ML20150F081
| ML20150F081 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Hatch  |
| Issue date: | 07/12/1988 |
| From: | Crocker L Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | NRC |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20150F076 | List: |
| References | |
| TAC-68222, TAC-68223, NUDOCS 8807180124 | |
| Download: ML20150F081 (1) | |
Text
V o arev,$'o, UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION c.
WASHINGTON, D C. 20665
%,..../
Jul; 12,1988 Docket Nos. 50-321 and 50-366 MEMORANDUM FOR:
Sholly Coordinator FROM:
Lawrence P. Crocker, Project Manager Project Directorate II-3 Division of Reactcr Projects-I/II
SUBJECT:
REQUEST FOR PUBLICATION IN BIWEEKLY FR NOTICE - NOTICE OF ISSUANCE OF AMENDMENT TO FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE (TACS68222/68223)
Georgia Power Company, Oglethorpe Power Corporation, Municipal Electric Authority of Georgia, City of Dalton, Georgia, Docket Nos. 50-321 and 50-366, Edwin I. Hatch Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2, Appling County, Georgia l
Date of application for amendments: May 6, 1988, as supplemented June 7, 1988 Brief description of amendments:
The amendreents modified the Technical Specifications by replacing the organization charts with more general organization requirements.
Date of issuance: July 12,1988 Effective date: July 12, 1988 Amendment Nos.:
155 and 94 Facility Operating License Nos. DPR-57 and NPF-5.
Amendments revised the Technical Specifica ions.
Date of initial notice in FEDERAL REGISTER:
June 3, 1988 (53 FR 20397).
The supplemental in' rmation submitted by the licensee on June 7, 1988 was editorial is nature and did not affect the substance of the initial notice or the staff's proposed no significant hazards consideration determination.
l The Commission's related evaluation of the amendments is contained in a Safety Evaluation dated July 12, 1988.
8807180124 880712 ADOCK0500g1 PDH P
j.
\\s Sholly Coordinator No significant hazards consideration comments received:
No.
Local Public Document Room location: Appling County Public Library, 301 City Hall Drive, Baxley, Georgia 31513 Original signed by:
Lawrence P. Crocker, Project Manager Project Directorate II-3 Division of Reactor Projects-I/II DISTRIBUTION:
Docket File PDII-3 Reading MRood DMatthews LCrocker Hatch Reading 0GC-Rockville Sholly Coord. (orig + 1)
LA JI-3 PM DI
-3 MR d LCrocker:pw D atthews l
'/ //J/88 7 //p/88 q/g/88
4 0,
We find the requested changes acceptable as the new position of General Manager-Nuclear Plant is the position that provides direct executive oversight over all aspects of the Hatch Plant.
4 GPC requested the revision of Section 5 to delete Figure 5.2-1 and change the reference in this section from Senior Executive Vice President to Vice President-Nuclear.
He find these requested changes acceptable as they conform to Generic Letter 88-06 and the new designation of responsibilities.
On the basis of its review as discussed above, the NRC staff concludes that the licensee has provided an acceptable response to these items as addressed in the NRC guidance on removing organization charts from the administrative control requirements of the TS.
Furthermore, the NRC staff finds that these changes are consistent with the staff's generic finding on the acceptability of such changes as noted in GL 88-06. Accordingly, the NRC staff finds the TS changes to be acceptable.
3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATION
The n amendments relate'to changes in administrative procedures or require-ments. Accordingly, the amendments meet the eli categorisi exclusion set forth in 10 CFR 51.22(gibility criteria for c)(10).
Pursuant to 10 CFR 51.22(b), no environmental impact statement or environmental assessment need be prepared in connection with the issuance of these amendments.
4.0 CONCLUSION
The Commission made a proposed determination that the amendments involve no significant hazards consideration as published on June 3,1988 in the Federal Register (53 FR 20397), and consulted with the State of Georgia.
No public comments were received, and the State of Georgia did not have any coments.
On the basis of the considerations discussed above, the staff concludes that:
(1) there is reasonable assurance that the health and safety of the public will not be endangered by operation in the proposed manner, (2) such activities will be conducted in compliance with the Comission's regulations, and (3) the issuance of these amendments will r.ot be inimical to the common defense and security or to the health and safety of the public.
Principal Contributors:
F. Allenspach, LPEB/DLPQ L. Crocker, PDII-3/DRP-I/II Dated: July 12, 1988