ML20151V624
| ML20151V624 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 04/14/1988 |
| From: | Baker E, Conway J Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20151V570 | List: |
| References | |
| REF-QA-99902008 99902008-88-01, 99902008-88-1, NUDOCS 8805030123 | |
| Download: ML20151V624 (12) | |
Text
.
P ORGANIZATION:
CRUCIBLE MATERIALS CORPORATION TRENT TUBE DIVISION EAST TROY. LitrONtik REPORT INSPECTION INSPECTION NO.: 99902008/88-01 DATES: 02/16-19/88 ON-SITE HOUR $! 23 CORRESPONDENCE ADDRESS: Mr. John Tverberg, Vice President Technology Crucible Materials Corporation Trent Tube Division 2188 Church Street East Troy, Wisconsin 53120 ORGANIZATIONAL CONTACT:
H. D. Kurtz, Chief Metallurgist i
TELEPHONE NUMBER:
(416) 642-7321 NUCLEAR INDUSTRY ACTIVITY: Tubing for heat exchangers and condensers.
/
ASSIGNED INSPECTOR:
k, M
/ 80 J. T. Conway, Pro Aam Development and Reactive
[IaTe
i g Inspection Sect @ (PDRIS)
OTHER INSPECTOR:
T. Tinkle (consultant)
APPROVEDBf:
.,NId Si U
fh (i, li, Baker, Acting ief. PDRIS, Vendor Inspection Branch E j
l
)
I
~
INSPECTION BASES AND SCOPE:
A.
BASES:
10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B and 10 CFR Part 21.
B.
SCOPE: The inspection was conducted to perform a programmatic evaluation of the implementation of Trent Tube's (TT) QA program as it relates to the fabrication of tubing for nuclear facilities.
\\
PLANT SITE APPLICABILITY:
"Sea-Cure" tubing - Beaver Valley 2(50-412)and Point Beach 1/2(50-266/301).
i l
8805030123 880421 PDR QA999 EMVTRENT 99902008 DCD
r ORGANIZATION: CRUCIBLE MATERIALS CORPORATION TRENT TUBE DIVISION EAST TROY, WISCONSIN REPORT INSPECTION NO.: 99902008/88-01 RESULTS:
PAGE 2 of 12 A.
VIOLATIONS:
Contrary to Section 21.31 of 10 CFR Part 21, a review of purchase orders y
(PO) to vendors revealed that while 10 CFR Part 21 was ir 90 sed upon TT.
TT did not impose 10 CFR Part 21 requirements on PCs l'i 3 (December 30, 1985) to Anderson Laboratories, 50005 (February 27,1986) to Conam, and 58684 (January 22,1987) to Instrumatics (January 22,1987),
(88-01-01)
B.
NONCONFORMANCES:
1.
Contrary to Criterion IV of Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 50 Subsection NCA 3866.3 of Section !!! of the ASME Code, and Section 5 of ANSI N45.2, the requirement for a vendor to have an approved QA program was not stated on P0s 54113 (December 30,1985) to Anderson Labora-tories, 50005 (February 27,1985) to Conam, 58684 (January 22,1987) to Instrumatics, 59715 (April 30,1987) to Page Wilson, and 57224 (September 2,1986) to Magnetic Analytical Corporation (MAC).
(88-01-02) 2.
Contrary to Subsection hCA-3867.4(a) of Section III of the ASME Code and Sections 8.9.5 and 19.5 of the Quality Systems Manual (QSM) TT did not include the chemical product analyses which had been performed by steel manufacturers and/or a laboratory on the following CMTRs for nuclear orders:
(88-01-03)
'Two to Joseph Oat Corporation (J0C) for heat Nos. 360090 and 360314 on mill order No. NS-85027-6.
'Three to JOC for heat Nos. 230183, 340467 and 340911 on mill order No. NS-80173-4
'Two to Wisconsin Electric Power Company (WEPC) for heat No. 94164 on mill order Nos. 4N5-10364-7 and 3N5-10365-7.
'One to Duquesne Light Company (DLC) for heat No.1G4894 on mill order No. N5-70005-5.
3.
Contrary to Section 7.3 of Procedure No. 0C5-134 and Section 9.6.1 of SNT-TC-1A, a review of qualification records for 13 nondestructive examination (NDE) personnel revealed that the records for all the examiners did not contain a statement indicating satisfactory completion of training in accordance with TT's written practice No. QCS-134 (88-01-04)
ORGANIZATION:
CRUCICLE MATERIALS CORPORATION TRENT TUBE DIVISION EAST TROY, WISCONSIN REPORT INSPECTION NO.: 99902008/83-01 RESULTS:
PAGE 3 of 12 4.
