ML20151H286
| ML20151H286 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Waterford  |
| Issue date: | 04/14/1988 |
| From: | Callan L NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | Dewease J LOUISIANA POWER & LIGHT CO. |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8804200333 | |
| Download: ML20151H286 (2) | |
Text
_ _,
{
e APR l 41933
'In Reply Refer To:
Docket:
50-382 Louisiana Power & Light Company ATTN:
J. G. Dewease, Senior Vice President Nuclear 0perations 317 Baronne Street New Orleans, Louisiana 70160 Gentlemen:
Attached is a copy of a report dated January 22, 1988, from the Federal Emergency Agency (FEMA) evaluation concerning the Waterford 3 Steam Electric Station October 14, 1987, exercise for the state of Louisiana; Ochsner Hospital; the Parishes of St. Charles, St. John the Baptist, St. James, and Jefferson; and the St. Charles Ambulance Service.
This exercise report was prepared by the FEMA Region VI office staff.
There were no deficiencies identified during this exercise; however, there was one area that required corrective action which was carried over from the previous exercise in October 1986, and several areas recommended for improvement. Based on the results of the exercise, the offsite radiological emergency plans and preparedness remain adequate to provide reasonable assurance that appropriate measures can be taken offsite to protect the health and safety of the public in the event of an accident at the Waterford 3 Steam Electric Station and the 44 CFR 350 approval granted on July 15, 1985, remains in effect.
If you have any further questions please contact this office.
Sincerely,
&tyul SM B)':
A. B. BEACH y L. J. Callan, Direktor Division of Reactor Projects
Enclosure:
as stated i
cc:
(see next page)
[
RIV:NMEPB?hf C:NMEPB C R /A 0:D P
AI 88-111 CAHackney;ap WLFisher DChamberlain LJCallan d /*/ /88 y /l( /88 4 //3 /88 q/Q/88 s
b
" b+
/
8804200333 880414 PDR ADOCK 05000382 F
J Louisiana Power & Light Company cc w/ enclosure:
Louisiana Power & Light Company ATTN:
G. E. Wuller, Onsite Licensing Coordinator P.O. Box B Killona, Louisiana 70066 Louisiana Power & Light Company i
ATTN:
N. S. Carns, Plant Manager P.O. Box B Killona, Louisiana 70066 Middle South Services ATTN: Mr. R. T. Lally P.O. Box 61000 New Orleans, Louisiana 70161 Louisiana Power & Light Company ATTN:
K. W. Cook, Nuclear Safety and Regulatory Affairs Manager 317 Baronne Street P.O. Box 60340 New Orleans, Louisiana 70160 Louisiana Radiation Control Program Director cc w/o enclosure:
Chief, Technological Hazards Branch FEMA Region 6 Federal Center 800 North Loog 288 Denton, Texas 76201-3698 bec w/ enclosure:
DMB (A045) s/
Resident Inspector Section Chief DRP/A Inspector RIV File bec w/o enclosure:
RDMartin l
RLBangart l
REHall WLFisher Project Inspector, DRP/A DRS ORP NMEPB MIS System GFSanborn DBMatthews, NRR
s l
4 l
l FINAL RADIOLOGICAL EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS EXERCISE REPORT Nuclear Power Plant: Waterford 3 Steam Electric Station Applicant Loulslana Power and Light Company Location of Plant: State of Loulslana St. Charles Parish Taf t, Loulslana re Date of Final Report: January 22,1988 Date of Exercise: October 14, 1987 L.
Participants:
State of Loulslana St. Charles Parish 7
St. John the Baptist Parish 1
Jefferson Parish St. James Parish Ochsner Hospital i
St. Charles Ambulance Service FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY Region VI Federal Center 800 N. Loop 288 Denton, Texas 76201 i
8%)*
0 6
g[l A
~
.s CONTENTS A B B R E VI A TI O N S..........................................................
Iv INTRODU CTION A N D A UTH O RITY..........................................
v 1 E X E R C ISE B A C K G R O U N D...............................................
1 1.1 E x e rc i s e S u m m a r y...................................................
2
- 1. 2 Fe d e ral E v al u a t o rs..................................................
2
- 1. 3 Ex e r c i s e O bj e c t i v e s.................................................
