ML20195G517

RCS Cold Hydrostatic Test Rept

ML20195G517
Person / Time
Site:	Comanche Peak
Issue date:	06/16/1988
From:	TEXAS UTILITIES ELECTRIC CO. (TU ELECTRIC)
To:
Shared Package
ML20195G515	List: ML20195G510 ML20195G517
References
ER-ME-01, ER-ME-1, NUDOCS 8806280025
Download: ML20195G517 (182)

Text

..

O UNIT 1 REACTOR COOLANT SYSTEM l

COLD HYDROSTATIC TEST l

ASSESSMENT O

l l

JUNE 16, 1988 O

gr%8n $8%r

\\

($)

~

OBJECTIVES l

1.

DETERMINE THE EXTENT TO WHICH THE UNIT 1

RCS COLD HYDROSTATIC IEST SUCCESSFULLY DEMONSTRATED SYSTEM INTEGRITY AND SATISFIED APPLICABLE ASME CODE REQUIREMENTS.

2-DETERMINE THE EXTENT TO WHICH PROCEDUREL CONTROLLING THE UNIT 1 RCS COLD HYDROSTATIC TESY PROVIDED NECESSARY GUIDANCE FOR PREPARATION, CONDUCT, AND REVIEWS OF THE TEST.

3.

DETERMINE THE EXTENT TO WHICH OC PERSONNEL PERFORMING ACCEPTANCE INSPECTIONS WERE QUALIFIED TO CONDUCT INSPECTIONS.

4.

IDENTIFY AND PROPOSE RESOLUTION OF ANY POTENTIALLY DISCREPANT CONDITIONS.

O 5.

IDENTIFY ANY AREAS WHERE PROCESS ENHANCEMENTS COULD CONTRIBUTE TO MORE DEFINITIVE AND COMPREHENSIVE TEST PACKAGES.

l l

1 i

6 O

l I

l

-=

O ASSESSMENT METH000 LOG _Y 0

IDENTIFY APPLICABLE ASME CODE AND REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS 0

DEVELOP A

MATRIX CORRELATING PROGRAPMAYIC ASME CODE HYDROSTATIC TEST REQUIREMENTS TO PROCEDURE REQUIREMENTS 0

INDEPENDENTLY REVIEW RCS CODE HYDROSTATIC TEST RELATED i

RF AR E

N N

T N

O E

I O

EVALUATE THE ADEQUACY OF THE RCS COLD HYDROSTATIC TEST RELATED PROCEDURES WITH RESPECT TO CODE AND REGULTTORY 2REMENTS O

GENERATE APPROPRIATE CORRECTIVE ACTION DOCUMENTATION FOR POTENTIALLY DISCREPANT CONDITIONS IN ACCORDANCE WITH EXISTING PROCEDURES 0

REVIEW QUALIFICATION OF INSPECTION PERSONNEL, RELATIVE TO APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS 0

EVALUATE GOVERNING PROCEDURES WITH RESPECT TO CURRENT PRACTICES AND GUIDANCE AND SUGGEST ENHANCEMENTS FOR FUTURE I

ASME HYDROSTATIC TEST:

l l

O l

l

nv APPLICABLE CODE AND PROCEDURES l

O CODE REQUIREMENTS ASME BOILER AND. PRESSURE VESSEL CODE SECTION III DIVISION I 1980 EDITION THROUGH SUM:4ER 1981 ADDENDA 0

PROCEDURES CP-CPM-6.9I, REV. 5, DCN 2, "PRESSURE TESTING" CP-QAP-12.1, REY. 3, "INSPECTION CRITERIA AND DOCUMENTATION REQUIREMENTS PRIOR TO RELEASE FOR PRESSURE IESTING"

([)

CP-QAP-12.2, REY. 3, "INSPECTION PROCEDURE AND ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA FOR ASME PRESSURE TESTING" CP-QAP-18.2, REV. 2, "QUALITY ASSURANCE Ra VIEW OF ASME III DOCUMENTATION" ICP-PT-55-01, REY. O, "REACTOR LOOLANT SYSTEM COLD HYDROSTATIC TEST" O

UNIT 1 RCS COLD HYDRO PROCESS DIAGRAM ESPONSIBLE GROUPS ACTIVITY GOVERNING PROCEDURES PRESSURE TEST DATA PACKAGE INITIATION STARTUP ENGINEERING RESSURE TEST DATA CP-CPM-6.91 REV. 5 SHEET CP-P T-5 5-01

- TEST PARAMETERS

- TEST BOUNDARIES (FLOW DIAGRAMS) 1 U

PRESSURE TEST DATA PACKAGE TUSI ENGINEERING CP-CPM-6.91 REV. 5 REVIEW AND CONCUR-O RENCE U

B&R QUALITY QA DOCUMENTATION CP-CPM-6.91 REV. 5 ASSURANCE REVIEW PRETEST WALKDOWN CP-QAP-12.1 REV. 3 ASME DOCUMENTATION CP-QAP-12.1 REV. 3 COMPLETENESS REVIEW CP-QAP-18.2 REV. 2 VERIFICATION OF CP-QAP-12.1 REV. 3 PTDS TEST PARAMETERS e WELDS, JOINTS, BASE METAL REPAIRS, HIGH STRESS AREAS &

ACCESSIBILITY O

u

UNIT 1 RCS COLD HYDRO PROCESS DIAGRAM (CONTINUED)

OESPONSIBLE GROUPS ACTIVITY GOVERNING PROCEDURES ANI REVIEW AND PRETEST CP-QAP-12.1 REV. 3 HSB ANI CONCURRENCE CP-CPM-6.91 REV. 5 V

PRETEST SYSTEM REVIEW TO VERIFY PREREQUISITES /

STARTUP ENGINEERING ALIGNMENTS / INSTRUMENTS, CP-CPM-8.91 REV. 5 ETC.

C P-P T-5 5-01 U

-8.91 REV. 5 STARTUP ENGINEERING SYSTEM PRESSURIZATION CP-PT-5 5-01 O

B&R QC TEST INSPECTION CP-QAP-12.2 REV. 3 B&R QC SYSTEM INSPECTION CP-QAP-12.2 REV. 3 MANUFACTURER /ANI ANI l

V DEPRESSURIZATION AND CP-PT-5 5-01 STARTUP ENGINEERING SYSTEM RESTORATION CP-CPM-6.91 REV. 5 V

B&R QC HYDROSTATIC TEST CP-QAP-12.2 REV. 3 ACCEPTANCE O

y

l UNIT 1 RCS COLD HYDRO PROCESS DIAGRAM (CONTINUED)

O RESPONSIBLE GROUPhi ACTIVITY GOVERNING PROCEDURES STARTUP ENGINEERING B&R QA TEST COMPLETION CP-CPM-8.91 REV. 5 CP-QAP-12.2 REV. 3 NOFF TUSl ENGINEERING V

STARTUP ENGINEERING FINAL APPROVAL OF 1 CP-P T-5 5- 01 WESTINGHOUSE HYDROSTATIC TEST MANAGER PLANT OPERATIONS TUSl ENGINEERING, CONSTRUCTION MANAGER

' TNAGER NUCLEAR OPERATIONS O

U B&R QUALITY N-5 DATA REPORT ASSURANCE CP-QAP-18.2 REV. 2 ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PREPARATION U

HSB ANI ANI N-5 DATA REPORT CP-QAP-18.2 REV. 2 REVIEW AND CERTIFICATION U

B&R SITE QA MANAGER N-5 DATA REPORT CP-QAP-18.2 REV. 2 SUBMITTED TO OWNER'S DESIGNATED REPF'.ESENTATIVE O

O DOCUMENTATION ~ REVIEWED 0

FLOW DIAGRAMS O

CPSES PIPING IS0 METRICS O

FABRICATOR SPOOL SKETCHES O

ALL WELD DOCUMENTATION PACKAGES ASSOCIATED WITH SPOOLS (VENDOR AND INSTALLER)

O CPSES HANGER DRAWINGS o

ALL RCS COLD HYDROSTATIC TEST DOCUMENTATION O

APPLICABLE CODE DATA REPORTS O

APPLICABLE N-5 CODE DATA REPORTS RESULTS l

0 37 BASE METAL REPAIRS INVOLVING WELDING WERE IDENTIFIED.

()

ALL OF THESE UASE METAL REPAIRS WERE LOCATED IN THE INSPECTION ZONE OF A CIRCUMFERENTIAL BUTT WELD IDENTIFIED ON THE HYDROSTATIC TEST ISOMETRIC.

O 36 INTEGRAL WELDED ATTACHMENTS WERE IDENTIFIED.

32 WERE l

SPECIFICALLY LOCATED AND IDENTIFIED ON THE HYDROSTATIC TEST l

ISOMETRIC.

TWO ATTACHMENTS WERE LATER IDENTIFIED IN 1982 ON NCR'S AND SUBSEQUENTLY RETESTED.

TWO ADDITIONAL ATTACHMENTS l

ARE IDENTIFIED ON NCR 88-09482 AND NCR 88-09483 AND DISPOSITIONED WITHOUT HARDWARE IMPACT.

O ALL SPOOL SKETCHES IDENTIFYING BASE METAL REPAIRS INVOLVING WELDING AND WELDS FOR PIPING SPOOLS SUPPLIED BY FABRICATORS l

WERE ATTACHED TO THE HYDROSTATIC TEST ISOMETRIC.

I 1

O l

l

()

SU$504RY i

OBJECTIVE -

DETERMINE THE EXTENT TO WHICH THE UNIT 1 RCS COLD HYDROSTATIC TEST SUCCESSFULLY DEMONSTRATED SYSTEM INTEGRITY AND SATISFIED APPLICABLE ASME CODE REQUIREMENTS.

RESULTS THE COMPLETED RCS COLD HYDROSTATIC TEST DEMONSTRATES SYSTEM INTEGRITY AND SATISFIES APPLICABLE ASME SECTION III CODE REQUIREMENTS BECAUSE:

0 THE SUBJECT CODE CLASS BOUNDARY WAS ADEQUATELY PRESSURIZED TO ASME SECTION III

(])

REQUIREMENTS.

O THE SUBJECT CODE CLASS PIPING SYSTEM WAS INSPECTED TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF ASME SECTION III.

O THE TEST WAS ACCEPTED TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF ASME SECTION III BY THE NA CERTIFICATE HOLDER.

l 0

NOME OF THE DISCREPANT ITEMS IDENTIFIED

(

AGAINST THE TEST AFFECT THE INTEGRITY OR ADEQUACY OF THE TEST.

ALL HAVE BEEN i

l DISPOSITIONED IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPROVED PROCEDURES.

O i

i

O O

SU+94ARY' (CONT.)

OBJECTIVE -

DETERMINE THE EXTENT TO WHICH PROCEDURES CONTROLLING THE UNIT 1 RCS COLD HYDROSTATIC TEST PROVIDED NECESSARY GUIDANCE FOR PREPARATION, CONDUCT, AND AEVIEWS OF THE TEST.

RESULTS THE APPLICABLE REVISIONS OF CP-Q4P-12.1, CP-QAP-12.2, CP-QAP-18.2, CP-CPM-6.9I AND CP-PT-55-01

()

1)

PROVIDED THE APPROPR7 ATE CRITERIA FOR PERFORMING THE TEST TO F.

'T THE REQUIREMENTS OF ASME SECTION III, 2)

WERE ADEQUATELY IMPLF.MENTED BY THE RESPONSIBLE ORGANIZATIONS, AND 3)

RESULTED IN DOCUMENTATION WHICH DEMONSTRATES THE SATISFACTORILY COMPLETION OF TH3 TEST.

I l

()

l 1

l'

($1 SUh9tARY (cont.)

OBJECTIVE -

DETERMINE THE EXTENT TO WHICH QC PERSONNEL PERFORMING ACCEPTANCE INSPECTIONS WERE QUALIFIED TO CONDUCT INSPECTIONS.

RESULTS THE COMANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM (CPRT)

REVIEWED IMPLEMENTATION OF THE QUALIFICATION AND CERTIFICATION PROGRAM BY REVIEWING BROWN AND ROOT ASME CERTIFICATION RECORDS.

THE CERTIFICATION RECORDS OF EACH OF THE THIRTY-ONE (31)

INSPECTORS UTILIZED FOR THE HYDROSTATIC TEST PROGRAM HAVE

()

BEEN EVALUATED IN DETAIL AND DID NOT REVEAL ANY MATTERS OF CONCERN REGARDING QUALIFICATION OR CERTIFICATION.

O

O

SUMMARY

(CONT.)

OBJECTIVE -

IDENTIFY AND PROPOSE RESOLUTION OF ANY POTENTIALLY DISCREPANT CONDITIONS.

RESULTS THE RCS COLD HYDROSTATIC TEST ASSESSMENT IDENTIFIED A TOTAL OF 8

DISCREPANT CONDITIONS (E.c., 2 NCR'S AND 6 DR'S).

THESE CONDITIONS WERE REVIEWED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ESTABLISHED PROCEDURES AND NONE OF THESE CONDITIONS WERE DETERMINED TO IMPACT THE VALIDITY OF THE TEST.

O l

t l

(

l.

i e

O SUt#tARY' (coorr. )

OBJECTIVE -

IDENTIFY ANY AREAS WHERE PROCESS ENHANCEMENTS COULD CONTRIBUTE TO MORE DEFINITIVE AND COMPREHENSIVE TEST PACKAGES.

RESULTS IMPLEMENT A UNIT 2

CODE CONTROL PROGRAM THAT INCLUDES WITNESSING AND VERIFICATION THAT PRES $URES TESTS ARE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH T(lE INSTALLER'S QA PROGRAM, APPROVED PROCEDURES AND CPSES CODE COMMITMENTS.

O l

t t

I l

1 l

l l

O

y "1UELECTRIC OFFICEMEMORANDUM

~

NE-19895 To:

R.

T. Jenkins (E15)

COMANCHE PEAK STEAM ELECTRIC STATION RCS COLD HYDROSTATIC TEST ASSESSMENT As requested by NE-19869, the assessment of the Reactor Coolant System (RCS) Cold Hydrostatic Test is attached.

The assessment describes the activities associated with the completion of the test, presents the results of the assessment and the adequacy of the RCS Cold Hydrostatic Test.

C. K. f.uk Fred W. Madden (EIS) jg7 MDS:vjt Attachment cc:

ARMS (OL,0A) (E06)

O.

W.

Lowe (lL,lA) (E07)

O

..... _ _ _ _ ~.. _.. _..

• p;

-4 o

REACTOR COOLANT SYSTEM COLD HYDROSTATIC TEST REPORT ER-ME-01 l

JUNE 16, 1988 4

i t

TU ELECTRIC COMANCHE PEAK ENGINEERING i

M./

I/

f g sxd5 i

eREginEo oY O

w

1 ABSTRACT O

This report describes the activities associated with the comple-tion of the Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station, Unit 1 Reactor Coolant System' Cold Hydrostatic Test and presents the results of an asseselent and the adequacy of the RCS Cold Hydrostatic Test.

The results indicate that the RCS Cold Hydrostatic Test was adequately performed in accordance with approved procedures which complied with ASME Section III.

O O

l 1

l l

.. ~

2 I.

Introduction The purpose of the CPSES Reactor Coolant System (RCS)

Cold k',)N Hydrostatic Test completed on July 30 and 31, 1982, was to verify the, integr!ty of components and welded joints within the RCS test boundary.

The test boundary included Code Class 1 piping and portions of Code Class 2 piping.

The test was implemented by Brown and Root (B&R) and TU Electric Startup Department (S/U) and verified by Authorized Nuclear Inspectors.

B&R, as the ASME Section III NA Certificate Holder, was responsible for installation, testing, inspec-tion, and certification of the CPSES Code Class piping systems.

TU Electric S/U was responsible for establishing the test boundary, test parameters and achieving the re-quired test pressures for the B&R inspection.

The RCS Cold Hydrostatic Test was performed to the requirements of ASME Section III, Division 1, 1980 Edition th.cugh the Summer 1981 Addenda.

The CPSES site specific procedures used by B&R to implement this test were:

CP-CPM-6.9I, Rev.

F, DCN 2 "Pressure Testing" o

o CP-QAP-12.1, Rev.

3, "Inspection Criteria and Documenta-tion Requirements Prior to Release for Pressure Testing" CP-QAP-12.2, Rev.

3, "Inspection Procedure and Accep-o tance Criteria for ASME Pressure Testing" CP-QAP-18.2, Rev.

2, "Quality Assurance Review of ASME o

()

III Documentation" The following procedure was used by TU Electric S/U to conduct the test:

ICP-PT-55-01, Rev.

O, "Reactor Coolant System Cold Hydro-static Test" l

II. Hydrostatic Test Methodology Included in the implementation of the overall test program were provisions and requirements for performance and verifi-l cation of documentation reviews, preparation of test pack-l ages, test performance, and documentation of test results.

1 In accordance with procedure CP-CPM-6.6I, "Pressure Test-ing," the Startup Test Engineer initiated the Cold Hydro Pressure Test Data Package, 1CP-PT-55-01, and a

Pressure Test Data Sheet indicating test parameters.

In doing so, he established the test boundaries and then delineated them by l

highlighting the applicable system flow diagrams.

After review and concurrence by Texas Utilities

Services, Inc.

(TUSI) Engineering, the test package was sent, as required by CP-CPM-6.9I, to the B&R Site QA Manager for a QA documen-tation review and to obtain Authorized Nuclear Inspector (ANI) concurrence.

O 1

l l

l l

l

3 To ensure all ASME construction documentation was complete and satisfactorily reconciled with Code and specification

{^/)

requirements, B&R Quality Engineering performed a documenta-s_

tion review per procedure CP-QAP-18.2, "Quality Assurance Review of ASME III Documentation".

In preparation for the test, the B&R Completions Quality Engineering Group was required to verify and status the completion of the CP-QAP-18.2 documentation review in accordance with proce-dure CP-QAP-12.1, "Inspection Criteria and Documentation Requirements Prior to the Release for Pressure Testing".

A "Documentation Status Form", Attachment I to CP-QAP-12.1, was completed for eac'h drawing (BRP) associated with the test. Additionally, the B&R Completions Quality Engineering Group reviewed vendor NPP-1 Code Data Reports and piping spool documentation packages for all piping subassemblies included in the test boundary to assure the acceptability of that documentation and to identify the presence or absence of any vendor base metal repairs.

It was also the responsi-bility of the B&R Completions Quality Engineering Group to walk down the test boundary prior to the hydrostatic testing to confirm the results of the documentation reviews and to assess the acceptability of the piping system for testing (including removal of insulation as required by CP-CPM-6.9I) as required by CP-QAP-12.1.

The results of these pre-test reviews were then transferred to the hydrostatic test copies of the BRPs.

Because BRPs were not revised during this timeframe to incorporate all

(-s'-)

information required for test performance, notes were written in red ink on the test BRPs indicating the presence or absence of base metal repairs involving welding and hangers involving integrally welded attachments.

Other processes that were accomplished by performing grinding operations may also have been termed base metal repairs by B&R; however, if the minimum design wall thickness as delineated in the design specification and ASME Section III was not violated and no weld buildup was performed, these areas were not identified in red ink on the test BRPs as a

specific inspection location.

Inspection of these non-welded base metal repairs is not required by ASME Section III during hydrostatic testing.

Copies of Component Modification Cards (CMCs) and vendor spool fabrication drawings were attached to the test BRPs to identify welds which were not shown directly on the test BRPs.

't The highlighted test BRPs, with reference drawings and other applicable information attached, were then incorporated into the Pressure Test Data Package along with a Quality Check-list, which was completed by the QC inspector witnessing the test as required by procedure CP-QAP-12.2, "Inspection l

Procedure and Acceptance Criteria for ASME Pressure Test-l ing."

Due to the size and time considerations associated l

with the RCS cold hydrostatic test, the single Presnure Test Data Sheet, initiated by Startup, was supplemented with

4 eleven (11) Pressure Data Sheet Attachments each covering a

specific portion of the total test bo'undary.

These elaven I-s (11) supplemental attachments were used by B&R ASME Quality

\\s-Control as the basis for the approval signature on the Quality checklist.

The personnel who performed the Quality Control witnessing of the test were qualified and certified to perform such duties under a qualification and certification program which was subjected to the checks and balances inherent in an ASME program (i.e.,

ANI monitoring and ASME surveys).

The Comanche Peak Response Team (CPRT) reviewed implementation of the program by reviewing Brown and Root ASME cer t i fi ca-tion records.

The certification records of each of the thirty-one (31) inspectors utilized for the hydrostatic test program have been evaluated in detail and did not reveal any matters of concern regarding qualification or certification.

Each was certified to the correct area of qualification (MIFI:

Mechanical Inspector, Fabrication Inspector).

Based on the acceptability of the certification records a..d other factors, the CPRT concluded that the Brown and Root QC inspection certification program was satisfactory.

The performance and inspection of the RCS cold hydrostatic test met the requirements of CP-CPM-6.9I, CP-QAP-12.2 and ICP-PT-55-01.

After pressurizing the test boundary to 1.25 times the RCS design preesure, satisfying the required hold times and reducing to inspection pressure, as documented by

(

signatures within ICP-P1-55-01, inspection teams inspected their designated area.

The inspection teams and their respective inspection areas were documented on the Pressure Data Sheet Attachments.

The B&R Quality Control inspectors were also verbally instructed to examine the entire piping system for leaks while giving particular attention, as required by CP-QAP-12.2, to areas of welded Joints, connee-tions, base metal repairs involving welding and regions of high stress.

Acceptance of the test to the applicable inspection requirements was documented on each of the Pressure Test Data Sheet Attachments by Quality control and ANI signature.

Acceptance of the pressure test for the i

entire cold hydrostatic test boundary, as defined by the highlighted flow diagrams contained in the test package, was l

documented by Test Engineer, B&R Quality Assurance, ANI and TU Electric approval signatures on each flow diagram, as required by CP-CPM-6.9I (Figure 6.9I-2).

Documentation of acceptance was also provided on the overall Pressure Test Data Sheet and Quality Checklist as required by CP-CPM-6.9I and CP-QAP-12.2 respectively.

Acceptance of the pressure test, as required by CP-CPM-6.9I and CP-QAP-12.2. of vendor components, such as the pressurizer, steam generators, reactor coolant pumps and portions of the reactor

vessel, documented by approval signature was on the components Code Data Report by the manufacturer and the manufacturers' ANI.

After all post-test reviews were complete, the final test I

l 5

results were then reviewed and approved by the Lead Startup Engineer, Manager of Plant Operations, Westinghouse Site

(~')i Manager, TUSI Engineering, Construction Manager and the

\\_

Manager of Nuclear Operations, as documented by approval signature on the ICP-PT-55-01 cover sheet.

III. TU Electric Assessment Based on issues expressed by the NRC and Texas Department of Labor and Standards (TDLS) with the Unit 1 Cold Hydrostatic Test. TU Electric initiated an assessment of the adequacy of the hydrostatic test including an evaluation of the issues expressed by the NRC and TDLS.

This assessment included:

Determination of design pressures, o

Calibration accuracy of pressure standards, o

o Test pressure of 1.25 vs. 1.5 times design pressure, and the following items related to IR 85-07/05:

Hydrostatic related procedures (including practices),

o ASME Section III programmatic hydrostatic testing requirements, Hydrostatic testing related records.

o Each of the specific areas that was included in this assess-ment is discussed separately below.

(~

i A.

Determination of Design Pressures e

1

'J A potential deficiency concerning the determination and application of design pressures as related to CPSES hydrostatic test programs was identified on SDAR CP-88-03.

This potential deficiency was evaluated and deemed not reportable under the provisions of 100FR50.55(e),

as documented in letter no. TXX-88121.

1 B.

Calibration Accuracy of Pressure Standards A

potential deficiency concerning the calibration accuracy of pressure standards was identified on SDAR CP-87-08.

This potential deficiency was evaluated and deemed not reportable under the provisions of 100FR50.55(e),

as documented in letter no. TXX-88208.

l C.

TEST PRESSURE OF 125% VS.

150% OF DESIGN PRESSURE i

CPSES applied a

test pressure of 1.25 times system Design Pressure instead of 1.5 times system Design

/"'T Pressure as invoked by subsubarticle NC-6221, 1974

(,/

Edition, Summer Addenda of ASME Section III.

The 1974 Edition, Summer Addenda is the CPSES Unit 1

piping system Code of Record (ref. NA-ll40(c)).

6 Specification / Code Requirements

{~T o ASME Section III, 1974 Edition subparagraph NA-ll40( f) s,)

states:

Code Editions,

Addenda, and Cases which have not become mandatory on the contract date for a componer may be used by mutual consent of Owner or his ager.

and Manufacturer or Installer on or after the dates permitted by (a) through (d) above.

It is permitted to use specific provisions within an Edition or Addenda provided that all related requirements are met.

o FSAR Table 5.2-1 delineates the applicable ASME Section III Editions and Addenda for Reactor Coolant System Components, FSAR 3.9N.1.1 specifies that the primary and secondary o

hydrostatic tests of the Reactor Coolant System are to be conducted at 1.25 times the design pressure.

o FSAR 3.98.3 states that:

"... as permitted by paragraph NA-ll40 of the 1974 Edition of the

code, specific paragraphs in more recent editions and addenda of the ASME Code have been invoked."

2323-MS-100,Section II, Item 15 specifies that the o

testing of Class 1, 2

and 3 pressure retaining mate-rials is to meet the requirements of the 1980 Edition, Summer 1981 Addenda.

