ML20151Y528
| ML20151Y528 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Big Rock Point File:Consumers Energy icon.png |
| Issue date: | 12/31/1987 |
| From: | CONSUMERS ENERGY CO. (FORMERLY CONSUMERS POWER CO.) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20151Y509 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8805050028 | |
| Download: ML20151Y528 (145) | |
Text
.
,- - =-
ATTACHMENT Consumers Power Company Big Rock Point Plant Docket 50-155 I
BIG ROCK POINT NUCLEAR PLANT ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT JANUARY THROUGH DECEMBER 1987 April 29, 1988 i
i l
Y l
l i
143 Pages OC0488-0120-NLO2 8305050028 880429 D l PDR ADOCK 05000155 l R DCD
r 1987 Big Rock Point Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report A. Introduction The 1987 Big Rock Point Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report provides a summary and data interpretation of the Big Rock Point Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program as conducted during the 1987 reporting period. Reporting requirements are detailed in Technical Specifications 6.9.2.1, 13.2 and Tables 13.3-1 through 13.3-3. Big Rock Point was off-line for most of the first six months of 1987 due to refueling /msintenance outages.
There are no remaining 1987 laboratory sample analyses pending completion for inclusion into this report. The results of all environmental samples collected are evaluated as follows:
- 1. Air iodine and particulates, TLD's (monthly and quarterly), and milk data vere statistically evaluated at th'e 95% confidence level (using SAS program) by the methodology detailed in Palisades' Procedure HP 10.2. The data was compared against two criterium: the first criteria is the statistical difference which indicates that sample results from near sites are greater than those from control sites, but that the difference is not significant. The second criteria is the evaluation level (twice the statistical difference) which is the minimum detectable difference that exceeds zero at the 95% confi-dence level. If the evaluation level is exceeded, then correlation of the results with effluent releases is done.
- 2. Well water, lake water intake / discharge, sediment, fish and other aquatic biota samples were evaluated using data means comparisons against an appropriate control location (if available) and BRP Technical Specification limits.
B. Discussion and Interpretation of Results
- 1. Air Samples Comparison of the airborne particulate sample data between near-site and control locations did not exceed the statistical difference. In many instances, control location sample values were greater. There was no I-131 activity reported above minimum detectable levels. It should be noted however that air sampling station 3-CH had 'two (2)'
elevated I-131 samples of 40.447 and <0.133 pCi/m' on 10/8/87 and 12/10/87 (respectively) due to a low flow air volume.
A total of 364 air samples were collected and analyzed during 1987, however 20 sample results were deleted from statistical evaluation as follows:
4 IC0488-0077A-HP01 -
1
7 sample results for I-131 - 2 of the samples did not meet LLD l requirements (as noted above) at air sampling station 3-CH; and 5 of the samples were eliminated due to contamination received from the air sample filter holder (s) at air sampling stations 5-PT on i 9/10/87, 9/24/87 and 11/5/87; 6-BC nn 9/17/87; and 7-TC on 8/6/87.
The contaminated filter sample holder (s) were unce used as part of the BRP stack gas filter sampling system, and although being below the BRP release limits of 41000 dpm, the sample holder (s) were l contaminated enough to affect REMP air samples. When the problem was discovered, all air sampling station filter holders were decon-taminated.
13 sample results for air particulate gross beta - 8 of the samples did not meet LLD requirements due to either a malfunction with the air sampling unit (low volume flow) or the particulate filter was improperly seated in the air sample holder (allowing for sample by pass). The af fected samples were: 4-SL on 1/22/87, 1-ST on 4/16/87, 3-CH on 10/8/87, 3-CH on 12/10/87, 5-PT on 4/9/87, 6-BC on 8/13/87, and 7-TR on 8/26/87 and 12/17/87. The other 5 air particu-late sample results were deleted from evaluation because of contami-nation received f rom the air sample filter holder (s) as explained for I-131 results.
The deleted samples constitute 1.9% of the I-131 and 3.6% of the air particulate / gross beta total analyses not used in the statistical evaluations. This is a 2% higher deletion rate than in either the 1986 (excluding Chernobyl af fected samples) or the 1985 Big Rock Point Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Reports. The unusable sample results did not diminish from the overall air sample evaluations, however. Technical Specification sensitivities were met on all samples other than noted.
The air iodine / particulate samples are collected on a weekly basis from 7 air sampling locations. Air is metered through the sampling l unit at a continuous 1 cfm flow rate through a Celman 47mm air filter (air particulate) and a Scott air iodine cartridge. Both filters are in-line with each other and housed within the same filter holder.
The 1987 air sample results are consistent with actual effluent releases and site-specific meteorology.
- 2. TLD's - Camma Dose There were a total of 214 monthly, 72 quarterly, and 17 annual TLD's collected and analyzed. Only 2 monthly (BRP-08 and BRP-09) and 1 annual (LRP-08) TLD were reported mis. sing.
The following is detailed for the missing TLD'st IC0488-0077A-HP01 1 l
1
i l
- a. The February monthly TLD at location BRP-08 (control lead storage cave) was overlooked during the regular monthly TLD change-out/ collection. By the time the error was realized and .)
the TLD sent to Teledyne Isotopes for processing; the validity of the data would have been questionable (no intransit controls).
- b. The April monthly and annual TLD's at location BRP-09 (meteoro-logical tower) were discovered missing. Search of the area revealed negative results. The missing annual TLD was replaced with a spare (SP-1). The missing April TLD was replaced with the May monthly TLD.
- c. During the May monthly TLD change-out, the location BRP-09 .
annual TLD was again reported missing. The missing TLD was suspected to have been misplaced or lost on site. It was never located. Another spare TLD was used for replacing the missing 1 annual TLD, however the spare replacement TLD eventually turned I out to be the (original) location BRP-08 annual TLD.
All spare / replacement TLD's were "normalized" (monthly, quarterly) for the amount of equivalent days in service. None of the missing TLD's involved any of the key indicator / control locations. The data values of those locations were entered into the SAS statistical program as standard data points.
The Big Rock Point gamma assessment program consists of 18 TLD locations: 5 directly onsite, 6 inner ring (site boundary), 3 outer ring (1.0 to 4.5 miles out), 3 control (10.5 to 50 miles out) and 1 TLD control placed in a lead storage cave. For 1987, the average .
)
monthly gamma readings were 4.0 mR for the inner ring (site i boundary) TLD's t 4.1 mR f or the outer ring (1 to 4.5 miles out)
TLD's t and 4.3 mR f or the control TLD locations. The lead cave control TLD recorded an average of 2.8 mR/ month. This is consistent with expected actual ef fluent releases. The 5 onsite TLD locations serve as individual reference sources only and are not collectively l evaluated. l l
The monthly and quarterly SAS statistical TLD data evaluations were accomplished by comparing the inner ring TLD's (site boundary locations BRP 09-13 and 16) and the outer ring TLD's (1.0 to 4.5 l miles out, locations BRP 02-04) against the control TLD locations i (BRP 05-07). The annual TLD data evaluation was done by a direct I comparison of data points only.
In comparing the inner ring TLD's to the control TLD's; the South-east site boundary (BRP 12, 0.9 mi) had the greatest monthly, quarterly and annual data means for an indicator location. When the same comparison was made between the outer ring and control location TLD's t Boyne City (6-BC,12.0 mi SE) had the greatest monthly and annual data means for an indicator location and Susan Lake (4-SC, 3.5 mi SE) had the greatest quarterly mean.
IC0488-0077A-HP01 Background and instransit gamma exposure levels were accounted for and subtracted from the TLD data prior to statistical evaluation.
No statistical or evaluating levels were exceeded and in many instances, control location TLD data was greater than near-site TLD data. BRP Technical Specification sensitivities were met.
Envir'onmental gamma doses are measured monthly, quarterly and annually by placement of 3 appropriately identified TLD badges per designated location. Each Teledyne TLD badge contains a 4-zone CaSO4 phosphor wafer (the wafer also includes an additional backup / reserve read-out zone). Sensitivity for the multi-zone TLD's are 0.5 millirem with a linear response of 0.1 millirem to 1000 Rem.
- 3. Hilk A total of 47 individual monthly milk samples were collected from 4 different dairy farms. Dairy farms 20-JC, 21-DK and 22-RH serve as indicator locations; and dairy farm 23-BB serves as a control location. The milk samples are obtained as grab samples only (dipped from the milk tanks).
Normally, a total of 48 monthly milk samples would be obtained from the 4 dairy locations, however the location 21-DK milk sample for October was unavailable. The loss of this sample did not severely diminish from the overall statistical evaluation of the milk results though.
Only the Sr-90 data was statistically evaluated, as all other isotopic activity results were below LLD. The Sr-90 evaluation level between the indicator and control locations was exceeded by 0.5 pCi/L. This factor is lower than in 1986 however.
Evaluation of SAS input data indicates that the Sr-90 activity levels were not caused by Plant effluents in thats
- a. No Sr-89,1-131 or Cs-137 activity (less than LLD) was present in either milk or air filter samples despite higher overall effluent ratios of 1.1, 17.2 and 1.5 times (respectively) higher to Sr-90 (including net unidentified beta).
- b. The J. Colovich dairy f arm (20-JC, 4.5 mi SE) appears.to have a higher than usual concentration of Sr-90 in milk than the other dairy locations. Colovich had a mean average of 6.3 pCi/L Sr-90 for 1987; the next highest diary location is the R.
McCraney dairy f arm (22-RM, 6.5 mi SE) with a 4.4 pCi/L Sr-90 mean. The Colovich dsta tends to "skew" the SAS statistical evaluation of the indicstor locations in comparison with the cont rol location, indica'.ing a f alse positive result.
IC0488-0077A-HP01
- c. The nearest dairy location to BRP (site) is the D. Kuebler dairy farm (21-DK, 2.5 mi E). The mean Sr-90 amount at that location was 4.0 pCi/L; this is 2.3 pCi/L less than at the Colovich dairy farm. The East sector also tends to have the highest X/Q meteorological data as well.
- d. There was no increase in the mean average of Sr-90 in the milk at the Colovich dairy farm between 1986 and 1987. Also, cabbage leaf samples taken at that location had minimal detec-table levels of Sr-90 activity present.
Milk samples are required monthly (usually collected by the 1st Thursday of the month) from each designated collection location (4 total). A two gallon quantity of raw milk (grab sample) is obtained per collection location in order to meet analyt ical requirement s.
Samples are treated with a sodium bisulfite (40 grams per gallon) preservative prior to being sent to Teledyne Isotopes for analysis.
- 4. Lake Water A total of 24 individual monthly take water composite samples were collected from 2 locations during 1987. Lake water samples f rom the Lake-in (plant intake) and the Charlevoix Hunicipal Water System are collected daily and composited into monthly samples.
Evaluation of the monthly lake water analytical results was based on a data means comparison between the Lake-in and the Charlevoix Municipal Water Department (control location). The lake water ;
results were also evaluated against BRP Technical Specification l reporting limits. l Five of the Lake-in composite samples (collected for the months of April, May, July, August and September) were deleted f rom the data means calculations because of being collected /composited in contami-nated containers. The analytical results are as follows:
April Lake-in gross beta - 10,0 pCi/L 3r cl.6 pCi/L Sr-90 -
0.9 pCi/L Cs-134 - 42.7 pCi/L ,
Cs-137 - 10.6 pCi/L '
other gamma - 42.6 pCi/L i
Hay Lake-in gross beta - 15.0 pCi/L i Sr-89 -
c2.5 pCi/L l Sr *0.7 pCi/L Cs-134 - 42.6 pCi/L Cs-137 - 19.7 pCi/L other gamma - 42.4 pCi/L IC0488-0077A-HP01
- July Lake-in gross beta - 10.8 pCi/L Sr 41.3 pCi/L Sr 40.7 pCi/L Cs-134 - 410.5 pCi/L .