3 1.3.1 St a t e of Loulslana Objectives...................................
3 1.3.2 P ar i s h O bj e c t i v e s.............................................
4 1.4 Guidelines For Offsite Participation...................................
7 1.5 Ex e rcis e Sc e n ario Su m m ary...........................................
8
- 1. 6 Evalu a t i o n C ri t e ri a.................................................. 10 2 E X E R CIS E E VA L U A TI O N................................................
11 IT
'2 ' " ' ' ' " " * * - a"-
22
,i 2.1.1 St a t e EO C (LOE P/LN E D)....................................... 11 l
2.1.2 Em ergency Operations Facility (EOF)............................ 13 2.1.3 M e d i a R e l a t i o ns............................................... 14 4
2.2 Local EOCs and Support Organizations................................. 16 1
2.2.1 S t. C harl e s P ar i s h............................................. 16 l
2.2.2 St. John the Baptis t Parish EO C................................. 18 2.2.3 J e f f e rs o n P ar i s h.............................................. 21 2.2.4 S t. J a m e s P ar i s h.............................................. 22
- 2. 3 U t ili t y S uppo r t...................................................... 23 (Il 2.3.1 Medical Support -- Ochsner Hospital /St. Charles Ambulance LL Se r v i c e...................................................... 23 l
2.3.2 U t il i t y iss u e s................................................. 24 3 TRACKING SCHEDULE FOR STATE / LOC AL ACTIONS...................... 25 1
4 EVALU ATIO N OF OBJ E CTIVES........................................... 27 4.1 Summary of FEM A Objectives Remaining to be Met...................... 27 i
4.2 FEMA Objectives Tracking-Waterford 111 Steam Electric Station........... 27 l
TABLES 3
L l
1 Corrective Actions for the Waterford 3 Exercise...........................
26 2 Summary of Objectives Remaining to be Met at the Waterford 3 Steam Electric Station as of October 14,1986.....................................
28 3 FEM A Objectives Tracking Chart Waterford 3 Steam Electric Station.......... 29 l
l 111
e ABBREVIATIONS Argonne National Laboratory ANL Department of Energy DOE Department of Transportation DOT Emergency Broadcast System EBS Emergency Operations Center EOC l
Emergency Operations Facility I
EOF Environraental Protection Agency EPA Emergencv Planning Zone EPZ Federal Emergency Management Agency FEMA Health and Human Services i
HHS Joint Information Center JIC Potassium lodide KI
,1 Loulslana Nuclear Energy Division LNED Loss-of-Coolant Accident LOCA Loulslana Office of Emergency Preparedness LOEP Loulslana Power & Light Company LP&L Millirems per hour 1]
mR/h Nuclear Regulatory Commission id NRC Protective Action Guide PAG PAR
- Protective Action Recommendation Protective Action Section PAS Public Information Officer PIO Regional Assistance Committee M
RAC RADEF-Radiological Defense did Reactor Coolant System n'
RCS Q,
Radiological Defense Officer RDO Radiological Emergency Preparedness REP Standard Operating Procedure SOP J
United States Department of Agriculture USDA l
iv
s INTRODUCTION AND AUTHORITY On December 7,
1979, the President directed the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) to assume the lead role responsibility for all off-site nuclear power facility planning and response.
FEMA's immediate basic responsibilities in Fixed Nuclear Facility Radiological j
Emergency Response Planning include:
Taking the lead in off-site emergency response planning and in the i
review and evaluation of State and local government emergency plans, and ensuring that the plans meet the Federal criteria set forth in NUREG-0654 FEM A REP-1, Rev.1 (November 1980).
Determining whether the State and local emergency response plans can be implemented on the basis of observation and evaluation of an exercise conducted by the appropriate emergency response jurisdictions.
p
~'
Coordination of the activities of volunteer organizations and other involved Federal agencies. Representatives of these agencies serve as members of the Regional Assistance Committee (RAC), which is chaired by FEMA.
- U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)
- U.S. Ensironmental Protection Agency (EPA)
- U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)
- U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) i
- U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT)
- U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA)
- U.S. Department of the Interior (DOI)
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration a.
