ML20154B046

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Requests Listed Addl Info in Order to Complete NRC Review of Topical Rept NEDO-31400, Safety Evaluation for Eliminating BWR MSIV Closure Function & Scram Function of Main Steam Line Radiation Monitor
ML20154B046
Person / Time
Issue date: 09/06/1988
From: Liza Cunningham
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To: Grace D
BWR OWNERS GROUP
References
NUDOCS 8809130190
Download: ML20154B046 (3)


Text

'

[d' F

i e

$3 C809

/

o UNITED STATES f

g NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION s

-)

wAsmwoTos. o. c. 20sse 7

\\...../

l SEP 0 01983 i

Mr. Donald Grac.e. Chairman l

BWR Owner's Group GPU Nuclear I Upper Pond Road Building E Parsipanny, New Jersey 07054 r

Dear Mr. Grace-

SUBJECT:

RESOLUTION OF OUTSTANDING ISSUES RELATIVE TO TOPICAL REPORT NEDO-31400 "SAFETY EVALUATION FOR ELIMINATING THE BOILING WATER REACTOR MAIN STEAM LINE ISOLATION VALVE CLOSURE FUNCTION AND SCRAM FUNCTION OF THE MAIN STEAM LINE RADIATION MONITOR" i

This letter is a followup to the meeting of August 15, 1988 between the BWR's Owner's Group and the USNRC on the above referenced topical report. We believe i

that the meeting was extremely useful, with each group developing a better l

understanding of the other's point of view.

l Following the meeting it was concluded by the USNRC staff that, in order to r

complete the staff review of the subject topical report, the following addi-tional information is needed:

1.

Describe alternatives to the removal of reactor scram and main steam i

line isolation valve (MSLIV) isolation functions from the steam line radiation monitors which could be utilized to overcome the N-16 spiking problem and why they were dismissed in favor of the function removal.

2.

Describe the emergency operations procedure (EOP) which would be

[

utilized by the operators in lieu of the present steam line radiation monitorfunctionswhichwouldguideoperatoractionincaseofmajor fuel failure or a controi rod drop accident (CRDA).

3.

If steam line radiation monitor reactor scram and MSLIV isolation functions are removed, describe, in case of a CRDA, the modes for reactor scram and timing of the scram as compared with the present

mode, 0

'e d

$O'l D g

Y

/

885953019o ggo906

$) ' h 's,

PDR TOPRP ENVGENE C

PDR gts

l s.

Donald Grace SEP 0 01988 4.

Describe the capability of augmented offgas (A0G) systems to handle the environment (e.g., radiation levels, hydrogen-oxygen gases) resulting from a CRDA.

Describe the E0P for the operation of the A0G system in the event of a CRDA.

On. a; ;.

U h Q l.I. f. ! ' :

1 LeMoine J. Cunningham, Chief Radiation Protection Branch Division of Radiation Protection and Emergency Preparedness Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation cc:

JFulton, BWROG Distribution:

i FJCongel, NRR LJCun'.ingham, NRR 00Lych, NRR JEWigginton, NRR 15pickler, NRR FC5kopec, NRR TECollins, NRR WDTravers, NRR RJBarrett, NRR POR Central files RPB R/F P

W

./

  • 5ee previous.oncurrence
RfB:0 REP 15pickler FC5kopec 00 Lynch JEWigginton L4Cunningham 03/31/88 08/M/83 03/01/88 09/01/88
f. 09/06/88

Donald Grace 4.

Describe the capability of A0G systems to handle the environment (e.g., radiation levels, hydrogen-oxygen gases) resulting from a CRDA.

Describe the E0P for the operation of the A0G system in the event of a CRDA.

LeMoine J. Cunningham, Chief Radiation Protection Branch Division of Radiation Protection and Emergency Preparedness Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation cc:

JFulton, BWROG Distribution:

FJCongel, NRR LJCunningham, NRR 00 Lynch, NRR JEWigginton, NP.R 15pickler, NRR FC5kopec, NRR TECollins, NRR W0 Travers, NRR RJBarrett, NRR Central Files RPBR/F3 l

RF P

RPS: 0 REP dq-

[2 REP

{

PB:0 REP C:RPB:0 REP I

i er FJ6Cohc OL%ylich

{&JEWigginton LJCunningham

/) /88 08/it/88 g/0/88 09/g/88 09/ /88

_