Cs-137 - 413.8 pCi/L other gamma - 410.2 pCi/1, August Lake-i n gross beta - 5.8 pCi/L no other analyses done I
September Lake-in gross beta - 4.3 pCi/L no other analyses done Only the April, May and July Lake-in samples were analyzed for Sr-89/90 and the gamma isotopes becausc of the gross beta exceeding the 10.0 pCi/L action level. This is required by BRP Technical Specifications. The August and September Lake-in samples, though slightly contaminated, were reported with gross beta results below the action level. The sample composite containers were decontami- l nated prior to une for the October composite samples. There has l been no reported contamination of Lake-in samples since then. !
l Tritium and gross beta analyses are required for all lake water !
samples. The indicator and control location sample means were 4500 pCi/L (LLD) for tritium and 44.0 pCi/L (LLD) for gross beta.
Both lake intake, and Charlevoix Municipal Water samples are l collected daily for composite into a monthly sample. A one gallon quantity of sample is sent to Teledyne Isotopes for analysis. No t reat rent of the water samples with a preservative is necessary.
i
- 5. Well Water A total of 12 individual monthly well water samples were collected f rom the BRP site well during 1987. Effective April 6, 1987, the City of Charlevoix started drawing water from Lake Michigan. The city-owned well fields had to be closed due to chemical contamina-tion. Because of this water supply change, the Charlevoix monthly water sample data was evaluated with the other collected lake water sample data and not with the site well sample data (as was done in 1986). l It should be noted that the January - March Charlevoix water samples were drawn from the city well fields, but the tritium and gross beta results of those 3 samples are in the same range as the lake water samples. 1 Evaluation of the BRP site well samples is based on comparisons with Technical Specification reporting limits. Tritium and gross beta analyses are required for each monthly sample. For all well water samples, tritium results were 4500 pCi/L (LLD) and 44.0 pCi/L (LLD)
IC0488-0077A-HP01 . _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
for gross beta. No special or supplemental analyses were necessary during 1987.
A one gallon quantity of sample is sent to Teledyne Isotopes for analysis. No t reatment of the water samples with a preservative is necessary.
- 6. Crops The collection of food crops / vegetation samples is not required by the BRP Radiological Environmental Monitoring Technical Specifica-tions. There are no regular select locations where food crop (in season) samples are collected, however in order to verify stack effluent deposition patterns, several crop samples are usually obtained annually, if available, from sectors E SE, ESE or SSE.
For 1987, 3 crop samples from 2 different locations were collected
)
from the following locations: 1 i
- a. Cabbege leaves f rom the J. Colovich dairy f arm (20-JC, 4.5 mi j SE).
i
- b. Cauliflower / pepper leaves (mixed) from the D. Kuebler dairy j farm (21-DK, 2.5 mi E). )
i Samples were collected on September 10, 1987.
Evaluation of the crop sample analytical results was direct. All data was combined and reported. No control location was used. ,
I Of the isotopes listed on Table HP 10.2-2, only the Sr-90 analyses l resulted in any specific activity. All other analyses were less than LLD. Cross beta was not analyzed due to a laboratory error.
No BRP Technical Specification reportirg limits were exceeded'nor were any special/ supplemental analyses required during 1987.
Currently, food crop samples are not routinely collected like other sample media required by the BRP Radiological Environmental Monitor-ing Program. The samples are obtained seasonally, usually from the E, SE, ESE or SSE meteorological sectors and when specifically requested by either the BRP or RSD Radiological Environmental Coordinator. When collected, approximately 1 Kg of sample is placed in a sealable plastic bag for shipment to Teledyne Isotopes. No l special treatment of the food crop samples with a preservative is )
necessary.
- 7. Sediment A total of 9 individual sediment samples were collected from 3 locations during 1987. Two (2) sediment samples were obtained from the BRP discharge channell two (2) sediment samples f rom Nine Mile Pointe (2-NH, 3 mi ENE); and five (5) sediment samples from the IC0488-0077A-HP01 .
Ludington (North Jetty) control stati'on. Sediment samples are collected semi-annually.
Evaluation of the sediment analytical results was based on data means comparisons between the BRP/Ludington control samples and the BRP Technical Specification reporting limits. The individual BRP sample locations were combined into one indicator location for comparison purposes; however if any one individual sample location had a greater specific isotopic annual mean than the other loca-tion (s), then that location is identified on Table HP 10.2-2.
Of the isotopic analyses listed on Table HP 10.2-2, only Sr-89 and some of the non parameter other gamma isotopes were less than LLD.
All other analyses resulted in trace amounts of activity present.
It should be noted that the 9/26/87 discharge sample is listed as being an "indicator location" for Sr-89 activity due to an elevated LLD, even though the mean data for all indicator locations is *LLD.
The same data condition exists for the 6/11/87 discharge sample with elevated LLD's for Co-60 and Cs-137. 'this was a result of the laboratory usir.g too small a sample size. The Ludington control location reported a greater mean gross beta activity level than the BRP (site) locations.
No BRP Technical Specification action or reporting levels were exceeded, nor were any special or supplemental analyses required during 1987.
Sediment samples are collected semi-annually from each designated location. A one (1) liter quantity grab sample usually obtained a few yards off-shore. No treatment of the samples with a preserva-tive is necessary prior to shipment to Teledyne Isotopes.
- 8. Fish A total of 20 individual fish samples were collected from 6 loca-i tions during 1987. Fourteen (14) samples were obtained f rom BRP site area (discharge,1 mile South boundary, h mile North boundary, Mt. McCauba snd Nine Mile Pointe); and six (6) samples f rom the <
Ludingten (North Jetty) control station. Fish samples are collected !
semi-annually.
Evaluation cd the fish wnalytical results was based on data means l comparisons between the BRP/Ludington samples and the BRP Technical Specification reporting limit.t. The BRP individual sample locations j were combined into one indicator location for comparison purposes t ;
however if any one individual sample location had a greater specific '
isotopic annual mean than the other locations, then that location is identified on Table HP 10.2-2.
IC0488-0077A-HP01
. e Of the isotopic analyses listed on Table HP 10.2-2 only Sr-90 was present in trace amounts. All other isotopes (Sr-89 and other gamma) were less than LLD. The greatest level of Sr-90 was found in the Ludington control samples. No BRP Technical Specification reporting levels were exceeded nor were any special analyses re-quired dur}ng 1987.
As a minimum, at least two (2) di f f erent fish species (ie, forage, s po rt fish, etc) per designated location per year are collected. In most cases however, that criteria is exceeded. When caught, a one (1) Liter quantity of fish sainple is prepared for shipment to Teledyne Isotopes. Each sample is treated with 10 ml of a 10%
formaldehyde solution for preservation.
- 9. Aquatic Biota The aquatic biota category consists of: crayfish, algae and peri-phyton. A total of 24 individual samples were collected from 6 locations during 1987. Sample types and locations are as follows:
Crayfish: 6 samples BRP (discharge, I mile South boundary, 1 mile North boundary, Nine Mile Pointe, and Mt. McSauba). No samples were collected at Ludington control.
Algae: 9 samples BRP (discharge, i mile South boundary, i mile North boundary, Nine Mile Pointe and Mt. McSauba). Two (2) samples were collected at Ludington control (North Jetty).
Periphyton: 7 samples BRP (discharge, i mile South boundary,1 mile North boundary, Nine Mile Pointe, and Mt. McSauba). No samples were collected at Ludington control.
l Aquatic biota samples are collected semi-annually at all designated l locations, however due to inclement weather at the time of sample ,
collection and/or the high water levels of Lake Michigan, the !
following locations had either greatly reduced or non-existant l sample sized quantities of aquatic biota available: '
Crayfish: Unavailable at Mt. McSauba, I mile South boundary, a
discharge and Nine Mile Pointe during collection period 6/12/87.
Periphyton: Unavailable at Mt. McSauba and discharge during collec-tion period 6/12/87 and at Nine Mile Pointe during collection period 9/26/87.
Algae: Unavailable at discharge during the collection period 9/26/87.
I Evaluation of the biota analytical results was based on a data means comparison with the BRP Technical Specification reporting limits; and in the case of the algae samples, an additional comparison was made with the Ludington control samples. All the individual BRP l
IC0488-0077A-HP01 .
sample locations were combined into one indicator (site) location for comparison purposes; however if any one individual sample location had a greater specific isotopic annual mean than the other locations, then that location is identified on Table HP 10.2-2.
Of the isotopic analyses listed in Table HP 10.2-2 for crayfish, only the non parameter "other gamma" isotopes had cLLD activity.
There were trace amounts of activity present for all other anal,yses.
The discharge channel had the greatest annual sample mean for the reported isotopes. It should be noted that the 9/26/87 crayfish samples collected at the discharge, h mile South boundary and Nine Mile Pointe all had elevated Sr-89 LLD's (3 samples total) due to the analyzing cf too small a sample size.
For the periphyton isotopie results; again only the non parameter "other gama" isotopes resulted in <LLD activity. There were trace amounts of activity present for all other analyses. With the exception of Nine Mile Pointe having the grea, test annual sample mean for gross beta results, the discharge channel?was the highest indicator location for all analyses. It shou.d be noted that both the 6/10/87 and 9/25/87 periphyton samples collected at i mile North boundary; the 6/12/87 sample collected at Nine Mile Pointel and the 9/25/87 samples collected at the discharge and i mile South boundary locations all had elevated Sr-89 LLD's (5 samples total) due to the analyzing of too small a sample size for Sr-89.
The BRP algae samples were the only biota samples evaluated with a control station. As with the other biota isotopic analyses t only the "other gama" isotopes resulted in 4LLD activity (except for Hn-54 and co-60). There were trace amounts of activity present for all other analyses. The Ludington control location had the greatest annual sample mean for gross beta. The other indicator location for greatest annual sample means was f mile South boundary for Sr-90.
It should be noted that the 9/25/87 algae samples collected at i mile North boundary and 1 mile South boundary had elevated Sr-89 l LLD's (2 samples total) due to the analyzing of too small a sample l size for Sr-89. j No BRP Technical Specification action or reporting levels wer2 ;
exceeded, nor were any special or supplemental analyses required !
during 1987.
Aquatic biota samples (crayfish, algae and periphyton) are collected semi-annually at each designated location, however inclement weather and/or rough water conditions can either make collecting suf ficient sample quantities impossible or wash biota populations out of the imediate sampling vicinity. This situation occurred during 1987.
One (1) liter quantities of biota are sent to Teledyne Isotopes for analysis. Each sample is treated with 10 ml of a 10% formaldehyde solution for preservation.
IC0488-0077A-HP01 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
- 10. Broad Leaf Vegetation No broad leaf vegetation semples were collected from the surrounding BRP environs during 1987. The collection of broad leaf vegetation samples serves as a backup and/or alternative sampling media in case any milk sampling location (s) become(s) unavailable. There were no problems associated with the quantity or quality of milk samples for the 1987 reporting year.
C. As se s s ment of Big Rock Fo_i_nt 's Ope ra t i onal Envi ronment al Impact In reviewing the 1987 big Rock Point radiological environmental monitor-
' ing data and comparing it to previous operation and pre-operational data, all trending parameters continue to indicate that the operation of Big Rock Point has had an i:significant envi ronmental impact . Most isotopic concentrations are at envi rcnmental "backg round" radiat i on level s. Sin.e the Chinese stopped the open atmospheric testing of nuclear devices in late 1981-82, environmental background levels of raiiation (due to fallout) have shown a continuov- decrease. Evidenu of an environmental isotopic build up (attributable to plant ef fluents) appears negligible as well.
' The effect of the Chernobyl fallout (April 1986) en the 1987 milk, squatic biote and fish samples appears to be nil . No evidence of a significant tsotopic "build up" could be determined. In most cases, sample analytical results were below previously established environmental background levels.
