ML20196H492
| ML20196H492 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | South Texas  |
| Issue date: | 01/04/1988 |
| From: | Calvo J Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Miraglia F, Murley T, Rehm T Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FOR OPERATIONS (EDO) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20147H733 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8803110056 | |
| Download: ML20196H492 (21) | |
Text
__ __
..s .4 m R iCo,64 649 I
i!,
/ \'
a UNITap Stares NUCt. EAR REGULATORY COMMIS$10N memnerow, e. s. sense .
y January 4,1968
(,% . . .
FIFORANDUM FOR: Thomas A. Rehm, Assistant for Operations Office of the: Executive Director for Operations Thtwas E. Murleyg Director Offfet of Nuclear Peactor Regulation .
Frank J. Miragits. Associate Director i for' Pro,iects .
Offfee of Nuclear Reactor Pegulation Dennis Mi, Crutchfield. Director i Divisionl of Reactort Projects . !!!, !Y, Y and Special Projec.ts Office of Nuclear Peactor Regulation FROM: Jose A. Caliro, Director i Project Directoratat- IV '
Division:of Reactor: Projects ..!!!.
IV, Y and Special Projects Office of Nuclear Reactor. Regulation.
)
SUBJECT:
i 50U114 TEXAstPROJECT:($TP) Pt.AN FOR EVALUATION +
AND RISCLLITf0N10' AtttGATIONS PR0ffDED BY THf ,
GOVTPM'tMT ACCOUNTABILITY.PP0 JECT;(GAP)i -
,. t The plan for' in is presented the evaluation Enclosure .1.and. resolution of STP allegations provided by EAP $
2.
The WPC Safety Significance Assessment feari (55AT) (Enclosure 2) has casoleted i a preliminary review of the ellegations and associated materf alt at #AP offices in Washington, D.C., and has complied, summarfred, and cateocrfred them! tiy disef p1fne or toples (see Endlesure 4). It is importart.to note that the,55AT had difficulty during its review in assessing the safety signtficance of many of the allegations due to the laclof specificity and detail of the identifica-tinn nf a particular cos9enent or system prcvided by the allegers (referred to by GAP as concerned individuals - Cis).
Beesuse of the poneral lack of specificity of the allegations, it is imperative that the 55AT contact the allegers ard determine if they can identify locations or components that exhibit the conditions that they have a concern over at STP.,
This will e actittate the 5 SAT subsequent inspection to substantiate the concerns er deterutne that the concern has been satisfactorily corrected. If an alleger.
cannot be contacted nr if the' contact.yfelds no additional specif.fc information.
to focus the.taspection on a particular area or component, the individual.
allegation will'be dispositioned as unsubstantf ated and the general subject matter will be pursued further only if other related allegations provide some basis to assume'that there is validity to the concern.:
8803110056 080229 PDR ADOCK 05000498 i p PDR
.. $ a 2
The 5 sat wrote a brief description of each allegation reviewed. We feel that the subject metter.used :in some of the allegation descriptions atqht. reveal the identity of the 411eger.: Thus, the GAP allepatior descriptions prepared by 5 SAT must remain confidential until suchia time that the need for the confiden-tiality'of the allegers .is no longer required..
Enclosure 5 lists the 10 primaryjallegetions that the 55AT will investigate at STP. Enclosure 6 lists the secondary allegatices that.will also be coesidered along withithe primary 4.11egations due. to their strilarities to the prtNry allegations. 2 The preposed $$AT inspection team (Enclosure 7) are the same iedividuals that -
perforced the: initial review, evaluation. and screening of the allegations.
Given the time remaining. to prepare, for the. inspection and the general -
non-specific reture of the allegations, the utilization of these experienced . '
reviewers or 1.nspection team neebers will greatly. facilitate. the effort.
8AP has been contacted and civen the primary and secondary allegation lists to '
allow than to contact the appropriate ellegers.and any others that ney provide ,
any additional information concernine the allegations selected for inspection, cepending on the results of GAP contact with the a11 agers, the proposed.tenta-tive scheduleifor the inspectinn effort will cassenca during the wed of January u,1984. _g thould you have any questions regarding these netters, please contact re at X2740 i
g M ,' 8 [c W l Jose A. Calva. Director- 5 Project Directorate
- IV ' /
Divisioe ef Reacter Projects - !!!, ,
1 IV, andispecial Projects Office of NucleariReactor Reguistion .
ec w/ enclosures:
- SSAT Members
' V. Stello, EDO W. Parler, 00C J. Snierek, NftA i F. partin, RIV W. Pussell, R1 W. Johnston, RI e j L. Shao, NRR*.!..~
- J. Roe, NRR
- j J. Partlow, NRR T'
- t. Hayes. 0! I i W. Briggs, MC
.K. Smith, CriC:
l 1
J. Lieberwan. 0E '
R. Brady, NRRI
- T. Martin, ED0 l S. r.arde ,AAPI y ;
- R. Condit, GAP 1
ns -
9 frelnsure 1 SOUTH TEXA!t:PP0 JECT ALLEGATIONS DEVIEW SAFETY Sf#ltfFTcAPCE ASSESSMENT STATUS REPORT
. _. 1. . SACKGR00#0 f11reet interaction between MC staff and The Govertee of the litigation arers. began on November 19.!1987.
in the Officalof the Executive Director of ftperat. fens (EDO),:Bethesde. .A meet with 4 Thomas Ai Rehm leading the NRCistaff. representatives and tillie P.
