ML20153G423
| ML20153G423 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Satsop |
| Issue date: | 08/22/1988 |
| From: | Pate R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V) |
| To: | Mazur D WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20153G428 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8809080153 | |
| Download: ML20153G423 (4) | |
See also: IR 05000508/1988002
Text
_______
__
_ _ _ _ _
'
i
.
.
0 h bf
Docket No. 50-508
Washington Public Power Supply System
P.O. Box 968
3000 George Washington Way
Richland Washington 99352
ATIN:
Mr. D. W. Mazur
Managing Director
Gentlement:
.
SUBJECT:
NRC REVIEW 0F WASHINGTON NUCLEAR PROJECT NO. 3 (WNP-3)
READINESS REVIEW MODULE C3-02 CONCRETE - REPORT NO. 50-508/68-02
The NRC has completed a detailed review, inspection, and verification of the
subject rnedule which you submitted to the NRC on June 1,1967.
Periodic
inspections were conducted at the WNP-3 site while the Hudule C3-02 activities
were in progress, and the resultant findings were discussed with members of
your staff at the conclusion of those inspections.
Technical reviews were also
conducted in NRC Region V and Bethesda offices, and the findings from those
reviews have also been discussed with ycur staff in conjunction with the field
inspections. The NRC Inspection Reports which document the reviews are
identified in the enclosed report.
Areas contained in the module which were reviewed, examined, and verified are
identified in the enclosed report. Within these areas, the inspection
verification consisted of selected examinations of procedures and
representative records, discussions with personnel, observation of activities
in progress, examination of completed construction worF, and review of your
associated lice.7 sing comitaents.
The results of our reviews and inspections are sunnarized in the enclosed
report. Your attention is invited to those natters which will be pursued during
future licensing reviews and inspections. These ratters include:
1.
Acceptable completion of deferred review segments;
2.
Acceptable completion of planned engineering evaluations identified in the
Modul- C3-02 Open Items List;
3.
Acceptance of FSAR change requests yet to be submitted to hRC;
4.
Acceptable completion of corrective work identified in the Module C3-02
Open Items List;
5.
Adecuate control of future construction activities that may affect the
ccepleted work;
,
6.
Effectiveness of the preservation program for concrete structures;
8009000153 000822
,~ 3
,
>
jy(-
,
.
DR
ADOCK 050
58
,/
-
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -
,
'.
,
4
1
2
!
7.
Acceptable assessment of the impact of future Engineering Assurance Program
]
results on adequacy of completed construction work.
l
Based upon the hRC review and inspection of those activities identified in the
module, we have deterinined that concrete construction completed at the time of
'
'
work stoppage at WNP-3 is acceptable assuming effective resolution of the open
iter:s identified above. This decision was based upon infortnation currently
l
available to the inspectors and reviewers. Should infomation subsequently
becone available which was not considered during this review or which conflicts
'
with earlier information, it will be evaluated to determine what effects it v.ay
have on the above conclusion.
-
Please contact us should you have any questions concerning this letter.
4
l
Sincerely,
/*
'
R er
e,
f
Reactor Safety Branch
'
Enclosure: Report i;o. 50-508/88-02
i
cc w/ enclosure: P. D. Olson, WPPSS
!
L. J. Garvin, WPPSS
I
State of Washington
i
.
bec w/ enclosure:
Project Inspector
l
Resident Inspector
G. Cook, RV
<
l
B. Faulkenberry, RV
i
J. Martin, RV
i
docket file
j
T. Foley, NRR
l
bec w/o enclosure:
J. Zo111 coffer
j
M. Smith
'
REGION Y
AToth
SRichards
GBagchi
GVissing
LRubenstein
f/g/88
6/ /88
7/I2 /88
3/4/88
f//f/88
l
-
Il COPY 'i
UEST COP)
. R
R r UEST COPY '. R UEST COPY 'i
EST COPY '_l (b
/ NO
.
/ NO
'
j
E
/ NO
YE5 / NO
/ f;0
v
v
v
v
-
RPate
,5 d e it Je b / Co k t u tte M C e
3
fe
!
T COPY J
l
IES / NO
]
!
(
TO PDR
'
JE5 / h0
I
t
L
__ _ _ - . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ .
'
,
.
t
e
2
l
l
Based upon the NRC review and inspection of those activities identified in the
module, we h4ve determined that concrete construction co'npleted atthe time of
'
wrk stoppage at WNP-3 is acceptable assuming effective resolution of the open
items identified above.
This decision was based upnn information currently
available to the inspectors and reviewers. Should information subsequently
become available which was not considered during this review or which conflicts
with earlier information, it will be evaluated to determine what effects it may
have on the above conclusion.
l
Please contact us should you have any questions ccreerning this letter.
!
$
Sincerely,
,
Robert J. Pate, Chief
i
l
Reactor Safety Branch
1
Enclosure: Report No. 50-508/88-02
i
cc w/ enclosure: P. D. Olson, WPPSS
1
L. J. Garvin, WPPSS
j
State of Washington
!
bec w/ enclosure:
l
Project Inspector
Resident Inspector
'
l
G. Cook, RV
i
B. Faulkenberry, RV
J. Martin. RV
'
docket file
)
T. Foley, NRR
i
l
bec w/o enclosure:
J
J. Zo111 coffer
H. Snith
4 &c;
REGION Y
SRic)ha
GBagchi
dissing
LRube
AToth
7/sr/88
75/h/88
]#/MBB
p f//y/88
T/ly/68
i
ut:
)
hN k0
Mf k0 h kf k0
kf k0
i
'
l
R ' ate
V
V
~
6/ /88
,
REQUESTCOPYj
' s*/. '.V[cds Jy J rM4h
/
YES / NO
.
h?oupe
e
TO
R
Csbre9.<c
$
lNr1e t om curu ceJ.
de fo/!
l'./S *Pr
v
O' 'f;,
6
5
.
'e
.
RECEIVED
NRC
REWON V
' DOCUMENT NAME:
C3-02 FINAL REPORT
REQUESTER"S ID:
WILSON
88 JUL21
all : 0'l
AUT:: ~S NAME:
A. TOTH
--
DOCUMENT C0ff!ENTS:
SUBJECT:
NRC REfIEW OF WMHINGTON NUCLEAR PROJECT NO. 3 (WNP-3)
READINESS REVIEW MODULE C3-02 CONCRETE - REPORT NO. 50-508/88-02
1. GBagchi
....... Concur,
h 7[N
.
2. GVissing
............... Concur
M 7//I
3. LRubenstein
................. Concur
4. AToth
................. Concur d e8 [
f f' - 9df,!/0
5. SRichards
................. Concur M /) A
!
6. RPate
.......... Concur & Sign
I'.
.. :
y
y;
,
7. Cheryl
Dispatch
y
$
,
.)
i
O
~1
CAN THIS BE DELETED AFTER DISPATCH 7
YES
NO
--
35
..