2323-MS-200 provides the same requirements for testing of Class 1, 2 and 3 pressure retaining materials.

Confirmatory Action No action for this item is required.

As allowed by ASME Section III, FSAR and referenced Design Specifications, hydrostatic testing of Code Class 1, 2 and 3

piping systems was conducted in accordance with the 1980 Edition, Summer 81 Addenda.

This specific edition and addenda defines the minimum hydrostatic test pressure to be 1.25 times the design pressure.

l D.

HYDROSTATIC TESTING RELATED PROCEDURES l

Applicable revision levels of procedures CP-QAP-12.1, CP-QAP-12.2, CP-QAP-18.2, CP-CPM-6.9I AND CP-PT-55-01 were reviewed to determine if:

they provided the appropriate criteria for performing o

the applicable purpose, O

--w,-

--e

.~

d 7

o the requirements, stated within, were fulfilled by the responsible organization (s) and

(~)g

• the applicable practices used to_ implement the RCS

(_

cold hydrostatic test were delineated within the procedures.

The following items were noted as a

result of the procedure review:

ITEM 1 CP-QAP-12.2, Paragraph 3.4 states in part:

"The Quality _ Engineering Review Group shall verify that ali documentation within the subject test bound-ary is complete and reviewed in accordance with CP-QAP-18.2.

All documentation pertaining to the subject test boundary shall be statused on a Documen-tation Status Form..."

The Documentation Status Form was used by B&R to status documentation pertinent to the subject test boundary.

This form was not retained as a permanent plant record.

CP-QAP-18.2 did not specifically direct B&R to review vendor documentation (e.g.,

spool

sketches, repair process records, etc.) for the identification of vendor welds and vendor base metal repairs.

()

Procedure / Code Requirement (s)

ASME Section III, NA-4932 allows the owner to designate which records are to be maintained as permanent plant records.

The retention of these records was not desig-nated by B&R or TU Electric.

ASME Section III (ref.

NX-6121, NX-6224) addresses welded joints and connections and does not differentiate between welded connections performed by various organi-zations.

Confirmatory Action -

Verify through a records review that all applicable information was appropriately statused on the hydrostatic test isometric.

ITEM 2 CP-QAP-12.2 or other applicable procedures did not require that the vendor base metal

repairs, vendor welds, B&R base metal repairs and attachment welds be indicated on the test hydrostatic isometric drawing or to have the appropriate spool sketches attached.

The applicable procedures did not provide the direction or criteria to specifically highlight or annotate on the isometric for the presence or absence of welded repairs O

and attachments.

8 Procedure / Code Retuirement(s)

/s CP-QAP-12.2, Paragraph 2.3 states in part:

(J "Pressure tests shall be documented with a Pressure Test Data Package which shall include...a Pressure Test Data Sheet, applicable drawings marked to show the test boundaries..."

CP-QAP-12.2, Paragraph 4.0 states in part:

"No leaking sha'll be allowed at all welded

joints, connections, base metal repairs involving welding, and all regions of high stress."

ASME Section III, NA-4420 states in part that, "proce-dures shall include appropriate quantitative or qualita-tive criteria for determining that important activities have been accomplished."

Confirmatory Action Verify through a records review of all RCS Cold Hydro-static Test documentation that test isometrics were appropriately highlighted and annotated and the vendor spool sketches identifying welded base metal repairs and welds were attached.

I \\

ITEM 3 U

The test isometrics indicate in some cases that no welded base metal repairs were present.

After review of applicable installation documentation and spool pack-ages, base metal repair welds and base metal repairs were identified.

The base metal repair welds identified are located in the regions of circumferential butt welds.

These base metal repair welds were made at the spool fabricator's shop and at the CPSES site.

The base metal repairs identified did not include welding.

These repairs did not violate the minimum design wall thick-ness as delineated in the design specifications and ASME Section III.

Procedure / Code Requirement (s)

ASME Section III NX-6121 and NX-6224 state in

part, respectively:

I "All joints, including welded joints shall be exposed for examination during the test" l

"... all

joints, connections, and regions of high l

stress shall be examined for leakage."

O

1 9

Inspection of non-welded base metal repairs is not 7_

required by NX-2000 and NX-4000 during the hydrostatic test.

Confirmatory Action Determine through a

fabrication, insta11stion and hydrostatic test records review where all welded base metal repairs are located and initiate appropriate retesting for repairs outside the inspection zone of any field or shop welds.

ITEM 4 The "Pressure Data Sheet Attachment" was the cover sheet used by B&R ASME Quality Control to document inspector acceptance of a specific portion of the ASME hydrostatic test.

Although not addressed in any of the applicable B&R/ construction procedures, the data sheet was used to document the individual acceptance of a specific portion of the system hydrostatic test by the applicable B&R ASME Quality Control inspector and ANI.

The Pressure Data Sheet Attachment lists the following categories and compliance statement:

Area (boundary)

Prints (applicable isometrics which delineate the f-'

area / boundary)

(,g/

Inspectors (B&R ASME Quality Control)

Lead / Alternate Inspectors "All welded joints, connections, base metal repairs involving welding, and all regions of high stress as shown on attached Isos have been hydrostatic tested and found acceptable."

B&R QCI ANI l

Procedure / Code Requirement (s)

CP-QAP-12.2, Paragraph 4.1 states in part, "Upon comple-tion of the pressure test the quality contcol inspector shall complete the Quality Checklist and check either the accept or reject space and sign and date the form."

Confirmatory Action 1

No action for this item is required.

The Pressure Data l

Sheet Attachment was used by B&R as the basis of accep-l tance for signing the Quality Checklist.

The Quality 1

1hecklist is the acceptance of the Hydrostatic Test in I

accordance with CP-QAP-12.2.

l0

)

10 E.

ASME Section III Progr_ammatic Hydrostatic Testing Requirements p_

A retiew of ASMS Section III programmatic requi'tements s-(e.g.,

NX-6000) compared the specific Code hydrostatic test related requirements to the Unit 1 Hydrostatic Test Program procedure requirements.

The matrix documenting this review is Attachment ! to this report.

The results of this review indicate no issues.

F.

HYDROSTATIC TEST RELATED RECORDS The RCS Cold Hydrostatic Test related records were reviewed to verify the completeness and accuracy of the pre-CPSES Unit 1

Cold Hydrostatic Test documentation review and test package preparation processes performed by B&R.

All piping documentation within the RCS Cold Hydrostatic Boundary was

reviewed, including that associated with piping in the Reactor Coolant, Residual Heat Recoval, F.afety Injection and Chemical and Volume Control systems, as identified on seven (7) highlighted flow diagrams originally supplied by the Startup Test hagineer The piping involved is detailed on 85 differ-ent BRPs (isometric or installation drawings) all of which are contained in the original test package.

These BRPs identify the construction piping welds and piping subassemblies (spools) which were included in the test.

(

The vendor and construction documentation packages associated with each spooi were reviewed to determine the following:

0 the piping spool numLer, o if the spool fabrication drawing, which identifien all fabricator welds, was attached to the BRP in the test

package, if vender or B&R base metal repair welds or integrally o

welded attachments existed and if so, the location on the line, and if the presenec absance of t'.ese base metal repair o

welds or integra

.y welded attachments were identified

'oy a note, in red ink, on the BRP in the original test package.

The documentation review summarized in Attachment 2 we~

recorded on checklists categcrized by BHP t'

piping spool number. provides a list of -tems and their respective deficiency Report (DR) or Nonconformance Report (NCR) number noted during the revir.

The following conclusions resulted from the documentation review:

1.

All spool sketches identifying base metal repairs Nt?

involving wciding and welds for piping spoolt i

\\d$

supplied by organizations (i.e.,

ITT

Grinnell, Southwest Fabricators) were attached to the hydro-static test isometric.

o 11 2.

All base metal repair welds were located in the inspection zone of a shop or field circumferential ID butt weld inspected during the hydrostatic test weld

\\l p

inspection.

3.

No vendor base metal repair welds existed on the primary loop piping.

4.

The notes written on the test isometrics (BRPs) which stated, "no major base metal RPSs could be located," were correct (considering 2. above).

S.

Fabricator documentation.

relative to base metal repair

welds, had been adequately reviewed to identify the subject areas.

6.

Integrally welded attachments were consistently identified and located on the hydrostatic test isometric.

The hydrostatic test isometrics and attached supporting documentation adequately iden-tify the areas within the test boundary that were requirad to be inspected.

This review verified that the pre Cold Hydrostatic Test documentation review and test package preparation performed by B&R was completed and adequate.

IV. Summary The CPSES RCS Cold Hydrostatic Test was completed by Brown and Root and TU Electric Startup utilizing procedures which

(

seet the requ!,rements of ASME Section III, 1980 Edition through the Summer 1981 Addenda and therefore which were adequate to control the activities.

The RCS cold hydro-i i

static test documents (e.g.,

hydrostatic test isometrics, l

B&R installation docu.entation, and applicable Code Data l

Reports) were initiated, developed, processed and maintained in accordance with Quality Assurance Programs / Manuals which l

were accredited u.. der the auspices of the ASME.

Addition-ally, the activities performed by B&R, to satisfy the requirements of ASME Section III, were monitored, verified oc witnessed by an Authorized Nuclear Inspection Agency representatives.

The RCS cold h'/drostatic test records and related documentation provide the necessary assurance that the hydrostatic test was completed and inspected adequately.

Issues expressed by the NRC and TDLS as well as items otherwise identified during this assessment have been satisfactorily addressed.

l O

l

-s.

ATTACHMENT 1 Page 1 of 5 ASME SECTION III, bIV. 1 80 EDITION SUMMER 81 ADDENDA, Code Para.

• Discussion Document / Procedure Satisfying Para.

Remarks NX-6111 Scope-Pressure Retaining 1) CP-QAP-12.2: Para 2.1 Components, Appurtenances 2) CP-CPM-6.9 I: Para 1.0

& Completed Systems shall be tested.

NX-6112 Pneunatic Testing CP-CPM-6.9I Not applicable to the scope of this 7

matrix.

NX-6113 Witnessing of Pressure

1) CP-QAP-12.2: Para 2.2 4 inch NPS and less Tests

2) CP-CPM-6.91: Para 2.1 & 2.2 valves and pumps are 3

exempt from ANI 1

inspection.

NX-6114.1 Time of Pressure Testing 1) B&R QA Manual

1) Completion of Test upon system completion

2) Specification 2323-MS-100 required prior to prior to initial operation filing N-5/N-3 NX-6114.2 (a)

References 6114.2(b) for N/A Ref. NX-6114.2 (b) exemptions to NX-6111 NX-6114.2 (b)

System Pressure Tests

1) CP-CPM-6.4I:

Para. 8.0 Ref. NX-6114.2 (b) may be substituted for

2) CP-QAP-12.2:

Para 2.4 (1) - (3) a component pressure test provided (1)-(3) are met.

l l

. ~ *.

3 Q

Ns G

l; -

ATTACHMENT 1 Page 2 of 5 ASME SECTION III, DIV. 1 60 EDITION SUMMER 81 ADDENDA Code Para. #

biscussion Document / Procedure Satisfying Para.

Remarks NX-6114.2 (1)

Repaired by welding

1) CP-CPM-6.91:

Para 8.0 in accordance with

2) CPo0AP-12.2:

Para 2.4 NX-4130 & NX-4450

3) B&R QA Manual

4) Specification 2323-MS-100 NX-6144.2 (2)

Postweld Heat Treatea

1) B&R ASME QA Manual i

per NX-4620 & NDE I

per NX-*l70 6 NX-4450 NX-Ll44.2 (3)

System Pressure Test

1) Specification 2323-MS-100 is required after repairs that requiro RT.

(kef. N7.-4453.4)

NX-6144.2 (c)

Valves require pressure This requirement certing prior to applies to the installation per NX-3500 N-Certificate holder only, for valves to be used as system isolation valves.

(d)

Pressure Testing of Ref. NX-6114.2 subassemblies in lieu (d) (1)-(9) of system test.

l

Q

^

V ATTACHMENT 1 Page 3 of 5 ASME SECTION III, DIV. 1 80 EDITION SUMMER 81 ADDENDA Code Para. #

Discussion Document / Procedure Satisfying Para.

Remarks (1) - (9)

Testing Requirements

1) CP-CPM-6.91 No known if (d) is invoked.

2) CP-QAP-12.2 application of j

3) B&R ASME QA Manual this code para at CPSES.

i NX-6114.3 Material pressure tests

1) CP-CPM-6.9I:

Para 1.0 & 2.2 System Pressures were i

are satisfied by

2) CP-QAP-12.2:

Para 2.2 s 3.1, 3.2

' performed for class 1 completing a system 2 and 3 piping systems.

}

pressure test.

}

NX-6115 Machining after pressure N/A Not applicable to the test scope of this matrix.

NX-6121 Exposure of joints

1) CP-QAP-12.1:

Para - 3.5 (b)

(e.g. uninsulated) l NX-6122, NX-6127 Not applicable to l

the scope of this matrix.

4 j

NX-6211 Venting

1) CP-CPM-6.9I: Para 4.2 j

NX-6212 Test medium and

1) CP-CPM-6.91: Para 3.6.2 (a) & (b) temperature i

i 4

l

f%

(~'\\ '

l

?

I ATTI.CHMENT,1 Page'4 of 5 ASME SECTION III, DIV. 1 80 EDITION SUMMER 81 ADDENDA Code Para. #

Discussion Document / Procedure Satisfying Para.

Remarks 1

1 J

NX-6221 (a) Test press - 1.25 x

1) CP-PT-55-01: Para 1.0 l

(a) - (b) design (d) press.

2) CP-CPM-6.9I: Para 3.1 (b) Vessel test press -

1.25 x Dp (c) Valves shall be tested per NX-3500 (d) Other components <

1.50 X Dp NX-6222 Maximum permissible

1) Co-CPM-6.9I, Para 2.5, 3.1, 3.6.5 The actual test pressure - < 6% of

2) CP-QAP-12.2, Para 3.6 pressure was to never 1.25 X Dp, limiting exceed 6% of test component pressure.

NX-6223 Hydrostatic test

1) CP-CPM-6.9I. Para 3.1 pressure holding time

2) CP-QAP-12.2 Para 3.1 j

NX-6224 Examination for leakage

1) CP-CPM-6.91, Para 6.0, 3.1 after application of

2) CP-QAP-12.2, Para 4.0, 3.7 pressure NX-6230 Bellows expansion joints -

Not applicable to i

the scope of this matrix.

l i

i f

i ATTACHMENT 1 Page 5 of 5 ASME SECTION III, DIV. 1 l

30 EDITION SUMMER 81 ADDENDA l

Code Para. #

Discussion Document /Proce w re Satisfying Para.

Remarks 1

4 i

6 i

1 NY.-6240 Embedded or inaccessible -

Not applicable to j

welded joints the scope of this matrix.

I NX-6300, 6400, 6500 Pr.eumatic tests (6300)

Not applicable to Press. tests gages (6400) the scope of this i

I Storage tanks (6500) matrix.

s 1

i l

1 i

4 4

I l

l 3

L L

b r

-,-u.

Page 1 of 2

[

's /

UNIT 1. COLD HYDROSTATIC TEST DOCUMENTATION REVIEW Of 353 total spools included in CPSES Unit 1 Cold

Hydro, 37 base metal repairs involving welding existed.

,16/43%

of these base metal repairs involving welding were made by the spool manufacturer / vendor.

21/57%

were made by CPSES construction / craft.

All 37/100%

of these base metal repairs involving welding were located in the inspection zone of a

circumferential butt weld identified in the test package (Ref.

Note 1).

None of these base metal repairs were specifi-cally located or identified on the copy of the BRP contained in the test rackage.

gx The notes written in red ink on each of g )

the affected BRPs indicated that no major base metal repairs were present.

Of 353 total spools included in CPSES Unit 1 Cold

Hydro, 36 integrelly welded attachments existed (see Note 2).

l All 36/100%

of cr.ese welded attachments were made by CPSES construction / craft.

32/89%

of the welded attachments were specifi-cally located and identified on the BRP in the test package with a note written in red ink indicating that hangers with welded attachments were present.

The hanger number and location were also noted in red ink on the BRP.

Of the 4/11%

not specifically located or identified on the BRP, 2

were identified on NCRs in November 1982 O

and were subsequently retested in 1983

)

(Ref. Note 3).

Therefore, 2/5%

attachmente were neither identified on the BRP nor reported on a NCR.

e Page 2 of 2

-w g

UNIT l' COLD HYDROSTATIC TEST DOCUMENTATION REVIEW NOTES:

1.

Base metal repairs involving welding were considered as being in the inspection zone of a butt weld when:

- a repair weld-was made to an end prep, prior to making the associated butt weld, and the repair weld was subsequently consumed by the butt weld.

-a repair weld was adjacent to a

butt weld as evidenced by the repair being radiographed with the butt weld.

- repair documentation clearly indicates the location of the repair with respect to the butt weld (i.e.,

running from the toe of the weld into the base metal as is the case with most min wall violations caused by prepping butt welds).

2.

Integrally welded attachments are not counted indi-vidually, but rather as a group of welds associated O

with one hanger (e.g.,

four lugs welded at one hanger location is counted as one attachment).

3. Portions of the Unit 1 cold hydrostatic test boundary were included in 13 ASME retests numbered ICP-PT-SS-OlA thru N excluding I.

O

Page 1 of 1 gg

~

MISCELLANEOUS DOCUMENTATION HIGHLTGHTS NOTED DURING THE ASSESSMENT 1.

A copy of NCR 12573S is contained in the test package.

This NCR identifies that BRPs RC-1-RB-029, 031, 032 and 033 were not included in the test package.

The NCR was dispositioned "use as is" because the plug and cap welds shown on those four BRPs were also shown and highlighted on BRP-RC-1-520-001.

2.

BRP-CS-1-RB-025 has a portion of piping not highlighted in yellow as being in the test boundary.

This condition was identified and retested per NCR 14575.

3.

The following Deficiency Reports (DRs) and Nonconformance Reports (NCRs) were issued as a re.Sult of the conducted assessment.

DR C-88-03177 DR C-88-03178 DR C-88-03179

("

DR C-88-03180 DR C-88-03181 DR C-88-03182 NCR 88-09482 NCR 88-09483 i

I l

l

{

lO I

l

Phl$ L DEFICIENCY REPORT ca Nuv8er C-B8 03177_

ACfivlTY i

DOCUMENii5) VIOL ATf D DATE C85tRVED

($

BJofo C

d F O I2.2 @d.3 6f8/28 CONOlflON DESCRIP flON' O

G P. QA P.17.2 N4 4.0

$ in Ou h k e {mkw de.l k a{

nan V

v.6<A w k..'-

u o

,~n 2 0 [ q h rai d d/ 4h I M eft. kle SCF W.I E& CASA d.ffALW M Wesset Rb 9c.cf

v. h k % F A m / Gremo ic. id;<.4k h4 A aldd 4Nb4 aM. Awe A k

hM A.z [ d L h b k b IddiM k NAk A dbd dM A N[t/se d.tRN o k

W t. f t_ht.f f,MN SIP. NO t.M kb k

' d(N las ba M l-1 C6 008 -644 E.

i Osf REPORTEgYjoggoNE EXTEN! ION REVIE D 0 E d.L. de /4 iske !Lo63 IM DI5 POSITION A5516fft6 TO DRGANIZATlON IN0lVIDUAL DUE DAT O A INITIAL /D A TE' raw ~e/m.uaa m-se vr/ + + rr Ot5PO54fiON kd Ff12. TO b'PT' A c.

Eh 1 i

\\

=:

w$u h

SUBMitttD SY DAff,,/, e a Of /b., e g APPa E A P4Pb bNM A

.V k af 8 't, hhY 0

A 15PO51 TION ACCOMPLISMt0

/

h

[

k

/>>4M, Y$

DA

'11$D&k h YJ

/El'" "5 W

) d I m A K h_ ' 7.s-A pinksac ses-e r. < r.ot C~

f Vf RIFilD BY J DAff

% 13e/

& & n N4G%kJ//&

6//r/v COpNi$

[

u u

e./

O PO l-

.e

-4/JA/wr

....,, CON,mONP,.N,0,,mC,

,,Y,,,N, v,,, s -.,U......s n.

.u,.

A r< u A s a r.1.

n g_ e. e s. 0 3,, i VdbsJted feg 2 4 L O

Rc+

c-

.-vero*=ic ~5+

i=omke eee er->-ee-es84 c,

J pea ( w pa<kaA # 4 ;A s ge, a k d J % kl % a or i-ic<.cce - c4z e u

ud

,a ~

ee. 4cd ; - c w

. o s

o. d u.c c-ah

v. %eNce. k

1. N ANsbnk icwd%

on be 4e k iscunc.

u pesw w.3 b k muhe. %

is

/d a

as uwea e

ddaed cod 4cm. Adal a uej d +ka W lo k ts GU

' Q$ ph,. LI-ce. ec.ss.on.

Me 2w 4C O

c f.

O i

o at I d D DEFICIENCY REPORT oR Nuwtv

~

C - @$. o s n R ACitVIT Y

{

DOCUVE NT[5] VIOLATED DAtt 085ERv(D b [e fo Sh bE-MP< 17. 3 ff.Y.6

[pft B6 i

CON 0lilON DE 5CRIPTION d P* MP I2.2. Gla, 4.0

.a d. '

fd E ha oA J ma rew :.>

bAbri (d>Ck a..,k M6h b Id be (c 5kAM c 765d IsoM t_ kic %

OC4)

T4 %

WC - I C6 to W % -n-es.40 m ua sak we k n reA %.ud;eA u A elld AH6 ams <.-est CA/88!6065 I

^

I F

DISPOJillON A55lGNitr10 dRGANIZAT60N. It40lviDUAL DUE DAff OA INITW DA1F I

[NYUnf5 Y[ $ S00

~)-21~SY f

g./$~((

/

Dl5PO$1 TION GY W TO AW h$

Pd cc

>d R

kk 5USMiff ED SY - DATE j4an D4 th <,

APPR

'l AT

>4C76 hI W)e6 i

SR Sw k s <rs t uHln MlM (C/MkW l

pPO5ifiONACCOvPuSio t

j r

/

d. m s/ A Z)/2- 'h & /u A 2n 2fu Acs

.. B /_ l n, d M b h L T M Arek u,u sep-pr-c c-os i

VERiflED 8Y 4 OATE d'

6 C* *t/

/

comeNTS

(/

/

l d p e

1.

E

& pet 1(

p ADVER$6 CON 0lilON PER NEO 9 01 (C51) IF YE5 5N#

C YIS YNO SIGNATURE DAff h

/ tU

[-/h 7-,

y i

7 r

p ay 2-( L c

C),wos.%s 6

pcdoy EC-l-CB 2o l f

80' R,- t RS ozo ue

, sh acYsy }icM6

')S. - t - C6-40' $

BCP br- \\ Es -odo o3 Age he Afp hAup c o#.g R-t -ici -oo 5 -cei r ad SI 106-oed,- C52 K ecJie e d (et u)c{c,4c.

mc ccucob.1h cesy, craegs o.d I pcGy n &%

r y ;re icexMQ 413 den et wyd huys.

L cuc h 12 aof dCEimr. The stabc<

ca -%

dic Sea c 't, md ckuc4x Mc le al 4 u,:q or g

uycy H$as 24. su a coey C

%pc he 4le R 6 A T4s God

<o peby G l-ce er-55 o0.

O we Q, 4..

O O

--,,n----------

A-A 1 d "L--

DEFICIENCY REPORT OR Nuvet R v

~

C-88.ost79 ACfiviiv DOCUA'ENT(5) vtOLATED f A.D CATE OB5tRvED b be c IC6Tk 6'

dI. CAP 11.2 6/. $

hiS[88 G[N CONDITION OfSCRIPTidN u-air. lz.z e r wra L O AL A och.* I, Ic h 4 al & d a J..

wy ~w we,

i,w,w am.-

v O

O D C*U Ndhb 'Tevt mke.s. 5t A Er.I - Fe -oze. es-l ozs 4 Sc-f.. sis ex>s il,A 6(LLB aos a hbei w As W < m b *.c -cM com. Llu MA r

<eJ i t x

f

',,4. J;%e+ or:or 4s We. oulema. e4 % Lk. all VA\\en.

v.

tears.

t Ww I

^

REPORTE0 8Y CATE Pg Ng g 510N R E VIE' O

O d.u he / /Is/ss / las sN DISPOSITION A551GNEO TO'ORGAPilZAfidNelNDiviOUAL DUIDATE 5/

OAINiflAl'OATE

[Aff()/$4f" /ff. $kAGGj l=29"YS

$~l**55 Ol$ POSITION.

(6fGC Tc hM. 1.

/

oc OC M

5USMITT(0 8Y DATE j a g & &,g APPR I Y

T W bill /88 R,{ hI ngy u (a /t4fse

\\,

/f f5PO51 TION ACCOMPLISHED

(

/

/

t*e124+ d Y h

/D k 2E AY&

-d b$

kb5 jfl B $5 713 W.

,A.A. A_ k _n a. #

./A 9 - PT - <* C_

-6)

VERIFIED BY DATE Y'Y $O k

ft fC4 n f COMMENT 5 4f Q

,C d

GIpff e

A0vtRSE CON 0if ON PIR NEO 9 01(C51) 18 Yt5 SN#

C vES LO liGNATURf DATI G !N!83 g

/

y..