ICu488-0077A-HP01 ___ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
s Enclosures A. Big Rock Point 1987 Land Use Census
,'1 B. Hea' T Physics Procedure 10.09: Big Rock Point Radiological Environ-mens.1 l'rogram Sample Collection and Shipment Procedure (with sample J/ locations, maps, etc.)
C. Big Rock Point 1987 (annual) Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Data as provided by Teledyne Isotopes Midwest Laboratory, North-brook, Ill.
D. Teledyne Isotopes Midwest Laboratory EPA Interlaboratory Comparison Program Results
' E. Data Craphs
- 1. Big Rock Point Air Particulate (gross beta) 1987 Trending and Big Rock Point Air Particulate (gross beta) 1982 - 1987 Operational Comparison Graphs
- 2. Big Rock Point TLD (gamma) 1987 Trending and Big Rock Point TLD (gamma) Monthly, Quarterly and Annual 1982 - 1987 Ope ra t ional Comparison Graphs ,
- 3. Big Rock Point Milk (Sr-90) 1987 Trending and Big Rock Point Milk (Sr-90) 1982 - 1987 Operational Comparison Craphs
- 4. Big Rock Point Well Water (gross beta) 1987 Trending i
- 5. Big Rock Point Lske Water (Intake vs. Discharge - gross beta and tritium) 1987 Trending and Big Rock Point Lake Water (Intake vs.
discharge - gross beta and tritium): 1960 - 1962 Pre-operation /1982
- 1987 Operational Comparison Craphs
- 6. Big Rock Point Fish (gross beta) 1987 Trending and Big Rock Point Fish (gross beta) 1982 - 1987 Operational Comparison Graphs (including Ludington Control 1984 - 1987)
- 7. Big Rock Point Sediment (gross beta) 1987 Trending and Big Rock Point (gross beta) 1982-1987 Operational Compar;oon Graphs (including Ludington Control 1984-1987)
- 8. Big Rock Point Aquatic Biota (crayfish, algae periphyton gross beta) 1987 Trending and big Rock Point Aquatic Biota; 1960 - 1962 Pre-operation /1982 - 1987 Operational Comparison Craphs (including Ludington Control 1984 - 1987 - algae only)
)
J
' l IC0488-0077A-HP01 _ - _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - . - - _ _ _ _ . ___ _.
_ __. m ._ -- -
BIG Rota P0lut mu(It4A POWER plant AmmuAt #AD1040EICAt f avi#0NM(NIAL OPtRAtleL. AtroRI Januany I to OtttMDER 31. 1987 f asti MP 10 2-1 SAMPaler. AND AnatV535 54peamy Ihsuber of Samples faequenty of '
_ seed 6u_m Descript6en tocateen (ellec ted type of Analysis An_a tys t s I Air (ontinuous at All: Stat 6ons 1-51 364 Gross Deta. 1-13I Wee 6ly Appros I (fM thru 7 TR t a6e I Gallon latate. Ja Gross Seta. M-3 peonthly Water Campostle Charlevels tiell 1 Gaston 5tte 12 Gross Seta. N-3 peonthly Water Grab Tomposite nell6 2 Gallsa JG.(m. AN. SS 4P l 131. Sr-89/90. (s-137 Honthly Grab 01her Gamma ItD tent 6nuous All: Stattens enP-03 214 Gem paimthly thru teP-IO 72 Quarterly 17 Annual (reps Grab Sectors SE. t 2 Gross Seta. 3 333. St-M/90 As Requested C$-117. Other Gamma aquetit Grab 885.115. Sim.1T. 858 24 Gross Beta. Sr 89. Sr-90 Seel Annual 86 eta tud6ngton Control (s-137. Other Gem iish Grab st5. 575. SIN. St. 888, 20 Gross Seta. Sr-59, ir-90 5ee 6- Annual tudington Control (%-137. Other Ga m Sediment Grab St. see, tudin9 ten Control 9 Gross Seta. Sr-99. Sr-90 5eet-Annual rs 131 ether Gamma Sel04E7 0024A-MPol
___.__.._m. ___. m__ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ --_ .--.w.-w - -~ , ~. m e - - 4 _. , , ,.. .. --.--r.-, - - - - - - , - . , e. .--,s
, _ . . . . _ . - ~ - . . - . - . -a - - ___ - - . _- ._ -- ._ _ . --- -- . - -
1 l
l t
1 BIG ROLE P0aml Isutti AA P0ut8 PtANI AnnuAt RA0lotGGl(At tavlAussetNIAL OPERAllesG alPURI JanuAar 1 30 0((18918 it.1987 IAtti teP 10.2 2 SAsirti DATA Sussanav l Analyses teatuated 0 cr tower itelt All All perdium or lotal humber of of lade (ator Locat ton with Greatest
_ Pat h=ar$ampled Analyses Perf ormed (omtrol Ibarcut ene unst of Measurement DitettteJnL t ot al tons Annualstraa{ej t ot at sons 8erasur seent s_
itD seren(b) Giane Stram(b) Otram(b) aangeth) Destance and Direct son aange(b) aange(b)
Air (p(6/m') t til 357/M4 0.07 206/20s itD ttD ISI/l% 110 Gross 8 eta kne l 3SI/M4 0.01 204/208 0.02 Soyne (tty (12 et il) 0.02 l 147/i % 0.02 (0.005-0.048) fraverse (4ty (50 806 (0.006-0.000) (0.006-0.0es) mune ,
15u)
ItD (mm) IID gesunthly)(g) 107/214 10.0 78/3I8 4.0 Sumtheast Site 4.9 inner sing M/M 4.3 mune (2.0 6.0) Soundary (0.9 e6) (4.4 6,0) ( 3.0- S. 3)
(site buvadary) ito (QuarterlyHg) 36/12 10.0 24/60 11.6 Southeast 54te 14.5 12/12 12.4 abne (9.9 15.4) Sounaary (0.9 e6) (33.3 15.4) (11.e.13.9)
ItD (Aaaval) 9/17 10.0 6/14 53.9 Southeast $tte 2).1 3/3 $7.8 Ihme (38.0-73.1) Soundary (0.9 et) ( 54. l .61.' 4 )
f10 (mm) ItD (8euntaly)(g) 12/214 10.0 M/l?S 4.1 Soyne City (12.0 e6 51) 4.2 outer Asag M/M 4.3 mone
_ (3.0.S.2) ( 3.5-5.1) (3.0 S.3)
Is0 (06arterlyHg) 24/12 (h) 10.0 12/60 12.0 Susan take (3.5 e6 58 ) 13.5 12/12 (h)l2.4 nune (30.4 34.3) (12.1 14.3) (13.0 11.9)
ItD (Annual) 6/87 (h) 10.0 3/14 %.8 toyne City (12.0 e6 SE) 68.4 3/3 (h) $7.8 home (52.7 60) ($4.1 61.4) aseln (s4 t/l) I.tla 47/47 1.0 3S/35 atD tt0 12/12 inD 'nune Sr .as9 47/47 S.O 3S/35 tt0 ttD 12/12 140 Sr.90= 47/47 1.0 35/35 4.9 J.Golovt(n (4.5 e6 51) 6.3 12/12 3.0 (2.2 - 8.2) (4.8-8.2) (1.9.S.4)
(s.137 47/47 18.0 35/35 atD ttD 12/12 11D Other Gamma 47/47 15.0 3S/M ttD ttD 12/12 140 see Sr.9u eilt eval.at 6en sa report to) %einal teuer t enit of Dete(s ton (stol as def 6med sa the $tg Sote Po$nt Iethettel Spet tf t(at$cas Iable 13.3 3 and vendor analyt 4(al (apabllliteg, (t ) stean and range based spun detettable measurements and/or vendor laboratory atD*s.
(c ) teoll mater is also drin& sag mater supply. (f ) hot required f or take water tatate.
(d) Suseleeratal sample unen ella os maavailable.
(g) stanthly Itp res.Its are normalered for 30 days met; Quarterly Ito ^
(e) See resers tag results for hegnest mean sampalag locat eca. results are normal 62ed for 91 days met.
(h) See it0 evaluattons 6e report narrat6 e.
! M19487.0016A-eirci I
i I
.--- . ~ . . - - . .- ..~.. ..._~. -. - _ . - - . ~ . _ _ . _ - _ . . _ _ = . _ = _ _ - - _ _ _ - . - - - - - . .
i
.i t
l SIG mott P0laf muttI Aa P0ut A Pt Amt I
, AmmuAt AADict0GICAt tavlsommemIAL OPERAIInG miPoni p
JanuARv i 10 Of(lmIM A 31. 1981 taett ser 10.2 21AssPtt DATA $4ASIAAT
- I
~
Analyses Evaluated Over lower alett All All
]
tardson oc Iotal muasser of of Indstatur Locat tan with Greatest Control munroutine
- Pathmag g led Analyse $ Performed __Dete(tlan(s) tot at 6cas Annual Stran{e) togetgang seraserement s late water (p(t/l) irttius 19/24 S00.0 *1/12 ILD ttD 12/12 atD 5ee take Water marrat6*e (f) Gross AlgAa n/A l.C m/A --
m/A m/A mune 4- Gross Seta 39/24 4.0 *F/12 tt0 LLD 12/12 (LD See late aseter massat 6,e
] (f)sr.89 3/3 S.0 3/3 Lt0 m/A m/A 5ee take water me sett.e
- (f)5r.90 3/3 1.0 3/3 ttD m/A m/A 5ce take Watet Itas rat see 3 Other Gamma 3/3 War 60us 3/3 440 LLD m/A See late Weter marret6.e
- 15.0 38.0 .
A I esell mater Gross Seta 12/12 4.0 12/12 LLD LID mone
- 1908/l)(()
I tretime 12 12 500.0 12/12 inD tt0 m/A mone j trops Gross Wta e/A l.0 m/A m/A m/A m/A mone .I
- (pct /9 het) l 3 131 2/2 0 06 2/2 41D ttD m/A mone j Sr.89 2/2 0.025 2/2 4LD LtD m/A mune
~
i Sr.90 ./2 0.005 2/2 0.038 0 suenter fare 0.022 m/A mone i
- (0.013 0.022) (2.5 al ()
]
Other Ganna 2/2 var 6ous 2/2 atD 110 m/A mune 1 0.00-8.10 j = April stay, J.1,. A., st and Septoma er Issi tame in .ater caus+sete saneles were 6aad.ertently collected .6th contm6aated sample containers: analysis .ai.es .er, deseted ,
f rom mean evalmet 6cas.
(a) mustaal tower a sett of Detettlen (LLD) as def 6ned la the 86g mott Potat lethalcal 5pe(Stitations Table 13.3-3 and vendur analyt4(al (apas>616ttes.
(ii) seven and range teased econ detectable measurements and/or senar analytttet itD's.
(c) anell .ater is anse dr6ma nag ater s pply. (f) not required for late water tota 6e.
j (d) lut+1eetatal sample when allt is unavailable. (g) Itunthly itD resmits are moraalised for 30 days net; (baarterly ItD (e) See reporting results f ee utgmest era sampling lutat ion. results are moreelued for 98 days net.
s se!U481.Duft.A sePUI
(
_.- - - - , . _ . , ,..-,.,r.....,u , , .. ,,-__-, _ ,c. , - . . - . ,, - ..
