ML20155A369

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Notice of Violation from Insp on 880325-0509.Violation Noted:While Performing Surveillance LIS-NB-404,procedure Not Adhered to When Instrument Technician Inadvertently Valved in Variable
ML20155A369
Person / Time
Site: LaSalle  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 05/25/1988
From: Forney W
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To:
Shared Package
ML20155A362 List:
References
50-374-88-10, NUDOCS 8806100038
Download: ML20155A369 (1)


Text

,

{

NOTICE OF VIOLATION Commonwealth Edison Company Docket No. 50-374 As a result of the inspection conducted on March 25 through May 9, 1988, and in accordance with 10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C - General Statement of Policy and Procedure for N'lC Enforcement Actions (1985), the following violation was identified:

Technical Specification 6.2.A requires that detailed written procedures including applicable checkoff lists shall be prepared, approved, and adhered to; including those procedures recommended in Appendix "A" of Regulatory Guide 1.33, Revision 2, February 1987, and surveillance and testing requirements.

Regulatory Guide 1.33 includes procedures for control of measuring and test equipment and for surveillance tests, procedures and calibrations.

Contrary to the above, on March 9,1988, while performing surveillance LIS-NB-404, "Unit 2 Reactor Vessel Low Low Water Level RCIC Initiation, Low-Low-Low Water Level LPCS/RHR Initiation, and ADS Permissive Functional Test," the procedure was not adhered to when an instrument technician inadvertently valved in the variable and reference legs of a switch being tested with the equalizing valve open. Subsequent actions to correct the problem lead to recirculation pump trip, reactor core power oscillations and reactor scram.

This is a Severity Level IV violation (SupplementI).

Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, you are required to submit to this office within thirty days of the date of this Notice a written statement or explanation in reply, including for each violation:

(1)correctiveaction taken and the results achieved; (2) corrective action to be taken to avoid further violations; and (3) the date when full compliance will be achieved.

Consideration may be given to extending your response time for good cause

shown,

[W.)L.Forney,M.

os.25. es Dated ief

- Weactor Projects nch 1 8806100038 880525 PDR ADOCK 05000373 O

DCD