ML20151D746
| ML20151D746 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Summer  |
| Issue date: | 07/14/1988 |
| From: | Bradham O SOUTH CAROLINA ELECTRIC & GAS CO. |
| To: | Hayes J NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION & RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (ARM) |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8807250227 | |
| Download: ML20151D746 (3) | |
Text
.
South Caronna Electric & Gas Company
- i. j.
- guggrnmer Nuclear Statim 10CFR50.36 Jenkinsville, SC 29065 SCE&G
.$lEtjog 2
e.c- =,.
July 14, 1988 Document Control Desk U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555 Attention:. Mr. John J. Hayes
Subject:
Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station Docket No. 50/395 Operating License No. NPF-12 Diesel Generator Testing "No Significant Hazards Determination".
Dear Hr. Hayes:
Find attached the "No Significatont Hazards Determination" for the proposed Technical Specification changes to the Diesel Generator Testing as requested via telephone July 12, 1988.
Should you have any questions, please advise.
Very truly yours, M
Vice President, Nuclear Operations 03/0SB:bch A m iments c:
Page 2 bef 8807250227 680714
\\
PDR ADOCK 05000395 P
PDC i
%~- "t 'v Document Control Desk
..~-
_ July:14, 1988 -
? age 2 c:
0.:A? Nauman//0. W. Dixon,_Jr./T. C. Nichols,'Jr./J. G. Connelly, Jr.
E.~C. Roberts O. R. Moore W..A. Williams,-Jr.
'J.:N. Grace J.-'J.' Hayes, Jr.
General Managers C. A. Price R. B. Clary W. R. Higgins R. M. Campbell, Jr.
-K. E. Nodland J. C. Snelson G. O. Percival R. L. Prevatte
.J.
B. Knotts, Jr.-
H. G. Shealy.
l x.
i ATTACHMENT NO SIGNIFICANT HAZARDS DETERMINATION Based on the following evaluation, SCE&G has determined the proposed change does not involve a significant hazards consideration.
- 1) Does the proposed change involve a significant increase in the probability or consequences of an accident previously evaluated? NO The pro?osed amendment does not involve a significant increase in the probabi,ity or consequences of an accident previously evaluated because the only change is a reduction in frequency and severity of diesel generator test starts which will result in less wear and stress on enpne parts. This will decrease the probability of an accident due to failure of engine paru, and the consequences of an accident will n'ot change.
- 2) Does the proposed change create the possibility of a new or different kind of accident from any accident previously evaluated?
NO The propsed amendment does not create the possibility of a new kind of accident from any accident previously evaluated because the design and function of the diesel generator will not change.
- 3) l>oes the proposed change involve a significant reduction in a margin of safety?
NO The proposed amendment does not involve a significant reduction in the mar gin of safety because there will be no change in response times or emergency loac s assumed in the accident analysis.
I i
I l
l I