. . . . - . = . .. .__n . , . - .~_ . ._ - _ .~. _ _ _ _ .. _ ._ _ - -.
glG acta Polmf mV(LIAR POWE8 plant AmmuAt RADIOLOGilAt tavlRossilmIAt OPtOAIIIsG AIPURT
,JanuaRT I 30 0ftfeetR 31. 1981 IA8tf MP 10.2 2 inserit DAIA SUI 8stRV Analyses I=aluated Over tower atelt All All seedium er Total mue er of of Ind ac ator tocatton utth Greate*t Control E nroutene
, Fath.ay h ted Analyseg Performed Detett6cniaj_ to:altons Annual tiran(e) to(attens Sedleent Gross Br1a 1.0 8.7 serasureernt s_ ,
S/S 4/4 todtagten (entrol 9.3 S/S 9.3 soone (p(t/g Dry) ( 4. 3.17.5 ) (120 el SW) (5.6-34.3) (S.tv.14.3)
Sr 89 8/8 0.025 4/4 (LD 06u harge 0.027 (0.027) S/S ttD See lediment b reatsee Sr-90 8/3 0.005 4/4 0.006 tus.engton (catrol 0.010 S/S 0.010 kne
(*0.005-0.007) (120 et SW) (=0.805-0.028) ( 0.005.0.0281 l (s.I)7 8/8 0.18 4/4 0.23 Otuharge 0.38 S/S sto See sedueent karats.e
(-0.18 0.59) (0.17 0.S9) i l Co-60 8/8 0.0% 4/4 0.24 Otst%erge 0.46 S/S 44 0 See sedteent maseats.e l ( 0.05.0.18) (0.84 0.78)
Other Gasma 8/8 various 4/4 at0 tid S/S ttD mone 0.05 0.15 -
, ftsh (ptt/g het) Isross Seta 20/20 1.0 14/14 2.I 1/4 Ist South 2.4 6/6 2.3 anone
! (l.S-2.8) (2.3 2.6) ( 3.S. 3. 7 )
[
Sr.89 20/20 0.02S 14/14 atD 110 6/6 atD mone 5r.90 20/20 0.00S 14/14 0.004 tudington (catrol 0.009 6/6 0.009 mone
( 0.002 0.014) (0.002-0.022) (0.002 0.022)
(s.337 20/20 0.15 14/14 atD tt0 6/6 110 kne Other Gamma 20/20 vartous 14/14 atD 110 6/6 180 mune 0.10-0.26 trayf tsh Gross Seta 6/6 1.0 6/6 7.0 Otu harge 4.5 (4.5) mone A atlebte mune (p(t/g met) (0.82-4.5) l Sr.89 6/6 0.32S 6/4 0.69 01u harge 0.073 (0.073) mone A.a68aele See Ao.atoc Seeta
(=0.016 0.073) krrative Sr 90 6/6 0.005 6/6 0.327 Cluharge 0.560 mone A allable flune (0.14 0.56) (0.S60)
Co-60 6/6 0.13 6/6 44 0 plu harge 0.34 ( 0.34) mone A allable Stone sen 54 6/6 0.11 6/6 IID 06 u ha.9e 0.22 (0.22) stone A.allable kne 01her Ganea 6/6 eertous 6/6 4&D LtD mone A.a6Iaole nume l
0.10 4.26 i (4) numinal tower t oest of Detett 6an (tto) as orfined on the 8sg Rut 6 Potat lethal (al Spe(iftgat6ang table 1).3 3 and wendor analytkal (apab$lities (b) sar an and range based spun actettable measurements and/or vendor analyt kal itD*s. *
(() teell =ater es also dr$nasag water sus,1y. (f) ht requ6 red for take mater tntake.
(d) topplemental sample when e6th is ena.astable. (g) shsnthly ttD results are normaltaed for 30 days art; Quarterly 310 (el See regert eng results for 66ghest mean saapitag late eton. results are normalised for 91 caps net.
i r:0407. Oul64..e0:
l l
- ._ _ . . _ _. - - m o .
I 1 '
-t ; &
t
! = 2 1}I *
-t I
xt l M: I b5 hbbb b5kbbbbb t
Ie ,
S A -
- {i ' .
99 8 ....... -*
-tXe*o
-s ae: 6:: $do o o
} } } } } } $ t 53 : .? . 2 .:
2 &
. .! -C i~
- k k~
~ ~ ~ ~
k k k k t t 2 8 & M M M M t t I II :
~ i g ,
s ; -
a g c *9 3 2 E ^
{.$.*
4 a a
- C m*
- R 4 a g 4 - -
bu3 C
- &*gEs4?g?
g4**s 9
-2 "4 3. 4 8 1 g, --o-o-o-o-
. o o o a-~- 3, 4g.=
.. g,8 01 1 #l3 e a' I- t 5-1 2 I 1.3 1 .=T E 3 ^1_ b- s : 1 8
i n 3::
-v 3 5 3} 3 ) I 2EE & & & & 2 h3 3 '
5:~ I i- - - -
s3 N3 52 33 E3 2 To.
-21 23- 1.g I
- E E E I. t S. t *=4 '
,s gas -- - - - =-o a o o a S. -
g CG*5 g .1, =,
6C
~
E C 5 ~
- - ~S gE"-
- y a e 4 -
- E - - $ *- 2 s e ea *e C 4 e -:
z J Et ,
t
- ; A
- R
- A -
- L3 3-3 h 4,* *0kO8.*.* E y%{k'*F4fk glo - o ?*.dN?-*
-5.5 -o-o-o N** '
=--g 23"2 S. ~-o.?N4.-?.*.*.kd.3
- 73- ,** ,
2 b * *.
Igs: 1.
i eg s 5; a e ee e& ee e e a ee ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
% >% % % 2 21 5
gI I : 3 33 2 ) e]
1 1
1 ;51 3 s 4$hN 5 : 9 * = $$ 3 4 hh$ 6
- 5 *
- 5 j$ e 21 1'
l :s ,x e i
d a *3
. s
~
t
}U
- r !
4 i : : : : : : 1g 2!
a > 3 a m t t t t ; t t 3 - - - - - - - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - , 1,. s .
3 s ti &I
- emI15
-s I
- O ) C' }jb*.
.:q.
$s
. .. .1 3 32 . 3 , .ca ,r e: 3 3 3 :: s a s s 3 g a : 2 s y i
3iiib a s i i 6 i b s 8{1s5;a I .
4 l 22gIl.
5ft 8: $ i
.l '$. ia : lill i ;
A15 ;
e i1:1.
8
- g L M&2A5 y
. t it --- o a
E 2- 38333 E 1 ,
= >
. -_. _~~.. _. . _ . . - - _ .- ._-_ ~ - - . _ . _ - - = - - _ . . . . - - . _. .
_ - _. - - - .. - _ = . ~ . . - .
o
( -
SIG 8(KE P0thf taWtf As Pttsf A PL ANI AIssuAt AA0 lot 0Gl(At f ew!R00setalAt OPERAIING RtP0AI JeslutRY I 10 Di(Esett 33. 1987 IApti MP 30.2 2 SAstrif DAIA SisseARY Analyses toalvated Over tower 16ett All att 8erdous or total Ilumher of of Ind.<ator tocat 6on With Greatest Cent rol aimroutsee
- Pete=a d ampled _ Analy_se1Performed _Detegt6ca(e) tot at tens Annual peaiej_ tecet 6 ens seras_ureeret s__ i troad test weg Gross sets 3.0 no mies collected no samples coIInted none (PCl/gtort)(d) 8 131 0.06 l
Sr 89 0.025 "
I 5r.en c.005
- i Ot her C- Wertous j 0.08 0.30 I
l tal No.aal to.er t sets of cetattaa (tto) es def 6aed in the es, acca Pos. Tech.6c I sem ificat to.s tale 33.3 3 d .e.aor a.al,tscas capansletees. ,
l (b) faram and f ange based espan detectable messerseemts and/or wendor analytical ILD's.
(<> weil .ater es ais. dri ai., .eier s w i,. efI et re ired ror t a , ier i.t a e. ;
(d) Supplemental sample when ella is unevellatte.
(gp stethly ItD results are normalised for 30 days net! Omerterly itD (e) See report tag results for highest seen sampling locat 6ce. 895 ells are normellied for 9) days met.
l
(
i se10487-00?6A esPOI '
1 1
_,..-_--_---_---.,,.-rn, - ~,,--.,.r ------ --r. - - e - - - - - , , n- . - -, --,- . - - - - - w -- , . -w-, ----n-- r - - , --.-, - . -
_ .m._. ___m.__ ._ .____z____m.__m___.. ._ _ . . - . . _ _ . _ _ . . ~ . _ _ _ . . . m._m.._. . _.__ _ _._ _. .. _m _ _ _
f a
1 SIG A0(t Point muCti AR P0uta Plant Ammust RAD 10tOGI(At tavlRosseteIAt Orf aATING MPont Januent I to M(Isett 31. 1997 Imett ser 10.2 3 selGn.10m Ase Mme i
t MPontinG M5utI5 f en Gat Altst est Ass $asertles 10CAIIDIs I
suretuo t ype_o# Ana3 ses toratton setp ta. seean A 6r (gtt/e') 1 311 ttD .. ..
- 0.07 ;
Gross Seta Soyne (lty (ll et if) 0.006 0.006 0.02 fraverse (4ty (50 et 55m)
I '
ItD (es) Ito (thanthly)(5) Southeast Site soundary (0.9 et) 6.0 4.4 4.9 Inner Ring itD (Quarterly HS) Southeast Site Soundary (0.9 mi) 15.4 33.3 14.5 (stte t w ry) ftD ( Annwat) Southeast Site Soundary (0.9 el) .. ..
73.7 t i
ItD (ap) 110 (esonthly)(5) Boyne (sty (17.0 et 5f ) 5.3 3.5 4.7 Outer stag Ito (0.arterly)(5) sesan ta6e (3.5 et SE) 34.3 17.1 33.5 '
- itD ( Annual) Sorne (4ty (17.0 el $1) -- -.
61.4 i
i Mtin (pCl/l) 1-131 it0 .. ..
al.8 i
Sr 89 ttD .- --
=5.0
, Sr.90 J.Golevich (4.5 at 51) 8.2 4.8 6.3
! (s.337 4t0 .- -
alt.0
- I (s.134 ttD .. ..
35.0 Other Gam 11D .- .-
al5.0 I
j take water letttwo itD .. .. =500.0 I (ple/I) Gross Algaa(4) ttD . ..
al.0
- Gross Beta ItD .. .. =4.0 q 51 89(4) IID .. .
5.0 4
Sr.90(4) (10 .- ..
=l.0 mell Water Irttlum (1D - -. =500.0 i (gtt/l) Gross beta itD .. .. e4.0 '
i i
(3) samples toilettee to season (en request) l (2) ?.o samples ser locat son (tellected samt. annually) i (3) Supplemental sample when allt is unavailable j (4) amtree for enP etscherge only '
(5) saunthly itD res=Its are normaltree for 30 ears net; *
(>sarterly itD results are normaltsee for 93 days net.
j M10407-00264 NP05 2
i i
f
)
1 1
i
.- .a_~-.~----.. . - - _ _ . . - - . -- - - - - =a . . -. +- -,- _ . . .. a .- - . -. . . - -~ _ _ -
l -
o O!G ROLa Point suKtiAt Ptadta PtAmt AsuluAt mADl0t0Gilat turlA0NMINIAt OPIAAlleG RtPURI !
JAsasARv I 10 Of(fsofA 35. 1987 IAtti seP 10.2.) HIGef, ((Rf AND 00 AM pf P0pilHG M$ULI5 80R GRf Attil fel AN 5AMPtlHG 100A110N sardium i I p of Analysts loc at 6ca y N Ic= earea (rops Gross Seta N/A -- -- --
(s<4/g Iset)(I) Sr-89 41D - --
<0.025 5r-90 0 amebler Iare (2.5 el () -- --
0.022 ;
f.Ill it0 -- -
=0.06 Other Gamma stD -- --
- 0.00-0.30 '
5edlerat Gross Seta todtagten (120 et 14.3 5.6 9.3 (pCl/g Ory)(2) Sr.09 ap6u harge -- --
0.027 6
5r-90 tud6agten teatrol (120 ml Sa0 0.020 =0.005 0.010 l
(s-!)7 Otunarge 0.59 0.37 0.10 Co-60 Deuharge 0.70 0.84 0.46
- Other Gamma Allit0 -. --
=0.05 f 6sm Gross Seta 1/4 886 South 2.6 2.1 2.4 (p(t/g teet)(2) Sr 09 All itD -- --
=0.025 5r-90 todtagten (120 at SW) 0.022 0.002 0.009 ,
ts-I37 ttD -- -- *0.15 01ha- Gamma &t0 -- -.