% -E-se - 0 3 n 4 r

MiWoscrio f *J 2.of L Sir

'6p pLys 1Q1,201,301 uE fOl oh f Et - l - g5-o26, sh fahp Cb-l 26-025-l, 2O2, 302., AQ2,502 & fog 2. &

Scr c.s.I es ozs neh su (ub f* sr-n ss-a-5 g

f ser sz-I-ss cos were.

ces a d 6 k W ne

1. e p e a ce

& k d a

<cprs a&,

der % & g.

u m

6%

Ecu m'k x

% ce axe k re p.cs e

+6 lo b Lui d

" Ad )# o" A 4 =d

-fee b-+c.s Lser) 6@

4E ae ca et ode ecS L

m A &

p J % ~ - 1 J;)

in g

a4 ock<c bse

<ees -M xa..

e se e m

k d e,e%,,), aa ra;m w -he es c4 Erde.

m sa cannc.

M wa. ku,

ceg 4 Ws te a & e3 c.U Ldo gy 6 o n.es.oD.

O tAk &

ul$/s?

8 1

4 O

I 4

0

r oo Id b CEFICIENCY REPORT s

o= Nuvite C RB O S I A O

+,

AC fiv8f Y l

DOCUMENT (5) VIOLATED DATIO 85ERVED 7/'fp (ob fo R

'ic.

( P-QAP 12.1 d]. 6

(,fiSfB6 CONQlTION DE SCRIPilON (P*Qbf \\1.2. C b. VAfA AD

's 'n Ot(h '

ak r

• /

a u a t a h...R 1

1 1 f/6 /J Mroshth 'Tc"4t i me_k:e.

15ltP t 1 - e.s-o2 m dc<5 r4 hd;eA -the pw hkm+.bo 4QJ Ach A AoowW, sw mene eMJ.a LheAes i

4 mwal a tulA AMaa J /L m 'e

'% t' iot -1at'-cA z z.

y 0

L k

nEPoerto sy DArg P

• (EXTENSION REV1 EO

/0 E fdik Ns Lbsfe6f LDb3 5!

DiSPO5sTION A55H5Mo T6 OncA' N12ATICh INOlV10 VAL DUE DATE (/

OA INITIAL, DA TEf E.A!7vm4,*/nf Sum

-) r7 W i-/4-77 015PO51 TION T6 FEE '~b ArrAcbedT 1 I

OD ce

>d;:

9

& lHl e

$ Jf' s1 rySPO511,0N ACCOwsl5mio

(

f f

(

idoJti$ Ab 21u 126 6

[m d 2;fw>

h /l u

AM M, Mb JD-.% f,sae/wr

-u n-pr-cc-o ).

/

(

4/

ComEN15 f

/

N N

g gr 4

O m4

^'

ADVE RSE CONDITION PER NEO 9 of (C51) IF YE5. SN#

C YE5 kNO $6CN A tudi DAtt,b Lk M//h 8 g

[ /h 7....

NTTA(MAgdT 1,

p g,

,,g g,,,

w,7%,.n oj P4 c - 9e -o 3/80 rz.R Rdied ce N M e r P o didir

% s - ioe>- 7el-c4r R ud a

ede ideecidu A m oW J c. %,s k*dsec /deuco AmeAredt 45 VeEiFi cp To SE cut 61P5 The 126 doc H'veasrATC t!cudree/

Meer g A> >

Al e kod h m %.

Tesf ee O %6Tet# "Test' ttou Efeic.,

dAe c.ett Ec;r Adv TF%

det w uedt eobros. Acra 4 coq or W.s w A

t+

To d Ect UVogo m e (i ca-Pr-gg -oQ.

cot.P VWc b (lhes O

I h

9 I

O I

l

DEFICIENCY REPOR f 04 I d t-OR NUuSER + <

C AR 03f RI A flVlf Y s

00CVMENill) VIOL AT ED

.6 bld N/*.nS(A lo C NSb OGM / 72. /? W 3 DATE 085 RfV a

J ff con 0lfiON DE SCRIPflDN

()

MAGAP /2 2 Ann ^23.tbibs S & "AniwAs %),

ma.,. opp:m As sm3 ->.a'aud% n;a, r, ]d ali.ft kab /

win,u u... ~

Jeu.s fy) Adulet Mswl.Sasdu Gb/ A41dw1 Ate 7al -tmtrks (Aiu> s)

T -uhu m s G id1 & aann m/ut s >ud./uw-e.jkik dnaar -

~

% An sIrul ud db'r L' A 1 6 ARAL 1As vad cu)2sd>. A D M P > nd 5 d4 as > ? 899 st<->-#N oi_. noe(< n cJ &. ivt s. le - t -itif.e u & /.

y fw>.o i. Ancn spec-f 4! w A Ap4-wp r xn 3 r& J.

w A

REPORTE0]YOgE PHONE EX TE lON R E VIE vie O Y AT

.WDtiW vi3/n x c sw z.

.c4

%d$W

{(kSPO5lflON A55iGNED to ORG ANIZAflON IN0lV100AL

~

DUE DAIE' OAINiflAC OAlt EA/7'c)/Hf />f.fMM5

[2.9'f?

77pb / /f'f?

DISPOS 6 TION b./L b CL4' LM L

~

$0

' V CC D

E L

k SU8M fiED BY DA TE

a. % % %,g

'PPR VE?YANP@$MNIO6L

&WW bu% n.,s1 ut,11e8

/

OpiflON ACCOMPLISHED p

/

/

k #& L.

, t./ s [~$1 hA laLVM lh Y kD$

y/ 4lAd4L n < A% Age a p-pr-2 cc-mI

% s,la.eits v

vtRIFIE0 8Y, DATE Lh CA l

b e

COMME NT5 f

N

//

• Cx W

f t

A I

ADVER$E CON 0iflON PER NEO 9 01 (C51) 17 YES 1N8

[ TES NO ilGN ATURE D A TE _ N bsh

'Y

_j _

n.>..

c q

pg.-c 66 o3I ei M v,u o,<2

.1 pp a 4 z-

_ b y'~ &

(

(~)

JY VAMoat9 8LP5 a.v) ve/&

S&o

'~

m /%a&

de 1:4 pmwe.e q s/q uvAds.

__BA R

' qw/ #

/?C / - A/S -ol c.

M,. e, s 0

A c - > -tu3 c ? /

f z, 3, 5^

Si - t - R8 33 7 2, 3, 4, s', G

!JP-/-86 CoSA I

O k 4 h o l d f l,4

.AAc druW bew&, aez&r A q.Z k On, & w d c.m ta k iwJ W 4Asf AulJ.h. ChlMlou.ZAl f g& & x% -ed.a&Lsaod aa a dJoAk wt.puAap sen 3km h & a. da.f 6 t s & A.tle nU jakt &.dnLes dal M esa aw, aaao JW uzl u k a. a + y % W A -

4P s f z M b a,t> A pcs su su p% o a-er-rs -on.

a O

DEFICIENCY REPORT oR Nuvlth C 86 OSITO C

AC fivlT Y OOCUMENT(5) VIOL Af f D DATE 06)ERvig A'S AN//f&//eslafic /]<d

/*P-G AP- ) 2 2 Nr'..?

6/ff M CONotitON ot',CRif f TON I

N-G)\\,0*J2*2 b) 4A S. $

. YAAska.O 4 A _4k&//h b

i su,,-,n to,/

,a... aos, n 1.1, nm ~ ww A 2s au,a.i h d_ A ml.Ji isi...

~'

/

T t%d.um L 1As & zh wr ad Bef-ac-/-A'8-00(o smfad L f 1As /d/%s~74 si-f AesAld$

%.p-pr cc.ni. AM w L4imhAu

$ki '. A'>J 1 = OG f - 2 cn /R -1.

$s LN+u. As EL 51 71A} k us $so, Q j$

'sts Q

At.

[a.~ k ]> N SY1h i t In s fl./JJ //w) %A!lt/JL,

W G

v-j j

.j q

REPORTE0 4Y < DATE FHONE EXTEN510N RE VII' W-7 %

aLh@t2,/ ass /na2-

.?x

< 6/w IDISPO5filON AS$lGNED TO C/GANIZATIOMINOlvl0UAL DUE DA OAINITIAL DATE I ESN s4{. $U66 5

}~24*$$

~/*

- /4 S T 015PO5filON-0 l-V I

/^%

I L,'

M E

O Cv k

SU8MATTI,0 SY DATE js g/30M AFP AE

$ (.! dl%

Y'

& v 4 S $ 2.

hl'4 86 Sl W pPOS4fiON ACCOMPtl5HED

/

^ /

W fn&Js Ad Wh AA JA A&V

$ llL/

/2 (~ $

(A,. l_ n, O AFL L n:,1 Aa L,e t_

se p - m - c c-n >

~

l M/

COMMENil I

C

('n$

/Y g /t n

N_/

ADVERSE CONDITION PER NEO 9 01 (C5 l} IF YES. SN#

k!// A b C YE5 NO SIGNATURE DATE gg,

~.

he e es, m o 4

acfad g 3 f&ttu

.p4:x ;

b, ' g<eze /

'*'"~- 6 fr;g % *if F4u-A oV W m. m,. ~ 1* '* %4 Hg f

~k k(

S

+

e D &f~~r"~ % w* e 4

~

? % Lt 4%. A

&AOM & % ~ g W (cs.e,,~

a.1z. b ' '- O q Z "'# 'X 6 % = p a, y T)y Ne W 1

• d ru aecta (7"sc )9*"~, a a

on>

My

" W &m ~~

O "4x's r A m u'%.es' e

spa wR AW4' d&c4 g sj og

1. 'S Ma %

"$e > 'es-,r. b'S o/,

9 t

NONCONFORMANCE REPORT PAGE i OF 3 ONCa. e 8

.o9482.

RV o vt wo OUurT NuMasa @COM,CMNT O NUM4(R h,USCOWONENT O NUMSER bsysTIM/,UnsysTEM NUMA hRELAHD DOCUWNT,

/

Cs 1Itt 71L-C41R N/A Y f /o 2 ggy yi.gs.oz s k

ODOCUWNTs/ Coots votAfl0 TY,f D.ouwtNG @tutLDING EttvATION ROOM NO.

2n3 Ms-no a 9 /s.

U) i

' c-C p. app-n. t - it n '/ P.

Y.'N A0 8/S '* b ~ N C

@CONDIT@Ns/D(TAtts h%

T>O A

&.4;CC4 0

YO'MLW Zbt i(d.' S &Y~

/Ap%W Ouf n& Apuds,t. f AC.ukyuI ac6tcb'ed ousto uwasAd udL 4t.

cs -i-n 2. -,iz -c w* -

hDtsCIPtlNE CODE Oi Oi OC YM l

AsME,4CTION ita g

. ORIGINATOR M"

"'S OATE bENGINEERING G/'31/dS Of SPOS'IDN AsME sECTION XI LM Rt 10 W

ff/ f b rasi L rv O ;"

eo.5,0,ir>ON o.TA,ts O Riwo.

O sc.A, O Ri,Ai.

(Us,. As.ts

(

JMt. &

CA LLA.b 4

%saam.

is NCR A des 4GN CHAW.,4 DOCUM&HT7 Ovis INO e i,i w s NO.,sAoCA Co O ns s4 e,0smNsuyuTum., a m n

o.m i, us. oCu _..

,%L LW /;kr>w'a c/3fgg 601,PC,lTON A,PtovtD

,('I[/

h00ALITY CONTROL vtRLDCATCH DATE DAff ArfTil.ylL c 4.er iy /o mu> c.,s-u

@ eix A u s/CO M w Nrs '

,jAs, A waa 4 4 & s u r S Of Acs at yd r~z & &.

(o) k l

e,OnNmuv sA,n,.ON.,, CANT O ns EINO

!hb*88 1e T

o.,,

e ns. sw s.o ATu.E/ dan I

o

~

NCR CONTINUATION SHEET PAes 7_ oe d Seca.88

. 09yd 2.

,,y _.c o

Cope 0 motel /DETAALS:

O owosmoeuoeTAsts:

A & W.ik att'acLwi.xAd aa. latip up na22s</ Jo & /so.

2 "- c s /- is 1. - 2 cos x -1. JL'o,45.e Q.24 Q f t/.e /2es Md W Xut f%

m gA 310 7 psi f(n. 21.Zid aJ,.9(k AQ ;tA.z ag yf she, u.us a<ested d r fw *f 2YM osi.

i

% # w A A@ %.uaxat, - A A cc)yags w.m W aya. q L p a w s w e ~ a.e i t ~ y ~ n zo n w.t.

&.2At k.

atang.xlaa axla<1numL ualdo m nude pum 20 Me cou MW X<A A'y W $ adAlo 06'a Ase-auA.Ag4.rkd ASmr.ar do -943b.i &.to J.m. aa./ded sgtu A pa( m sg.puuua D' ss g

O A

'w M w-+n- + m m pucuu. 4 % ax.seaty %

j

NCR CONTINUATION SHEET PACE 3 W d NCR.NN

. OYU2-atvd CONotDONS/DETAES:

v i

\\

-pa J+ mm mk4 a~ls'u

\\

A.2 & & & M sd L t a &

& d & a sak 49 M6;

' A W M P '" k, &&MA l

% a & %.zh Jut; &

a

-aegai-v 4 a 4e ww.w.a.mo

@ m xM A u2th o m--t4 M

• b s m f2kw

\\

AuM &-

lO x p i muheAep-> M. g men wga sw3 a.; w.saa

~ ner n 4A

% w e & a, y xis-a. a m r t a g 6 d,

t neo sss

NONCONFORMANCE REPORT PAGE I 07.1.

6HCn. 88

. 09 4 A 3 nEv __Q n

,.o GuNiiNuMue @COwCNaNT iD NuMunG$ueCOwCNaNTiD NuMun O$YSTEM/$UyY$ TEM NUMMA bAtLATED DOCUMINT1

/

CS-I It2 7?o tyig N/A Y9/o 2-yp. cs.i-18 -o z j hDOCUMENTS/ CODES VOLATl0 TYM D. 04 AWING heUILDING ELfvATON ROOM No-('N zus ms-mo n 1 /.s.

s s"c-

)

ap-oAP.12

• 2 *tt 3 '/P.

?.?ODi AO

$5E * *.

3Y hCONDITION$iD(TAILS JA.ca.,L, u O ue q clg(w.aN aa' uw.nL t4 l'cs cold-y ff4esO Gd v044 cmfkNu A

c{.2' <* xntCfu at$2ds ti>d-Mt 44.1,d 6t*

2 440 uf,@

(,

[,$-/*// 2. ~ 7 2d ~ d //d.

bol5CIPtlNE CODE Oi Os OC TM l

O ***'] [ " $ $

65NogtE ASME SECTION til O NC A$ME $ECTCH XI I'X $AF'd A A rw,a I"z-m RECU$

""^*'

hDISPOSITION DETAILS O'asw0ex d $C,I 6 nerAin nss As.es S-

.g g alt'asA ecf A A 4AuAo

' Wi ecm'co 13 NC A DESCH CHANGE DOCUMERT?

OYt$

No hIF 16A is"NO". 85 A DCA RtousatDPC ft$

OD(SPC${ TION SUSMI D SY =/dAa N /b/7#$

ATE IF 7tS*. DCA#

M M

(. a[g{

hDf5PO51 TON APPROVED M[3[y DATE ALITY CONTRCK VERW,CATiOH DAff 5.lIs C-6-W N /A WW 6Is86

@um xs,CO Nn ' "

ym A L a.,u M &.2Ap a cPe~ wdeur 06 ncs c4l

(

W Kwt n es & a c-w'o e

im e,O m m uYs,m -,, m i e,0,,,,), E.A d 4 9/-43 O A,,

scNATu=, dan % M A

5s Om 60. m. sN, a

NCR CONTINUATION SHEET PAca 2 Os J Nca. 88

.099#4 agy _

CONCMDONS/DtTA&3:

DISPO$ MON /DETAAS:

m N

W

&k h & N. E 'A C $

• l

• l/ 2. ~ 2 5~0) K -l, & & & h A.44 g

a ACS M A M

m k Zo 3l0]fsl

& A M aud., afk &

p>u QL a' x m% x.G apd. Add k, q zYe6ssl.

lh adolo M 4.be wapeted W 2ALZat M

& M c3Jy qzha &.>

hf

, 4 4 ;ca w a w A ot q - m? "d w e oam

• A-

_m 44 wddsm & p. 2o g ug pi ut, b) m PG 06a">'"'A t

p messswx m A&""M'dton& &

W fF D O wnwem-w" mm a + sa w

NCR CONTINUATION SHEET Pace J os d_

uca.$$

. DNA4 nay.Ei n

'a CONtMDONS/DITAM:

(U OIIMm~, ap p :

- AM s Mm W,wA

.aup y p a.e, m ~ &

&M n 2.eak QMg ;

t M M&n%s

- Ak PD &O WA % A M) ad

.zia p a &

.a y p -at-se asq

-@ awwama XLLW A&px spk y

. a f *z( O %.x A c a.b ' u ] & a u b lo i

./tu M &A.

x

.A

-E O'n AR.as'ew# M A p & ~

aw ~

~

Q o u p & cf, & dis-t 4 & M Q.

l

L.

l

! E ' Brownr#Roounc.-

BQA 88-0156 O

June 8, 1988 TO:

G.R. Purdy FROM G.N. Fanning-

SUBJECT:

Unit 1 RCS Cold Hydro Test Inspection l

Inspectors were assigned to specific piping isometrics (approx. 4 to 6).

Each inspector performed preliminary inspections on those isometrics (i.e.,

base metal inspections, items complete and installed) and became familiar with his inspection responsibilities prior to test.

Isometries for which only a partial inspection was required were highlighted to distinctly identify the portions of the piping within the test-boundary. Additionally, base metal repairs and welded attachments were red-lined in on the drawings used during the test. All exterior surfaces of piping and components were examined, braba M.c.&

G.N. Fanning y

QC Supervisor CNT/bm cc QA File I

l

_c,r.wwwW g

g,-w-

,,,.,9p myy yw w e g-y y yev--

w-g - - -

r-emm--'

m-w"-'C--

m'er n

-e ws =

--*q gm_

_ww-y-*-wg-

_s,-&q w

m

h&lkXIt.k i

BQA 88-0157 O

June 8, 1988 e.

TO:

G.R. Purdy FROM:

T.L. Matheny

SUBJECT:

Unit 1 Cold Fydro RCS Test Inspection Upon issuance of the cold hydro test package, the QC Group was divided into inspection teams with each team having a team leader.

Each in-spection team was assigned specific IS0s for a specific area.

Examples Reactor Bldg. - assigned area - Compartment #2 Team Leader 3 team members 1 ANI The team leader assigned team members specific IS0s and performed a walk-down of those IS0s with members at least 3 times a week.

A 100% surface examination was performed during the pretest walkdowns O

for are strikes, base material damage, etc.

100% of the surface was examined for leakage during the performance of the pressure test.

- hW f err / L. Mathe6y

[

Doedment Review QC Review Supv.

TLM/bm cci QA File O

Mf5W BQA 88-0158 Juns 8, 1988 4

TO:

G.R. Purdf O

FROM:

L.W. Mans field

SUBJECT:

Unit 1 RCS Cold Hydro Test Inspection Inspection of the piping and components within the cold hydro test boundaries was performed utilizing marked-up (highlighted) BRPs. This information was furnished to QC by the Hydro Test Group via marked-up flow diagrams.

During actual hydro test, QCIs inspected all piping velds, mechanical joints (flanges, pipe plugs, threaded connections, etc.), valves, pipe bends, welded attachments, lines run through penetrations, and areas where base metal repairs were made.

All leaks at mechanical joints were noted and the information given to the STE.

ddAYll

$r'0' Y O

A4/

L.W. Man Id QC Insp r

LWM/bm 4

cci QA File 4

O I

f l

v,-

._..nn,-,

h7MM BQA 88-0154 June 8, 1988 TO:

G.R. Purdy FROM:

William Darby l-

SUBJECT:

Unit 1 RCS Cold Hydro Documentation Review A list of hydro boundary isometries was established. Document Review Group reviewed all outstanding documentation as the work was completed.

Upon acceptance of the documentation, packages were sent to the Hydro Status Group for status.

(Note: Hydro Status Group was part of the Document Review Group). Hydro Status Group upon notification of the hydro test, statused all isometrics until all work was complete. The status consisted of the following:

A.

All documentation in the Permanent Plant Records Vault:

B.

All documentation completed by the Document Review Group C.

Welding Engineering logs as to what type of documentation was issued on all isometric (i.e., modification MRSs, WDCs, RPSs, etc.); and D.

All NCRs issued against items on a piping isometric had been closed out.

O' As part of this status, the Hydro Status Group would note any base material repairs that required welding and location of welded permanent attachments on the piping isometric. Additionally, all ITT Grinnell and Southwest Fab vendor sketches were copied and attached to the hydro isometries.

Upon completion of these activities, incompleted items were noted on a Document Review Status form, which would list open documents, if any.

Once all documentation was accepted by the Document Review Group and statused by the Hydro Status Group, the Document Review Status form was signed by the Hydro Status Group and that isometric was made part of the hydro package.

William Darby QC Document Revi Lead WD/bm cca QA File O

hr# Root.k BQA 88-0153 June 8, 1988 h

TO:

-G.R. Purdy v

FROM, Greg Bennetzen

SUBJECT:

Unit 1 ACS Cold Hydro During the initiation of the Unit 1 Cold Hydro Package and Test, I was working in the Quality Engineering Completion and Startup Group. Our responsibility was to coordinate the hydro test with Test Engineering.

This included performing a review of the test package for acceptability (i.e., pressure, valve lineup, boundary, etc.), uark-up the applicable BRP drawings showing highlighted areas (pressure boundary, test boundary) using the flow diagrams marked-up by Test Engineering, coordinate QC doc-umentation review of the test boundary and QC pretest walkdown and the hydro test.

The Cold Hydro Test was a very large test boundary consisting of numerous BRP drawings.

Due to the size of the boundary, the BRPs were broken into groups by area.

Each group consisted of Quality Control Inspectors and an ANI, and a required number of BRPs in which their group was responsible for during the test.

QE Completion and Startup transmitted the highlighted BRPs to QC Review for review of all associated documentation and red lining

/~'

of repair areas which required welding, attachment velds, and including k

vendor drawings for vendor fabricated spools.

These BRPs became the draw-ing used during the test by QC.

A second set of highlighted BRPs was transmitted to QC for pretest walkdowr.

of the test boundary. All deficiencies were documented as applicable (NCR and Unsat irs), and a deficiency list for the Hydro Test by BRP was initiated by QC Inspection and Review, and transmitted to QE Completion and Startup, and Test Engineering for ' coordinating the closure of the deficient items.

Prior to performing the cold hydro on two separate occasions, mockup hydro tests were conducted with all QC and ANI personnel represented.

This was done to assure that QC and ANI were familiar with the inspection boundary that they were responsible for and any scaffolding or ladders for accessibility where present.

During the actual test, each group (QC Inspectors and ANI) used the high-lighted / redlines BRPs and performed an inspection of all specifically identified areas (weld, repair areas, attachment) vendor and contractor and visually inspected all exterior surfaces for leakage.

'Gre'g'Behnetzen

/

()

Quality Control Engineer GB/bm cci QA File

"s bMk

(

i June 8, 1988 BQA 88-0155 TO:

G. R. Purdy

-FROM:

• alph Darby

SUBJECT:

Unit 1 RCS Cold Hydro Documentation Review A list of hydro boundary isometrics was established. Document Review Group reviewed all outstanding documentation within the hydro boundary.

Upon acceptance of the documentation, packages were sent to the Hydro Statusing Group, to maintain an over all status of all documentation until all work was completed for each isometric drawing within the hydro boundary. -The status consisted of the following; A) All documentation in the Permanant Plant Records Vault; B) All documentation accepted by the Document Review Group; C)

'a' eld Engineering logs as to what type of documentation was issued, and or, all outstanding documentation that was not completed on all isometrics; D) All NCR's issued against isometric had been cicsed out.

In addition to the above, the Hydro Status Group noted on the isometric any base metal repairs that required welding and approximate location of permanant welded attachments. Additionally copies of all vendor fab sketches were attached to the hydro isometries which identified all vendor welds / vendor repairs that were within the hydro boundary.

After all documentation was accepted by the Document Review Group and statused by the Hydro Status Group, the Document Review Status Form was signed and the isometric was made part of the hydro package.

M _b d b_b Ralph Barby 5

QC Document Review Le id I

RD/ts cc: QA File

EXPLANATORY NOTES TO RECORDS ASSESSMENT CHECKLISTS FA O

1.

Checklists' were originally prepared during the week of May 16, 1988.

The specific date prepared and original preparer are indicated.

The information from the original checklist was t rans ferred to the typed version of the checklist on June 14,

1988, and June 15, 1988.

The individual completing the trans rer of infornation is also indicated.

2.

Many BRPs are contained in more than one of the eleven test areas.

The record assessment checklist cross references test areas in these cases.

3.

Vendor spools are identified with a

BRP number prefix followed by a sequential number.

Brown and Root spools are identified by three characters, the first being a sequential number followed by the letter "Q" and the number "1"

or "2".

4.

BRPs are the fabrication drawings for Brown and Root spa,ls.