Y
1 1 EXERCISE BACKGROUND The fourth Radiological Emergency Preparedness Exercise for the Waterford 3 Steam Electric Station (W-3) was conducted on October 14,1987. Two Parishes, St. John the Baptist and St. Charles, fully participated in the exercise. The State of Louisiana and St. James and Jefferson Parishes partially participated. The initial, qualifying, Radiological Emergency Preparedness exercise was conducted February 8,1984, with all involved jurisdictions fully participating. The Federal Emergency Management Agency participated in evaluating the off-site radiological emergency response capabilities of the State and local jurisdictions in all four of these exercises.
On October 15, 1987, following the exercise, three meetirigs were held -- a 7:30 a.m.-11:00 a.m. review by the 13-member Federal evaluation team with the Region VI RAC Chairman of the preliminary results of the exercise; a 1:00 p.m. critique for State, local and utility officials to present a preliminary overview of the results of the exercise; and a 5:00 p.m. Public Critique of the exercise at the St. Charles Parish Courthouse, Hahnville, Louisiana.
'1 Section 2 of this exercise report provides narratives, together with descriptions of Deficiencies, Areas Requiring Corrective Action and Areas Recommended for ue l
Improvement (if any) for each of the participating jurisdictions and field activities tested B
in the exercise. Section 3 provides a summary listing of the Deficiencies that would lead to a negative finding and Areas Requiring Corrective Action, including those needing l
priority attention. This summary is in tabular format and provides space for State and F..
local jurisdiction responses and schedules for corrective actions.
There were no Deficiencies found during the evaluation of this exercise.
7 Section 4 of this report compiles, in tabular format, all FEMA Objectiv. s met or yet to be achieved (based on the requirements of NUREG 0654/ FEMA REP-1) as well as a separate summary sheet of those FEMA Objectives which have not been satisfactorily met or tested to date.
The findings presented in this report have been reviewed by the RAC Chairman y
of FEMA Region VI. FEM A suggests that State and local jurisdictions take corrective actions in response to any problems indicated in the report, and that the State submit a schedule for addressing these problems. The Regional Director of FEMA Region VI is responsible for certifying to the FEMA Associate Director of State and Local Programs a
and Support, Washington, D.C., that all Deficiencies and Areas Requiring Corrective l
Action have been corrected, and that such corrections have been incorporated into State and local plans, as appropriate.
The following provides a brief narrative overview of the exercise performances of the State of Louisiana and participating Parishes.
More detailed discussions of l
performance by individual agenc!es or exercise activity locations are provided under the l
appropriate location in Section 2.
1 l
l I
2 C
1.1 EXERCISE
SUMMARY
State of Loulslana Operations The Louisiana Office of Emergency Preparedness (LOEP) and the Louisiana Nuclear Energy Division (LNED), both locate:1 for the exercise at the LOEP State Emergency Operating Center (EOC), in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, participated in the Waterford 3 exercise. Both agencies demonstrated an adequate level of raadiness for dealing with a radiological emergency. As the objedives of the exercise required only partial participation by the State, only the staffing required to demonstrate the objectives was present at the EOC. Operations were well managed by the LOEP and LNED personnel present, and the entire staff was involved in decisionmaking.
6 As described in previous exercise reports, physical aspects of the EOC are adequate to support continuous emergency operations and maps, displays and other J'
support materials are available and were effectively used. Communications facilities, L
equipment and procedures functioned well throughout the exercise.
I
,~
Local Government Operations Local jurisdictions participating in the exercise include the two parishes located within the 10-mile plume EPZ, St. Charles Parish and St. John the Baptist Parish, and, to a limited extent, Jefferson and St. James Parishes in a support role. These local participants capably demonstrated the resources, knowledge and initiative necessary to L
alert their citizens, and to implement appropriate protective actions to protect their residents in the event of an incident at Waterford 3.
Facilities at the Parish EOC's are, for the most part, adequate and provide space, equipment and other resources to support emergency operations. Effectiveness of EOC communications equipment, procedures and staff was adequately demonstrated.
Detailed evaluations of performance at each locality are provided in Section 2 of this report.