- .10-0.26 (1) Samples (cIlec ted in season (en request)
(2) Iwo samples per locatten (collected seat.aanvally)
(3) Supplemental sample when elle 6s one.allable (4) neguired for ear stuharge only (5) eksethly ILD results are normatsred for 30 ears met Quarterly Ilp resmits are normalised for 98 eers set.
l .
esI0407-0076A-ter01
, . - - . - . - . _ _ - , - - - - , . . - . - - , - - - . . m - , . - . . , . -we-.- .r,--r, . . , _ . --
_ --.-e- , . . . - - -. -- .-r., ., .rn--. -
- _ .-- --
.-.._m.m_._ _ _ _ .. . . - -- - , . - . . - . _....____s._ . _ _ . _ . _ _ _ . _ _ . __ _ _ _ _.m . - . m,m -m . . _ - _ .
o J .
4 SIG SOCE P0lut teKtt AR POWER Plant i Akuunt SAOffMGGI(At anVIR0ssetmIAt OrtmAlles at*0Rt j JesumRV i 10 Of(IsS(R 31. 1981 148tl IIP 10.7-3 MIGM. 40W AND NtAh j AIPURIING M5utT5 FOR t.ps Altst seam SasertinG IOLAtates
, seedtue type _o# Analysts t oc et ton M_tgh to= eeren j (rayftsh (2) Gross Sete Disthtrge -- --
4.5 j (pt4/g teet) 5r-89 Otuharge -- -- 0.01) i s Sr.90 Otuharge -- --
0.560 4
a (e-60 Otu ha ge -- -- 0.34
- sen.54 Osuhe ge -. -.
0.77 Other Games (to -- --
- 0.10-0.26
]
~
j Algee (p(t/g teet) (2) Gross Seta todtag:en (entret (170 et SW) 2.2 0.9 1.6 t Sr.99 3/4 et nortn 9.10 *0.006 0.053
$r-ed 1/4 et Seeth 0.024 0.017 0.030 -
? Co-6u 1/4 e' mort h 0.94 =0.061 0.50 i sh.54 t/4 e 4 mor t h 1.52 <0.11 0.62 Y Other Gamma 4t0 -- -- *0.10-0.26 d
Periphyton (?) Gross Deta a6er 64tle PetMe -- -. 4.g i (p(t/g eset) Sr.89 Ots.harpe -- -- 8.15 Sr.90 On sharge -- --
0.35 (s.137 OH uherge -- -- 0.25 f sk.54 fsu harge -- --
31 f (e-60 Jiuharge -- --
2.80 j Other Gamme 160 -- -- =0.10-0.26 1
,. pread Leaf veg (3) 8 13I Ik> Samples (ellected j (g49/g teet) St-99
. Sr.90 Other Gamma
}
1 i
(I) Samples collected 6a season (or reg =est)
(F) fue samples ser lotet son (co',etted sont-ennually) f (3) Supplencatet sample when e'et is one=ellable j (4) aeguired for ser deu her p emis
- (5) feontaly it0 results are moreell:ed for 30 days net;
} Quarterly 1:0 resents are nursellred for 91 days net.
I d
i j ml0481-00264 seP01
,1 .
I
+
n i
i I
i
. _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ . , . . . . . - . . . . _ . - . . mm-.,_- ,-w. . - - - - - . . . . , , , , , ~.. . ~y. . .., , ,. . . , .-. , , , , , ., .,m, ,.
4 To RLBurdette, Big Rock Point plpl From MAMoore,tPalisades CONSUMERS POWER Date December 10, 1987 COMPANY Subject BIG ROCK POINT- Internal 1987 LAND USE CENSUS Correspondence CC JLBeer, Big Rock Point H AN87 *018 DCC: 740/72*10*03/LP The attached tables and map are the results of the Big Rock Point Land Use Census conducted June 9, 1987. Table 10.11-1 references the distance from Big Rock Point to the nearest residence, garden, beef / dairy cattle and goat per meteorological sector. Table 10.11-2 identifies the locations of the nearest residences all gardens (greater than 500 square feet) within a three (3) mile radius of the plant, and all beef / dairy cattle within a five (5) mile radius of the plant. The only goats located while conducting the 1987 Big Rock Point Land Use Census were in the SSE sector at the 3.25 mile limit. Table 10.11-3 lists the critical receptor locations used'in calculstion of offsite doses by the CASPAR computer program. An accompanying map illustratas Table 10.11-2.
Prior to conducting the 1987 Big Rock Point Land Use Census, both the Charlevoix County Agricultural Extension Of fice and Consumers Power Company Northern Regional Office were contacted on June 5, 1987 as required in Pali-sades Procedure HP 10.11. With the exception of several goats being observed, there were few changes f rom the 1986 Land Use Census.
If you have any questions, please contact me.
Reviewed and Approvedt 2a / / .27[f)
TPNeal, RMC Administrator Date i
I l
l 1
IC1287-0256A-HP01 d
O o .
1 BIC ROCK POINT LAND USE CENSUS REPORT TABLE 10.11-1 Distance to the nearest residence, garden, mil.k cow, beef cow and goat in each sector.
SECTOR RESIDENCE CARDEN DAIRY COW BEEF CATTLE CCAT WSW 2.5 mi >5 mi >$ mi >$ mi >5 mi SW 1.1 mi >5 mi >5 mi >5 mi >5 mi SSW l.3 mi 2.1 mi >$ mi >5 mi >5 mi S 1.9 mi >5 mi >5 mi 2.5 mi >$ mi SSE 1.7 mi 1.8 mi 3.5 mi 3.5 mi 3.25 mi SE 1.7 mi >5 mi 4.5 mi 2.0 mi >5 mi ESE 1.5 mi 2.4 mi 2.6 mi 2.6 mi >5 mi E 1.4 mi 2.5 mi 2.5 mi 2.5 mi >5 mi ENE 2.3 mi >$ mi >5 mi 25 mi >5 mi i
IC1287-0256A-HP01
. - _- . - _. -- _ = - .- - .-. .. - - . - -
i 2 i
. l l l BTC ROCK POINT LAND USE CENSUS REPORT !
TABLE 10.11-2 1
Locations of nearest residence 1 of all gardens greater than 500 square feet ,
! within a three mile radius of planti and all beef / dairy cattle within a .
five mile radius of plant. ,
l Sector and Road Location Description Item Numbe r / Commen t l WSW Birchwood Ranch Shores Residence 1 McSauba North Point !
SW Lackin's residence Residence 1 Dirt Road (Birchwood Ranch Shores) !
l !
Dirt trail off of Martin i Rd i
SSW Edward K. Shanahan, Residence 1 :
Private Drive Private drive North ot !
US-31
)
SSW Robert Burns, Carden 1 l y
Boyne City Road South side of road adj. t I to Mfg Nat'l Bank ;
j pro pe rt y J
, S C. Skeel, Residence 1 North (dead) end North of Boyne City Road of See Road .
S D. Buckner, 8398 See Road, Cattle 2-beef I See Road Approx. 250' South of See !
Road and Boyne City Road l
intersection. ;
t
! SSE Robert Dyksterhouse, Residence 1 Private drive West of Old US-31, adj Carden 1 I
Susan Lake l SSE Hoxie, Box 411 Carden 1 Shrigley Road Shrigley Road 1 l
- SSE Lester Umlar Farms, Cattle 30-becf l Intersection of Southwest corner of i Boyne City and intersection
- Quarterline Roads i
e 3
l 1 IC1287-0256A-HP01 l
i 1
4
.-,-,,,,,,.-m,, _ - - , - - - , ~ - - - - . .
O e 3
TABLE 10.11-2 (Cont'd)
Sector and Road Location Description item N umbe r / Commen t i
SSE Jerry & Hazel Haggerty Cattle 8-dairy Intersection of Farms, Southeast corner Doyne City and of intersection Quarterline Roads SSE John Haggerty Farm, Coats 4 Intersection of Northeast corner of Boyne City and intersection Quarterline Roads 4
SE Daniel & Rebecca Berg, Residence 1 Intersection of Old Route 3 Southwest corner US-31 and Smith Road of intersection SE Ceorge Smith, Cattle 2-beef _
Smith Road End of Smith Road, South of Old US-31 SE R.M. Jess, 407 Shrigley Cattle 8-beef
, Intersection Old Southeast corner of I US-31 & Shrigley Rd intersection I
! SE Betty Straw, Cattle 6-beef i Intersection of Northeast corner of
~
Burgess and intersection Quarterline Roads SE Lee Sneathen, Jr. Farms, Cattle 20-beef
, Intersection of West side of intersection 4-dairy Maple Grove and
- Dalton Road SE
- John and Shirley Colovich, Cattle 38-dairy Maple Grove between East side of Maple Crove Rd. 5-be e f Quarterline and Dalton Road intersections l ESE J. Bowman, Burgess Road, Residence 1
- Burgess Road 1 mile South of US-31 ESE CM Carden 1 i Upper Bay Shore Road 1 mile East of Upper Bay Shore and Burgess Road 4 intersection (South side of i road)
I 1 ESE C. Hamlin, Rt.3, Carden 1 i
Burgess Road East side of Burgess Road IC1287-0256A-HP01 1
i
- O 4
i TABLE 10.11-2 (Cont'd)
Sector and Road Location Description Item N umbe r / Co mmen t ESE L W Kuebler, ) mile East Cattle 12-beef Upper Bay Shore Road of Upper Bay Shore and (North side of road) Burgess Rd Intersection ESE Merle Hand, 304 Upper Bay Cattle 6-beef Upper Bay Shore Road Shore Rd, } mile West of 3-dairy Upper Bay Shore and Maple Crove Road (South side of I road) 1 ESE Ed Smally, Box 3148, West Cattle 1-dairy Stolt Road end (turnaround area) of 5- be e f Stolt Road, 3/4 mile from intersection of Stolt and Maple Crove Road ESE Thomas Hamlin, Northeast Cattle 3-dairy Stolt Road corner intersection of 9-beef Stolt and Murry Roads E Ralph J. Purvis, } mile Residence 1 Burgess Road South of intersection of Burgess and US-31 E Leo Burnett, Northwest Carden 1 Maple Grove Road corner of intersection of short dead-end road and i Maple Crove Roadt } mile South of US-31 i
E
- Dan Kueble r Farms, Cattle 13-beef I Upper Bay Shore Road 1 mile East of Upper Bay 15-dairy Shore and Burgess Road Carden 1 intersection (North side of road)
E T. McClellan, Northeast corner Cattle 1-beef Intersection of Maple of intersection of Maple Crove 1-dairy Grove and Upper Bay and Upper Bay Shore Road Shore Road E Hiram & Margaret Steward,i Cattle 7-dairy Upper Bay Shore Road mile East of intersection of Upper Bay Shore Road and Burnett Road IC1287-0256A-HP01
O b 5
F i
TABLE t.0.11-2 (Cont'd) 4 1
I l' Sector and Road Location Desc ript ion Item N umbe r /Commen t E Raymond Crif fin, Northeast Cattle 3-dairy "
l Intersection of Upper corner of intersection 30-beef ;
i Bay Shore and Murry i Roads i E John Murry, Southeast corner Cattle 3-beel Intersection of Upper of intersection Bay Shore and Murry l Roads
! E John Spelgel, West corner cattle 2-beef Intersection of Murry of intersection l Road and Old US-31 ENE Werner Cunningham, South side Residence 1 US-31 of US-31, 2.3 miles east of l BRP Plant l i
j
- Notet Current milk sampling locations.