Contrary to Criterion II of Appendix 0 to 10 CFR Part 50, Section 11 of ANSI N45.2, and Sections 4.1 and 4.4 of the QSM, a review of training records and training schedules for 1986 and 1987 indicated that TT failed to indoctrinate and train personnel performing activities affecting quality in the requirements of the QSM.
(88-01-05) 5.
Contrary to Subsection NCA-3867.4(e) of Section III of the ASME Code and Section 8.9 of the QSM, TT failed to upgrade stock material used for safety-related tubing on two orders from DLC (P0 No. 28559 dated February 4,1985) and WEPC (PO No. C397325 dated November 11,1987).
(88-01-06) 6.
Contrary to Criterion XII of Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 50, Subsection NCA-3868, and Section 17.5.1 of the QSM, a review of calibration records indicated that calibration cards for three pressure gauges (S/Ns 8325-4, 8247-7, and 1286) had not been updated to reflect current calibration status.
(88-01-07) 7.
Contrary to Criterion II of Appendix C to 10 CFR Part 50 Section 2 of ANSI N4C.2, and Section 6 of the OSM, documented evidence was not available to show that a "Nuclear Review" form was generated for two nuclear orders from DLC (P0 No. 28559 dated February 4,1985) and WEPC (P0 No. C397325 dated November 11,1987).
(88-01-08)
C.
UNRESOLVED ITEMS:
None.
D.
STATUS OF PREVIOUS INSPECTION FINDINGS:
None. This was the first inspection of this facility.
E.
OTHER FINDINGS AND COMMENTS:
1.
Trent Tube (TT)
TT is one of six divisions of Crucible Materials Corporation which is an employee owned company with corporate headquarters located in Syracuse, New York. TT produces stainless steel and alloy pipe and tubing at three manufacturing plants. At East Troy, Wisconsin, the CWA (cold work snnealed) Plant produces tubing (1/2" to 1 1/2" diameter) to 150 feet in length, and piping (1/8" to 4" diameter) to
r
)
l ORGANIZATION:
CRUCIBLE MATERIALS CORPORATION TRENT TUBE DIVISION EAST TROY, WISCONSIN REPORT INSPECTION NO.: 99902008/B8-01 RESULTS:
PAGE 4 of 12 50 feet in length is produced at the Trentweld Plant. The TT East Troy facilities havr an ASME 20,1589) Quality System Certificate (QCS-289 expiration date May for a Material Manufacturer of ferrous and nonferrous seamless and welded without filler metal tubular products. The plant in Carrollton, Georgia has a QSC (Materials) and certifications for NPT and U stamps, and it produces welded pipe and tubing from 2 7/8" - 72" outside diameters (OD).
2.
E-Brite 26-1 E-Brite 26-1 is a high purity ferritic stainless steel alloy developed and fabricated by Airco Vacuum Metals (AYM) until 1977 when the patent rights were purchased by Allegheny Ludlum (AL). The inspector was interested in knowing if TT had purchased E-Brite 26-1 from either AVM or AL and subsequently fabricated the alloy into a product that was used in a nuclear power plant.
In discussions with the Vict-President Technology, Chief Metallurgist, and Director of Marketing on this subject, the following information was obtained. TT has not fabricated any E-Brite orders since AL has been producing the Registered Trademark alloy. However, from 1974 through 1978. TT did a number of conversion crders (approximately 25) for AYM. To the best of their recollections, TT management indicated that the orders, all for tubing, did not contain quality or nuclear requirements, and the tubing was shipped to suppliers or to AVM.
They stated that TT did not supply any E-Brite tubing to any US comercial nuclear facility. TT was able to retrieve QA records pertaining to only two E-Brite orders. The records for both orders in 1977 were procurement document change orders and Returned Material Reports for tubing returned to TT due to suspected weld defects. TT performed ultrasonic tests (UT) on the tubing, which was identified only as ASTM A268 Grade XM-27, and shipped the tested tubes which passed UT back to AVM and Southwest Alloys in Houston, Texas.
3.
Plant Tour The inspector toured the CWA manufacturing facility in the presence nf the Manager, Technical Services.
Due to the nature of this inspec-tion and the time available, activities at the Trentweld Plant were not reviewed during this inspection.