8 rde leading:the GAP! representatives.. The backdrep for this meeting wes' the decision by the US Ofstrfet Court dated October 27 1067. The Court.
had ruled to deny enforcement of a NPC subpoena on Ms. Garde because of the possibility of 'abrideement of constituticeally protected associational rights.*i in addition, the court stated that intrusion on associational rights sust.be car,efully and conscienttout y?
explored before resort may be had to the court!s process." . ..
)
Priorite the meeting of November .19,1967, agreement had been reached between the DO ind Ms. Garde on vthe sein elements of a process:that would provide the NRC ttaff limited accass to information which mioht.be of '.
relavance ir the forthcoming licensing doctstens regarding South Texas hp Project.: rensegeently on Nevenber 19.1987.: RRC staff reviewers were -
- permitted to sea brief surmaries of the allegations in the possession of GAP.
An attempt'was made by the techcical experts present to assess the safety signiffcancelof the allegations.. Unfortunately, the iPformation i [
made available to the staff was to laclLing in specificity that no conclu- ' ..{
sfons on safety siFnificance ceutd be reached. t In order for the Nef staff to gain access to more detailed information.. arrangements wre agreed upon for the NRC technical sta*f ta visit the AAP offices. in Washington. 0.C. .
The protocol for tf4 NRC staff's work at the' TAP offices wat agreed upon.
to protect. to SAP's satisfaction, the identity of individuals who.have l made the allegationss. The' NRC staff has completed its preliminary review of the information made available.by GAP as described below within the framework of agreements reached with GAP thus far. In addition, it is understood that GAP has previded the Office of investigations (01) alleoe-
- tions of harassment and intimidation and wrongdoing. To assure that all-
- CAP identified allegations are reviewed and evaluated, the Rtc Safety i $tentfiesnee Assessment Team ($ SAT). which was assembled to per' ann the initial reviewi of GAP's records, will forward to f17 all allegatioes that6 i
they reviewed and categorfred as harassrent and: intimidation er wrongdoing, j
,,,----,e, ,n.,. _ , , . , - - - - - , , , - - - , _ , , , - - - , -. ,.,,w.ww,, ---r
i .c .- .
2 P. TMITIAL kFC STAFF REVIEW M AllErATIONS An NRC team was assembled, referrett hereleafter as the .55AT isefety sientftcance assessment team). to review 4AP records of interviews.with aliegers (referred by GAP as concerned, individuals (Cis)) ard individual allegations that FAP enumerated from the Interviews. Enclosured Ortsents the NRC $$AT participants as rell. as the disciplines that were involved in this ir,1tf al review, of GAP's allegetions doeur.entation.: As agreedi F9C SSAT reviewed GAP's records at AAP's offices: in Washing *.on D.C. These -
recores consisted of audio tapes of snost of the interviews. conducted by a GP consultant with! the C!s, the consultant hand-written text extrapolated from the tapes, and: allegation. data sheets that contained each allegatfon's :
unique alpha-numeric code and a brief description of the concern. .
The UP tonsultant's hand writtet text was assembled in numbered file 2 which contained reference materials related to allegations. There are ..
)
approximately 30 filesiwith varying quantitfes of text and. referecce - I esterials and two-3 ring bf.-4ers contatefne thet S76 individual r11egation data sheets. GAP has;cataaortred the ellegattens into,the following areas:. safety-related; intimidationi and harassment, wrongdoing,i and non, s afety-reirated.
tion of allegatfonsEnclosure 3 presents the categorization and des,1gna-used by AAP. l i
.s 1 The Pec initial screeninoiwas performed. by NRC ST.AT members with expertise . I fr particular areas of cercornt mechanical enetreertag, electrical l engineering, civi3/structeral engineertn!1,1 Ovality Assurance and. Control. '
and managerientilincludingi the safety *related aspects derived from harassment 2
, and intimidation,; and wroegdoing concernsh
, g i
The GAP consultant was available to the: team to explain where:and how - '
i the records were kept and assembled end to answer any;questicos for the . .;
! team.
SSAT meebers reviewed each allegation, its associated. f aterview text and reference retarial 1 file in their area nF expertise. . Screenfrg also .
i included Itstening to selected audio tapes.to verify thei accuracy of the ;
written text extrapelated free them. i The results of .the S$AT review and initial screening were docurented and identified by allegatfoe numbert Each SSAT meeber wrote.a brie' description of each sllegatien as identified by GAP's consultant ard indicated'if the concern appeared to be safety-related ne non safety related.