- I
)
I
, i i
i i
I 1
l i !
1 I !
)
I Icl2a7-0256A-HP01 1
1 1
O t 6
BIC ROCK POINT LAND USE CENSUS REPORT TABLE 10.11-3 Critical Receptor Identification Distance Sector (miles) Location / Description item * **X/Q ( s ec /m')
E 0.6 **Lexalite Plastics Corp. Factory 4.20E-08 E 1.4 Ralph J. Purvis, i mile Residence / 5.00E-08 South of intersection of Carden Burgess and US-31 E 0.57 Site Boundary N/A 4.20E-08 E 2.50
- Da ra Kueble r Fa rms , 1 mile Beef Cattle 3.60E-08 East of Upper Bay Shore and Dairy Cows Burgess Road intersection (North side of road)
SSE 3.25 John Haggerty Farm, inter- Coats 2.40E-08 section of Boyne City and Quarterline Roads
- Current milk sampling locations.
- Not used as critical receptor location in BRP CASPAR program, however factory is adjacent to site boundary and staffed 24-hours per day.
- Based on BRP 3 year composite meteorological data, 1984-86.
IC1287-0256A-HP01
1
. . 1
~
. s .t r fm.k '
T l,I fj o (
, /gj g/
.(~ ,
,;7";- m i
e g/
, (
og &&W6M i
..~" .:
,u ,.
- i ,
i
, h-
- 4 f* ' )
O ,* i 'j
[ o~ .
. , . . . I g/
- . ur+1 k I'
g
- ,.>,... //
y l'(' ;
3 w' .. .
.jk= ~ -
- 6 1 g
(
q a -
[', _
} }/ ,T~
g _.
- < ,n n, =9 -
t l
(.
1 3
h~~"'s 1
,s,Y 1
4 \
g a a ww w/
- k i_
.s.
\in m ... %~na.p g
i.
i
=
S __ _
k
\
~ I)
AN f' I
+d s ;
E O- ie e g
y E
. %W _
_. = % i f E %8 8 5 x = l 5 m
7 2t a % 3) A a 1.8 a a O A e k 4 3
_ _ - - - - _ _ . _ _ _ . - - . * - - ~ ~ '~
PALISADES NUCLEAR PLANT Proc N3 HP 10.9 HEALTH PHYSICS PROCEWRE tevisicn 0 Page i TITLE BIC ROCK POINT RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL l C, PROGRAM SAMPLE COLLECTION AND SHIPMENT Table of Contents E.*L*.
1.0 PURPOSE . .. .......................... 1
2.0 REFERENCES
. . .......................... 1 3.0 PREREQUISITES .......................... 1
- 4. PRECAUTIONS AND LIMITATIONS . ......... ....... .. 1 5.0 PROCEDURE .. .......................... 2 5.1 REMP AIR SAMPLE COLLECTION . . ... ...... ....... . . 2 5.2 REMP WELL (DRINKINC) WATER SAMPLE COLLECTION -
CHARLEVOIX, MICHICAN . . . .. ... ....... ... ... .. 4
~
5.3 REMP MILK SAMPLE COLLECTION . ............. ... . . 5 i l
5.4 REMP AQUATIC BIOTA COLLECTION ... ...... ... .... .. 5 5.5 REMP SEDIMENT SAMPLE COLLECTION ......... ...... .. 6 5.6 REMP TLD SAMPLE COLLECTION . . ................. . 7 6.0 ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA ..... ... ...... ....... .. 9 ,
7.0 RECORDS AND ATTACHMENTS ...... ...... ... . .... . 9
{
7.1 RECORDS . ..
.......................... 9 7.2 ATTACHMENTS .
.......................... 9 ATTACHMENTS Attachment 1 "Big Rock Point Environmental Sample Collection Schedule" Attachment 2, "Big Rock Point Sampling Locations" Attachment 3. "Sample Identification" Attachment 4, "Sample Packaging and Shipping" i Attachment 5. "Big Rock Point Sample Collection Forms" l 1
\ 1 l
I g
a e hp1285-0111g-91-154
PALISADES WUCLEAR PLANT Proc Wo HP 10.9 HEALTH PHYSICS PROCEDURE Revision 0 Page 1 of 9 TITLE BIC ROCK PO!WT RADIOLOCICAL ENVIRONMENTAL PROCRAM SAMPLE COLLECTION AND SHIPMEdT 1.0 PURPOSE 1.1 To provide methcdology for collection, identification and shipment of ,
environmental samples in support of the Radiological Environmental !
Monitoring Program (REMP).
2.0 REFERENCES
2.1 Big Rock Point Technical Specifications 13.21 Table 13.3-1.
2.2 Regulatory Guide 4.15(7) 2.3 10 CFR 50, Appendia I 2.4 Nuclear Operations Department Procedure 805, "Radiological Environmental Monitoring."
2.5 Palisades Administrative Procedure 7.08, "Radiological Environmental Program Administrative Controls" 2.6 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Proaram Sample Shipping Manual, Teledyne Isotopes Midwest Laboratory, Rev 2, September 20, 1985 3.0 PREREQUISITES As indicated in Procedure 4.0 PRECAUTIOWS AND LIMITATIONS 4.1 This procedure shall be applicable to Big Rock Point CHP, Radiological Services Department, Environmental Service Department and any l contractual personnel assigned to collect or evaluate REMP samples.
4.2 Any revisions to this procedure shall be reviewed against Big Rock Point Technical Specifications to verify compliance to all l requirements.
4.3 Deviations from the required sampling schedule shall be documented in the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report.
4.4 Every effort shall be made to complete corrective action on mal-functioning sampling equipment prior to the end of the next sampling period.
4.5 If it is not possible to obtain the required samples, suitable
- alternative media and locations shall be substituted within 30 days.
I 1
l l
hp1285-0111a-91-154 l
l
._ __ _ _ - _ _ _~ .- _ - ___
- l PALISADES WUCLEAR PLANT Proc No WP 10.9 HEALTH PHYSICS PROCEDURE Revision 0 I Page 2 of 9 j
_ TITLE BIC ROCK POINT RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRAM SAMPLE COLLECTION AND SHIPMENT l l
l 4.6 Samples shall be collected, prepared and shipped for analysis in a l timely manner to preserve integrity. Other specific handling precautions for sample media are indicated in Section 5.0 as required.
5.0 PROCEDURE NOTE: Collect samples using the following methodology in accordance with schedule and location data described in Attachments 1 and 2. '
5.1 REMP AIR SAMPLE COLLECTION 5.1.1 Precautions
- a. New filters and cartridges should be transported and handled such ,
that potential contamination of them is minimited (ie, placed in l clean plastic bags, etc). i
- b. If an air sampling unit is discovered not operating, attempt to find the cause and repair. If this cannot be done, replace applicable component and document on air sample collection data l sheet.
- c. Airflow meters shall be calibrated annually by General Meter. All inservice air meters will have affixed a valid calibration ,
sticker / card stating date of calibration, calibration due date and initials of technician perf orming calibration.
- d. Airflow meters will be changed out prior to the empiration of calibration dates. Replacement air meters are available f rom the BRP Radiological Environmental contact.
- e. If air leakage is observed requiring the replacement of an airflow meter, contact either the BRP or RSD Radiological Environmental contact within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> of changeout. Document on air sample collection data sheet.
1 5.1.2 Prerequisites i a. Class fiber air filters
- b. Absorbent cartridges for iodine sampling
- c. Classine envelopes
- d. REMP air sample data sheet (containing installation data)
- e. Replacement air sample meters (as required) l hp1285-Ollla-91-154 1
)
PALIS ADES KUCLEAA PLANT Proc No HP 10.9 HEALTE PHYSICS PROCEDURE Revision 0 i Pago 3 of 9 TITLE: gIC ROCX POINT RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRAM SAMPLE COLLECTION AND SHIPMENT l
l 5.1.3 Weekly at each sample location, perform the followings
- a. Open protective cover on air sampler and record the vacuum reading
'and the integrated gas seter readings onto the sample collection sheets under "Removed" column.
NOTE: It is unnecessary to turn air sample unit off when changing out filter holders.
NOTE: If airflev meter must be replaced, record the noter removed data in columns provided. Under the "Remarts" column, record the seter number, date and meter reading for the new replacement airflow seter.
- b. Disconnect the air filter holder and observe if vacuum gauge i reading exceeds 20 inches of mercury. If vacuum does not exceed 20 inches, then inspect unit for air leakage and perform appropriate maintenance.
- c. Remove filter holder to enclosed vehicle.
- d. Remove and replace filters while inside vehicle.
NOTE: Center the filter properly to prevent leakage.
- e. Place particulate filter in glassine envelope or plastic and !
identify as per Attachment 3. .
- f. Identify carbon filter as per Attachment 3. !
3 Reattach the filter holder. Filters and filter holder sust be positioned so that the airstream first passes through the l particulate filter and then through the charcoal cartridge. l
- I
- h. Place hand over filter inlet to form a seal. Record maximum stable l vacuna reading obtained when (by visual observation) the airflow l meter is recording zero flow rate. Record vacuus reading under 1 test condition. If vacuum is less than 20 inches of mercury and '
1 the gas meter is indicating observable flow, leakage is occurring.
Leakage must be repaired or the airflow meter / pump replaced. If
, the vacuum reading obtained is greater than 20 inches of mercury,
- then air leakage is considered nil.
NOTE: If repair or replacement of air seter is required, repeat 5.1.3.h and record new test vacuum under "Remarks" column.
- i. Remove hand and record operating vacuum on data sheet. Normal i vacuum obtained will range between 1 and 15 inches of mercury. If less than 1 inch of mercury is obtained, significant filter bypass leakage may be occurring. Reposition the filters until a vacuun of
! hp1285-0111a*91-154 1
l
- . PALISADES NUCLEAR PLANT Proc N3 HP 10.9 !
HEALTH PHYSICS PROCEDURE Revision 0 l Page 4 ef 9 l
TITLE: SIC ROCK POINT RADIOLOGICAL ENVIROWNENTAL !
PROGRAM SAr?LE COLLECT DN AND SHIPMENT l
l l
about 1 inch of mercury is obtained. If the vacuum reading cannot '
be maintained between 1 and 15 inches of mercury, replace the l airflow meter with a spare unit. '
NOTE: (1) Under high moisture or dust conditions, a vacuum reading greater than 15 inches of mercury may be considered normal. These climatic conditions should be noted in the "Remarks" column on the sample sheet. '
(2) If vacuum indicator is resting on the "peg," record 0 vacuum. If vacuum indicator is not resting on the "peg" but is less than the first graduation on the vacuum gauge, record 1 in the vacuum column. !
- j. Close cover and proceed to the next station.
- k. Record pertinent information, date and sign data sheet.
L. Transcribe gas meter reading and operating vacuum to the "installed readings" columns on the sample data sheet to be used for the upcoming week's sample collection.
1 5.2 REMP WELL (DRINKINC) WATER SAMPLE COLLECTION - CHARLEVOIX, MICHICAN l 5.2.1 Prerequisites l
- a. Clean one gallon polyethylene containers (labeled as per Attach-ment 3)
- b. REMP Miscellaneous Data Sheet 5.2.2 Daily perform the following sample collections
- a. Turn on water supply and allow water to run for approximately one minute to purge the line,
- b. Draw off approximately 125 mL of cap water and add to polyethylene container.
- c. Repeat Steps 5.2.2.a and 5.2.2.b daily for entire month. Note any day's sample not taken in "Remarks" column of sample data sheet.
- d. At end of month, seal containers.
- e. Record on the Data Sheet the location, type, date, time, quantity and, under "Remarks," indicate any pertinent information (ie, composite sample, start and finish dates, etc). Sign form in space provided. ,
l l
hp1285-Ottla-91-154 I
i
i
= .
