ML20154H809
| ML20154H809 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Rancho Seco |
| Issue date: | 09/01/1988 |
| From: | Yuhas G NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20154H807 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-312-88-25, NUDOCS 8809220133 | |
| Download: ML20154H809 (1) | |
Text
.
APPENDIX A NOTICE OF VIOLATION Rancho Seco Nuclear Generating Station Docket No. 50-312 14440 Twin Cities Road License No. OPR-54 Herald, California 95638-9799 During an NRC inspection ronducted on July 19-21, 1988, a violatior, of NRC requirements was identified.
In accordance with the "General Statement of Polic and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions," 10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C (1988. the violation is listed below:
Paragraph 50.54(q) of 10 CFR Part 50 requires that emergency plans be followed and maintained.
Paragraph 8.5.2 of the Rancho Seco Emergency Plan requires that emergency "instruments and equipment shall be calibrated at intervals established by the Radiation Protection Department." Section 3 of Procedure AP-311, ' Portable Health Physics Instrumentation" states in part, "dose rate instruments are calibrated quarterly."
Contrary to the above, on July 20, 1988, two portable dose rate survey instruments. Serial Nos.1410 and 1632, located in the Auxiliary Building were observed to have exceeded their calibration frequency.
The instruments were last calibrated on November 23, 1987 and were due for recalibration on February 23, 1988.
This is a Severity Level V Violation (Supplement VIII).
Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, Sacramento Municipal Utility District is hereby required to submit a written statement or explanation to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission, ATTN:
Document Control Desk, Washington, DC 20555 with a copy to the Regional Administrator, Region V, and a copy to the NRC Resident Inspector, T. D'Angelo, within 30 days of the date of the letter transmitting this Notice. This reply should be clearly marked as a "Reply to a Notice of Violation" and should include for each violation:
(1) the reason for the violation if admitted, (2) the corrective steps that havebeentakenandtheresultsachieved,(3)thecorrectivestepsthatwill be taken to avoid further violations, and (4) the date when full ccepliance will be achieved.
If an adequate reply is not received within the tim' specified in this Notice, an order may be issued to show cause why the etcense should not be modified, suspended, or revoked or why such other action as may be proper should not be t' ken.
Consideration may be given to extending the response time for good cause shown.
FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Dated at Walnut Creek, California b-k_
this ) T day of 7t%hbT 1988 G. P. Yuh
, Chief
~
l Erlerge reparedness and l
Radiation Protection Branch 1
i G809220133 880901 ADOCK0500g2 DR