Also, $$AT membe-s noted if other disciplines e.ay be involved with a particular al'fegation and whether the CI needs to be contacted for additional infomation.-
e :
Generally, the $5AT's initial screening detemined that a large ma.fority i of the alleeations lacked specificity in identifyine a partfeular location, component, or systes about, which the CI was concemed, i The individual $5AT rember's data was .sohined and recategorfre into !
allepatton aroupsti Mecharicalt Flectrical; Civf1/strveturait GA/QC; '
Parassment and intimidation; Wrongdoing; NPC Region IV; and.Manasement
?
3 issees.! Each category has several subsets that was used to specify nere closely 6 tesues that each allegation appears to be addressing. i EncInsure 4 identifies the allopation groups used by the.NRC SSAT.
- 3. CCHP!LtWG Al.Ltr,ATION DATA A
bybrief AAP. summary was prepared for each allegation that wes.made avatieble
- - Three filles et,ntaipirg approxiettely 50 allegations.have been withheld
. alleger by GAP due to conf.identiality, concerns on the part of the. 1 The allegation suuraries 'have been entered into a. computerized data base along with the SSAt's preliminary cateportration of the safety significance of the a,11egation, the groupins of commoni er toimilar: 411egations, and 1 determination whether the allegert must.be f.ontacted to provide specific inferration needed by ithe SSA7. to determine the safety significance of the allagatter..
GAP's initte) categertration of thete allegations listed dvD11catticoncerns under different review disciplines. Because of this6 the 65AT inittelly had to consfder approrfartely 700. concerns. .When these, duplications were .
reconciled there were US concerns. representing the.same number of allegations, identified try #AP. Of these,159 c' oecerns are variations ef 4 1 an initial concern relatine additional facets of the criginal. concern such -
as to or possible caused docurentation by the inittelproblems concern.ior . intimidation or harassment related ;
t' The remaining concerns have been combined.inte groups with. similar ccreerns- .f f allefations) and will'he reviewed together to assure that the magnitude.
of each issue is recoonized end that.coeren concerns are detected. Also, the groupfee. nf the concerrise will' ensure a certain degree of protection of the identity of allegers.' In addit 46n.. AAP will advise whether ,the allegation.= withheld from Mpc review.because.of reasons of confidentiality or because they involved members of the.NRC staff. are covered by the establin,ed MRC 55AT alleoation groups.:
grouping schere is shown in Enclosure 4 The Nec alleeation (concern) j The S$AT's primary effert will be expended on these allegations that are identified'as safety-related concerns. These issues will:be initially i 1 exemined to determined whether they could affect criticality or pewer
! ascension either because these operatices could represent unacceptable safety risks due to the alleger's concerns or because the allegation
- would be uninspectable after the plant starta up. Following this, the most safety detail significant alterations will be identified and reviewed in by the 55AT.
Pecause there is very little. specificity included in the GAP allegatiens,
- it is imperative that the 5 SAT contact the.allecces and ask them tn Mentify specific locatines.esystems, or components that exhibit the cen-dittrrs that they allege to erf st at South Texas Pro.'ect. so that the staff i can substantiate satisfactorily the* alfegers corrected. - concer", or concitade that the concern has been 4
4 . :..w.c i l l
4 4 Att trATIONS SEl.ECTED FDP $77E IMSPECTIONS .
Enclosure 5 lists the 10 primary allegations that the 55AT will investicate at South Texas'. Enclosure 6 lists the secondary allegations that will also !
be considered along with these primary allegattens dun to their similarities to the prin ry allegation.. 3 Out of the 5761 GAP allecations enumerated.. ocly those.16 concerns identified in Enclosure 6:as "spec.ific"!can be tied to a specific location,'Fystem. or compot:ent.. rhe' rest refer. only in general terms to :
ltems of concern.' It is therefore frporative that the 11AT centact.the i '
411egers in the remaining concerns to ebtain enough specific information i -I to conduct a detailed revfew6 Some of the gap's altecers will require l that a confidentf ality agreement be completed by NRC before they.afree to
- deal with.us. p' If an alleger cannot be contacted er if the contact yields no additioest 1 i sper.ific informationi to focus the tinvestigation ce a par.ticular system, l corponent! or locattan, the Individual allegation will.-be dispositioned as l unsubstantiated and the general subject matter will be pursued further l only if other related allegations provide some basis to assume that there.
is validity to the concern. .
3' in additibn to the $$AT'inspectice:en site, other sources of information . 5i such as Wegionel irspection reports pertaining to the;resolutfor of South. }
Texas Pro.iect allegations,' MIR inspec.tions. data and safety evaluation reports, the 11censee's.5AFETEAM records, sed,other decismentation that- '4 currently;esists will be reviewed to determine v+ ether they. provide aey addf tienal information related to an alleger's concern. These supplemental 1S investigations vill not: focus explicitly on an individual alleiwr's-corcern, they will also, include.other unrelsted issuas such. that -the ;
alleger's identity willt be protected,i if ree.ufred, c 2
- 5. !!AT thsptCT!0M'Roi.E.