PALISADES NUCLEAR PLANT Proc N3 HP 10.9
- HEALTH PHYSICS PROCEDURE Revision 0 Page 5 of 9 TITLE BIC ROCK POINT RADIOLOCICAL ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRAM SAMPLE COLLECTION AND SHIPMENT 5.3 REMP MILX SAMPLE COLLECTION 5.3.1 Precautions Milk samples are required to be sent to the laboratory as soon as possible because of the short decay time of I-131. Any undue delay may cause analytical sensitivity requirements of the Technical Specifications to be exceeded.
5.3.2 Prerequisites
- a. Two clean polyethylene one gallon containers for each sample location
- b. Eight premeasured packets of sodium bisulfite preservative (one packet per gallon of milk)
- c. REMP miscellaneous data sheet 5.3.3 Monthly, at each sample location, perform the followinst
- a. Obtain two one gallon grab samples of raw milk and pay milk supplier.
NOTE: Two clean, empty polyethylene one gallon containers may be left with milk supplier for the next month's samples when picking up the current month's samples. If problems are encountered in obtaining a sufficient quantity of milk sample, notify either the BRP or RSD Radiological Environmental contact.
- b. Label containers as per Attachment 3.
- c. Package and ship samples as per Attachment 4
- d. Record on Data Sheet, location, type, date, time, quantity, and under "Ramarks," any pertinent information. Sign form in space i provided.
5.4 REMP AQUATIC BIOTA COLLECTION NOTE: Collection to be coordinated between the Radiological Services Department RMC Section and the Environmental Services Department.
5.4.1 Precautions
- a. At least one individual in the collection party is required to have a State of Michigan Collector's Permit for fish sample collection.
hp1285-0111a-91-154 J
l
PAL 25 ADES NUCLEAR PLANT Proc Wo HP 1009 HEALTH PHYSICS PROCEDURE Revision 0 Page 6 ef 9 TITLEt BIC ROCK POINT RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRAM SAMPLE COLLECTION AND SHIPMENT 5.4.2 Prerequisites
- a. Small frog spears (plus replacement spearheads)
- b. Plexiglas bottom buckets (or boxes)
- c. Wire or stiff nylon brushes
- d. Black "magic" markers for writing sample identification on containers
- e. Gill not
- f. Plastic one-liter vide-mouth bottles and tape 3 REMP Miscellaneous Data Sheets
- h. 10% formaldehyde solution
- i. Fillet knives
- j. Scrapers (putty knives) 5.4.3 Semiannually, samples shall be collected as follows:
- a. Periphyton is collected by' scraping from rocks into a pail. When sufficient sample is collected, excess water is gently poured off.
The partially solidified periphyton is then transferred to a liter sample bottle.
- b. Attached filamentous algae is collected by hand f rom underwater debris, rocks, obstacles, etc. and compacted into a liter bottle.
c.
One liter of crayfish is collected by spearing and hand picking. l
- d. Bottom feeding forage fish and predator-type (game) fish are collected by gill netting. One liter of flesh is to be collected free each type of predominant fish s;acies caught. i
- f. Record on Data Sheet, location, type, date, time, quantity, and.
under "Remarks," any pertinent information. Sign form in space provided.
5.5 REMP SEDIMENT SAMPLE COLLECTION 5.5.1 Prerequisites
- a. One-liter wide-mouth plastic sample bottles hp1285-Ollla-91-154
PALISADES WUCLEAR JLANT Proc Wo WP 10.9 HEALTH PHYSICS PROCEDURE Revision 0 Page 7 of 9 TITLE: /IC ROCK POINT RADIOLOGICAL EWIkOKHENTAL PROGRAM SAMPLE COLLECTION AND SHIPMENT
- b. Dredge or hand scoop
- c. Miscellaneous Data Sheet 5.5.2 Samiannually, at each sample location, Radiological Services / Environ-mental Services personnel shall collect sediment samples.
- a. Record on data sheet, location, type, date, quantity, and, under "Remarks," indicate surface area of sample and depth at which sample was obtained. Sign form in space provided.
5.6 REMP TLD SAMPLE COLLECTION 5.6.1 Precautions '
- a. Under no condition shall TLDs be routinely taken into the plant.
Site TLDs for Big Rock Point shall be placed in the lead cave located in the guard shack and the BRP Radiological Environmental contact notified immediately.
- b. Three sets of TLDs are present at each location. The packets are labeled MONTHLY, QUARTERLY and ANNUALLY to ensure proper ;
rcplacement.
l 5.6.2 Prerequisites 1 i
- a. TLDs
- b. Environmental TLD Report Sheet 5.6.3 Monthly, quarterly and annually at each sample location, perform the following NOTEt Monthly TLDs are to be changed each month quarterly TLDs during January, April, July and October and annual TLDs during January.
- a. Upon receipt of TLLs from the laboratory contractor, all TLDs shall ,
be inventoried and immediately placed in the lead cave (at offsite i sample collector's residtace). Note date of receipt on data sheet.
t
- b. Field TLDs shall only be removed from the lead cave for delivery to their proper locations. All control TLDs remain in the lead cave !
throughout the entire exposure period. l
- c. Remove and replace TLDs at each sample lucation.
I
- d. For any missing TLDs, perform the followingt i l
(1) Search immediate area.
l hp1285-0111a-91-154
PALISADES WUCLEAR PLANT Proc N3 HP 10.9 i HEALTH PHYSICS PROCEDURE Revision 0 Page 8 of 9 TITLE BIC ROCK POINT RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL PROCRAM SAMPLE COLLECTION AND SHIPMENT (2) If lost TLD is found, collect it and perform standard change- ;
out procedure.
(3) If lost TLD is not found, post the new TLD in proper location. l (4) Record in "Remarks" column of Data Sheet, any of the above circumstances.
until ready for mailing to Laboratory contractor. Mark "Do not x-ray" on TLD package.
NOTEt Transportation control TLDs are to be stored in the special lead shield provided by laboratory contractor only after field TLDs are posted.
Make sure that the properly matching control TLDs are returned with its designated batch field TLDs. Also, ensure that laboratory contractor's own TLD Data Sheet is completed and enclosed with shipment.
- f. Record on Data Sheet, location, type, date, time and, under "Remarks," any pertinent information. Sign form in space provided.
5.7 Be sure that all collected samples are identified and labeled as per Attachment 3.
5.8 Complete the appropeizte Sample Collection Data Sheet and distribute ni follows: /
White - Analytical Laboratory Yellow - BRP Radiological Environmental Contact ;
Pink - Radiological Services llepartment Environmental Contact (Palisades)
Cold - Sample Collector i
5.9 Obtain best available replacement fur any missing sample. Notify BRP or RSD Radiological Environmental contact with description and location j of the replacement sample. '
5.10 Explain missing samples or malfunctioning equipment in writing to BRP or RSD Radiological Environmental contacr..
l 5.11 Package and ship samples according to Accachment 4 5.12 Ensure that sampling stacions are maintained and calibrated as I required. l hp1285-0111a-91-154
- PALISADES NUCLEAR PLANT Proc No HP 10.9 HEALTH PHYSICS PROCEDURE Revision 0 Page 9 vl 9 TITLE BIC ROCK POINT RADI'OLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRAM SAMPLE COLLECTION AND SHIPMENT 6.0 ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA Proper completion of procedure 7.0 RECORDS AND ATTACHMENTS 1 7.1 RECORDS 7.1.1 Distribution of Sample Data Collection Sheets as specified in Sec-tion 5.8 7.1.2 Sample Data Collection Sheets shall be retained in the Uniform File Index under DCC number BRP 740/24*03*10/LP 7.2 ATTACHMENTS Attachment 1, "Big Rock Point Environmental Sample Collection Schedule" Attachment 2, "Big Rock Point Sampling Locations" Attachment 3, "Sample Identification" Attachment 4, "Sample Packaging and Shipping" Attachment 5, "Big Rock Point Sample Collection Forms" hp1285-0111a-91-154
)
l L
- ' Pecc No WP 10.9 )
At tcchment 1 1 R0visica 0 Page 1 of 2 ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLE COLLECTION SCHEDULE . _ _ _ . _ . _ _ _ . . _
Big Rock Point 1
Exposure Pathway Number of Samples Collection and/or Sample and Locations
- Sample Type Frequency i Airbornet i l
Particulates 1 - Onsite Continuous at Weekly 3 - Within 5 miles (8 km) approximately 1 I
of the site boundary 1 cfm (may be in different less due to sectors dust loading).
2 - Vicinity of com-munities having the highest calculated annual average ground level D/Q 1 - Control Iodines Same as particulates Same as Weekly particulates Waterbornet Lake Water 1 - Intake Daily composite Monthly 1 - Discharge To obtain a one-gallon sample Well Water 1 - Charlevoix Daily composite Monthly I
i Municipal System l
1 - Site One gallon grab Monthly sample l
Ingestion l Milk 3 - Within a 2-7 mile Two-gallon grab Monthly (3.2-11.2 km) radius sample 1 - Control within 10-20 miles (16-32 km)
- If Sa'.ples are unavailable at the specified location, an attempt should be made to sample at an alternate location (refer to 4.5).
hp1285-0111b-91-154
wroc Wo 89 10.9 Attachment 1 Revision 0 Page 2 of 2 Exposure Pathway Number of Samples Collection and/or Sample and Locations
- Sample Type _ _ _ Frequency-Fish Various game species One-liter fish Semiannually in vicinity of plant flesh Ludington control Aquatic Biota: _
(Crayfish, 1 - 31scharge One-liter grab Semiannually shore minnow, sample filamentous 1 - 1/4 mile north algae, peri-phyton) 1 - 1/4 mile south 1 - Nine mile pt 1 - Mt McSauba 1 - Ludington control Direct TLD 4 - Onsite Continuous Monthly, quarterly and 6 - Site boundary annually 3 - Within a 3- to 5-mile (4.8-8 km) radius 3 - 10 to 50 miles (16-80 km) distant .
1 3ediment 1 - 1 to 3 miles One liter gr 's Semiannually east (1.6-4.8 km) sample of site 1 - Discharge i 1 - Ludington (control)
(2 samples recommended) l
- If samples are unavailable at the specified location, an attempt should be made to sample at an alternate location (refer to 4.5).
hp1285-0111b-91-154
- * ~ Proc Wo HP 10.9 !
Attachment 2 !
Revision 0 l Page 1 of 5 l l
l SAMPLING LOCATIONS !
Big Rock Point Plant Sample a D' D L3 i
e 4 !
- 2* !
- l 4 u8 ut 1 ; d t a 2 ;
4 40 43 .1 s 1 2 # i: !
Station Code Location ! l 1 ST Big Rock Point Nuclear X X X X X X X X Plant '
2 NM Nine Mile Point, 3 Miles X X X X X X (4.8 km) E <
3 CH Charlevoix, Michigan X X X X l
4-1/2 Miles (7.2 km) SW l 1
4 SL Susan Lake, 3.5 Miles X X I X !
(5.6 km) SE '
5 PT Petoskey, Michigan X X X 10-1/2 Miles (16.8 km) E 6 BC Boyne City, Michigan X X X 12 Miles (19,2 km) SE I 7 TR Traverse City, Michigan X X X 50 Miles (80 km) SSW l
i 8 D Control (Lead Cave) X ;
D Wilks, Charlevoix, l Michigan :
l 9 A Meteorological Tower X i i
10 B West Site Boundary on X Lake Michigan 11 C South Site Boundary, X Shanaban's Orchard 0.8 Miles (1.3 km) SW 12 E Southeast Boundary X 0.9 Miles (1.4 km) SSE, US-31 Near Railway Spur hp1285-0111c-91-154
. - _ . - - . . . . , .~. - . _ _ _ ._ _, . . _ , - .