5.

CMC is an acronym for component modification

card, a

document identifying changes not incorporated into a

BRP revision at the time of the test.

6.

Comments indicate items of interest noted during the record assessment.

O 1

PF.LSSURE DATA SHEET ATTACHt1ENT Ab PRIdTS INSFECTORS.

LEAD /ALTERNAN

~

Reactor BRP-RC-1-520-001 '

Jim Shaver L

h* a<#<'tt,M P-RC-1 -RB-045 R. A11strom A

w

\\' dy[,4.Y E 1196E51*.,

h E E-10773-101-005 *

'N

\\e o

LJ All welded joints, connections, base metal re airs involving welding, and all regions of high stress as shown on attached ISO's have been hydrostatic tested and found acceptable.

B&R 0.0.I.

N 7-f / h_

AnI s1 P, M 1-3l~27 -

O p.;. y, 7..

COLD HYDRO RECORD ASSESSMENT CHECILIST W !<,'

e's5 6 !

I Tcat Area:

Date Prepared:

f'/7'88 BRP 8 8 "/- / d *d'/f Preparer: 8/dSeve.5<v>

Was repair or attach-Was fabrication Were repair or Location of ment indi-Piping drawing (spool attachment repair or cated by Subassembly sketch) attached welds present sttachment note on No.

to test BRP?

on spool?

weld.

test BRP?

/$l Vi$

NG Uh N//

2C1 Yfi Nf

^Ya AV//

3QI YE6 Nc N!d N/A

<lGI YE6 NO N/A Nk/

GQl YES NC N///

Nb1

(, Gl Y' S NC N//]

M/d E

7G YES NO N//)

N///

~

ggL YiS NO N///

N/A Cocuents or notes identified during records assessment:

ASME N-Stamped valves contained in the test boundary were hydro tested in the vendor's shop.

OI)Ck Mb e lc lesl AAP.

Did System N-5 agree with the presence or absence of integral attachment t: olds?

YiS ca pl.ted by: M4 h-s..~

oat.:

A<v-ff Q

l

[h

'YESSURE DATUSHEET xTTACH'iENT

~

(7 j L EA )..c/ Eq / PRINTS JR G

INSPECTORS LEAD /ALTEPNo.NT

y

' e.

/~18 (q,i, f3e f

/Wr sq '

BRP-RC-1-RB-0154 Jack Henline L

as B RP-RC-1-RB-016.

Pnil Adkins

's BRP-RC-1-RB-017, #

Roy Hernendez A

B RP-RC PB -018 '/

BRP-RC-1-RB-020' SRP-RC-1-RS-021 '.

3RP-RC-1-RS-028A '.

BRP-RC-1-RB-028B.

S RP-RC-1-RB-042 '

B RP-RC RB- 046 '-

FSI-1-0122 %

FSI-1-0122-04.

SRP-RC- /- R8 - 2 6

%e Grxacc.aa nca (. " ~1 c 2, s t._

C.a m p t % v h U $

~l f2. ras-x4

. sDe e t >St -::t h _

y ed All welded joints, connections, base metal repairs involving welding, and all regions of high stress as shown on attached ISO's have been hydrostatic tested and found acceptable.

B&R Q.C.I.

[5/-[d U

bm f*<!ro m 7/1/b;2.

AHI i

t LJ

COLD HYDRO RECORD ASSESSMENT CHECILIST iTost Area:

1. 55&W/2 #/2 G

Date Prepared:

f d'-88 BRP 0 S&I~ A8 ~C/6

?

A /Ufbr*Jesevi Preparer:

Was repair or attach-Was fabrication Were repair or Location of ment indi-Piping drawing (spool attnehment repair or cated by Subassembly sketch) attached welds present attachment note on No.

to test BRP?

on spool?

weld.

test BRP?

2C-/-Ed -C/5 /

YES AT N/A MN f(-/- 18 $/r-2 YES N6 N///

N/A

/Gl YES NC N///

N/d

.2G2 YiS NC N/A N/g 3Ql YfS NC N/}

N/A

</Q)

Y E' S No N/d N/A SGI yds NC N/A Mh/

^

~

dGI VSS NO N/N N//l Cstments or notes identified during records assessment:

ASME N-Stamped valves contained in the in the vendor's shop.

test boundary were hydro tested Cmc k lll/icb l lc 75sl dab Did System N-5 agree with the presence or absence of integral attachment tolde?

Yis ce:pl3t.d by:

IMIw ~

Dat.:

4-/v-J.f n

/

v

COLD HYDR 0 RECORD ASSESSMENT CHECILIST (m,

4 ij?catArea:

he55c t /J e/2 Date Prepared:

f-/J ff BRP #

dd'/- #d -f/4 AY4 7N 4 5.w eveparer:

5 Was repair or attach-Was fabrication Were repair or Location of ment indi-Piping drawing (spool attachment repair or cated by Subassenbly sketch) attached welds present attachment note on No.

to test BRP?

on spool?

weld.

test BRP?

/R:-/~ fd- /{ - /A YfS NO Al6/

M/g L'(-/-//j- // /8 Y~5 NC A'b/

AlI//

ft'-/ -/8 - /(.

5 NC' Alf A/'Al Nh/

f(-l-/t3 - /t - 6 NC A/C N/A N/A fG/

YES NS W/A A'/A JCI Yf6 UC N/A Nl/

^

%f2 YES NO Al///

Al/d Cc:ments or notes identified during records assessment:

ASME N-Stamped valves contained in the test boundary were hydro tested in the vendor's shop.

C/11C b $ e/ k !es / A O '.

Al ce/4,y. c/le - t/is, O/c /%A Al*mlve/sf ex /Vay L ls w e-> ll M.

c y

dc /- Xd - /t -f #sd' AC-/- /6-//-4.

Did System N-F agree with the presence or absence of integral attachment colda?

YfS cacpleted by:

ifu Dat.:

4-/V-H

,O ll Y,Y

COLD HYDRO RECORD ASSESSMENT ~

CHECELIST

\\ / cat Area: /)f m v e c e /

iT t

Date Prepared:

1. -/ tdt BRP e PC-/-f -C/7 Preparer: _ //b'fi.-ci..:<vi Was repair Was fabrication Were repair or Location of ment indi-or attach-Piping drawing (spool attachment repair or cated by Subassembly sketch) attached welds present attachment note on No.

to test BRP?

on spool?

weld.

test BRP?

HC-/-fd /?- /

YfS YE 5 Shr' fsd',$rf.

,g Nc fi-/ - 2n- /7-2.

YiS YiS dh' dr 74. y go 302 Ydi NC N///

Nlp,1 WZ YES NC N/p N//)

l Cecuents or notes identified during records assessment:

ASME N-Stamped valves contained in the test boundary were hydro tested in the vendor's shop.

cmc,17 lie l l N>l dal l

l l

l l

Did Systen N-5 agree with the presence or absence of integral attachment l

Colds?

Yin cecpleted by: /d d s~ ~

Date:

6-/v-SS s

x l

COLD HYDRO RECORD ASSESSMENT CHECILIST O.

(

,3fcst Area:

h)es$d/t ed Date Prepared:

(/J-JS BRP e fc -/- /d - Cis praparer:

fro S o,,,

v Was repair or attach-Was fabrication Were repair or Location of ment indi-Piping drawing (spool attachment repair or cated by Subassembly sketch) attached welds present attachment note on No.

to test BRP?

on spool?

weld.

test BRP7 fi'.t-dd./y-/

YsS NA N/A N/i/

ft./. gg./3-Z Yc'S YfS - $th'

/97 A " V' Alc JGz Yi$

NL'

^//$

N///

sfgz Yi'S NO N/j N/A Cccuents or notes identified during records assessment:

ASME N-Stamped valves contained in the test boundary were hydro tested in the. vendor's shop.

Did System N-5 agree with the presence or absence of integral attachment colds?

YES Cccpleted by: _ /M Date:

4WY8

~~

o) s w

/ lye /c /'.2 COLD HYDRO RECORD ASSESSMENT CHECILIST fcst Area:

snv/ee/e v

Date Prepared:

1. ~'f'88 DRP 0 dC */'/28 *020 Preparer: _

A$'& fe'rsen Was repair or attach-Was fabrication Were repair or Location of ment indi-Piping drawing (spool attachment repair or cated by Subassembly sketch) attached welds present attachment note on No, to test BRP?

on spool?

weld.

test BRP?

SC -f-Ad-ZC- /

Yd$

N&

N///

A//d t?-/-Ad ZC-2 Ys$

N0 N/A N/g

//rncAixen f weid

$C-/ -fd -Zo.3 YES sc-i-ers ecc. - ccis LC-/-26-20 3 YES drAA*erf Ke' W

/2C-/ 16 - 20 3 fiS pc-/.cig.sss. ecis

/C+/d-16 3 NO

/2C-/-26 -ZC-V YES N6 N/A N/A p n d aen r for M fc-t-Ad-/C-5 yds st-/-cis ers.cy,s ft -/ 10- S YiS

~ ?t / ZC 6 YES YiS - WeP'r The e S M-3 NC

~ fC-/-fd- ?c - 7 YES Yr5 - fepir

/// M f.j j NO

\\

Cccuents or notes identified during records assessment:

ASME N-Stamped valves contained in the in the vendor's shop.

test boundary were hydro tested Tbs 0Al Abe to 0 xj'#r fnrest f W can sala,/ A /e,/ sfM AYgkrestl 4'e// fd-/-07f def CC/S cceetelrn re lrS f # < /-fr-ff c/g, Did System N-5 agree with the presence or absence of integral attachment colds?

fiS C :pleted by:

/

,... ~ -

p.g.:

g.g-gf r

/

x

$/yc lc !'E COLD HYDRO RECORD ASSESSMENT CHECELIST tcst Area:

kreuWec ed Date Prepared:

59J-ff BRP 0 Ek*- /-fd - Czo p7,p,,,7 f t j g,,._,n L.

Was repair or attach-Was fabrication Were repair or Location of ment indi-Piping drawing (spool attachment repair or cated by Subassembly sketch) attached welds present attachment note on Ms.

to test BRP?

on spool?

weld.

test BRP?

/?C -/- fd- ?c - 7 WS N&

N///

VfS - f,, )

Cccuents or notes identified during records assessment:

ASME N-Stamped valves contained in the test boundary were hydro tested in the vendor's shop.

c/Mcs atflicle<l b l!5l 8/28

/!k'!fer ff /-/u CCS -CS/k Nes nl nM A NeAlel A?*bar*sl Cm bary b re,/ a4 nele a hd at/

[bf /// Arbc at &p / post l #V Did Systen N-5 agree with the presence or absence of integral attachment tolds?

l YES I

/

Ccepleted by:

M/N-.~-

Date:

A/WSS O

l v

I

COLD HYDRO RECORD ASSESSMENT CHECILIST

-y

,) Test Area:

r& V/t e'2 Date Prepared: _

/-/S f.5 BRP #

8(~ -/- #8 -02/

Preparer: _ #b'M,,,0.~_

Was repair or attach-Waw fabrication Were repair or Location of ment indi-Piping drawing (spool attachment repair or cated by Subassembly sketch) attached welds present attachment note on No.

to test BRP?

on spool?

weld.

test BRP?

/?( -/- t'd - 2/- /

NC NO N/A

^'/N 06/- Ed-E/- L Yf6 YES-defer dfSr/Arys. [

gg fr-/-fd 2/- 3 fiS Ytf-8,n,)'-

97 m-3 as av it- / - dd-2/- C YES NC

^YA N/A 2&/ 2/ - 3 YL'S MirmAnerf fue/s' ec -/- c/S -Q'? - CSiS Ed -/*fd-f/~3

1. 0 cernents or notes identified during records assessment:

ASME N-Stamped valves contained in the test boundary were hydro tested in the vendor's shop.

d6ckmst l A e// #c-/-r/8-C0Z c3/s avere</ is re bs l CP-f'~- fC ' e/-l Did Systen N-5 agree with the presence or absence of integral attachment c3Jds?

Yi5 ccepl.ted by:

486[

Date:

4-/v-Jf o

f L.)

COLD HYDRO RECORD ASSFSSMENT_

CHECKLIST

(

Test Area:. /hes& N e4 Date Prepared:

f-6 7J BRP 0 WC-/~ dd-C[b?

Preparer: AkuSni, ss t_

Was repair or attach-Was fabrication Were repair or Location of ment indi-Piping drawing (spool attschment repair or cated by Subassembly sketch) attached welds present attachment note on No.

to test BRP?

on spool?

weld.

test BRP?

/C/

Vdi NC

^/' //

N///

20)

YCS NC A'k N/A i

3Gz YiS 4'c NAl A'/d

%9/

yds NC

^Yd N/A 50/

YES MO N///

Nl4

/

fGl YES NC N/g A/d Cscuents or notes identified during records assessment:

ASME N-Stamped valves contained in the test boundary were hydro tested in the vendor's shop.

Did System N-5 agree with the presence or absence of integral attachment t; olds ?

YES cc:pi.e.d by: x8c4 Date:

e -er-Er cL) s'

{

kye b t'E COLD RYDR0_ RECORD ASSESSMENT CHECKLIST fcat Area:

[m5dt/ e2 Date Prepared:

SVffS BRP #

/(-/ #/5'd Preparer: 4 v/E,*/c &>t._

Was repair or attach-Was fabrication Were repair or Location of ment indi-Piping drawing (spool attachment repair or cated by Subassembly sketch) attached welds present attachment note on No, to test BRP?

on spool?

weld, test BRP7

/G/

'fY6 NC A,'/d N4/

.2G/

Yii NC

/(4)

Rh/

1 3G2 YE6 NO

/////

Af//

t/G/

Vf6 N6 N///

U///

SG/

YYS NC N/A N/A 6Gz Y E' S N&

AY//

U///

7Q)

Vif NG h/t/

A/d

~

SG/

Yif N0 AYA N/A Cctments or notes identified during records assessment:

ASME N-Stamped valves contained in the test boundary were hydro tested in the vendor's shop.

Did Systen N-5 agree with the presence or absence of integral attachment colds?

Ys6 Cc pleted by:

/6 Date:

6WT8

~~

o)

(

v

j COLD RYDRO RECORD ASSESSMENT CHECKLIST

(,- ) Test Area:

/f env'aet g

V' Date Prepared:

(~/J 58 BRP 0 Yd'/*Yd*$dfd Preparer: 4 W /t'r% D t-Was repair or attach-Was fabrication Were repair or Location of ment indi-Piping drawing (spool attachment repair or cated by Subassembly sketch) attached welds present attachment note on Ns.

to test BRP?

on spool?

weld, test BRP?

96I YES RG WA N4/

/?Q/

yds A/&

"/])

N/Al Cc:ments or notes identified during records assessment:

ASME N-Stamped valves contained in the test boundary were hydro tested in the vendor's shop.

l Did Systen N-5 agree with the presence or absence of integral attachment Colds?

$6 cc:pi.e.d by: /2v.'Mi.-

Date:

4-/v-rf

/

<o) i I

l l

COLD HYDRO RECORD ASSESSMENT CHECKLIST

(

)Tcst Area:

/remf/Ee4 Date Prepared:

f-/f'SI BRP 8

/d -/~ / d ' M d U/I shm Preparer:

W Was repair or attach-Was fabrication Were repair or Location of ment indi-Piping drawing (spool attachment repair or cated by Subassembly sketch) attached welds present attachment note on No.

to test BRP?

on spool?

weld, test BRP?

J(/

Ysf NC N/)

/V,h1 Cc;ments or notes identified during records asnessment:

ASME N-Stamped valves contained in the test boundary were hydro tested in the vendor's shop.

Did System N-5 agree with the presence or absence of integral attachment colds?

YS$

CCcpleted by:

/

J

'$ ~

Date:

6-//-5'8 0

COLD HYDRO RECORD ASSESSMENT CHECKLIST

(

!fCst Area: _

r r$ 5 v #e t e/2 _

Date Prepared:

N/U BRP #

1. N-#d- #f'd

1. I6'N-wh y Preparer:

Was repair or attach-Was fabrication Were repair or Location of ment indi-Piping drawing (spool attachment repair or cated by Subassembly sketch) attached welds present attachment note on No, to test BRP?

on spool?

weld.

test BRP?

/$2 Ys6 N&

N//l

^{h ZQL Yc~5 AfD N///

/*////

i Ceteents or notes identified during records assessment:

ASME N-Stamped valves contained in the test boundary wara hydro tested in the vendor's shcp.

cDK /)l$cle k

feSb dab Did Systen N-5 agree with the presence or absence of integral attachment tolds?

'{t%

I cc pleted by:

/MC _/

Date:

d'/488 v/

1

COLD HYDRO RRCORD ASSESSMENT ~

C HECILIS T

~

(o'2 cat Area:

/r)efit Wte/L v

Date Prepared:

1. ~NYI BRP 0 f6I '/~CU Z-C/

Preparer:

K & S 9t k Was repair or attach-Was fabrication Were repair or Location of ment indi-Piping drawing (spool attachment repair or cated by Subassembly sketch) attached welds present attachment note on No.

to test BRP?

on spool?

weld.

test BRP7

/CZ YES No N/A

/

A' /

ZG2 YC6 NC YAf N/g 3G =

YES

^'&

^%)

^//d

• h Cctments or notes ids.

ied during records assessment:

ASME N-Stamped vali,

ontained in the test boundary were hydro tested in the vendor's shop.

ciN: s //hc e/ k bs/ dW Did Systen N-5 agree with the presence or absence of integral attachment colds?

ff6 ccept.t.d by:.

IM 3-Date:

• N-Sr O

COLD HYDRO RECORD ASSESSMENT CHECKLIST C\\

'(j1 cat Area:

/r)e>5t //d ei Date Prepared:

M/N BRP 0 ffE * /~ C/J2 -C'/

$5'Er'u sch Preparer:

Was repair or attach-Was fabrication Were repair or Location of ment indi-Piping drawing (spool attachment repair or cated by Subassembly sketch) attached welds present attachment note on No.

'to test BRP?

on spool?

weld.

test BRP?

/4z rcs Me N/A w&,1 2CL yTS NO

"///

N/A IGL Yif NO N///

A&/

Cccuents or notes identified during records assessment:

ASME N-Stamped valves contained in the in the vendor's shop.

test boundary were hydro tested c/p;, //h e b bGb b$f' Did System N-5 agree with the presence or absence of integral attachment tolde?

Yff cecpleted by: _

f/

Date:

4-/VM O^

/

a PRESSURE DATA SHEET ATTACHMENT.

/3)

Q AREA

<.3 PRINTS INSPECTORS LEAD /ALTERNANT Compart nt #1 -

ERP-RC-1-520-001 Anthony Patterson L

.BRP-RC-1-P3-005' J.T. Goode

\\

JR RC-1-R8-010' J. 81anscet A

r,

~. E- $ RC-1-RB-022 *

(..'. ' ~

B RP-RC-1-RS -042' B W-RC-1-RB-044' B RP-RH RB - 00 ' '

BRP-SI-1-RS-014' B RP-S I-1-RB-020' B RP-S I-1-RB-021 '

B RP-S I-1-RS-037' r\\

V FSI-1-0123

1:c " 4 c G. *Ir,57 L L s

RRC RC t-R6.c,5 \\

%^ / W Y.

fI'30Uf All welded joints, connections, base metal repairs involving welding, and all regions of high stress as shown on attached IS0's have been hydrostatic tested and found acceptable.

B&R Q.C

"[A 2bg 3[/A ANI M'

1. ' #~

p)

~* & - v u-rz u

/

COLD HYDRO RECORD ASSESSMENT CHECKLIST O

N.)TestArea: _A iu ta r fe#[5 d2 3 4 ml Y Date Prepared:

5// > hb 2

BRP e _ /24- / - C20 - 00 I Preparer: J. Deth>n. s Was repair or attach-Was fabrication Were repair or Location of ment indi-Piping drawing (spool attachment repair or cated by Subassembly

. sketch) attached welds present attachment note on No.

to test BHP?

on spool?

weld.

test BRP?

Y0) Or4 D QI Vt=C TO O FJ)A NlA IQ G \\

VEf B $ d REFA IR Ar vaEL6 ENb neA Al0 N 01 VE6

/Jo ev/A ra /A er WELD 2DG \\

lE(

Sk & KEPAIR m a pa g-p do Cotments or notes identified during records assessment:

ASME N-Stamped valves contained in the test boundary were hydro tested in the vendor's shop.

Did System N-5 agree with the presence or absence of integral attachment l

colds?ygg Ccopleted by:

h i

Date:

4////d8 6I v

l f

l l

J COLD HYDRO RECORD ASSESSMENT CHECELIST Test Area:

[bn/oY //ot ! 'I Date Prepared:

fW 18 l

8RP

• dt'-/- Ad *dCS Preparer:

/l TOE 0v9001--

Was repair or attach-Was fabrication Were repair or Location of ment indi-Piping drawing (spool attachment repair or cated by i

Subasseably

. sketch) attached welds present attachment note on No.

to test BRP?

on spool?

weld.

test BRP?

df-/-28-65-/

YU6 NC N//

N,h/

ZG/

fff NC NI'l Nhl i

3GZ Yif NC N///

N/A

'/Gz Yi6 N'

id/

N/A

$92 YES NO

/U///

N//l h

1 Cotments or notes identified during records assessment:

ASME N-Stamped valves contained in the test boundary were hydro tested in the vendor's shop.

Did System N-5 agree with the presence or absence of integral attachment colds?

WS Ccepleted by:

b' Date:

d'/V'88 os

/

v

COLD HYDRO RECORD ASSESSMENT CHECKLIST I

fast Area:

/W %I Date Prepared:

1. -41f BRP 0

/EN -/ A'd - G/O Preparer:

A$VNn;sueru Was repair or attach-Was fabrication Were repair or Location of ment indi-Piping drawing (spool attachment repair or cated by Subassembly sketch) attached welds present attachment note on No.

to test BRP?

on spool?

weld.

test BRP?

/G/

YES No N///

l NXf JGI YMS l

NC NM A6/

SQl YES i

Mf N/A N///

Cccuents or notes identified during records assessment:

ASME N-Stamped valves contained in the test boundary were hydro tested in the vendor's shop.

Did System N-5 agree with the presence or absence of integral attachment colds?

Y5S ceapleted by: IM

~~

Date:

4 -/v-5'8 o

j

COLD HYDRO RECORD ASSESSMENT CHECKLIST

(

Test Area: d'm//h' //est!

Date Prepared:

IW '88 BRP 8 d -/'#d-822 Preparar:

[4t'N'E9cssm Was repair or attach-Was fabrication Were repair or Location of ment indi-Piping drawing (spool attachment repair or cated by Subassembly sketch) attached welds present attachment note on No.

to test BRP?

on spool?

weld, test BRP?

ff /-fg.27-f YfS Y'if -

Wef fee c //=4' d-/

NC ff-/-dd Z Yif NC N///

N/,y

&-/-d/ ?

YfS AfD N///

N///

d i -

Tse e ffa> -t en Al-/- id-ZZ - Y YH Yi$- W,ephr eg./. g. ces NO 2

Cocuents or notes identified during records assessment:

ASME N-Stamped valves contained in the test boundary were hydro tested in the-vendor's shop.

Did System N-5 agree with the presence or absence of integral attachment t:olde?

1'f6 cc pleted by:

/I

%~

i oste:

4-//-88 oJ a

~

l

COLD HYDRO RECORD ASSESSMENT C HECI L IS T_

1 Gat Area: _ [md# ee'!

Date Prepared:

1. 4 87 8RP e

&~/-Ad -C'/?-

pr,p,7,7: __ /df gy,,,,,_

Was repair or attach-Was fabrication Were repair or Location of ment indi-Piping drawing (spool attachment repair or cated by Subassembly

. sketch) attached welds present attachment note on No.

to test BRP?

on spool?

weld, test BRP?

/Q2 Y56 M

N/A N/A' Cocuents or notes identified during recorus assessment:

ASME N-Stamped valves contained in the test boundary were hydro tested i., the vendor's shop.

Did Systen N-5 agree with the presence or absence of integral attachment t:alds?

YES Cecpleted by:

(

w" Date:

d-/V-88 O

COLD HYDRO RECORD ASSESSMENT CHECILIST t

Test Area:

[#mAfr rmsf l

Date Prepared:

5~/VUN BRP

• SC-hsd-CP/

Preparer: /b kr9ukr Was rapair or attach-Was fabrication Were repair or Location of ment indi-Piping drawing (spool attachment repair or cated by Subassembly

.shetch) attached welds present attachment note on No.

to test BRP?

on spool?

weld.

test BRP?

/db Yd6 NO UlA NfA ZGZ WS NO

^M' kb/

.fG2.

W6 MO NN N///

%?2-VfS NO

^!k M/4 i

Cocuents or notes identified during records assessment:

ASME N-Stamped valves contained in the test boundary were hydro tested in the vendor's shop.

Did System N-5 agree with the presence or absence of integral attachment trolds?

Ys' 6 Completed by:

</

Date:

M/V8f O

l O

i COLD HYDRO RECORD ASSESSMENT CHECELIST Tcat Area: [ nAv!aor [ 9 Date Prepared:

I'/4 JJ BRP #

8 # '/- M 8 -d8/-

Preparer:

/ d b 65o 9

Was repair or attach-Was fabrication Were repair or Location of ment indi-Piping drawing (spool attachment repair or cated by Subassembly sketch) attached welds present attachment note on No.

to test BRP?

on spool?

weld.

test BRP?

fH-/-28 -d/ - /

ffS NO A////

pi//

/EH-l-/d-C/ - 2 YES l

A/O N/A

/////

$0/

YsS

^/0 Af//

/VA fG2 ffS A/C N///

g/)

l Cotments or notes identified during records assessment:

ASME N-Stamped valves contained in the test boundary ydro tested i

in the vendor's shop.