The SSAT will inspect the selected. GAP a11epations et the south Taras Project (STP) site, the $$AT consists of experts in construction and inspection activitfes in nuclear power plants. The proposed organization
, o* the NRC inspection teen, as well as the . inspectors names and their t
! assigns;ents are preserteti in Enclosure 7 The staff selected for the inspection team.are the same individuals that performed the.initiet review, evaluation, and screening of the allegatfens. Alven the time remaining to prepare for the inspectior and the general non-specific l nature of the allegations, the use of these experienced reviewers as l inspection team:mentiers will greatly facilitate the effort.
! A major concernto' the allegation review.and inspection process is the t
protection of the confidentiality of the.alle9ers (concerned individuals).
Arrangements will be made to contact the allegers by gap. If recuired, the NRC will draw-up any confidentiality.agreseemts with the allegers.
e
,,_,e..
' . . s. c -.i.=-==
l l
j )
in addition, the inspection plan vila consider combinire other related or unrsisted conceres with the selected MP alle substance of the allegations does. net reveal.gations to ensure that the i reovesting confidentiality. the idertity of these allegers - '
A detailed inspection plan will be prepared by the 55AT leader and its deputy with assistancedrom ithe team members. Inspector guidance will be established: prior to the coseencement of the inspection to assure consis-tency:in the inspection process. Emphasis willibe placed en root cause
'" determinatices'of any substantiatet ellegationsaincluding the.ident.ifica.
1
- - tien of any geceric imp 1tcat. fens. i Ta'further facilitate the selected '
allegation resolution procesa. the 15AT will utiltre available Region IV a inspection repcrts on disposition of allegations, as well as ary.nR .-
inspection reports and safety evaluation reports for FTP, 7~
The'fo11cwing tentat;1ve schedule is proposed for this irspection. effort: .I
^
December 28 :19P7 f- January 1.1988 -
) - Initial planning i
- Selection of 4AP allegations te be inspected -
- Selection of inspection teert members .
1
- Present ddentified allegations to be inspected:to GAP
- (Allithe above actions have been ceppleted) ]
- 4. ,
January 4 - P 1988 i g
- Detailed inspect.fon planning and inspector guidance preparation
, - Arrangements with GAP'to contact allegers January 11 - 15. 198E '
.4,
. .a
- Interview allagere if MC is successful in arranging interviews. 2" threugh SAP ,
- Tentative start of onsite lespection depending on number of allegerst to be intervfewed : .
- l
- January 18 - 22, 1988'
- Onsite inspection of selected allegations; j
- January 75 - 76, 1988
- Summary of allegation inspectica results . t j '
January 25 - February.3. 1988'.
j - A11epetion inspection repnrt preparation i Februrry 1 6 1988 i
- Tentative Cnerission briefing on full power license for STp L' nit 1 i
4
. ~ .. w 4 ..~w ERCIOff>Pt ?'
SOUTM_ TEXAS PPNECT ALLEGATIONS t WPC SAFETT SIGNIFICANCE ASSESSMENT TIAM (51ATS PFMRfRS INVet VED IM THE INITIAL REYTFW 0F GAP RECORDS MO9ER ORGANT7ATICF DISCfPLINE Paul O'Connor PC-Fv/NRRi 1
Project. Panager: ,'
Edward Teslinson s
- PO-IV/NRRt Elect. Irst. 4 Misc. ;
JaiPajan EE N/NRR ! Mechanica14 _.
Pasuald Lipinski ESA8/NRR ;
Civil /$tructurel ,
Hansrej Ashar .
E588/PR7 -
Civil /Structwn1- -
Jarve Durr Regionil QA/QC -
Petrick Milano CE 04/CC
- 7. ,
Richard Carrets LQA81NRP. >
N/QC 'p1 {
George .lohnscri EMS /NRR 1 g.
Weldinge Jose ,Calvoi PD.!Y/htR I -
Pro,iect Directer-M'
, '.9 i
x;
. . aes
. . . . . .j i
.o D Y 1 t
.: :e
-. .:4 .y, 1
1
1 i
1 Enclosure 3 SOUTH TEMAS PR(UECT ALLEGAT10tr5 .
i GAP ALLEGATION CATEGDRIZATI0If Als Of51GMATI006 '
SECTION*LI.[' DISCIPLIK CAlfGORY ALLEGATION
~
- KLATER ALLEGATIONS
! - Safety blated A- Piping /Nech/ inst a.' 'Herdsere i
0001 -9999** .1, .2, S- Electrical. - . -
.3, etc.
II - Intimid/Marass. C-Civil / Structural g D- $NAC b. Dec./ Drugs.
III - idrongdoing E- Engr / Design c. Insp./ Testing )
F- Procurement /Purchas - .. ..- .-
i IV'- Non-Safety'Rel.
