ML20151K840
| ML20151K840 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | River Bend  |
| Issue date: | 05/13/1985 |
| From: | Holahan G Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Butcher E NRC - TECH SPEC REVIEW GROUP |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20151K803 | List: |
| References | |
| FOIA-85-511 NUDOCS 8505230550 | |
| Download: ML20151K840 (2) | |
Text
... -
..: % = Sj.h, u # &,,..
s
./,,.s %,,'.
UmTED STATES
.[
,' ~
1 i.'UCLEM. REGULATORY COr.ir *lSSION.
f p
r.wsmrastora. o. c. 2csss 2
..,N
. /
I P
yf / )I >7
~ -
.-..."t* - - -.
g.ty...p g,,c gg;p, gpg.,,p ( g g 3;.
Tec'" i*1' i ici # a ti on E a ? f : * ""-'. ". I".
as " ". Fett.han, Chief i
C'e-ati"? ?e?ctcrs Assersment "r3rch, CL t
e....
- e.. m.......
- 3..
t e.em. ; e.n. e. w..g u;.
h..n... e
..v t
i l
.E
- re e, e. :..c
- f cens ='s '9e:nf and Ee"ie't Coc"" cf the Piver Eend i
i.0 mici 5 ecific:. icn! Section 3.E, as rela: Es to the e'r rgency ciesel I
e
- srert:crs (EC'sl, and Sec-ice E, %crinistrative Controls. 1e have the i
fc5 iag ca-- 2 :::
I 1
I Tha ED3s a-this plar.t.?are supplied by TDI and therefore the scecific 4
test lead vclues. etc. shoulc be reviewed by C. Berlincer's TDI Task f:
- ce.
's n.'2rstend. bctiever, that the ? resent clan is to dera:e the Inpi".e :c a revised cc.q inuous dut," retire 'i.e., ',he "c';t i#isd" losd l
ritir;) and te soeci#:* that' there is no overload CE9 ability.
I's
-alie"e thr be periedic test load runs she'.11d be at the re"iser.'
cor.:f r.ucus duty ra:irp even i' this value shnuld be creater than the calcule:ed accicent 1ced.
Sa., f 9 f 0
- cticn 5; cts
- ent 3.3.1.d shcuid be inccrocrated in the Acticr i
u p* 1 5:ete: ent dealing with one EDG being inoperable rather then beinc f
Ts seL1 rate Action Etate ent.
1; 2.
Th various start sig a's #39Ction 4.8.1.1.2.'!.", et al.) sh0V d *?e I
I scecified as to be used on a staggered basis, not allowing the same one to be used for every test.
g'p 4 The verification that the sum of the auto connected loads does not d p5 6.
exceed an allowable value (Section 4.8.1.1.2.f.9) must be chanced to agree with the revised continuous duty rating, since no everload i
cacability is apolicable.
f E.
He n te thzt the oro; osed Technical Specifications 'cr D.f wr *="i recuire more severe periodic testing than has recently been acorovec for North Anna Unit 2.
For North Anna, the severity of each periodic test is less, the number of periodic tests is less, and the runber of Action Statecent tests is less. A copy of the Ncrth Anna Tecnnical Specification is enclosed to provide the details of these charces.
We believe you should determine if URC management would agree to t
similar testing for Eiver Send at this time. With the ap?rcoriate c'1:erical ad.iusvents, there is nc techniccl reasnn not te use the North Anna Technical Scecifications. However, acministrative c.atters 'e.g.,
CD^
approval? nay need to be censiderec.
~
l CO." TACT :
M;3
'O cP3B S'o)(
8 rd "
h.5&
.~-
,a......n
. - 1.{..wf ",@53Edy..~
stde ~.J D, a..-
..s E6; d J. Sutcher ~
- ~.
"s nrte' thtt this apolicar.t has crorcsed to expar.d the tolerances on -
~
p/
p3p
- enerator frecuency from 60 + '.5 H
- to 60 + 3 Hz. We knce of no 9
-cascr. fer this excaasion an? believe that it shcaid be + 1.5 Hz, d o L l'
- 1eis folk.iustifiec by the aonlicant to the satisfaction cf
~ ~ c r E : t 7.: Fr:r.ch.
-e r.0:2 th?
the foc:ncte (c. 3/4 E-3, et al.) is different from 3 6
- he correscer.cing fortncte in Generic Letter 64-15 and. Technical b) frc:ificatices for otner clants (e.c. Perry). */e think the change i
is prcbably F.cceptable, but suggest that you discuss it with the Er:lic!-t tr rake sure ve understcnd what w!! intended.
g
,,p
~.
U-li' e scre c-her Te:hiicti Specifications we have seen, it is not cist-that the Oiver Send Facility Review Grouo will be required to 6dv D
etiew the Security Flan, Energency Plan, and Fire Protection Plan, 6.5. 2 ar.c acbropri?.te radiological release plans (and changes to these coca sr.ts) (Fection 6.5.1.6).
9.
Proe'sions.are rade for reporting pursuant to 10 CFR 50.73; however, yi2 aw Seci er 6.6.1 coes not provide for notifications oursuant to d
.:rce Jb5 Se:ti.cn 50.72 of 10 CFR 50. This ir. consistency should be resolved.
h.blN h h
s e s.<.,..,
g Rags-
./.,,
/. f.../
/..
i Gary M. Holchan, Chief Operating Peactors Assessrent. Branch, DL Enc 1 0surs:
As stated cc w/c enclosure:
i D. Crutchfield L. Rubenstein
" 'Srinivasan D. Houtter
- ^
l C. Beri c.e S. 5 ern l^
l l
I l
l
!L