ML20150C408

Requests Updated Data Responses for Each Licensee to Question B.1 & All Subsections of Reg Guide 9.3.Response Should Begin Where 860224 Response Ended & Be Submitted within 60 Days of Ltr Date

ML20150C408
Person / Time
Site:	Vogtle
Issue date:	06/23/1988
From:	Matthews D Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:	Hairston W GEORGIA POWER CO.
References
RTR-REGGD-09.003, RTR-REGGD-9.003 NUDOCS 8807120466
Download: ML20150C408 (2)

Text

t

, 4#

/ps atog o

'h  !"

' ,,o UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 7; t WASHINGTON, D. C 20555

.....,o June 23, 1988 Mr. W. G. Hairston, III.

Senior Vice President-Nuclear Operations Georgia Power Company P. O. Box 4545 Atlanta, Georgia 30302

~

Re:;;Vogtle=ElectriclGenerating^ Plant, Unit 2 - Docket No. 50-425A; Updated ' Regulatory Guide' 9.3 'Information Pursuant to the Commission's Operating License Antitrust Review

Dear Mr. Hairston:

Pursuant to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's (NRC or Commission) antitrust review responsibilities, the NRC staff enalyzes changes in the licensees' activities that have occurred since the initial antitrust review at the construction permit stage. If multiunits are included in the application for the construction permit review (e.g., the Vogtle Electric Generating '

Plant), separate operating license reviews are conducted for those units which are scheduled to be licensed 18 n'onths or more after the previous unit has been licensed.

Unit 1 of Plant Vogtle received its full power license from the Commission on ,

March 16, 1987 and the antitrust operating license review for Unit 1 was completed on November 21, 1986. In light of the scheduled April 1989 full power license for Unit 2 of Plant Vogtle and the projected time period of over two years between antitrust operating license reviews for Units 1 and 2, staff is requesting updated data responses for each licensee to question B.1 and all subsections, as well as question B.2 of Regulatory Guide 9.3 (copy enclosed).

Your response should begin where your Fet,ruary 24, 1986 response ended and j continue to the present. Pending transactions, agreements, etc., at the time of your 1986 response should be brought up to date and any new developments since the 1986 response should be addressed. In responding, be as specific as possible j and elaborate where appropriate. For example: Do not respond to a question  ;

concerning requests for power by merely giving a "yes" or a "no" response.

Elaborate with names, dates and descriptions of the type of power request. l Follow this procedure in responding to all questions in Regulatory Guide 9.3. I Please provide your response, including those of the other co-licensees, Oglethorpe Power Corporation, Municipal Electric Authority of Georgia and the f$k OK0 S M

1 Mr. W. G. Hairston, III. June 23,1988 City of Dalton, within sixty (60) days of the date of this letter. If you i have any questions regarding.this request, contact William M. Lambe at (301)492-1277.

Sincerely, ,

original Signed by/

David B. Matthews, Director i Project Directorate-II-3 a Division of Reactor Projects - I/II Office of Nuclear Reactor Reguhtion Distribution Docket No. 50-425A (Central:Fjles33 PDFES Rdg Wlambe DNash i CThomas  !

l BVogler, 0GC ,

DMatthews  !

JHopkins, PH '

flRC POR LPDR (DF)

Enclosure:

As stated r

PD ES:PTSB Wlambe/lt PD Dit i

SI PTSB TS s

/

i PD23:NRR JHopkins OGC $

BVog er flfD DM&tthews 1

6 //(p/88 (/g/88 82/88 (, / S/88 (p /gl /88 (;/3/88 4

diA 5' l

l

'G" October 1974

'l in ik 5 5 [55 . . i b RY GUIDE DIRECTORATE OF (1EGULATORY STANDARDS REGULATORY GUIDE 9.3 -

INFORMATION NEEDED BY THE AEC F EGULATORY STAFF IN CONNECTION WITH ITS ANTITRUST REVIEW OF OPERATING LICENSE APPLICATIONS FOR NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS 1