< 1 G- Equipseet gaia11f. d. Other l H- Fire Protectlie ~
1- 94/gCA-5/ Systems ,
.. 'Gespletion._
J- Welding * ' .:
K- Safety /socierity I.P. ;
L- IE.....,....... ... i i , e M- Seismic & Environment 61 EXAprLEr s
! N- Generic (all disc) 0- Personnel '
P "r; ut I A a'- 0001= Safety related/ Piping /haresare i,
Q- Tralaing specific allegation num6er
- J R- amt - . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
j 5- safeteae T- fBASCO .
.t l U- isLAP 1 A b - 8001.1 (same), subset documentation v- 5.C & rm ~ ~
- j. . ._ . . . . . . _ . . _ _ _ _ . . . . . .
i M- ANI . . .
X- qualification af -!'
Persammel !
! Y- Bechtel .
[
Z- Docuseet Control ' .
- Note
! NRC allegationdata a computerized numbers base. use Arabic numbers I through 4 rather than Rossa numerals to facilitate use of
- Allegation numbers are cross referenced te actuel GAP allegation stumber.
4 .
y * , . w .m. u u 2 d ' $ . 4;$ .n.
, - . .**d' ~*
i
= _ _ _
t -
Enclosure 4 50tfTH TEXA5 PROJECT AL.L.tGATIONSS !
NRC 55AT ALLEGATION GROUPS -
A. MECHANICAL AND P!P!NG
- 1. P! PING I A. . Pfpei C. ConfifNration:
- 8. Hydro i D. Chlor < de Contamination
- 2. VALVES A. Limitorque C. Missing
,. , B. Ipat411ation _. . . . . . . - .
3.
i MTERIALS . A. Traceabd11ty -
- 5. Compatabil'1ty *
- 4. HVAC A. Procerament .
C. Fabrication 8 Installation ,
D. Testing. ,
- 5. SESIMIC QUALIFICATION 3 -l '
- 6. FASTEMERS A. Counterfett/ Foreign '
- 7. WELDING *. A. Weld Rod :
t s.
C. idelder ID i Qualifications-i D. .Traceatt11ty '
-4
- 0. OTHER. .-
i
-Q
- 8. ELECTRICAL .g
- 1. SPLICts i 9 A. Rayches i i
- 2. CAki AND CONDUIT j
- 3. IM5TRulENTATION i ..
- 4. EWIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION 1
- 0. OTHER -
. = **
P h
.n 2 -
2 C CIVIU$TRUCTURAL ,
- 1. CONCRETE
- 2. SOILS
- 3. C0ATINGS
- 0. OTHER
- 0. QA/QC - .-- - - - - - - - - -
~ *
\
- 1. DESIGN CONTROL
- 2. PROCUREMENT ..
- 3. DOCUMENT: CONTROL' ,
4 QC INSPECTION * .
A. - Inspection Records '
- 8. t Travellers
. C. t Hold Point i 0, 1 Authorized Nuclear Inspector-.
-j-E. I NCRs
- 5. Astu!LT vs DE5100t y
! 6.
l SYSTEM TURM0VEA i ('
- 7. FSAR/ SPECIFICATIONS 3
l *
- 8. PROCEDURES .
J
! 0. OTHER - ~
E.
HARRASSMENT & INTIN!OATION -(SAFETY RELATED !$$UE5 ONLY)
F.
WRONG DOING (SAFETY RELATED !$5 DES ONLY)
G. NRC H. MANAGENENT t
- 1. NLM
- 2. . SECNTEL
- 3. . ESASCO-
- 4. INTERMECH~
- 5. PERSONNEL PRACTICES .
- 5. TRAINING -
- 7. SAFETEAM '
O. OTHER
- 0. OTHER i e
. ., e -
f factosure 5 50UTN'TUA5 PROJfCT ALLEMTf0NS
'~
PRIMARY Af.LF.4Af tt*5 SELECTED FOR !F?PfCT!0F I.
Mechanicel joints.
Pfptng 1Aa-0560 'Cf eencerned with the cualpy of stpe
!!. Velves - Wa-0563 - CI coceerned that many. valves are. installed -
m .. .
bacheards. - -
!!!. HVAC - tJa-0354 ' C1 concerned with adetvecy of NVAC welds.
k IV.
Fastenersat installed - 1Fe-0062 STP.; - C1 concerned that counterfeit fasteners are V.
Welding - 10a 0130 - CI concerned with the. adequacy /qualf ty of wid .
, rtH8 used at STP.
VI.
Electrical Cable adequacy of Rayckee / Instrumentation splices at STP. - 1Aa-0119 - CI concerned with the :
VII. A) Civ11/Structura11C4 0638 ..CI concerned with concrete drilling through reber.
- 2) 1Ca-04941-butidingL C! concerned with crack in bottta of fuel.handline s I
.j ,
i VI!!. Coatings .14a-0059 - C! concerned.with coatings used on the .?
