ML20151N559
| ML20151N559 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Clinton  |
| Issue date: | 08/03/1988 |
| From: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20151N544 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8808090035 | |
| Download: ML20151N559 (2) | |
Text
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
~gg UNITED STATES
[
)
g NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
<r WASHINGTON, D. C. 20S55 4
,o
)
SAFETY EVALUATION BY THE OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION SUPPORTING AMENDMENT NO.
4 TO FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE N0. NPF-62 CLINTON POWER STATION, UNIT NO. 1 ILLIN0IS POWER COMPANY, ET AL.
DOCKET N0. 50-461
1.0 INTRODUCTION
By letter dated October 30, 1987, the Illinois Power Company, et al. (the licensees) proposed changing the Technical Specifications (TS) for the Clinton Power Station to correct action statements associated with the Reactor Water Level - low, low, level 2 channtis for Reactor Water Cleanup System isolation.
A notice of consideratior, of issuance of an amendment to the license and a proposed no significant hazards consideration determination and an oppcrtunity Qr hearing related to the requested action was published in the Federal -agister on January 27, 1988 (53 FR 2318).
No request for hearing and no public comments were received.
2.0 EVALUATION The licensees propose to change the action statements associated with th'e Containment and Reactor Vessel Isolation Control System (CRVICS), Technical Specification (TS) 3.3.2, Table 3.3.2-1, Item 3.e.
ACTION 21 for Item 3.e (Reactor Vessel Water Level - low low, Level 2 channels for Reactor Water Clear.up System isolation) was not changed in the previous submittal by the i
licensees dated January 1987 (Illinois Power letter U-600785) due to an l
oversight and resultant typographical error that occurred when changes l
were prcposed for the Clinton Full Power License Technical Specifications.
j Consequently, ACTION 21 does not apply since it is associated with an ACTION that has been deleted. The revisec designation is ACTION 25 for OPERATIONAL CONDITION "#" and ACTION 29 for OPERATIONAL CONDITIONS 1, 2 and 3.
The changes proposed by the licensees were previously approved by the NRC in Appendix Q of Supplement 8 of the Clinton Safety Evaluation Report.
l t
Based on the above, the staff finds the proposed change to Technical Specification 3.3.2, Table 3.3.2-1, Item 3.e acceptable.
8808090035 880803 PDR ADOCK 0500 1
\\
3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATION
This amendment involves a change to the administrative procedures.
Accordingly, this aiaendment meets the eligibility criteria for categorical exclusion set forth in 10 CFR 51.22(c)(10).
Pursuant to 10 CFR 51.22(b),
neither in environmental impact statement nor an environmental assessment need be prepared in connection with the issuance of this amendment.
4.0 CONCLUSION
Based on the considerations discussed above, the staff has concluded that:
(1) there is reasonable assurance that the health and safety of the public will not be endangered by operation in the proposed manr.ar, (2) such activities will be conducted in compliance with the Commission's regulations, and (3) the issuance of this amendment will not be inimical to the common defense and the security of the public.
Principal Contributor:
Roger Hendez, RIII Dated:
August 3, 1988
-