TAis ddf n /?l2o i4 Sinf /8-i Did System N-5 agree with the presence or absence of integral attachment wolda?

YES Cocpleted by:

(/i Date:

6 4 -88 l3 l

V l

COLD HYDRO RECORD ASSESSMENT CHECELIST b ) Test vndN! den Area:

c Date Prepared: _

1. '/6 -88 BRP #

57-/- #d-O/Y Preparer: __ / #d>%'re m Was repair or attach-Was fabrication Were repair or Location of ment indi-Piping drawing (spool attachment repair or cated by Subassembly sketch) attached welds present attachment note on No.

to test BRP?

on spool?

weld.

test BRP?

/()/

Y6S Nb N//)

N/){

d{}/

YES NO N/}/

N/d W

i Cotments or notes identified during records assessment:

ASME N-Stamped valves contained in the test boundary were hydro tested in the vendor's shop.

t l

l Did Systen N-5 agree with the presence or absence of integral attachment i

colds?

Yi$

Cnapleted by:

/

Date:

4-//88 O

/

G 1

COLD HYDRO RECORD ASSESSMENT _

CHECELIST Test Area: [rwMr us!'/

Date Prepared:

M/4 -SI BRP # _ SI-/-#d-420 Preparer:

4Ivdv%w>

Was repair or attach-Was fabrication Were repair or Location of ment indi-Piping drawing (spool attachment repair or cated by Subassembly sketch) attached welds present attachment note on No.

to test BRP?

on spool?

weld.

test BRP?

/()/

yds NO N///

Mb/

JGI YtrS No N/A M41 3G/

Y6S No NO

^'/A 401

'fdS "O

N///

"A4 Cocuents or notes identified during records assessment:

ASME N-Stamped valves contained in the test boundary were hydro tested in the vendor's shop.

l i

Did Systen N-5 agree with the presence or absence of integral attachment tolds?

l YES Caupleted by: _

Date:

4-//-88 O

COLD HYDRO RECORD ASSESSMENT CHECKLIST

_ h / * ><<t ! " I Test Area:

Date Prepared:

5'N' f8 BRP 0

$ Z-/- A d CL/

Preparer:

/kVbrycSc.

1 Was repair or attach-Was fabrication Were repair or Location of ment indi-Piping drawing (spool

' attachment repair or cated by Subassembly sketch) attached welds present attachment note on No.

to test BRP?

on spool?

weld, test BRP?

$0/

YES NO

/V/A

/Vhl

//0)

YES NO Nk/

^h Cetzents or notes identified during records assessment:

ASME N-Stamped valves contained in the test boundary were hydro tcieted in the vendor's shop.

% Mr.rf well> m suff kysbs Inna by.

/tt sep dso mus' in G,y, be.J " y Did System N-5 agree with the presence or absence of integral attachment tsolde?

YES Cacpleted by:

M//

Date:

4'/V-57 O

/

G

1 l

//7fe lolE-0 COL; HYDRO RECORD ASSESSMENT CHECELIST fset Area: [c'm/dr 4/m

• /

Date Prepared:

8-/4 88 BRP 0 SI-/-f8- #37 Preparer: ///Ukr*JcSen _

Was repair or attach-Was fabrication Werc (epair or Location of ment indi-Piping drawing (spool attacament repair or cated by Subassembly sketch) attached welds present attachusnt note on No.

to test BRP?

on spool?

weld, test BRP?

2n-SZ-/-fd g Yss Y6 S - M p w fns'Aq z/

No S

//mch-enf weid SI-/-28-37-t yds sr-t-ios o// -crzR STW/d-37 4 YES SE-/-fB -37.3 Vf6 No N/A

^//A SI-/-18-37 '/

/tC NC N/A N///

H/7AcAmf Weis' SI-/ 3 7-S' YES 3; /-/19-cc8-c< tis SZ-/-fd-37-C Yss SI-/- A8-37'f YE6 f*/ 5. ef.'fy,&

S /-t g.3 7 - g y;S

~

E-/ 37-6 YES

%S- /6,5s5 ff,"_,'lG '"

sic 7GI Y E' S

't/0 N/4 N/A Cocuents or notes identified during records assessment:

ASME N-Stamped valves contained in the test boundary were hydro tested in the vendor's shop.

82/ iflSc? ccmcre<lin Gewf lC-A/, g's/]s en SE-/-/26 - 37 '/. P< r si'c~ l Du j' % -

l l

l Did System N-5 agree with the presence or absence of integral attachment c:olde?

y' tis 1

Carpleted by:

/f/

Date:

4-/F-f8 p

(-)

/

l i

\\

1 hype /c [2-COLD _ HYDRO RECORD ASSESSMENT CHECKLIST O

bmAry!#/ew!'/

T

(,/ set Area:

Date Prepared:

S'/CS8 BRP 0 ST-/- A0- 9.37 kUSrs s'y Preparer:

Was repair or attach-Was fabrication Were repair or Location of ment ind' Piping drawing (spool attachment repair or cated by Subassembly sketch) attached welds present attachment note on No.

to test BRP?

on spool?

weld.

test BRP?

$02-YES

^l0 N//,1

^// /

1 Connents or notes identified during records assessment:

ASME N-Stamped valves contained in the in the vendor's shop.

test boundary were hydro tested l29 Abo

$recf' cct:cre

/M t

Did Systen N-5 agree with the presence or absence of integral attachment colds?

'fff A

Cacpleted by:

J

<d Date: _

4-/V-8f a

~/

J

COLD HYDRO RECORD ASSESSMENT CHECKLIST Tcst Area: Ow/W ///o/

Date Prepared:

1. -4 88 8RP e FfZ -/-c/23 pr,p,7,7:

//d5,,;wu Was repair or attach-Was fabrication Were repair or Location of ment indi-Piping drawing (spool attae.hment repair or cated by Subassembly sketch) attached welds present attachment note on No.

to test bhp?

on spool?

weld.

test BRP?

/G2.

WS

/VO N/A

^{lh!

w Cetments or notes identified during records assessment:

ASME N-Stamped valves contained in the test boundary were hydro tested in the vendor's shop.

Did System N-5 agree with the presence or absence of integral attachment f.: olds?

WS

-1 C Npleted by: -

[

M Date:

d'//'88

'(J

/

COLD HYDRO RECORD ASSESSMENT CHECKLIST Oon/* am !"/

Tset Area:

Date Prepared:

8-/4-8f BRP 0

/EC-/-Ad*03/

Preparer: f/V5rss Was repair or attach-Was fabrication Were repair or Location of ment indi-Piping drawing (spool attachment repair or cated by Subassembly sketch) attached welds present attachment note on No.

to test BRP?

on spool?

weld.

test BRP?

bGl YE6 /MA-/2S73S MO N//(

N/kf 7Gl yES/wat-itsiss No n/A N/A 8G/

YES/M/t-//f?Jb AfD N/A Nl//

9Q/

YfS/MA-/25735 NC N///

n///

O Cctments or notes identified during records assessment:

ASME N-Stamped valves contained in the test boundary were hydro tested in the vendor's shop.

Did System N-5 agree with the presence or absence of integral attachment colds?

Yss Cetpleted by:_

~~

Date:

d'/V-88 0

~l

i

• w V,

e'N PRESSURE DATA SHEET ATTACHMENT AREA PRINTS INSPECTORS LEAD /ALTERNANT Compartment

1. 2 BRP-RC-1-520-001' Wavne Mansfield L

BRP-RC-1-RB-044' Ted Neely

- BRP-SI-1-RB-016*

J. Butler A

BRP-SI-1-RB-025' BRP-SI-1-RB-039' BRP-SI-1-RB-054*

BRP-SI-1-RB-059'

. BRP-WP-1-RB-005A' FSI-1-0123 -

Ef~~ A10 G 'l4 57 3 S v

e. ep. Re.l-Rd,.c A 3 s t.

/ ac t i fl l 3rh t.

h 4...e,, *-

All welded joints, connections, base metal repai s involv

, and all regions of high stress as shown on attached I ave been hydrostatic l

tested and found acceptable.

B6R Q.C.I.

M

[-8/"d2.

ANI t P. ~Aui.

1-31-17

\\

O

COLD HYDRO RECORD ASSESSMRNT CHECILIST

(

/ Test Area: _ b/h eMl!

Date Prepared:

8-/768 BRP #

It" -/-#8 -de/#

Preparer: I / v d rv, y, n._

Was repair or attach-Was fabrication Were repair or Location of ment indi-Piping drawing (spool attachment repair or cated by Subassembly sketch) attached welds present attachment note on No.

to test BRP?

on spool?

weld, test BRP?

SGZ-VES NC N/A N/d 602 YES NO N/AI N/I/

7GZ YES NO N/A N/A 5'O2.

Yf6 NO N///

N/,f Uctments or notes identified during records assessment:

ASME N-Stamped valves contained in the test boundary were hydro tested in the vendor's shop.

1

(

Did System N-5 agree with the presence or absence of integral attachment colds?

vs' S Cecpleted by:

Date:

4-//-88 O

/

\\ G l

l

i COLD HYDRO RECORD ASSESSMENT CHECILIST

)TsetArea: [<:'?rA* !/&a!

Date Prepared:

5-085 BRP O SE-/~ Ad~0/h Preparer:

/$/UbrWs&t--

Was repair or attach-Was fabrication Were repair or Location of ment indi-Piping drawing (spool attachment repair or cated by Subassembly sketch) attached welds present attachment note on No.

to test BRP?

on spool?

weld.

test BRP?

/6'Z (C$

NO N//)

Nff 20/

WS N0

"/A

"d tusschamt new 3G/

V'E 6 sr-/ vet-ec3 cgis 3GI VCS YQ/

VfS NO N/A N/A SUz.

YES ND

"/d

^VA w

Cotments or notes identified during records assessment:

ASME N-Stamped valves contained in the test boundary were hydro tested in the vendor's shop.

l I

Did System N-5 agree with the presence or absence of integral attachment c: olds?

W6 l

CsOpleted by:

/M CW Date:

8 4 -88' l

l

COLD HYDRO RECORD ASSESSMENT CHECKLIST I

[q//h etw!'l-

' Test Area:

kJ Date Prepared:

f-/6 '88 BRP e SE-/- #d-N6 Preparer:

d9 4 A Was repair or at tach-Was fabrication Were repair or Location of ment indi-Piping drawing (spool attachment repair or cated by Subassembly

. sketch) attached welds present attachment note on No.

to test BRP?

on spool?

weld.

test BRP?

4'd/

ViS N&

N/A

/V///

54'I

_ YES NC N///

N/s1 60/

YiS MC N/A A/'//

//G/

YES NO N/A

/////

Cornents or notes identified during records assessment:

ASME N-Stamped valves contained in the test boundary were hydro tested in the vendor's shop.

Did System N-5 agree with the presence or absence of integral attachment c: olds?

%'S Cocpleted by:

/M Date:

d-//-88

L COLD HYDRO RECORD ASSESSMENT i

CHECKLIST h/d/!#/M #[

l test Area:

Date Prepared:

f-//-88 BR" #

M-/- 88 -#97 Preparer:

4 N /~1</cr m e

Was repair or attach-Was fabrication Were repair or Location of ment indi-Piping drawing (spool attachment repair or cated by Subassembly sketch) attached welds present attachment note on No to test BRP?

on spool?

weld.

test BRP?

//7pkfinnr/' WeM 51-/28-39 2 VES g.i.isy.so7. gee Sr-i-Eg.39.z vys pts #chne,/ weis' St -/ -Ad-I'/- 3 YES gr.i. isy.ai. ew S S7./.gg.39 3 fgS

$Z-/ 3 9 - 4 n!S A/0 N/A N/A

$Z-/ 39-3 Yi$

A*S - 8

v' f

hff NO

/

ze n

U consents or notes identified during records assessment:

ASME N-Stamped valves contained in the test boundary were hydro tested in the. vendor's shop.

dLP abc awe,v l m Genf /C -

Did System N-5 agree with the presence or absence of integral attachment c: olds?

[55 Cenpleted by:

/d 2#

Date:

4'/9'88

/

n f

b

COLD HYDRO RECORD ASSESSMENT _

CHECILIST

(

test Area: [an/N M

Nm Date Prepared:

5'//48 BRP #

SI-/-fd'05'l Preparer: ll/U fe'r9 4 %

Was repair Was fabrication Were repair or Location of ment indi-or attach-Piping drawing (spool attachment repair or cated by Subassembly sketch) attached welds present attachment note on No.

to test BRP?

on spool?

weld.

test BRP?

SE-/ SV-/

YYS

^/C

^/N1

^'N/

a SI- /-sZd-SV-z.

fis MS-2 *m 9

& W7

^/0 flhehwf a'e/d SI-/-fd-CV-Z f66

.st-/- 09c -w7 -cy/5 SE-/~Ed-5Y-L YES 3CL YES

^%1

^////

VG/

ViS No N/d N/A

(%

QJ Cotments or notes identified during records assessment:

ASME N-Stamped valves contained in the test boundary were hydro tested in the vendor's shop.

64'/ Abc Sof carrr M

Did Systen N-5 agree with the presence or absence of integral attachment t:olde?

YES

.I Ceapleted by: _

e~

Date:

4 /V-88 Q

v

COLD HYDRO RECORD ASSESSMENT CHECILIST (j)tsat Area: b/

///M 7-Date Prepared:

f-//-88 BRP 0 SS-l~Ed '059 Preparer: __ Ylb'kvci d'L Was repair or attach-Was fabrication Were repair or Location of ment indi-Piping drawing (spool attachment repair or cated by Subassembly

.kstch) attached welds present attachment note on e

1 Mo.

to test BRP?

on spool?

weld.

test BRP?

gt/p4,w<t nc/d 32,-/- Ad-59-C/

y2S fr./-/go. cog.cpk SE-/-//d-59-d/

YES

-feja1a S I-/- $ b~ $9'$ Z-Y6~$

YES k/W-d/~ Rd-f-/

NC 3Q/

YiS N0 N/A y/g VQI y'fS No N/A p,/4 SGL-YfS No N/A N/A

//11.>c 4.n sri n W d' SI-/-28-59 -C/

YES Sz-/-/So a7-cws SI-/-Ed C9-O' YES ha Consents or notes identified during records assessment:

ASME N-Stamped valves contained in the test boundary were hydro tested in the vendor's shop.

Did System N-5 agree with the presence or absence of integral attachment t2 olds?

Yff Cecpleted by:

M W"

Date:

1. /V-88 c

e

COLD HYDRO RECORD ASSESSMENT CHECELIST 6g/* m1 fGst Area:

Date Prepared:

b /?-88 BRP #

d'Y~/-YA <d GI Preparer: / W k k-9* Sk+1-_-

Was repair or attach-Was fabrication Were repair or Location of ment indi-Piping drawing (spool attachment repair or cated by Subassembly sketch) attached welds present attachment note on No.

to test BRP?

on spool?

weld, test BRP?

N/ -/ CS-/

A/O NO N/A A/'d AG/

YS l

NO N/A A/' //

.3G/

fsS NO N/A N///

('h NY Cerments or notes identified during records assessment:

ASME N-Stamped valves contained in the test boundary were hydro tested in the vendor's shop.

Af /s/f m NP -/-La -dC- / P<'r S*l *'

M*

t Did System N-5 agree with the presence or absence of integral attachment colds?

YiS 1

Ccepleted by:

"O Date:

6 8-87

<vm i

COLD HYDRO RECORD ASSESSMENT l

CHECKLIST TGst Area:.?nniyW mat E-

/

Date Prepared:

$~/f' ES BRP $

fdf-/~0/Z 3 Preparer: /flUbr9efsn Was repair or attach-Was fabrication Were repair or Location of ment indi-Piping drawing (spool attachment repair or cated by Subassembly sketch) attached welds present attachment note on No.

to test BRP?

on spool?

weld.

test BRP?

ZG2-Yf' S M

^%I

^/' //

J

/~()'

Cetments or notes identified during records assessment:

ASME N-Stamped valves contained in the test boundary were hydro tested in the vendor's shop.

1 Did System N-5 agree with the presence or absence of integral attachment colds?

YES Ccapleted by:

+a' "

n Date:

4-//'88 U

/

l

COLD HYDRO RECORD ASSESSMENT CHECKLIST Test Area:

1. M aes t 2-Date Prepared:

fd/ 88 BRP 0 d-/-dd -053 pr,p,,,p,,&,3,,,,,

Was repair or attach-Was fabrication Were repair or Location of ment indi-Piping drawing (spool attachment repair or cated by Subassembly sketch) attached welds present attachment note on No.

to test BRP?

on spool?

weld, test BRP?

8G/

WSlAtL//f735 N/A Y/l Cotments or notes identified during records assessment:

ASME N-Stamped valves contained in the test boundary were hydro tested in the vendor's shop.

Did System N-5 agree with the presence or absence of integral attachment colds?

WS cocpleted by:

/

/

u. "

Date:

4-N'88 p)

~/

o

PRESSURE DATA SHEET ATTACHMENT

/

'T AREA PRINTS

!!iSPECTORS LEAD /ALTEPSANT LJ Compartrent d3 BRP-RC-1-520-001-Helinda Holder L

BRP-RC-1-RB-008' Charles Swindell B RP-RC-1-RB-044 :

J. Cole A

BRP-SI-1-RB-017-B RP-S I RB-026 -

BRP-SI-1-RS-027 BRP-S I-1-RE -C40'.

B RP-S I RS -053 '

BRP-SI-1 RS-060 *-

FSI-1-0123e dS. /-g g-o ffg.

gr.c._ c. % m ( % \\ GAc\\

REF:p1ee.K I2 5]?, s' B G K 0 1 %,'c 3 2 w i y ef ld < :s O All welded joints, connections, base metal repairs involving welding, and all regions of high stress as shown on attached IS0's have been hydrostatic tested and found acceptable.

BbRQ.C.!.hsb J NA:5/d

/

Nil

's e.#Si/

fby o

/

%-.~....--..

i COLD HYDRO RECORD ASSESSMENT CHECKLIST Area:/duperfMersf d fast Date Prepared:

M/0MB BRP O M - / ~/26 ' 00 9 Preparer:

J. De&m o Was repair or attach-Was fabrication Were repair or Location of ment indi-Piping drawing (spool attachment repair or cated by Subassembly sketch) attached welds present attschment note es No, to test BRP?

on spool?

weld, test BRP?

/ C/

VES A/ 0 M/t N//S 26/

YES NO NfR A}//?

df &

30f

}/ES

/2EFA/A A7~fd22A A/6 YGs

^10 N/n M/n yes ido ajn ala V

Cotments or notes identified during records assessment:

ASME N-Stamped valves contained in the test boundary were hydro tested in the vendor's shop.

Did System N-5 agree with the presence or absence of integral attachment tolds? [65 Cecpleted by:

bl Date:

0

/

8 O

COLD HYDRO RECORD ASSESSMENT CHECILIST_

[G'Tast Area:du/arfweld 3 Date Prepared:

f//v /e'G' BRP # /24 -/- A/ - O YY Preparer: J Ddca /s Was repair or attach-Was fabrication Were repair or Location of ment indi-Piping drawing (spool attachment repair or cated by Subassembly sketch) attached welds present attachment note on No.

to test BRP?

on spool?

weld.

test BRP?

9o z ves Js a/n iv/A

/002 JES NO A/A N/A ll0 L YES

^IO N/A d/h 1 2. 0 t

)'ES do N/A M/A-h Cctments or notes identified during records assessment:

ASME N-Stamped valves contained in the test boundary were hydro tested in the andor's shop.

i Did Systen N-5 agree with the presence or absence of integral attachment colds?)gg Cecpletqdby:krb h

6!//[88 Datet o

9 V

COLD __ HYDRO RECORD ASSESSMENT CHECILIST Tca t Area : dage r htM d 3

%j Date Prepared: _ T [ G /8 6' BRP O SE - / ~ A 8 - CH 2 Preparer:. r) /k/ Eon is Was repair or attach-Was fabrication Were repair or Location of ment indi-Piping drawing (spool attachment repair or cated by Subassembly sketch) attached welds present attachment note on No, to tert BRP?

on apool?

weld.

test BRP?

is 2 ycs a0 sh pla 2Ql YE3

^l0 AJ/A Njb4 Airnuimewr 30I Y65 bes. Sr-,. to z.00 3 c. tis 30i VE*C 40I YE6 AEA41/2 AT n/CLD /9 hl0 dtA Td ?-

MS Al O M/A

/V/A 0)

G' Cocuents or notes identified during records assessment:

ASME N-Stamped valves contained in the test boundary were hydro tested in the vendor's shop.

-2

f. M c. S AVA ( RED w

TEST BR P.

Did Systen N-5 agree with the presence or absence of intearal attachment trolds ?

gg Ceepleted by: db d!'Y!88 Date:

C/

O V

COLD HYDRO RECORD ASSESSMENT CHECELIST tost Area: MM4a r[W/id (3 Date Prepared:

I

• b8 BRP # 57-/-/26-024 Preparer: s/> De'/ht e s Was repair or attach-Was fabrication Were repair or Location of ment indi-Piping drawing (spool attachment repair or cated by Subassembly sketch) attached welds present attachment note on No.

to test BRP?

on spool?

weld.

test BRP?

JGI

?/ES

^l0

^!/A l

N/A I

Cccuents or notes identified during records assessment:

ASME N-Stamped valves contained in the test boundary were hydro tested in the vendor's shop.

Did System N-5 agree with the presence or absence of integral attachment colds?

E5 Cetpleted by: N b/

Date:

4 /!88 (m

si

\\

COLD HYDRO RECORD ASSESSMENT CjiECK L IS T fast A rea: [zw At / f htend 3 Date Prepared:.f/0/de BRP # SJ-/-Nd -d 2 7 Preparer: d UFOsM /S Was repair or attach-Was fabrication Were repair or Location of ment indi-Piping drawing (spool attachment repair or cated by Subassembly sketch) attached welds present attachment note on No.

to test BRP?

on spool?

weld.

test BRP?

I 10i VES l

nio M/n I

2/A 2C)I l'ES I

Alo N/A N/A i

3Ql yc5 i

sio i

gik l

g/g

%)I

/E5 Alo N/)

1. /4

_30l

)'ES AJO N/A N/4 I,

1 O

(j.

l l

Cccuents or notes identified during records assoassent:

ASME N-Stamped valves contained in the test boundary were hydro t9sted in the vendor's ebop.

l l

l i

l i

l Did System N-5 agree with the presence or absence of integral attachment colds? }fg3 1

Cocpleted by:

wb

/!//!OS l

Date:

U("'

V

COLD BYDRO RECORD A3SESSMENT (3

CRECKLEST 4.,s'cos t A r e a : /j a; 4a r [n'/ r' C f.

Date Prepared:

Ejv >' 5 L' RRP 0 ST-t-RA-CVO Preparer:. v! N/h.s o s Was repair or attach-Was fabrication Were repair or Location of ment indi-Piping drawing (spoci attachment repair or cated by Subassembly sketch) attached welds present attachment note on No.

to test BRP?

on spool?

weld, test BRP?

Sr-i-il 6 -o'io - '

Vcs

,Jo a/n gik Sr 1 -f 6 ' C# *

• Y'CS (U b N/A ty/n sv -na-'s 3 ycs m

l4 N4 I

t Cetments or noces identified during records assessment:

ASME N-Stemped valves contained in the test boundary were hydro tested in the vendor's shop.

~ flus 8Af /5 f L60 coVcVfk /A f0"/0 !C l

l

[

1 l

l

[

Did Systen N-6 wgree with tha presence or absence of integral attachment l

colde?

/E5 Cacpleted by: M Ahkh=

Date:

6 /d/

/

d8 1

l

+

COLD HYDRO RECOND ASSESSMENT CHECILIST

(

tost A r e a : [cupa th+itn d 3 Date Prepared:

5//Gb 3 SRP 0

.ST-t-/28 -0 5 3 Preparer: l' ads 0'1/5 Was repair or attach-Was fabrication Were repair or Location of ment indi-Piping drawing (spool attachment repair or cated by Subassembly sketch) attached welds present attachment note on No, to test BRP?

on spool?

weld.

test BRP?

I Sz-i-re8 - O s 3 -f

'/c 6

^10 g/A l

b/A l

x,r S i - > R8 o G 3 ~ 2.

VES k h49.4 ut n )(R S t e r.( eul pre p A/O dOl VES NO N/i1 h

N/G n)

Q, Cccuents or notes identified during records assessment:

ASME N-Stamped valves contained in the test boundary were hydro tested in the vendor's shop.

t M O A rrn ct+EO 7'b 7Zrs r Stat

• 77ti$ y l' sS A-t. Scs Co VER t~D J^! 6'2*Uf ID Did System N-5 agree with the presence or absence of integral attachment t; olds?yES CCCpleted by:

• b%

Date:

6//f/#9 O

/

v

COLD RYDRO RECORD ASSESSMENT CHECKLIST

("%

(V).'ost Area: Ax1 Ar /lWilt 3_

Date preparea: _ r/c/gg BRP 0

.5 7 - / ~ /2 8 - Q L; o Preparer: ). Ot'O M iG Was repair or attach-Was fabrication Were repair or Location of ment indi-Piping drawing (spool attachment repair or cated by Subassembly sketch) attached welds present attachment note on No, to test BRP?

t on spool?

weld.

test BRP7 4/r/ScN/H6% 7 Sr-i-ne -cw - /

t)ES ya sr-i. isi ocq.cwg sr-i -n uo - ' i

)'E5 i

st -i -es -c 6 0 - 2.