- \
structures and equfpment. 4 - '
i IX. QA/0C - if a-0 Ant.1 - C1 concerned with *as built." vs. "as designed
- configurations of valves. ; -
1 WRC/Recion TV - Va-0554 - CI called WPC several times cencerning certair problems and had no return response.
)
l 4
,4 i
N. r..
1 d
8 i
1
Enclosure 6 50tmbtFIAS PROJECT ALLEGATIONS SECONDARY. ALLFcATIONS CATEG0RY - MECHANICAL /PfPika Allegation No.
fletteristion.
1Aa 0560 Dentcient PfpeiJoints .
1Aa-0162 '"' - -
18a-0307 Pipe to Tank Connections 1Eg 0754 Filmer Screensi te M555 Loop > foecific (sp.) -
1Pa 0279 Insta11atfee of Pumps, Valves, Jnstruments 1Ea-0556 Insta11stice of Purps, Valves Jnstrwerts 18a 3ta Insta11atinn of Pumps . Valves,, Jnstrunents -
1Ea-0556 Ste m Generator installation.(sp.)
1Ea-0432 Instellation of Pum Pipe Peterialselsp.ps,). V41ves, Jnstrwent:
VALVEK 1Aa 0563 -~t Yalte installation 1Aa-0081~
Ma-0305.1 Valve Paintenance.f s(p.),see Ifp 0754 above) 1Aa-0445 Valw Installation -
Valw testa 11ation
.. i al MAffPIALS (Covered under other categorfes)
- l PVaC 1Ca-0046.1 104 0109 Puctwerk Welds -
10s-0117 HYAG f esta11ations .
10a-0296 HVActMaterial Traceshtlity 10a-0337 kVAC. Installations i Ih-0356 HVAC. 5eal Material' /sp. )
HVAC Welefs 104 0450 .,'. HVAC. Desper Isp.1 10a-0504 -
HVAC Material l 1Ab-0714 .. .', NYAC !nstellation j W.c-0619 !
free.1Da-OtM ) -
i * !
i l
i i
e
.~s .s 2
FA%TEMER$
111egatinet Po. Deleription 1Aa-0026 1Fa-0044 Bolts Installation i Bolt Traceab11f ty
, 1Fa-C084 Polt Traceabiltity
' ' ~ ~ ~ "
Ita-0387 '
Polt Installation
'Fa 00 H Bolt. Traceabiltity .
- ,; p 1Fa-00t2 11a 00t2 ' soht Traceability (sp )
Bolt Treceability '
lYa-0087 Rolt Traceability 1Aa 0132 1Fa-0164 Bolt Traceabil.ity IFa-0488.1 Bolt Traceahtiity Bolt. Traceability WELDING '
IJa-0104 Weld Rod Traceability IJa-130 Weld Rod .freccebility 17t 0571 1 Welders -
1Ja.0687.1 Welders ($p.) ~
106-01?O Welders 1.la 01*? Welders - 1 10a.0354.2 Welders -
1Jb-0053 Welders ; 3 h*t 0064 Weld Rod Traceability *
(tirtp1 cal, fAf COMPONENT 5' b
1Ba-0175 Cable Installations ita-0449 Cable Insta11stiers 154 0008 Cable Inst.allations 15a 0409 Cable Installations 1Aa-0126 Cable Insta11stiens i i
1Ea-0465 Incere* Instrumentation '
!hielding for Panels.(sp.)
' Instrument Yalves (sp.).
Flew Transmitter Installation (sp.)
m _-
Civ!L/STDUCTUWAL --
Ita Of38 Concrete Prilline 1Ca-0494 1Cc-0114 Concrete Settlements (sp.)
Fill-216 0121.1 Fill'
3 (PATINGS Allecation No.
_ Otter 1Dtior '
1Ga 0059 Coating Traceability / Application (sp.)
SA/.S$
tid-0040 - -
1T6 0094 Conffguretton Control Ifa-0601.1 Cor. figuration Control 1Eb-0612 Configuration Control -
t!b-0705 Conf.ipuration Contro1 lib 0751 fonMguratton fontrol ConM evration Control IDb-CM0 -
pecords 164-314 IEb 159 $. A. Inspectfon .
1Eb-0159.2 Pipe W ipipestraint Inspection 1Ja-0254 Pipe Wtp>Restreint Inspectfen 1Eb 061? FVAC Weld rinspection .
1Ab-0174 Support Installation Inspection tCb-0638.1 MVAC Instellation Inspection .
Concrete Drilling Inspectfer -.
NRC/r.fV S
1!d-0267.1 :
1Aa-0554 ConfidentialIt '
tis-0555 Deficiencies (y:sp.)
Deficienctes (sp.1
- 9 e
i 2.
.2.:..:
..1L. iy I
i i
_ _ _ _ _ . _ . . _ _ _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ' ' ~
t +
~
t E a z
. 3 2 x
~t 1 -
I 8 -
a 5 -
I - gI :..
.- M) I m _-
, , . . .. . -- =
J 7 _
y . ,
O a ^ ik '
0 si g I' g" a
- 2,v-g'8 mg e .
5 -
- g~% 2 gn t
^
e gg-j
,,-g t I 2
- t. l gg g e e y : ma i sx 2.
s y t; '
- .s =;
n s .