\ . .
Proc No HP 10.9' Attachment 2 Revision 0 Page 2 of 5 Sample u u l o i 3
l
. $ 5
.!" '44 1 .
. a
.e d *
$ <w .t
.t .% 1 .:w T, .O .3
<- 3 2 x e d Station Code Location 13 F First CP Co Pole in Right X
___of Way South of US-31 14 C Information Center Site X 15 H Vent Shed (South Side) Site X 16 J Susan Creek Near Lake X Michigan 17 K Discharge Canal (Fisherman) X 18 L A cass Control X 19 MS Mt McSauba, PE, 3 Miles X (4.8 km) W ;
20 JC J Colovich - I Maple Grove Road Xl Charlevoix, Michigan 4.5 Miles (7.2 km) SE f
21 DK D L Kuebler, Upper Bay X Shore Road, Charlevoix l i !
Michigan 2.5 Miles (4 km) E 22 RM R McCraney, Horton Bay Road l X i Charlevoix, Michigan 6.5 Miles (10.4 km) SE 23 BB B Bochniak, Resort Pike X t
Road, Petoskey, Michigan 11.5 Miles (18.4 km) E '
24 STS 1/4 Mile (0.4 km) South X X Boundary ,
25 STN 1/4 Mile (0.4 km) North X X Boundary 26- LP Ludington Pumped Storage X
_ X X hp1285-Ollic-91-154
l i
- o. u .. . . u. . .a .. . .
1 LAKE MICHIGAN N els .ci ,,
f '5 G
6Q T
Y _t TsTo ew a rToe 4.c.ci.. e st.cs h I seest.nlee 8 O,..- _
%,u l \
i 1 , ~
"s+
e
.I /
! ,/ LEGEND e
g4 IIG ROCK PolNT e SITE HAP j wi fe tavlegante f at moelf00 leg S1 18081
/e c k:. _ .. _
hp1285-0111c-91-154
l Proc No HP 10.9 Attachmont 3 Revision 0 Page 4 of 5
'- ~ -
'l i ; vm L iM-H u xv- f1 J ' MA i :- ==
I,!
! '4 i
i ' iP '8-
S .. ,.V,. , .
i
, v. '
'l i
!. V. igip[l i
~ i. . a l l .
'. ; . : .' . it. ., ' _O
-l @ ! ?(L a .. ,
i !, 1.
If I ,=.' S N' _
A l
i < j.y . ., . A #f i i e i
, i g
'Ts.
y,';;'
., .!. . 4 16 n6 I Ire '~.*
/ .. .: . ., w , , . . . . m%
ias7 Al!
g . * . , .' , .,. , . .. -
l 1 j as b ./
- i. . . .
. , , g '.....<
i
- .' . g' k hj
, pl.f,y.uL_ i4 1
,1 ,
.'f.:1,..Q.
1
.x
. t i i g .(j !!y-
- - . . r. . .
..as. . . , -,
- i. . . .. . 1. - -
- m;i( et I
%. .d. , :' . tj. S jf.:'["p; @ .,d s _{
,- s.
- i. .
- p. . .'.. '.
3..., j S[ u i
}... . )-
. y~ , mw ; w..g .
i,
%m ~fSL',W%
i.'.I,.. .
l t f a l.i
.i . . . t. . ' ...
.. .. . . ,. 1 . 4s. . wJ-s ~M y
p,c i' M.,,a m
.. S r-"' i :i
. 4. . t'. . ;$b L I.. ,.' .. !.%. . ..q0:. '
l, . .
.. .l te @ . . , . . .
@g-S
>.' ..,!.!! ' ' ..-. ... :J.; .;. 4,.y."+ : .
n.
- d.f4. l. '
.i . . ,. . .
. . s.
) .. . .x . . i.
. l. .
., , .? .
$v . #. . f .7 l..,, .
- . .* .l . .
c r.
.\...
. .r./.i
.;3..
. s . . i. . .%
,L,.
a
. K.
i s.
.#.. ,;3. , v,,,4. ,j.u,___
' ' e . .
e . )-i .
- i. . ' ;'.. ' . ' ' n .
- . } Q . ' . '
\.' . ' . ' ..: . ~:, . ' 2.;g.%, '
" l
- i. . N p;, _',
F . ' . ;jj,. q.'i,. . ,.). . ,:.jh.
.i.. . . .. . . . . .
.. .x. . l r,'
a . i.. . .-, '
-l.. v
... + . .'.
I.
. . I ;- ' ' . ... ). e 8R . " e- -:'"* *
. .'...I."'.M e...: a~.
.l. .
q
,l- . . * *
. . . 3 8
9
. . L ,( l
- l. , . , .
.T ; = .
. A',' t
- .sp
.S..
. . . _.I,.
hp1285-0111c-91-154
Proc No HP 10.9 Attachm3nt 2 Revision o j Page 5 of 5 p- .
S AMPLING STATIONS uwn: en l Ludington Pumped l
)/ Steroge Pro;ect p,,,
l W erte9 fig '
Loor l l
l i
^
N \\ 0 N
t g
^
h '
wiu s
- r
,e i
% fL l
- 3 c7)~ RESERyo;g i
~
l Qu -
b l i
h lt l i .
4 l t
i cons ~ 1 g,,, . . . . . . .
\
hp1285-0111c-91-154
8 4 A
R 3. 3/.#
N 1117 4 B NNW NNE
\ /
i /
- n. .. : \ ,' ,,,,.,
O 'n \ l NW / C
, / / NE x s. .
i w ,%*x , /
4
/
- s ' * #
N s\ ; / / .4,,.=
/
4 ,
y ,
/
P -
'x
D WNW ,
-%f 'N / ENE 3 1 1/.#
N, .
, /
f / 'N \ s s 4, [ -
N W
N N ' i.
l'%%
! N1 -. t&
v-- E
./ y& _ hd ,.._. .
l ,i
. v !
m} i . . _ . . . 3 E'
y-$ , n , , ,
....,.> s 9 /.[ i,.. 8 N'J.pk-J 3 V
~.
fi ~7Lx ik !
,.s. .v. . .
..,.. l
/1@ 3 , " q.t _,_ . - -
)g-d
-r f"; -
)
w i
M .-
s i /x.__19 Lx Nt'> e-4 ' '/
1-i gs IV /: s' WSW / -/
'~
a). s/g M g' .>.
i u - F
, I - ,
j./
,a,,a i
7
\ 'l f ___ ,f ........
',l 's
"\l *,
ESE s
3,41/.O '
N j g '
4 J .g'{ { g
\,23 3<. 0 43 ,.-
/
- / '/-F
)'i - '
, fARF #
.. < ( k; ,' 3
_I -'g *:= ;]'
.s a
> 1'
. Li, 4 ' a -
L u aizv ix \
G SW lh.J -"1
\ SE n p.;r y i K \ ......_=.-.... ..
SSW " "'*' ' ' ' ' H ~"
J SSE
$ - i l
h-5b:hnisk, Resort Pike ? cad, ?etoskey, MI, 11.5 c.i E of SEP site (e. ilk location)
- i Proc No HP 10.9 Attachm:nt 3 Revision 0 Page 1 of 2 SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION _ _
NOTE: Use waterproof pen. Do not place paper labelt insiie containers.
- 1. Collected samples shall be adequately identified.
1
- 2. The plant identification shall be written on each sample container as follows:
Big Rock Point BRP Palisades PAL
- 3. The sample media type can either be written out or abbreviated on j container using the below-listed sample identification codes '
- a. Routine Samples:
Air Particulates AP Air Iodine AI
\
Well Water WW )
Lake Water LW Hilk MX Drinking Water - Raw DW-RAW Drinking Later - Treated DW-TREATED
- b. Special Samples:
1 Vegetation VE l
Fish FI Sediment SD Periphyton PE Crayfish CF Algae AL Shore Minnow SM hp1285-Ollid-91-154
- Proc Wo ifP 10.9 Attachment 3 Revisicn 0 Pago 2 of 2 SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION _,
- 5. The sample location (where collected) and collection dates are then to be written out on sample containers.
NOTE: Sample locations shall agree with Attachment 2.
- 6. The sample container identification and data recorded on the sample collection sheet must agree.
l I
l l
l l
l I
hp1285-0111d-91-154
1 I Proc No HP 10.9 l Attachm3nt 4 Pego 1 of 1 l Revision 0 l SAMPLE PACKACING AND SHIPPING .._.
! 1. Samples shall be clearly labeled per Attachment ~3.
- 2. All liquid, biota, fish and sediment samples shall be sealed with tape to prevent leakage.
- 4. Sufficient packing sacerial (eg, crumpled newspaper) shall be used to avoid possible sample damage during shipment.
- 5. Air filters shall be packaged in glassine or plastic envelopes.
- 6. For TLD shipments, make sure that Laboratory contractor's own TLD data sheet is enclosed with package.
- 7. Milk samples shall be shipped as soon as possible. Be sure to add one packet (40 grams) of sodium bisulfite as a preservative to each sample.
- 8. Food products shall be shipped as soon as possible. No preservative is necesscry.
- 9. Fish and biota samples _shall be shipped with 10% formaldehyde (preservative) solution added. Only 10 milliliters per sample are required.
- 10. The white copy of the Collection Data Sheet shall accompany all samples shipped to the analytical laboratory.
- 11. Samples shall be sent to the following address:
Teledyne Isotopes Midwest Laboratory Att C Carlson 1509 Frontage Road Northbrook, IL 60062
- 12. All samples shall be sent to the Laboratory contractor with minimal delay after collection so as to avoid alteration of analytical sensitivity requirements.
hp1285-0111e-91-154
,-------,,n, - . - _ . - , _ _ _ - .,--..-r--,+--.--,-,--,m. . - - , - - , . , - - - - - - . - - - - , - . _ , . - , , - -
= . Pesc Wo HP 10.9 Acccchmelt 5 Page 1 of 'J' R vision 0 BIG ROCK POINT SAMPLE COLLECTION FORMS
., ,... ' . NOV ? t tent
. *. run o .s., .. .
'... ,I nwi.i .t r... r 6., n u s i-. u c.i s .i..
.t cou..s r.
Air Particieletv4 . Alt ! Wine
,. . , , , n...,, 1.s.cr.sw c . ...o um g d %ser Av.eelmt a, .2. . _ u.
U' g *I ! .{
. A. As l ,, [Y g w
. ;::'_y 18-2 a n.
ti 4 re.6an w v e., ro A=,w i t. . e o a .}. a3"
"= :
,=. ;:
- = a n.
0
- D , tt **
- i .;I e .
e 8 i#
. g' ,. e 6 i ,3 I
/ ... . . . , . ,
f, [ >d . Ii.* , j j e. t - *.
I -
l t ' i .. . <.~ : t. . .
1 i
'. ,,o.
. I .
- n !r a g t'.#.l
, s. -
l i
1
-t I
l
.umman -
l l l
G 4 7
hp1285-0111f-91-154 o
'~' 'O -- '--- -, , ,,. - -, , . , _ _ , - - - ap ,,,_,y _ _,
- . Pr:c No WP 10.9 Acccchment 5 Pag 3 3 cf 3 Revisita 0 SIC ROCX POINT SAMPLE COLLECTION FORMS o.
Cenesier PLANT
...... . .. w .. .... u.., - . i i..
. _y ,_ .- l - .......
~
I ,
I I I I I I I I i i I I I I i, I I -
j i l I I I i I i i 1 I
! i I 1 I i l 1 !
! ! l i
! i
.I l l l I I l
i 1 I I I I
! I l i I I l l i i i i i l I I I I I l i I l I i i l l I I I I I I I I I I I w . I I I I
.' .I i 1 I I l l l l l ._
l I : i I hp1285-0111f-91-154
.. e
_ _ _ , . . _ . . - __ _ - _ , _ ,