VE6 i B/K itcMut A r det0 io in i n'a I

Jo/

K=s

^!O N4 l

N/A WI YES alo iv/n n/A Sd 2.

VES No n/A iv/A i

l l

Cccuents or notes identified during records assessment:

i l

ASME N-Stamped valves contained in the test boundary were hydro tested in the vendor's shop.

l l

Did System N-5 agree with the presence or absence cf integral attachasut t; olds?

gg CCGpletedby:h,d Date: M

!b b O

l

COLD HYDRO RECORD ASSESSMENT CHECKLIST s'on t Area: _ brupar f Min { ]

Date Prepared: _ S/! Oldil s_-

BRP

• FST /- o / 2 3 Preparer: l Me'86 7 / s Was repair or attach-Was fabrication Were repair or Location of ment indi-Piping drawing (spool attachment repair or cated by Subassembly sketch) httached welds present attachment note on No, to test BRP?

e on spool?

weld.

test BRP?

\\

i

^10 N/A iv/h 3 Q 2-Ycc i

l i

l l

l i

i I

Cocuents or notes identified during records assessment:

ASME N-Stamped valves contained in the test boundary were hydro tested in the vendor's shop.

Did System N-5 agree with the presence or absence of integral attachment colds? y.g Cecpleted by: - bbLh Date:

6 6

COLD HYDRO RECORD ASSESSMENT CHECKLIST fcst Area: /$*#d/[*f /t b 8 Date Prepared:

C/ e r'd u BRP

• AG -/-4 8 'd 3 2--

Preparer: _d de/.}oei 6 Was repair or attach-Was fabrication Were repair or Location of ment indi-Piping drawing (spool

' attachment repair or cated by Subassembly sketch) attached welds present attachment note on No.

to test BRP?

i

',,taol?

weld.

I test BRP?

I I

b OI 1/c3 NO N/R n//)

9C/

M5 ND AMA

/U//?

10 0 I YE(

10 0 l

^I/A N/A J/ 0I k'E<

I

^)0 Al//%

l Ab?

l t

i O

i LJ

(

Cecuents or notes identified during records assessment:

ASME N-Stamped valves contained in the test boundary were hydro tested in the vendor's shop.

~ LEY Nd/2

/ 2, D 3 5,

rHis 8/t f

.u k S db 7~ Avc/aded in fMC er<g m a l 7es t /.+cxAG r - pu2 Dispo ss rvento itec epC m is BEcnuse 5,so h w /TLG 6/to.Jad o^J A^/07?tOL Dt+'Wtj Did System N-5 agree with the presence or absence of integral attachment colds? yc5 Cccpleted by: bb NO Date:

6 MW88

' t)

[

V

..,... n

.c----.=~

~i r

s PRES.,URE DATA St.EET ATTACHMENT O,

AREA PRINTS IfdDECTORS LEAD / ALTE R:: A'iT Compartment 84 B RP-RC-1-520-001 '

Terry Matheny L

h.S$

BRP-PC-1-RB-006 '~ 2 6: C';f fin

. BRP-RC-1-RS-020' -

D. Doyle A

BRP-RC-1-RB-026 - 6. TA800 M 5 4-BRP-RC-1-RB-042 -

BRP-RC-1-RB-044 -

BRP-RH-1-R8-002 -

. BRP-SI-1-RB-013. -

SRP-51-1-RB-021. -

BRP4 SI-1-R8-022 * -

SRP-S I RB-033 ' -

BRP-SI-1-R3-038A, ERP-SI-1-RB-0385 -

BRP-WP-1-RS-003 FSI-1-0123-

!*T ri '? 'k S ?3 5 P ic. PL 1. R t!- c2 a Lt< i se +440 t.

All welded joints, connections, base metal repairs involvkg hTg..(gdi all regions of high stress as shown on attached 159 4',e h

st tic tested and found acceptable.

'4f',W "3 )

'r q.

\\

7'Y,I 8h

7 BAR Q.C.I.

,/.

~

.(

/

COLD HYDRO RECORD ASSESSMENT CHECILIST

/\\

(

? cst Area: IeMM/f e4f fX/f Date Prepared: - 6// 7 /dB BRP 0 /2C * /~ A8 ' 00 &

Preparer:

<J l)fl}< m i <>

Was repair or attach-Was fabrication Were repair or Location of ment indi-Piping drawing (spool attachment repair or cated by Subassembly sketch) attached welds present attachment note on Ns.

to test 3RP?

on spool?

weld.

test BRP?

ft /-24-co6 -)

ygg f,

83lj}

fjjA ECsI YG S do d}A d/A 3 Q 2-ves Mb din dn I

NGL Vis d0 N/4 N/A

/

50\\

YEf

&O NfA MN yes ao g/a U/n 60t O-Cccuents or notes identified during records assessment:

ASME N-Stamped valves contained in the test boundary were hydro tested in the vendor's shop.

B pass 6~r 3/y - no t- 0 + 6 - a voi 2-t

/

is ^to r M'6 A' L'"M 0"

M m 7-y p 70 /NOsc A-rYr)

/Ms tu yoiv //L' //tf &~5r & "*OA" Y

~ACMC 15 41 tac.W E/") to M t~

7TE S t~ B R /*.

Did System N-5 agree with the presence or absence of integral attachment colds?

fs$

Ce:pleted by: Od-/k 84 4 /v/es J~

Date:

l L

COLD HYDRO RECORD ASSESSMENT CHECILIST (m

o

2cet Area: ' ^x #/ N i b Y s

v Date Prepared:

BRP # o e-'

4

/u / S: " '

Preparer:

Was repair or attach-Was fabrication Were repair or Location of ment indi-Piping drawing (spool attachment repair or cated by Subassembly sketch) attached welds present attachment note on No.

to test BRP?

on spool?

weld.

test BRP7 fc-l-/2 8 c 2 0 ~)

/d*C NO ivf/Y N/A rec i-nn c 2 v 2.

s do iv/ir n/i>

/arra c k m e r i 12c -i-26 c ta

• 3 Yt:5 g,p tc-i on.can -c co u s Rc - r k 6 G L o -3 YC5 71 ira c e m ein T

$c /-An c 2co 3 Y[{

y(,4 gc.g.o rg.cz q. c q,,

gc. i. gg c a e, - S A/O rec i-ien c to - y' ycq sio

///A

'v/4 irris e sm c~ r CC -/ -12 A 0 20 - T NE4 th;g oc -t cn. e,s c et S At t no cac-T

$S

'~

s, REPA s(t TC> C o&

-/# 4 6 M O G 1/#(

EMR w %.nmn

^

N3 d0

/

~dc l-2 6 o2.0 ~ ~)

YC$

6{rL (LEP A ut.

a s. z s,g s.g e, tda Ar WCLOS Cccuents or notes identified during records assessment:

ASME N-Stamped valves contained in the test boundary were hydro tested in the vendor's shop.

- Tin'a S A P 15 AI so c.c Ve re D #A Pressu r st e r wsr MEA.

Hws En. # it c - t-c's-c o T- s

'* ' * " A ' "

" #^

c,ec's y princ de~p TD ntG' W W B g f)

- /H. w S.se pg 2 & 7 -

Did Systen N-5 agree with the presence or absence of integral attachment tolds?

Cecpleted by: kb bb Date:

4/'

ry 0

V

COLD BYDRO RECORD ASSESSMENl CHECILIST TCat Area: doperfmedd Y Date Prepared: _ 5// 7 /in' BRP 0 fc -i-12 8 -0 2 0 '

Preparer: _ J.Ds/lon,s Was repair or attach-Was fabrication Were repair or Location of ment indi-Piping drawing (spool attachment repair or cated by Subassembly sketch) attached welds present attachment note on No.

to test BRP?

on spool?

weld, test BRP?

Ac* / -/2/3 0 2 0 - *)

Yc~5 Al0 Nf/}-

n irn utsti:AlT~

lM de t to cal cylk Cerments or notes identified during records assessment:

ASNE N-Stamped valves contained in the test boundary were hydro tested in the vendor's shop.

~ YAM CL AC t - H,, i - 0 0 (- c e /K kes WW con miJ Any MJCLQc~t) A /Tnc HiviEA/ M r

ded Matt l Td A/0 TF th AtD i n /< on TE5 r (3/2 P, ? W ++n &G1C 1 br>e< l b ec.

~ A LS o Se c pp /vf2.-

l Did System N-5 agree with the presence or absence of integral attachment l

colds? yg3 Cccpleted by: _ b/'% NOe Date:

6 !/

J B f

COLD RYDRO RECORD ASSESSMENT

~N CHECILIST (hfcatArea: fem oi r bM4 A.h Y.

Date Prepared: - i /' 7 /Fi BRP # Cc i-R S c LW Preparer:.). De* & oes Was repair or attach-Was fabrication Were repair or Location of ment indi-Piping drawing (spool attachment repair or cated by Subassembly sketch) attached welds present attachment note on No.

to test BRP?

on spool?

weld.

test BRP?

IQI VES rdO M/A NM 2oI Vi~C N6 N/A it. w.re, n.w, rt o sa.u s e x an,<.

c a d. c *c e o f Mi VM S VC. kEf hflL w 1-t NO Vdi

}/EC

/d d A.>//4 M//+

0 Cecuents or notes identified during records assessment:

ASME N-Stamped valves contained in the test boundary were hydro tested in the vendor's shop.

- /Efnir wtrs swo,en two in Is t a c ic is /L on sp e c, e 2oI ge p m brn rtrs No 12 E~fA-t K S - Sp wo / Dec.u MC n lA he A Vf/1/ r e e, Me np.d(

pc, co s wt c ra_ - no w eL6e n.6, wm ge rArm e c/

cM ch And MTA<- 4CD to rWE rcs r 132 A Did Systen N-5 agree with the presence or absence of integral attachment colds?

/ES c m ieted by: 9 x _ t% M O

E

_ e /, -/,,

Date:

l l

l t

COLD HYDRO RECORD ASSESSMENT CHECILIST tos t A rea : [0.u fa chwe a k Date Prepared:

'i/- ) 3 3 BRP # A 6 f - /2./A o V L Preparer: J. De /ko, s Was repair or attach-Was fabrication Were repair or Location of ment indi-Piping drawing (spool attachment repair or cated by subassembly sketch) attached welds present attachment note on No.

to test BRP?

on spool?

weld.

test BRP?

EG1 YC%,

N0 N/M A /4 O

V Cecuents or notes identified during records assessment:

ASMB N-Stamped valves contained in the test boundary were hydro tested in the vendor's shop.

a rfachee( fo

/~B'S Y AA A

- c,u c Did Systen N-5 agree with the presence or absence of integral attachment colds?

Csapleted by:. 0

~ Of 0W Date:

Gbd/s9 0

0

COLD HYDRO RECORD ASSESSMENT CHECELIST fest Area: /$,u Air Anv n b Y Date Prepared: __ 6/ ' /r !'

BRP #

/2C / - /2 A - C YV Preparer: sf /> /3 u, s Was repair or attach-Was fabrication Were repair or Location of ment indi-Piping drawing (spool attachment repair or cated by subassembly

.shetch) attached welds present attachment note on Ns.

to test BRP7 on spool?

weld.

test BRP?

/ 3CL Yd do AJ!A A/!4

/vot va

<J o u/4

,u/4 l%L vR A) 0 N/A N!A

/ C 02.

VR No NA Al/A e

(

Cccuents or notes identified during records assessment:

ASME N-Stamped valves contained in the test boundary were hydro tested in the vendor's shop.

- 6 p o n e,s t WD

c. Art. o 5

/kt.E /&TTA<.itCO Tb TIES T f4ftP 1

l l

Did System N-5 agree with the presence or absence of integral attachment colds?

ft S i

CCCpleted by: _9t M w b O M Date: _ 6

// 8 8 l

COLD HYDR 0 RECORD ASSESSMENT CHECILIST fcst Area: Negufunk_4 Date Prepared:

6//7!e8 BRP # R d t - AS-cob Preparer: _

1 / d/&m 's Was repair or attach-Was fabrication Were repair or Location of ment indi-Piping drawing (spool attachment repair or cated by Subassembly sketch) attached welds present attachment note on No.

to test BRP?

on spool?

weld.

test BRP7 A /

t c c a. - /

A./ o M/h fv//;t it i+ 12 4 - + a t. ' ?.

VE$

10 o y/p

/p f G L.

Y6T Ald

/t//A N/A O

v Cecaents or notes identified during records assessment:

ASME N-Stamped valves contained in the i

in the vendor's shop.

test boundary were hydro tested

- fHip j3tt p 15 At-S c) co VC9tc7) IN b##"b llS CM c's are 4/ rect +ED tb TE'L Y f3 K f Did System N-5 agree with the presence or absence of integral attachment colds?

Cc pleted by: h M b b M O

Date:

dd//88

COLD BYDR0 RECORD ASSESSMENT CHECELIST test Area: bme.td,$vd[ f v

Date Prepared: __ M/ 7 !SS BRP # _p f-/ -/26 - o '3 Preparer: J. De h., s Was repair Was fabrication Were repair or Location of ment indi-or attach-Piping drawing (spool attachment repair or cated by Subassembly sketch) attached welds present attachment note on No.

to test BRP7 on spool?

weld.

test BRP7

/Q/

t/c1 NO

_IVA NlA 201 VE C Vf) n/h AlfR O

Cetments or notes identified during records assessment:

ASME N-Stamped valves contained in the in the vendor's shop.

test boundary were hydro tested Did System N-5 agree with the presence or absence of integral attachment colde? /(5

! ce=,let.d sy: M oc h _

6/v4s l

/

Date:

-~

COLD HYDRO RECORD ASSESSMENT CHECILIST test Area: _6 gr W h2<, [Y Dato Prepared: - Y /' 7 /3 BRP 8 5 - / - /2 /3 0 2 /

Preparer:./ /1 8e.,.s Was repair or attach-Was fabrication

.Were repair or Location of ment indi-Piping drawing (spool attachment repair or cated by Subassembly sketch) attached welds present attachment note on No, to test BRP?

on spool?

weld.

test BRP?

//() /

IM.S WQ AJ A

/t-/A (D

%_)-

Cccuents or notes identified during records assessment:

ASMI N-Stamped valves contained in the test boundary were hydro tested in the vendor's shop.

- rittb

/3/2P i.s /?t.So e.. Mst cfD sw s q mermext l c

Did System N-5 agree with the presence or absence of integral attachment Colds?,g d 'i ake sh5 e fkt r A tf u L w o f G n u.4 si d.e d k <;4 Sca nd a r Y plated by: [MA'm / dom Date:

6 [/M8A

/

COLD HYDRO RECORD ASSESSMENT CHECILIST f eet Area: /0.ufa/ hw,1 f t

Date Prepared: _5'/7 MJ' BRP # $f-I- R 6 - c 2 2-Preparer: _J. D e B o,,, <

Was repair or attach-Was fabrication tore repair or Location of ment indi-Piping drawing (spool attachment repair or cated by Subassembly sketch) attached welds present attachment note on No.

to test BRP?

on spool?

weld.

test BRP7 JDI VES ida tJ/A N/A

?OI UES dO N/A N'k4-b vc

,do a/4 a/4 40I Ve7 da N/A N/A To f Vr%

Ao N/A A//R rse uJ m O

'd Cccuents or notes identified during records sesessment:

ASME N-Stamped valves contained in the test boundary were hydro tested in the vendor's shop.

Did System N-5 agree with the presence or cbsence of integral attachment colds?

o P_kOM c:epl.t.d by:

Det.: zJ #es V

COLD HYDRO RECOND ASSESSMENT CMRCILIST f~h

) feet Area: /k.u Air / u<,t b Y Date Prepared: _ S /> 7 /'18 BRP # 5 T

• I- /L /A - cs 3 3 Preparer: J. !b dc., < s Was repair or attach-Was fabrication Were repair or Location of ment indi-Piping drawing (spool attachment repair or cated by Subassembly sketch) attached welds present attachment note on No.

to test BRP?

on spool?

weld.

test BRP7 57-/ -r2 4 c 3 3 1 i]cq de n/A g/A s: -i-n m - 2.

ver 1 rr aerm a k

$5%P da WI WII rJ o v/A u/A SQl yc4 e,% R tlEPA A du

~

Jol VG do N/A u/A-O Consents or notes identified during records assessment:

ASME N-Stamped valves contained in the in the vendor's shop.

test boundary vare hydro tested Did System N-5 agree with the presence or absence of integral attachment calds? g g Cospleted by: MLb h

N

_ 6

1. 3 Date:

m t

I t

COLD HYDRO RECORD ASSESSMENT CHICILIST

? cst Area: [natoar4 wnh Y 6

Date Prepared: _ 5' 7/ f'f ERP 0 S T - t - rL & - 0 3 S A Pr. sparer v Dt /5 ~, ' S Was repair or attach-Was fabrication Were repair or Location of ment indi-Piping drawing (spool attachment repair or cated by Subassembly

. sketch) attached welds present attachment note on No.

to test BRP7 on spool?

weld.

test BRP7 5 2 R 6 03 d - a.

1/u 5 NC N/A-A>//1 o rm wm e ~ r Sr -/-26 -c)tt 3 Y6 isa s r r - s c G - ecu c strt Sz -/-Ri$ '*3C 3 YES

$r - / a d oM -V

}/67 A)v A//4 A/A Crcuents or notes identified during records assessment:

ASMR N-Stamped valves contained in the test boundary were hydro tested in the vendor's shop.

n,. s d i2 P i s n t s c co vn e7) in G ao u f)

Ic.

Did System N-5 agree with the presence or abssace of integral attachment tolds? g e,pl.t.d by:0 t_

L% 8 4 Dat.:

(c/<wks' O

COLD HYDRO RECORD ASSESSMENT CHECILIST

, (a Tcat Area:6.u,o u h w e R t j Date Prepared: S/'7/68 BRP

• Sr-i < A - o38 8 Preparer:<l htOc'<5 Was repair or attach-Was fabrication Were repair or Location of ment indi-Piping drawing (spool attachment repair or cated by Subassembly sketch) attached welds present attachment note on No.

to test BRP7 on spool?

weld.

test BRP?

irrr u s w ~ r s S:-o /2 6 a at T UES w.a ti V.',Vl."2.22 s v o. a s c.1 8 C YES 4

at s o,s 1: -vaa ole-G VES t TT RE PA & $ #

s'y Q QO 10 1 YGS 81 R Reert sr was w.s

,Jo 201 ih=%

do y/n t/)A 301 VEq tJ o y/A fv/A 70L V63 do 4/N N/A-Ct nents or notes identified during records assessment:

ASME N-Stamped valves ccatained in in the vendor's shop.

the test boundary were hydro tested Did System N-5 agree with the presence or absence of integral attachment colds?

e,,i.ted by: SA&B%

64de Date:

o) u t c l

l t

COLD HYDRO RECORD ASSESSMENT CHECILIST (j\\fest Area: bwf4/ b 4b Y Date Prepared:

f// 7/*'9 BRP

• IdP- 2 6 -00 3 Preparer:.. /. d 4 9 0 c e 5 Was repair or attach-c Was fabrication Were repair or Location of usot indi-Piping drawing (spool attachment repair or cated by Subassembly aketch) attached welds present attachment note on No, to test BRP?

on spool?

weld.

test BRP?

bNl VC$

Alo A![A M!A 13l A9 Alo N4

/V//A Cccuents or notes identified during records assessment:

ASME N-Stamped valves contained in the test boundary were hydro tested in the vendor's shop.

Did System N-5 agree with the presence or absence of integral attachment tolde? /

C,pleted by:_ M w l_ besi Date:

?[N f9

(])

COLD BYDR0 RECORD ASSESSMENT CHECILIST Tcat Area: dryW/vre d Y

Date Prepared: -

SI7

' 5 BRP #

-V - / ' C / 2 1 Preparer:

' S *' ' ' O '

Was repair or attach-Was fabrication Were repair or Location of ment indi-Piping drawing (spool attachment repair or cated by Subassembly sketch) attached welds present attachment note on No, to test BRP?

on spool?

weld, test BRP?

.> L Vc:5

+] O

.u /A A> lp Cstments or notes identified during records assessment:

ASME N-Stamped valves contained in the in the vendor's shop.

test boundary were hydro tested s

,4;TP c!*L p rr IT57 O U

.(pc Did Systen N-5 agree with the presence or absence of integral attachment colds?),.,3

,,s O'spleted by: h A b.O#Od O Date:

6 ! "!OU m

f p

COLD HYDRO RECORD ASSESSMENT CHECILIST Tcat Area: b +Nhtv et Y

Date Prepared:

f// 7/3'9 BRP #

R C - / - /2 A - c: 2 9 Preparer: -> Ac 8v < s Was repair or attach-Was fabrication Were repair or Location of ment indi-Piping drawing (spool attachment repair or cated by Subassembly sketch) attached welds present attachment note on No.

to test BRP?

on spool?

weld.

test BRP?

TQ1 1/2 <

AJ o r>//S AhlA 6 G(

!MS Al a A:lA A /A-3w vs<

a a/n

<v/n v

Cc ments or notes identified during records assessment:

ASME N-Stamped valves contained in the test boundary were hydro tested in the vendor's shop.

- Pe r Nut it,5 7 3 5,,Ws eg. P w Ag act mc.lu.dd w me crip M T%t PL C M C.= 6,

M C Il W AS Pt5fot a tic %c(

MSC As t$

I3C4 u$ E Tf+ G Spas ls w crLE SNwA etM_r dra.w t h p e

Did System N-5 agree with the presence or absence of integral ettachment tolds?

-gg C mpleted by: h+ b /O /2W Data:

NM 88 O

/

l i

s PRESSURE DATA SHEET ATTACHMENT LEAD /

AREA PRINTS INSPECTORS ALTERNANT Chem. & Vol.

BRP-CS-1-RB-009.

Greg Fanning L

Control BRP-CS-1-RB-023' J.D. Scott t's BRP-SC B-025 H. Hall A

B RP-CS RB-026 '

Tom Coleman B RP-CS RB-02 7' BRP-CS-1-RB-028 -

B RP-CS RB-029.

BRP-CS-1-RB-038A' Ob All welded joints, connections, base metal repairs involving welding, and all regions of high stress as shown on attached IS0's have been hydrostatic tested and found acceptable.

B&RQ.C.I.b.Yu & W f*J/*!b

/

h, AC $' lbh r.hj)VL-AN1

/

/

O.

,.i s.\\

4 f

./. A, y :+.,

/ O'u %g e..

S);'f: 5.

'f b.t.!

\\.i

/

3 O

t s

v

COLD HYDRO RECORD ASSESSMENT CHECILIST f

fcst Area: ///N / /0/- dn6s/

w/

Date Prepared: _ id7 /88 BRP #

(5 / c0 9 Preparer: J DedMes Was repair or attach-Was fabrication Were repair or Location of ment indi-Piping drawing (spool attachment repair or cated by Subassembly sketch) attached welds present attachment note on No.

to test BRP?

on spool?

weld.

test BRP?

8Ql V ES x)0 A/A N'/A Cccuents or notes identified during records assessment:

ASME N-Stamped valves contained in the test boundary were hydro tested in the vendor's shop.

Did System N-5 agree with the presence or absence of integral attachment t:alds ?

ygg Cscpleted by:_ h Date: 6!/'/!d8

('

O m

COLD HYDRO RECORD ASSESSMENT CHECELIST i

Tcst Area: _ A/e4 //4/ bit //c /

Date Prepared: _. SY' MS 8 B RP e _ c s. / - r24 0 2 3 Preparer:../ 8d*' ' 5 Was repair Was fabrication Were repair or Location of ment indi-or attach-Piping drawing (spool attachment repair or cated by Subassembly sketch) attached welds present attachment note on No.

to test BRP?

on spool?

weld.

test BRP?

MTA c tw*tw i C $ / 2/3 0 2 3 - /

f*5 h&A s's I s79 eas cv2A c s -t ter3 e15 -I yES C 5 -I ~/2 6 - 0 2 i

• 2 YEG

^{u d/A A /A 3G L

'tES NO 4/A N/A 40*L yrs AO N/A N/A 5'o I YEs Alo N/A N/A (c01 YE5 4o d/A N/A

'la \\

>Es

^] o d/h dlA

^

i Ctraents or notes identified during records assessment:

ASMR N-Stamped valves contained in the test boundary were hydro tested in the vendor's shop.

Did System N-5 agree with the presence or absence of integral attachment colds?