Approximately 60 percent of the raw material from vendors is slit to size at TT's processing plant in Chicago, Illinois and sent to TT's CWA Plant in East Truy, Wisconsin. The strip is roll fonned into a
r ORGANIZATION:
CRUCIBLE MATERIALS CORPORATION TRENT TUBE DIVISION EAST TROY. WISCONSIN REPORT INSPECTION NO.: 99902008/88-01 RESULTS:
PAGE 5 of 12 circular shape and welded using the Tungsten Inert Gas (TIG) Process with argon-helium or hydrogen shielding on 10 weld mills.
The weld bead is cold worked to produce a smooth surface on the 00 and 10.
The tubing goes through in-line induction annealing followed by final straiahtening and sizing on rolls.
In-line eddy current testing (ET)anddestructivetests(mechanicalandhardness)are performed four times a shift assure the integrity of the weld. An off-line two-zone annealing furnace with an oxidizing atmosphere is also available.
Stretch or rotary strai tube lengths. A pneumatic (250 psi air)ghtening assures straight test is perfonned on all straight tubes.
The tubes are cut to length and samples are taken for the laboratory tests.
The laboratory performs tensile, hardness, flange, flatten, and reverse bend tests and also corrosion tests if required by the specification or the customer.
Finishing includes deburring and pickling (nitric /hydroflouric bath) followed by a dual rinse (treated plus demineralized water). A calibrated ring gauge is used on the tube, the OD and wall thickness are checked with a calibrated micro-meter, and a visual inspection of the weld's inside diameter (10) and OD is undertaken at final inr.pection. All the tubas are ET, and ultrasonic testing (UT) can be done if required by the customer.
MAC and Conam calibrate the ET and UT equipment, respectively.
The tubes are U-bent using a rotary die method with no lubricant fol?cwed by stress relieving using an electric resistance heated unit which is calibrated by Instrumatics. The bent or straight tubing is hydro tested at 1000 psi using demineralized water followed by purging with Argon. The radius of the bent tubes are checked on a template table, final cut to length, and deburred. A felt plug is blown through the ID of all tubes. Each tube is marked (type, heat number, row number for installation in vessel, and mill order number) and packaged for shipment.
4.
Documentation Packages (DP)
Four DPs for nuclear orders were reviewed in detail. Two J0C orders (P0 17265 dated September 19, 1984 and Revision 6 dated February 18 1986) were for approximately 2400 U-bend, SA 249, 304L tubes. The P0s invoked Section III, Class 1 of the ASME Code bt t did not reference 10 CFR Part 21 requirements.
Each DP consisted of a number of documents. TT assigned mill order Nos. NS-80173-4 (October 26,1984) and NS-85027-6 (June 19,1986) to these orders. Each mill order (i.e., traveler) identifieo manu-facturing operations and witness / hold points for the work. Nuclear Review Sheets identified procedure numbers for the manufacturing
r -
ORGANIZATION:
CRUCIBLE MATERIALS CORPORATION TRENT TUBE DIVISION EAST TROY, WISCONSIN REPORT INSPECTION NO.: 99902008/88-01 RESULTS:
PAGE 6 of 12 operations.
Procedures relating to stress relieving, VT, ET, tube cleaning, and hydrostatic testing were sent to J0C for their approval prior to use by TT.
For these orders, TT purchased Type 304L stainless steel from Armco Specialty Steels on P0s 47941 (September 20, 1984) and 1257 (February 26,1986). Armco CMTRs certifico the chemical analysis and mechanical properties for heat Nos. 230183, 340911, and 340467 (P0 17265) and beat Nos. 360090 and 360314 (P0 17265 Revision 6).
Anderson Labora aries performed spectrographic netallurgical analyses on samples free the five heats on TT P0s 54113 (December 30, 1985) and 43358 (no date since TT could not locate a copy). TT failed to impose quality or 10 CFR Part 21 requirements upon Anderson Laboratories (see Violation 88-01-01 and Nonconformance 88-01-02).
Two TT Laboratory Reports gave the chemical analysis (same as Armco CMTRs) and mechanical properties (yield and tensile strength, elonga-tion, and hardness) for the five heats. The flatten, flare, and reverse cena tests were also satisfactory.
Five TT CMTRs, one for each heat, documented the chemical analysis and rechanical test results.
Each CMTR stated that the tubing conformed to the require-ments of SA 249 and Section III, Class 1 of the ASME Code; gave the results from the pneumatic, hydrostatic, ET, and UT tests; and indicated that the results of the flange, flatten, and reverse bend tests were satisfactory.