1.2 FEDERAL EVALUATORS Evaluator Agency Location Gary Jones FEMA Overall Coordination Carl McCoy FEMA LA State EOC Frank Wilson ANL W-!!! EOF
3 Harry Harrison FEMA W-Ill EOF and Gramercy Monitoring / Decontamination Station Dana Cessna FEMA Media Center Mike Brooks FEMA Media Center Leland Peyton FEMA St. Charles Parish EOC Gene Nunn FEMA St. Charles Parish EOC Gary Kaszynski ANL St. John the Baptist Psh. EOC Al Lookabaugh ANL St. John the Baptist Psh. EOC
}
Phil Edgington HHS Ochsner Hospital, St. Charles d
Ambulance Service and Girard Reception Center Tom Carroll ANL Ochsner Hospital, St. Charles Ambulance Service and Girard Reception Center l
1.3 EXERCISE OBJECTIVES
~
The exercise objectives selected for the State of Loulslana and the participating local jurisdictions were designed to provide the opportunity to demonstrate that their off-site emergency response plans, operations and capabilities were adequate to cope with a radiological incident at the Waterford 3 Steam Electric Station. The objectives were developed during joint discussions between the utility (Loulslana Power and Light f",
Company); the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region IV; the Federal Emergency l
Management Agency, Region VI; the Loulslana Nuclear Energy Division; the Loulslana Office of Emergency Preparedness; and St. Charles and St. John the Baptist Parishes.
1.3.1 State of Louisiana Objectives (Partial Participation):
0 1
3.
Demonstrate ability to make decisions and to coordinate emergency activities.
5.
Demonstrate ability to communicate with all appropriate locations, organizations, and field personnel.
- 10. Demonstrate ability to project dosage to the public via a plume exposure, based on plant and field data, and to determine appropriate protective measures based on PAGs, available shelter, evacuation time estimates, and all other appropriate factors.
4
- 21. Demonstrate ability to make the
- decision, based on predetermined criteria, whether to issue KI to emergency workers and/or the general population.
- 22. Demonstration ability to distribute and administer KI, once the decision has been made to do so.
- 24. Demonstrate ability to brief the media in a clear, accurate, and timely manner.
- 25. Demonstrate ability to provide advance coordination of information released.
- 36. Demonstrate the adequacy, operability and effective use of emergency communication equipment and the adequacy of communications procedures and methods.
- 37. Demonstrate the ability to monitor Emergency Classification levels continuously and implement procedures in a timely manner.
1.3.2 Parish Objectives St. Charles Parish (Full Participation) 1.
Demonstrate ability to mobilize staff and activate facilities promptly.
B 3.
Demonstrate ability to make decisions and to coordinate emergency activities.
'I 4.
Demonstrate adequacy of facilities and displays to support emergency operations.
I 5.
Demonstrate ability to communicate with all appropriate locations, organizations, and field personnel.
- 13. Demonstrate ability to alert the public within the 10-mile EPZ and disseminate an initial Instructional message within 15 minutes.
- 14. Demonstrate ability to formulate and distribute appropriate instructions to the public in a timely fashion.
- 15. Demonstrate ability to implement protective actions for plume pathway hazards.
5
- 20. Demonstrate ability to continuously monitor and control emergency worker exposure.
- 22. Demonstrate ability to distribute and administer KI, once the decision has been made to do so.
- 24. Demonstrate ability to brief the media in a clear, accurate, and timely manner.
- 25. Demonstrate ability to provide advance coordination of information released.
- 36. Demonstrate the adequacy, operability, and effective use of emergency communications equipment and the adequacy of communications procedures and methods.
- 37. Demonstrate ability to monitor Emergewy Classification levels continuously and implement procedures in a timely manner.
u...
St. John the Baptist Parish (Full Participation)
E 1.
Demonstrate ability to mobilize staff and activate facilities promptly.
3.
Demonstrate ability to make decisions and to coordinate emergency activities.
Iy~
4.
Demonstrate adequacy of facilities and displays to support emergency operations.
l S.
Demonstrate ability to communicate with all appropriate I
locations, organizations, and field personnel.
- 13. Demonstrate ability to alert the public within the 10-mile EPZ and disseminate an initial instructional menage within 15 g
minutes.
g
- 14. Demonstrate ability to formulate and distribute appropriate instructions to the public in a timely fashion.