(
'E :
is ie 0; .- min a s' d d .
aJ< d a a in's j
w - -
s ig
_ i .1
" f ..y, W g ',r. rs, 1
4 e .
A !s s '. - ,,': .
-W 4- "
, :I T,
5 ::'
g - y. . 3 . 3 &*E ==R .A A
yu2 3.,3 1 *::tI 8
-,~
iE m ...w .. v .
R e .e * *
- 3 '
U
'N 1.
k
" 2""
I. .
'6' a 3 ..
.e er k
- 4 7 si .'
.e .=, , E f
! l l
l 1
- 4 a a .m __2aa - - _ _- . _- - _2 A - m, . _ma
- .a I
e 4
l 1
4
?
}.
e
' Sb M ,M gg ,
-- a -- - -- ,
- m
- 9 g, e
e 0
6 EXDIBIT = G -
w _ .. . . -- w ,
S i
5 et e
e b
O 9' M
.g.
9 9
9
.-...x
0$
et u . - - , .
~ '
Tess Nuclear Plant i Probed for Violations '
blde AledIhoutrede ofComplaints . -
4 -
By C s Puesa. ,
' ===.e. ne ma m.,
o .wm bM
- h. h.iW.t ed a w Cm IreWEOSeet.Md mi eene. a.d e M S.ech-Mi
- I E % of aTeens amateur pseer e
Snm to emmeness the ynnet.-
ihese a#e E8 l i
f shst anar.wHe=tes heedrede er Mac ensais eene as m esemise irge,ghggpggggjg
. i w nom se.s v werbere = = a., cier w wea ener ihe reseks snow een 800 em 308 NI[e .'... / scoldd
- .e.t eas philtenuawe.peertye angemered, a si =
- re.s m notn.*. ,
l en dsru k 'ond nur Weimas a decy isra manerement, abens half W N0ll400 close to Mie p -
same, passenig egny. ded n.,
d the seen Tasms Asemens a m Nec demame, 80Nih busplant.,
x nemi se.r as, at, a.w me *.* en*= = w , _ ,. e . ,
me Nacinnteu a.m meime,ee, veien bene metand backward m )
tism we og asses esir apptendes . the ime of weihng matertais, ens kr a hs.pener noenes, whis me, and hans that may est new been l
. ha seen = d = m re , m as.t m .e a . *mened a heads the anon d a
- ""'"' plant.
The 5eeth Teena Medaar Protect b ene d ahenshd
- macisarsinnes The aiheetmas were mede W
- avaline houses hr to NBC. Tbs ame then i 40 plant , werbers
" ernsh the c wrnment Amesume.
. t=uma power namen in tweed by i a fear utiiny conneetten headed by ability Propect (GAM, as orgh i
the Mounten Pe.er a usht ca. nies that dedunde whistie.uswere.
1 (HPa!.) and hee been ander con- GAP has eduesd le eroise aesnan j mrecties for mergr then 12 yeare, d the werhers,who dner ree#dmi, The $ ret uit of the 88.5 be1Een pro, hun asowed the WRC to onesome the temphants aher a tederal judge
) isce sea imeled las mene and la rehdied NRC's'esert es set me -
j espected a basa % sper.
ation this usee. workers' asame throedi a suhpoo.' ,
UaWie the Seahreek and b as. '
l ham endeer pine:a etg a,angeg HP&L ;:' r: Grahas Paint-
! NRC Ecnans in na Northeast, me er esad the miikr had met been ok i fach iesas plast has not been a hF"ed to see the eBegstaarm but enid
! serget of a*==laar actrvisse er plant othesels think that they are
! commerty arl-- However, a
- end compiamta?
! has been dagged by c., e x g *tt that's the caes we're not coe.
! eheddy constacdos and inept man- cerwed? Painter said. "4 we leched - 4 at it. ether we took correceve ac- l l aasmeet as ha cast asared u store
- then 400 percest g the inign i gg tion or k didn't 6,aeuet to ensch? l
} kBen estante. E.na Ottney, a nuclear gemed- l The NEC med MPet,3100,000 l l e ssee, een h ,,. .
) frP<satrol programa. A year htar ;
! he utikr Ared na mais centresser, l ,
' i l
NRC speheemme Jet Ostema comarseed that Cesear had erwar painted out enesweenen edsets to amat'who inventagnud the esse, as agency inspemer. Gedtimed and i shines firCAP,seu the shapalmas get)md abset everytes* bem ha 6d met imew how serise the
- d'88888
- pre er what eerremiens, d Impeper d do.
ear,the asamry had estored.
getes se et Aeoording to NRC and GAP der -
esagtNament ;
esnesen, other verhun have selsed ,
es MRC sabes ta massmen ehest the adegemer.af geneese, .
et .c. eteetrkal ashame, pipa joints and ,
'W toponest of esse 4Wess weits 1phab es inevntent emme ,
een woe, that plant is met ads,'amid
- j plainas imer appear miner. Oumer Ottmar, who has investigntyJ do. mA they suggest that the plant's i tar eenghamme ist she NkC. As as - **hPenetset psugesa is deise. <
employee of a esmadtung drin ender M {
eentruet to the NRC, Ounsy es,. N NRCinsposes rehehe#y attne j
eral years ago investismend verker et a audser power phus bedese do. i compimists about the Tennessee tiding wheear to guest t as aper, l
,, Vetsy Ashenry nacisar pinnas, a5
.. ' = - ming assese, knameA the asunny =
af whir.h an new dened ear enesty ) sechs beney on aa paper tror af neessa. .