It was noted that the five TT CMTRs failed to document the product chemical analysis Laboratories (see Nonconformance 88-01-03) performed by Anderson Othe documents in these packages included CWA row sheets, raw matertal release / disbursement Weld Procuction Reports, Pressure Test Reports (both pneumatic and hydrostatic), Inspection Tally Sheets (ITS), Solution Annealing Reports, ET charts, calibration check-off sheets, V-bend-process inspection sheets, and Shipping Notices. The CWA row sheet identifies various parameters (e.g.,
bend radius, tangent length, etc.) for each row of tubing, and the ITS docurents the results of visual, dimensional and ET test results.
Two DPs for ' Sea-Cure" tubing for DLC and WEPC for use in safety-related component coolin DLC's PO 28559 (February 4, 1985)g heat exchangers were reviewed.
was for 2400 3/4" tubes, and 5080 5/8" tubes were ordered by WEPC on P0 C397325 (November 11, 1987) for units at Beaver Valley and Point Beach nuclear plants, respactively.
Both P0s invoked the requirenents of 10 CFR Part 21 and Appendix B
r ORGANIZATION: CRUC1BLE MATERIALS CORPORATION TRENT TUBE DIVISION EAST TROY, WISCONSIN REPORT INSPECTION NO.: 99902008/88-01 RESULTS:
PAGE 7 of 12 to 10 CFR Part 50.
TT purchased strip mate.ial from Universal Cyclops (VC) for the DLC order and from Jones & Laughlin Specialty Products (JLSP) for the WEPC order.
1G4894) and JLSP (heat No. 94164) gave chemicals and mechanical values but did not certify that the material was produced in accordance with a QA program that met the requirements of Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 50 or ANSI N45.2 (i.e., this indicates that "stock material" was sent to TT).
TT performed mechanical testing and documented the results in labora-tory reports dated January 28, 1985 and November 12, 1987.
These results along with the results of the flange and reverse flat tests were identified in TT CMTRs to the custoners. Chemical analysis was not performed by an independent laboratory. TT did not report the product chemical analysis which had been performed by UC and JLSP (seeNonconformance 88-01-03). The results of the pneumatic and ET were reported on the CMTRs but there was no evidence that hydro-testing b d been performed, and the CMTRs did not certify that the tubes we,e manufactured to a QA program meeting the requirements of Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 50 or ANSI N45.2. Based upon a review of all the documents made available to the inspector for these two orders, it appears that TT failed to upgrade stock material for these nuclear orders (see Nonconformance 88-01-06).
In addition, a Nuclear Review Sheet was not in the DP for the DLC order. This matter was brought to the attention of the Manager Technical Services, CWA Plant, who reviewed the situation with the Chief Metallurgist and concluded that the order had been processed as a standard (non-nuclear) order rather than a non-standard (nuclear) order. He further stated that a standard order was probably used because the P0 did not invoke the requirements of Section III of the ASME Code.
(see Nonconformance 88-01-08)
The remaining documents (e.g., Weld Product Repert, Inspection Tally Report, etc.) were similar to those in the DPs for the J0C orders.
DL P0 26314 (September 20,1984) was for tubing for a refrigerant condenser at Beaver Valley Unit No. 1.
The PO invoked 10 CFR Part 21, Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 50, and DL specification hDS-0082.
The DP on this order was not reviewed by the inspector.
5.
Calibration of Measuring and Test Equipment (M&TE)
The inspector reviewed Section 17. "Calibration" of the QSM records to assure that H&TE is properly controlled and calibrated.
It was
r ORGANfZATION:
CRUCIBLE MATERIALS CORPORATION TRENT Tl'BE DIVISION EAST TROY, WISCONSIh REPJRT INSPECTION N0.: 99902008/88 01 RESULTS:
PAGE 8 of 12 noted that the QA Coordinator is responsible for preparing and main-taining a calibration card for each device. The card identifies the calibrator (personnel or subcontractor), the calibration procedure, and the results of the calibration.
The calibration card file was reviewed to ascertain the calibration status for selected test equipment.
The equipment included thr(e pressure gauges, two UT transducers, two UT testers MK!!, three micrometers, one ring gauge, one digital panel, one Tinius Olsen tester, one ET unit, one optical pyrometer, and two sets of gauge blocks.
