubbers, in the pre-op testing area for snubbers. During tSe tour of

the main warehouse, it was noted that Pacific-Scientific snubbers

V2-1305-057-H003(2), and V2-1201-049-H023 were not being stored in

1

accordance with ANSI standards, in that ANSI N45.2.2-1972, Package,

Shipping, Receiving, Storage and Handling of Items for Nuclear Power

Plants, paragraph 6.3.2, requires that ". . . items stacked for storage

be arranged so that racks, cribbing or crates are bearing the full

weight without distortion of the item." The inspector observed that a

crate of three Pacific-Scientific PSA-35 snubbers were placed on top of

three uncrated PSA-35 snubbers.

This is contrary to GPC Procedure

GD-A-30 " Receipt, Receipt inspection, Storage and Handling," paragraph

8.6, which states " arrange items stacked for storage so racks, cribbing

'

or crates are bearing the full weight without distorting the item."

,

This failure tc protect the snubbers, noted above, is identified as

t

!

another example of violation reported in NRC Report No. 50-424/85-62;

Item No. 50-424/85-62-01, " Improper Storage of Piping Materials."

The inspector discussed the above matter with the licensee.

The

i

licensee indicated that they would address the issue of improper

storage of the snubbers with the response to violation 50-424/85-62-01,

" Improper Storage of Piping Materials."

e.

As identified in NRC Inspection Report 50-424/86-10 and 50-425/86-05,

this inspector noted that various component parts for mechanical

snubbers did not have any identification numbers, heat numbers, serial

4

numbers, or manufacturer markings t'o de able to ascertain traceability

'

of the components, and opened unresolved items 50-424/86-10-01 and

50-425/86-05-01, " Traceability of Components for Mechanical Shock

!

Arrestors."

!

,

.- . -

- . _ . -..

. _ - _ . - -

. , _ .

. - . _ _ . . . - _ _ - - _ _ - , , - - . . - , - _ _ - _ - - _ - . . - . _ ,

'

.

4

During this follow-up inspection of mechanical snubbers, in the Pre-Op

Testing Area, Main Warehouse, and the Pre-Fab Shop, this inspector was

looking for the traceability of small component parts used in the

fabrication and installation of the mechanical snubbers. In particular

the snubbers' load pins and studs, bolts, nuts, and hardened washers.

Many examples of the components in question, were identified by this

inspector as not having any identifying markings on the components.

The findings were identified in all the three storage areas noted above

and identified to the licensee.

As required by Pullman Power Products (PPP), SI-64, " Site Instruction

for Marking of Pipe Supports", Section 5.1, states, " Materials which

are considered small products bolting material (studs, nuts and bolts

2" nominal diameter and less)

and materials supplied with a

...

l

certificate of compliance without marking identifying the items to the

!

manufacturer must be marked as required in section 6.1".

Section 6.1

states, " Materials not marked individually by the manufacturer are to

be marked as follows:

Bergen Paterson

-

NF-BP1

Pacific Scientific -

PS1

Anchor / Darling

-

AD1

t

Also, PPP procedure VIII-1, " Identification of Materials, Parts &

Components", Section 5.1,

states, " Markings Required by the Codes,

Specifications and Procedures Referenced in Paragraph 3.0 Shall be

Verified During the Receipt Inspection Required by Project Procedure

X-5, Field Receiving Inspection."

During the inspection of hardened washers, this inspector noted that

four different sizes were being utilized in the torquing process of

mechanical snubbers in the Pre-Fab Shop.

The inspector noted to the

licensee that the smallest of the four washers had no identi fying

markings and did not fit in the parameters as stated in PPP Procedure

VIII-1, " Identification of Materials, Parts & Components," Sect on 5.2,

i

which states "The identification of hardened washers shall be verified

by color of the washer and the sound it emanates when dropped on a hard

surface. .The color hardened washers is black or dark gray (from the

heat treatment to improve physical properties). The sound is resonant

versus the muted sound of standard unhardened washers."

Upon further investigation and review, unresolved item 50-424/86-10-01

and 50-425/86-05-01, " Traceability of Components for Mechanical Shock

Arrestors", is being closed as an unresolved and opened as violation.

The discrepancies in the use of small components in the installation

and fabrication of mechanical snubbe

were not being followed as noted

a

above and is contrary to the proct Jures as noted, and as required by

Criterion V of Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 50, " Instructions, Procedures

and Drawings," and is identified as violation 50-424/86-20-01 and

_____ ______ _

'

.

5

50-425/86-11-01, " Failure to Follow Procedures for the Marking and

Verification of Traceability for Small Component Parts used in

Mechanical Shock Arrestors."

6.

Licensee Identified Items

(Closed) Item 424, 425/84-54, " Potential Deficiency on Pacific-Scientific

PSA-1 and PSA-3 Shock Arrestors" (10 CFR 50.55(e)).

The final report was

submitted on July 3, 1984. The report has been reviewed and determined to

be acceptable.

The inspector held discussions with responsible licensee

representatives, reviewed supporting documentation and correspondence to

verify that the corrective actions identified in the report have been

completed.