ML20196B312

Partially Withheld Memo Re Review Performed of Status of post-Technical Review Team Allegations Currently Shown as Open in Allegation Mgt Sys

ML20196B312
Person / Time
Site:	Comanche Peak
Issue date:	06/25/1987
From:	Barnes I NRC OFFICE OF SPECIAL PROJECTS
To:	Mckee P NRC OFFICE OF SPECIAL PROJECTS
Shared Package
ML20196B221	List: ML20196B216 ML20196B261 ML20196B312 ML20196B324
References
FOIA-87-558, FOIA-87-A-97 NUDOCS 8802110161
Download: ML20196B312 (3)

Text

. . . .

J Y

4s -s. ws i. .~ 1

[

'\ UNITE D $TATES

! NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

{ ,l wAs>meoTow, o. c. meses

\...../ a 2s e MEMORANDUM FOR: P. F. McKee, Deputy Director, Comanche Peak Project Division THRU: R. F. Warnick, Assistant Director for Inspection i Programs, Comanche Peak Project Division FROM: I. Barnes, Senior Project Inspector, Comanche Peak Project Division

SUBJECT:

STATUS OF POST TRT ALLEGATIONS SHOWN AS OPEN IN ALLEGATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM )

l A review has been performed of the status of post TRT allegations currently shown as open in the Allegation Management System. The tabulation below sununarizes the results of this review.

OSP ALLEGATION NO CORRESPONDING RIV INSPECTION NRC INSP.

ALLEGATION NO. STATUS REPORT OSP-86-A-0148 4-86-A-0005 Open --

(See Note 1)

/ OSP-86-A-0149 4-86-A-013 Complete 86-26/86-22# %

OSP-86-A-0150 4-86-A-015 Complete 86-15/86-1 #

(See Note 2)

OSP-86-A-0151 4-86-A-019 Open -- T (See Note 3)

- OSP A-0152 4-86-A-026 Complete 86-22/86-20d' OSP-80-A-0154 4-86-A-050 Complete 86-26/86-22*

(See Note 4)

/OSP A-0155 4-86-A-052 Complete 86-31/86-25h Ag

/OSP-86-A-0156 4-86-A-056 Complete 86-26/86-22# A7 OSP-86-A-0157 4-86-A-066 Hone planned --

(See Note 5)

OSP-86-A-0158 4-86-A-072 None Planned -- 4 (See Note 6)

A)SP-86-A-0159 4-86-A-079 Complete 86-31/86-25A 4; vt>SP-86-A-0160 4-86-A-107 Complete 86-31/86-254 4; a

Note 1: The twc conceras RIV agreed to handle require more detai in is to be rformed.

Note 2: Reconnend RIV Allegation Coordinator be contacted regarding closeout status.

g,1 0 70lO

^ 7 h 7 -A'9

-s e P. F. McKee , 2 Noto 3: Subjects referred by RIV to applicant for followup.

Applicant status requires checking before determination of CPPD required actions.  ;

fote 4: T assessments complete.

Recommend RIV Allegation Coor nator ntacted for his input on this subject.

isto 5: No e ifics rovided alle er to site staff.

Subject was re err ek to RIV Allegation Coordinator. Reconmend h administrative closecut after contact with RIV Allegation t

l Coordinator. l

(

oto 6:

t 10 recomended that, for those allegations which assessments are emplete and documented in issued inspection reports, the specific sedback status to allegers be established and appropriate actions akon to close out the items. ,

I. Barnes, Senior Project i

1 Inspector, Comanche Peak Project Division C3

. Gower *

. Hale '

. Lyons ....

t .*

. Warnick j;,U 4 - .

l "

_?

l ? '* M .' .

"  ; ;i.'. *

,'h, .0,, -

QK.

9, .i -

0:q;.D .

e ig e

-- - --" ~ ~ ~ " ~ ~ ~ " " - ' " ~ ~

'.g-MEETING ON ALLEGATION MANAGEMENT PROCESS OBJECTIVES

1. Obtain cursory overview of regional instruction dealing with management of allegations and step through the mechanics of an example.

2. Outline process for managing and categorizing allegations; cross-referencing against employee concern-type programs; unique sorting / presentation techniques.

3. Obtain a brief synopsis of status of project allegations.

4. Outline suggested criteria the Allegation Review Connittee may use during their deliberations.

S. View the typical content of allegation files.

6. Define the work outstanding to complete the transition of allegation files from the Region to OSP.

FO LA-En-658

! Ch I