For the three micrometers, it was noted that the earliest calibration date on the current card was June 1986, but the equipment was used in November 1984 (S/N 248-A) and May 1986 (S/Ns 154-A and 709-A).
The calibration cards for the three pressure gauges (S/Ns 8325-4, 8247-7, and 1286) had not been updated following the last calibration.
(See Noncon-formance 88-01-07) 6.
Control of Purchased Material and Services The inspector reviewed St.ction 8. "Purchasing" and Section 9 "Vendor Qualification" of the QSM, procurement documents, Approved Supplier List (ASL), and external audits to assure that items and services conform to the procurement documents and are purchased from approved vendors.
Procurement documents to five vendors of services were selected to determine if technical and quality requirements were included in P0s.
PO 54113 (December 30,1985) to Anderson Laboratories covered spectro-graphic aetallurgical analysis of stiel alloys for calendar year 1986.
Page Wilson calibrated the Tinius Olsen 60,000 lb. tensile tester under PO 59715 (April 30,198?). Although the PO to Page Wilson did not invoke quality or 10 CFR Part 21 requireaents, the Chief Metallurgist stated that the cc,libration service was perforrred on-site under the supervision of TT and in accordance with TT proce-dures.
The pressure gauges were calibrated oftasite by Instrumatics under PO 58684 (January 22,1987), and Conam calibrated the Sonic instruments under PO 50005 (February 27,1985) also off-site. PO 57224 (September 2, 1986) to MAC was for calibration of equipment.
It was noted that QA program requirements were not included in P0s 54113, 50005, 58684, 59715, and 57224 In addition, P0s 54113, 50C05, and 58684 did not reference 10 CFR Part 21 requirements.
(see Violation 88-01-01 and Nonconformance 88-01-02)
TT receives raw material (i.e., strip, sheet, and plate) from a number of 'donestic vendors which include Allegheny Ludlum (AL),
JLSP, UC, Armco, Jessop Lukens, and International Nickel. A review I
f ORGANIZATION:
CRUCIBLE MATERIALS CORPORATION TRENT TUBE DIVISION EAST TROY, WISCONSIN REPORT INSPECTION NO.: 99902008/88-01 RESULTS:
PAGE 9 of 12 of iT P0s(e.g., 36285 dated September 24, 1982 to UC; 1207 dated February 4, 1986 to LSP; 1257 dated February 26, 1986 and 47941 dated September 20, 1984 both to Armco) indicated that TT purchased stock material which would have to be upgraded to meet the require-ments of a nuclear order.
Three QA audit reports of AL, Anderson Laboratories and Armco were reviewed. Two of the auditt were conducted by the Manager QC -
Trentweld Plant, and the audit of AL was by an individual from the Carrollton Plant. A review of the qualification records for the auditors indicated that the most recent data for the Carrollton employee was August 1986. This matter was brcught to the attention of the QA Coordinator who had a copy of the individual's current record telecopied from the Carrollton Plant.
7.
Nondestructive Examination (NDE)
The inspector reviewed Section 14. "Nondestructive Testing" of the QSM, TT's written practice QCS-134, Revision 6. "General Require-ments for NDT Training and Certification," qualification records for 13 NDE personnel, and two NDE procedures. A memo from the President dated November 19, 1987 on the subject of Non-Destructive Training and Grading delegated the authority to administer the training of Level I and Level II NDE personnel to the Chief Inspectors of the Trentweld and CWA Plants. TT performs both ET and UT during fabrica-tion.
Procedures QCS-110, Revision 5 "Ultrasonic Inspection of Tubing and Pipe" and 0C5-109, Revision 13 "Eddy Current Testing" were reviewed.
For both procedures, there was no indication who wrote, reviewed, and/or approved the documents.
In general, the type of information found in the record files for the 13 NDE personnel (four - Level !!! and nine - Level II) included educational background, training record, record of qualification, certification statements, copies of examinations (general, specific, and practical), and eye exams. With one exception, the qualifica-tion records appear to satisfy the requirements SNT-TC-1A.
The exception is that the qualification records for each examiner did not contain a statement showing satisfactory completion of training in accordance with Procedure No. QCS-134 (see Nonconformance 88-01-04).
8.
Indoctrination and Training The inspector reviewed Section 4 "Training" of the QSM and training records for both the CWA and Trentweld Plants.
The CWA Training
ORGANIZATION: CRUCIBLE MATERIALS CORPORATION TRENT TUBE DIVISION EAST TROY, WISCONSIN REPORT INSPECTION N0.: 99902008/88-01 RESULTS:
PAGE 10.of 12 Schedule for 1986 was a matrix showing the subject, instructor, and the month in which the training was given.