A. INTRODUCTION items and any related changes that have occurred or I are planned to occur since subminion of the As required by the December 19,1970, amendments construction permit application:

to the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, the Atomic Energy Commission conducts antitrust reviews with respect to

a. Anticipated exceu or shortage in generating constmetion permits and operating licenses it issues for capacity resources not expected at the construc-commercial nuclear facilities. 'Ihe Commhslon must tion permit stage. Reasons for the excess or

.under certain circumstances, make a finding as to shortage along with data on how the exceu will be whether the activities under the permit or license would allocated, distributed, or otherwise utilized or how create or maintain a tituation inconsistent with the the ahortage will be obtained. -

antitrust laws. An antitrust review at the operating beerue stage is not required unless the AEC determines

b. New power pools or coordinating poups or fuch review h advisable on the ground that afsniScant , changes in structure, activities, policies, practices, changes in the licerace's activities or proposed activities or membership of power pools or coordinating have occuned aabsequent to the previous antitrust groups in which the licensee wu, is, or will be a review conducted by the Attomey General and the partidpant.

(' Commission at the construcuon permit stage. Thh regulatory guide identifies the type ofinformation that

, the Regulatory staff considers germane for a decision as c, Changes in transmissi>n with respect to (1) the l nudear plant, (2) interconnections, or (3)  ;

to whether a accond antitrust review 1: requhed at the operating license stage.

connections to wholesale customers. I

d. Changes in the ownership or contractual allocation  ;

• of the output of the nudear facility. Reuons and  ;

8. INF0RMATION NEEDED BY THE AEC basis for such changes should be included. l REGULATORY STAFF IN CONNECTION WITH ITS ANTITRUST REVIEW ** ' ' #88 ' "*

,j schedules and reasons for'such changes. Rate i OF OPERATING UCENSE APPLICATIONS increases or decreases are not neceuuy. I POR NUCLEAR POWER Pl. ANTS

f. l.Ast of all (1) new whdesale customers, (2) transfers from one rate schedule to another,

1. To assist the reguistory staff in its review, an including copies of schedules not previously applicant for a heense to operate a commercial furnished, (3) changes in beensee's service area, nudeu power plant should cocaider the following and (4)1icensee's acquhitions or mergers.

hM$ $, lg M w"se.Yc NN.t"MYeN U'E OE Yi Y.M* UNM@mTE .

0,**Tl M:O"'t ." l'::::T.'.':::M d., '*.":". : L**, *.", '"o.'~4da:l:4:=.**"""~~" "' "'-

t ^ l,2:;'.tTV :"#.","O.'Tmc# =. n.

n,. e -

$ .[e py s. 1. P.=.r 8t e 4, Ps. sham i F:: .* i ?.".ll?.=.', i L~L.,

l:::::". ::. :,::'.'." ":ll".:::::t'.

t u,"; ."#,:::: ll:::,,,.,,it. '=:" -

o~ 4 -

c.Q V cd b

t, .

g. Ust cf those genersting capacity additi:ns 2. Ucenwes chose construction permits include c:n-( committed for operation after the nucleas facuity, ditions pertaining to antitrust aspects should hst and including ownership rights or power output discuss thou actions or policies which have been aBocations, Arnplemented in accordance with such conditions.

3. Five copies of a separate document entitled I "Information for Antitrust Review of Operating

h. Summary of requests or indications of interest by Ucenu Application" and containing the above other electric power wholesale or retau dis- requested information should be submitted when the tributors, and licenwe's response, for any type of operating licenu application documents are sub-electric wrvice or cooperative venture or study. mitted or as soon thereafter as possible.

r O

as-

=~ O O

e es i

l I

9J 2

' -- m_ , , _ , ,.y_-,__, _ , _ _ _ , _, ___, , , , , _ , , , _ _ _ ,