- 15. Demonstrate ability to implement protective actions for plume pathway hazards.
l
- 20. Demonstrate ability to continuously monitor and control emergency worker exposure.
l l
l l
t
6 v
- 22. Demonstrate ability to distribute and administer KI, once the decision has been made to do so. NOTE: St. John the Baptist Parish policy does not require that El be issued to emergency workers except on a voluntary basis.
- 24. Demonstrate ability to brief the media in a clear, accurate, and timely manner.
- 25. Demonstrate ability to provide advance coordination of information released.
- 36. Demonstrate the adequacy, operability, and effective use of emergency communications equipment and the adequacy of communications procedures and methods.
- 37. Demonstrate ability to monitor Emergency Classification levels continuously and implement procedures in a timely manner.
'Il St. James Parish (Partial Participation)
- 29. Demonstrate adequate equipment and procedures for decon-tamination of emergency workers, equipnient, and vehicles.
Jefferson Parish (Partial Participation) 5.
Demonstrate ability to communicate with all appropriate locations, organizations, and field personnel.
r
- 27. Demonstrate adequacy of procedures for registration and 6
radiological monitoring of evacuees.
- 3 0.
Demonstrate adequacy of EMS transportation, personnel, and procedures for handling contaminated Individuals including proper decontamination of vehicle and equipment.
- 31. Demonstrate the adequacy of hospital facilities and procedures for handling contaminated Individuals.
- 39. Demonstrate that authority exists in activating a reception center (as necessary) in a timely manner.
- Ochsner Foundation Hospital.
7 1.4 GUIDELINES FOR OFFSITE PARTICIPATION This exercise will include the full participation of the two risk parishes (St. Charles and St. John the Baptist), but only partial partic*pation of two support parishes (St. James and Jefferson) and two State agencies. The Louisiana Office of Emergency Prcparedness (LOEP) and Loulslana Nuclear Energy Division (LNED) will demonstrate communications and decision-makhg. The State EOC will be activated only to the extent that these functions are exercised. Other State response organizations will not be activated at the State EOC. A State decision-making group composed of LNED and LOEP executives will be convened to coordinate and assist with simulated implemen-tation of protective action recommendations. LNED will activate its headquarters to demonstrate communications capability only.
An emergency response team will be dispatched from LNED headquarters to the licensee EOF to demonstrate accident assessment and protective action recommendations. LNED field monitoring teams will not participate in this exercise, and all State field team aettvities will be simulated.
(However, the licensee will operate its offsite field teams.) The State will demonstrate its media operations at the licensee's emergency news facility, which is located in downtown New Orleans.
St. Charles and St. John the Baptist Parishes will activate and staff their respective EOCs.
This will include their executive groups for decision-making, but personnel will not be deployed into the field for implementation of protective actions.
Normal activities will be conducted in the Parish EOCs such that requirements of the exercise scenarlo are fulfilled. These activities include direction and control, use of
- 9 procedures and internal displays, communications, security, radiation control measures, and recovery.
~q Capability for alert / notification to the public, institutions, and industries within i
the plume exposure pathway EPZ will be demonstrated consistent with the scenario, but strens will not be activated. The sheriff and fire responders will participate only to the extent that they engage in exercise-related communications. Transportatien resources or other resources outside of the risk parishes will not be activated, except as necessary to demonstrate objectives associated with a medical drill, monitoring and decontamination of evacuees and emergency workers, and activation of a reception
' ')
However, various resources may be notified as part of exercise-related center.
communications. Special facilities, including schools, hospitals, nursing homes, and jails will participate only to the extent that they will be included in exercise-related communications which affect those specific institutions.
Demonstration of EMS and hospital fact!!tles sad procedures for handling contaminated injured will be performed by Ochsner Foundation Hospital and a medical helicopter unit. (The "victim" will be an onsite LP&L employee.) Demonstration of reception center activation, with monitoring and decontamination of "evacuees", will take place in Jefferson Parish at the Girard Reception Center.
Monitoring and decontamination of emergency workers and equipment will be demonstrated in St. James Parish by the Gramercy Volunteer Fire Department.