The Training /Heeting sign up sheets for each sesstun were reviewed. The sessions were titled DuPont Specification, Muclear Training, Nuclear Orders, Auditor Training, Manager Teetnical Service Training, Welder Quality Training, Multicathode, Inspector Training, and Level I!! Training.
A nuclear training outline for "Welding and Furnishing" was reviewed.
This session was given in November 1986, and a session on "Funda-mentals of Ultrasonics" was given by the Chief Inspector in October 1986.
The CWA Training Schedule for 1987 indicated 10 areas were covered.
These sessions included Nuclear Training Welding, Level 111 Training, Practical Nuclear Order, Mill Inspection Training, Management Produc-tion & Inspection Training, Advanced Training for Final Inspector, Forester Training, New Product Lines, Training for Welders, and UT Training.
A review of the Trentweld Training Schedule for 1986 indicated that only three subjects out of 32 identified on the matrix were given.
The schedule for 1987 included nine subject areas. Training /Meoting sign up sheets for these sessions were reviewed.
There was no indication that a Training Schedule for 1986 for either plant had been prepared.
In addition, documentation was not made available to the inspector to show that training had been perfomed prior to 1987. Following the review of all the training records presented to the inspector, it was noted that personnel performing quality affecting activities had not been trained or indoctrinated with applicable requirements of the QSM (see Nonconfomance 88-01-C5).
9.
10 CFR Part 21 The inspector reviewed TT Procedure No. 0C5-147 which addresses the evaluation and reporting of deviations.
The procedure along with Section 206 of the Energy Reorganization Act of 1974 and 10 CFR Part 21 were posted on the employee's bulletin board in the CWA Plant. There was no documented evidence presented to the inspector that TT has a dedication program in effect to upgrade "commercial grade" material as defined in Section of 10 CFR Part 21 in the event that the material is used as a safety-related basic component in a nuclear facility.
r ORGANIZATION: CRUCIBLE MATERIALS CORPORATION TRENT TUBE DIVISION EAST TROY, WISCONSIN REPORT INSPECTION NO.: 99902008/88-01 RESULTS:
PAGE 11 of 12 10.
Ferritic Stainless Steel Two other ferritic stainless steel alloys have been fabricated by TT for heat exchanger applications in nuclear power plants. The two alloys are Type 439 which is a stabilized material (17-19% Cr) that has been used in condensers, feedwater heaters, lube oil coolers, and component cooling heat exchangers; and SEA-CURE, a Registered Trade-mark stabilized material (approximately 27.51 Cr) that has been used in condensers and other plant cooler tubing applications. Based on discussions with TT management personnel, the following list is a summary of the ferritic materials produced by TT for balance of plant installations. TT stated ti,at none of the orders were for Section 111 tubing.
Licensee Plant Application Date Shipped Wisconsin Public Kewaunee Service (WPS)
Northeast Utilities Conn. Yankee Condenser 08/81 - 11/85 Niagara Mohawk Nine Mile Point Condenser 02/84 DLC Beaver Valley Condenser 09/84 - 02/85 Corrponent Cooling Exchanger Refrigeration Condensing Unit WEPC Point Beach Component Cooling 11/87 Exchanger Lube & Seal Oil Coolers Southern California San Onofre Low Pressure Blow 11/87 Edison Down The order from WPS was for Type 439 stainless steel, and Sea-Cure was the alloy for the remsining orders.
F.
PERSONNEL C01TACTED:
B. Grant, President
- J. Tverberg, Vice President Technology
- H. Kurtz, Chief Metallu* gist
t ORGANIZATION: CRUCIBLE MATERIALS CORPORATION TRENT TUBE DIVISION EAST TROY, WISCONSIN REPORT INSPECTION NO.: 99902008/88-01 RESULTS:
PAGE 12 of 12
- D. Janikowski, Manager Technical Services - CWA
- R.
Billiat, Sales
- H. Hubbell, Production Manager Sales
- T. Matuszak, Production Manager Sales
- D. Burt, QA Coordinator
- J. DeClark, Manager QC - Trentweld
- J. Stam, Plant Manager - Trentweld
- D. Greeley, Plant Manager - CWA L. Lundwall, Chief Inspector - CWA J. Thackray, Director Marketing
- Attended exit meeting.
1
'f I
n 6
. _ _ _ _ _.,