ML20151U555
| ML20151U555 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Mcguire, Catawba, McGuire, 05000000 |
| Issue date: | 04/22/1988 |
| From: | DUKE POWER CO. |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20151U546 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8805020089 | |
| Download: ML20151U555 (4) | |
Text
.
~.
ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS
(
ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT
- 6.9.1.6 Routine Radiological Environmental Operating Reports covering the operation of the unit during the previous calendar year shcIl be submitted prior to May 1 of each year.
The initial report shall be submitted prior to May 1 of the year following initial criticality.
The Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Reports shall include summaries, interpretations, and an analysis of trends of the results of the radiological i
environmental surveillance activities for the report period, including a comoarison with preoperational studies, with coerational controls as aopecoM ate.
and with previous environmental surveillance reports, and an assessment of the observed impacts of the plant operation on the environment.
The reports shall i
also include the results of land use censuses required by Specification 3.12.2.
j um<nari'ael ord Wloked Ye.SulY5 omdy5ES The Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Reports shall (include -We-i 7: ult: Of = 1y:i:
allradiologicalenvironmentalsample(andpfall environmental radiation measurements taken during the period pursuant to the locations specified in the Table and Figures in the 00CM, :: w:1' :: :=-
O r i -
m...
...~,.
in the format m...
_...e-~
m.
...s.m m...,,m.,
of the table in the Radiological Assessment Branch Technical Position, Revision 1, November 1979.
In the event that some ir.disidual results are not available for inclusion with the rgert, the report shall be submitted noting and explaining the reasons for he missing results.
The missing data shall be submitted as
{
soon as possible in a supplementary report, in the Su,mmory3
.The reports shall a so include the following:
a samary description of the l
Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program; at least two legible maps **
covering all* sampling locations keyed to a table giving distances and directions from the centerline of one reactor; the resuits of licensee participation in the Interlaboratory Comparison Program, required by Specification 3.12.3; discussion of all deviations from the sampling schedule of Table 3.12-1; and discussion of all analyses in which the LLO required by Table 4.12-1 was not achievable.
SEMIANNUAL RADI0 ACTIVE EFFLUENT RELEASE REPORT ***
6.9.1.7 Routine Radioactive Effluent Release Reports covering the operation of the unit during the previou? 6 months of operation shall be submitted within 60 days after January 1 and July 1 of each year.
The period of the first reoort shall begin with the date of initial criticality.
"A single submittal may be made for a multiple unit station, asOne map shall cover stations near the site boundary; a second shall include the more distant stations.
- A single submittal may be made for a multiple unit station.
The submittal should combine those sections that are common to all units at the station; t
however, for units with separate Radwaste Systems, the submittal shall t
I specify the releases of radioactive material from each unit.
l wcutor - stTc 1 ou o 6-18 880D20089 880422 PDH ADOCK 05000369 P
o ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT (Continued) e
([i The Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Reports snall include
)
summaries, interpretations, and an analysis of trends of the results of the I
radiological environmental surveillance activities for the report period, l
l including a comparison with preoperational studies, with operational controls h
as appropriate, and with previous environmental surveillance reports, and an assessment of the observed impacts of the plant operation on the environment.
7 The reports shall also include the results of the land use census required by Specification 3.12.2.
l s w v44 %kkdmos analyses The Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Reports shall include 4he
.;; ult ;f n ly: ; f all radiological environmental sampi and pf all environmental radiation measurements taken during the period p'ursuant to the locations specified in the Table and Figures in the ODCM, ;; w;1' ;; :=:ri::d
- nd tabulated r;; ult; cf th;;;
- ncly;;; cad ;;;;ur;;;nt; in the format of the table in the Radiological Assessment Branch Technical Position, Revision 1, November 1979.
In the event that some-individu;l results are not available for inclusion with th; rg rt, the report shall be submitted noting and explaining th reasons for the missing results.
The missing data shall be submitted as soon as possible in a supplementary report.
'm Oc samrnorp The reports shall also include the following:
a summary description of the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program; at least two legible maps
- cover-I f
ing all sampling locations keyed to a table giving distances and directions from the centerline of one reactor; the results of licensee participation in the 1
Interlaboratory Comparison Progrem, required by Specification 3.12.3; discussion of all deviations from the sampling schedule of Taole 3.12-1; and discussion of
(
all analyses'in which the LLO required by Table 4.12-1 was not achievable, l
h SEMIANNUAL RADI0 ACTIVE EFFLUENT RELEASE REPORT **
6.9.1.7 Routine Radioactive Effluent Ralease Reports covering *he operation of the unit during the previous 6 months of operation shall be submitted within 60 days af ter January 1 and July 1 of each year.
The period of the first re-port shall begin with the date of initial criticality.
The Radioactive Efflu-4 ent Release Reports shall include a summary of the quantities of radioactive liquid and gaseous effluents and solid waste released from the unit as outlined in Regulatory Guide 1.21, "Measuring, Evaluating, and Reporting Radioactivity in Solid Wastes and Releases of Radioactive Materials in Liquid and Gaseous Effluents from Light-Water-Cooled Nuclear Power Plants," Revision 1, June 1974, with data summarized on a quarterly basis following the format of Appendix B thereof.
1
- 0ne map shall cover stations near the SITE B0UNDARY; a second shall include the more distant stations.
- A single submittal may be made for a multiple unit station.
The submittal should combine those sections that are common to all units at the station; however, for units with separate radwaste systems, the submittal shall specify the releases of radioactive material from each unit.
CATAWBA - JNITS 1 & 2 6-17 Amendment No.
(Unit 1)
Amendment No.
(Unit 2)
s Attachment II Discussion and No Significant Hazards Consideration Analysis
m Discussion and No Significant llazards Consideration Analysis The proposed change to the McGuire and Catawba Technical Specifications would delete the requirement to provide the results of all radiological environmental samples and of all environmental radiation measurements from section 6.9.1.6.
Instead, just the summarized and tabulated results will be required to be furnished annually. The individual results will be kept on file for NRC examination.
The requirement to provide the individual results of all analyses and measurements is an administrative burden which adds substantially to the size of the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report without adding any significant information which is not already included in either the text of the report or the summary of the results.
10 CFR 50.92 states that a proposed amendment involves no significant hazards considerations if operation in accordance with the proposed amendment would not:
(1) Involve a significant increcse in the probability or consequences of an accident previously evaluatad; or (2) Create the possibility of a new or different kind of accident from any accident previously evaluated; or (3) Involve a significant reduction in a margin of safety.
The proposed amendment does not involve an increase in the probability or consequences of any previously evaluated accident.
The probability or consequences of an accident are not increased because these changes are administrative in nature. The changes would affect the reporting requirements contained in Technical Specification section 6.9.1.6.
Therefore, the design and operation of the plants would not be affected by this change.
The proposed amendment would not create the possibility of a new or different kind of accident from any accident previously evaluated. Since, che proposed change is administrative in nature in that it would only affect a reporting requirement, no new mode of station operation is being introduced.
The proposed changes would not involve a significant reduction in a margin of safety. The changes are administrative, affecting only certain reporting requirements. As such the margin of safety is not affected by the proposed l
changes.
l l
The Commission has provided guidance concerning the application of the standards I
for determining whether a significant hazards consideration exists. This l
guidance includes examples (51 FR 7750) of types of amendments that are l
considered not likely to involve significant hazards considerations.
The changes l
proposed in this amendment are directly comparable to example (1): a purely l
administrative change to technical specifications...
i For the above reasons, Duke Power concludes that the requested amendments to the McGuire and Catawba Technical Specifications does not involve any significant I
hazards considerations.