0 1.5 EXERCISE SCENARIO
SUMMARY
Tha sequence of events hypothesized in this exercise package is provided to test the integrated emergency response capability of organizations established to protect the public should an actual emergency occur. In order to achieve a sequence of events that will mobilize these emergency organizations in fulfillment of the objectives of this exercise, the scenario must contain incredible plant situations, unlikely equipment failures and failure sequences, and improbable operator actions. It is stressed that offsite personnel (e.g., the public) should not be misled into believing that an event causing the radiological consequences postulated by this scenario could occur. The following is a summary of these events:
The plant is operating at 100% power. Start-up testing for cycle 3 was satisfactorily completed two days ago. The A/B Charging Pump has a cracked cylinder block and will be out of service for the remainder of i
the exercise. The "A" Emergency Diesel is out of service for routine N
maintenance wi3 a scheduled completion by the end of the day shift on a{
October 14, 1987. Reactor Engineering and Performance personnel will be inspecting fuel in the Fuel Handling Building throughout the dsy.
nce October 14, 1987 State Local Esercise Trsching No.)
State Local
- 35. Demonstrate the ability C.4 1
K 2/8/84 2/8/84 to ef f ect ivel y call (s&L) upon and utilise out-side support agencies erhen local capabilities are esceeded.
36.
Demonstrate the ade-F.1 Demonstrate the adequacy, 1
I 10/15/86 10/15/86 10/15/86 quacy, operability and (5&L) operability and effective 10/14/87 10/14/87 10/14/87 effective use of eser-use of emergency comanuni-gency communication cations equipment and the equipment and the adequacy of communications adequecw of communi-procedures and methods.
cations procedures and methods.
(Objective for which capability should be demonstrated during-p each full participation w
esercise) 1 l
l l
l 1
I l
l l
l l
l L__
TABLE 3 (Cont d)
Deficiency / Area Date Jurisdictional Requiring correc-Objective MutEC-0654 Exercise objective saeponsibility Date of tive Action (by net FEMA Objectives Reference October 14, 1987 State Local Esercise Tracking No.)
State local
- 37. Demonstrate ability to D.4 Demonstrate ability to I
I 10/15/86 10/15/86 10/15/86 1
monitor Emergency (S&L) monitor Emergency 10/14/87 10/14/87 10/14/87 I
Clamelfication levels Classification levels continuously and continuously and implement implement procedures in procedures in a timely a timely menner.
menner (Objectives for which capability should be demonstrated during each full participation esercise)
- 38. Demonstrate capability E
I 9/18/85 2/8/84 9/18/85 to effectively process (S&L) all incoming messages in a timely manner.
s~
hJ e
1 I
a e<.
s
[
N8 l
lll n*
4
! nh7 nh l
8 t neh os8 os a
/ s ogs si/si c
8 at uirr4 r r e
o
/E aor ea1 ea v
L 2
BR af P/f P Pf 0f i
et t e
1 e J
J t ce aeM Dj b
4 O
e 8
t
/
a 8
t
/
S 2
acy eeb rr()
A r
/ono yC o N c i ngt g enc n iiAi cr k
iiec f uva e qi r D etT R
7 e
8 f s
/
oi 4
c 1
er
/
t e 0
ax 1
DE F
l yl at a M
nic I
ol o.
ii 1 tb ci i s d n soe i pt 4
rs a I
uet JRS
't y-t es i re r r
c e oae n e
h n n v7 t g a
i8 u ns m t9 aia c1 t( y e
t a l
j,
av b4 hirw O1 e
t t e i
ct t er se ea ne a ib t
co as c rt ri n
ec t
ni xO s eo E
nti) ost y mipr es ea Dece 4$e 6 c 0n
)
- e. 3. L
- e C r E e
- 2. A S Rf
(
Je A
FR t nn) hegn aioy cb no h
i r i ii t
t a h
rt ps w
ua a es.
dd p se ce r l
i t
v ece u
c s
i re n ro i i
t nn oh t
x c
a f s r
e e a m a
)
j d p d
b e
sy e
O t
ga l
eyt t
ayn( e vt a l) l o
IA rti m ii r e
n u s ti t i
tl t C
D s rart ci s i
f
(
F nove eb n c
ohit a j aoh r mt t n bpmce 3
e uc en Oaeas Daaci
( cd ee E.
lB A
9 T
3 I
I llll1ll l
i l