ML20154N305
| ML20154N305 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Yankee Rowe |
| Issue date: | 07/15/1988 |
| From: | Drawbridge B YANKEE ATOMIC ELECTRIC CO. |
| To: | Russell W NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20154N047 | List: |
| References | |
| FYR-88-100, NUDOCS 8809290263 | |
| Download: ML20154N305 (12) | |
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ - _ - _ _ - _ - f I ENCLOSURE 3 SALP COMMENT EVALUATION AND SALP ERRATA NRC Lomments on Substantive Licensee Comments The Itcensee, in its July 15, 1988 letter, commented that the SALP Board i may not have been fully aware of the initiatives that have occurred during l 2 the SALP period in the trea of Emergency Preparedness. Althcugh we recognized and documented that efforts had ot:urred to upgrade the level of off-site emergency preparedness, the detailed information that was provided confirmed and further clarified the extent of those upgrading and i enhancement efforts, and reflected a licensee commitment of significant l resources in this area. In addition, we acknowledge that the additional information that was provided demonstrated that the licensee has been ) successful in resolving most of the Emergency Response Facility Appraisal open items. However, because of issues raised during the assessment i l period (i.e., 1988 scenario problems; EAL weaknesses; and NAS equipment problems) we continue to believe that ins m ed management attention is warranted to enhance the armergency preparedness actitiW performed by l ). the YNSD Radiation Pretection Group in support of emergency preparedness for the Yankee Nuc kar Power Station. Con seq ue n t1;,, while our review of the licensee's comments on Ems.gency Prepar% ness has not resulted in revising the rating assigned to that i arer, we feel it appropriate to modify the analysis and board recomenda- { tions. SALP Board Report Errata PAGE/ f LINE PREVIOUS WORDING REVISEO_ WORDING 5/50 "team and positive worknr attitudes." "team and posittve worker l attitudes. Management initiatives and the crmmit-s ment of significant resources to the emergency preparedness ares have been noted." Basis: To reflect amended assessment of Emergency Preparedness. i ( 9 I t k QfK05000029 800915 i o PNV [
2 PAGE/ LINE PREVIOUS WORDING REVISED WORDING 29/32 "other minor improvement areas " "ether minor improvement areas, Ouring this assess-ment period, the licensee has been successful in re-solving almost all ERF open items." Basis: Modify report to reflect ar.cepted comments, which more accurately reflects licensee's performance in this area. 30/36 "revision of the state's emergency "revision of the state's plan " emergency plan. Significant resources were expended and accomplishments have occurred this assessment period that have enhanced the level of off-site emergency preparedness." Basis: Modify report to reflect accepted comments that significant efforts to upgrade the level of off-site emergency preparedness have occurred, 31/11 "Continue efforts to resolve "Continue efforts to resolve concerns involving EAL's," concerns involving EAL s, and enhance YNSO Radiation Protection Group activities in support of YNPS emergency preparedness " Basis: Modify report to reflect NRC's concern that although the licensee is viewed as a strong performer on an overall basis, the lack of fully effective oversight in some activities that are the responsibility of the YN50 Radiation Protection Group warrants additional management oversight, =}}