Ca:pleted by: b/

hb Date:

(>

'/ V8

,~

g v

COLD HYDRO RECORD ASSESSMENT CHECKLIST C(-

y

[dbst !// / Set //c/

Test Area:

d Date Prepared:

f d 7 /86'

/

BRP e C S - / -MB *o E T Preparer: _ J. De&s. s Was repair or attach-Was fabrication Were repair or Location of ment indi-Piping drawing (spool attachment repair or cated by Subassembly sketch) attached welds present attachment note on No.

to test BRP?

on spool?

weld.

test BRP7 C 6 /-itis 02 s'- /

yc.s iJa ni/n a/A sirseirm ew r

2. 0 *2 YES

/rt,s. c4.o c1s o3o-cya A 2 O 2.-

YC.S 9 O 2-YEG H0 N/E N/A nrrscirm en r b

Y$$

16/), d$ /-0I9

• 0 V2 C94 >

YO 1.

Yb CD '.

YES Al0 N/A W/A-e rrs c u m w " r bbl-Y6$

N64 c5 / 079-oV5'"d48 N 'Z -

Yf$

~

901 yES nl o n/A a/A

~

l0 4 L.

yES HO ns/st al/A Cossents or notes identified during records assessment:

ASME N-Stamped valves contained in the test boundary were hydro tested in the vendor's shop.

Rep &uts es ixoicarro w acsex w it en rest 13nt' - xGo More sinres ac stEA+in s - Sp/ Doc.umen r&noAJ TEA 'F' es rn 5f An d cc.sMfric -40 ML D' AG

~ 13A nn ut LiNf is Mar N/&gusitn=O As (3rist!4 in 7Es r 00"'vo+n y-rms c oN Oir70^,1 WA4 MDA.GS $ 61.)

o^)

N C./t - / Y C '? [

Did System N-5 agree with the presence or absence of integral attachment j

colds? yg3 Carpleted by: _ d bbM Date:

4 //'i' 88 0

O l

COLD HYDRO RECORD ASSESSMENT CHECELIST 1sst Area: [ h ? M,i Vo l & n tro l Date Prepared: Sll7lF8 B RP # _ c 5 -/ -r26 -o?- 4 Preparer: sf/><'dones Was repair or attach-Was fabrication Were repair or Location of ment indi-Piping drawing (spool attachment repair or cated by Subassembly sketch) attached welds present attachment note on No.

to test BRP?

on spool?

weld.

test BRP?

(5-/-4.6 026 l VCS A.10 N/A N[4 3D1 VGS NO AfA Alfa-Bf4 40I VE5 (4) A6 FAIRS at anu s 4-uh,s t, n, s o do m

ws ao aM a/n Got yes no aM a/n Coco <nts or notes identified during records assessment:

ASME N-Stamped valves contained in the test boundary were hydro tested in the vendor's shop.

l Did System N-5 agree with the presence or absence of integral attachment colds?

VE5 Completed by: Mmbb Date:

6[//!88 b)

/

v l

COLD HYDRO RECORD ASSESSMENT CHECKLIST 1sst Area:[dt.st f /0/ dnf/o/

Date Prepared: _ f!/ 7!88 BRP 8 45-/-4/3'027 Preparer: 1/. de*deni$

Was repair or attach-Was fabricatiou Were repair or Location of ment indi-Pipiug drawing (spool attachment repair or cated by Subassembly sketch) attached welds present attachment note on No.

to test BRP?

on spool?

weld, test BRP?

[Ql YES Mo A)/A-N/A GGl YES Alo n//A

/\\llA Corments or notes identified during records assessment:

ASME N-Stamped valves contained in the test boundary were hydro tested in the vendor's shop.

l l

l 1

Did System N-5 agree with the presence or absence of integral attachment trolde ?

ygs l

Completed by: M b/ h Date:

4

'/ d f^h

,/

m W'

COLD HYDRO RECORD ASSESSMENT CHECKLIST

[/t64 f [d/ [oA[(p/

isst Arca:

Date Prepared:.S// 7/89 BRP # (5 -/-4 6 -6 2. 6 Preparer: v/ De'/3cen/s Was repair or attach-Was fabrication Were repair or Location of ment indi-Piping drawing (spool attachment repair or cated by Subassembly

. sketch) attached welds present attachment note on No.

to test BRP?

on spool?

weld, test BRP?

/o(

YES lJ o W/A N/A 2oI VEC d0 Al/A-Al/R 36I k'E6

^l 0 A//R N/A airscviewr 40I YES HM < < - r - a 2 - 71 L -c4/g f/ G /

O 50I

)'E6 rJo

^1/A r//A loQ 2.

YE5 sio 4/A N/A Cotments or notes identified during records assessment:

ASME N-Stamped valves contained in the test boundary were hydro tested in the vendor's shop.Ac c e p_ ou 5 feel MM Not sI4oWN IN AGO WK ou TEST 8 R. P - W ELD S MA W ~ D4 S/8 L, NC/L /z627s Vo to s ms */7 Acit+15'XJf",3 u 7-,)njen,yg c uc.s ,z gm piiv e,a pipr, n+ESE ca4 WEz D 5 a/O:E ^Jo T~ cs v 7e c O u> A fe tcS t. e cmc a tta ch e d +c t E s;,f 8/2 P. Did System N-5 agree with the presence or absence of integral attachment c; olds? l gg Pleted by: h Dah' M \\

COLD HYDRO RECORD ASSESSMENT CHECKLIST Test Area: OffM e/ (on//s/ Date Prepared: IN 7/d8 BRP # (6 /-!28'O2-Y Preparer: J. Dc 8e n o s Was repair or attach-Was fabrication Were repair or Location of ment indi-Piping drawing (spool attachment repair or cated by Subassembly sketch) attached welds present attachment note on No. to test BRP? on spool? weld. test BRP? A ITMHMk~N T / t.P / VES H6R CS 1 II2 72c cwit /Q l A/O 2 01 VE5 rJO d/A N/A 1 <w m ao a/n ich (O I Y65 AO A]lf4 A}l/% 6oi m 4o alA al/n rJ/,^ Lii4ta Cotments or noten identified during records assessment: ASME N-Stamped valves contained in the test boundary were hydro tested in the vendor's shop. f.,l s 6 ciz. cN moco/ /Ql der SHo AIAI IN AEO /Al< 0d 7Es7~ /34/0 A - dgie M -) ' cy 2. l/s/Os k1TMt.Hrv!WNT~ 3ar inOsckTE5 La4S /2EM/1-i^t cA),o/tr} 77,es c ta 4 5 Wen.E de r cov'c~re EO 's' A Mits r. Did System N-5 agree with the presence or absence of integral attachment wolds? YES Cacpleted by: bub Date: 4[/'//88

COLD HYDRO RECORD ASSESSMEN_T CHECKLIST Area:[/1/eufl!d[SnEv/ Test f Date Prepared: fM7/dB BRP

• _ f S -/ -/E 8 - 0 3 is' A Preparer:

J* M /3!1's Was repair or attach-Was fabrication Were repair Location of ment indi-Piping drawing (spool attachment repair or cated by Subassembly sketch) attached welds present attachment note on No. to test BRP? on spool?

weld, test BRP?

CS -t-r2/3 e3tf ~) }/ES AJ O ^)fN Ai/A sirn -ur 2Ql yc'S g,g se.i. o S 2.o,y.cvs 2 C.) I Yt~.5 Cotments or notes identified during records assessment: ASME N-Stamped valves contained in the test boundary were hydro tested in the vendor's shop. l [ I l Did System N-5 agree with the presence or absence of intogral attachment colds? yg3 l bb L b. M 6!/f!83 C wpleted by& Date: o D

i ,o PRESSURE DATA SHEET ATTACHMENT AREA PRINTS INSPECTORS LEAD /ALTERMNT Group 1A 'BRP-SI-1 RB-002A ' Dick Sprouse L BRP-SI-1-PS-008' M. Todd A ?BRP-SI-1-RB-015

• Tad Auner BRP-SI-1-RB-023A' BRP-SI-1-RB 023B' B RP-S I RB-041 '

BRP-SI-1-RB-045 - BRP-S I RB-054 ' BRP-SI-1-RB-055

• CRP-SI-1-RB-056*

l l l All welded joints, connections, base metal repairs involving welding, and all regions of high stress as shown on attached ISO's have been hydrostatic tested and found acceptable. B&R Q.C.I. M 7 -3 / - 3,2. ni c o ;Amm o COPY )PRV l

. COLD HYO_RO RECORD ASSESSMENT CHECILIST 28

• ost Area:

br~vv4 /8 Date Prepared: f-/7-8f BRP # $P/- 86 -##24 Preperer: J/d IIAIIM Was repair Was fabrication Were repair or Location of ment indi-or attach-Piping drawing (spool attachment repair or cated by Subassembly sketch) attached welds present attachment note on No, to test BRP? on spool?

weld, test BHP?

7GL Vf$ AC Nf) ) Nh 6 02. yds NC N/A N// 90L YES NO N/A ApQ i l Ceccents or notes identified during records assessment: ASME N-Stamped valves contained in the l-in the vendor's shop. test boundery were hydro tested C/7/Ch //YM h bS b bl e 7Gz De/ eta / pe, cae. I l l Did System N-5 agree with the presence or absence of integral attachment trold37 I y f' 6 Campleted by: Date: 4'//-f8 O /

COLD _ HYDRO RECORD ASSESSMENT CHECELIST ( / est Area: htm/) // t w Date Prepared: f-//N BRP

• SI-/ dd8 Preparer: _Ed Mnc In Was repair Was fabrication Were repair or Location of sent indi-or attach-Piping drawing (spool attachment repair or cated by Subassembly sketch) attached welds present attachment note on No.

to test BRP? on spool? weld. test BRP? 7G/ YsS Nc M//) N/A dG2 yrs NO N/// N/A ASGZ YES NO N/A N/A // $ / Yfg Njh) ty/jj Cotments or notes identified during records assessment: ASME N-Stamped valves containe/ in the in the vendor's shop. test boundary we a hydro tasted $ff /?b e ( W crc 0nj) l0. /n Did System N-5 agree with the presence or abscoce of integral attachmiat colds? YE5 / Cecpleted by: Date: 4-/V-f8 (

i l ) j&e /sl2-COLD HYDRO RECORD ASSESSMENT CHECKLIST fest Area: [rdvd /M Date Prepared: f-//'88 BRP 0 SI-/-28-6/G^ Preparer: 74U Sh'cklM< Was repair or attach-Was fabrication Were repair or Location of ment indi-Piping drawing (spool ' attachment repair or cated by Subassembly sketch) attached welds present attachment note on No. to test BRP? on spool? weld. test BRP? @ Q2 YES NO Nh ^!bl 9Q/ YsS NO N/// N/// ZOGl YES ^'O M/// N/A TGL YiS NO NYl Nthf / 4'GZ. yrs No N/// N/// /90/ Yi$ MO N/// N/$ (G/ YiS NO N/// N/A ($ 2. YfS NO N/// N/// Coccents or notes identified during records assessment: ASME N-Stamped valves contained in the test boundary were hydro tested in the vendor's shop. 8/2/ dlSc SfM/ l0 ccY.;ere m / N-H-3 c>t. /9G/ p//e c/ Atbr-k W n n d cc u n / e>r re/s/ c/- /f-SY-c/4 eincs spficL J A, A.,/ w i l Did System N-5 agree with the presence or absence of integral attachment colds? Y5S \\ i J Cocpleted by: W Date: 4-//-8f l

pip Zef&- COLD HYDRO RECORD ASSESSMENT CHECKLIST Test Area: $r'en'A -/M \\M Date Prepared: I'//38 BRP

• SI-/ d/I Preparer:

7W Ida I he Was repeir or attach-Was fabrication Were repair or Location of ment indi-Piping drawing (spool attachment repair or cated by Subassembly sketch) attached welds present attachment note on No. to test BRP? on spool? weld. test BRP? //G/ Yi6 N6 N/d N/A l ~\\ (J Cetments or notes identified during records assessment: ASME N-Stamped valves contained in the test boundary were hydro tested in the vendor's shop. Z/Q/ d dkc/ n /Nr d be itn/ccurca/cn re fesf CS-//'-6 ff-C/A! y 1 8SP Also cncre / m &p /D Did System N-5 agree with the presence or absence of integral attachment c: olds ? ffS 6cpletedby: /// +" Date: 8-/I'f8 /

COLD HYDRO RECORD ASSESSMENT CHECKLIST ( ) fast Area: Sam # /// Date Prepared: 5'/7-88 BRP e SI-/-fd-Z3sf Preparer: 7W 3br bhr f Was repair or attach-Was fabrication Were repair or Location of ment indi-Piping drawing (spool attachment repair or cated by Subassembly sketch) attached welds present attachment note on No. to test BRP? on spool? weld. test BRP? FGz Yh*S NC N/A N$ / Cotments or notes identified during reco... assessment: ASME N-Stamped valves contained in the test boundary were hydro tested in the vendor's shop. Did System N-5 agree with the presence or absence of integral attachment c: olds? VfS Cccpleted by:. M 1" Date: 4-N-ff O

COLD HYDRO RECORD ASSESSMENT CHECELIST TGst Area: d)wf /// Date Prepared: 6 /7-ff BRP 0 ST*/'fA *dI3d Preparer: ] a/ ShnIbr Was repair Was fabrication Were repair or Location of ment indi-or attach-Piping drawing (spool attachment repair or cated by Subassembly . sketch) attached welds present attachment note on No. to test 3RP? on spool? weld. test BRP? 3G2. Yd6 N6 ^ll// A/b/ /Gl YE6 N$ N/A n/A 2$2 'ffS NC N/A N/// (o l cotaants or notes identified during records assessment: ASME N-Stamped valves contained in the test boundary were hydro tested la the vendor's shop. C/?ic$ A/$wleI b b**l 8AA ben /b l &lStle hl b'sn by fler bnye< /rsivsiy S[ /-/05 - 76/ - CV2A /6 review sd /!<M wriLs L, Did System N-5 agree with the presence or absence of integral attachment t;olde? YES plated by: _ [/ m-Date: d'/9-f8 /

COLD HYDRO RECORD ASSESSMENT CHECILIST V [rav4 /I test Area: Date Prepared: IV7-J8 BRP 0 SE*/~A8-dY/ Preparer: TOIYrx bht d Was repair or attach-Was fabrication Were repair or Location of ment indi-Piping drawing (spool attachment repair or cated by Subassembly sketch) attached welds present attachment note on No. to test BRP? on spool? weld. test BRP? /&2. Yd6 NU N d' N/A t TG2 YES NO N/A N/A O Cerments or notes idantified during records assessment: ASME H-Stamped valves contained in the test boundary were hydro tested in the. vendor's shop. (/)C$ //$ e l k lesb 8AA Did Systen N-5 agree with the presence or absence of integral attachment colds? YES Cocpleted by: // Date: 4-N-88 O ~/ V

COLD HYDRO RECORD ASSESSMENT CHECELIST I ) rest Area: [Yvt'A /// m Date Prepared: f-N-88 BRP

• Y -/-/ 8-4 96 Preparer:

Ed A' Was repair or attach-Was fabrication P'are repair or Location of ment indi-Piping drawing (spool . attachment repair or cated by Subassembly . sketch) attached welds present attachment note on No. to test BRP? on spool?

weld, test BRP?

SQ2. yds NG ^!/A ^{bl /6()7 YES ^/O N/A N/4 ~ %.) f Cocaents or notes identified during records assessment: ASME N-Stamped valves contained in the tout boundary were hydro tested i's the vendor's shop. Cr/(j dit$c el lc NSf8b. Did System N-5 agree with the presence or absence of integral attachment c:olde? %'d Cc::pleted by: I Date: 6W'88 ~ O

COLD HYDRO RECORD ASSESSMENT CHECELIST Vest Area: Smud M V Date Prepared:

1. ~//'88 BRP t SE-/-Ad-CS'l Preparer:

TW Sbn I " Was repair or attach-Was fabrication Were repair or Location of ment indi-Piping drawing (spool attachment repair or cated by Subassembly sketch) attached welds present attachment note on No. to test BRP? on spool? weld. test BRP? ///hds,esf M/d SI-/-/28 - SV-2 YES Sr./.cgo.co 7. cy, g $1-/ -fd-5y-& yES ST-/-/26-SV- / nfS A'd N/// N/// SE- /-26 -I'l-E. YES %~5 i h h /// /~W-7 A'O W O' v Concents or notes identified during records assessment: ASME N-Stampad valves contmined in the test boundary were hydro tested in the vendor's shop. d2' / ///so concrec/ in Onrfor. ' *<v E* Did System N-5 agree with the presence or absence of integral attachment wolde? YES / Coopleted by: 6/ %w Date: d-M/-88 O v

COLD HYDRO RECORD ASSESSMENT CHECKLIST 1Gst Area: $ W /M (/ ~._ Date Prepared: 5-/7-JJ BRP 0 SZ~/~Ed -Off Preparer:. [W Skw Y Was repair or attach-Was fabrication Were repair or Location of ment indi-Piping drawing (spool attachment repair or cated by Subassembly sketch) attached welds present attachment note on No. to test BRP? on spool? weld. test BRP? E-/-f6-GY-/ VE$ NC N/// At/d SI-/-/28 -(S - 4' 'r'fS N& N/A N/A SI-/ ST-Z YES NO A//A N//I A/rxdaen t' M rd' SI-l-A&- SY-3 YE$ fr /-087 -ott-cwk 2-/-fd-rf-3 975 Cocaents or notes identified during records assessment: ASME N-Stamped valves contained in the test boundary were hydro tested in the vendor's shop. Did System N-5 agree with the presence or absence of integral attachment colds? Y6 / Cecpleted by: / Date: dVV-88 ~ / i

COLD HYDRO RECORD ASSESSMENT CHECILIST (J1sst Area: bov4 /M Date Prepared: f-//- 88 BRP # SI-/-Ad -dn Preparer: _ 7/4' 4 Was repair or attach-Was fabrication Were repair or Location of ment indi-Piping drawing (spool attachment repair or cated by Subassembly sketch) attached welds present attachment note on No. to test BRP? on spool? weld. test BRP? 29I YfS NO N/// "/A 3Q) YfS No N/// N/A '/Q l Ys6 s$O' 5(so'7 ce.s 9'Q/ YiG SQ) YES N6 N/// N/// 5E-/- Ad- % -/ YES No N/// M/// 3 J l Cctments or notes identified during records assessment: ASME N-Stamped valves contained in the in the vendor's shop. test boundary were hydro tested i Did System N-5 agree with the presence or absence of integral attachment l colds? i Yis l Cocpleted by: _ M Date: ['/['88 l

)t,L- )i. (~J') PRESSURE DATA SHEET ATTACHMENT L AREA PRINTS INSPECTORS LEAD /ALTERNANT 9:, -. IS - E So-??- 1-R3-001' ' Ton Ellis L - BRP-RH-1-RB-002 - Fred Evans I BRP-SI-1-RB-001' O. Wol f A - B RP-SI-1-RB-002'* - BRP-SI-1-RB-006 '- - B RP-S I RB- 016 '. - BRP-SI 1-RB-017 '. BRP-SI-1-RB-032. m All welded joints, connections, base metal repairs involving welding, and all regions of high stress as shown on attached IS0's have been hydrostatic l tested and found acceptable. l B&R 0.c.I. m. & D ' %2fk n ANI W$A! b ( %A 1 VU2-RNfDh"- l 9fRKZ O ww.sagpy l . _._...........a v y 1

COLD HYDRO R200RD ASSESSMENT CHECILIST tost Area; hvv4 /d Date Prepared: 5 M'8I BRP # $H-l~Nd *COI Preparer: $l b bk I Was repair or attach-Was fabrication Were repair or Location of ment indi-Piping drawing (spool attachment repair or cated by Subassembly sketch) attached welds present attachment note on No. to test BRP? on spool?

weld, test BRP?

f//-/-ff 6/-/ YtYS Nt) N/// N/// 1 /O-/*$8-G/-Z Vfd NC "// N/// az vrs No "//i sk 5'Gl ff.S ND N)/ Nh i Cernents or notes identified during records assessment: ASME N-Stamped valves contained in the test boundary were hydro tested in the vendor's shop. LYd/ //b0 CbtYrc N1 $*fi+r n&I Did System N-5 agree with the presence or absence of integral attachment wolds? Y56 Cetpleted by: / "> +

• v Date:

4-/5'88

COLD HYDRO RECORD ASSESSMENT CHECELIST , test Area: $c5c'z) /8 Date Prepared: I'/7-88 BRP 0 $H-/-Ad -80L Preparer: ]4] SN c Was repair or attach-Was fabrication Were repair or Location of ment indi-Piping drawing (spool attachment repair or cated by Subassembly aketch) attached welds present attachment note on No. to test BRP? on spool? weld. test BRP? $N-/-A8- $2 - d Yf' f NO N//f Nltl f//-/-#4-s2 - / Yas' ivo "N n/i/ VG/ Yff NO N/g N/g SQL Y f' S NG NM N// i Cctments or notes identified during records assessment: I ASME N-Stamped valves contained in the test boundary were hydro tested in the vendor's shop. $0*' t/.l.s0 CCt'Cn'c M hm/fr utf shbl b & AA' cmc's Did System N-5 agree with the presence or absence of integral attachment c:olde? Y'iG s Cc0pleted by: - Date: /$-//-f8 , ] /

COLD HYDRO RECORD ASSESSMENT CHECKLIST (6kset Area: [4+f/A /d ~./ Date Prepared: I'// If BRP

• 6[~/~Id -80/,

Preparer: J& /* nt Was repair or attach-Was fabrication Were repair or Location of ment indi-Piping drawing (spool attachment repair or cated by Subassembly sketch) attaahed welds present attachment note on No. to test BRP? $ on spool? weld. test BRP? I //rMaar weW Si-HZd-o/- Z t'tfS fr-/-ers on evzA Si/-/d-C/ L WS ST-/-/26-0/- / YfS Nd N/A Hbf SI-/- Ad-6/- 3 Yif ko Vit 44 SI-/- ad-0/ 'l y /' S no qs x,/g S[-t-Ad - C/- 6 Y6*S ,,/faham7'xeW / .,. ppg.,,,g. e y,g Sf.i.pg.n. g gS Cetsents or notes identified during records assessment: ASME N-Stamped valves contained in the test boundary were hydro tested in the vendor's shop. l l l l l Did System N-5 agree with the presence or absence of integral attachment l colda? l Yd6 i Cetpleted by: Date: [-/fd8 o ~/ v

COLD HYDRO RECORD ASSESSMENT CHECILIST-( fast Area: NvM /d f-//- SS Date Prepared: 5' /J-F8 w' BRP 0 SE-/~ A/3 -C02-7cu Snu /c/ina c/ Preparer: O/M &awr f Was repair or attach-Was fabrication Were repair or Location of ment indi-Piping drawing (spool attachment repair or cated by Subassembly sketch) attached welds present attachment note on No. to test BRP? on spool?

weld, test BRP?

2Q2. YES No N/i/ Mk 3Gz Yi5 No '%1 N/AI Ov i Cecsents or notes identified during records assessment: ASME N-Stamped valves contained in the test boundary were hydro tested in the vendor's shop. 67/0 MNk < / k kst $Y Did System N-5 agree with the presence or absence of integral attachment t: olds? WS Cccpleted by: _ / + + " Date: 4-/f-88 j 9

COLD HYDRO RECORD ASSESSMENT _ CHECKLIST r (,\\) tost Area: qA /8 f-/7-Jf Date Prepared: f/f-JS BRP 0 S f - h f 8 - 24'6 Jtu S/m Adhc/ Preparer: Ato Gwsyt Was repair or attach-Was fabrication Were repair or Location of ment indi-Piping drawing (spool attachment repair or cated by Subassembly sketch) attached welds present attachment note on No, to test BRP? on spool? weld. test BRP? /702. YiS No M/4 Mbt /$QI yds NO Nltf NN 1 Z/GL VES NO N//f N/// /3G/ Y6S NO N/A N/A /YGZ YfS NO N/Af N/// /2 GL YES ^IO N/// Nlff O V Cocaents or notes identified during records assessment: ASME N-Stamped valves contained in the test boundary were hydro tested in the-vendor's shop. C a/C $ /? /kic k lcsfA$/ e Did Systen N-S agree with the presence or absence of integral attachment YUS, //fhebmf sve/b oclh les l betw lM f-Ccapleted by: Date: d-//-88 lO Y 4

COLD HYDRO RECORD ASSESSMENT R CHECKLIST Test Area: hrevA/d 4-//-S$ Date Prepared: f-/y-fJ BRP 0 SE*/* f8-C/d flu.3frA h'<f_ Preparer: est t2wAH Was repair Was fabrication Were repair or Location of ment indi-or attach-Piping drawing (spool ' attachment repair or cated by Subassembly sketch) attached welds present attachment note on No. to test BRP? on spool?

weld, test BRP?