Outremamened essmame that i h Sandh Taman, s m i woe.he.et mid, 'is wares.. !
e n hau e T a as plamt?
ese agpened aihe.luso s e. u. hthe phet l
k butt.
Jehe Cenlar, a innaar Seeth h,, Otammy amid essend guety one, Tomas worker who apeed to be F uservtswed en the record, askeead.
erst inspessere esN ter that ther were lustreated est te vertly see.
[
edend that he reportad prehtens og
- p. phnt and NRC edtads hedess ub. annuelse desumans and that anst amid they tag them to CAP, but he custarded thstrjuts. hr$mrettsdag abat snehing was done to correct 8mmut aperJet them, ,
k Corder, a 27 year tscheal ess- tuseh hun me.
- i seedser John,'she ester storee who desertes tdesmer es a as ses juts der them.
- seed coisoner man ' was a esper. IIsrbeesk' *
- W* st Sash Tasas used hg T es we immesed last Novem6er as Cerder,who ens theg4 a washed en part et weet the canapany eats was a er hadMeman oudeur pommer wwt bres eseech.
tot chains hade to the
'mbody caree,"he anM. "Nehedy 1 hues painted est wame to hear n. They'n behind -
Asse hadme, med a was i
schedek and ein at money. They an areMrnada,tw h asser hedersled
,' say thry't en is eher the pimat a runnig? to a sedseen egdent amployees Corder a Enit has has?
v==aad the N BC I Palmer mM IRC eEdah had i inW tenan se a toer Teneder tend ihr immy est 'it's typical to af the South Tees pine, whose he had een#ksd ed essereas eso, have these shrasatsas a the %st sermence a=8A== alas ha the goesse. susees' end that the rovie* *shrund l havesestussetendshg?
Ir constad Uen L Akheauk he NRC agobesman Gemmed said wea not saoud to enter Ustt 1 g the agency easy base nn!d RP&L the stat ser see the NDC aals that the latest hspection '%ss not i were a:curity rots:ss, Carter said been a dekrmg tactor" h the hcess he was art to point est ledutkal his process humane a commenaies pd*w with matal heteners se aa eixtrualpealh Delt 2. vote es the 5cesca has per.ed for other roerms. home pose. '
"'1%e fasteaers am scas, hGeo.
ing.' h otM. "N pc.t:1 is just 3.an>9 ewer tot *a siese dehyed i het sacask whca es piset dese6 stu:t r> era? The renet is e pre.
epad = emasia m d v;hrauss k ha tectM covmag erar high valtage eme!hs ersema, and at:4 N2C ne an.
wwwa plates that contret electnsat
- 4r4maat is the plaat. a.'yrac a posement p%sa with ita CaXs dec5hed to chorecaerige M tahca,' shelte that am the pkat as ade er sessia it's seed to letredans semphag egulp.
rzWke he said.1 ses verry Abent into the resseer. The temas about a at aisbar carroded la a eUniint plant na me.
piena, anewing ratimacer, sneer se epst hnte the ruecear Wg,
t CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE -
1 I certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the addressees listed below, by hand delivery on. January 26, 1988.
, 1. NRC Commissioner.s .., ,,m... m..... . . . -
g L. W Each, 3r., Chairman
, Thomas MG Roberts-i Keneath Rogers -
Frederick M. sernthal Renneth M.*Carr , ,
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Coussission
[ 1717 a street, N.W. -
, t Washington, D.C.
- 2. Secretary U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 1717 E street, N.W. .
Washington, D.C.
1 .
n
~
LEG .s D )g l
. Richard E. Condit
~
l l
l 1
, 079AA23 cert I
a 9
9 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the addressess listed below, by hand delivery on January 26, 1988. *
- 1. NRC Commissioners: .
I L. W. Sech, Jr., Chaltaan '.
Thomas M. Moberts Menneth Rogers t Frederick M. Bernthal r Kenneth J4. Carr ,
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
- 1717 E Street, W.W.t Washington, D.C.
f- 2. secretary U.S. Nuclear. Regulatory Connission 1717 E Street, W.W..
Washington, D.C. '
k
(? irl:
RLehate E. condit
., Jd
~*
l -
ie i i l j c. -
l
\ l 1
079AA23 cert !
l I
i I
I t
l
. . _ -. . - - . ~
_ _ - . . - _- _ _ _ . . -.. --