SQ 2. Y 6' 6 ND N/// N/A WQl W6 NO 3GI WS prisub mrf 4+/d_ N/// N/4 fr. i.ai.m.cgis-SQ/ YCS 20I Yid ND N/A N/A /0 & YfS No "/A N/A a ~ Cosmonts or at,tes identified during records assessment: ASME N-Stamped valves contained in the test boundary were hydro tested in the vendor's shop. (,yjg j- /fhs Ib k S 0$b e 1 Did System N-5 agree with the presence or absence of integral attachment colds? WS / i Cc=pleted by: _ /!/M m" Date: 4-//~8f l

l COLD HYDRO RECORD ASSESSMENT CHECELIST fh ( 2sst Area: /-rvtW /8 3;/7-35 Date Prepared: f-/S-ST BRP 0 SE-/~/28 -0/ l 7ty ffne d/4rd Preparer: /2/7/ CcwMt Was repair or attach-Was fabrication Were repair or Location of ment indi-Piping drawing (spool attachment repair or cated by Subassembly sketch) attached welds present attachment note on No. to test BRP? on spool? weld. test BRP? /GZ. VE6 Nd h/'A N/A ZGI 7'ES ^'0 N/A NM H#adurf MW 3GI YsS si-i-tez -sos -ais 301 YES '/Gl YE6 NO ^//A i /d V SQ2. yrs No N/A N/A Iv Ceccents or notes identified during records assessment: ASME N-Stasped valves contained in the test boundary were hydro tested in the vendor's shop. cwet sn4/ 4 s/dd 1 l I Did System N-5 agree with the presence or absence of integral attachment colds 7 I ViS Cetpleted by: M Date: 8-//-88 Cl / v

COLD HYDRO RECORD ASSESSMENT ,_s CHECELIST ) N JTest Area: hsvD /8 fn-85 Date Prepared: S*/S*$5 BRP 0 S[~l~Ab *&32-Tw S/n< Alim d Preparer: a th G u n /- Was repair or attach-Was fabrication Were repair or Location of ment indi-Piping drawing (spool attachment repair or cated by Subassembly sketch) attached welds present attachment note on No. to test BRP? on spool? weld. test BRP? 9G7-YC6 No M/g N/A /dQz. YES NC '?A' N/A ,e (_/ i Corments or notes identified during records assessment: ASME N-Stamped valveu contained in the test boundary were hydro tested in the vendor's shop. Did System N-5 agree with the presence or absence of integral attachment tolds? YfS pleted by: V~ Date: fen-58 /

O PRESSURE DATA SHEET ATTACHMENT N./ AREA PRINTS INSPECTORS LEAD /ALTERNA'iT Group 1C BRP-SI-1-RB-012 - Jon Rogers L BRP-SI-1-RB-028-Jimmy Staus BRP-SI-1-RB-037a D. Snow A l BRP-SI-1-RB-038A. BRP-SI-1-RB-039 - BRP-SI-1-RB-040 BRP-SI-1-RB-057-BRP-SI-1-RB-058 BRP-SI-1-SB-002. BRP-SI-1-SB-003. Ah BRP-SI-1-SB-033 ' All welded joints, connections, base metal repairs involving velding, and all regions of high stress as shown on attached ISO's have been hydrostatic tested and found accepteble. l n ) BIR Q.C.I_. Af.. J LA. 0 N!Ytk ANI m }M0d.T 0X&* m-n C) ,g~yg&pFV A .<. w .a --,.1

COLD HYDRO RECORD ASSESSMENT fCs t A re a : gpu/) /('i Date Preparod: i/7 89 B R P # _ JI- / - /?& 0 / 2 Preparer: Ib (oa)J I' C Was repair or attach-Was fabrication Were repair or Location of ment indi-Piping drawing (spool attachment repair or cated by Subassembly . sketch) attached welds present attachment note on No. to test BRP7 on spool? weld. test BRP? /O 2 YCS do Al/4 N. s O' L.j Cotsents or notes identified during records assessment: ASME N-Stamped valves contained in the test boundary were hydro tested in the vendor's shop. l l l Did Systen N-5 agree with the presence or absence of integral attachment colds? 773

• C 4 b h D1 M s Date:

/ / 5'!a*9 bpletedby:6

COLD HYDRO RECORD ASSESSMEN_T '('~h. CHECILIST ' b Toot Area: _ Sew h-Date Prepared: b~ A 7 SY B RP #.;f1 / - /2& O LL Preparer:

b. co vu c Was repair W

or attach-Was fabrication . ere repair or Location of ment indi-Piping drawing (spool attachment repair or cated by Subassembly . sketch) attached welds present attachment note on No. to test BRP? on spool? weld. test BRP? ?> 1 4*5 AN n/A w/A i Ccccents or notes identified during records assessment: ASME N-Stamped valves contained in the test boundary were hydro tested in the vendor's shop. (g;c.uc ta cbe:f fo 12=5 7~ AW l l 1 Did System N-5 agree with the presence or absence of integral attachment l colds? AS plated by: ' rd-- F' 6C Data: 6/' 5 3 1 I

a p / e-{ l COLD BYDRO RECORD ASSESSMENT O CHECELIST V 'Tcat Area: s, '.d v) / /-- Date Prepared: 6//7'93 BRP # SI-t -/M '0 3 7 Preparer: D, Sw ct r C Was repair or attach-Was fabrication Were repair or Location of ment indi-Piping drawing (spool attachment repair or cated by Subassembly sketch) attached welds present attachment note on No, to test B RP'? on spool? weld. test BRP7 57 i C8 o s, 2 Yd5 ,lr_. p trisc r+ a^) :~ . i. i,x. c,,. c s z it s:, ' 31 2. >'M. Sr 1 r'.A 0 3 ) - ?- y'E5 r5 i%pisin a 2, a r, ct O i w pu,, tu o Sr - i-rM O 9 2 .7 y tis Y3 N/P-MfA by em - c s 14 YE6 NO A;/P-tult} d " *t'wv r,,, Sr - o -nr3 c 31 - S* yE5 b a r n.1 o n.u g : m. YCS ,. g-a,,,,, A TIAc<fi>16/VF 57-tA' ^M1( )tE < u,e u... i n co ; cm n ss -t-d8 031 - 5* ych < - st As 3, - G vgs 13 fIL - 8 GF% U2. Afc w u PACP ,,. g,4., )J\\ \\ y !5 D N/F N'b Cecuents or notes identified during records assessment: ASME N-Stamped valves contained in the test b'oundary were hydro tested in the vendor's shop. p,, $.jn p a nt sc, c. Kn.c!D id &cupa r t,>1 e n t L m_s pr.:c ,r t7/+c nD re ntC Mr & A Ausa

e e ??

2b2~ Did System N-5 agree with the presence or absence of integral attachment c: olds? sf g g Completed by: h2-b_. b /3m+ k Date: 6[ 'f8 e

3 COLD HYDRO RECORD ASSESSMENT _ i c; .., 2 CHECELIST Tcat Area: I"'Nf I l Date Prepared: _ E ' s: BRP # 17 /-46 c 3 7 Preparer: 8 ' -- ' r Was repair or attach-Was fabrication Were repair or Location of ment indi-Piping drawing (spool attachment repair or cated by Subassembly sketch) attached welds present attachment note on No. to test BRP? on spool? weld. test BRP? 8)Q L UES Al0 / M /V AJ[d l 1 Cetments or notes identified during records assessment: ASME N-Stamped valves contained in the test boundary were hydro tested in the vendor's + i., p. i - At % .5 4' C /') # " $ / l l l Did System N-5 agree with the presence or absence of integral attachment colds? sj ;$ l Co: Plated by: k L- ) Date: W/I $ b \\ f l-i t l l l l

I COLD HYDRO RECORD ASSESSMENT CHECELIST n i i j test Area: S/'0 0 P /C-Date Prepared: 6/'7/68 BRP

• w -/ -#6 -J36A 1

Preparer: _ b Wa;a f-t Was repair 3 or attach-Was fabrication Were repair or Location of ment indi-Piping drawing (spool attachment repair oi-cated by Subassembly sketch) attached welds present attachment note on No. to test BRP? on spool? weld. test BRP? ST-s - R e> - an yes NV n/A y/g A ff/$c a r 6 Al r SI-s -9 6 c3t3 3 ye s q, 3 r- #,c6 ecs t uR SI i 48 cas 3 N]o SI-I-RG -o38 - 4 VJ5 NO N/A xj/A / uJ l Cerments or notes identified during records assessment: ASME N-Stamped valves contained in the test boundary were hydro tested in the vendor's shop. Q,5 3 2 P is a h o c'e Verec/ in Comfw fM ?rt { f ccrre c f fy iJe f ~ / ~d d ~ 0 3Y Preparer: - U &' " 3 ' L Was repair or attach-Was fabrication Were repair or Location of ment indi-Piping drawing (spool attachment repair or cated by Subassembly sketch) attached welds present attachment note on No. to test BRP? on spool?

weld, test BRP?

/4 /rr4 C /tM L tU T ,$r-e - rt A. OJ ) - 2. 'l 'T 5 m pr.i-in cc1 cian. 51 a se a m - 2. VTE ,+ /T Rc km n r S; - / - AB o3 9 - 3 V -:C, w,? pr-o. i e i. ce r. c y 2 S $; i -rzs w yr. 5 YE-L y z - o -icis c31 3 L'E C r ir Mrnins h a w.% NO 2e n.e r. u nt era p I $7 ns c3y 't . EQ rJo N/A Al/A Ceccents or notes identified during records assessment: ASME N-Stamped valves contained in the test boundary were hydro tested in the vendor's shop. p rS gn P iS 11L % cc.c'enn ra femmerm evT~ z.- Did System N-5 agree with the presence or absence of integral attachment tolde?,,g- / plated by: b[ bbM Date: 6MH

COLD HYDRO RECORD ASSESSMEPT CHECELIST (mv)?cstArea: SAo.er? /C Date Prepared: _ f 7 I BRP i ':) T - i - d '3 ' ;~u Preparer: _ d & va - C Was repair or attach-Was fabrication Were repair or Location of ment indi-Piping drawing (spool attachment repair or cated by Subassembly sketch) attached welds present attachment note on No. to test BRP? on spool? weld. test BRP7 .y ; s - ria.: v e - 2 J'S AI C. m/A N/i4 sr o -nn e s: 3 ad S Alo N!2 Ya G / 5c i-ries : t u 4 yc5 AIO ylp r /A r Cccuents or notes identified during records assessment: ASME N-Stamped velves contained in the test boundary were hydro tested in the vendor's shop. po,$ gn p /> ih So .'o /L^K & D 'N D '" W ~ \\ - r312 P in.>ichr&3 !% t^??- ST-/-'c 5-4 a K eso s. goo / sr -i-n/3 c yo -3

7?s

.. t~sc f 3

l p y i. t h. :, queo f i s sr ro s - C S L i<- Per p;<n ut neviesa-r),is m,- 11a j an 1 c,<,,,,,a l ste s ayn rev/cf m y we44'd a 'acArnen h, hou e,re r (J iy m e A.,,,.; e / s !a a n m ou t u r / c(CGin s p/~is.- A, a n s N ' 'v 's ric,H/,/ a / a ch.n g,1 ;' ev i 's 'S c J Did System N-5 agree with the presence or absence of integral attachment colds? g Ca;pl e t e d b y : _ 'b A~- bd O)cnd M S' ' 9 9 Date: g-V tw l

l COLD HYDRO RECORD ASSESSMENT CHECILIST ? cst Area: [/10u4 !L Date Prepared: - T ' b /- BRP O G r - r - n d o b' *) Preparer: D. & U.t r T. Was repair or attach-Was fabrication Were repair or Location of ment indi-Piping drawing (spool attachment repair or cated by Subassembly sketch) attached welds present attachment note on No. to test BRP? on spool?

weld, test BRP?

/w 1 VES N'o a/A n /A Cocaents or notes identified during records assessment: ASME N-Stamped valves contained in the test boundary were hydro tested in the vendor's shop. Did System N-5 agree with the presence or absence of integral attachment tolde?gy. ,Ce*pleted by M kf Date: 6 /'s-/d'9 ) 5 c- \\s

COLD GYDRO RECORD ASSESSMENT 3 CHECILIST_ ,_jTcst Area: - I^)oop /.' Date Prepared: - E!' ' ! 'l d BRP # S J' '-/t d - o f 8 Preparer: D fe 6 v f /^ C Was repair or attach-Was fabrication Were repair or Location of ment indi-Piping drawing (spool attachment repair or cated by Subassembly sketch) attached welds present attachment note on No. to test BRP? on spool? weld. test BRP? /W2 YE~C Al0 lkbR /J/A l l Cccuentr or notes identified during records l assessment: ASME N-Stamped valves contained in the te.st boundary were hydro tested I in the vendor'a shop. l l l Did System N-5 agree with the prssence or absence of integral attachment tolde?, 3-Cegpleted by: bm-AYO M Date: 6 /'iSS %) 1

COLD HYDRO RECORD ASSESSMENT A CHECELIST (,)catArea: 84/2c o o /C Date Prepared: 5 / 7/-M BRP

• S r r - 4 8 o c 2-Preparer: D A cret Was repair or attach-Was fabrication Were repa!.r or Location of ment indi-Piping drawing (spool attachment repair or cated by Subassembly

. sketch) attached welds present attachment note on No. to test BRP? on spool? weld. test BRP? A rrA :i m E)vi~ b r-t-c,A o a2 - J ,G V w.,- sr-i-s+s-oos yse S T - t - M + v 2 - ~l 'l = c Ccccents or notes identified during records assessment: ASME N-Stamped valves contained in the in the vendor's shop. test boundary were hydro tested Did system N-5 agree with the presence or absence of integral attachment toldo?j'D c-,pleted by:'lyk f9 84 Date: ( / 'i!S 8 m (

} COLD HYDRO RECORD ASSESSMEN_T CRBCILIST Jcst Area: 57/1w4 l < - Date Prepared: - SY' N'lS' BRP # sr - i-93 vo 3 Preparer: /> do. vet.' ( Was repair or attach-Was fabrication Were repair or Locktion of sent indi-Piping drawing (spool attachment repair or cated by Subassembly sketch) attached welds present attachment note on No. to test BRP? on spool? weld. test BRP? .51~- t-S!1 c c 3 i Ve* S A)O AI/ ) )/z-g / } Cccuents or notes identified during records assesss 4t: ASME N-Staaped valves contained in the test boundary were hydro tested in the' vendor's shop. ,de yA >L S lu t~t2 6 in pica RED in 13/a ct: in k en % e TL:s r 1372/>- /26 O Alc zi 5re7E3 Wo ilcy/HnS - speo } A>c. a m e rr l* b!m VWo f a e s r 4ese nrz ' c.ss m c r ic. - 1J 0 gn;>,n & p ei fo r,e e p e [ t Did Systen N-5 agree with the presence or absence of integral attachment colde? ,g - Ca plcted by: Tdb b' f Date: G [' 's /b3 \\ v ( l

COLD HYDRO RECORD ASSESSMENT /~+ CHECELIST k Tcat Area: - $r?o ve /> / c. Date Prepared: $ /' ' ' 'S BRP # S r - ed ts - 0 3 3 Preparer: _ D Gu or c Was repair Was fabrication or attach-Piping drawing (spool _ Were repair or Location of ment indi-attachment repair or ested by Subassembly . sketch) attached welds present attachment note on No. to test BRP? on spool?

weld, test BRP?

5: -l-se - e 3 b-J ' tis N& ^'/b AJ!A Cetments or notes identified during records nosessment: ASME N-Stamped valves contained in the test boundary were hydro tested in the vendor's shop. Did System N-5 agree with the pretence or absence of integral attachment colds? grg c Carpleted byt

1. b lbf Date:

6/' 3 (1:)

,o PRESSURE DATA SHEET ATTACHMENT U AREA PRINTS LEAD / INSPECT 0RS ALTERNANT GROUP 10 8RP-SI-1-RB-009A - ' " ' - - t1 B RP-S I RB-O ll-Jim Mathis 4s44 BRP-SI-1-RB-033 - Don Nisich BRP-SI-1-RB-042 O. dj:-L A BRP-S I-1-RB-052

7. Ca LWM BRP-SI-1-RB-053-84 9-s I

- It ib-cop. A W-!/-/-Rg-ets. O v All welded joints, connections, base metal repairs involving welding, and all regions of high stress as shown on attached IS0's have been hydrostatic tested and found a ccep table. BSR Q.C. k d l f & YW6A V UIa 8bsW bll% ANI f l fo Y ' -)-3 /-U"L - - -,m 4 lc$ bb'g%T pg3 O 2-A' -[ Sit J

COLD HYDRO RECORD ASSESSMENT CHECILIST t/ TOs t Area: An eu p !D Date Prepared: 6 /r ' '- BRP

• S r - #-d 6 -oc9 A Preparer:

(). e a r '. Was repair or attach-Was fabrication Nere repair or Location of ment indi-Piping drawing (spool attachment repair or cated by Subassembly sketch) attached welds present attachment note on No, to test BRP? on spool? weld. test BRP? 7C L %8 ed 3 M!A M'A f L'; t 6 _= \\ N3 M4 N,,\\ WL ' ?: Aio AsI A N. c. Cecuents or notes identified during records assessment: ASME N-Stamped valves contained in the test boundary were hydro tested in the vendor's shop. c,v._ a "a ched % N tem GRP Did Systen N-5 agree with the presence or absence of integral attachment colds? s[th Cacpleted by: i eb Ov Date: 6/'T!I9

~ 1 i COLD _RYDRO RECORD ASSESSMENT g CHECELIST s' Test Area: _ 6, Lu p /d j Date Prepared: Y BRP # 3 7 - e - '?ra - o " Preparer: J & us< d I 1 Was repair or attach-Was fabrication Were repair or Location of ment indi-Piping drawing (spool attachment repair or cated by Subassembly sketch) attached welds present attachment note on No, to test BRP? on spool?

weld, test.9RP7

!:; 2 l'!S nio n/A m/A ('v ' Cccuents or notes identified during records assessment: ASME N-Stamped valves contained in the in the vendor's shop. test boundary were hydro tested c,y c a s a n.< c h e d to he 7~< S F Bre f* Did Systen N-5 agree with the presence or absence of integral attachment i colds? i vrit 2pleted by: 'v, L._ [p /3N9 Date: 6 // c / =' q l ^ l I

COLD HYDRO RECORD ASSESSMER (~h CHECILIST OtcstArea: ho ID Date Prepared: _ s/> 'le 6 BRP # '; ; - ' - 4 6 m M Preparer: 3 0~ t e t Was repair or attach-Was fabrication Were repair or Location of ment indi-Piping drawing (spool attachment repair or cated by Subassembly sketch) attached welds present attachment note on No. to test BRP? on spool?

weld, test BRP?

bc s-t6 u r % - 6 'je k do N!A* n/A e r pa l.a w - # - as en-1 Ur k r rr R e ra s r it h mio Mce ^/ O 'f u l \\K d& N/A N/A ~? v i /.% dC / N/A NA so\\ 0&s MO N/A I NA ~~~ Cctments or notes identified during records assessment: ASNI N-Stamped valves contained in the in the' vendor's shop. test boundary were hydro tested Did S.rsten N-5 agree with the presence or absence o.f integral attachment colds? g3 ccc SA bf /be Date: /$/' 5'!S8 (}pletedby:~

COLD HYDRO RECORD ASSESSMENT CHECILIST (V icst f Area: Seove /.O Date Prepared: 5' 7 ' ' ' BRP # .51 - < -d r3 - w 2. Preparer: D - w a, t Was repair or attach-Was fabrication .Were repair or Location of ment indi-Piping drawing (spool attachment repair or cated by Subassembly . sketch) attached welds present attachment note on No. to test BRP? on spool? weld. test BRP? 9J1 ef5 /d d N/A A/A

• 3v!

i c* '. A0 s, ',1 pj /1 i lL 9 L v.? 5 n) 0 N/A N/A ~) Q t s!*6 h)G t1]ln ^)lA O Cerments or notes identified during records essessment: ASME N-Stamped valves contained in in the vendor's shop. the test boundary were hydro tested [,;, C ,s ,w n c i~c D 13 T?n~ TZ; 5 r 82P Did System N-5 agree with the presence or absence of integral attachment c:alde ? g.ga i plated by: hadu /MN O Date: 0 [ 5'!d3

COLD HYDRO RECORD ASSESSMENT [_) CHECKLIST ( -tcet Area: d&+ r ) / r7 Date Prepared: $ '- ) ' - ~ BRP *

• > I - ' - e <3 - o f 2-Preparer: S

~ s.' r c Was repair or attach-Was fabrication Were repsir or Location of ment indi-Piping drawing (spool attachment repair or cated by Subassembly . sketch) attached welds present attachment note on No. to test BRP? on spool? weld. test BRP? s r-4 -tm a > 2. - i bs M3 N A ^> 61 A rau*ntti Ni $ *, I

• ff r3 L' 'i l ' Z, ych j,, f 3 7.,. c ta g -ec./. c q 2 g.5 7 -r c/S 5, t - 2.

p'd S S E - u -ftt3 052-% v3 A) O N/A A1 l'/h n e s e,ur en r b ; - o - 2 /% - t y 2 - Y ya un 3r 1-0% -cos estu s c - o - n n - 7, 2 4 ?c~S A fi~A (. It M c~A) F b; *1*!!!% * $ $ ? Y \\* [( _,,s ? S T-t

• C $ $ - C O 2. -C 4 2 h Gc-o fd 8 C*s2 - W Y$$

5r-1 reis - c s 2 - 5' vcz rrr 12ceniit n s, a+ :> eac es AD Zu AT FrG O 'o G L t.ri s dd A.s/A A)/h Cercents or notes identified during records assessment: ASME N-Stamped valves contained in .the test boundary were hydro tested in the vendor's shop. t i l l Did System N-5 agree with the presence or absence of integral attachment colds? ,g 1 plated by: 6[ Ot'b% Date: ! M /a~$ 1

COLD HYDRO RECORD ASSESSMENT O CHECILIST 1 ) \\ d fcst Area:. S !a 4 /D Date Prepared: - 5 '> 7 '3* BRP # 9; <-/3 'o T 3 Preparer: - U Cccoet Was repair or attach-Was fabrication Were repair or Location of ment indi-Piping drawing (spool attachment repair or cated by Subassembly sketch) attached welds present attachment note on No. to test BRP? on spool? weld. test BRP7 JQ! Vet edo N[A /v N t r e c.a-en- # y,; ( s;.3 N/A fu/A Ar Ato S1 s - a & vi s ~L V6 Q T rr P ri on. rt a-l e ew pa, o Nb O Cctments or notes identified during records assessment: ASME N-Stamped valves contained in the test boundary were hydro tested in the vendor's shop. _ c,u J s nre te tfa.c.k e d fe k fest /h' d. - Tim &gp i5 ar.so cca pa, tar _n [ 3 co y<ea e a Did System N-5 agree with the presence or absence of integral attachment colds? plated by: D,, k.. ' l) ~ ~' Date: 'o ['i !6 5 L. i

cotD HYDRO RECORD ASSESSMENT CHECILIST test Area: _ _ !,,s c r3 /D Date Prepared: S /* ' / P - BRP e o r - i - 4 8 - o c., e, Preparer: d.Ge.aae# Was repair or attach-Was fabrication Were repair or Location of ment indi-Piping drawing (spool attachment repair or cated by Subassembly sketch) attached welds present attachment note on No. to test BRP7 on spool? weld. test BRP7 '/ '_t / 'CS M3 ty/4 A> / l / 4 / ,\\ > Vrs rGc n/A a /f) I6 G1 WC r4G N<A ^>/4 li 9) \\r rrs MD N/A N//} O Cem ents or notes identified during records assessment: ASME N-Stamped valves contained in the test boundary were hydro tested in the vondor's shop. ~ Th.t dAI) /b ALSO C&c~K t1h in 'frey JA ~ Csv c. \\ .A n C MThc etED n MG TE Sr Ba r* Did System N-$ agree with the presence or absence of integral attachment tolds? )' I; 5 C":p l e t e d b y kbbw / Date: 5 // i e'! (J \\ /

i l I COLD BYDRO RICORD ASSESSMENT _CHICILIST gp t us L D est Area: f o r?.cu p ID Date Prepared: s /i 7 / s '" BRP # S r - i - /4 8 c a s Preparer: - B Cw u r F Was repair or attach-Was fabrication Were repair or Location of ment indi-Piping drawing (spool attachment repair or cated by Sebassembly sketch) attached welds present attachment note on No. to test BRP7 on spool? weld. test BRP? \\: C L. Yi 5 tl e d!A

• , t, 0O\\

ve ~ de t:lc ru n LO G ) 4% r!. t ln t'in 8Qt V;i A d6 rdM NA/ SGI v r. Mc rJ 'a N/A fog 1. s.; c td a n in o }i'. 4ut W, t3o tJA ,N 1 i4 Q 1 tt S de %'A eJ 4 Cetments or notes identified during records assessment: ASME N-Stamped valves contained in the in the vendor's shop. test boundary were hydro tested 7)t/ $ 3/? P i$ Ah 5& de> V d 72 t D //t/ Co m >s p //} ~ Cht ( 1 /WL G A TT/t C ff @ 73 77 6 / B I~ /$AP ALsc 3cc p p 2-f' ?-- Did systen N-5 agree with the presence or absence of integral attachment colds?Je e n50pleted by: b/ / b-m Date: 6 i

1. E i

i

COLD HYDRO RECORD ASSESSMENT ~ ' I I CHECILIST fcet Area: ', <3 iB Date Prepared: </ - BRP # -. i'. a .C Preparer: B < Was repair Was fabrication .Were repair or Location of sent indi-or attach-Piping drawing (spool attachment repair or cated by Subassembly sketch) attached welds present attachment note on No. to test BRP? on spool? weld. tsest BRP? Et G g Vt e, A) e N//1 e i'a v Ceraents or notes identified during records assessment: ASME N-Stamped valves contained in the test boundary were hydro tested in the vendor's shop. i i - m s-se g p 4 :. l l Did System N-5 agree with the presence or absence of integral attachment colds? c, Rmcpleted by: '3*. ix 6 'el m a Date: U) (, / ' s /# s ( - - - - - -}}